Space nuclear power plants

44
In 2009, the Commission under the President of the Russian Federation on the modernization and technological development of the Russian economy made a decision to implement the project "Creating a transport and energy module based on a megawatt-class nuclear power plant."
JSC NIKIET is defined by the Chief Designer of the reactor installation.
The Federal Space Agency issued NIKIET license No.981K from 29.08.2008 for the implementation of space activities.

Space nuclear power plants


From the interview of Yu.G. Dragunova RIA "News". Posted by 28.08.2012

Russia is actively developing atomic energy, relying on the colossal experience and knowledge accumulated over the decades of the national atomic energy program.
One of the pioneers in creating breakthrough technologies in our country and in the world is the Scientific Research and Design Institute of Power Engineering named after N.A. Dollezhal (NIKIET), celebrating its 60th anniversary this year. The specialists of the institute made an invaluable contribution to the defense capability of our country, developed projects of the first reactor for production armory isotopes, the first reactor plant for a nuclear submarine, the first power reactor for a nuclear power plant. Based on projects and with the participation of NIKIET, 27 research reactors have been created in Russia and abroad.
And today the Institute is constructing completely new reactors, working on the creation of a reactor facility for a unique megawatt-class nuclear power propulsion system for a spacecraft that has no world analogues.
RIA Novosti was told by Yuri Grigorievich Dragunov, Director-General Designer of NIKIET, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, about how the work on breakthrough areas of Russian nuclear science and technology is proceeding.
- The Institute creates a unique nuclear engine for the new Russian spacecraft. At what stage is this project now?
- All 60 years of its existence, the Institute follows the motto of the founder and first director of NIKIET Academician N.А. Dollezhal: "If you can - go ahead of the century." And confirmation of this - this project. The creation of this installation is a complex work of the SSC FSUE “Center of Keldysh”, RSC Energia, KBKhM them. A.M. Isaeva and the enterprises of the State Corporation "Rosatom". Our Institute is defined as the sole executor of the reactor installation and is defined as the coordinator of works from the Rosatom organizations. The work is really unique, there are no analogues today, so it is quite difficult. Since we are a design organization, we have certain stages, stages, and we go through them step by step. Last year we completed the development of a draft design of a reactor facility, this year we are carrying out a technical design of a reactor facility. A huge amount of testing is required, especially fuel, including studies of the behavior of fuel and structural materials under reactor conditions. The work on the technical project will be quite long, approximately around 3's, but we will prepare the first stage of the technical project, the basic documentation. Today we have identified and made a technical decision on the choice of a fuel element design option and a final technical decision on the choice of a reactor design option. And just a couple of weeks ago, they took a technical decision on the choice of the design of the core and its layout.
- And what problems are there? Is it really going so smoothly?
“Today we have quite a wide cooperation, more than three dozen organizations are participating in the development of the design of the reactor facility. All agreements on this topic have been concluded, and there is complete confidence that we will do this work on time. The work is coordinated by the project management board under my chairmanship, we review the status of work once a quarter. One problem, I can not say about it. Unfortunately, as elsewhere in all subjects, we have contracts for a period of one year. The process of conclusion is stretched out, and, taking into account the time for competitive procedures, we actually eat up time. I made a decision at NIKIET, we open a special order and start working on January 11. But the participants are much harder to attract. There is a problem, so today we have puzzled our participants to give plans before the development is completed for at least a three-year period. We are forming these proposals, and we will go to the government with the request to switch to a three-year contract for this project. Then we will clearly see the schedule and better organize and coordinate the work on the project. The solution to this problem is very important for the successful implementation of the project.
- It will be a purely Russian project, will you not attract any foreign partners for R & D?
- I think the project will be purely Russian. There is still a lot of know-how, many new solutions and, in my opinion, the project must be purely Russian.
- What will be the fuel in the space reactor facility?
- Fundamentally, at this stage of the technical project, we adopted a variant of dioxide fuel. The fuel that has operating experience in installations with thermal emission. We have made the fuel element sectional to ensure the conditions that have already been tested in existing reactors. Yes, this is a novelty, yes, this is an innovative project, but on key elements it should be worked out and should be in time in the time frame set by the presidential project.
- Are you considering the option of fuel overload in the installation?
- No, we do not consider the overload option today. This can be reusable, but we are counting on 10 years of operation, and I suppose, judging by the results of the discussion in the scientific community, with Roscosmos, that today the task of doing the installation work is not longer. Roscosmos is discussing an increase in plant capacity, but this, in general, will not be a problem if we do this project, implement it, and most importantly, test the ground prototype on the stand. After that, we can easily recycle it to great capacity.

Creation of nuclear energy and power plants for space purposes

At the Semipalatinsk test site from 1960 of the year to 1989 of the year, work was carried out to create a nuclear rocket engine.

Were created:

IGR reactor complex;
stand complex “Baikal-1” with an IVG-1 reactor and two workplaces for testing 11B91 products;
RA reactor (IRGIT).

Reactor IGR

The IGR reactor is a pulsed thermal neutron reactor with a homogeneous active zone, which is a stack of graphite blocks containing uranium assembled in the form of columns. The reactor reflector is formed from similar blocks that do not contain uranium.

The reactor has no forced core cooling. The heat released during the operation of the reactor is accumulated by masonry, and then through the walls of the reactor vessel is transferred to the water of the cooling circuit.


Reactor IGR


IVG-1 Reactor and Component Supply Systems







RA Reactor (IRGIT)


Results achieved

1962-1966 years

In the IGR reactor, the first tests of model fuel rods of NRE were carried out. The test results confirmed the possibility of creating fuel rods with solid heat exchange surfaces operating at temperatures above 3000K, specific heat fluxes up to 10 MW / m2 under conditions of powerful neutron and gamma radiation (41 start up was tested, 26 model TVS of various modifications was tested).

1971-1973 years

In the IGR reactor, dynamic tests of high-temperature NRE fuel for thermal strength were carried out, during which the following parameters were implemented:

specific energy release in fuel - 30 kW / cm3
specific heat flux from the surface of fuel rods - 10 MW / m2
coolant temperature - 3000K
the rate of change of the temperature of the coolant with increasing and decreasing power - 1000 K / s
nominal mode duration - 5 with

1974-1989 years

In the IGR reactor, tests of fuel assemblies of various types of reactors from the NRE, YAEDU and gas-dynamic installations with hydrogen, nitrogen, helium and air coolants were carried out.

1971-1993 years

Investigations of the exit from the fuel to the gaseous coolant (hydrogen, nitrogen, helium, air) in the temperature range 400 ... 2600K and deposition in the gas circuits of fission products, the sources of which were experimental fuel assemblies placed in the IGR and RA reactors, were carried out.

Comparative indicators of the results obtained at the reactor IVG-1
and by the NRE development programs in the USA


the USSR
Period of active actions on the subject 1961-1989
Spent funds, billion. $ ~ 0,3
The number of manufactured reactor installations 5
Principles of refinement and creation element by element
Fuel composition
UC-ZrC,
UC-ZrC-NbC

Core thermal density,
average / maximum, MW / l 15 / 33
Maximum reached temperature of working fluid, K 3100
Specific impulse thrust, s ~ 940
Work resource at maximum working fluid temperature, s 4000

USA
Period of active actions on the subject 1959-1972
Spent funds, billion. $ ~ 2,0
The number of manufactured reactor installations 20
Principles of refinement and creation integral
Fuel composition Solid solution
UC2 in graphite
matrix

Core thermal density,
average / maximum, MW / l 2,3 / 5,1
Maximum reached temperature of working fluid, K 2550 2200
Specific impulse thrust, s ~ 850
Work resource at maximum working fluid temperature, s 50 2400
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    17 January 2013 15: 57
    You need to go ahead and "Lead the century"!
  2. +4
    17 January 2013 15: 57
    We need this engine to grow in space, and the sooner the better. As can be seen on the schedule of domestic scientists have far gone from the United States under this program
  3. avt
    +8
    17 January 2013 16: 02
    Here's another good + owl article! I remember with bitterness how we were told in the 90s - why do we need space! What are you "scoops" stuck with their achievements! Here in America ...........!
    1. Denzel13
      +2
      18 January 2013 02: 06
      In the 90s there was a hunchbacked pretzel + EBN, which all destroyed the bastards.
  4. +6
    17 January 2013 16: 05
    According to the comparative characteristics of nichrome did not understand, but cool good
    1. S_mirnov
      -2
      17 January 2013 19: 47
      This is what you need! Nichrome is not clear, but the mood has improved. The "well-known" economists of perestroika acted in the same way, a bunch of incomprehensible terms, but the impression that he was. very smart knows what to do. We know what this led to. It's just that, unlike you, our rulers did not have the spirit at that moment to admit that they did not understand anything.
      1. 11Goor11
        +1
        18 January 2013 15: 03
        S_mirnov
        This is what you need! Nichrome is not clear, but the mood has improved. The "famous" economists of perestroika acted in the same way,

        Hmm ... But I understood what was being said, and I ... also liked it, and my mood also improved! What is this, an unplanned impact of "Kremlin propaganda"?
        You would have decided on your desires. And it turns out that everything that happens in Russia for you is definitely bad. Even if you develop new technologies, this is just propaganda, in your opinion.
        1. S_mirnov
          0
          19 January 2013 14: 06
          Well, what kind of propaganda? fool Well, where is it written about propaganda? There is clearly about understanding! The idea is simple: You understand - you give an assessment, you do not understand - you do not give an assessment or ask for an explanation!
  5. +2
    17 January 2013 16: 11
    Canadians remember our "Cosmos 954" laughing
    Progress is needed, otherwise we will remain cabbies, not space pioneers recourse
    1. mamba
      +3
      17 January 2013 16: 46
      Quote: RETX
      Canadians remember our "Cosmos 954

      They called it "Russian roulette" as it descended in orbit, but did not escape their fate.
      Here is the fall zone of the radioactive fragments on January 24, 1978. Some of them had radioactivity up to 200 x-rays / hour.

      The USSR pledged to pay Canada 3 million Canadian dollars of compensation.
      1. +3
        17 January 2013 19: 07
        Well then, remember Palomares, where the B-52 lost, in my opinion, 4 bombs. One of them was drowned in the sea, and the rest caused a very good plutonium infection ...
        Something they had in Greenland ...
        1. mamba
          +2
          18 January 2013 08: 15
          Quote: atesterev
          Something they had in Greenland ...

          If we extrapolate the trajectory of our satellite to the intersection with Greenland, then we will see. that he almost reached the base of Thule, where exactly 10 years before that the B-52G crashed, tail number 58-0188, which belonged to the 528th squadron of the 380th bomber wing of US strategic aviation. The uncontrolled aircraft flew north for some time, then turned 180 ° and crashed onto the ice of the North Star Bay, about 11 km from the runway of the base. The impact caused the usual explosive to detonate in the fuses of all four bombs, and although no nuclear explosion followed, the radioactive components were scattered over a large area, causing radiation contamination of the area. The flammable aviation fuel melted the ice, and the wreckage fell to the bottom of the ocean.
          The crew managed to leave the plane, but the co-pilot Svitenko, who was left without an ejection seat, tried to leave the car through the lower hatch, and received a fatal head injury. The remaining crew members, although they survived, received injuries of varying severity when ejecting.
          During the search, fragments of only three of the four bombs on board were found, and the fate of the fourth remains unknown.
          The cause of the fire on board the aircraft is the ignition of foam pillows due to a malfunction of the air intake valve from the engine's air duct to the heating system.
  6. +5
    17 January 2013 16: 20
    Good news, but just recently one "admirer of the USA" tried to prove that Russia was hopelessly behind.
    http://www.utro.ru/articles/2012/12/10/1088817.shtml
    .Do not wait, gentlemen.
    1. 0
      17 January 2013 19: 11
      If everything is as recently as possible, then wait :(
  7. Senzey
    +1
    17 January 2013 16: 33
    It remains only to bring the engine to mind and find practical application. If everything works out, honor and praise, pride for our designers. Let’s launch the first engine, then it will be possible to upgrade.
  8. +2
    17 January 2013 16: 43
    Everything is fine, only at startup take into account the reasons why! Our nuclear weapons are scattered across the mountains of Canada.
    1. balamut_x
      -1
      17 January 2013 16: 59
      Do you know the difference between what fell in Canada and what they are doing now?
      1. Volkhov
        +2
        17 January 2013 18: 14
        A small thermoelectric installation of kilowatts fell by 20 ... 40, now they are designing a larger reactor with a turbine of about MW, there is nothing new there, except for the location above the head.
        For some reason, they gave examples of NRE, which are generally different. They just gave their money, they draw something.
        1. mamba
          0
          18 January 2013 10: 56
          Quote: Volkhov
          A small kilowatt thermoelectric installation fell by 20 ... 40

          Cosmos-954 was equipped with an on-board nuclear power plant BES-5, also known under the code name "Buk", with a capacity of 3 kW and a working life of 1.080 hours. The facility had a homogeneous fast neutron reactor and a thermoelectric generator. The reactor worked on U-235, the total mass of which at startup was 30 kg. The installation itself had a mass of about a ton.


          In the entire history of space flights, 49 spacecraft with nuclear power plants were launched. We launched 36 satellites. 13 - USA. Seven of them crashed.
          1. -1
            18 January 2013 21: 25
            Quote: mamba
            In the entire history of space flights, 49 spacecraft with nuclear power plants were launched. We launched 36 satellites. 13 - USA. Seven of them crashed.

            As it was dangerous for people, it remains. And then WHO scratches turnips, why do so many people die from cancer ?? I am against unreasoned and dangerous technologies, under whatever pretexts they are not pushed! I want my children and grandchildren to be healthy and happy. And the territory of Russia (at least fields and pastures) is free from radioactive industrial waste. You can minus, but I know firsthand what technogenic radiation pollution is and what irreparable consequences it carries. am
  9. +3
    17 January 2013 16: 48
    It looks like we are seriously going to Mars! good
  10. grig1969
    +1
    17 January 2013 16: 54
    The resource of work at the maximum temperature of the working fluid, from 50 to 2400 - what is it: who knows? How to decipher this figure?
    1. +1
      17 January 2013 18: 15
      It is from 50 degrees to 2400 centigrade
      1. 0
        17 January 2013 19: 20
        This is the runtime in seconds for the two maximum temperatures. Higher temperature - less runtime
  11. Nechai
    +5
    17 January 2013 17: 26
    Space nuclear power plants are not only rabbits, tfoots, engines. The satellite also actively monitors the atmosphere, surface of the Earth and the water column of the seas and oceans. Actually, what they promised destroying in the North, Far, etc. RTV. As well as straightening from orbit to the television antenna, etc. A means of active information warfare is also capable of breaking through the enemy’s informal blockade and affecting its people.
  12. biglow
    +1
    17 January 2013 17: 27
    It’s quite interesting that how everything became with us and the Americans didn’t advance further.
  13. 0
    17 January 2013 17: 34
    It would be more likely to put it into operation
    1. 0
      18 January 2013 20: 29
      Quote: voronov
      It would be more likely to put it into operation

      That's interesting, but how will their spent satellite with such an atomic engine be disposed of? They will leave to hang out in space (then there will be a surprise for someone, maybe for us) Or will they be brought from orbit to a given area (where it will never be possible to live then) ?? belay
      If there are specialists, explain?
  14. anchonsha
    0
    17 January 2013 18: 15
    It is difficult to argue in this industry, this is something from the world of fantasy, the operation and calculations of something in mega-numbers ... Good luck to our nuclear scientists in the development of an essentially "perpetual motion machine"
    1. 0
      17 January 2013 19: 58
      A. Lyulka made a nuclear engine for an airplane in the middle of the 20th century. So fiction is not the term.
      1. 0
        18 January 2013 21: 36
        Quote: GregAzov
        A. Lyulka made a nuclear engine for an airplane in the middle of the 20th century. So fiction is not the term

        It's good that there were smart people in the USSR. It was forbidden to put this "miracle" on airplanes! Otherwise, now half of the country were freaks! Do you have any idea the consequences of such a plane crash ?? And no one can guarantee that the working fluid (jet release) will not be radioactive.
        For long-distance flights in space, such an engine is just that! But on earth, God forbid! Enough of us with Chernobyl. recourse
  15. +1
    17 January 2013 18: 29
    Humor first: it would be better if "Cosmos 954" fell on the White House in Washington)) than in the mountains of Canada.
    Now about the main thing: If only there were no leaks of secret information and innovative technologies of this project. Let them take care of this and take it seriously. I imagine how in the New World they bite their elbows and tear their hair on the ass .. and think: “Well, how could the Russians think of this ?!” yes they have bears walking in the streets in cities! Yes they are ..
    Here you have amer a figure of three fingers and a hand bent at the elbow))
    Z.Y. good luck to the designers.
    1. Misantrop
      +1
      17 January 2013 19: 27
      Quote: dimon-media
      If only there were no leaks of secret information and innovative technologies of this project

      As practice shows, even leaks do not save them in this matter. Because for work it is necessary not only to know HOW, but also WHY. But this is a problem. Westinghouse from the Russian fuel composition for all technologies has still not been able to master even the manufacture of fuel assemblies of normal quality. Swell and tear, not having worked and a third of the resource wink

      But Chubais, before his career take-off, was the Ministry of Taxes and Duties, washed test tubes and ran for beer for scientists wassat
  16. +2
    17 January 2013 19: 10
    And do not we work in the USA by investing our knowledge and resources? Tolya Chubais with his team nano has every entrance to it.
  17. biglow
    +1
    17 January 2013 19: 37
    where we could be if not for the 20 year failure, it’s scary to think.
    1. +3
      17 January 2013 19: 59
      Not only to think, but also to imagine. The fact that ahead of the rest is a hundred pounds. In some areas we are still ahead.
      You do not worry about 20 years of stagnation. It was architrual, but no catastrophe occurred, except for the separation of the republics. Yes, they stalled, they let it down somewhere .. but as they say, that it does not kill us, it only makes us stronger. Most importantly, the backbone remained and the ridge of Russia is not broken. we, like the Phoenix, have risen from the ashes and are growing stronger before our eyes.
    2. +1
      18 January 2013 06: 02
      biglow,
      Yeah, the whole west dochipor chills beats lol this is their nightmare and they see it for at least 400 years !!! hi
  18. 0
    17 January 2013 20: 06
    Where can I find six more Kirienoks? How did Rosatom take over, the smoke is already coming! His hand is clearly felt. Powerful, highly maneuverable (allowing sudden changes in loads. Photocells are a weak thing), heavy installation. This is either an orbiting city, or truly large spaceships. Well, or a lunar base, to begin with. But without a large-scale station, a person for 10-15 assemblers of hollow structures, our "space exploration" is still nonsense. So I think it's an orbital city.
    1. 0
      17 January 2013 22: 15
      in fact, large ships should be assembled in their orbits with intelligence - otherwise the bird will not fly up, or the fuel consumption will be too large. In general, our future is the colonization of the moon and moon shipyards, well, or some kind of orbital docks (yes, I'm a fan of science fiction wassat )
  19. SEM
    SEM
    0
    17 January 2013 20: 13
    Russia needs a breakthrough that will provide the necessary foundation for future space exploration !!!
    1. 0
      17 January 2013 20: 17
      This jerk occurred in 1957. Then in 1961.
  20. +1
    17 January 2013 20: 47
    dimon-media,
    so maybe it's time for another breakthrough. next, not last
  21. 0
    17 January 2013 22: 12
    Achievements are all old, sad. I want to believe that we have an ace in the sleeve, but it is very secret. good
  22. 0
    17 January 2013 22: 18
    Not a, it's never relevant. Here is the transition of the army to socks instead of footcloths, yes. How many comments the topic has collected
    1. Misantrop
      +1
      18 January 2013 00: 05
      Quote: komsomolets
      army transition to socks instead of footcloths

      Many more people understand this issue. laughing
  23. +2
    17 January 2013 23: 25
    I remembered an old case, when ours demonstrated a compact nuclear reactor at an exhibition, Western "experts" to the last, foaming at the mouth, argued that this could not be, because it could not be. To be clear, it was a long time ago, and only after the demonstration did they admit that they were mistaken. But it's annoying that later, all the information about this development went somewhere. And what is further unknown. Now there is infa about the SVBR-100 GK reactor, but this seems to be like another development, they plan to release it in 2019, but there’s silence about that. It's like a pro - Low-thrust nuclear engine, it was a promising project, the West invested a lot of money to screw it up. I think we will revive the forgotten. get it off the shelves, enough dust already.
    1. mamba
      +1
      18 January 2013 11: 15
      Quote: Averias
      when ours demonstrated a compact atomic reactor at the exhibition, Western "experts" to the last with foam from their mouths proved that this could not be, because it could not be, and only after the demonstration they admitted that they were mistaken.

      During the filming of the film "Hostile Waters" about the sinking of the K-219 nuclear submarine, the American director did not want to show a real nuclear reactor of this type of nuclear submarine. In her opinion, it was too reminiscent of something from space technology, which by definition the "Russian lapotniks" could not have. In her view, the reactor of the Soviet nuclear submarine was supposed to be a pile of rusty iron, from which radioactive water gushes out and no less radioactive steam whistles. fool
  24. 0
    17 January 2013 23: 31
    The work on the technical project will be quite long, about 3 years, but the first stage of the technical project

    The chicken in ...., the testicle in .... so far at the Wishlist level. One is glad that they are generally doing this.
  25. 0
    18 January 2013 07: 11
    Electromagnetic guns were also fantastic. Nothing to wait and see wink
  26. 0
    19 January 2013 17: 04
    People will develop at a slow pace while competing with themselves. Alien technology is already on Earth. Only we are blind with our minds to accept new information and selfish in self-confidence.
    Now is the time to pay attention to those who offer the most incredible inventions, but most importantly, who gives an exhaustive justification for their discoveries. BUT and this is no longer important. The change of generations takes place so quickly, and so that new people with a new worldview would be born. The process cannot be stopped.
    The upper limit of the possibilities of achieving energy potential has been reached. To expand it, fundamentally new technologies are needed, first of all, in the basics of understanding physical processes as processes. You can extract or reproduce exactly as much energy as people are able to take it. NOT anyone to pass on the relay.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"