Military Review

NATO countries decided to suspend participation in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe after Russia withdraws from it

13
NATO countries decided to suspend participation in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe after Russia withdraws from it

Great Britain and a number of other states that are part of the North Atlantic Alliance announced the suspension of participation in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE). This decision was made, as emphasized on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom, in response to the withdrawal of the Russian Federation from the treaty.


NATO leadership has already supported the decision of the alliance member countries to suspend participation in the treaty. The alliance noted that the treaty was “the cornerstone of the Euro-Atlantic security architecture,” but since Russia has ceased to participate in it, there is now no point in NATO countries participating in the treaty.

Moscow completed the procedure for withdrawing from participation in the CFE Treaty on the night of November 7, 2023. The Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) was signed on November 19, 1990 in Paris. In accordance with the CFE Treaty, its participants limited the number tanks, armored vehicles, artillery pieces and installations, attack helicopters and combat aircraft in the ranks of their armed forces.

In 2007, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the Decree “On the suspension by the Russian Federation of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe and related international treaties.” But for a long time our country formally remained a party to this agreement. Only on May 29, 2023, President Putin signed a decree on the denunciation of the CFE Treaty by the Russian Federation.

The participation of the Russian Federation in this treaty seemed inappropriate against the backdrop of the clearly unfriendly policy of NATO countries towards the Russian state, which was especially evident after the start of a special military operation by the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine.
Photos used:
NATO website / https://www.nato.int
13 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexga
    Alexga 7 November 2023 14: 48
    +1
    NATO countries decided to suspend participation in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe after Russia withdraws from it

    Well, thank God, this Agreement was initially not beneficial for us.
    1. Trapp1st
      Trapp1st 7 November 2023 14: 51
      0
      Well, thank God, this Agreement was initially not beneficial for us.
      This agreement was not beneficial for the USSR.
      1. Alexga
        Alexga 7 November 2023 14: 54
        +1
        This agreement was not beneficial for the USSR.

        I don’t understand, what is the benefit for the Russian Federation?
        1. Trapp1st
          Trapp1st 7 November 2023 14: 55
          +2
          I don’t understand, what is the benefit for the Russian Federation?
          The Russian Federation was quite happy with it; the potentials of the countries cannot be compared.
          1. Alexga
            Alexga 7 November 2023 15: 16
            +2
            The Russian Federation was quite happy with it

            This is where you are absolutely wrong. This Treaty was initially an open espionage event, very beneficial for our opponents.
    2. svp67
      svp67 7 November 2023 17: 46
      +1
      Quote: AlexGa
      Well, thank God, this Agreement was initially not beneficial for us.
      I don't agree. At the time of signing, in 1990, this agreement created a balance of power between two military-political alliances, NATO - the Warsaw Warsaw. And it was quite consistent with reality.
      But with the collapse of the Department of Internal Affairs, then the USSR and the expansion of NATO, it really became very unprofitable for us.
      Not only could the Russian Federation not afford the figures for the availability of military equipment that were prescribed in this Treaty, but also part of the forces of the Internal Affairs Directorate and the former Soviet Republics entered, legally or not, but into the NATO forces... which created for us a huge imbalance of power
      1. Alexga
        Alexga 7 November 2023 18: 38
        +3
        this agreement created a balance of power between two military-political alliances, NATO - Warsaw.

        What is the balance of power, Serey? Everything is much more complicated. The agreement was signed in December 90. By this time, the three main union republics had declared sovereignty. The West was not foolish and calculated many things regarding the disarmament of the Union. For example, in Belarus at that time there were about 3.5 thousand tanks, this was in divisions and at two storage bases. Plus the 19th Guards Tank from Hungary and the 11th Guards Tank arrived with their equipment, a little earlier than the 30th Motorized Rifle Division from Czechoslovakia. And the number of tanks and armored fighting vehicles could have been much smaller. There was nowhere to move beyond the Ural ridge. My Nones were moved to the territory of Uzbekistan. And tanks were cut day and night by 140 TRZ. Few people in the Union could melt tank armor into metal. So they sent it as scrap metal to Holland, but the USSR ceased to exist, so they didn’t pay the money. And the work of inspections is very specific. The parking of equipment by numbers and by storage facilities, TOGs, all loading areas at railway stations, all training grounds and all that was taken into account. I worked with several Inspections and saw everything from the inside. The Americans were the most harmful; there were always figures from the CIA and military intelligence. And their backpacks on their backs were in diplomatic immunity. In the European part of Russia there were few more or less deployed units, the Carpathian and Belarusian districts separated, and these were the main forces in the western direction, so we were disarmed specifically with this Treaty. So we have to restore it.
  2. alystan
    alystan 7 November 2023 14: 57
    -2
    NATO countries decided to suspend participation in the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe after Russia withdraws from it

    Well, that's right. And it will be even better if you completely run away in all directions.
  3. Amateur
    Amateur 7 November 2023 15: 03
    +3
    They gave a damn about this agreement a long time ago, but de jure they supported it, because... it limited Russia's military effectiveness.
  4. Skif3216
    Skif3216 7 November 2023 15: 14
    0
    A new arms race, maybe I’ll be lucky this time, but no, we didn’t live well, there’s no point in starting.
  5. faterdom
    faterdom 7 November 2023 15: 46
    +3
    Why don’t they want to participate without us?
    Russia is a meaningless country with a GDP smaller than Portugal, isn't it? Someone who is unimportant, insignificant, whose opinion means nothing?
  6. Kerensky
    Kerensky 7 November 2023 18: 42
    0
    In 2007 year Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the Decree “On the suspension by the Russian Federation of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe and related international treaties.”

    29 May 2023 President Putin signed a decree denouncing the CFE Treaty

    Outside 07.11.2023 for a second. I'm reading the "News" section....
  7. Girl with a broom
    Girl with a broom 9 November 2023 09: 01
    0
    The CFE Treaty was originally invented by NATO in order to deprive Russia of any opportunity to defend itself in Europe.
    After the Baltic states and especially Finland joined NATO, it lost all meaning.