Footage of the destruction of Ukrainian unmanned boats in the Black Sea by aircraft of the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy is shown.

64
Footage of the destruction of Ukrainian unmanned boats in the Black Sea by aircraft of the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy is shown.

Off the coast of the Crimean Peninsula, the Black Sea forces fleet regularly prevent attempts to attack Ukrainian unmanned boats. The maritime sector plays a huge role in ensuring coastal safety. aviation Russian Navy.

Footage of the destruction of Ukrainian unmanned boats in the Black Sea by Su-30SM aircraft of the Russian Navy has appeared on the Internet. Su-30SM and Su-24MR aircraft of the Naval Aviation of the Navy of the Russian Federation patrolled the airspace over the Black Sea off the coast of the Crimean Peninsula.



Aircraft crews discovered Ukrainian unmanned boats heading towards the peninsula. After this, a decision was made to destroy the enemy’s unmanned boats. The naval aviation aircraft completed the assigned task in full.




Note that the Ukrainian regime does not abandon attempts to attack the Crimean coast with the help of sea drones. However, in Kyiv they are well aware of the military senselessness of such attacks. But such operations are still carried out, even if they end in the destruction of unmanned boats. This persistence of the Kyiv regime is connected solely with the media effect of such attacks.






For the sake of exposure in the information space and demonstration to the Western and Ukrainian “public” of the possibility of attacking Crimea, the Ukrainian leadership is ready to sacrifice not only unmanned boats - very expensive, by the way, but also the lives of special forces soldiers, sending them on adventurous sabotage raids with a one-way ticket.

64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    25 November 2023 09: 06
    Obviously I didn't hit it on the first try.
    1. -12
      25 November 2023 09: 08
      naval aviation is on a starvation diet, when will they be allowed to breathe?
      1. +4
        25 November 2023 09: 22
        ...not from the first, but from the second....
        let the guys train. The speeds are different... nothing, they will adapt. The main thing is the result. It would be better to make a fool of ourselves in the databases... but the authorities know better.
      2. -4
        25 November 2023 10: 23
        Quote: Aerodrome
        naval aviation is on a starvation diet, when will they be allowed to breathe?

        This is true. An indicative case occurred two years ago, when a crew from this same ejection regiment was right in the parking lot. A transported major with 3 (three!) hours of flight time is not only the head of air-fire and tactical training, but also a 1st class military pilot. request

        1. +2
          25 November 2023 10: 42
          Dearest. You forgot to indicate that the total flight time on this type of aircraft is 367 hours.
          1. +2
            25 November 2023 11: 42
            One of the main principles of flight crew training is continuity. With long breaks in flight work, skills are lost, and sometimes it is quite difficult to restore them. Three hours on May 21, given that the school year begins on December 1, is negligible. It’s unclear where, with such and such breaks, yes, 1st grade. request
            1. 0
              25 November 2023 12: 09
              Is it common to downgrade in aviation? Did I understand you correctly?
              1. +2
                25 November 2023 12: 42
                There are permissible breaks in flights depending on the type of training. For example, attacking naval targets from simple/complex types of maneuver, piloting/navigating in adverse weather conditions, at night, etc. According to some of them, the break should be no more than 3 months, even for 1st grade. It is logical that if you do not fulfill the requirements, you will be left without a class.
                1. 0
                  25 November 2023 17: 30
                  Is it logical or is there an established order?
                  If there is order, then it is a discrepancy for the regiment commander, since he did not keep track.
                  1. -2
                    25 November 2023 21: 15
                    What do you think? The meaning of the comment was different: if the management level is so poorly trained, then what about the rest of the personnel?
        2. +4
          25 November 2023 13: 10
          For idiots on the cart. 1945 two amers took pictures in me262b. And then there's the catapult. Smeared both idiots on the hangar roof
      3. -3
        25 November 2023 10: 43
        naval aviation is on a starvation diet, when will they be allowed to breathe?

        What challenges does naval aviation face today?
    2. +6
      25 November 2023 09: 15
      The article is too biased. Let's start with the fact that recently drones have stopped causing serious damage, and even then just a few days ago they killed the boat commander. And before that, both the corvette and the large landing ship were hit. It was not for nothing that the fleet was taken away from Crimea.
      And these drones - we need to shoot down the drones, and not waste the resource of combat aircraft. So there is still work to be done and work on efficiency.
      1. 0
        25 November 2023 09: 34
        Quote: р_у_с_с_к_и_й
        And these drones - we need to shoot down the drones, and not waste the resource of combat aircraft. So there is still work to be done and work on efficiency.

        I caught your idea, but unfortunately there are few such drums that can barrage over the sea for a long time. let's fix it, time orders, everything will be.
      2. +2
        25 November 2023 11: 15
        And these drones - we need to shoot down the drones, and not waste the resource of combat aircraft.
        What then are airplanes needed for if their resources cannot be spent?
      3. -3
        25 November 2023 11: 34
        If you were there, everything would be much better!
    3. +2
      25 November 2023 13: 06
      AND ? Just something to throw on the fan?
  2. +12
    25 November 2023 09: 08
    It’s good that the boats were destroyed. But the fact that the bases from which they are launched and the arsenals where they are stored have not yet been destroyed is bad. Unfortunately, our intelligence, incl. and cosmic, “they don’t catch mice.”
    1. +8
      25 November 2023 09: 10
      They can also be supplied from abroad. I wonder why they don’t use ATGMs, the same LMUR, against them? But bombs with UMPC are also an option. The beginning of the mass use of RBK-500 cluster bombs made an indelible impression on Ukrainian society. There was howling and groaning in public pages and Telegram channels for several days. The general tone of the comments is indignation that the West gave “weak” cluster shells, curses addressed to “kats...ni” and... confusion. Ukrainian society for many months enjoyed footage of our military being killed by American “cassettes” and did not even think that these same weapons may be used against their sons, brothers and husbands. The reality was shocking.

      The Avdeevka industrial zone was taken from Yasinovataya;
      on the southern flank we entered the Vinogradniki gardening partnership.
      The capture of the industrial zone was a very unexpected success, because it is one of the most prepared places on Earth for defense.


      However, a difficult situation remains in the Kherson region. Despite the heavy losses from our attacks on Krynki, the enemy was able to accumulate forces and expanded the bridgehead in the forest. Telegram channels of military correspondents publish messages from fighters:

      about poor communications, leading to constant losses from “friendly fire”;
      about the acute shortage of reconnaissance drones, which makes it necessary to attack the enemy blindly;
      about the active work of enemy FPV drones and agricultural drones, known as “Baba Yaga”;
      about unsuppressed enemy artillery.
      “First Russian” has already written that the situation for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in this direction is a dead end. The enemy will not be able to develop a powerful offensive from the bridgeheads. However, the existing problems are costing our men blood and unnecessary deaths. In general, the situation is the legacy of the former commander of the Dnepr group, Oleg Makarevich, who was removed from office in October. Under the new commander Mikhail Teplinsky, conditions began to improve, but are still far from normal and favorable.

      https://m.dzen.ru/a/ZWDvE2VLb0k6AzDI
      1. +1
        25 November 2023 09: 14
        would be a good assignment for the FSB or Russian spies abroad.
      2. +3
        25 November 2023 10: 05
        Quote from Orange Bigg
        I wonder why they don’t use ATGMs, the same LMUR, against them?

        The Su-30SM does not know how to use them. And since these aircraft do not have sighting containers, the only real option besides the VPU is the KAB-500Kr.

        Quote from Orange Bigg
        But bombs with UMPC are also an option.

        No, the UMPC has satellite guidance, it can only work on stationary targets with pre-known coordinates.
      3. +3
        25 November 2023 11: 17
        But bombs with UMPC are also an option.
        The target is moving, what is the UMPC here? A few months ago they wrote that they were covered with cluster bombs from the Su-24
        1. 0
          25 November 2023 12: 48
          Quote: Aviator_
          A few months ago they wrote that they were covered with cluster bombs from the Su-24

          Almost nothing has been heard about the use of the Su-24. Although there are still quite a lot of them at our bases. Apparently, they are having a really hard time from enemy air defense. Maybe the use of “wings” will give them a second wind and then they will fly en masse to bomb?
          1. +3
            25 November 2023 14: 17
            The Su-24s remained with the Fleet Air Force, so there is almost nothing about them. Just like about the fleet lately.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      26 November 2023 11: 13
      What bases? Such a boat can be launched from any suitable shore. Issues need to be resolved at a different level, but our bosses won’t do this, otherwise they would have already done it
  3. +5
    25 November 2023 09: 10
    The speed and size of the target are not comparable, and that’s why it’s spinning in circles. Go become a sniper with 30mm. guns. request
    1. -7
      25 November 2023 09: 37
      Quote: Sergey39
      The speed and size of the target are not comparable, and that’s why it’s spinning in circles. Go become a sniper with 30mm. guns. request

      Well... this is some kind of “gun”.. the “warthog” is jealous. But, well, you need to build a new plane around the cannon.
  4. +5
    25 November 2023 09: 11
    We need to drive the ukrov away from the shores of the Black Sea with a filthy broom: let them dig something new for themselves.
  5. -1
    25 November 2023 09: 13
    The guns are extinguished by video. And they wrote that by factories (and at the beginning of the video, bombs are hung up).. If they are discovered, they are easily destroyed. In the slow-paced, jagged video, it looks like the plane is hovering “at six” near the boat, slightly equalizing the speed, making it easier to target, which means there is no fear of replies.
    1. +1
      25 November 2023 09: 40
      Quote: Xenaro
      The guns are extinguished by video. And they wrote that the factories (and at the beginning of the video - they hang bombs) ... If they are discovered, they are easily destroyed,
      wassat FAB - drones - easy? Yes, you...a schoolboy. The video, as always, is “illustrative”, assembled from all sorts of pieces.
    2. +2
      25 November 2023 09: 44
      Quote: Xenaro
      not afraid of replies

      My friend, the target is an unmanned boat. He doesn't know how to do airplanes, by definition. request
      1. -1
        25 November 2023 10: 01
        Yes, this is understandable, and I’m happy about it, but I would not exclude the possibility of something light - anti-aircraft - appearing there later. The boat is controlled - it seems there are options via an optical channel. An airplane doesn't need much. What I mean is that you need to be more careful when hanging from behind at low speeds.
    3. +1
      25 November 2023 12: 51
      Quote: Xenaro
      This means he is not afraid of answers.

      What is the answer? I think that the drone operator doesn’t even see the plane, except maybe the projectiles are heading
  6. -3
    25 November 2023 09: 20
    Quote: р_у_с_с_к_и_й
    The article is too biased. Let's start with the fact that recently drones have stopped causing serious damage, and even then just a few days ago they killed the boat commander. And before that, both the corvette and the large landing ship were hit. It was not for nothing that the fleet was taken away from Crimea.
    And these drones - we need to shoot down the drones, and not waste the resource of combat aircraft. So there is still work to be done and work on efficiency.


    AND? What solutions? What do you propose to do? How to improve efficiency? lol
    1. +4
      25 November 2023 09: 29
      It would be more effective to destroy these drones with a KA-52K helicopter, which, unfortunately, the Black Sea Fleet still does not have.....
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +4
        25 November 2023 10: 08
        Quote: next322
        it would be more effective to destroy these drones with a KA-52K helicopter

        I will support it, just right for small surface targets.
      3. +2
        25 November 2023 12: 56
        Quote: next322
        it would be more effective to destroy these drones with a KA-5 helicopter

        You can destroy them with all types of helicopters. Up to the Ka-226 or Ansat, which, unfortunately, are also not available. But I think it’s most effective to send fast and nimble Rapter-type boats to meet them. Yes, even a simple motorboat with a machine gunner on the bow is quite a suitable thing with proper external targeting at the target.
        1. +1
          25 November 2023 16: 10
          Up to the Ka-226 or Ansat, which, unfortunately, are also not available.
          There are helicopters. There are no engines for them yet, everything previous was from behind the hill.
  7. +1
    25 November 2023 09: 21
    Despite numerous attacks by Ukrainian drones and cruise missiles, planes remain at airfields without protective hangars or shelters.
    Life teaches nothing; for the military, a combat fighter for a billion rubles is not a personal car that is put away in a garage or under a shed...
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. 0
    25 November 2023 09: 22
    Of course, this is all good, but it is necessary to destroy their bases, if this is not done, there will not be enough aircraft. Not enough of a dead commander.
  10. +2
    25 November 2023 09: 23
    It’s strange why the plane comes across the boat’s course? It’s more difficult to get in and no one is opposing the plane
    The video is assembled from two parts, so you can’t hit the boat with a bomb
  11. +3
    25 November 2023 09: 24
    It’s interesting, but there is no other option other than chasing heavy fighters, using up an expensive resource? Maybe something easier would be suitable, like a Yak 130, or a helicopter? Or can these Yaks only on the Internet act as light attack aircraft?...
    1. -4
      25 November 2023 09: 29
      We don’t know what’s on the Internet, but people make decisions based on the actual situation. stop
    2. +4
      25 November 2023 09: 30
      Apparently reaction speed comes first here. The drone was discovered, the plane was quickly in place, and the helicopter would have a lower speed of this very reaction. Well, unless you do constant patrolling with a large number of helicopters.
    3. +2
      25 November 2023 10: 10
      Quote: Jovanni
      Yaks can only act as light attack aircraft on the Internet?...

      The question is which regiments are armed with these aircraft. So far, apparently, only educational ones.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    25 November 2023 09: 31
    A helicopter would cope with the task of destroying sea drones much faster and more efficiently...
    This raises the question why our Varshavyankas have not yet fired volleys of torpedoes at Ukrainian ports and military bases???
    The aligarchs won't allow it again???
    1. +1
      25 November 2023 09: 42
      Quote: assault
      Why haven’t our Varshavyankas fired volleys of torpedoes at Ukrainian ports and military bases yet???

      Truly, one alternatively gifted person can ask so many questions that a hundred wise men cannot answer.

      Storm. Kurochkin. Which one, whose fool
  14. -3
    25 November 2023 09: 32
    Why with a machine gun, and not self-capturing missiles?
    1. -2
      25 November 2023 09: 48
      Apparently the pilot has not yet upgraded his gaming class and cannot do it like in the usual Battlefield.
    2. +3
      25 November 2023 10: 04
      Because it's cheaper. The boats were destroyed anyway, and that’s the main thing.
      1. -2
        25 November 2023 13: 54
        That's it, is the information 100% correct? ........................................................ .
  15. -2
    25 November 2023 09: 34
    Quote: assault
    A helicopter would cope with the task of destroying sea drones much faster and more efficiently...
    This raises the question why our Varshavyankas have not yet fired volleys of torpedoes at Ukrainian ports and military bases???
    The aligarchs won't allow it again???


    Is it possible to write to the point without the stock standard bullshit slogans? stop
    1. -1
      25 November 2023 10: 04
      They haven’t been given new manuals yet laughing
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    25 November 2023 10: 23
    Quote: Aerodrome
    Quote: Xenaro
    The guns are extinguished by video. And they wrote that the factories (and at the beginning of the video - they hang bombs) ... If they are discovered, they are easily destroyed,
    wassat FAB - drones - easy? Yes, you...a schoolboy. The video, as always, is “illustrative”, assembled from all sorts of pieces.

    I graduated from school in 88. Didn’t you think that there was something you didn’t understand before issuing the definition?
    What is a fabom on a high-speed target - in the course, from the video - they are destroyed by cannons - I wrote about this. There was not a word about the illustrative nature of the video. The drones are clearly being extinguished. (a small target, not responding, doesn’t seem to be maneuvering much) But maybe it’s illustrative - but then what are these fragments with shooting? And I am alarmed by such calls without any expectation of a response.
  18. -5
    25 November 2023 10: 28
    Hmmm... A country without a fleet is a nightmare for an entire fleet (Black Sea Fleet)... Paradox...
    1. -4
      25 November 2023 10: 35
      Quote: curvimeter
      Hmmm... A country without a fleet is a nightmare for an entire fleet (Black Sea Fleet)... Paradox...

      Have you tried anything else besides "sea battle"?
    2. +2
      25 November 2023 10: 47
      The fleet is a very vulnerable thing.
      Long gone are the days when the fleet was a nightmare. However, like tanks, they are tanks, although not to the same extent. We need a new round of development of means of protection against cheap air-surface-underwater weapons. In the meantime, probably only intensive destruction of attack bases.
  19. 0
    25 November 2023 10: 58
    Hmm, you can tell from a cannon by sparrows. This task is for another class of aircraft, such as the Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano. Turboprop combat training attack aircraft. This would also be suitable for border guards to give nightmares to the DRG. Well, I think with a large number of boats, the drying ammunition (150 shells) may not be enough. Aiming time is short. 12 mm incendiaries should be enough for these troughs. It is necessary to create an aircraft or drone for armament of this caliber. Any P-47 of the Second World War, with its eight 12,7 mm Brownings, would have taken these boats apart with ease.
    1. +1
      25 November 2023 12: 19
      The Su-30 is an expensive pleasure to deal with boats. It is cheaper to use helicopters or drones, if they are available for such tasks.
    2. 0
      25 November 2023 13: 04
      I think it’s high time for our aircraft designers to take up the challenge of developing a simple and light attack aircraft (even a propeller-driven one). If modern designers do not have enough brains, then pull old designs out of the closet. Or even install machine guns on existing light aircraft. To destroy sea and flying drones, this will be quite sufficient and cheap. Any analogues of the bourgeois "Tucano" would be very suitable here
  20. -4
    25 November 2023 11: 44
    Quote: curvimeter
    Hmmm... A country without a fleet is a nightmare for an entire fleet (Black Sea Fleet)... Paradox...


    And are you strong in a nightmare? drinks
  21. 0
    25 November 2023 13: 14
    Purely to the telegrammers.... Su-27s don’t carry any wobbles from the word finally. We learn materiel. Let's buy expensive betredinov. No money? Then there’s no point in crap on the internet
  22. 0
    26 November 2023 03: 22
    Who said a gun is not needed? wink
  23. +4
    26 November 2023 11: 55
    What kind of people, they destroyed dangerous targets, I don’t like it - obviously I didn’t hit it the first time, wasted engine life,. It’s good that they are not criticized for the 30mm shells used, which are also probably not cheap.