Spetsstroy reports: There are no problems with the construction of the Eastern Cosmodrome

24
Grigory Naginsky, Director of the Federal Agency for Special Construction, told a press conference on Friday in Izhevsk about the situation with the construction of the Vostochny cosmodrome. "I think that there are no problems with the spaceport. The only thing is that our construction capabilities are ahead of the capabilities of the designers. We could work faster if they would issue design documentation more quickly," he said.

Spetsstroy reports: There are no problems with the construction of the Eastern Cosmodrome


According to Naginsky, this year Spetsstroy should provide infrastructure things related to railways and highways. “Everything is going well, everything is in the schedule,” he specified. In addition, this year they plan to put into operation the first phase of the Spetsstroy construction industry base and the building of the space center administration for Roscosmos. "

Work is already underway on the two main objects of the cosmodrome - on the launch and assembly and test facilities. "Today, at the launch complex, the foundation has been completely poured. Now, all sorts of foundations are pouring around it and in the near future drawings from the institute should come out, we will order metal constructions, we must make them this year and start assembling the starting complex itself," Naginsky said. At the assembly and test facility - the launch pad - the foundation has already been completed, the foundations of the adjacent objects are being made.

According to the director Spetsstroy, there are no difficulties with financing either. "Financing is very good there. If we argue from the point of view of us as builders, then it is very comfortable to work with the federal budget: sign a contract, get your own money from 30 to 80% of advance payment, work on time, with good quality and then there are no problems at all. It is interesting to work with the budget ", - he stressed.

The Baikonur complex is a city of the same name and a cosmodrome and is rented by Russia from Kazakhstan, according to a bilateral agreement, until 2050. The operation of the cosmodrome costs Russia about five billion rubles a year. Thus, Baikonur is considered an administrative-territorial unit of Kazakhstan, operating under a lease.

This year, construction began on the Vostochny cosmodrome in the Amur Region. In this regard, it is possible that after 2050, Russia itself will leave Baikonur. According to other data, the refusal of Russia from the lease of the cosmodrome can already occur much earlier - after nine years.

Currently, more than 70 thousand people live in the city, of which 37% are citizens of Russia, about 60% are citizens of Kazakhstan. In addition, about four thousand Russians sent to provide start-ups are almost always at Baikonur. More than 1 billion rubles is transferred annually from the federal budget of Russia to the budget of the city of Baikonur, writes NEWSru.com.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    21 January 2013 08: 42
    Spetsstroy reports: There are no problems with the construction of the Eastern Cosmodrome

    Very good!
    1. 0
      21 January 2013 10: 45
      It seems to me that we will use Baikonur for a long time ...
  2. +8
    21 January 2013 08: 42
    The political leadership of Russia is doing the right thing by building cosmodromes on its territory, thereby insuring itself against future undesirable situations such as renting and using an object on the territory of another state.
  3. +3
    21 January 2013 08: 45
    Hurry, they would have built a spaceport, or else with relatives like our neighbors where Baikonur is located, they themselves are not so hot! The East Cosmadrome will give us independence, which is very important in our time after the collapse of the union!
    1. 0
      21 January 2013 09: 18
      This is not me saying, this is Wikipedia saying:
      Disadvantages of the Vostochny Cosmodrome in comparison with Baikonur:The need to build your own aerodrome for the cosmodrome (while there are two modern aerodromes on Baikonur) or to lay a railway line from the cosmodrome to the nearest aerodrome (for transporting spacecraft).
      Increase in transportation costs (both financial and time). Now the main space enterprises are located in Moscow, Samara, Zheleznogorsk (Krasnoyarsk Territory), from there spacecraft, launch vehicles and personnel are delivered to Baikonur by rail and air at a distance of 2500 and 1500 km, respectively. In the case of the creation of the Vostochny Cosmodrome, the delivery distance will exceed 5500 km.
      The cosmodrome will be located at 6 degrees north than Baikonur, which will lead to a decrease in the maximum mass of cargo launched into space (ceteris paribus).
      Spent rocket parts falling into the taiga can cause forest fires, which are already a serious problem for this region.
      Lack of housing and infrastructure for employees. The number of required staff, together with families, can reach 100 000 people. In Uglegorsk itself, no more than 5 000 people live, which makes it necessary to actually build a new city, comparable in number with residential buildings and the size of the infrastructure to the regional center (Blagoveshchensk).
      1. +3
        21 January 2013 09: 43
        Quote: Karavan

        This is not me saying, this is Wikipedia saying:
        Disadvantages of the Vostochny Cosmodrome as compared to Baikonur: The need to build an own aerodrome for the cosmodrome (while there are two modern aerodromes on Baikonur) or to lay a railway line from the cosmodrome to the nearest aerodrome (for transporting spacecraft).
        Increase in transportation costs (both financial and time). Now the main space enterprises are located in Moscow, Samara, Zheleznogorsk (Krasnoyarsk Territory), from there spacecraft, launch vehicles and personnel are delivered to Baikonur by rail and air at a distance of 2500 and 1500 km, respectively. In the case of the creation of the Vostochny Cosmodrome, the delivery distance will exceed 5500 km.
        The cosmodrome will be located at 6 degrees north than Baikonur, which will lead to a decrease in the maximum mass of cargo launched into space (ceteris paribus).
        Spent rocket parts falling into the taiga can cause forest fires, which are already a serious problem for this region.
        Lack of housing and infrastructure for employees. The number of required staff, together with families, can reach 100 000 people. In Uglegorsk itself, no more than 5 000 people live, which makes it necessary to actually build a new city, comparable in number with residential buildings and the size of the infrastructure to the regional center (Blagoveshchensk).

        Well, Wikipedia as always kipish leads! There are problems that naturally they will be solved. Everyone understands that it will not be easy, but they must do it! And as you like, independence is simply not given!
        1. rolik
          +1
          21 January 2013 10: 22
          Quote: tronin.maxim
          independence is not just given!

          I remember here, recently, the Kazakh brothers said that their government allocated a lot of money in the amount of 200 million. And now it turns out that we are investing 5 billion rubles, even if translated into dollars, it turns out a bit too much. That is, it turns out that Russia completely contains everything. And myself and "that guy".
      2. Jin
        +4
        21 January 2013 11: 48
        Quote: Karavan
        it’s not me who says it, Wikipedia says:


        Yes, there are undoubtedly disadvantages, but the construction of a new cosmodrome is the development of infrastructure in the east of our country, and this is a huge plus, whatever one may say! Moscow bureaucrats will pay more attention to that region, and the east of Russia is of great strategic importance for the country. "Vostochny" - YES! Besides, it is not necessary to abandon Baikonur at all. But the rental price, you can easily knock it down)
      3. Aktino
        +1
        21 January 2013 12: 25
        Well, yes, and there on Wikipedia where the minuses are listed, the pluses are listed, but we modestly keep silent about them, right? smile

        Pluses:
        - the initial section of the flight path of the launch vehicle does not pass over densely populated regions of Russia and over the territories of foreign states;
        - The location of the cosmodrome is located near developed railways and highways and airfields.

        It is worth noting a decrease in political risks - in recent years, Kazakhstan has blocked several times the launches of Russian missiles under various pretexts.

        The primary task of the new complex is to reduce the load on the Baikonur cosmodrome, but not completely replace it, at least until the end of the lease term - 2050.

        Local authorities are trying to solve regional problems in the Far Eastern Federal District by creating a spaceport. In the report of the Chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Institute of Demography, Migration and Regional Development, Yuri Krupnov, the Vostochny Cosmodrome is considered as the cornerstone for the implementation of the State Program for the Relocation of Compatriots

        The construction of this cosmodrome is the development of the infrastructure of the Far East, independence of launches, inappropriately paying rent for someone else’s pocket and much more
    2. +3
      21 January 2013 09: 35
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      .... Rather, they would build a spaceport, otherwise it’s not so hot with relatives like our neighbors where Baikonur is located! The East Cosmadrome will give us independence, which is very important in our time after the collapse of the union! ....

      Anyway, the importance of Baikonur as a - Symbol - is very important ...
      True, with the appearance of a new cosmadrome in Russia, the effectiveness of "blackmail" will sharply decrease, and perhaps it will simply become impossible.
      1. +3
        21 January 2013 09: 39
        Quote: Bulls.
        the effectiveness of "blackmail" will sharply decrease, and perhaps it will simply become impossible.

        That's what I'm talking about! Let a lot of money be spent but it's worth it! You can’t save on independence!
  4. itr
    +2
    21 January 2013 08: 50
    We could work faster if they issued project documentation faster, "he said..
    Let the construction permit be given without a star, after passing the finished project of the examination, judging by the object, the examination has been going on for several years
    It’s interesting to work with the budget just for that phrase it's time to send a check
    1. rolik
      0
      21 January 2013 10: 24
      Quote: itr
      t building permit is given after passing the finished project examination
      . Usually, an expert assessment takes from one to two months (if all approvals are completed). So, it is quite possible that the work is ahead of schedule.
      1. itr
        0
        21 January 2013 14: 08
        90 days last year I handed over to gas stations issued after 100
        and I’m writing again that they will not be allowed to build until there is a POSITIVE examination of the project (this is by law)
  5. 0
    21 January 2013 08: 52
    Check to see what was built there and for what money.
    And then "I am tormented by vague doubts" that a couple of billions have not been stolen there!
  6. 0
    21 January 2013 09: 05
    How many times is this location of the cosmodrome less efficient in comparison with the "theoretical possibility" of location at the equator?
    1. FID
      +2
      21 January 2013 10: 30
      The north the cosmodrome is located, the lower the linear velocity that helps the rocket. Linear speed is proportional to the radius of the Earth. Something like that, I think.
    2. mamba
      +1
      21 January 2013 10: 51
      Quote: dmitreach
      How many times is this location of the cosmodrome less efficient in comparison with the "theoretical possibility" of location at the equator?

      The equatorial spaceport, for example, Kourou in French Guiana, allows you to put heavier loads into normal orbit. The same rocket can launch into space 15% more cargo compared to launches from the American cosmodrome at Cape Canaveral and 40% compared to launches from the Baikonur Cosmodrome. The advantage is due to the fact that at the equator the rotation of the Earth provides the greatest increase in speed (almost 500 m / s) for a rocket launching in the east direction - according to the rotation of the planet. In addition, significantly less fuel is consumed to launch into geostationary orbits.
      For launches from Kuru, the carrier rocket had to be modified. The new version of Soyuz-ST is a variant of the Soyuz-2 three-stage launch vehicle with the Fregat upper stage, adapted to the conditions of increased heat and humidity. This is the so-called "tropical performance".
      On the other hand, a spaceport located closer to the pole, for example, Plesetsk (62,7 degrees north latitude), is preferred for launching cargoes into polar orbit.
      Since Vostochny, aka Svobodny (51,5 deg. N) is located north of Baikonur (45,6 deg. N), launches from it will be less effective. But this is better than being left without a cosmodrome at all.
      "Baikonur" allows to launch satellites into orbits with inclination - from 50 to 99 degrees, "Vostochny" - from 51 to 110 degrees, equatorial cosmodromes provide the ability to launch into high circular, elliptical (without orbital inclination restrictions), geostationary orbits and departure trajectories.
  7. +4
    21 January 2013 09: 22
    .... There are no problems with the construction of the Vostochny cosmodrome ...

    After the "strange" gestures of Kazakhstan towards Baikonur, this news is very useful.
  8. 0
    21 January 2013 09: 49
    All the gestures of our eastern neighbor must be fought off in a timely manner, Baikonur cannot be surrendered, it must be used and the influence in the neighbor’s country will be strengthened many times over
    1. mamba
      +3
      21 January 2013 10: 11
      While Nazarbayev is in power in Kazakhstan, the rent for Baikonur, although high, is still acceptable for Russia. But judging by the statements of some Kazakh politicians, this will not last long. Either the fate of the Gabala radar station awaits Baikonur, or, even worse, Port Arthur. Therefore, Russia is trying to anticipate events, regardless of the geographical and infrastructural problems that arise during the construction of the Vostochny cosmodrome.
      1. rolik
        +2
        21 January 2013 10: 26
        Quote: mamba
        with those geographic and infrastructural problems

        There are no geographical problems, there are only infrastructure problems (the main drawback, as they say, is the lack of an airdrome), so they are just being solved. Remember how Baikonur began, the bare steppe and tents in it.
      2. 0
        21 January 2013 12: 50
        Yes, you should expect only an increase in rental fees, plus other troubles that you can think of. It is necessary to defer all this. After the construction of the new East, Baikanur will gradually cease to invest completely and take everything in the end, Kazakhstan itself will not even pull to maintain the entire infrastructure in proper condition. And in principle, he didn’t give up to other countries. If only China for a while
  9. sergskak
    +1
    21 January 2013 10: 18
    Finish already so that you could send Baikonur and everything local there.
    The only thing is that our construction capabilities are ahead of the capabilities of designers.
    Hey, designers, no matter how fast you can’t work? People are waiting! For the lifts and go! fellow
    1. +2
      21 January 2013 11: 12
      Stand by yourself at the kulman! XNUMXst century, all the same! fellow
      1. sergskak
        +2
        21 January 2013 11: 43
        engineer74Yes, I'm joking. I’m still living in the XXth.
        1. +1
          21 January 2013 12: 17
          I want to see you in the XX century! laughing
  10. avt
    0
    21 January 2013 10: 32
    Well, even so! good But anyway, it’s upsetting to tears for being lost. Whoever was in Tyuratam during the USSR will understand!
  11. Alexander-Tomsk
    +1
    21 January 2013 11: 01
    It is necessary to build its own, but Baikonur should not be left. We will leave, someone will come, nature does not tolerate emptiness wink Those Chinese, I think, will be not opposed. So either stay using both spaceports, or leaving making rocket launch from Baikonur impossible feel Crash what thread you understand ...
  12. Nechai
    0
    21 January 2013 12: 09
    Quote: Alexander-Tomsk
    Those Chinese, I think, will be not opposed.

    They have their own. And much to the south of Baikonur. But with Vostochny it is much more convenient to cooperate in space with the PRC, at least to do byaki ... The presence of Vostochny will reduce the risks and tensions around Baikonur. After all, such an option is possible that international programs will remain on Tyuratam, and our national space program will be implemented in Svobodny. That is to say, without intersecting, without creating inconvenience to each other.
  13. biglow
    0
    21 January 2013 14: 34
    Extra space center will never hurt and the Far East must also be mastered
  14. webdog
    0
    21 January 2013 16: 13
    Quote: Apollon
    The political leadership of Russia is doing the right thing building cosmodromes on its territory

    the political leadership generally does everything right ...
    I think so.
  15. 0
    21 January 2013 21: 45
    the situation with the Baikonur complex is somewhat reminiscent of the situation with the gas pipe in Ukraine - there was gas a pipe was needed - there was blackmail and pluses more than enough, but they strained themselves, built a bypass route and "voila" there were no problems and the economy was raised and there was no one else depend on_Vostochny_BE
  16. 0
    21 January 2013 23: 23
    If Russia leaves Baikonur, it is unlikely that the Kazakhs will be able to count on China.
    The Chinese will glance, glance they will steal everything that can be copied and good bye.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"