Converting Flying Transformers

35
Today, many have seen on television or on the Internet stories about such an interesting aircraft, like a convertiplane, someone read about them in magazines. What are these interesting cars? Convertible planes are aircraft that are able to perform vertical take-off and landing (like ordinary helicopters), but at the same time able to carry out a long horizontal high-speed flight, which is typical for aircraft. Since such aircraft are not fully aircraft or helicopters, this affects their appearance. In addition, the fact that these aircraft are characterized by differing flight regimes, during their creation and design, it is often necessary to make compromises.

It is worth noting that dreams of building such an aircraft that would be able to make a vertical take-off and landing, simultaneously with high-speed horizontal flight, have equally long-standing historylike dreams of flying in general. The first projects of something similar offered at the time even Leonardo da Vinci. The very idea of ​​“crossing” a fairly fast, but limited to the flight regimes and home conditions, and a much less speedy, but unpretentious helicopter at the take-off and landing sites, occupied the minds of designers and the military for many years. However, any significant development of such devices could be achieved only recently.

Work on convertiplanes - aircraft, which due to the rotation of propellers could be converted from a helicopter to an airplane and vice versa, was carried out in many countries of the world. Designers of almost all states with developed aviation industry, worked on such machines for more than half a century. The first works in this area can be attributed to the 1920-1930th years of the last century. They worked on the creation of a convertiplane in pre-war Europe, during the war they worked on a project of such machines in Germany. In the 1970s, work was carried out in the Mil Design Bureau on the project of the Mi-30 convertiplane, which did not fly up into the sky. As a result, certain successes in their creation were achieved only in the USA. The only Bell V-22 Osprey tiltrotor currently in serial production is in service with the US Marine Corps. Its development by Boeing and Bell took more than 30 years.
Converting Flying Transformers
The project of the American convertiplane VZ-2

According to its own scheme, convertoplanes can be divided into 2 basic classes, each of which is characterized by its own specificity and its characteristic problems of conversion and transmission of thrust developed by the power plant of the machine. We are talking about convertiplane with a swivel wing and convertiplane with rotary screws.

Aircraft with a rotary wing combine the characteristics of multi-engine aircraft, in which the engines are located on the wing consoles in a fixed position with the capabilities of vertically taking off and landing helicopters. This technical solution allows to achieve distances and flight speeds characteristic of the aircraft (also the possibilities for cargo transportation), together with the possibility of making a vertical takeoff and landing. During take-off, the wing of the apparatus data is set to a vertical position, and the propellers create the thrust necessary for the take-off of the car. During the transitional flight mode, the wing gradually returns to the horizontal position. After returning to the horizontal position, all the lifting force is created by the wing, and the propellers provide the thrust necessary for the horizontal movement of the vehicle.

At one time, a number of American aircraft manufacturing firms, as well as one Canadian company, experimented with similar devices, some of their experiments can be considered quite successful. For example, the American convertiplane with a swiveling wing X-18. The X-18 convertoplane had a rectangular-shaped fuselage and a high wing with a small span. In the middle part of the wing, 2 powerful Allen T40-A-14 turboprop engines were installed, which developed power in 5 500 hp. each. These engines were equipped with three-bladed turbo-electric propellers of opposite rotation “Curtis-Wright” (the diameter of the screws was 4,8 meter).
X-18 convertible with swivel wing

During the “helicopter” take-off, the entire wing of the convertible was turned together with the engines (around its longitudinal axis by 90 degrees). At the same time, the standard aircraft take-off was used to take off the device with a maximum load. In addition, in the tail end of the aircraft there was an additional Westinghouse J-34-WE turbojet engine, which developed thrust in 1530 kgf. His jet stream could change its direction in a vertical plane, which significantly improved the control of the convertoplane at low flight speeds.

In 1958, the first and, as it turned out, the only prototype X-18 was made. This tiltrotor passed a rather intensive cycle of ground tests, after which in the year 1959 was transferred to the Research Center. Langley, where 24 November, 1959, for the first time took to the air. Prior to the completion of flight tests in July 1961, the X-18 convertiplane managed to fly about 20 flights. The main reason for the end of his tests and the subsequent shutdown of the program was a malfunction in the mechanism for changing the propeller pitch that occurred during the last flight of the vehicle, as well as the fact that its engines "were not interconnected." During one of its further ground tests, the convertiplane X-18 was destroyed and ended its life in a landfill. However, it is worth noting that this convertiplane allowed us to collect a sufficient amount of data that was necessary for the construction of a heavier and more sophisticated convertible plane XC-142, which has 4 engines.

The second most common type of convertoplanes can be called a model with swivel screws. They are more widely used, at least among experimental aircraft for sure. The disadvantage of such models in comparison with classic helicopters is the need to have wings of a sufficiently large span. This is due to the fact that on such devices are often mounted near 2 sufficiently large screw diameter. This requires an increase in site, which is used to perform takeoff and landing. Since power plants consisting of several engines, which drive propellers, are used in the construction of many convertoplanes, the failure of one or several of them can be disastrous for the apparatus. With this in mind, in order to prevent a catastrophe in the design of multi-engine convertaplanes, it is often possible to find cross transmissions that allow you to drive several air screws from the 1 engine, which in turn leads to an increase in the mass of such vehicles.
Bell V-22 Osprey with rotary nacelles

It is worth noting that turning screws are usually not the screws themselves, but gondolas with them, as is the case on the Bell V-22 Osprey tweeter. This aircraft, which is in service with the US Marine Corps, is equipped with 2 X engines with Rolls-Royce T406 power in 6150 hp. each. The engines are located in special gondolas at the ends of the wing and can be rotated up to 98 degrees. Three-blade screws with trapezoidal blades are interconnected by a synchronizing shaft, which is laid inside the convertoplane wing. This shaft also allows the Bell V-22 Osprey to land only with the 1 running engine. In order to reduce the mass of the design of a convertoplane, about 70% of the apparatus is made of composite materials based on glass and carbon plastics with an epoxy binder, which makes its design 25% lighter than its metal counterpart.

Since this tiltrotor should be based on areas of limited size, it is equipped with folding wings and screws, which allows reducing its width on the ground to 5,51 meters. The crew consists of a 2 man, and an 24 paratrooper with his own weapon can be accommodated in his cargo bay. Convitoplane screws with a diameter of 11,6 meter to reduce weight are also made of fiberglass

With the wing extended, the width of the Bell V-22 Osprey at the tips of the blades is 25,78 meters. The length of its fuselage is the 17,48 meter. Machine height - 5,38 meters, with vertically mounted engines increases to 6,73 meters. The maximum take-off weight is slightly more than 27 tons, while the payload mass when using the vertical take-off is 5 445 kg. The weight of the load on the external sling is when using 2's 6 147 hooks kg. The maximum speed of the convertoplane in aircraft flight mode is 483 km / h, and in helicopter mode, 185 km / h. Practical range - 1627 km.
V-22 in airplane flight mode

It should be noted that the only serial convertoplane is costly to the US budget, and the number of purchased machines is revised downwards over a number of years. Its prices range from 71 to 58 million dollars per unit. At one time, the senator John McCain, so much disliked by Russians, gave him the following description: the V-22 looks great in the sky ... when he is not idle for repairs.

Information sources:
-http://www.bratishka.ru/archiv/2012/09/2012_9_15.php
-http: //sw-master.narod.ru/fly_sh_3.htm
-http: //nvo.ng.ru/armament/2006-03-31/6_convertoplan.html
-http: //ru.wikipedia.org/wiki
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avt
    +3
    18 January 2013 10: 06
    A good article, calm and without fanaticism, a review of the topic with a historical excursion good to the author +.
  2. +1
    18 January 2013 10: 43
    Thank you for the article. It is interesting in Russia that a program is underway to create convection plans.
    1. 0
      18 September 2014 07: 34
      Officially, no. Unofficially - I'm building.
  3. +1
    18 January 2013 11: 18
    The article is good, but the point of creating such machines? A machine that is neither a helicopter nor a plane, return to the era of screw machines if only?
  4. 0
    18 January 2013 13: 22
    It is unclear what McCain wanted to say about repairs or maintenance, and these are two big differences. The V-22 had problems with the tightness of the oil system, but it was modified. And the fact that Osprey was actively used in the war against Libya in the form of transporters, and before that in Afghanistan (and even one was installed weapons), speaks of the reliability of the design.
  5. 0
    18 January 2013 13: 48
    To be honest, it is unclear what a tiltrotor is better than a transport helicopter? Efficiency? So the difference in the cost of cars in my opinion completely eats up all the savings.
    1. +2
      18 January 2013 15: 25
      Thanks to aircraft capabilities, its range is 2 or more times greater than that of helicopters, the speed is also higher, it makes less noise.
      This machine is very good for casting and evacuation of special forces / saboteurs. The operation to eliminate bin Laden seems to have been carried out with these machines.
      1. 0
        18 January 2013 17: 25
        rkka And what kind of distances are we talking about?
        1. 0
          18 January 2013 17: 30
          Flight characteristics


          Maximum speed:
          in airplane mode - 463 km / h;
          in helicopter mode - 185 km / h.
          Cruising speed - 396 km / h (at sea level).
          Range:
          combat radius - 690 km;
          the radius of action during the landing load is 722 km;
          practical range - 1 km (without refueling);
          with vertical take-off - 2 km;
          at take-off with a short take-off - 3 km;
          ferry range - 3 892 km (with refueling).
          Practical ceiling - 7 620 m;
          with one engine - 3 139 m.
      2. +1
        18 January 2013 17: 28
        No, there was a modernized version of Black Hawk. But yes, the machine is interesting and useful, it has a number of extremely interesting functions.
        1. +1
          18 January 2013 17: 57
          thanks for the flight performance, but the better it is at long distances, except for vertical take-off, the helicopter performance is not particularly impressive. Reliability is in question
          1. -1
            18 January 2013 18: 02
            What exactly is the reliability in question?
            1. +1
              18 January 2013 18: 18
              Can this machine fly on one screw? Plus, personally, it seems to me that the rotation mechanism of the engines itself adds unnecessary complexity to the entire structure.
              1. -1
                18 January 2013 18: 21
                with one engine - 3 139 m.

                1. +1
                  18 January 2013 18: 24
                  But he certainly will not be able to plan. And what weight can he take?
                  1. +1
                    18 January 2013 18: 34
                    Google banned you? See for yourself, it’s not so difficult.

                    The report on the second stage of operational tests noted that the tiltrotor V-22 has significant advantages over the CH-46 (53) helicopters which it is intended to replace. The advantages are greater speed and range, a large payload mass, more advanced on-board systems, less preparation time for the mission, better navigation equipment, less crew load during the flight, less vulnerability to air defense assets. It was also noted that 4 had resolved the main safety problems that had led to the loss of X-NUMX converters in the 2000 year. Two of these problems are directly related to the “vortex ring” effect. When performing tasks, squadron crews of VMX-2 did not enter the modes that are close to the occurrence of this effect. It was succeeded to exclude hit in the given modes thanks to revision of tactics of use of the devices V-22 and modification of the piloting technique. At the same time, the report indicated the need to finalize the winch for lifting people, meteorological radar system and airborne defense complex.

                    The suitability of the convertoplanes for flight was assessed by 4 parameters: the number of flight hours before failure, which led to the cancellation of the flight (25 hours with the requirement of 17 hours); mean time to failure (1,4 hours at the request of 0,9 hours); the number of man-hours spent on preparatory work for 1 flight time (7,2 hours if 20 hours are required); fleet health (from 78 to 88% with 82%). During 751,6 raid time, 30 failures were recorded that were incompatible with the execution of the task, as well as 552 medium and minor failures.

                    The disadvantages were the insufficient power of the air conditioning system, which is why it is very hot in the cabin at high ambient temperatures. It is also indicated that the tiltrotor cannot land in autorotation mode in case of failure of both engines at altitudes of less than 500 meters. At the same time, a number of experts do not consider this drawback to be critical, since, as experience shows, even landing a regular helicopter, especially carrying a load, in this mode does not often succeed
                    1. Cavas
                      0
                      18 January 2013 18: 36
                      Quote: Pimply
                      Google banned you?

                      The second time I see from you, this. What is the new feature? request
                    2. +1
                      18 January 2013 18: 39
                      Who prepared the report?
      3. 0
        18 September 2014 07: 52
        I completely and completely agree with your statement, as far back as 1943, studies were conducted
        A study of propellers conducted at NASA showed that a compromise solution could be found and a propeller called the “unloaded propeller” could be created, for which a relatively high relative efficiency in vertical take-off and landing modes and, at the same time, high efficiency in horizontal flight could be obtained. (r | = 0,65 - 0,85) to speeds corresponding to the number M = 0,8
        (this is around 800 km / h)
        . It was found that in the range of flight speeds from 0 to 400 km / h, changes in the rotational speed of the propellers are not required, with an increase in speeds from 400 to 640 km / h, it is desirable, and at speeds of more than 640 km / h it is necessary. Propellers must be articulated for the blades to reduce the stress in the blades and bending moments.
        http://www.k2x2.info/transport_i_aviacija/amerikanskie_samolety_vertikalnogo_vzl

        eta / p11.php
        For reference, record helicopters do not exceed speeds of 500 km / h, and even then, with excessive fuel consumption, by analogy with race cars: Only speed! And consumption does not matter ...
  6. +1
    18 January 2013 14: 24
    It’s a pity that Russia doesn’t have such a machine, there would be an application.
    1. +2
      18 January 2013 15: 48
      There is a project for three decades - Mi-30:

      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ми-30
      1. +1
        18 January 2013 18: 04
        and such a miracle ...
        1. 0
          20 January 2013 09: 47
          And this is not a tiltrotor. This is a rotorcraft.
  7. +1
    18 January 2013 15: 44
    In the USSR there were draft convertiplanes, but all were closed due to riskiness. In this type of aircraft it is very difficult to solve a number of problems, the largest of which is vibration. USA V-22 has been doing for over 20 years. The project originated in the late 80s, and the first flight made this unit in 1989.
  8. biglow
    -1
    18 January 2013 16: 01
    Dead end of aviation development, damage to one of the engines and to everyone who is on board the end
    1. +4
      18 January 2013 16: 35
      The screws with three trapezoidal blades are interconnected by a synchronizing shaft, which passes inside the wing. This shaft also provides the ability to land the aircraft on a single engine.
    2. biglow
      0
      18 January 2013 20: 39
      biglow,
      In vain, in the Soviet era, prototypes were created, but things didn’t go further, if the direction were promising it would be promoted.
  9. 0
    18 January 2013 18: 00
    for transformers the future, who does not believe in it, is that retarded fool ...
    1. ICT
      0
      18 January 2013 21: 26
      these devices are from another series
      1. 0
        18 January 2013 21: 32
        Quote: TIT
        these devices are from another series

        As I understand it, autogyros?
        1. ICT
          +1
          18 January 2013 21: 54
          Quote: studentmati
          As I understand it, autogyros?


          gyroplanes do not have a rotor without an engine, and this is something like

          http://topwar.ru/21090-proekty-letatelnyh-apparatov-tipa-vintokryl-chast-i.html
      2. 0
        20 January 2013 17: 20
        there is a
        http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2013/702/iezp982.jpg
        more
        http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2013/171/ygug192.jpg
        1. 0
          18 September 2014 08: 06
          ... only the project - "... the paper will endure everything!"
  10. 0
    18 January 2013 20: 18
    Quote: lordinicus
    It is very difficult to solve a number of problems in this type of aircraft.

    I support Vladislav, the device is really very complex in terms of design and technology. And as a consequence of this, the high cost of production and operation.
    1. 0
      18 September 2014 07: 39
      What I am building is completely contrary to yours and lordinicus assertion, I checked on an aircraft model, personally designed, in a similar principle.
  11. 0
    18 September 2014 08: 11
    There is also such an option for civilian tiltrotor from AgustaWestland - but it is still just a project, and has drawbacks that will be revealed at the test stages, which will require a lot of alterations.