Military Review

Honey and tar Dmitry Medvedev

159
From 23 to 27 in January, a prestigious economic forum is held in Davos, which brings together politicians and economists from all over the world to look at how smooth the snow is in the Alps, and in the intervals between the contemplation of wonderful landscapes to chat about financial problems and prospects. In recent years, the Russian official delegation regularly attends the Davos Forum, and is trying to provide a kind of report on what progress has been achieved (if possible, of course) in the last year in Russia. At the same time, one of the most important tasks of the Russian delegates is the task of attracting foreign investors to the Russian Federation.




This time, the official delegates from Russia went to Switzerland: Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Foreign Minister Vladimir Titov, Deputy Head of the Administration of the Government of the Russian Federation Sergei Prikhodko, and also Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich.

Considerable attention, both from the Russian press and from foreign publications, was riveted on the speech of Dmitry Medvedev and his activities in the framework of the Davos forum. As befits one of the most senior officials, Medvedev in his speech touched on the main achievements of the Russian Federation in recent years. In principle, it would be obviously strange if the prime minister began to talk to those gathered (and, in fact, to the whole world) about Russian problems. These problems and without it are well known to many. Yes, and often much better known than positive changes in the life of Russia. And it is precisely the Russian problems and flaws that are actively exaggerated by a number of certain foreign and domestic publications, which often look very one-sided and give reason to think that someone is trying with all his might to belittle or even close with opaque fabric recent years Russia.

Medvedev decided to show the world community that in Russia things are, in fact, much better than many "well-wishers" try to imagine.



One of the main Russian successes of recent times, the Prime Minister considers the stabilization of the demographic situation in the country. If you believe the official statistics, which is based on data from a number of research agencies, over the past year, Russia has shown an increase in population. Indicators of this increase are still more than modest (slightly more than 4,5 thousand people), but even they show that the population in Russia remains stable. But even 8-10 years ago, foreign, and some Russian forecasters, stated that by the 2014-15 years in Russia there will be about 130 million inhabitants ...

Medvedev actually made it clear to foreign "partners" that the words that Russia is an endangered state, in which it makes no sense to invest and with which it makes no sense to run a business, in fact, have lost all meaning. Speaking about the fact that with demography in Russia, things are much better than a certain stratum of people thinks, Prime Minister Medvedev could well have increased the data on the sad demographic statistics of some European Union states (some Baltic countries, for example). However, Medvedev limited himself to presenting information about the demographic situation exclusively in Russia.

Dmitry Medvedev believes that another achievement of Russia in recent years is the full integration into world markets. As an example, he cites data on Russia's accession to the WTO: accession after 18 years of trampling under the door of the World Trade Organization.

Well, if the situation with the stabilization of the population of Russia (an increase in the birth rate, small, but an increase in the life expectancy of citizens of the country) can be called clearly positive, then joining the WTO raises questions. Calling this step for Russia an immutable good can be a stretch. Until now, criticism of the authorities in this direction has not stopped, and criticism does not always come from opposition politicians and economists. The signing of the document on Russia's accession to the WTO is often criticized by those who are considered to be forces standing on the side of the authorities.

Medvedev, obviously realizing that his words caused an ambiguous reaction, hurried to use his favorite weapon, which can be expressed like the following phrase: joining the WTO will not bring manna from heaven today and now, and therefore you need to tune in to receive benefits in the medium and long term. However, here he seems to be forgetting for some what country he lives in. After all, “receiving benefits in the long run” means only one thing: the Russians are again asked to wait for better times or a “bright” future. With these appeals, all the authorities in our country, without exception, sinned, and therefore the promises of an indispensable onset of a brighter future, and not of the present, managed to fill the most genuine edge with most Russians.

But let's not forget that the forum in Davos is a kind of colorful postcard, which is prepared not for internal use at all. It is designed exclusively for those who represent foreign capital. Apparently, it was them who “reminded” Dmitry Medvedev about the accession of the Russian Federation to the WTO: they say, gentlemen, money bags, if earlier you stated that you were afraid to invest in Russia, because it does not play by the general rules, now what's stopping you? Come and make your money work.

True, in this case, our statesmen could easily turn to our (“homegrown”) money bags, which, apparently, are no less in Russia than in other large economies of the world. And if these “bags” would invest their money in Russian production, Russian education, science, sports, and health care, and not pack money for transferring them to foreign banks, then the Russian economy could well have jerked up without a host of foreign investments ...

Dmitry Medvedev said at the forum that Russia’s achievement also considers the fact that the ruble has turned into a weighty regional currency in the past few years. With all the words of some of Russia's neighbors that, they say, they do not see the necessary stability and a clear basis in the Russian economy, a large percentage of citizens of the same countries actively use Russian rubles as one of the main foreign currencies. Bank exchangers throughout the former Soviet Union use the Russian ruble as one of the main currencies for exchanging besides the dollar and the euro. Even in Georgia, whose president during the years of his rule did everything to sever any positive ties with Russia, the ruble is among the three most popular for currency exchange in the world.

By the way, about Georgia ... It was in Davos that a very significant meeting took place - a meeting of the prime ministers of the two states - Russia and Georgia. Since August 2008, this is the first meeting of officials of the Russian Federation and Georgia of such a high level. World agencies say that Bidzina Ivanishvili himself started a conversation with Dmitry Medvedev. It is surprising that several days before the start of the economic forum, information was received from Georgia that Ivanishvili was not going to hold meetings and conversations with representatives of the delegation at all. However, in reality everything turned out differently.

Obviously, one should not assume that during the short conversation, the Presidents of the governments of Russia and Georgia managed to agree on significant shifts in bilateral relations, but it is still safe to say that the ice was broken ...

After a number of statements by Dmitry Medvedev about what progress Russia has achieved over the past few years, forecasters have again joined in (at least, this is how these people position themselves). Some of the forecasters saw in the speech of the Russian prime minister several contradictions with what Vladimir Putin once said. One of these contradictions was discovered when Medvedev announced the continuation of the privatization of public sector enterprises. Then they began to recall Medvedev and how Putin "outplayed" his decision on the law of libel, that Putin’s position is much tougher than Medvedev’s position as such. And as soon as such contradictions with the position of the president were revealed, materials began to be published in which the authors precisely "know" that Medvedev is waiting for resignation. Both opposition and pro-presidential publications have begun to sin with similar forecasts. Like, Medvedev becomes a bone in Putin's throat ... It becomes, and that's it ...

At the same time, none of the “retired” materials says, and what, in fact, did such a terrible thing happen in the country during the time that good or bad Medvedev represents the Russian Government with his good or bad team? Corruption at the Ministry of Defense? So there, officials filled their pockets (well, at least they are suspected of stuffing their pockets) even before Medvedev came to his current post. Rising prices? And what, unless the pricing policy only the government of Medvedev in our country can not fully control? It seems like with all the prime ministers, and with all the governments, prices were rising ... Maybe only Medvedev began to talk about privatization? Again, there is no: before him state objects were sold to private hands, and this sale was not always at the expense of the country's economy. Maybe the fact is that the government does not provide 5% GDP growth for the year, but gives only 3,6% so far? But for this, too, it does not seem to be dismissed in the current realities.

So maybe a number of political analysts and analysts "set aside" Medvedev simply because someone wanted "fresh blood." They say that Putin will send Medvedev to resign, and the country will even shake himself up - he will get the spectacle ... Well, we have plenty of shows and so on. history It was; downright more than enough ...

And in general, why is Putin now, when the situation in Russia is relatively stable, to dismiss the Government? The President understands that he is “left” today or tomorrow by Medvedev, the opposition will obviously be able to take advantage of this (quite constructive and systemic, let alone non-systemic and even more so), which has been looking for a more or less adequate leader for a long time. And no matter how much they say that Medvedev is today rather weak as an individual politician, but in the case of his resignation, he may have a serious base on which he can rely. Does Putin need it today? Obviously not. Why does the president ruin the system that he has actually built in recent years? So the resignation of the cabinet of ministers in Russia, about which they had been actively spoken about in the media the other day, is clearly a contrived event.

In general, while the Russian delegation continues to conquer the Swiss Alps and lure foreign investors, against this background, everyone is trying to solve their problems. Politics is politics ... It itself has long been one of the sections of big world business. Such a political Davos, it turns out ...
Author:
159 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. YARY
    YARY 25 January 2013 08: 37 New
    +23
    Just that, this one ............. has been punching with a Georgian already whipping with dignity at least!
    He panicked for a day while our “equal” in Tskhinval and now there too!
    1. older
      older 25 January 2013 08: 43 New
      +15
      Quote: Ardent
      the bottom is that, this ............. has been handle with a Georgian already flogging with dignity
      Hmm ... As they say the lower classes, You have to answer for the bazaar ... So much time and ...
      But overall, Medvedev is becoming more and more a technical figure ... Not a leader ...
      1. domokl
        domokl 25 January 2013 09: 03 New
        +7
        But it seems to me that Medvedev and Putin are playing an old game - a bad and a good policeman ... ugh politician ... One is solid and unyielding, the other creates the illusion of softness ... Only in 08 it was this soft one that made a very tough decision ...
        1. Misantrop
          Misantrop 25 January 2013 10: 47 New
          +13
          Quote: domokl
          Only at 08 it was this soft one that made a very tough decision ...

          Medvedev accepted? Maybe a couple with Serdyukov? belay Given that they are both learned about the beginning of hostilities from the media and almost a day late ... IMHO, but if he had been in the topic from the very beginning, he would not only give South Ossetia, but also try to raft North Ossetia there. Judging by how he "leaked" Libya ...
          1. Atlon
            Atlon 25 January 2013 11: 27 New
            +4
            Quote: Misantrop
            Given that they both learned about the start of hostilities from the media and almost a day late ...

            What is the source of information ("everyone knows" - not accepted!).
            Quote: Misantrop
            IMHO, but if he had "been in the subject" from the very beginning, he would not only give South Ossetia, but also try to raft North Ossetia there. Judging by how he "leaked" Libya ...

            Your IMHO - complete nonsense! (what do you smoke, comrade?)
            1. Misantrop
              Misantrop 25 January 2013 11: 41 New
              +15
              Quote: Atlon
              What is the source of information ("everyone knows" - not accepted!).

              TRUE information on this subject cannot be by definition. If anyone has access to the secrets of such a level, hell will be here to share. Or am I mistaken? But the fact that neither Medvedev nor Serdyukov at all understand and do not know ANYTHING about secure communication systems is a fact. An example is the transfer of fleet headquarters to St. Petersburg. If only after the move it became clear that the connection was completely lost not only with the fleets, but also with their own ministry ...
              WHAT did you think organizing this move?
              And the opinion of Serdyukov about the uselessness of the GRU?

              Well, now tell me, HOW could these two eagles competently use what they have no idea about?
              1. Atlon
                Atlon 25 January 2013 13: 51 New
                -1
                Quote: Misantrop
                TRUE information on this subject cannot be by definition. If anyone has access to the secrets of such a level, hell will be here to share. Or am I mistaken?

                You are not mistaken. It’s all the more strange that you write such nonsense.
                Everything else is not even worth commenting on. Akin to babskie trepidation in the kitchen. So I leave it on your conscience.
                1. Misantrop
                  Misantrop 25 January 2013 15: 42 New
                  +8
                  No need to move to conscience and arguments such as "woman's trepidation." Answer the simple and clear question:
                  Quote: Misantrop
                  HOW could these two eagles competently take advantage of what they have no idea?

                  And then it will become clearer which of us writes nonsense. Was there a special communications officer (or instead of him - another minister’s mistress) as part of that delegation? And if he did, then when he was admitted to the "royal body" with a report on what was happening in South Ossetia?
                  1. Atlon
                    Atlon 25 January 2013 16: 33 New
                    -3
                    Quote: Misantrop
                    HOW could these two eagles competently take advantage of what they have no idea?

                    I will answer if you answer: "How do you know this?"
                    1. Misantrop
                      Misantrop 25 January 2013 16: 56 New
                      +2
                      About the fleet headquarters? From a former colleague from the General Staff of the Navy. And he is not a scribe there wink
                      1. Atlon
                        Atlon 25 January 2013 21: 00 New
                        -3
                        Not about the headquarters, but about what you are saying here. Namely:
                        Quote: Misantrop
                        HOW could these two eagles competently take advantage of what they have no idea?

                        And here it is:
                        Quote: Atlon
                        Given that they both learned about the start of hostilities from the media and almost a day late ...

                        But something tells me that you have nothing to say. so, the next blah blah home-grown strategist and expert on ALL issues! tongue
                      2. Misantrop
                        Misantrop 25 January 2013 22: 59 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Atlon
                        Another blah blah homegrown strategist and expert on ALL issues!

                        So far, this is exactly what I see from you. In addition to inflating cheeks and children's pranks, at least ANYTHING Related will be? Or again, as in the next topic about the Black Sea Fleet, the deepest thought that Russia is larger than Turkey laughing
                      3. Misantrop
                        Misantrop 26 January 2013 02: 02 New
                        0
                        Oh, minus has appeared. A serious answer, most importantly - reasoned laughing
          2. polly
            polly 25 January 2013 23: 33 New
            +4
            But they kept improving their professional level all the time ...
          3. Sirocco
            Sirocco 26 January 2013 05: 50 New
            -2
            I’ve looked pocket experts in the field of analytics, and forecasting the political and military situation in the world))))) The fact that the Rodents were preparing for provocation has long been known to our intelligence, and don’t worry, everything was ready, for a warm welcome))))) Not overestimate your capabilities, and underestimate intelligence capabilities
            1. Misantrop
              Misantrop 26 January 2013 11: 47 New
              +1
              Quote: Sirocco
              I look pocket analysts appeared
              But pocket strategists, who believe that everything is under control and is proceeding as planned, did not disappear anywhere. laughing Do not share the reasons for your confidence? I do not ask to share information sources for obvious reasons lol
      2. dmitreach
        dmitreach 25 January 2013 11: 40 New
        +5
        Come on? Does the president from the media find out about the war? Somehow it hurts in Hollywood ....
        He did not merge Libya; he was divorced as a schoolboy. (What is he still a minus)
        I am so burning, for it is one thing to exchange the Colonel like a pawn. And quite another when Russia is faced with double standards.
        He is an adherent of International Law. He believed the General People, and there the interpretation of the adopted resolution is very broad ...
        The phrase: the international community will take all measures to ensure peace - has been very ambiguous. (Literally, I don’t remember looking for laziness.)
        1. Misantrop
          Misantrop 25 January 2013 11: 51 New
          +7
          Quote: dmitreach
          He did not merge Libya; he was divorced as a schoolboy.

          Geniuses and psychics in politics are still rare. And so that there were no such Lochowsian divorces, the GRU existed. The very thing that this leader with his "most effective minister" valiantly dispersed, considering it unnecessary
          1. dmitreach
            dmitreach 25 January 2013 13: 13 New
            +3
            Whatever the “like Libya” was, the leader should have a character. And there will be the GRU and the rest. That's the trouble - it turned out that DAM is a lawyer in the world of "pink lawyers", but in real life they are thrown. Simple and not forced.
            1. Uncle
              Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 25 New
              -1
              Quote: dmitreach
              the leader must have character. And there will be the GRU and the rest.
              Stalin also had intelligence, and the best, only he did not believe her ...
              1. the polar
                the polar 26 January 2013 21: 14 New
                0
                Did Svanidze tell you this?
        2. Uncle
          Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 23 New
          +6
          Quote: dmitreach
          He is an adherent of International Law. He believed the General People, and there the interpretation of the adopted resolution is very broad ...
          During his reign, such diabolical ideas as juvenile justice and e-government took root. He will not disentangle this until the end of his life, he will be restoring it in the next world.
          1. sergo0000
            sergo0000 25 January 2013 15: 11 New
            +2
            Uncle,
            I agree about juvenile. But what didn’t please you with electronic government !? smile
            1. Uncle
              Uncle 25 January 2013 16: 02 New
              +1
              Quote: sergo0000
              But what didn’t please you with electronic government !?
              Chipization of the population.
              1. sergo0000
                sergo0000 25 January 2013 18: 08 New
                +3
                Uncle,
                Explain. Someone is forced to sew a chip, or something !?
                In my opinion on the Internet you are registering voluntarily!
                1. Uncle
                  Uncle 25 January 2013 21: 59 New
                  0
                  Quote: sergo0000
                  Explain. Someone is forced to sew a chip, or something !?

                  In the article "Biometric passport - point of no return" there is an answer to your questions ...
          2. Ross
            Ross 26 January 2013 00: 42 New
            +1
            But, let's not forget that the forum in Davos is a kind of colorful postcard, which is not prepared for internal use at all. It is designed exclusively for those who represent foreign capital.


            The Davos Forum is the brainchild of the financial capital of the Rothschilds. Therefore, our oligarchs and officials have such an interest.
        3. Atlon
          Atlon 25 January 2013 13: 53 New
          +6
          Quote: dmitreach
          Come on? Does the president from the media find out about the war? Somehow it hurts in Hollywood ....

          Here I am about the same. And then many commentators just know how it really happens!

          Quote: dmitreach
          He did not merge Libya; he was divorced as a schoolboy. (What is he still a minus)

          Is not a fact. Anyway, there are too many commentators who are in the know. Right here are homegrown geniuses of strategy. It's funny to listen. The President's information is incommensurably longer than all of us combined.
          1. Misantrop
            Misantrop 25 January 2013 15: 49 New
            +5
            Quote: Atlon
            It's funny to listen. The President's information is incommensurably longer than all of us combined.
            Well then, let me curiosity. WHAT Medvedev exchanged the loss of a strategic ally and billions of contracts? At least something sane say. Or there will be only phrases like "smart master, he knows" lol
            1. Botanologist
              Botanologist 25 January 2013 20: 41 New
              +4
              WHAT Medvedev exchanged for the loss of a strategic ally and billions of contracts

              Under the contracts - are you talking about that scam that Gaddafi arranged during a big tour of the world? This is when he bought rockets and boats from France, tanks from Germany, fighters from Sweden, and we have something else to the heap? And you did not confuse the budget of Libya with the budget of China for an hour? If suddenly you are ready to argue - well, specifically, the specification for contracts lol

              The loss of a strategic ally - yes, he is an ally to everyone. This is the East, a matter, as Sukhov said, a subtle one. How did he help us? I only milked the USSR first,
              then Russia.

              So your question is rhetorical.
              1. knn54
                knn54 27 January 2013 17: 29 New
                0
                Regarding Gaddafi, I agree, He repeated the fate of Shevarnadze, only a more bloody version. You can’t sit on two chairs.
                The “3rd Way” project failed - atheist communists; the capitalists have a bestial attitude towards people ...
                As for 08.08.08, Russia was in a difficult situation: to start first means the aggressor, not answer, lose face. It reminded the situation before the start of the Second World War.
                But Medvedev, I’m sorry, is not a leader. Refusal to sell S-300 DEFENSE systems to Iran, loyalty to Serdyukov ...
                As for Georgia, there is a chance to form about the Russian lobby. In our difficult times in the Transcaucasus, it’s crucial.
          2. bazilio
            bazilio 25 January 2013 15: 49 New
            +3
            Quote: Atlon
            Anyway, there are too many commentators who are in the know.


            Yes Yes. Not only are they up to date, they also understand the intricacies of geopolitics, strategy and analysis.

            Particularly touching talks about the "drain" of Libya. And how should you not merge it? Engage in armed conflict? Or what?

            And the fact that DM thought for a day about South Ossetia, now now give instructions that it was necessary to do so, and not otherwise, many can. It seems to be a simple situation "of our beating, running to the rescue." But not many people think about the possible consequences and scenarios. Remember how the Western media covered the operation to force Georgia to peace.
            1. brelok
              brelok 26 January 2013 08: 05 New
              0
              Amers do not really think about the media and do it right. Russia thinks too much about this. in principle, one turn of the valve and the whole of Europe is on its knees! they are very afraid of this
              1. bazilio
                bazilio 26 January 2013 12: 39 New
                +2
                Quote: brelok
                amers do not really think about the media and do the right thing


                Firstly, who can do something to them? neither in the military nor in the political aspect, no one can pressure them alone. secondly, if you give the West an excuse, then it may come to an armed clash between the West and the Russian Federation, not to mention all sorts of embargoes and other instruments of pressure. As of 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX, the Russian army would be ready for battle not with the Georgian, but with one or more European armies, especially from the United States? Also, keep in mind that part of the gold reserves of the Russian Federation is stored just in the West, was the Russian economy ready at that time to freeze these assets? I do not condone or condemn the decision of the DM in South Ossetia, it’s just now easy to judge what would be best done. I stand for thoughtful decisions. Again, about the situation with peacekeepers. It was necessary to help unambiguously. But on the other hand, what forces and in what quantity needed to be thrown to help? which enemy would have to face. And if DM gave the order to immediately go to the rescue, and this group would be in a prepared ambush? There would be more victims, and then you, commentators, would argue that this betrayal is to send yours into battle without preliminary training and intelligence, or am I wrong?
    2. evgenm55
      evgenm55 25 January 2013 11: 39 New
      +8
      Oh well? Is he really? For a whole day the soldiers stood to death, but he accepted ..... what and where? This, if not betrayal, is meanness. And Serdyukov also has the most authoritative and honest ....
    3. VAF
      VAF 25 January 2013 12: 39 New
      +10
      Quote: domokl
      But it seems to me that Medvedev and Putin are playing an old game, a bad and a good policeman ... phew politician.


      Alexander, +! drinks

      Yesterday I "ran" between the telecom and the computer .. I wanted to participate in the "battles" and see the forum.

      Now, if he himself did not see and did not hear. I would never have believed:

      1. Question to Medvedev, the Russian economy rests on oil and gas, if suddenly this Lafa ends, what will happen to the economy?
      The answer is so what. the economy will not fall apart we are all right ?????

      And it says the chairman of the government ???? wassat

      Note - the budget for 2013 (as well as 12,11.10, etc.) is made up of 80% of revenues from production and gas. Well, the rest is taxes and so on the little things !!!!

      2. And then Oleg Deripaska speaks, he listened and ... LADY needs to urgently resign along with his codena of ministers!
      Although Deripaska is the brightest proPU !!!

      But Volodin, as always .. only +! It’s very cool ... but only gently, although it’s understandable, the journalist should be a cultured person, and not ... 2haml "like me! wink
      1. dmitreach
        dmitreach 25 January 2013 13: 20 New
        +3
        Hmm ...
        It’s becoming more and more difficult to intercede for LAD ... belay
      2. Uncle
        Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 28 New
        +5
        Quote: vaf
        so what. the economy will not fall apart we are all right

        What happened in your submarine?
        She drowned ...
        They do not care, celestials, however ...
      3. Don
        Don 28 January 2013 15: 38 New
        0
        Quote: vaf
        Note - the budget for 2013 (as well as 12,11.10, etc.) is made up of 80% of revenues from production and gas. Well, the rest is taxes and so on the little things !!!!

        Budget revenue? You are mistaken Sergey. Last year, 37% customs duties, 34% VAT, 17% mineral extraction tax, 9% corporate tax. Also, look. How can the Russian Federation be the 6th economy of the world? Only due to oil and gas? Why, then, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Algeria, Libya, Angola, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Brunei are not even in the top twenty? The main export item of Ukraine is steel and rolled products. Ukraine is in 8th place in the world in terms of these indicators, and the Russian Federation in 3rd place. Russia sells 50% of steel and rolled metal to foreign markets. And this is just one of the factors.
        Quote: vaf
        And then Oleg Deripaska speaks, he listened and ... LADY needs to urgently resign along with his codela of ministers!
        Although Deripaska is the brightest proPU !!!

        Did Deripaska say Medvedev’s resignation? Do not drop the link? I doubt something very much.
    4. brelok
      brelok 26 January 2013 07: 58 New
      0
      what a naive boy! he never made decisions !!!! nor any. ass on the perch laughing domokl,

      domoklwhat a naive boy! he never made decisions !!!! nor any. ass on the perch laughing
  2. JonnyT
    JonnyT 25 January 2013 09: 06 New
    +4
    He was never to them! Ambitions were no more ........

    But you should not write it off ...... it can perfectly perform other important functions, only control is needed!
    1. yak69
      yak69 25 January 2013 11: 16 New
      +13
      Come to your senses citizens! What such a function can be performed by Medvedev ?? !!
      His level is the deputy head of the department of the provincial institute. And they “trusted him the country !!” (in fact, they “trusted”). What he did during his term - he renamed the police to the police, signed START-3 (on which we bent even more under amers), but moved the clock hands and all his "exploits."
      But no, I also advertised iPhones and iPads. Horseradish seller!
      1. DERWISH
        DERWISH 25 January 2013 15: 10 New
        +2
        and badminton wassat
        1. Garrin
          Garrin 25 January 2013 23: 36 New
          +1
          Quote: DERWISH
          and badminton wassat

          100W bulbs forgot and 0 ppm. Reformer, ..
  3. Ascetic
    Ascetic 25 January 2013 09: 58 New
    +11
    Quote: older
    But overall, Medvedev is becoming more and more a technical figure ... Not a leader ..


    In an interview with Bloomberg TV, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said he would not compete with Vladimir Putin because he considered it wrong:
    It's impossible. We are one political force. Why should we compete ?.

    My webpage

    Interestingly, Putin himself has not publicly announced anywhere that he will participate in the 2018 elections.
    In November 2012, the same Medvedev in an interview with French media said that he does not exclude the possibility of re-heading the country
    “If I have enough strength and health for this, and if our people trust me in the future, this work, of course, I don’t exclude the turn of events,”


    Therefore, once again you are convinced that Medvedev is a sort of zi-chairman of the Pound, the figure is by no means independent, but a puppet.
    1. older
      older 25 January 2013 10: 05 New
      +4
      Quote: Ascetic
      Therefore, once again you are convinced that Medvedev is a sort of zi-chairman of the Pound, the figure is by no means independent, but a puppet.
      If you need to raise a soldier in an attack, you need an evil, seasoned and brave commander, who the hell is not a brother ... but if the same commander becomes the commander of the compound and trample on the attack, he ..
      Putin’s style is good for extreme sports, in a calm environment, sharpness is harmful ... And then the figure of ala Medvedev appears on the scene ...
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 25 January 2013 10: 24 New
        +4
        Quote: older
        Putin’s manner is good for extreme sports, in a calm environment harshness is harmful ...

        A calm situation is only not expected in the near future, and there was none.
        1. Uncle
          Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 30 New
          0
          Quote: Vladimirets
          A calm environment is just not expected in the near future,

          Rest only in our dreams...
        2. rolik
          rolik 25 January 2013 14: 54 New
          +2
          Quote: Vladimirets
          A calm environment is just not expected in the near future

          That is why DAMA is sent to secondary affairs. At the forefront, as always, he would screw up. Therefore, the GDP is absolutely, I repeat absolutely, all important matters are decided by myself. Because I haven’t found a second reliable person yet, and the sixes will only spoil everything.
    2. dmitreach
      dmitreach 25 January 2013 10: 30 New
      +8
      All the same, I will say in defense.
      Medvedev is a good lawyer, and a person who did not break the GDP rate. In his place, he is the right person. I would not want the next president, as Medvedev checked the war. Those who counted on its gentleness really really believed that in Russia there is no Gray Cardinal?
      The fact that he is the "zi-chairman of the Pound," he knows, and probably sucks. Especially raising a son.
      I never thought that being the President or Prime Minister in Russia could be so hard. All the same, Medvedev is not a hunchback, and the level of ridicule is even more.
      But he is not a leader. It is a fact.
      1. Misantrop
        Misantrop 25 January 2013 10: 57 New
        +4
        Quote: dmitreach
        Medvedev is a good lawyer

        How “good” he is is a lawyer is evident even from the reaction of the constitutional court to his legislative initiatives lol
        1. dmitreach
          dmitreach 25 January 2013 10: 59 New
          +2
          True remark.
          I am anxious to remember something in support of DAM .... recourse request
          1. atalef
            atalef 25 January 2013 11: 14 New
            +2
            Quote: dmitreach
            I am trying to remember something in support of DAM

            I will remind you
            On March 2 of 2008 of the year, having officially collected 70,3% (52 530 712) of voters who took part in the elections, he was elected President of the Russian Federation [2]. On May 7 on 2008 of the year, he assumed the presidency of the Russian Federation, becoming the youngest president in the history of modern Russia (42 of the year and 7 of the month).

            70% of election support. good
            1. dmitreach
              dmitreach 25 January 2013 11: 45 New
              +4
              For the sake of objectivity, Putin’s word played a big role there. Or the Wizard of Churov.
            2. brelok
              brelok 26 January 2013 08: 19 New
              0
              I could have got 120, too! repeat
      2. VAF
        VAF 25 January 2013 12: 27 New
        +8
        Quote: dmitreach
        Medvedev is a good lawyer,


        Here, no doubt, because you probably know in which company he worked as a lawyer and whose interests he defended?

        Quote: dmitreach
        not broken GDP rate.


        Is he ... a suicide ???

        Quote: dmitreach
        The fact that he is the "zi-chairman Pound," he knows


        It's easy here. +! good

        Quote: dmitreach
        All the same, Medvedev is not a hunchback


        Because he does not have Paradise!

        Quote: dmitreach
        But he is not a leader. It is a fact.


        Here is the same, +! good Only because of my mentality would I apply a more "capacious" epithet. but ... site rules prohibit!
        1. dmitreach
          dmitreach 25 January 2013 14: 19 New
          +2
          Because he does not have Paradise!
          ahhh i'm under the table !!!! I'll be right back)))))) 100500 good
      3. Uncle
        Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 33 New
        +2
        Quote: dmitreach
        did they really believe that in Russia there is no Gray Cardinal?
        Let me remind you that at the time of the gray cardinal, Joseph's father, who really had great power, there was a red cardinal, Richelieu, also a strong figure. We have the same red cardinal - DAM, a laughing stock, as one of the bloggers aptly called him: Dmitry the Negligible.
      4. Botanologist
        Botanologist 25 January 2013 20: 50 New
        +3
        Medvedev is a good lawyer

        I wrote and will repeat:
        Lawyers need to be taken with hedgehogs, put in a state of siege, because this intellectual bastard is prone to foulness.
        V.I. Lenin, complete works.
    3. Misantrop
      Misantrop 25 January 2013 10: 55 New
      +2
      Quote: Ascetic
      Interestingly, Putin himself has not publicly announced anywhere that he will participate in the 2018 elections.
      In November 2012, the same Medvedev in an interview with French media said that he does not exclude the possibility of re-heading the country

      I’m afraid that in this situation even the hangover plumber will win the “tandem”. Yushchenko, however, did not reach a stunning "rating" lol but not far from him wassat
    4. Papakiko
      Papakiko 25 January 2013 11: 41 New
      +2
      Quote: Ascetic
      Therefore, once again you are convinced that Medvedev is a sort of zi-chairman of the Pound, the figure is by no means independent, but a puppet.

      No need so categorically about one person.
      All officials, all states Puppets!
      The most striking examples are Bushes, Clintons and Prime Ministers in England.
      Quote: Ascetic
      Interestingly, Putin himself has not publicly announced anywhere that he will participate in the 2018 elections.

      Score with a lapel on it, before this long 5 years.
      Live, breed, work, relax and so on.
      Naturally demonstrate a civic position in all ways and it will be GOOD and HAPPINESS to us all. drinks
      1. Uncle
        Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 36 New
        +3
        Quote: Papakiko
        All officials, all states Puppets!

        I do not agree, I had the opportunity to ask a knowledgeable person on this topic, not a puppet. Not absolutely free, but not puppets.
        1. Papakiko
          Papakiko 25 January 2013 21: 55 New
          0
          Dumb, like a tree, Jorick Bush, the youngest, in your opinion, comes out "nevz..ёklmnnyy" megalider-leader father and mother of the USA? belay
          Or Sarkozy with Berlusconi?
          Or maybe the leaders of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia ?? (purely for review, you can see in Wikipedia)
          Quote: Uncle
          had the opportunity to ask a knowledgeable person on this topic

          Ask a few more times.
          The Big Game (world politics) is not played with one card. hi
  4. Averias
    Averias 25 January 2013 10: 04 New
    +7
    In my opinion, even during the Presidency, Medvedev did not reach 100% of the leader. I somehow did not perceive him as the head of state, so an official, a showcase, called the President. Yes, and watched what Putin is doing, since he was constantly at the hearing. Well, there’s nothing in him, well, of the same charisma, brutality, I can’t pick up a word. In general, he does not have what Putin has.
    1. atalef
      atalef 25 January 2013 11: 20 New
      0
      Quote: Averias
      In my opinion, even during the Presidency, Medvedev did not reach the 100% of the leader. I somehow did not perceive him as the head of state

      Well, honestly, people still do not understand how beautifully they divorced him. Putin put such a person that the people would end the presidency as getting rid of the moron and fall asleep with the only thought when the GDP returns. What 4 of the year. billions of dough down the drain, who cares, the main thing is to maintain Putin’s power.
      His statement. about running for election 2018- not an empty phrase, people will do. as Putin says --- someone doubts this? laughing
      1. Averias
        Averias 25 January 2013 12: 53 New
        0
        Do you have a respected alternative presidential candidates? Call, announce the entire list please. And if not, then why such opuses? You do not need to consider yourself smarter than others, it’s clear to the hedgehog that Putin’s image was put into his head. So what? Let's do it without lengthy reasoning, such as: but if so. Just name the real candidate instead of Putin. And in support of Putin, I can cite here such a fact that crosses out his "shortcomings." The slave and humiliating treaty of the SORP, found the courage to break it, and no one else.
        1. Uncle
          Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 42 New
          +4
          Quote: Averias
          Do you have a respected alternative presidential candidates?

          I spoke with a large brow from Gazprom, also complained, “There are no decent people,” he directly told me that decent people can be found enough on any collective farm. An example is Lukashenko.
          1. Averias
            Averias 25 January 2013 15: 06 New
            +1
            Your division, as it turns out all is simple. But we are poor and did not know.
            Quote: Uncle
            I spoke with a large brow from Gazprom,
            . He seems to be close to the people, since he goes on collective farms. Stop screwing already. After all, he asked, without lengthy reasoning. Clear and short - WHO?
          2. Papakiko
            Papakiko 25 January 2013 21: 59 New
            +1
            Quote: Uncle
            I spoke with a large brow from Gazprom, also complained, "There are no decent people"
            good good good
            The Gazprom office, which even buys pipes from three manufacturers through its "laying", and not directly from each enterprise.
            Therefore, put the accordion on a shelf and do not "play music". wink
        2. atalef
          atalef 25 January 2013 14: 07 New
          0
          Quote: Averias
          Do you have a respected alternative presidential candidates? Call, announce the whole list please

          Only Medvedev, the rest who posed a threat to Putin, have long been destroyed or discredited by the authorities. Do you really think that for all of Russia there is no one but Putin and the next candidate - Medvedev?
          Quote: Averias
          Just name the real candidate instead of Putin.

          Until then. people will believe that all opposition will automatically be enemies of the state (more precisely, Putin 0 will never have such a candidacy, because it can arise only from the opposition from the party in power - only Putin and as an alternative to Medvedev. laughing
          1. Averias
            Averias 25 January 2013 15: 07 New
            0
            Again, demagoguery, it’s not difficult to answer shortly and clearly to the question posed without breeding demagoguery. Who!
            1. atalef
              atalef 25 January 2013 16: 18 New
              0
              Quote: Averias
              Who?

              Now? Only Medvedev.
      2. Uncle
        Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 39 New
        +3
        Quote: atalef
        Putin put such a person that the people would end the presidency as getting rid of the moron and fall asleep with the only thought when the GDP returns.

        Medvedev was so overwhelmed by democracy in the form of a juvenile, e-government (as you thought of such a term!) That it was barely able to wait until he was replaced.
  5. dmitreach
    dmitreach 25 January 2013 10: 20 New
    +4
    He never was. Here it is worth recalling how he appeared in public in the epostasy of the future president. When they started to spin it. The first thing that surprised me personally: a teacher and a top manager (in the past), and HESITATE to speak in public! And he does not keep his eyes in conversation with the interlocutor. It then just caught my eye. And it was also aggravated by the fact that Medvedev really complexed in public, in front of the cameras.
    In short, he was always a technical figure. A kind of quintuple boy whom the teacher praises. These are also needed. They play one game with the GDP, or rather, it has a place to be in Putin’s scenario.
    1. the polar
      the polar 26 January 2013 21: 24 New
      0
      Well, that means that in the tribunal Putin will answer for Luntik, for what purpose he promoted this down. And then the people are still incomprehensible.
  6. predator.3
    predator.3 25 January 2013 22: 15 New
    +2
    The visit of Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev to the World Economic Forum in Davos was remembered not only by his unconvincing speech to foreign investors, but also by the jokes of the head of government about the founder of Google. This was told by Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich.

    “There was, for example, such a funny moment. One foreigner told Medvedev: “You made a big mistake by releasing Sergey Brin (Google’s founder) to Israel.” “Now we would have arrested him,” said Dmitry Anatolyevich. “Then we had democracy, and now a repressive state,” Dvorkovich quotes “Moskovsky Komsomolets”. Then, in an interview with reporters, the Deputy Prime Minister explained, just in case, that it was a joke.

    Recall that Medvedev and Sergey Brin have a long history of relationships. As president, Dmitry Anatolyevich in June 2010 paid a visit to the West Coast of the USA, in particular, to Silicon Valley, from where he drew inspiration for the development of the Russian innovation center in Skolkovo. So then, Medvedev, having the opportunity to meet with Breen, one of the founders of Google, went on a visit only to Eric Schmidt, executive director of the corporation.

    Then, an article appeared in the newspaper The Wall Street Journal, which mentioned that at one time Sergey Brin spoke unflattering about Russia - for example, he called the country “Nigeria in the Snow”, and the authorities - a criminal gang that controls global energy supplies. Note that Brin lived in Moscow during the USSR, and in 1979, at the age of 6, he was exported by his parents to the United States.

    However, despite the prime minister’s jokes, the forum in Davos-2013 cannot be considered an asset to Russia. The main task of the Russian delegation was to show that the country is open for investment from abroad, and the government expects to make good money on privatization over the next two years. But, as it turned out during the forum, ineffective bureaucracy, high corruption and inadequate protection of property rights scare potential investors away. The Russian authorities have nothing to counter these fears except “manual control”, the effectiveness of which is inexorably decreasing.
    http://news.rambler.ru/17331575/
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 25 January 2013 22: 47 New
      0
      Quote: predator.3
      However, despite the prime minister’s jokes,


      good evening Ilham! hi here you write about jokes of the prime minister and I think that the prime minister is just mocking what
      I will explain even how

      Medvedev: it is more convenient for the prime minister to solve social and economic problems

      MOSCOW, 25 Jan - RIA News. Implementing an economic and social strategy as head of government is more convenient than presidential, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said, adding that he has every opportunity to implement all plans.
      Commenting on the Swiss newspaper Neue Zurcher Zeitung saying that many were disappointed with his refusal to run for president in 2012, Medvedev said: "What can I say to these disappointed citizens? That I work as the country's prime minister. This is a very serious job. . The decision of the most important tasks depends on the work of the government. "
      "I will do the same: I will implement the economic and social strategy. Moreover, the government will do it in some ways even more conveniently, because it is the government that is responsible for this," the prime minister emphasized.
      "So I have every opportunity to implement those plans that were formed earlier and which, perhaps, were not implemented," Medvedev said.
      “As for the future, no one knows it, wait and see. I hope that we will not disappoint our citizens,” he added.

      RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/politics/20130125/919818459.html#ixzz2J0uqcRoU

      we will analyze the points
      quote-Implement an economic and social strategy as head of government more convenient than in the presidency, what Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said, adding that he has every opportunity to implement all plans.

      since when in Russia the prime minister has greater powers than the president. I ask you just do not laugh, gibberish is just beginning

      quote-That I work as the prime minister of the country. This is a very serious job. The solution of the most important tasks depends on the work of the government. "

      and the work and activities of the president, what do you think Dmitry Anatolyevich, is that ?!

      quote- "I will do the same: I will implement the economic and social strategy. Moreover, from the government, to do this in something even more handy, because it’s the government who’s responsible for it, " - emphasized the prime minister.

      the question is what the president is responsible for, as the head of the highest executive power ?!

      quote- "So I have every opportunity to implement those plans that were formed earlier and which, perhaps, were not implemented, "

      no well after these words. I just can’t find the words belay

      quote- I hope that we will not disappoint our citizens, "
      Dmitry Anatolyevich, there is nothing more to disappoint than1After your quotes, commenting on anything is unnecessary!
  • Vadivak
    Vadivak 25 January 2013 09: 07 New
    +7
    Quote:.
    the words that Russia is an endangered state, in which it is pointless to invest and with which it is pointless to conduct business, in fact, have lost all meaning.


    In 2012, the natural decline in the Russian population decreased by more than 13 times compared to the previous year. Such fantastic news was told to journalists by the Minister of Labor and Social Protection Maxim Topilin.


    I don’t even know how to comment on this.
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 25 January 2013 09: 46 New
      +8
      Vadivak,

      As well as the duck to sell strategic bombers to China
    2. older
      older 25 January 2013 10: 07 New
      +2
      Quote: Vadivak
      I don’t even know how to comment on this.
      Pre
      Someone leaked a duck to someone .. Most likely, a journalist ... For several years now, the country has been living with an excess of fertility over mortality ... Another thing is that under these conditions the percentage of the working population in relation to the non-working is really reduced ...
      1. atalef
        atalef 25 January 2013 11: 21 New
        -1
        Quote: older
        Another thing is that under these conditions the percentage of the working population in relation to the non-working is really reduced ...


        which will inevitably lead to an increase in the retirement age.
      2. Papakiko
        Papakiko 25 January 2013 11: 55 New
        +3
        Quote: older
        For several years now, the country has been living with an excess of fertility over mortality.

        You, this one without fanaticism.
        Fertility has increased in large cities (regional centers) and the periphery continues to decline + youth also migrate to cities.
        If possible, Tajik-Uzbeks register their children in RUSSIANs or surrender to orphanages.
        Unfortunately, Russia is less and less Slavic.
      3. Iraclius
        Iraclius 25 January 2013 12: 03 New
        +3
        Quote: older
        For several years now, the country has been living with an excess of fertility over mortality ...

        Guys, where did such bold statements come from?
        So, I’m driving my daughter to kindergarten and for the sake of interest, I somehow arranged a social survey among my parents - how many children they have. 97% of respondents (44 people) replied that they have 1 children. request Either I'm not friends with arithmetic or in our kindergarten parents spoil statistics. while the rest of Russia is frantically breeding. no
        1. VAF
          VAF 25 January 2013 20: 54 New
          +4
          Quote: Iraclius
          Either I'm not friends with arithmetic or in our kindergarten parents spoil statistics.


          No, it's statistics ... on another planet.

          it's like with an average salary in the regions! From the director or official, 2-3-5 lemons per month from workers 5-8 thousand - we take the arithmetic average and ... we get 18-20 thousand - and it blurs on the screen!

          And just as for GDP growth ... and how to increase both wages and GDP, yes it is very simple. to organize another gang-office with officials and assign them salaries of 100-150 thousand- and again arithmetic .. bang and the average salary in the regions suddenly grows again!

          in general, this is no longer a divorce for suckers, for whom we are being held. but I don’t even know what !!!

          Remember the extreme teleconference of the great and Almighty? After all, he didn’t return to the answer to the teacher’s question about the fiction about salaries, but since 5-6 he was going to, lamented it because ... his servants somehow “missed” the uncomfortable question!
  • SASCHAmIXEEW
    SASCHAmIXEEW 25 January 2013 09: 50 New
    +1
    He didn’t panic, he was waiting for instructions from the State Department, and when he didn’t wait, he began to act by whit, and guessed it! And so this is the same Chubais to the country and the people, they benefit from zero, even rather a huge minus! Hurry, we’d disperse this shoble!
  • YARY
    YARY 25 January 2013 11: 23 New
    +8
    "So I listened to you all for a long time and carefully, and finally understood ......."

    Everyone wants a rebirth of a great and powerful power. Well, how does this iPhone Aipadych relate to these dreams?
    How are you all being led into political prostitution, huh ?!
    So start with yourself. Stand to the end, at least in front of you!
    Otherwise, all this is balabolstvo! It should be a shame!
    1. Vladimir_61
      Vladimir_61 25 January 2013 22: 10 New
      0
      Quote: Ardent
      So start with yourself. Stand to the end, at least in front of you!
      Otherwise, all this is balabolstvo! It should be a shame!


      Join.
  • Ragnarek
    Ragnarek 25 January 2013 08: 39 New
    +7
    a bunch of liberals from around the world to philosophize on economic topics. practical benefit - 0
    1. older
      older 25 January 2013 08: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: Ragnarek
      practical benefit - 0
      So you need to change the name .. Not a forum, but a gathering ... Discuss something, but why? It seems that they have nowhere else to talk ...
      1. domokl
        domokl 25 January 2013 09: 04 New
        +6
        The forum is needed just so that big business knows where the wind will blow and in the face of each other ... laughing
        1. dmitreach
          dmitreach 25 January 2013 10: 33 New
          0
          five points! laughing
        2. Papakiko
          Papakiko 25 January 2013 12: 09 New
          +1
          Quote: domokl
          rup business knew where the wind would blow and in the face of each other

          They already know each other and not only in person but in other places too.
          Not a forum, but a gathering.
          POLITICIANS, HEADS of states and corporations, as in our talk "" the bosses are not late, but the bosses are delayed "with variation" —the bosses come when it is needed. "
          So in situations with forums, congresses, meetings, meetings, etc.
          Forum - an event held to identify or solve any sufficiently global problems. This concept is found in political, economic, social, religious, environmental and many other areas of the life of modern society.

          True, what exactly is being discussed and how it is being implemented on the DEVO is not clear.

          In the example you can "anneal" Prokhorov and Co. lead.
  • Xtra1l
    Xtra1l 25 January 2013 08: 43 New
    +1
    I read that Ivanishvili was ready to do everything to meet with Putin. In Davos, he wasn’t decided with Medvedev and he’s not going to hold meetings and conversations yes
  • Bykov.
    Bykov. 25 January 2013 08: 44 New
    +2
    .... Honey and tar of Dmitry Medvedev ....

    M, yes, a gorgeous menu ...
    1. predator.3
      predator.3 25 January 2013 11: 16 New
      +3
      it is unclear why kremlyadam foreign investors, if so money above the roof, invest wherever your heart desires! Won African-Americans in Brooklyn, Prokhorov builds a chic stadium, buys a basketball team .. Abramovich buys a football, yachts, villas, parties for millions of euros ... Everything is strange ... What kind of economy is this and what kind of "economists" are there ?. ..
  • Aventurinka
    Aventurinka 25 January 2013 08: 49 New
    +8
    Conquer
    ??

    There is another option for "achievements"
    Food smelled from the hall, which experts and potential investors apparently preferred to the report of the Russian prime minister. And when the prime minister began to tell that the past Davos forecasts had not come true and “none of the indicated scenarios will be realized,” the number of investors leaving the hall increased significantly. There will be a fourth scenario, and what it will be depends on all of us - on investors, on the people, assured the prime minister
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 25 January 2013 09: 11 New
      +13
      Quote: Aventurinka
      The food that experts and potential investors obviously preferred to the report of the Russian prime minister.


      Well, the rudeness of these guys, do not take it yes. However, it seems to me if it was not Stalin who acted, but even Leonid Ilyich no one would run to eat, and it wouldn’t come to the hall to bring food
      1. dmitreach
        dmitreach 25 January 2013 10: 34 New
        0
        So they would not have listened to him. And Medvedev there seems to be like "mine." Which may be useful.
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 25 January 2013 12: 29 New
          +3
          Quote: dmitreach
          So they would not have listened to him. And Medvedev there seems to be like "mine." Which may be useful.

          They didn’t listen to him, but the West didn’t listen to him, but listened to every rustle. And you wrote correctly in Medvedev’s camp, it’s useful to them as any informant
          1. dmitreach
            dmitreach 25 January 2013 14: 25 New
            0
            Wow, then somehow merge the correct Old.
            What is it called: "influence agent"?
      2. Uncle
        Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 46 New
        +3
        Quote: Vadivak
        Well, the rudeness of these guys, do not take it yes.
        Artists are "slammed", premieres are "chewed up". smile
  • Igarr
    Igarr 25 January 2013 08: 49 New
    +6
    If I correctly understood Volodin A. - that this hangover does not solve anything and does not mean ...
    then everything is right.
    However ... the question arises - what for then article?
    ..
    Riddle.
  • fenix57
    fenix57 25 January 2013 08: 56 New
    +15
    Of course, I wildly apologize but "... to lure foreign investors ...", but there are no investors. By the number of billionaires, Russia is among the first in the world. Oh, they don’t give, so "interest" in the amendments to the Criminal Code! hi
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 25 January 2013 09: 18 New
      +12
      Quote: fenix57
      By the number of billionaires, Russia is among the first in the world.


      And ask them that Russia is their source of income no more, but real estate and everyone’s mobility over the hill and they live a completely different life - the yacht of Abramovich was surpassed in popularity by Melnichenko’s yacht, that's the whole story,
      1. Uncle
        Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 47 New
        +1
        Quote: Vadivak
        Yacht Abramovich

        Well, that is not higher than the Cathedral of St. Paul.
    2. vsa-xnumx
      vsa-xnumx 27 January 2013 21: 48 New
      0
      It is necessary to return the money withdrawn from Russia to offshore companies. If you do not want - a bullet in the forehead. Next, we turn to relatives. They want to live - they will return the loot, if only the will of the country's leadership would have been.
  • djon3volta
    djon3volta 25 January 2013 09: 01 New
    +8
    I watched Medvedev speak, and I also listened to the three scenarios written by the West. And when there was a vote of five questions, they say what needs to be done to make Russia better, the majority voted for the first (out of five) options - they say the power must be changed! As the West needs a different power, not the Russians, but the West needs a different power in Russia, it turns out that the West knows better what the Russians need. I know what kind of power they need, the one that was in the 90s, then the West was very happy with that! !! for some reason the people of the 90s did not like the fact that they in the 96th majority voted for Zyuganov, if only Yeltsin left with his 5% rating, but the West needed Yeltsin, because the West was good at that time rob the country. and now you see the West does not like the current government, rob it does not work like in the 90s.
    1. Masterzserg
      Masterzserg 25 January 2013 11: 03 New
      +3
      Yes, only in Russia now a generation is growing, which went to the pot at 96, and now it goes to rallies, because the very west washed their rudiments to them. Many of the yellow-eared now agree with the West and this is scary. Because there is power, but no mind.
    2. Snake4
      Snake4 25 January 2013 11: 46 New
      +2
      I don’t need such power when the members of the ruling junta have rights as nobles, and the rest of the population as serfs, and even if I am a minority on the site, all the Tsar’s lovers are here, but this will not change my position.
      1. Uncle
        Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 49 New
        0
        Quote: Snake4
        I don't need that kind of power

        Are you calling for armed rebellion?
        1. Snake4
          Snake4 25 January 2013 14: 23 New
          0
          This is your speculation, dear, I only express my position on the attitude to the current situation.
    3. evgenm55
      evgenm55 25 January 2013 11: 48 New
      +4
      I’m Russian and I’m an officer, but I also don’t need such power, the power of traitors, thieves and dummies.
  • FID
    FID 25 January 2013 09: 02 New
    +7
    The whole delegation wants to call - Starbolts!
  • Apollo
    Apollo 25 January 2013 09: 07 New
    +16
    good morning everyone! personally, my tongue doesn’t dare to call D. Medvedev a state politician. You should call a spade a spade.

    1. If D. Medvedev has his own electorate, definitely not.
    2. If a team, D. Medvedev definitely has no professionals.
    3. If D. Medvedev definitely doesn’t have his own program.
    4. Is D. Medvedev definitely not independent in decision-making?
    5. Will there be enough courage and confidence for Dmitry Medvedev to challenge V. Putin unequivocally.
    6. If positive in activity as the previous presidency and as Prime Minister D. Medvedev there is definitely no.
    7. Is there a political future for D. Medvedev is definitely not.

    Well, I went, taking a tablet with me, well, I sat. Well, I dined there with politicians and businessmen. Well, so what. In my opinion, D. Medvedev is not taken seriously either in Russia or in the West.
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 25 January 2013 09: 22 New
      +6
      Quote: Apollon
      Will there be enough courage and confidence to D. Medvedev to challenge V. Putin definitely not.


      In an interview with Bloomberg TV, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev did not rule out his participation in the 2018 presidential election, but said that he considered his competition with the current head of state, Vladimir Putin, impossible.

      Some kind of madhouse, did he understand what he said?
      1. volcano
        volcano 25 January 2013 10: 01 New
        +6
        Vadivak,
        Colleague, I think here he hinted that he was ready to go, but does not yet know whether Putin will go.
        And if Putin goes, then he will step aside.
        1. military
          military 25 January 2013 10: 13 New
          +2
          Quote: volkan
          And if Putin goes, then he will step aside.

          he won’t “go,” but he will skip around ... and, if necessary, heighed along with his “vis-a-vis” a powerful kick so as not to get under his feet ... laughing
          1. volcano
            volcano 25 January 2013 10: 45 New
            +3
            military,
            I personally am not so sure. Yesterday I saw him on the telly. He doesn’t look very cheerful. And ahead of 6 years. Yes, and don’t say it works a lot. Maybe with errors and is not always effective, but it works. Fatigue and exhaustion also concern him. Man has been in senior positions for over 12 years.
            So I admit that at 18 it won’t work. There will be no more strength. He is also a man of flesh and blood. And age and excessive stress will make themselves felt.
            1. evgenm55
              evgenm55 25 January 2013 11: 53 New
              +1
              Or maybe we recall Stalin? Volodya, in comparison with the LEADER, is so tense as an ox plowing five plows along the slope up ...
              1. volcano
                volcano 25 January 2013 18: 26 New
                +1
                Quote: evgenm55
                Or maybe we recall Stalin? Volodya, in comparison with the LEADER, is so tense as an ox plowing five plows along the slope up


                I think that you GUARANTEED DO NOT KNOW with what intensity it works. So why blame?

                I see that he travels a lot, holds meetings for several hours in a row .... I think he works a lot (we are not talking about the results here, we are talking about physical and mental stress).
                1. Misantrop
                  Misantrop 25 January 2013 18: 30 New
                  +1
                  Quote: volkan
                  I think that it works a lot (we are not talking about the results here, we are talking about physical and mental stress).

                  In fact, it is customary to judge (and pay) the work just by its results. So you can sweep the parade ground with a crowbar from dawn to dusk, also work is not a gift wink
            2. military
              military 25 January 2013 12: 00 New
              +2
              Quote: volkan
              So I admit that at 18 it won’t work. There will be no more strength. He is also a man of flesh and blood. And age and excessive stress will make themselves felt.

              let's see - see ... drinks but, for some reason, it seems to me - it will explode so that the moose will overtake ... repeat
            3. Uncle
              Uncle 25 January 2013 13: 51 New
              +1
              Quote: volkan
              He doesn’t look very cheerful.
              What about his face? Sometimes it seems to me that I see a double, and not the original.
              1. volcano
                volcano 25 January 2013 18: 27 New
                0
                Quote: Uncle
                What about his face? Sometimes it seems to me that I see a double, and not the original.


                That's about it, including I’m talking about ..
        2. Vadivak
          Vadivak 25 January 2013 11: 57 New
          +3
          Quote: volkan
          I think here he hinted that he was ready to go, but so far he does not know whether Putin will go.


          Yeah. Only Medvedev does not know whether Putin will go or not. The rest has long been clear and this is not.
      2. Apollo
        Apollo 25 January 2013 10: 03 New
        +4
        Quote: Vadivak
        did he understand what he said?


        Greetings, Vadim! hi
        D. Medvedev worked under the leadership of a strong and charismatic leader, who is V.V. Putin. This fact says a lot.

        Working under his direct supervision, he lost or maybe he didn’t have any mention of the main features of the politician.

        1.Make independent decisions
        2: uphold decisions made
        3. Take responsibility for decisions made.
        1. Misantrop
          Misantrop 25 January 2013 11: 04 New
          +4
          Quote: Apollon
          Working under his direct supervision, he lost or maybe he didn’t have any mention of the main features of the politician.
          .......................
          2: uphold decisions made

          Well, just stupid stubbornness (as, at least, on the issue of laws on road fines) he has enough wink
          1. Serg_Y
            Serg_Y 25 January 2013 13: 18 New
            0
            Why immediately stupid, defends the decision.
        2. Vadivak
          Vadivak 25 January 2013 11: 58 New
          +3
          Quote: Apollon
          or maybe he didn’t have them


          Good afternoon. That's right, a strong personality does not require charismatic helpers
      3. military
        military 25 January 2013 10: 10 New
        +2
        Quote: Vadivak
        In an interview with Bloomberg TV, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev did not rule out his participation in the 2018 presidential election, but said that he considered it impossible to compete with the incumbent head of state Vladimir Putin. Is he crazy, did he understand what he said?

        “I want, but I can’t!” ... in the language of medicine this corresponds to a very definite term ... repeat
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 25 January 2013 12: 30 New
          +4
          Quote: military
          . in the language of medicine

          Hi military, just like in the movies
          I can buy a goat but I have no desire
          1. military
            military 25 January 2013 20: 58 New
            +1
            Hi, Marshal! hi
            Quote: Vadivak
            I can buy a goat but I have no desire

            a good version of the "interlinear translation" of prime minister delirium laughing drinks
      4. evgenm55
        evgenm55 25 January 2013 11: 50 New
        +1
        I didn’t have time, yet it takes time for a clue flying across the ocean ...
    2. Serg_Y
      Serg_Y 25 January 2013 13: 09 New
      0
      You are generally familiar with the political system of Russia; for almost 100 years now we have not had an absolute monarchy.
  • Boris55
    Boris55 25 January 2013 09: 23 New
    +5
    More about Medvedev ... Although the film is long, I liked it. He highlighted all his rot ... how he sold our homeland ...

    1. ioann1
      ioann1 25 January 2013 19: 54 New
      +3
      Medvedev's betrayal is evident. Now the situation with domestic politics regarding Russianness and Orthodoxy is being clarified a little. The slogan "Orthodoxy or death" was strangely declared extremist.
      What is going on? Why are prosecutors, courts prosecuting Russian, patriotic citizens of the country? Why are there millions of illiterate migrants from Asia in Russia? Only questions so far ... But the answers are ahead.
    2. Chamber No. 6
      Chamber No. 6 26 January 2013 12: 22 New
      +3
      Boris55,
      Thanks for the movie!
      Quote: Boris55
      He flashed all his rot ...
      It seems to me that the “iPhone” brought rot to the top of power (a pro-Western, liberal-shitty democratic racket), entrenched in the Kremlin! Indeed, in itself, he is a jerk!
  • bubla5
    bubla5 25 January 2013 09: 24 New
    +2
    Why do we need investors, we don’t have anywhere to put our money, and if we don’t have nowhere or don’t want to, they’ll take them out over the hill, they just steal, so look at the patriots who put in grandmother over the hill, at least this bald dick from Moscow
  • andrey903
    andrey903 25 January 2013 09: 25 New
    -1
    Putin said that if the west does not change its attitude towards Russia, it will communicate with politicians (in quotation marks) like Medvedev
  • fenix57
    fenix57 25 January 2013 09: 31 New
    +4
    Quote: Vadivak
    And ask them that Russia is their source of income no more,

    I don’t remember exactly, it seems that at the beginning of the 90s in South Korea the population brought their gold to reception points in order to boost the economy, -here we go. Walk a little bullshit in the area of ​​Rublevka- and get an investment fund. yes
    1. military
      military 25 January 2013 10: 16 New
      +2
      Quote: fenix57
      I don’t remember exactly, it seems that at the beginning of the 90s in South Korea the population brought their gold to reception points in order to boost the economy — and here we go. Go through the small bullshit in the Rublevka region — and get an investment fund.

      life credo of power - "Hands off Rublev!" ...
      and "little bullshit" - always at the ready ... for the wallets of the population ... request
  • Dangerous
    Dangerous 25 January 2013 09: 42 New
    +10
    Do I have only one mention of Medvedev causes hostility and allergies? Unfortunately, I do not have literary talent to write beautifully about him, but I think that it is simply unthinkable for this person, completely divorced from reality, to occupy the second post in the state. Not a single speech speaks a word about the people, only their own interests, business and power. An ordinary teacher in an ordinary university for an ordinary salary - this is his place, not the country's leadership
    1. military
      military 25 January 2013 10: 18 New
      +3
      Quote: Dangerous
      Do I have only one mention of Medvedev causes hostility and allergies?

      You obviously flatter yourself, colleague! ... laughing drinks
    2. Boris55
      Boris55 25 January 2013 10: 18 New
      +4
      Quote: Dangerous
      .. An ordinary teacher in an ordinary university for an ordinary salary - this is his place ...

      What?! Can you imagine how much he pleases with a semblance?
      On x .., on x ... Died so died .... That country at least take pity ... laughing
    3. sergeybulkin
      sergeybulkin 25 January 2013 10: 28 New
      0
      No, the university is probably too much, a literature teacher in a village school.
      1. evgenm55
        evgenm55 25 January 2013 11: 55 New
        +4
        Have pity on the kids !!!!
      2. Vadivak
        Vadivak 25 January 2013 12: 00 New
        +3
        Quote: sergeybulkin
        literature teacher in a rural school.


        Mansurovo village, Kursk region, historical homeland.
        1. military
          military 25 January 2013 12: 11 New
          +1
          Quote: Vadivak
          Mansurovo village, Kursk region, historical homeland.

          you can ... that's just kids sorry ... crying
          1. Vadivak
            Vadivak 25 January 2013 12: 32 New
            +3
            Quote: military
            You can ... that's just kids sorry ..


            My friend returned from there, around the devastation, and in Mansurovo they are building mega-agro-industrial complex, because the hero’s homeland and a new school were apparently built with an eye
            1. military
              military 25 January 2013 12: 46 New
              +4
              Quote: Vadivak
              because the hero’s homeland and school built a new apparently with an eye

              it remains only to dig up the "hero" himself in the flower bed in front of the school ... on the shoulders ... drinks
  • Middle-brother
    Middle-brother 25 January 2013 09: 54 New
    +3
    In my opinion, DAM is a classic "world door ball". In addition to contempt, it no longer provokes emotions. For example, the president can be treated differently, but it is difficult not to respect him. Prime Minister ... Well, yes, you already know.
  • Bort radist
    Bort radist 25 January 2013 10: 01 New
    +2
    "WHERE could my honey go?
    After all, there was a full pot of pots! He could not escape
    After all, he has no legs! He could not swim down the river (he is without a tail and fins!)
    He could not dig into the sand! Could not ... but still was such !!!!
    He could not leave in the dark forest. Could not fly up to heaven!
    Could not, yet disappeared! Well, these are miracles! "(Arthur Milne)
    Read the classics, there are many answers to adult questions.
    PS Misha loves honey very much, ........ why, why does honey like him so much.
  • APASUS
    APASUS 25 January 2013 10: 09 New
    +4
    Yes !!!!!! Bear in his role!
    But what the media write:
    Dmitry Medvedev's mission in Davos failed. This is evidenced by the eloquent flight of investors from the audience, in which the Russian prime minister persistently refuted pessimistic forecasts of the development of the Russian economy.
  • Dr. Pilyulkin
    Dr. Pilyulkin 25 January 2013 10: 09 New
    +11
    But we have stability! laughing
  • sergeybulkin
    sergeybulkin 25 January 2013 10: 18 New
    +2
    Medvedev as president? So-so, neither fish is meat.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 25 January 2013 10: 33 New
      +3
      Quote: sergeybulkin
      So-so, neither fish is meat.

      Semolina.
  • Begemot
    Begemot 25 January 2013 10: 42 New
    0
    I do not like Medvedev, to say the least. But I feel sorry for him while he is still in power, but imagine what they will say about him after.
  • rus_ak_93
    rus_ak_93 25 January 2013 10: 50 New
    +1
    the flight of investors is a show to the "owners", we support you, but nobody wants to listen to the positive news, came to the starving people and treated them with candy or crackers wow, that’s a plus, and they will remember you for someone who has sweeter candy. But you have to return your own to Russia, let the money be taken back and invest, at least in ships and tanks, if only in ours.
  • nnnnnn
    nnnnnn 25 January 2013 11: 44 New
    +3
    Deputy Fedorov, who is a member of the budget and tax committee in the State Duma and who recently ran for the leaders of the United Russia faction, is sure that Russia is a US colony and that the State Department has real power in the country. Fedorov calls Putin “the leader of the national liberation movement,” which in recent years has been raising its head bolder and more challenging the invaders. According to Fedorov, all laws passed in the State Duma are written by Americans, and federal television channels deal exclusively with pro-American propaganda. Putin’s strategic speeches about Russian sovereignty on television, on the contrary, are heavily censored, he said.
    Fedorov is sure that the opposition is living at ease with the money of the State Department in Russia. According to unicorn, the movement "For Fair Elections" is a "modern punitive operation in the occupied territories." However, Putin and his "partisan detachment" managed to repel the American attack. Moreover, if not 150 thousand, but at least three million people came to Poklonnaya Gora in February, Russia would already be a free country, Fedorov is sure. http://nnm.ru/blogs/kenypro/cenzura-v-otnoshenii-putina-rabotaet-zhestko/#cut
    1. military
      military 25 January 2013 12: 07 New
      +3
      Quote: nnnnnn
      Fedorov calls Putin "the leader of the national liberation movement," which in recent years has been raising its head bolder and defying the invaders ... Putin’s strategic statements on Russian sovereignty on television, on the contrary, are heavily censored, the deputy said.

      "...Poor Yorick!...! fool
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 25 January 2013 12: 35 New
        +3
        Quote: military
        Fedorov calls Putin "the leader of the national liberation movement,"

        He's just crazy.
  • fenix57
    fenix57 25 January 2013 12: 29 New
    0
    Quote: Begemot
    and imagine that they will talk about him after.

    And after about him NO ONE WILL REMEMBER.. hi
  • Dmitry T.
    Dmitry T. 25 January 2013 12: 44 New
    +2
    Regarding the stabilization of the demographic situation, it seems to me that one “but” is hiding: an increase in the population (due to the birth rate) is due to the incessant flow of migrants. Or maybe I don’t understand what?
  • Chemist
    Chemist 25 January 2013 12: 50 New
    +1
    It seems that our kospodin prime minister sang his song.
    http://oko-planet.su/politik/politikrus/161479-konec-epohi-medvedeva-ili-
    igra-v-poddavki.html

    This is understood as the beginning of the overthrow of Medvedev and Co. in the cabinet of mysters.
  • Antikylller
    Antikylller 25 January 2013 14: 06 New
    +2
    When will this plush trendy be sent as ambassador to Zimbabwe? negative
  • MilaPhone
    MilaPhone 25 January 2013 14: 19 New
    0
    Medvedev Medvedev Medvedev -
    Duma butterfly where father looked.
    song Oleg Gazmanov
    1. mazaew
      mazaew 25 January 2013 23: 01 New
      0
      Well, they give him a bulbator? Well, right now the bulik blows-Russia ahead !!! And judging by the expression on the face, the bulik is not the first. The iconic figure of Dvorkovich in a tracksuit adds color.
  • AlSuGe777
    AlSuGe777 25 January 2013 15: 44 New
    0
    The economic forum in Davos mainly represents the interests of the “Western” system, which has great difficulties in building economic schemes for investing capital, due to the instability of the economies of the EU and the USA, and more recently, the open political aggression of Western countries towards Russia. This fact forces the GDP to refer to this forum as the next platform for pressure on Russia and, accordingly, not of great importance. Therefore, in Davos, DAM “represents” Russia, and GDP prefers China, India, Brazil, where it is really possible to establish more economic cooperation without any “buts”.
    P.S. LADY needs to dismiss its team and does not have to rely on its liberal mind; trust can only be earned with sincerity and truth.
  • 8 company
    8 company 25 January 2013 16: 09 New
    0
    And now the "bare" facts, without the "blah blah blah-all-plundered-and-sold out
    '

    -ZAO "TOMZEL" was established in 1998, produces about 40 types of electric drives. The average salary at the plant is more than 40 thousand rubles.

    -OAO "Uralkhimmash" (Yekaterinburg) won the tender of the Ukrainian PJSC "Ukrtatnafta" for the manufacture of column equipment. The equipment will be used to replace the exhausted columns and vacuum systems in the installation GK-3/1 No. 1 of the Kremenchug refinery.

    -Electrochemical machines of the Ufa enterprise "ESM" last year were sent to Western Europe and Japan.

    A branch of AEM Technologies CJSC in Volgodonsk (part of Rosatom's engineering division, Atomenergomash) shipped a hydrotreating reactor manufactured for the Ryazan Oil Refining Company (TNK-BP). This equipment will be part of the new isomerization unit of the oil refining complex in Ryazan.

    -OAO “Tver Carriage Building Plant” (part of Transmashholding CJSC) has completed work on the implementation of the contract with Federal Passenger Company OJSC, which is the main customer of TVZ OJSC. Within its framework, in 2012 a total of 378 passenger cars were manufactured.

    -According to the order of Atomenergomash OJSC, the Kolomensky Zavod developed and manufactured a set of diesel generator sets consisting of two DGU4000 with a capacity of 4000 kW and three DGU3200 with a capacity of 3200 kW, intended for reliable power supply of nuclear power plants in the event of a malfunction in external power supply.

    -OAO "Uralmashzavod" entered into an agreement with LLC "Cemek Minerals" (CEMEQ Minerals, Russia) for the supply of a 5,5x115 rotary kiln body for one of the enterprises in Central America. Delivery time is June 2013. “This contract is a breakthrough to the Central America’s new market for the plant,” said Andrei Saltanov, General Director of Uralmashzavod.

    According to the results of nine months of 2012, aggregated production growth in three engineering sectors amounted to almost 10% - the best indicator among all industries.

    Come on, bear on, push on! Ignore the information war on the part of infantile fans of Stalinism and fake reformers with Bolotnaya.
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 25 January 2013 17: 11 New
      +1
      Everything and everyone to the heap .... but more specifically, what kind of production was established with his participation from 2008 to 2012 for a year? (during his presidency)
    2. brutal true
      brutal true 25 January 2013 17: 33 New
      +1
      Quote: 8 company
      Come on, bear on, push on! Ignore the information war on the part of infantile fans of Stalinism and fake reformers with Bolotnaya.

      Kunstkamera, honestly. What views are there just.
    3. Vadivak
      Vadivak 25 January 2013 17: 38 New
      +3
      Quote: 8 company
      In 2012, a total of 378 passenger cars were manufactured.


      Cool per wagon per day, and - the annual need for new passenger cars - 1 - 000 pcs. The rest is the same


      Quote: 8 company
      Come on, bear on, push on!

      And he presses in the sense of burning
      The amount of fish consumed is a sign of the civilization of the state! We all went from a chip that comes from a fish chip!
      Rudeness or dissatisfaction on the part of patients with the actions of doctors should lead to a decrease in the money received by doctors!
      Indeed, for our citizens this is not yet familiar, but sometimes you listen to your grandmother, who has mastered credit terminology, and it becomes pleasant in my heart! (On loans for rural residents).
      You can give birth without money, but better with money!
      Of course, sad faces with golden chains, in raspberry-colored jackets are in the past, but it is possible to squeeze out a stranger from the local market with completely legitimate measures!

      And my favorite
      The state of the pharmaceutical industry is disgusting! Some crooks produce drugs, other crooks sell these drugs, and third crooks mediate using the funds of the state program!
      1. 8 company
        8 company 25 January 2013 18: 26 New
        0
        Quote: Vadivak
        Cool per wagon per day, and - the annual need for new passenger cars - 1 - 000 pcs. The rest is the same


        Then for some reason I remembered the assault on the clogged buses in Soviet times and the frantic lines at the railway ticket office. It’s not clear that in Soviet times, buses and wagons were produced thousands and millions of times more than with “corrupt medical courses,” one thing is not clear - where did they all disappear? As mysterious as the sausage from our dear city meat factory in Mogilev. Paradox: the plant plows, the products are shipped, but there are no meat products in the shops: no stews, no meat, no sausages. And so for decades. Wonderland, in kind. wink
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 25 January 2013 19: 29 New
          -1
          Quote: 8 company


          Don’t scare, I lived in Orsha before the army. In Belarus, everything was in order with food in stores.
          As for the queues, earlier tickets were cheap, not like an hour - half the salary and more ...
        2. Vadivak
          Vadivak 25 January 2013 22: 33 New
          +3
          Quote: 8 company
          one thing is not clear - where did they all disappear?

          Andrei, I don’t believe what you don’t understand.

          read here
          November 6, 2009 Refservice will sell cars for scrap. Refservice OJSC put up for auction more than 10% of its fleet - 1313 thermos-wagons and refsections with expired life.
          And in 90 new cars stupidly drove to the Baltic states and sold there
          May 10, 2012 Founded in 1998, Tolmets LLC is the largest Latvian and non-ferrous scrap metal processing company in Latvia and the Baltic States.
          Has the Sarkanays Metallurges plant worked in three shifts since
    4. Uncle
      Uncle 25 January 2013 18: 33 New
      +3
      Quote: 8 company
      Come on, bear on, push on!
      Andrei, do you ascribe some rise in industry to the merits of Medvedev? This time, in the electronic industry: the Research Institute Delta, the Chromatron plant and the Rubin plant in Moscow became shopping centers, this is only in their native Izmailovo, that is, there are NO MORE these plants.
      1. 8 company
        8 company 25 January 2013 22: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: Uncle
        Andrei, do you ascribe some rise in industry to the merits of Medvedev? This time, in the electronics industry:


        Dmitry, is Medvedev really to blame for the fact that we are many years behind the West in the field of electronics and are not able to compete in this field? It seems to me that someone lodged this lag back in the days of the struggle against "pseudoscience."
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 25 January 2013 22: 38 New
          +2
          Quote: 8 company
          is it really Medvedev's fault that we are many years behind the West in the field of electronics and are not able to compete in this field? It seems to me that someone lodged this lag back in the days of the struggle against "pseudoscience."


          For twenty years, China has managed to establish its own production of electronics and not only, but we all nod to a difficult legacy and which is very convenient, no one will respond to criticism
          1. 8 company
            8 company 26 January 2013 00: 08 New
            -1
            Quote: Vadivak
            China in twenty years managed to establish its own electronics production and not only


            Here, I managed. And who prevented us from doing the same in the 90s, when China did it? And in the 80s, who got in the way? In the 70s? In the 60s?
            Now at least something is being done. Product catalog of JSC Russian Electronics:
            http://catalogue.roselgroup.ru/
            1. Garrin
              Garrin 26 January 2013 00: 13 New
              +2
              Quote: 8 company
              And in the 80s, who got in the way? In the 70s? In the 60s?

              What is being stolen now? What do you think?
              1. 8 company
                8 company 26 January 2013 11: 57 New
                +1
                Quote: Garrin
                What is being stolen now? What do you think?


                I think that everything that could be stolen from the Soviet heritage was stolen in the first half of the 90s. After that, you can only steal previously stolen or steal a new one.
    5. Chamber No. 6
      Chamber No. 6 26 January 2013 12: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: 8 company
      Kolomensky Zavod designed and manufactured a set of diesel generator sets consisting of two DGU4000 with a capacity of 4000 kW and three DGU3200 with a capacity of 3200 kW, designed for reliable power supply of nuclear power plants in the event of a malfunction in external power supply.

      Kolomensky Zavod designed and manufactured these diesel generator sets in the early 80s, installing on Soviet diesel locomotives of the type 2TE121 (4000 kW) and 2TE116 (3200 kW) ...
      In other words, before dumping a bunch of facts into a post, maybe first try to establish their reliability?
      1. Rezun
        Rezun 26 January 2013 14: 28 New
        +1
        Chamber No. 6 I support! Until 1994, all control and measuring equipment was produced on a domestic basis.
  • sxn278619
    sxn278619 25 January 2013 18: 58 New
    +1
    M. KHAZIN - You see. This morning I conducted a program, in which I explained what had to be discussed on Davos. In the world economic crisis, it will be very tightened. It is necessary to discuss what the structure of the economy will be in 5-8 years. What will be the share of different sectors, the share of the financial sector, what will be the share of private demand, the share of the state and so on. That is, these things are really relevant. It is necessary to discuss, for example, the problem of what an asset is. Because 5 years ago, the action was cool, and after 5 years they will already give it in the face for it. This needs to be discussed. Instead, we are offered some kind of strange concept of sustainable dynamism, a survey: whether running protein in the squirrel wheel is sustainable dynamism.

    http://worldcrisis.ru/crisis/1061727
    http://worldcrisis.ru/crisis/wc_rsn_video
  • Ulysses
    Ulysses 25 January 2013 23: 34 New
    0
    The representation of Russia in Davos is not entirely clear.
    Kudrin, Gref.
    Who are these people???
    What do they have to do with the real economy?
  • stranik72
    stranik72 26 January 2013 12: 02 New
    +2
    Quote: 8 company

    Here, I managed. And who prevented us from doing the same in the 90s, when China did it? And in the 80s, who got in the way? In the 70s? In the 60s?
    Now at least something is being done. Product Catalog of Russian Electronics

    In the 90s, your fellow tribesmen for whom you are so vigorously "pushing themselves out" that is, liberals of all faiths under the governing and guiding role of world Zionism and naturally the venal elite, represented by Gorbachev, Yeltsin and some other people from the top of the Central Committee of the CPSU. About 60 ... 80 it’s not for you to speculate, in those years something was created that allows to this day to exist and be considered one of the world powers in the Russian Federation. And much of what is admired here in terms of weapons and military equipment is the basis of those great years.
  • patriot2
    patriot2 26 January 2013 12: 27 New
    0
    Everything is clear with Davos, nobody is going to invest in Russia, they are afraid to take risks!
    But in vain: who does not risk, he does not drink champagne!
  • phase 711
    phase 711 28 January 2013 08: 04 New
    0
    Medvedev is such a nasty nanoprivatization that you want to puke when you see his face. Napoleon, Mussolini and Obama in one bottle.
    What a step, and a turn of the head, and poses !!! What a greatness !!!
  • I think so
    I think so 28 January 2013 20: 42 New
    0
    Actually, there’s the road to this iPhone (Davos Club) ... let it grind to your heart's content ... anyway, it didn’t harm the country, as it was during the presidency ... A rare idiot ...
  • atk44849
    atk44849 31 January 2013 15: 11 New
    0
    its time to the sump!