An-124 "Ruslan" was not needed by the military

71
The resumption of the release of the world's largest An-124 serial transport aircraft is questionable. At the end of December 2012, the Russian Defense Ministry compiled a list of military transport aircraft that should be purchased for the needs of the Russian Air Force. With reference to its own sources in the military department and the aviation industry, the Vedomosti newspaper reported that the release of new modifications of the heaviest An-124-300 military aircraft, Ruslan, at the Ulyanovsk Aviastar enterprise was considered inexpedient.

Meanwhile, the "green light" was given to the production of Il-476 transport aircraft (Il-76MD-90А), and further work on the creation of the An-70, An-140Т and partially Il-112 aircraft was approved. According to the latest aircraft, the military put forward a number of requirements for the KLA to finalize its proposal. It is worth noting that even if Aviastar loses the contract for heavy transport workers Ruslan, he will have the largest stories Russian aviation industry contract for the supply of X-NUMX military transport aircraft Il-39 for the total amount of 476 billion rubles.

An-124 “Ruslan” today remains the world's largest serial cargo aircraft, although it was developed as early as 1982 in the Antonov Design Bureau.

Initially it was planned to use it for the transportation of mobile launchers of ICBMs, as well as heavy equipment and personnel, but now the aircraft mostly performs civilian tasks. In total for 20 production years 56 machines were assembled. An-124 capable of carrying up to 120-150 tons of cargo, 880 soldiers with full gear or 440 paratroopers. The total volume of its cargo compartment is more than 1000 cubic meters.
An-124 "Ruslan" was not needed by the military

The need to resume the production of heavy transport aircraft "Ruslan" first started talking in the middle of the 2000-s. The main reason for this decision was the obsolescence of the existing fleet of transport aircraft of this type, which are operated mainly by private companies Polet, Volga-Dnepr, Antonov Airlines and the need to replace them with new sides. Initially, the An-124 aircraft was designed with a flight resource in 7 500 hours (the planes were originally intended to be used less frequently), but by 2006, some of the released units managed to fly in on 15 000 hours.

In 2008, the audit company Ernst & Young and the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) jointly prepared a business plan, according to which it was planned to resume the production of An-124 aircraft. From this document it followed that the production of transport aircraft would be profitable when ordering from 40 aircraft worth 150-160 million dollars each. According to that plan, it was assumed that the Ulyanovsk enterprise "Aviastar" will produce 2 Ruslan aircraft a year, starting in 2012. However, these plans were never realized, and the start of production was postponed all the time - first to 2015, and then to 2016.

Currently, the KLA has options for the release of approximately An-70 124 aircraft, of which only 40 is likely to be issued with a firm order. At one time, a certain stake in ensuring the profitability of the production of a heavy transport aircraft was made at the Russian Defense Ministry, which was almost under compulsory purchase of about 20 similar aircraft for its own needs, which was envisaged by the state weapons program for the 2011-2020 years.

After that, the military did not make any concrete statements on this score, and in early 2012, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, arriving in Ulyanovsk and visiting Aviastar, spoke about the possibility of acquiring about 10 Ruslan aircraft by the Ministry of Defense. However, it seems that the military was not able to determine the tasks that were supposed to be solved by heavy transport aircraft in the Russian military transport aviation.

Refusal to purchase new An-124-300 can be interpreted in two ways. On the one hand, this decision of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation may indicate that the military could not decide on the range of tasks that the world's most heavy-duty aircraft should solve in the interests of the military. At the same time, for the existing tasks of the military transport aviation of Russia, it seems that the existing Ruslans are sufficient, the resource of which, after a comprehensive modernization, will be increased to 2030.

At one time, it was the inability to determine the range of tasks that the largest serial transport aircraft was supposed to perform, and caused the closure of its serial production, naturally against the background of the serious economic problems of Ukraine and Russia. In Ukraine, the production of An-124 was stopped in the middle of the 90-s of the last century, in Russia, the Ulyanovsk Aviastar was assembled by the last transport worker in 2003 year. Currently, the Russian military transport aviation has 22 "Ruslan". At the same time they are used very limited. So in 2009, only 4 of them flew, primarily handling government cargo.

On the other hand, the refusal to purchase An-124-300 simultaneously with the intention to purchase X-NUMX Il-39 aircraft with the possibility of increasing this order may indicate an attempt by the Russian Defense Ministry to support exclusively the domestic aircraft manufacturer (in the An-476 version of the equipment and engines of the Ukrainian production). In favor of this version, the process of reducing the dependence of Russian aviation (now mostly helicopter) on the components of Ukraine’s production can be attributed. However, Russia's interest in the Antonov An-124 and An-70 transport workers correlates poorly with this version.

At the same time, the Ulyanovsk aircraft manufacturer will not remain without work. Until the end of 2014, Avistar will repair the military Ruslans, and then move on to upgrading the 22 An-124 to the An-124-150M version. In Russia, only Aviastar-SP CJSC has the technology to produce these aircraft, which are still in demand on the international market for large-size and super-heavy air transportation. This modification involves the installation of a new avionics system, an increase in the aircraft’s carrying capacity to 150 tons and a reduction in the number of transport crew from 6 to 4 people. It is assumed that the modernization of "Ruslans" in the interests of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation will be used in the interests of restoring the release of An-124 of various modifications for commercial purposes.

It is worth noting that the aircraft has a commercial potential, which means there is also a hope that their release will nevertheless be resumed. To date, two companies dominate the heavy air traffic segment: the Russian Volga-Dnepr and the Ukrainian Antonov Airlines, which own the 10 and 7 Airplanes Ruslan, respectively. In the global market, these companies work together, providing their services through 2 joint ventures: Ruslan SALIS GmbH (strategic transportation for the EU and NATO), and Ruslan International (specializing in civilian transportation). 18 countries use the services of these campaigns, and the main customers are France and Germany.

According to the Berliner Zeitung newspaper, one flight of Ruslan from Germany to Afghanistan costs about 250 000 euros, and according to the owner of Motor Sich, Vyacheslav Boguslayev, one An-124 brings up to 200 million dollars in profit per year. This figure, of course, does not look realistic, but the demand for An-124 services is quite high. So in the first half of 2009, these aircraft transported about 52,5 thousand tons of various cargoes.

The global financial and economic crisis that has erupted virtually did not affect the market for the transportation of large-sized, non-standard cargoes, the volume of which is currently estimated at 1 billion dollars a year and is growing annually by about 10% in monetary terms. It is expected that by the year 2020 it will reach 3 billion dollars, and by the year 2030, according to the estimates of Volga-Dnepr, it may amount to 7 billion dollars. Based on this, the Russian air carrier predicts the need for Ruslans for 2030 for the year at the level of 80-100 aircraft.

At present, the Serval anti-terrorist operation is being conducted by the French armed forces in Mali. The An-124 Russian cargo aircraft also joined the operation, which was approved by the UN Security Council. The aircraft of the company Volga-Dnepr and OJSC 224 Flight Squad (this company is associated with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation) carry out the transfer to Mali of personnel and military equipment, including French helicopters. At the same time, this is an example of private commercial cooperation, since no official agreements were concluded by the Ministry of Defense with the French side.

The "224 flight squad" has a valid agreement with the French Ministry of Defense on the implementation of the transport of goods in their interests. This agreement was concluded in 2010 for a period of 5 years. If we talk about the company "Volga-Dnepr", then it is known as one of the key carriers of weapons. At the same time, all the crews of Russian aircraft, said Ruslan Pukhov, director of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies.

Interesting trucking "Ruslan":

In 1992, An-124 transferred tons of gold from 52 from the United Arab Emirates to Switzerland for a total amount of more than 230 million pounds.
In 1993, over three An-124 airplanes in Moscow, more than 300 tons of various cargoes were delivered to prepare the Michael Jackson concert.
In 2001, An-124 transported a railway locomotive from Canada to Ireland with a mass of 109 tons.
In April, 2005 was used to transport the Aksum obelisk to Ethiopia. The delivery was carried out in the 3 stages, during each of which a third of the monument was transported with a total weight of 160 tons and a length of 24 meters.
In the spring of 2011, the aircraft was used to deliver huge Putzmeister pumps to Japan. Each pump mounted on an 26-wheeled platform weighed more than 86 tons. These pumps were used to eliminate the consequences of the disaster at the Fukushima-1 NPP.

Information sources:
-http: //lenta.ru/articles/2013/01/17/ruslan
-http: //www.bbc.co.uk/russian/international/2013/01/130114_un_support_france_intervention.shtml
-http: //www.profi-forex.org/novosti-rossii/entry1008150101.html
-http: //www.aviastar-sp.ru/products_and_services/services/dorabotki_i_modernizatsiya
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. FID
    +12
    21 January 2013 10: 09
    Volga-Dnepr Airlines is going to revive the production of An-124 Ruslan airliners. The carrier, which has opened a hangar in Germany for the repair of these aircraft, is ready not only to repair them, but also to organize a piece production of air "trucks" here.

    Volga-Dnepr will implement a completely private project for the construction of the An-124 airliner, or "more precisely, a digital version of a heavy military transport aircraft," Group President Alexei Isaykin told RBC daily. “After ten years of futile attempts to do something in Russia, we want to enlist the support of the state, which will be interested in this project,” he said. According to him, Volga-Dnepr itself needs 60 aircraft with a capacity similar to the An-124 until 2030. Other airlines can place an order for another 200 aircraft.

    The source of RBC daily in the airline claims that the carrier is considering the start of unit production of liners in Leipzig from 2017-2018. In this case, the fuselage and chassis of the new project will be taken from the An-124, electronics from suppliers of the Boeing 747, engines General Electric.

    The talks about resuming the production of Ruslans have been going on for several years, but the process has hardly moved off dead center due to the lack of orders for these machines. In 2006, the Ministry of Defense announced that it could become a launch customer and buy 2020 An-20-124 by 100. Later, Dmitry Medvedev, as president, even gave an order to include Ruslans in the Defense Ministry's procurement plan until 2020. The amount required to launch production was unofficially named - $ 500 million. The United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) planned to begin deliveries of these military transport aircraft in 2014 and to produce three ships a year.

    At the end of December 2012, the military department declared it inexpedient to resume production of Ruslan. "At the end of last year, the Ministry of Defense refused to purchase An-124 aircraft," complains Alexey Isaikin. "As it turned out, the state has no funds for all projects."

    The resumption of production of the An-124 is interesting for the developer of the machine - the Antonov design bureau, assures the vice-president of Antonov State Enterprise Alexander Kiva. Antonov and Volga-Dnepr periodically hold negotiations to find a site, first of all, Russian or Ukrainian ones are considered. The official representative of the United Aircraft Corporation Olga Kayukova connects the resumption of production of the An-124 with the number of orders, primarily from government agencies.

    The German-Russian Economic Alliance, which includes both Leipzig Airport and Volga-Dnepr, with extensive connections in the European aerospace industry, will help in structuring this project and finding the necessary partners for it, says alliance manager Viktor Shmelkov. "Mastering the production of An-124 requires not only large financial investments, but also colossal organizational and legal work. Without the participation of the Antonov Design Bureau, which holds the technical documentation for the aircraft, it is not clear how to do this," the editor-in-chief of the magazine admits "Air Transport Review" Alexey Sinitsky. According to him, if you agree with the design bureau, then such an ambitious project can become attractive.
    1. +3
      21 January 2013 10: 29
      Some kind of paradox - the demand for the services of these aircraft is very large, but there are no orders for new aircraft. How so? What are they all looking at in Moscow? Companies operating An-124 would have already thrown together a dozen boards together and started building, and there you look and new customers will catch up, they will even buy it.
      The plane is good, I think not even all the modernization potential has yet been mastered.
      1. +3
        21 January 2013 10: 49
        Quote: Wedmak
        but there are no orders for new planes. How so?


        I think it’s more profitable to use junk than to buy a new one. For the new Ruslan costs a lot of grandmas.
        1. +3
          21 January 2013 10: 57
          Of course it’s worth it, only the aircraft has a service life, at least conceive, but you should probably think about what will happen when the fatigue of the supporting structures reaches its limit? And to build a new one is not a couple of months.
          If it's true how the Ruslans work at Volga-Dnepr .... there was a film about them. They don't sit idle for a day! And the resource is not endless ...
      2. FID
        +16
        21 January 2013 11: 16
        Quote: Wedmak
        Companies operating the An-124 would have already thrown together a dozen sides and began to build

        The principle of work of our CAPITALISTS: squeeze out ALL that is possible from Soviet technology and resell it with proceeds. Next - the grass does not grow.
        1. +2
          21 January 2013 11: 19
          Fucking capitalists ....
          1. sasha127
            +1
            21 January 2013 15: 05
            That's it worthless and not only. I’ll keep silent better.
      3. VAF
        VAF
        +2
        21 January 2013 15: 40
        Quote: Wedmak
        Some kind of paradox - the demand for the services of these aircraft is very large, but there are no orders for new aircraft. How so?


        Denis, and you ... guess from ONE time wassat .

        I’ll even hint ... wink

        On January 11, 2013, the first flight of the Boeing C-17A Globemaster III heavy military transport aircraft built for India (serial number F-253 / IAF-1, Indian tail number) took place at the factory airfield of the Boeing corporation in Long Beach, California SV-8001).
        The plane was pumped out of the workshop on December 7, 2012. Upon completion of testing, the machine should be transferred to the Indian Air Force in June 2013.




        The contract for the purchase in the United States of ten heavy military transport aircraft Boeing C-17A Globemaster III through Foreign Military Sales (FMS) was signed by the Government of India on June 13, 2011.
        All ten aircraft should be delivered in 2013-2015.
        At a cost of $ 4,1 billion, this agreement became the largest Indian military purchase in the United States, marking a further strengthening of US positions in the Indian defense market.
        India is currently negotiating an additional purchase of six more S-17A aircraft.

        And before ..... it was only ours .... "patrimony" crying

        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          21 January 2013 15: 42
          Quote: vaf
          And before ..... it was only ours .... "patrimony"


          Well, with ... "tankers" .. you know the same? wassat crying



          The European Airbus concern will sign a contract with India for the supply of six A330MRTT tanker aircraft to equip the Air Force.
          These aircraft will be used to refuel in the air fighters deployed in the north-east of the country on the border with China.

          The A330MRTT was put up for competition at the lowest price, which allowed it to prevail over its competitor, the Russian IL-78, in terms of operating costs.

          Six new aircraft will complement the fleet of six IL-78s, which are in service with the Indian Air Force, and will fulfill the tasks of refueling Su-30MKI and Mirage-2000 fighters.
          European-made air tankers will be based in Panagarh (West Bengal).

          1. 0
            21 January 2013 16: 37
            vaf, but why go far? Kazakhstan purchased the European C-295 transporters.
        2. +1
          21 January 2013 15: 46
          Eh .... we are messy. However, this is a kind of kick in the ass for us - there is nothing to rest on our laurels, we relaxed. It is necessary to expand the range of models and improve the quality of service.
    2. 0
      21 January 2013 10: 47
      It turns out that by 2017, in the company of Ruslan and the C-5 Galaxy, something else will be added, while we will divide the lard with the Ukrainians? This is not right.
    3. 0
      21 January 2013 10: 59
      What about Mriya?
      PS
      1. +1
        21 January 2013 11: 12
        And only one copy of it remained. This is a completely specialized aircraft - it was created to transport components of the Energia-Buran system. Where is Buran with Energy now, you know .... And the operation of the An-225 as an ordinary transport aircraft is very, very expensive.
        1. smprofi
          +2
          21 January 2013 13: 01
          Quote: Wedmak
          This is a very specialized aircraft.

          you're not quite right. Yes, it was largely created for the Buran program, but Mriya can also be used as a simple transport vehicle. which, in general, is being successfully done. Yes, it's expensive, but the An-225 "Mriya" can do what others simply cannot do, either in terms of size or weight of the cargo.
      2. FID
        +5
        21 January 2013 11: 14
        Mriya is only one. To finish building the second, Antonov simply does not have enough money. Antonov generally does not have enough money for anything. There was hope for cooperation with the Russian Federation, but .....
        1. +10
          21 January 2013 11: 27
          Oh beauty is what ...

          And this, if not mistaken, is also Mriya?
          1. +1
            21 January 2013 11: 39
            It seems like yes ... 2-th unfinished board?
            1. +1
              21 January 2013 11: 42
              Likely. Just rolled out to the site, and it will rot ... From a bourgeois resource photo. Here's another

    4. +1
      21 January 2013 13: 00
      The Volga does not need Ruslan in its current form with domestic engines and avionics that can’t compete in terms of noise, etc. with competitors, namely Boeing — that’s why the Volga supports Ruslan with imported components and a detailed modernized project
      Now the flight hour cost $ 34000
      To the topic, My New Ruslans are not needed due to the fact that the existing fleet of 22 cars is practically not used and 20 more are late and contain 42 heavyweights as an expensive pleasure

      It’s not sad, but it’s true — my opinion should be given to the development of conventional WTAs and the replacement of obsolete AHs with more advanced and safer cars should begin, the Kazakhs have already received 2 new Spanish S-295m from Airbus
      1. FID
        +4
        21 January 2013 13: 34
        Quote: Rustam
        It’s not sad, but it’s true — my opinion should be given to the development of conventional WTAs and the replacement of obsolete AHs with more advanced and safer cars should begin, the Kazakhs have already received 2 new Spanish S-295m from Airbus

        This aircraft can only replace the An-26. Then, following your logic, you need to buy A-400M, S-130, S-5, etc.
        1. +1
          21 January 2013 13: 50
          My logic is that you don’t need to order a monster - when 22 of them are idle
          S-130-Why when there is an order for 34 new 476
          But the obsolete An It is yes - C-295 or C-27j excellent replacement create a joint venture and forward, but we are offered crafts like an70 or 112 at unbelievable prices
          20 trillion is a tidbit and the KLA will not allow anyone to crumbs the enemy

          And the Kazakhs have chosen the best offer on the market (after the Ana accident) they will continue to purchase foreign WTA
          1. FID
            +3
            21 January 2013 13: 53
            A country that DOES NOT HAVE ITS OWN aviation industry (generally industry, but the aviation industry and cosmonautics in particular) cannot claim the title GREAT.
            1. 0
              21 January 2013 15: 38
              this slogan a la 70th and has nothing to do with our BTA-Do you think you need to buy for example VAZ cars ?? Instead of foreign cars

              own industry is filling up already signed contracts, exposing unthinkable price tags there
              and we need airplanes now

              Aurbus S-235/295 aircraft are operated with success in 16 countries and the number of customers is constantly increasing
              even India, tired of the interruptions in spare parts for our miracle aircraft, announced a tender for the supply of 56 c-295 at a price of 2,2 billion dollars, before that the IL-78 lost the A330 MRTT competition since Aurbus offered the lowest price for its aircraft, the cost of the contract 1,5, XNUMX billion dollars
              3) even India is slowly abandoning our miracle planes and helicopters
              buying AH-64D instead of raw MI-28N, Ordering Chinook instead of Mi-26, buying S-17, buying S-130, buying A330 MRTT, buying the latest marine Poseidon from Boeing, as well as ordering French Rafale instead of MIG-35 - Increasing order up to 189 units
              4) Ruslan’s production with our engines and avionics is also recognized as unprofitable, and with imported components everything is with both hands

              but we buy the AN-140 with a poor cabin and our border guards fly on obsolete AN-72 which are not all-weather and not round-the-clock - the Kazakhs have chosen the best offer on the market so that in the future without bothering to the same place after the AN-72 accident, their choice is obvious
              our grandmothers will share the grief with UAC managers offering non-competitive projects at unbelievable prices

              what do we have now

              a) Ruslans in the amount of 22 units are practically idle and buying 20 new ones for what ?? maintenance costs the budget a round sum
              b) order 34 new 476 okay more or less modern aircraft
              c) Going further, we have the obsolete AN-12,24,26,72P which in return
              crafts like AN-70 or IL-112 -which is not

              create a joint venture and produce beautiful cars - these are jobs and production upgrades

              ps I'm not against our planes, but I'm for decent samples
              The c-295 is a decent car and it’s a fact, and I want our pilots to fly the best airplanes, because in the 21st century, even digital cockpits (for example) are like a standard in the West without a buyer even talking to you

              and it infuriates that our freaks with the KLA are giving out obsolete equipment for know-how by setting unthinkable price tags - and the workers both received a penny and get it - and once again what prevents the joint ventures from the same Airbas will

              1. +3
                21 January 2013 16: 03
                Quote: Rustam
                do you think you need to buy for example VAZ cars?

                Yes! We must buy domestic products for the needs of the state, not only the Moscow Region, even if they are more expensive and worse, but this is the country's security in the field of technology ... following your logic, we have almost lost civil aviation.
                1. +1
                  21 January 2013 17: 24
                  following your logic, we have almost lost civil aviation
                  ___________________
                  we already lost it - no one needs our airplanes without the participation of western firms in projects

                  offer to buy crafts from the brothers Slavs AN
                  or how many our pilots fly on obsolete BTA aircraft how many 10,20 years ??? we are now talking about the BTA
                  What prevents you from creating joint ventures and reviving our plants ??
              2. +1
                21 January 2013 16: 28
                Quote: Rustam
                but we buy the AN-140 with a wretched cabin and our border guards fly on obsolete AN-72 which are not all-weather and not round-the-clock - the Kazakhs chose the best offer on the market so that in the future they would not bother to the same place after the AN-72 accident their choice is obvious

                This is a 10000% guarantee of remote "open".
                Do not forget that "they are good" from the fact that "we are bad."
                And AERBAS and Boeing are very good at lobbying their interests.
                Our cars, as if they were not economical. "NAFIK" is not needed there.
              3. phantom359
                +1
                21 January 2013 22: 27
                Rustam, So what is it better ?. I do not understand. Then, in your opinion, you need to take the Americanos armor. For example, M113 (its submodifications). He is so advertised. In fact - an aluminum coffin. I especially like the placement of fuel tanks under the landing seats, something they wouldn’t relax, they always remembered what they were in.
                1. 0
                  21 January 2013 22: 49
                  Here I am talking about the BTA! That instead of the obsolete AN 12,24, 26,72p, what? And inappropriately distort
                  1. phantom359
                    0
                    22 January 2013 01: 31
                    Rustam,You understood me wrong. Old equipment needs to be changed unambiguously, only to its own, and not imported. It can get out sideways.
                  2. Scythian 35
                    0
                    2 May 2013 18: 02
                    An -70 obsolete fake. Sorry, why did the airbus copy it almost with a ruler and clicked on the newer Airbus A400M, and even the location of the engine screws, although they hadn’t used these types of engines for some reason !!!!!!
                    More than a hundred S-5s are in service with the US Air Force and they are not coplexed in this regard.
          2. +4
            21 January 2013 13: 53
            And you did not forget that together with An-70 we will receive documentation for it and it will be issued with us? This is the first. The second is that amers can certainly sell airplanes cheaper, but their maintenance will result in huge amounts. And nobody is safe from bookmarks.
            1. FID
              +5
              21 January 2013 14: 01
              Quote: Wedmak
              but their service will result in huge amounts

              That's right! But our a / c, for some reason, go to unjustified expenses, and lease imported airplanes (however, both Boeing and Airbus pay 10% of the commission to the person who signed the contract). Therefore, the prices for airline tickets are the most expensive (Moscow-Ufa-Moscow costs 450 euros, you can fly all over Europe for this money) - an expensive aircraft service is laid.
    5. +2
      21 January 2013 13: 33
      A-380 flies!
      Now, relying on his experience, the AN-124 will create the A-500 and "knee-deep" will be put on "Volga-Dnepr" with "Antonov" and our "businessmen" will be sent ...
      Although quite a few "our" specialists had a hand in the creation of the A-380.
      And the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, represented by the state, needs to order vessels of the Ruslana class
      1. 0
        21 January 2013 13: 50
        This is someone from "our specialists" offended for the quotation marks above OUR or the employees of "Volga-Dnepr" with "Antonov", started to minus ???
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          21 January 2013 15: 25
          Quote: Papakiko
          This is someone from "our specialists" offended for the quotation marks above OUR or the employees of "Volga-Dnepr"


          For quotation marks is unlikely, since everything is in the "topic", but at the beginning you had in the commentary ... A-400. but this .. "lapse" wink

          Because A-400M is produced ... commercially!

          The company Aurbus Military (part of the European association EADS) in a press release dated January 15, 2013 announced that at its plant in Seville (Spain), upon completion of the full painting, the first serial copy of the European military transport aircraft A400 Atlas (serial number MSN7).
          The aircraft was painted by the French Air Force, to which it should be transferred "at the end of the second quarter of 2013.



          In total, Aurbus Military currently has 174 firm orders for the A400M:
          - 50 for France,
          - 53 for Germany,
          -27 for Spain,
          -22 for the UK,
          - 10 for Turkey,
          -7 for Belgium,
          -4 for Malaysia.
          - 1 for Luxembourg.
          In 2013, in addition to the first MSN7 serial aircraft, it is planned to supply customers with three more serial aircraft: aircraft with serial numbers MSN8 and MSN10 - in France, and with serial number MSN9 - in Turkey.
          1. +2
            21 January 2013 16: 22
            I know about the A-400 (AN-12) in the Ishpansky "skin", I let my finger down and pressed the wrong button. I immediately saw the current and subjected it to "ISHRAVIT".
            1. VAF
              VAF
              0
              21 January 2013 17: 18
              Quote: Papakiko
              I know about the A-400 (AN-12) in the ISHPAN "skin",


              And again not .. "very true" wink Not An-12, but An-70 wink

              Quote: Papakiko
              Finger let down and pressed the wrong button. I immediately saw the current and subjected it to "ISHRAVIT".


              I saw, but you asked a question, I answered, + hi
              1. 0
                22 January 2013 10: 02
                AN-70 grew out of AN-12.
                The concept itself and the dimensions are very close.
                Therefore, I did not compare with "Ilya Muromets". hi
      2. Lee
        Lee
        +1
        21 January 2013 19: 29
        Quote: Papakiko
        A-380 flies!

        Recently, not very successful.
    6. VAF
      VAF
      0
      21 January 2013 14: 00
      Quote: SSI
      Volga-Dnepr will implement a completely private project for the construction of the An-124 airliner


      Seryoga, hello! Well ... you can say ... started ... "the beginning of the big end" ??? crying



      And we will be soon as in the photo .... wassat the upper plane is at the PARTICIPANT, but the lower (its display) is for us in the BTA wassat
      1. FID
        +1
        21 January 2013 14: 09
        Great, Serge! Yes, soon there will be no aviation at all. Who needs it? To all one answer - BUY.
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          21 January 2013 14: 57
          Quote: SSI
          Yes, soon there will be no aviation at all. Who needs it? To all one answer - BUY.


          Everything goes to this ,! Already buy and in all wassat



          And .. "the freshest acquisition" ... all the same Volgo-Dnepr!

  2. 0
    21 January 2013 11: 10
    it’s necessary to do 500 passenger seats on the basis of Ruslan, or you can make a flying palace or a cruise plane ...
    1. +2
      21 January 2013 11: 17
      Impossible fantasies ... it's like making a passenger bus out of a cargo truck. IL-96-400, here you have a beautiful cruise plane. Already ready. Trim just check at the factory. smile
      1. FID
        +3
        21 January 2013 11: 39
        Quote: Wedmak
        IL-96-400, here's a wonderful cruise

        There are only 5 of them, the UAC is in no hurry to build these machines and, according to rumors, is going to sell documentation on the IL-96-300 / 400 to China. Business in Russian!
        1. +3
          21 January 2013 11: 42
          Absolutely stupefied ??? Why isn’t he going to build something? According to LTX it seems to be better than 86.
          As an unfinished superjet they’re so bought, but as a wide-body one, it’s better to have a Boeing ... sad
          1. FID
            +4
            21 January 2013 11: 50
            Quote: Wedmak
            Absolutely stupefied ??? Why isn’t he going to build something? According to LTX it seems to be better than 86.
            As an unfinished superjet they’re so bought, but as a wide-body one, it’s better to have a Boeing ...

            Here is information that may partially explain the state of affairs in our aviation industry:


            GSS reinstates to pay debts



            The total financial debt of Sukhoi Civil Aircraft at the end of 2012 amounted to about $ 1 billion. All this money was taken on credit for the development and implementation of the Sukhoi SuperJet-100 program. However, the SCA alone is still not able to repay this debt to creditors. The Superjet program is still far from self-sufficiency, and the GSS simply does not have its own free funds.

            In such a situation, one of its leading aircraft manufacturing companies decided to lend a helping hand to the state. Namely - to provide a loan exactly for the amount of debt. The decision on this was made by the Government of the Russian Federation on the last working day of the year 2012. According to Decree No. 2619-r, Vnesheconombank will open a credit line in the amount of one billion dollars with a subsequent repayment period of 12 years in favor of the SSS.

            It is noteworthy that neither the SCA nor the Government even tried to hide the real reasons for the state loan, although borrowing to pay overdue debts is already a very negative signal in relation to a particular company. But what to do when the situation simply requires you to do so. Whether any other money will be allocated is not reported. Perhaps, in addition to the debts available today, the SCA does not intend to attract new ones, and is able to further develop solely through its own financing. This would be nice for both the company and the SuperJet-100 project.
            1. +2
              21 January 2013 11: 56
              I do not quite understand how the sale of aircraft documentation can help. And about Sukhoi, my opinion has changed sad - they would have less promoted their superjet, and more would have been brought to condition. Or they wouldn’t have climbed into civil aviation at all, ILs and Tu were always strong in civilian life, and dry and instantly militarily.
              1. FID
                0
                21 January 2013 12: 43
                Simply, all the money budgeted for aviation goes to super. There is simply not enough money for the development of production. KLA and Poghosyan will not allow anything to develop, nor any other project. Better to sell documentation than do construction. Something like that, I think. I support the idea of ​​Sukhoi military aircraft and the worthlessness of entering civilian life.
      2. +2
        21 January 2013 13: 07
        there is a bus at the base of Kamaz
        1. +2
          21 January 2013 13: 17
          Well, does he look like a truck? You may not understand. There, a man offered to put chairs in the 124 cargo compartment and read the fun ... No, there is such an option for those accompanying the cargo. But how long will you stare at solid metal? Cut through the portholes? Put people on three floors? Attach a mini pool there? Roulette? Baroque apartment? Yeah ... so, where else would you take herbs .... wassat
          1. FID
            +3
            21 January 2013 13: 32
            The fuselage is designed only for the carriage of goods. To make a passenger option is to do the plane again. There is no point.
  3. +1
    21 January 2013 11: 11
    Yeah beautiful colossus, mine are the only aircraft with such performance characteristics
  4. +1
    21 January 2013 11: 21
    Would mind to reconsider ALL the decisions taken by the stool during his activities on the collapse of the army. Since the vast majority of them are little inadequate, they are also criminal. in particular, the liquidation of military hospitals has led to an increase in mortality among the personnel of the Ministry of Defense, especially conscripts, even from banal colds. And what will happen if, God forbid, a military conflict? Same thing with airplanes. Yesterday they refused, today they did not change their minds, and tomorrow it will be too late to bite your elbows.
  5. SIT
    +3
    21 January 2013 11: 24
    This is clearly some kind of systemic failure of the entire military department as a whole. What topic do not take at least about small arms, at least about infantry fighting vehicles, at least about transport aviation everywhere the same red thread - there is no well-thought-out, developed on the basis of some unified concept of warfare, a technical task for development from a military customer. The adopted military doctrine of the Russian Federation does not make it possible to clearly and clearly formulate neither the requirements for the organizational structure of the troops nor the requirements for military equipment. I noticed one good tradition among our sworn friends. Before the assignment of the next officer rank, the applicant is sent to a private for a month under the supervision of a professional "teacher" with the rank of sergeant, who again explains to the future commander what a soldier's strap is and what sweat and blood it costs if the commander turns out ...! Can our MO to hell also send to run in the fields under the command of a thread of a non-commissioned officer who will take out their whole soul from them? Maybe they have something clear in their heads with strategic planning? Indeed, even, as K. Raikin said, from the point of view of formal logic and banal erudition, given the length of the country for 10 km, the low throughput of railways and the actual absence of highways, heavy-duty transport aviation is the only chance to have time to transfer at least some heavily armed units to the newly formed hot spot or God forbid a full-fledged theater of operations.
  6. +5
    21 January 2013 11: 33
    when the USSR was everything was needed and now there is nothing! hi
  7. Nechai
    +10
    21 January 2013 11: 39
    "The refusal to buy new An-124-300s can be interpreted in two ways. ... that the military have not been able to determine the range of tasks that the world's most cargo-carrying aircraft should solve in the interests of the military."
    This is not the military NOT DEFINED. Why put a shadow on the fence! The range of issues to be resolved by Ruslan was determined at the stage of creation. They have been REMOVED by the political leadership from the agenda. And about mobile military connections in real life, only a trend, nothing more. The main "drawback" of the An-124 is the FLIGHT RANGE and LOADING CAPACITY. For it creates, albeit hypothetical, but the likelihood of a l / s arriving to celebrate Airborne Forces Day in the capital of their motherland - the city of Washington ... And even more so it is "impossible" to build up the Russian Air Force Air Force to the level of the Soviet Air Force Air Force when in one plane The Airborne Division could be deployed to any theater of operations. For this will violate the principle of the limited combat capability of the RF Armed Forces.
  8. +1
    21 January 2013 11: 42
    I don't understand the RF Ministry of Defense at all. Some kind of nonsense. Each district should have its own AN-124 regiment. And another regiment of the Supreme Command Reserve. In total, at least 150 aircraft. And 2 regiments AN-225 "Mriya" need to have. Such aircraft are the mobility of troops. This is NATO's complete dependence on the issue of cargo transportation. These are huge resources for building an industry.
    Question as with footcloths. No one in the world refuses knives. Bow and arrows, poisons of natural origin are used. And we have the 21st century in the yard.
    1. +2
      21 January 2013 11: 45
      Each district should have its own AN-124 regiment. And another regiment of the reserve of the Supreme Command. In total, at least 150 aircraft. And 2 regiments AN-225 "Mriya" need to have

      Not too much? After all, they still need to be serviced. In peacetime, the 476-e will completely cope with the delivery of goods, and the AN-124 are already heavy vehicles. What will the MO carry on them?
      1. Eric
        +2
        21 January 2013 18: 17
        You, Comrade, would look at the latest trends. The withdrawal of NATO troops from Afghanistan, the war in Mali and Syria. Personnel and cargo access to the African continent from anywhere in the world, transfer of private sector cargo to the Far East, from the Far East (China / Japan) and even we will assign India here - and all this to Europe. You understand one thing: the Russian Federation has an option to develop a transport cluster between Asia and the Old World. This is unthinkable money, as one of the options for the world division of labor dictates. And I remind you that aviation is a high-tech industry, which in turn draws both metallurgy and mechanical engineering and electronics.

        In the West, the sphere of defense and its achievements, a long-profitable business, that same notorious unification. So, it’s okay if the Defense Ministry can also make money on their planes and the pilots get flight hours, the experience we need so much. The only question is frames.

        As one person said, “the most conservative body is the head,” that is, without a change in consciousness, many good undertakings will not only fail to develop, but will not even pass the stage of preliminary design.

        PS: The civilian freight market is only growing, even during the crisis of the global economy.
        1. 0
          21 January 2013 19: 01
          And where does the trend? Are we going to attack someone? We do not need to bring tanks to another continent.
          But below, the person (Kuryanin) gave a sensible idea - to create state the company, equip it with An-124, IL-476, and maybe An-225, and provide international services for the transportation of bulky goods. From us state. guarantees of cargo delivery, serviceability of aircraft, their maintenance, and we have money. Delivery of cargo to areas where landing is not possible is possible - by parachute landing method. So .. there would be a desire.
        2. Eric
          +2
          21 January 2013 20: 50
          What is minus for? laughing
          1. Eric
            +1
            22 January 2013 00: 28
            Who puts the cons !? Argument, otherwise your point of view risks drowning in my "stupidity"! lol
          2. VAF
            VAF
            +1
            22 January 2013 01: 00
            Quote: Eric
            What is minus for?


            Do not worry, everywhere +! You write everything correctly! drinks
    2. +4
      21 January 2013 12: 17
      Lord, the regiment of the 124th on the district ... Give you tovarisch, give power, the whole country will walk without trousers, but Ana-124 will rot at the airfields. Where are you going to fly, dear? Why do you need "mobility of troops"? The "small mobile army" scheme in itself is deadly for Russia. No one will allow you to transfer 1000 tanks to ZABVO during a threatened period - it is necessary, as in Soviet times, to build up heavy weapons there IN ADVANCE. To transfer an airborne division at a time? maybe the Ministry of Defense took over the mind, because all this fuss with the Anas is a purely political kitchen, you need to modernize the existing 124s and 76s, bring to mind and build 476s and 112s, close the program of the 70s and 140s x as duplicating their ...
      1. FID
        +3
        21 January 2013 13: 06
        Excuse me, 112 not a single one was built. What are you going to bring to mind? They will sell the modernized 124 military units to the Volga-Dnepr and Polet and they will end there. That's all.
      2. Avenger711
        -1
        23 January 2013 02: 22
        Well, at least outwardly the An-140 will be more poetical than the ML-112. :)
    3. Avenger711
      0
      21 January 2013 20: 19
      I will disappoint you, but the Yankees of similar C-5s built 70+ pieces in total and there are simply no civilians among them.

      About An-225 more than 3-4 aircraft for unique cargo, even in the USSR did not speak.
  9. Nechai
    +1
    21 January 2013 12: 21
    Quote: Wedmak
    Not too much? What will the MO carry on them?

    Denis, l / s will carry. In order to lead to a normal OSH battle, skills on the one hand and the state of armament, etc. on storage bases. Do you think that the worked out real ability of the RF Armed Forces to really quickly build up a group in any border region of the country, will at least cool down the boiling brain of an adversary or not?
    And do not forget that one of the initial destinations of these strongmen is the ICBM AIR START, before arriving at the l / s loading aerodrome. If the Saxons are boiling water from the BZHRK ..., then from this they generally go nuts. And their efforts with the environment around us missile defense, attempts and stay ...
    1. +1
      21 January 2013 12: 35
      And do not forget that one of the initial destinations of these strongmen is the ICBM AIR START

      I read about such a project, but it seems that he did not get out of the state of experiments. We stopped at the delivery of tactical missiles.
      But nevertheless, the main purpose of heavy transporters is to deliver equipment and weapons to the desired area, landing. But at present, mass landings are not effective. The development of MLRS and tactical missiles has come to the point that they will make bloody mess from the landing in 5 minutes after the landing of this landing.
      And in itself, the concentration of troops can cause tension in the region.
      Now the war has passed and the distant principle - first the Kyrgyz Republic, long-range aviation, attack aircraft, then artillery and off we go.
      If the Saxons are boiling water from the BZHRK ... then from this they generally go nuts. And their efforts with the environment around us missile defense, attempts and stay ...

      How much can such a transporter be in the air? 3-4 hours, not more? YES is much more effective. And let the ICBMs stand in the mines and carry submarines, it’s more reliable.
      1. SIT
        +2
        21 January 2013 13: 48
        Quote: Wedmak
        And in itself, the concentration of troops can cause tension in the region. Now the war has passed and the distant principle - first the Kyrgyz Republic, long-range aviation, attack aircraft, then artillery and off we go.

        Starting with the artillery, and especially what "went, went" how will it end up there? There, on the Trans-Siberian Railway, several carriages derailed and people sat in droves at the stations, sunbathing for days. This is without any war and saboteurs. Roads in the north in April will be closed for heavy goods vehicles. the thawed canvas does not hold them and in a week they will turn the road to gravel. I'm not even talking about all sorts of sunny places like Magadan and Chukotka and Kamchatka, where, as in the song "you can only fly by plane." It's too long to stomp there on the sea.
        1. +1
          21 January 2013 13: 55
          IL-476. A few dozen were ordered. And they won’t stand, such tonnage is in great demand.
  10. +1
    21 January 2013 13: 03
    Multipurpose aerospace system MAKS - this is what "MRIYA" is for!
    MAX has undeniable advantages over existing launch vehicles:

    Lower cost of putting payloads into orbit (~ $ 1000 / kg) compared to single-use launch vehicles (~ 12000-15000 US $ / kg) and first-generation reusable launch vehicles (Buran, USSR and Space Shuttle ", USA);
    The ability to run in any direction;
    Possibility of launching into orbits with the necessary phasing and parallax along the departure aerodrome;
    Possibility of wide maneuvering in the longitudinal and lateral planes when returning from orbit;
    Efficiency of application;
    The ability to return payloads and their reuse;
    Ability to return MAX when canceling a launch;
    Ecological cleanliness (reduction of the falling fields of steps and non-toxic fuel components).
  11. +4
    21 January 2013 14: 09
    I believe that 40 pieces should be built. Both military and civilian fit. Let the state be created. the structure of a civilian carrier company and makes money for the state. And then they gave everything to private owners and it is not profitable for them to buy new ones. We will look back at them without aviation and we will remain designers.
    1. Eric
      +1
      21 January 2013 18: 23
      You got ahead of me, above the same thing answered the man. hi
  12. Krasnoyarsk
    -1
    21 January 2013 15: 42
    Gentlemen, kitchen experts, do you really consider yourself smarter than the military in the general staff?
    1. +3
      21 January 2013 15: 49
      There was recently one person with the rank of "Minister of Defense". Soooo smart .... I would sit for another couple of years and compare us and the General Staff would be absurd ... due to the absence of a General Staff.
      And here, not all sofa experts. There are people who know all this kitchen from the inside.
      1. +3
        21 January 2013 16: 12
        There was recently one person with the rank of "Minister of Defense". Soooo smart
        ____________
        You correctly noted that it used to be even smarter that, together with the beginnings of the Moscow armament (it was such), we all overwhelmed the 2001-2008 armament program that in Georgia we saw the works of their fruitful activity

        I also remember the statement of one _a who told me my question why you do not like them = answer Anyway, buy and at the price that we will tell you
  13. toguns
    0
    21 January 2013 15: 45
    wassat Well, a nagging lit even I do not know what to say ...
    although I’ve come up with something to say to skeptics, if we started mass-producing (I honestly didn’t believe it) to produce the Su-35s, Su-34 and we are preparing for the acceptance of the Pak-fa, then the transporters will not run away from us anywhere.
    My personal opinion, all the problems with transporters are due to the fact that customers do not actually know what they themselves want.
    1. FID
      +6
      21 January 2013 16: 16
      What do you think, Yaroslav, how much can a worker stay without a salary? Su-35 and Su-34 make other plants. And they are alive, since they worked for export. I have already written more than once that only export-oriented factories live. On Aviastar, workers engaged in the production of the An-124, where will they go? The order for IL-476 has not yet been issued (yes .... 40 cars for Aviastar - this is - 5 years of work, and then what?), They do not build anything else (Tu-204 and Tu-204CM are not ordered). About 40 thousand workers worked in the USSR on Aviastar (should have worked). Now:


      The state again decided to place orders at the Ulyanovsk Aviastar plant. During the years of “reforms”, its staff was reduced by 4 times, and production fell dozens of times. Workers here receive 8-12 thousand rubles, but this salary seems good to them, since there is no other job in the city. Information on Aviastar is given at the beginning of 2012.
      At the moment, the company employs about 10 thousand people, and employment is closed. This serves as some reason for pride, they say, everyone really wants to work for us, but there are no vacancies. In fact, for the deeply depressed Ulyanovsk, unemployment (including hidden) is a very big problem. Although the salaries at the plant do not inspire much enthusiasm.

      Why not be a skeptic. And I'm on Aviastar quite often. People leave, and building airplanes is not a brickwork. Here another skill is needed!
  14. toguns
    0
    21 January 2013 17: 10
    [
    Quote: SSI
    What do you think, Yaroslav, how much can a worker stay without a salary? Su-35 and Su-34 make other plants. And they are alive, since they worked for export. I have already written more than once that only export-oriented factories live. On Aviastar, workers engaged in the production of the An-124, where will they go? The order for IL-476 has not yet been issued (yes .... 40 cars for Aviastar - this is - 5 years of work, and then what?), They do not build anything else (Tu-204 and Tu-204CM are not ordered). About 40 thousand workers worked in the USSR on Aviastar (should have worked). Now:


    The state again decided to place orders at the Ulyanovsk Aviastar plant. During the years of “reforms”, its staff was reduced by 4 times, and production fell dozens of times. Workers here receive 8-12 thousand rubles, but this salary seems good to them, since there is no other job in the city. Information on Aviastar is given at the beginning of 2012.
    At the moment, the company employs about 10 thousand people, and employment is closed. This serves as some reason for pride, they say, everyone really wants to work for us, but there are no vacancies. In fact, for the deeply depressed Ulyanovsk, unemployment (including hidden) is a very big problem. Although the salaries at the plant do not inspire much enthusiasm.

    Why not be a skeptic. And I'm on Aviastar quite often. People leave, and building airplanes is not a brickwork. Here another skill is needed!

    Sergey, well, who is to blame for the fact that the leaders of Aviastar are rams and do not want to develop their brainchild ???
    here you have given an example that the plants are not the ones, this is an excuse for the expression of parasites, you need to work and then there will be success.
    People are spinning and have made obvious progress compared to the same Aviastar.
    And what is worse Aviastar ??? It is necessary to work, and not to shout "fucked up all the polymers"
    1. FID
      +2
      22 January 2013 07: 44
      And you, excuse me, where do you work? Maybe you will open courses on how to work? If you want, I will offer you to the gene. Aviastar directors? But I'm afraid the trick will not work. Poghosyan is on the board of directors of any aircraft plant. A very successful manager. The next time, do not quote the phrase "we need to work", you may be misunderstood.
  15. toguns
    -1
    21 January 2013 17: 48
    I quote Sergei aka SSI
    The total financial debt of Sukhoi Civil Aircraft at the end of 2012 amounted to about $ 1 billion. All this money was taken on credit for the development and implementation of the Sukhoi SuperJet-100 program. However, the SCA alone is still not able to repay this debt to creditors. The Superjet program is still far from self-sufficiency, and the GSS simply does not have its own free funds.

    In such a situation, one of its leading aircraft manufacturing companies decided to lend a helping hand to the state. Namely - to provide a loan exactly for the amount of debt. The decision on this was made by the Government of the Russian Federation on the last working day of the year 2012. According to Decree No. 2619-r, Vnesheconombank will open a credit line in the amount of one billion dollars with a subsequent repayment period of 12 years in favor of the SSS.

    It is noteworthy that neither the SCA nor the Government even tried to hide the real reasons for the state loan, although borrowing to pay overdue debts is already a very negative signal in relation to a particular company. But what to do when the situation simply requires you to do so. Whether any other money will be allocated is not reported. Perhaps, in addition to the debts available today, the SCA does not intend to attract new ones, and is able to further develop solely through its own financing. This would be nice for both the company and the SuperJet-100 project.
    Sergei, he’s the SSI, if you give the facts, then let’s give a more adequate assessment of the airborne crap that deals with the same nonsense as dry, but it does not produce anything, and does not even try.
    the table shows everything; the table itself is a report of the oak for 2011
    1. Avenger711
      0
      21 January 2013 18: 14
      And where did GSS get its money when it just entered the market with its first product? So on-lending is just logical. YES and smear your company from foreign creditors, if any, it makes sense.
      1. toguns
        0
        21 January 2013 18: 29
        Quote: Avenger711
        And where did GSS get its money when it just entered the market with its first product? So on-lending is just logical. YES and smear your company from foreign creditors, if any, it makes sense.

        look at the label carefully the last such column.
        since there are debts of almost all corporations, just keep in mind that debt is different.
        GSS scored debts for promotion and essentially produces something (no matter how they scolded a jet, it flies and there is a series), if we take into account that for 4 years they spun a jet, I would say this is quite good.
        and here under what the debts of the aircraft carrier got an interesting question ???
        ps
        a question for experts and why so many debts from Irkut ???
        it seems that they are producing and they all have norms, have they really scored money in promotion ????
        1. Avenger711
          0
          21 January 2013 18: 47
          Aviakor is what?
          Irkut may have a debt just for production, that is, formally it is large, but if they can close it at once, then it is profitable to have a maximum of money on hand.
          1. toguns
            0
            21 January 2013 19: 26
            Quote: Avenger711
            Aviacor

            if I was mistaken, there should have been an aviastar-sp, and not an air corr.
            Aviastar-sp - made the Tu-204 and was supposed to make Ruslans, but only things are there now.
            Aviakor - makes the An-140, but few and they are not included. their owner is Deribaska.
            1. Avenger711
              0
              21 January 2013 20: 19
              He is doing IL-76MD-90A.
            2. Avenger711
              -1
              22 January 2013 12: 14
              http://warfiles.ru/show-22218-v-ulyanovske-nachinaetsya-proizvodstvo-samoletov-d
              lya-vta.html

              Well, yes, loans for production.
    2. FID
      +2
      22 January 2013 07: 48
      I have not given any assessment. It is estimated that you are probably a specialist. I brought information from the site "Aviation of Russia". You see, when you bring data at the end of 2011, you compare them with the data at the end of 2012. For what purpose?
  16. Avenger711
    0
    21 January 2013 18: 08
    Currently, the Russian military transport aviation includes 22 Ruslans. In this case, they are used very limited. So in 2009, only 4 of them performed flights, mainly engaged in the transportation of government cargo.


    That is, there are a lot of planes, but they do not fly, and the transportation is carried out by Volga-Dnepr. Normal. Here, it seems, the prosecutor's office needs to do a good job first.
  17. +2
    21 January 2013 21: 24
    After some time, production technology, personnel, etc. will be lost. When they understand that this aircraft is nevertheless necessary, they will begin to scratch their turnips, and the resumption of production will already cost much more and will take much longer. Well, they were stepping on this rake, why repeat it again? !!! Or is someone deliberately slowing down the release of these aircraft, bitches? ...
  18. phantom359
    +2
    21 January 2013 22: 41
    I do not understand your VTAshnikov .. That - right, then neither. The old 76th is in demand, but the strategist is not. The man correctly said in front of me - there will be hair on ... to tear, but as if it were not too late. By and large, your military surprise me more and more. One former defense minister is worth what - sheer scandals and debriefing. such are just very worried about the defense of their country. If this disgusting continues, you will rearm for a long time. If someone does not agree, justify. After such articles, it becomes hard on the soul. And the Volga-Dnieper has been using the B747-400f for a long time, so I'm not surprised.
    1. Avenger711
      -1
      22 January 2013 01: 31
      But I, it seems, understand that as soon as money poured into the military-industrial complex, there was an opportunity to cut it, too, and since we only have the people who are there, we don’t have others, they also end up at the posts. Even the new 37th will not completely clean such an audience.
  19. +2
    22 January 2013 01: 47
    According to Rafael Zakirov, director of the Federal State Unitary Aviation Enterprise of EMERCOM of Russia, the ministry signed an agreement to purchase two modernized An-124 Ruslan transport aircraft. Now the delivery dates of domestic cars are being specified.

    According to experts, the average cost of the upgraded version of the An-124 Ruslan is about $ 300 million. After a forced pause in production related to the general situation in the country's economy, the serial construction of transport Ruslan is planned to be resumed at Aviastar-SP. This will happen in 2016, for which about 60 billion rubles are allocated from the federal budget. In order for the production of aircraft to pay off, at least 60 airliners must be produced.
    A search is underway for customers, and the first contracts are being concluded. A solid order portfolio has already reached 15 aircraft. So the largest transport company Volga-Dnepr plans to place orders for 40 aircraft, and another company, also engaged in air transportation, is ready to order 15 An-124 Ruslan. In addition, according to the state arms program of the Russian Federation, designed for the period from 2011 to 2020, provides for the purchase of another 20 An-124 Ruslan aircraft. As you can see, the total number of transport aircraft is already 75 aircraft, which makes their mass production reasonable and commercially viable. Also, according to Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, in addition to the construction of new aircraft, repair will also be carried out of transport vehicles in operation. In total, until 2020, it is planned to repair and modernize 22 An-124 Ruslan.
    In addition to the An-124 Ruslan transport aircraft, the Ministry of Emergency Situations also plans to order four Il-76 aircraft, as well as two Tu-214. In the coming years, one large Mi-26 transport helicopter will be purchased, as well as five Mi-8 and Ka-32. Seven Be-200ES amphibious aircraft are planned by the Ministry for purchase until 2016, and in the current 2012 two An-148 equipped for air headquarters will be purchased. These same aircraft can be converted into medical-evacuation service aircraft as soon as possible.
    Currently, the fleet of the Ministry of Emergencies of the Russian Federation has a fleet of the following aircraft:
    - six Be-200;
    - six IL-76;
    - two An-74;
    - two Yak-42;
    - two IL-62. http://politikus.ru/industry/1025-mchs-rossii-naraschivaet-aviapark.html • Author: Passionar • 16-04-2012,
  20. +2
    22 January 2013 20: 46
    Minister of Defense changed like, but a direct betrayal continues .....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"