ACTUV - Unmanned Robot Hunting Submarine Detection

28
ACTUV - Unmanned Robot Hunting Submarine Detection

ACTUV is a modern American project of an unmanned system designed to detect and track enemy submarines. The development of this vessel is under the order of the defense scientific agency DARPA. ACTUV (Anti-submarine warfare Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel) will use active echolocation to detect enemy submarines. It is assumed that court data will not receive any weapons and will only solve intelligence tasks, but this concept may undergo changes in the future.

The ACTUV creation program includes 4 stages. In August 2012, the completion of the 1st stage of the program was announced (at this stage, the feasibility of its implementation was determined, and other evaluation activities were carried out). The preliminary work schedule for the 2nd and 3rd stages is about 36 months, another 4 months are allotted for the 18th final stage. Accordingly, we are talking about the stages of development, construction and demonstration tests of an experimental sample. Robot-boats.



At present, some characteristics of the ACTUV apparatus, which are design ones, are already known:

- cruising range over 6 000 km;
- the ability to operate at a distance of 3 000 km from the base;
- the battery life of the order of 80 days;
- to detect enemy submarines, it is planned to use the active station GAR;
- the cost of one robot boat will be at the level of 20 million dollars;
- The service life of the order 15 years.


New details and details about the project ACTUV became available thanks to the video, which was published by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). The new project of the Pentagon is aimed at the development of robotic ships, which would be able to detect and monitor enemy submarines in a fully automatic mode without human intervention. The main reason for the development of this program was the threat that comes from the growth in the number of relatively inexpensive diesel-electric submarines, which can afford not only the governments of many developing countries, but also more or less large drug cartels.

Submariners have a saying that there are only 2 type ships: these are submarines and targets. These words are quite close to the truth, since modern submarines are one of the most destructive and secretive combat units in the entire vast arsenal of means created by mankind for waging wars. It seems that the Pentagon is seriously expecting to end the era of submarine rule in the ocean, calling for this purpose the robot hunter ACTUV. The defense department has already allocated about 58 million dollars for this project with a high priority.

It is assumed that this robot hunter in a fully autonomous mode will be able to search for enemy submarines for 60-90 days. This ship is planned to be fully integrated into the control system of the US Navy. In particular, it should aim anti-submarine target Aviation, and also to work with sonar buoys that were dropped from helicopters and aircraft. The main working tool for ACTUV should be sonar.


In case of detection of an enemy submarine, the robot hunter approaches it and transmits data about its location to the nearest warship. In this case, the unmanned ship may follow the submarine until it leaves the area of ​​its patrol or until it is destroyed. It is worth noting that the robot hunter doesn’t even have to hide at the same time, he may be engaged in scanning the ocean in the open, using a more effective radiating mode of his sonar. Of course, an enemy submarine will be able to destroy the robot, but at the same time it will surely find itself, without solving its main combat mission, for submarines armed with strategic nuclear missiles - this is unacceptable.

Separately, it should be noted that, unlike a large number of unmanned vehicles that are in the service of the military, the ship-hunter ACTUV does not have any weapons. The main task of the ship is to search, track and escort enemy submarines. In case of necessity of carrying out active actions, other ships and aircraft of the US Navy will have to enter the business. The hunter ship can operate completely independently, it will only be necessary for the person to control it when the ship leaves the ocean from a fairly busy port harbor.

Navigation of the ship in the autonomous mode is realized through a combination of the system of various onboard sensors and artificial intelligence. It is assumed that among these sensors will be long-range and short-range radar, electro-optical sensors, laser scanner LIDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) and other equipment. At that moment, when ACTUV will be close to the intended location of the enemy submarine, it will use a pair of high-frequency sonars that have an active “backlight” system, which allows increasing its range and accuracy of operation. Additional information about the submarine will have to be given by especially sensitive sensors-magnetometers. Based on all the collected data, the unmanned hunter ship will be able to build an image of a submarine and determine its type, identify the submarine and determine its belonging to a particular country.

All collected data will be processed by the system on the basis of artificial intelligence (it is assumed that it will be able to calculate even the nearest intentions of the enemy ship on a number of data obtained). So, for example, one of the fairly common tactics of evading submarines from detection is hiding under an ordinary ship that goes on the sea surface. Knowing about such a maneuver of evasion, the robotic ship-hunter will be able to independently pay more attention to those ships that move in a controlled direction in a given water area. Naturally, the artificial intelligence system will not be so perfect. An experienced submariner, in any case, with the help of his tricks will be able to leave the hunter ship in the cold, but in this case ACTUV can come under the control of a human operator who can independently correct possible system errors and direct the ship on the right search path.

The appearance of the first prototypes of the ACTUV spacecraft, which will undergo a program of fairly extensive sea tests, is possible only in a few years. But in the event that DRAPA is able to carry out these works successfully and bring them to a logical end, the new ACTUV hunter ships can be the factor that will change the rules of the game and counteract the submarines on the high seas.

Information sources:
-http: //www.arms-expo.ru/049057052048124051048050049053.html
-http: //www.dailytechinfo.org/military/4394-opublikovany-podrobnosti-proekta-sozdaniya-sudov-robotov-ohotnikov-za-podvodnymi-lodkami.html
-http: //blog.kp.ru/users/4052155/post256725165/
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    16 January 2013 11: 25
    but you can answer:

    autonomous mine-homing torpedoes, with refueling for example .. or reusable with nuclear warheads as a carrier ...
  2. +3
    16 January 2013 11: 35
    And how can this crap detect submarines on duty under the ice?

    In my opinion, the next budget cut pindosami.
  3. itr
    0
    16 January 2013 12: 03
    unmanned robot-hunter for detecting submarines, I think it should be a submarine itself and not a boat. Lay down and wait in the wings
  4. +1
    16 January 2013 12: 31
    I agree. But I believe that in the near future they cannot do it. And the detection area of ​​such a robot is unlikely to be significant. Such robots will have to build not one hundred but maybe a thousand.
    1. itr
      0
      16 January 2013 13: 56
      And why not lie at the bottom and wait
      1. 0
        16 January 2013 15: 00
        Can you imagine how many they need to build for this?
        1. 0
          16 January 2013 17: 53
          and how many regular submarines are now? So do you need hundreds of such scouts (thousands)? no. The same functions (except for combat), only cheaper by many times and without risk to the crew. Why should a robot have fewer options than an inhabited boat?
          1. Misantrop
            +1
            16 January 2013 18: 07
            Quote: Delta
            Why should a robot have fewer options than an inhabited boat?

            Because there is nobody to think on her board. And repair broken equipment in the sea (what is the crew usually busy in the autonomous area)
            1. 0
              16 January 2013 18: 13
              The drone exchanges information with the operator on the ground. What should the crew of such an observing boat think about? he does not need to make decisions, the robot only detects, monitors, transmits information. Therefore, it is called a boat because it should not and will not be constantly under water. He does not need this, he has no one to hide from, especially given that he will follow using active echolocation. For some reason, drones in the sky have proven themselves only on the positive side, but in the sea they must immediately refuse))
              1. Misantrop
                +1
                16 January 2013 22: 21
                Quote: Delta
                The drone exchanges information with the operator on the ground.

                6000 km away? In a peaceful and calm time, there will be problems. And if a squadron is wandering nearby, or did the jammer make a mistake? In addition, if she crap without a master crap worth under 20 million bucks, this ... a great temptation winked
                Quote: Delta
                For some reason, drones in the sky have proven themselves only on the positive side.

                Probably because no one has tried to send drones, for example, from the USA to fly over Europe ... winked
                1. +1
                  16 January 2013 23: 50
                  6000 km away?

                  And the satellites have all fallen?))

                  Probably because no one has tried to send drones, for example, from the USA to fly over Europe

                  So they will try.
                  1. Misantrop
                    +2
                    16 January 2013 23: 55
                    Quote: Delta
                    So they will try.

                    So I'm talking about the same thing, let them try, but more wassat I can also offer them the idea of ​​the same plan - a sledge-caterpillar or walking unit with a drilling rig. Run on ice in the Arctic and drill holes for hydrophones. To catch submarines too laughing
          2. 0
            17 January 2013 18: 11
            This is if you know the route of the submarines.
      2. Misantrop
        +3
        16 January 2013 18: 05
        Quote: itr
        lie at the bottom and wait

        What is waiting for the coming of the next civilization? wink In patrolling areas, depths are rarely less than 2 km, there are several "jump layers" up to the depth at which submarines are walking. It is unrealistic to maintain communication with them, only VLF pass there, and this requires an antenna more than one and a half km long laughing
  5. i.xxx-1971
    0
    16 January 2013 12: 58
    In my opinion, the conditions are of acceptable efficiency: there should be a lot of them, autonomy should be at least twice as high, the weapons must have on board full tracking and target detection tools and extremely secure communication channels. Over time, such a robot as a frog in a hippo turns into an ordinary submarine.
  6. -1
    16 January 2013 13: 09
    According to one infa, such pilotless underwater vehicles snoop around the US coast, scaring off whales. While in test mode.
  7. 0
    16 January 2013 14: 59
    Where does this infa come from? Don’t share the link?
    1. 0
      16 January 2013 15: 43
      Quote: GreatRussia
      Where does this infa come from? Don’t share the link?

      It doesn’t work out. I accidentally saw it on one forum for a long time. I constantly clear the download cache. Although it is delayed in my memory. smile
  8. Kir
    0
    16 January 2013 17: 55
    In some issue of "Marine Collection" I read that in the ocean there are phenomena-layers that reflect a signal and quite cunning submarines use this, amers that solved this problem? And with regards to the fact that the boat cannot destroy it without finding itself, not the fact that they will not create a hunter for a hunter, who will be part of the standard weapons of submarines going on patrol. And besides, it is not clear why then they created an underwater network of tracking sensor stations? In short, there are more questions than answers, and the drug lords from Latin America, wishes to find talented designers, that they bypassed the system izaodno forced the Yankees to spend money on something else!
    1. 0
      16 January 2013 18: 02
      "... I read that there are layer phenomena in the ocean that reflect a signal ..."

      this is called "jump layers". Different sea temperatures, density and salinity help to hide the submarine from the acoustic beam, refracting it and reflecting not from the boat, but from the layer. They also say - "liquid soil". But, it is worth explaining that "liquid soil" is found only in certain areas, usually with shallow and medium depths, and are seasonal. So don't take this as a 100% guarantee of boat stealth. This layer still needs to be found and used in time and be able to.

      "... not the fact that they will not create a hunter for a hunter, who will be part of the standard weapons of submarines going on patrol ..." -

      until created, we have what we have

      "... And besides, it is not clear why then they created an underwater network of tracking sensor stations?"

      The SOSUS system does not completely cover the ocean, does not serve as an ideal tool for reconnaissance, object detection
  9. Misantrop
    +4
    16 January 2013 18: 15
    Oh, soon the Yankees would invest in this program as soon as possible. Perhaps for something more sensible money will not remain laughing Imagine this crap with GAS systems in the ACTIVE mode (otherwise, what the hell will she find). Have you tried to run around the night city with the siren turned on? That's about the same wassat They will be VERY audible from afar, so there is no difficulty in evading work. And as a countermeasure from it, a low-speed economical torpedo with recorded noise, let it catch it, adjusting. I met such lieutenants with us, and since then, how many years have passed. You just need to refine it a little bit: how this seeker will reach a close distance - oncoming guidance and undermining, this noisy does not need much winked
  10. 0
    16 January 2013 18: 27
    Well, if they really cost 20 million Baku, then it makes sense. How many submarines they have, and now imagine how much they can make these toys, so I scattered them at their border, and at the border of a potential enemy, say China (with Russia, given the length sea ​​border it will be much more problematic), and submarines are strained ...
  11. +2
    16 January 2013 21: 50
    We tie the towed buoy to the airship equipped with a solar battery, a channel to the satellite and video cameras. As a result, we have a global game - "Find a submarine" with real bonuses. No operators or artificial intelligence required.
    Then we observe with interest who, in pursuit of a long banknote, will surrender more of their submarines.
    1. Misantrop
      +1
      16 January 2013 22: 33
      Quote: shurup
      We tie the towed buoy to the airship equipped with a solar battery, a channel to the satellite and video cameras. At the exit we have a global game
      For some reason, everyone imagines the Atlantic and the Pacific in the form of such a large "basin" without storms, hurricanes, shipping, etc. A nuclear aircraft carrier sometimes has serious problems from the weather, what can we say about a boat or an airship ...

      Well, what about
      Quote: Delta
      He does not need it, he has no one to hide from
      there is also a big question. For any country that has a submarine in a military campaign, this boat is a real enemy and a spy. Even if it is an ally country. Knowing where their boat wanders, redirecting search forces and means to it, thereby taking your own out of the hunting zone, is easy. Plus, these robots will pose a serious problem for shipping (the recklessness of the US operators is known to everyone, and even if the operator himself is not in danger at the same time - even more so). Run robots-mopeds of the traffic police on a busy highway wink
  12. +2
    17 January 2013 04: 43
    I think they will disappear with enviable regularity)))
    1. 0
      17 January 2013 07: 56
      Does our satellite tracking system type fail? Who will this device track if it is visible anywhere in the world?
  13. 0
    17 January 2013 09: 00
    If they fit in the price (20 lemons), then I think they can make a lot, for them it’s not money. Only strategic apl close to their shores is not required.
  14. +4
    21 January 2013 19: 30
    What kind of engine will this robot have that will be able to provide him with underwater travel for 3200 miles and underwater autonomy for 90 days? What are the means of communication that provide the operator with such sophisticated control in the underwater position? And where will the operator be located - on the coast base or on the ship? Some questions.