So, the United States got into a very uncomfortable situation - their looseners, the “rebels,” committed a horrendous attack at the University of Aleppo, killing about a hundred people. They understood that elementary diplomacy required condemning this barbarism. But how to punish your favorite child? And the US State Department with the help of obedient, controlled media found a way out that was incredible in its cynicism. The Syrian state itself was accused of organizing a terrible terrorist act. Victoria Nuland fakely portrayed grief and anger, changing the places of a criminal and a victim, terrorists and those who fight them. However, students in Aleppo know who made this monstrous crime. They know that a few days before the terrorist attack, the so-called “opposition” threatened students, demanding that they boycott their studies at the university. However, young people wanted to continue their studies, and not to run with machine guns, shouting pseudo-revolutionary slogans. For this they paid. The Faculty of Architecture was particularly hard hit - he immediately lost 20 people. The terrorists and their bosses know how necessary these specialists in the country can become - after all, after their destructive actions, too much needs to be restored now - and houses, schools, hospitals, and ancient monuments ...
And the cynical Madame Victoria Nuland still has enough audacity to turn the tongue and accuse the Syrian state of allegedly killing its own future specialists?
The Russian Foreign Ministry expressed deep condolences to the relatives of the victims and said: “We condemn in the most decisive way the next massacre of innocent people in Syria. We believe that an equally uncompromising position regarding terrorism is claimed by the entire international community. There is no excuse for such actions.
We especially note that this attack of terrorists took place in a situation where normal life gradually began to recover in most areas of Aleppo. There is - a ruthless bloody provocation, the revenge of terrorists for the significant losses they suffered in the confrontation with the government forces. "
Finally, in the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation the accents are correctly placed and terrorism is directly called terrorism. It is a pity that in order for the terrorists to be called by their real name, and not by the “opposition”, such a bloody sacrifice was required.
At a time when the US State Department attempted to blame the incident on Syria itself, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was in Dushanbe on an official visit. He strongly condemned the statements of the US Department of State and said that it was difficult to imagine even greater blasphemy.
The next step should be the condemnation of the attack by the UN Security Council. The Syrian MFA sent a corresponding message to the UN Security Council and the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.
The latter fairly regularly condemned the terrorist attack and even called it a war crime, which, in general, is true. The problem is, what conclusions should be expected from the UN Secretary General, who shortly before the terrorist attack in Aleppo, on January 12, speaking in one of the New York synagogues, said: "60 thousands of people died in the conflict, rooted in the peaceful demands of the people to give it more of freedom. There will be no amnesty for the guilty. "
Instead of seeing where the legs of terrorism grow from, Ban Ki-moon justified the so-called “opposition”, saying that she only wanted “more freedom”. Now that everyone in Syria has already “eaten enough” of this false “freedom”, the UN Secretary General wants to bring even more “freedom” on the wings of NATO planes to Syria, stating: “States should protect citizens from ethnic cleansing and mass murder, but that’s what does not occur in the Middle East. " How does he propose to protect citizens from massacres if he accuses the wrong side in advance? If he justifies those who arranged all this in advance, they say, poor fellows, just “wanted more freedom” and prefer not to see who the conflict is rooted in the wrong place, that it is kindled from the outside?
Will a terrible terrorist act in Aleppo Ban Ki-Moon reconsider its mistaken position, will it arouse conscience in it?
Something of conscience in the West is not enough, and at the initiative of Switzerland, around 60 countries sent another request to the UN - to bring the Syrian leadership to the so-called “International Criminal Court”. Not for the first time, these Euro-people happen to threaten the recalcitrant leaders with the Hague Judgment. If a leader cannot be put on his knees, they begin to prepare a chamber in a northern European gloomy city. But for some reason they are not in a hurry to bring to justice a terrorist pseudo-opposition, killing, robbing, creating pogroms, forcing people to become refugees.
And while students of all universities in Syria light candles in memory of fallen comrades, when in the world, including in Moscow, actions of their memory take place and caring people carry flowers to the buildings of the Syrian embassies, when the Foreign Ministry of Iran, Lebanon, Venezuela , Brazil and other countries express their condolences to the SAR, while the Syrian President orders to restore everything that was destroyed as soon as possible - a fierce information war against Syria is accompanied by new terrorist attacks.
The very next day, January 16, in the town of Idleb, near the Turkish border, another bloody and brutal crime was committed. A suicide bomber blew up a mined car in the street. 22 man died, more than 30 injured.
It should be mentioned that two days before this terrorist attack, a major anti-terrorist demonstration took place in Idleb. People took to the street with the national flags of Syria and anti-terrorism slogans. In conditions of Idleb, this is a real heroism - as there are quite a lot of militants leaking from the Turkish border in the vicinity of the city. In addition, the terrorists believed that they had great support in Idleba. But the citizens of the city, like the residents of Aleppo, also spoke out against the terrorist activities that had bothered them and undermined the foundations of their peaceful life. That gangsters and committed an act of retribution to drown out the voice of the people.
The Syrian Foreign Ministry also sent information about the attack to the UN Security Council and the UN Secretary General. But, if even about the terrible act of terrorism in Aleppo, where so many people died, some countries - members of the Security Council start to shamelessly play on, what to expect from them about another crime? For them, it is more crime, less crime ...
In parallel with the terrorist war, slander against the Syrian army and Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad continues. With the filing of the Saudi newspaper Al-Watan, the following misinformation began to “walk” in the media - as if President Al-Asad had received information from his generals that an attempt was possible on his life using high-precision missiles, and gave the order in the event of his death to bomb Israel (oh, the favorite topic of disinformers!). And he himself, allegedly, moved onto a Russian ship in the Mediterranean Sea and leaves it with the help of a personal helicopter only in extreme cases. And he himself is preparing, if the situation worsens, to sail on this ship to Russia.
It’s hard to think more than that, because everyone knows that Damascus is far from the Mediterranean Sea, and even a boat, not to mention a ship, doesn’t sail along the river that flows through the city. The ports of the Mediterranean, where Russian or Syrian ships can stand, are located almost 300 kilometers from the Syrian capital. And to fly this distance, overcoming half of Syria, in conditions when the rebels have MANPADS? Truly, the Saudis and those who hastened to pick up their misinformation, a rich imagination.
And most importantly, the President never thought of leaving his Fatherland. Last November, he said very clearly and unequivocally that he was born in Syria and will die in his homeland. Only the masters will not understand this, and that’s what they fantasize about.
And the president appeared on TV screens, in his own office in Damascus, in the very one where he had hospitably met many Syrians and foreign politicians long before the anti-Syrian conspiracy. This time he took the oath of office from the newly appointed governors of the provinces of Deir ez-Zor and Idleb. This fact completely refuted the monstrous lies spread by the media, which for some reason, unlike the truth, rapidly spread around the world ...
This is not the only lie that so rapidly ran through the world media. In one of the previous articles I had to write that some Arab media spread “information” that the state of health of the UAR Minister of Internal Affairs Muhammad Al-Shaar, who was wounded during the terrorist attack in the building of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, worsened greatly, which was not true. The media went on and hurried to report his death. However, the same day the minister appeared on the screens of Syrian TV. His hand was bandaged, but he invoked Syrians to help the Army and Armed Forces in a cheerful voice and said that restoring stability in the country and the political process is impossible without combating terrorism, which has no religion or moral, but is aimed against the whole country.
Even such a joyous event as the liberation of Iranian pilgrims by 48, who were captured six months ago by the bandits, and that was not without misinformation - rumors appeared that Syria had exchanged them for more than 2 thousands of militants! The Ministry of Information of the SAR categorically refuted these speculations and reported that Syria does not make such compromises with terrorists, this is contrary to the principles of the state. The hostages were freed by the efforts of the valiant Syrian Arab army.
Information war against Syria manifested itself even in such an episode as the creation of a computer game on this topic. This game was created in Britain, and you can play it only on one side. Do I have to say which one? Of course, on the one that commits acts of terrorism, but at the same time they make “innocent freedom fighters” out of it. Only here the reality is not a computer game, and terrorism will be crushed.