After establishing the location of the HIMARS MLRS of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, it was struck by the Russian Armed Forces

54
After establishing the location of the HIMARS MLRS of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, it was struck by the Russian Armed Forces

Another example of the effective operation of unmanned aerial vehicles of the Russian Armed Forces took place in one of the directions in the zone of a special military operation.

As you know, Russian troops regularly and carefully monitor and control the movements of weapons, military equipment, and enemy personnel. For this purpose, unmanned aerial vehicles at the disposal of our units are used.



Footage of Russian artillery working at the location of the enemy M142 HIMARS multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) has appeared on the Internet. First of all, using drone visual control was established over the launches of the Ukrainian MLRS.




Having fired three missiles, the rocket system drove into a forest belt, hoping to hide its location from Russian troops and avoid the consequences of counter-battery warfare. However drone The Russian Armed Forces managed to determine the location of the HIMARS MLRS, after which this area was hit by artillery fire from Russian troops.


Thanks to the effective work of our drones and artillery, Ukrainian formations regularly suffer significant losses not only in personnel, but also in military equipment, including those transferred by Western countries to the Ukrainian army. By the way, a number of Western analysts consider the high losses of Western military equipment to be one of the main reasons for the ongoing reduction in US military assistance to Ukraine.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    54 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      9 December 2023 12: 30
      It’s very good that we managed to find and destroy it, it’s a pity that we couldn’t destroy it before the missiles were launched, let’s hope that the Americans will transfer fewer and fewer installations and missiles to them, after all, this is not a cheap thing.
      1. +6
        9 December 2023 12: 34
        A rare case, unfortunately. It’s a mobile system, that’s why it’s mobile.
      2. +9
        9 December 2023 12: 34
        Where is it written - destroyed?.......
        1. -1
          9 December 2023 12: 38
          As I understand it, it was still possible to destroy it, since the response was the arrival of artillery. This is certainly a difficult target, but still not invulnerable.
          1. +4
            9 December 2023 12: 42
            I didn’t even see the explosion, as this usually happens when equipment is destroyed, and you?
            1. +3
              9 December 2023 12: 46
              If he shot off the ammunition, then what should explode is the tank with diesel fuel, these are colorful and powerful car explosions in Hollywood films, in life everything does not look so spectacular.
              1. -3
                9 December 2023 12: 49
                All clear..............
                1. -1
                  9 December 2023 19: 34
                  If the place where the vehicle was hidden was spotted, then they probably did not spare shells to destroy it and stopped only after confirmation of the destruction of this vehicle - it was too big a target, it would cause a lot of trouble.
                  1. +3
                    9 December 2023 21: 10
                    Example: yesterday an article about a gathering of dill, filming from a UAV from afar, residential development, airstrike - 2 explosions, the result is this and clarification: by means of objective control, a couple of dozen were killed and wounded and a couple of carts were destroyed, there is not even a hint of a hit nearby, but hats are thrown they are already singing for the repose of the dead, and some are repainting it in yellow vomit and being daring, one almost reached his parents
            2. +12
              9 December 2023 12: 48
              It might not have exploded if it had shot everything off. But I agree, defeat is not visible
              1. +1
                10 December 2023 10: 53
                Sergey, hi but I really want to..
            3. +2
              9 December 2023 13: 29
              Quote: While I'm sick
              I didn’t even see the explosion, as this usually happens when equipment is destroyed, and you?

              Equipment that is transferred to the destroyed category does not always explode at the moment of transition. Cut by shrapnel. How many Oshkoshs were classified as destroyed without explosion or dust. Even the destroyed Leopards did not all burn strongly, let alone explode. And not every Bandera member explodes. when it is destroyed. So keep cheering for the blue and yellow Nazis.
              1. -1
                9 December 2023 14: 02
                Oh how you were bombed. I’m not from that family to “cheer” for those you wrote. Even in the article there are no words about at least the defeat of the car. Maybe it drove about a meter underground. So I’ll write: Uncle you fool ?
                1. 0
                  9 December 2023 15: 59
                  Quote: While I'm sick
                  : Are you uncle?

                  Oh, don’t, auntie, you’re drinking purgen in vain...
                  Quote: While I'm sick
                  I'm not from that family
                  I don’t know, I didn’t control...
                  Quote: While I'm sick
                  there is no word in the article about at least the destruction of the car

                  Then why did you write in the previous comment?
                  Quote: While I'm sick
                  I didn’t even see an explosion, as usually happens when equipment is destroyed,
                  Or are you like Dolly the fish, 25 seconds and update?
                  1. -2
                    9 December 2023 17: 03
                    Whoops, whoever calls you names is called that, you know, yes, and he’s also trying to get into the family. Apparently there’s nothing to answer on the merits, so that’s what he’s got, he ate shit?
                  2. -5
                    9 December 2023 17: 03
                    Whoops, whoever calls you names is called that, you know, yes, and he’s also trying to get into the family. Apparently there’s nothing to answer on the merits, so that’s it, ..... he ate it?
              2. -4
                9 December 2023 17: 10
                Open your eyes: after which this area was hit by fire. If you got into the discussion, then first read the article or give reasons in favor of your dumping, or is everything that you don’t think is repainted yellow-vomit? Then you need to see a doctor and I think a Russian doctor won’t help you here.
            4. +1
              9 December 2023 14: 09
              "Do you see the gopher?
              - No.
              - I don't see it either. And he is."
            5. -3
              9 December 2023 22: 21
              Run and take a look if you don’t trust it, and at the same time show us a photo report - they destroyed it, or just wounded it. At the same time, improve your health.
            6. -1
              15 December 2023 10: 34
              Even one large fragment may be enough to disable the missile defense system. And for this installation, even loss of mobility is a death sentence. A little later they will simply burn FPV with drones.
              1. 0
                15 December 2023 11: 42
                Open your eyes and think with your own head: how many Chimera shells have already been shot down after this alleged MLRS defeat
          2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +5
        9 December 2023 22: 04
        Why did you decide that you managed to destroy it? We managed to deliver a fire strike in the area where the Khaymars MLRS was located, without clear confirmation of its destruction!
        I really hope that we managed to destroy everything, or at least put it out of action! And most importantly, we have experience in tracking down such MLRS
        1. 0
          15 December 2023 11: 47
          Got experience laughing , what are you carrying? If it were an Experience, it would fly less, but it is intercepted almost every day and falls in Donetsk
      4. +2
        10 December 2023 18: 51
        The only question is, was it destroyed?
        Hope so.
        We should grab one of these.
      5. +1
        11 December 2023 08: 40
        People like you should be fined a large amount for misinformation. Where is the destruction of Himars in the video?! How did you see this? Even VO writes laconically that he was hit. To strike does not mean to hit, much less destroy. The good thing here is that they were able to at least detect a salvo from Khimars from a UAV, follow the installation and manage to shoot in its direction with whatever they could reach.
    2. +13
      9 December 2023 12: 34
      How Khaimars shot was seen in this video.
      We saw him leaving after the shooting.
      We saw how they shot at the places where he was driving.
      Destruction is not visible.
      1. +7
        9 December 2023 12: 42
        Destruction is not visible.
        I agree, the article also says that
        this area was hit by artillery fire from Russian troops
        not a word about destruction. Of course, I wanted it to be destroyed or at least damaged.
        1. +6
          9 December 2023 15: 34
          Quote: rotmistr60
          this area was hit by artillery fire from Russian troops
          not a word about destruction.

          It was necessary to grab this area with your teeth and thresh until this rocket launcher surfaced with its wheels upside down! This is exactly what the Yankees would do!!! I am 155% sure of this...
          And our boobies of the king of heaven “fired at the area where the target was located.” At the same time, I counted about 5 ruptures... and two smokes, white (!) as when wood burns, and not BLACK, when fuel or rubber with wires in insulation burns.
          This is how it turns out that “a fire defeat was inflicted.” The only question is: - to whom is it inflicted? -- PLOT!!!
          And NAYMARS, the enemy, again left “slightly frightened.” Well, I'll be more careful in future. But there was a real chance to send it for scrap! But apparently it’s not fate... Instead of “destruction” we have a verbal balancing act with “defeat”. The navy is even more honest than the infantry. Our targets are divided into “fired and shot down”... and there is no trick – “defeated”. But, damn it, they don’t even name the extent of this “defeat”! Damn, how cleverly they did it...thick-faced ones!!! It's time to get them all into the trenches, for re-education!!! am
          1. -6
            9 December 2023 16: 08
            “The navy is even more honest than the infantry.” Controversial thesis. Remind me how in the Baltic Fleet in 2016 the commander, the NS and a number of other “sea wolves” were simultaneously fired?
            As for 155%, wait until March 17th. Not long left.
          2. -2
            9 December 2023 17: 12
            Wow, I like adequate reasoning from Boa Constrictor
          3. +5
            9 December 2023 18: 26
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            And NAYMARS, the enemy, again left “slightly frightened.”

            To prevent the Khaimars from leaving, the reconnaissance UAV must be equipped with a laser target designator, and in this case our artillery must fire the Krasnopol - according to the target designation of the UAV. And so this is all self-indulgence and playing catch-up
            1. -1
              9 December 2023 21: 29
              Orlan10 was said to be able to do laser control, where it is, who knows?
              1. +1
                9 December 2023 22: 59
                Quote: While I'm sick
                Orlan10 was said to be able to use the laser center

                Maybe he can, but there would be more current from a larger device, such as the “Forpost”, so that it would be guaranteed to pull and have good optics.
                But the point is not even in the presence of such target-designating UAVs and high-precision projectiles, but in the issue of creating operational and tactical command and control systems based on them.
          4. +2
            11 December 2023 08: 45
            Here is an excellent example of how Kanoshenkov daily inflicts dozens of fire defeats in his reports on the zombie fighter. It turns out exactly like this. Hence the dozens of destroyed Khimars in the reports of the Ministry of Defense.
        2. -2
          9 December 2023 17: 22
          And the very first cap-thrower buried her, and if there is a reinforced concrete bunker there, ten meters deep, that only a penetrating KAB 1500 can be opened, if she does not change her location after the miss-arrivals
      2. -7
        9 December 2023 12: 49
        Do “their” people plus you? lol
      3. +1
        9 December 2023 22: 25
        Just like the terrorists from Israel, it is necessary to say that several thousand rebels from Hamas were killed, while only videos of explosions of hospitals, mosques and dead Arab children and women.
      4. +2
        10 December 2023 07: 48
        Actually, no one saw the destroyed Khaymars. Should we think that there are no losses at all in this type of equipment?
    3. -2
      9 December 2023 12: 41
      Quote: While I'm sick
      MLRS HIMARS


      Yes, it’s written somewhere. Type HIMARS MLRS into the search - there are probably a hundred articles about it already. They just repeat articles - hit on, video on hit, etc.
    4. -3
      9 December 2023 12: 43
      Quote: While I'm sick
      I didn’t even see the explosion, as this usually happens when equipment is destroyed, and you?



      And I didn’t see it - my computer doesn’t show the video.
    5. -8
      9 December 2023 12: 47
      Anyway, some idiot put a minus for the demand for pro-destruction. Chump - meaning: stupid person
    6. -6
      9 December 2023 12: 50
      Quote: While I'm sick
      Anyway, some idiot put a minus for the demand for pro-destruction. Chump - meaning: stupid person


      )00 - yes, it’s like a toy for children - if there is something, then you have to press it).
    7. +6
      9 December 2023 12: 59
      Or you can show destroyed installations. Strike and destroy are not the same thing
    8. +2
      9 December 2023 13: 57
      Well, they popped “in that direction”...and-and-and? Where is the destruction? That's the point of posting all this, it works to a disadvantage - do they really consider readers to be imbeciles?
    9. +1
      9 December 2023 13: 58
      Granted, there's no video evidence of the damage anywhere, so they could have just damaged his wheels, punctured the tire, fixed it in an hour, and he was on his way.
    10. +1
      9 December 2023 14: 18
      Big request. Provide at least one link to a photo or video of the destroyed HIMARS.
      1. 0
        9 December 2023 21: 31
        There are some like this on Tyrnet, look
    11. Uno
      -1
      9 December 2023 15: 17
      Operational news, the video is almost a year old, but that’s it)
    12. +2
      9 December 2023 16: 52
      Complete bullshit. Reconnaissance drone in the air. He sees the car. And then the camera moves away from the subject. So where is the benefit of this reconnaissance drone? Shells in "milk"...
    13. +1
      9 December 2023 17: 53
      If they were “tracking and controlling”, they wouldn’t wait for the launch, but would bang on the route to the shooting site
    14. +1
      9 December 2023 22: 55
      Fantasies and nothing more. And the drone is somewhere off to the side. In short, everything is like ... "amazed" and that's it.
    15. +1
      10 December 2023 16: 13
      You can also see there that it is a cut from frames. It is possible that they showed just pieces of what was recorded. Once they tracked it, they probably determined the consequences of the shelling.
    16. +1
      11 December 2023 09: 32
      Equipment can be considered destroyed only after a reliable photo of the wreckage, or at least a video of its destruction.
      Videos in the style of “she drove into that little forest and we fired at it” are NOT evidence of destruction.
      Low.
    17. 0
      12 December 2023 14: 26
      a clear example of how we generate reports of enemy losses from the Ministry of Defense. It’s such a pity that they didn’t take advantage of this excellent chance and destroy the Khimars installation. You couldn’t spare a lancet for it, or a tornado-S rocket or Krasnopol. The installation was standing, the coordinates were known. It was possible to cover it 100%. And so they mediocrely fired four 152 mm shells and reported victoriously.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"