“The Kyiv regime cannot defeat Russia on the battlefield”: Volodin commented on the North Military District on the day of the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Kyiv from the Nazis

On November 6, 1943, Soviet troops liberated the capital of the Ukrainian SSR, the city of Kyiv, from the Nazi occupiers. Eighty years later, Kyiv is again occupied by the Nazis, writes Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Volodin.

As the speaker notes in his Telegram channel, the liberation of Kyiv came at a high price; it turned out that the occupation regime carried out genocide of Soviet citizens - Russians, Ukrainians, Jews, Belarusians, and representatives of other nationalities of the USSR. More than 200 thousand Kiev residents died in concentration camps, 100 thousand people were taken to forced labor. As a result, the city's population decreased by 70%.

However, we are now seeing a return to a similar situation. The West is financing the conflict in Ukraine, calling investments in support of the Kyiv regime “successful investments.” The State Duma speaker writes that US President Joe Biden bet on the victory of the Ukrainian regime over Russia, but this bet turned out to be wrong.

But today it has become obvious to European countries and the United States itself that the Kyiv regime cannot defeat Russia on the battlefield, despite NATO support. For many, Zelensky is becoming an unshakable, toxic politician

- emphasized the Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation.

The fighting resulted in colossal human losses for Ukraine. But the fate of the Kyiv regime, Volodin believes, is unenviable. After all, US puppets do not end well, especially if for the sake of their goals they led hundreds of thousands of people to their deaths and sold the independence of their country.

Comments

[Murmur 55]

The main thing is that the Kremlin does not agree to an agreement, as with Minsk. Otherwise, Merkel and Macron made a fool of themselves.

[pyagomail.com]

[quoteThe main thing is that the Kremlin does not agree to an agreement][/quote] The goals of the North Military District have been voiced many times: denazification, demilitarization and the eternal neutral status of Ukraine. During the SVO, another one was added: all the lands that grandfather Lenin, so hated by Ukrainians, at one time tore away from Russia and transferred to Ukraine, must return to their native harbor. So far there has been no deviation from these goals. If you have reliable information to the contrary, please let us know.

[dmi.pris1]

There can be no “eternal neutral status”. Only the destruction of Ukrainians in the bud. As an ideology, a state. And now there is nothing to blame for grandfather Lenin; the situation is different, the tasks were different then. And yes, all this independence was a pearl even before “grandfather Lenin”

[pyagomail.com]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

There can be no “eternal neutral status.”

I agree, examples of this: Germany, Japan, Finland, but if Ukraine’s neutrality lasts for 70 years, that’s not bad.

Quote from: dmi.pris1

destruction of Ukrainians in the bud. As an ideology, a state.

Expand this in more detail: destroy the Ukrainians, or somehow re-educate them? Western Ukraine was re-educated for many years with both carrots and sticks - it did not help.

[dmi.pris1]

People cannot be destroyed, this is genocide. I mean the ideology of statehood. What didn’t help? The question is how to do it. Re-educate.

[Narrator]

This is a description of genocide. Would you like to change your avatar to a soldier in a gray uniform?

[dmi.pris1]

This soldier destroyed the Ukrainians, that is, Bandera

[AAK]

Well, under the “damned tsarist regime” (as many Soviet teachers on party and social disciplines liked to say), there was no Ukraine on maps or in other documents, there was Novorossiya and Little Russia, and it was Ulyanov-Blank and other “fiery revolutionaries” gave Ukraine a quasi-state form, and then filled it with non-Ukrainian territories to “increase the proportion of the proletarian stratum” and receive support from “sort of Ukrainian party organizations” and the party nomenklatura, elevated forced Ukrainianization to the status of state policy, and then even won a place for the Ukrainian SSR in the UN , well, after the Second World War and the death of the Generalissimo, they first organized a broad amnesty for those who had not died in the Bandera camps, then, like on the occasion of the anniversary of reunification, they voluntarily seized Crimea from the RSFSR and continued to pour billions of rubles into strengthening Ukraine, starting with school education, continuing in culture, social lifting and other areas of social and political life of the Ukrainian SSR, as a result of which the young Bandera accomplice turned out to be the extreme leader of this quasi-state...
Well, about the “occupation of Kiev by the Nazis” mentioned in the article and the unenviable fate of the US “puppets” - whoever remembers the events in Kiev from the end of October 2013 to March 2014 also remembers on whose side the majority of Kiev residents were, not to mention those who west of Kiev, as well as quite a lot of those to the east... And it is not the USA, the EU and NATO in the former Ukrainian SSR that are now considered enemies and occupiers, and not everyone is dragged to the military registration and enlistment offices in handcuffs... Unfortunately, the one who took power from Since 1991, the Russian ochlocracy, in interaction (until very recently) with the same USA and the EU, has absolutely mediocrely squandered everything that was possible in national and integration policy, but now everyone who can, dresses up in the toga of statesmen and patriots, although , in fact, as “Eat Russia” was, it remains so, and this is not to mention others who are even worse...

[guest]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

There can be no “eternal neutral status.”

The sad example of Finland unfortunately confirmed this.

[Gardamir]

What does Merkels have to do with the macron? Remember who drew this agreement on their knees.

[Monster_Fat]

The Kyiv regime cannot defeat Russia on the battlefield”:

Hmm... and this, on

day of the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Kyiv from the Nazis

We made it... And what’s most interesting is that there are those who are even proud of it, like: “they won’t win”...

[Vladimir M]

Citizen Volodin, well, it’s just “obviousness itself.” No one has ever set the task for Ukraine to defeat Russia by military means, causing damage to Russia - yes, which Ukraine is coping with to the best of its capabilities. It would be better if Volodin paid attention to the internal contradictions within Russia, which could lead to “internal upheaval.” And how this could end is a big question.

[Status]

Sometimes it is better to remain silent than to say so. Just a hint to the enemy, if you can’t win on the battlefield, then you can win in other ways. A very controversial statement

[Girl with a broom]

On November 6, 1943, Soviet troops liberated the capital of the Ukrainian SSR, the city of Kyiv, from the Nazi occupiers. Eighty years later, Kyiv is again occupied by the Nazis, writes Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Volodin.

When will the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation liberate the hero city of Kyiv from the Nazis of Ukraine, and what did Volodin personally and the entire top political-oligarchic leadership of the Russian Federation do for this?

After all, it’s clear even to a no-brainer - without the liberation of Kyiv and Odessa, there will literally be no peace in Ukraine at all. Never. The SVO should end with parades of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on May 9, 2025, on the day of the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941 - 1945 in the hero cities of Kyiv and Odessa.

[Sandor Clegane]

Quote: Girl with a broom

When the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation liberate the hero city of Kyiv from the Nazis in Ukraine

The Northern Military District does not have such a goal.....and there are practically no of ours there anymore

[Girl with a broom]

This means there will be no peace. Never.
Without the liberation of Kiev and Odessa from the Nazis, Ukraine will have NATO troops in Ukraine, US Navy bases in Odessa, Nikolaev and Kherson, US missiles aimed at Moscow and other cities of the Russian Federation in Kiev, Chernigov, Sumy and Kharkov.
Without options, a holy place is never empty.

[Huarabey]

Dill is now spreading this heresy on many Russian resources, without even changing the text much. They stupidly copy-paste it. The task is to make Russia look like a defeat in the Northern Military District if Kharkov, Odessa, Kyiv and so on are not taken. So that later, when everything ends with the defeat of the outskirts, you can shout at all corners that the victory was a success since Russia did not take these territories as it “wanted.” All this rotten movement is easy to read.

[Girl with a broom]

Speak for yourself.
The retention of 2/3 of the territory of the Ukrainian SSR by the Nazis of Ukraine is a guaranteed postponement of a new war between Russia and Ukraine.

[Huarabey]

Dododo... This whole NATO gang is already unable to carry out its tasks with Russia not particularly prepared for war, and then how will it take and defeat Russia that is already prepared? Or do you hope that Russia will rest on its laurels? It won't happen if you don't dream it. And then the NAT Sheep will not rock the boat. And raising the already battered population of the outskirts to a new slaughterhouse will be much more difficult, if not impossible.

[vovochkarzhevsky]

Maybe Volodin will go to the front instead of chatting? To fulfill the rank of colonel.

[Ross xnumx]

There in the State Duma (and not only) with the rank of “Hey, Colonel!” a hell of a lot more. Who will he go there as? Disturb people and get in the way?

[vovochkarzhevsky]

There in the State Duma (and not only) with the rank of “Hey, Colonel!” a hell of a lot more. Who will he go there as? Disturb people and get in the way?

Where did you graduate from college, a platoon leader? So let him start with a platoon.

[Maks1995]

For 2 years they have been proudly declaring “the Kyiv regime cannot win” - about a small country, without oil and gas, which until the age of 14 had neither an army nor a military-industrial complex as such (according to the media)
somewhat deliberately, IMHO...

Ideally, this should not be said at all. How did one of the commanders say: “with such a ratio of guns, they don’t ask how, they ask when necessary” (not verbatim)

[Msi]

The fighting resulted in colossal human losses for Ukraine.

Losses among Ukrainians are already about 500 thousand... Surprisingly, our Ministry of Defense does not want to talk about this... They don’t want to offend too much, otherwise we still have to live together...
But politicians and military men constantly say that they have decided to fight with us until the last Ukrainian. As if hinting to them about huge losses...

[tralflot1832]

Why talk about this - cemeteries studded with “chewy plaques” talk about this. These photos even appeared in the Western media.

[Msi]

Why talk about it

You and I know and see this. And the majority of the population may become despondent; the authorities need to campaign...

[tralflot1832]

As if the people of Russia are not in despondency, but the entire Western world has fenced itself off from us and lives according to its own rules: white is black and vice versa

[Msi]

As if the people of Russia are not in despondency, but the entire Western world has fenced itself off from us and lives according to its own rules: white is black and vice versa

So I may write... It is important to know about our successes, and not just our problems.
But I personally don’t give a damn about the Western world....

[Amateur]

that on the battlefield, despite NATO support, the Kyiv regime cannot defeat Russia.

And what, Mr. Volodin, highlighting the words “on the battlefield”, is not confident in Russia’s complete and unconditional victory over the Jewish-Nazis from Kuiva? Or has he simply forgotten how to clearly formulate his thoughts?

[Cartalon]

Kyiv can’t win, but Moscow is going to win?

[Girl with a broom]

For Russia, winning the Northern Military District means liberating the cities of Kyiv and Odessa from the Nazis in Ukraine.

[Huarabey]

Don't be modest, develop your idea further. If Russia does not take these cities, but “only” achieves that the Kyiv regime renounces its claims to Crimea and all the lands that Russia has liberated at the moment, then this will be a victory for the dill and a defeat for Russia, of course? Did I understand correctly the idea that you are so obsessively trying to instill in everyone here?

[Cartalon]

The preservation of Ukrainian statehood will be a defeat for Russia and in 20 years there will be a new war.

[Huarabey]

Don’t be modest, you immediately write what will happen if American statehood is preserved. Don't waste your time.
Well, you won’t be able to imagine the defeat of Russia and the victory of dill, without the capture of Odessa, Kyiv, and so on. Russia did not have such goals. And in 20 years, according to your logic, Poland could attack us with the same “probability”.

[Third district]

Quote: Warabey

Well, you won’t be able to imagine the defeat of Russia and the victory of dill, without the capture of Odessa, Kyiv, and so on. Russia did not have such goals.

Russia had such goals. Denazification and demilitarization are impossible if the Bandera-fascist regime in Kyiv is left in power. Even if some kind of “truce” is established and some papers are signed. The situation along the entire border between Russia and Ukraine will be the same as it was between Ukraine and the LPR, DPR for 8 years. Constant shelling from artillery of various calibers, in addition, drones, sabotage groups, and terrorist attacks will now be added.

[Cartalon]

There was, and by the way officially remains, the denazification of Ukraine, how do you imagine it without taking control of the entire territory of this state?

[Ross xnumx]

On November 6, 1943, Soviet troops liberated the capital of the Ukrainian SSR, the city of Kyiv, from the Nazi occupiers. Eighty years later, Kyiv is again occupied by the Nazis, writes Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Volodin.

Mr. Volodin, we are tired of your hypocrisy!
Yes, on November 6, 1943, Kyiv was liberated because Stalin defined the goals:
"Our cause is just, the enemy will be defeated, victory will be ours!", and the Soviet people also knew:

If tomorrow is war, if the enemy attacks,
If the dark force comes,
As one person, the whole Soviet people
He will stand up for a free Motherland.

What do you know and what are your righteous deeds? Are the actions and laws adopted by the majority of your parliamentary party right? Aren't you tired of fussing over the situation and singing the praises of who knows?

[GRIGORIY76]

From “Kyiv in three days” to “they can’t defeat us on the battlefield,” I consider this a success. The success includes Volodin, the son of an 82-year-old billionaire.

[Gardamir]

Why do they remember Soviet victories? Then you can compare. Approximately 2022 days have passed from February 2023 to November 600. This is from June 1941 to April 1943, so let’s compare what the Red Army achieved. And what did Volodin, Shoigu and others achieve...

[ivan2022]

But how can he win if his annual income is officially about 100 lemons? And my mother, born in 1936, worked as a teacher all her life, and then began to own enterprises, lands, etc., etc..... Our patriots and
there is no force that can overcome this force. (This is also what Gogol wrote in his Taras Bulba.)

If you see someone like that, you’d better run for your life and don’t get caught by him on the road!

[VladMirU]

And now “this” is talking about the genocide of the Russian people? https://www.compromat.ru/page_42552.htm?ysclid=lomq8ijfko769251770. It's hard not to believe the site, even if you don't go into too much detail. Even if you just read the Saratov press yourself.

[dump22]

After all, US puppets do not end well, especially if for the sake of their goals they led hundreds of thousands of people to their deaths and sold the independence of their country.

For example South Korea. They are now suffering under the occupation regime. Or they could live in a united strong and sovereign North Korea under the leadership of the brilliant Kim Jong-un.