2013 Year: Borei, Mace and Fleet

62
Last week, the protracted epic with the strategic nuclear submarine Yuri Dolgoruky ended. Launched back in 1996, the submarine was finally accepted into the combat structure of the naval fleet Of Russia. In the last days of last year, the Ministry of Defense signed an act on the transfer of the boat, and now it has become a full ship of the Navy. Along with the acceptance of Yuri Dolgoruky into the fleet, they adopted the P-30 Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile, which, however, will be in trial operation in the coming year.




If you recall the events of past years, you can see that the constant shifts in the timing of the commissioning of the 955 submarines were caused precisely by problems with the main armament. Moreover, at a certain point, the leadership of the fleet and the Ministry of Defense even decided to develop a new missile system for the Boreyev. Ultimately, the rocket issue was the cause of such a long way for "Yuri Dolgoruky" to full service in the Navy. An indirect confirmation of such assumptions about the reasons for the change in the timing of adoption can be considered statements by the leaders of the country. It has been repeatedly mentioned earlier that within a few months after the delivery of the head Borei, it is worth waiting for the launch of the second boat of the project. The other day, the head of the presidential administration, S. Ivanov, confirmed such plans. According to him, the second nuclear submarine of the 955 project "Alexander Nevsky" will be commissioned before the end of the current 2013 of the year.

Thus, the new 2014 year of the Russian Navy will enter already with two new submarines of the fourth generation. Next they will be joined by “Vladimir Monomakh”, “Prince Vladimir” and four more submarines, which have not yet received names. Currently, three boats of the 955 project have come down from the stocks: the adopted “Yuri Dolgoruky”, being tested by “Alexander Nevsky”, and also the submarine “Vladimir Monomakh” launched at the very end of last year. The fourth boat of the series is being built since the middle of last year. In total, eight submarines of the Borey project will be built by 2020. It is noteworthy that the fourth ship of the series will be built in accordance with the updated 955A project, the main difference of which is the number of missiles carried. Thus, "Prince Vladimir" will be able to carry and use 20 missiles, and not 16 as previous submarines of the series.

It is worth noting that the Boreas are not the only new submarines that will join the navy in the coming years. Testing of the Severodvinsk multipurpose nuclear submarine belonging to the 885 Ash project is currently being completed. In addition, the second boat of the Kazan series, relating to the 885M project, is being completed. By the year 2020 in the Russian Navy will include eight such submarines. The construction of diesel-electric submarines of the 636, 877 and, possibly, 677 projects will also continue. The plans of the country's leadership for the construction of new equipment for the fleet look very, very bold. Their implementation is supported by appropriate investment of money. Thus, in the current state armament program for the period up to 2020, it is planned to allocate four trillion rubles for the construction of new equipment for the navy. For this money, it is planned to build about a hundred units of marine equipment, from strategic submarines to patrol boats.




As a result of all the transformations and upgrades of the Russian military fleet, the P-30 “Bulava” ballistic missile will become the main means of deterring sea bases in the future. Despite the specific statements of some persons far from the development and testing of this rocket, the military and the country's leadership have no complaints about it. S. Ivanov directly informed about this, and also expressed a quite obvious thesis about the inevitability of unsuccessful test launches. In addition, the head of the presidential administration recalled that the main rocket of the strategic submarines P-29RMU2 “Sineva” at the moment also had certain problems at the testing stage, but all of them were eventually overcome. So all the time spent on the development and testing of the “mace” is fully justified and this rocket is quite suitable for ensuring the security of the country.

Fleet renewal plans were confirmed by Russian President V. Putin. At the ceremony of awarding the Order of Nakhimov to the Peter the Great missile cruiser, he stressed the importance of developing the navy for the future of the country. According to him, in the future, Russian shipbuilders will only increase the pace of development and construction of new military equipment. One of the main executors of orders for the Navy will be the Sevmash plant in Severodvinsk. He has already built more 120 submarines only for the Soviet and Russian navy, and in the future will only continue to supply new submarines of various types.

Last Saturday, 12 in January, ITAR-TASS, citing a source in the Ministry of Defense, reported on further developments around the new submarines. In July and November of the current 2013, the fifth and sixth submarine of the Borey project will be laid on Sevmash. Allegedly, they will receive the names "Alexander Suvorov" and "Mikhail Kutuzov." It is noted that such names are still working. Thus, the new submarines of the 955A project will continue the established tradition of naming these submarines in honor of the great generals and statesmen of the past centuries.



On the materials of the sites:
http://ria.ru/
http://lenta.ru/
http://itar-tass.com/
http://rg.ru/
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    14 January 2013 07: 23
    7 feet under the keel.
    I am glad when our fleet gets real tools to deter "friendly" crap from impulses to make us live according to a foreign scenario.
    1. +1
      14 January 2013 08: 58
      Quote: Sakhalininets

      7 feet under the keel.

      And as much over the captain’s bridge wink
    2. avt
      +7
      14 January 2013 09: 41
      Quote: Sakhalininets
      7 feet under the keel.
      Well, no. LET THE NUMBER OF DIVES EQUAL THE NUMBER OF EXPLOSIONS as it will be calmer Yes
      1. Denzel13
        +9
        14 January 2013 13: 30
        How different are the wishes for different branches of the armed forces laughing

        Paratroopers before throwing are often spoken of as moral support. laughing : "Guardsmen, we'll land anyway!"
        1. avt
          0
          14 January 2013 16: 23
          Quote: Denzel13
          Before the drop, paratroopers are often told as moral support laughing: "Guardsmen, in any case, we will land!"
          And I also heard - "If the parachute did not open, so much the worse for the enemy !!" good laughing
    3. +2
      14 January 2013 18: 34
      yeah epic ... rockets will be loaded only at the end of the year, well and that cheers
  2. Bubo
    +5
    14 January 2013 07: 41
    Well then, good!
    The poor designer, it was evident from him, picked up the words carefully so as not to shake the superfluous. secret smile
    1. +4
      14 January 2013 09: 38
      Quote: Bubo
      a cautious designer, it was evident from him that he selected the words carefully so as not to shake the excess. secret
      We never talk too much. Of course, this is a joyful sign for Russia. But think about the problems of the surface fleet. Do we have many heavy and medium ships now?
      1. +2
        14 January 2013 10: 45
        And what type of fleet was the one that the USSR had for deploying missile carriers or a new universal one?
        The first is bad but good
        The second one is built with the creak of mk. Too big chain needs to be restored.
      2. 0
        14 January 2013 16: 56
        With surface sad. Until the 20 year will we master the promised 14 frigates? I hope that the 11356 series will continue to 9 units, otherwise we will remain without a fleet.
        By the way, are corvettes suitable for patrolling in the Mediterranean? Or only in the economic zone?
      3. +4
        14 January 2013 17: 57
        And for the surface fleet, first the piers and "service stations (just kidding)" need to be built, although ours, though through the path of the Soviet Navy, realized that without full-fledged bases, any aircraft carrier or AV would come at a loss to the country. Personally, I am in favor of our "palubniks" mastering not only air combat, but also striking the shore. We can't do without a multipurpose fleet!
    2. +3
      14 January 2013 15: 06
      It was necessary to blab the fake information. Let the Americans rack their brains and spend the military budget on countermeasures.
  3. +7
    14 January 2013 07: 58
    Welcome all! In my opinion, more Ash-trees need to be mortgaged - this is the support of both the SSBN and promising AUGs and just ship groups (as it is now in Syria). It turns out: for each Borey 2 - 3 Ash. The probability of using a multipurpose submarine for its intended purpose, I think, is higher than firing nuclear batons ...
    1. 0
      14 January 2013 20: 53
      I think over time, the submarines will become more unified. For it is expensive. I understand all sorts of "carrier agreements" and other polities, but I won't be surprised if Ash with 4 maces appears soon, in addition to the main CD and a floating craft for saboteurs ... Oh, dreams ... Dreams ...
      1. Misantrop
        +4
        14 January 2013 23: 30
        Quote: dmitreach
        I won't be surprised if Ash with 4 maces appears soon, in addition to the main CR and a floating craft for saboteurs ..

        Didn’t you have to meet a ceremonial limousine with a body for transporting manure and a sheaf binder? About the same combination laughing
        1. 0
          14 January 2013 23: 55
          What about the American experience?
          1. Misantrop
            +5
            15 January 2013 00: 40
            Quote: dmitreach
            American experience?

            And the usual logic? Hang the aircraft, even a very good one, with systems and devices for all occasions. Yes, maybe he can even fly with it. That's just all of these functions, it will perform equally badly. Just because on one useful element in performing any task it will have a bunch of useless (and even frankly harmful in this case). The submarine is not a Swiss knife, and even that is far from always convenient for serious work. So, dig deeper if the tool is not at hand ... wink

            IMHO it is no coincidence that this type of nuclear submarines among Americans appeared just when they began to save. Yes, and the United States (again IMHO) does not have a single (serial, experienced do not take) for the present combat Nuclear submarine. Their entire submarine fleet is ships peacetimeperfectly adapted not for war, but ... for demonstration of a threat .. Look through their directories. Until recently, there was a minimum buoyancy margin, a minimum number of compartments, working depths of the order of 100 m, the absence of ice reinforcements for the hull and wheelhouse, manual loading of TAs and the possibility of firing from them only at the minimum speed (from a fan-type apparatus it is impossible otherwise, it will break the torpedo with an oncoming stream ) Take their strategists, in their entire history, NO ONE fired more than two missiles at a time. Think - an accident? Or was there no money for rocket firing? By no means, everything is MUCH simpler - not one of them will sustain its own salvo winked
            1. Denzel13
              +2
              15 January 2013 11: 28
              Quote: Misantrop
              manual loading


              This is apparently their tradition adopted from the tank forces. laughing 100% and submarines loading torpedo tubes black laughing .
  4. +4
    14 January 2013 09: 10
    That's good, that's fine. Peter was a very intelligent emperor when he created the Fleet, it is a pity that the followers did not always correspond ...
  5. +2
    14 January 2013 09: 19
    News GOOD GOOD! But there is more and more! The arms race did not end for a minute!
    1. Indigo
      +2
      14 January 2013 16: 15
      Given the climatic conditions and locations of shipyards, it should be recognized that in addition to those. problems, the problem of cold, permafrost, labor, supplies, etc. - An important factor in the delay in the construction of ships.
      But WE (who believe in the revival of the Russian Empire) will overcome this, we can ..
  6. borisst64
    +1
    14 January 2013 09: 21
    Arriving at military events in a leather jacket is not accepted. I recall Minister of Defense Ivanov in white sneakers.
    1. Drappier
      0
      14 January 2013 10: 52
      Quote: borisst64

      Arriving at military events in a leather jacket is not accepted. I recall Minister of Defense Ivanov in white sneakers.

      And what should he be sorry in sables or something? wassat
      1. +8
        14 January 2013 12: 41
        Quote: Drapper
        And what should he be sorry in sables or something?


        For different cases, there is a different form of clothing. On the ship, raising the flag is a solemn occasion, and the entire staff is lined up in full dress, you see it yourself in the photo. A leather jacket or navy Canadian is not a dress uniform and is suitable only for everyday work wear.

        To put it mildly, in the fleet to go to the parade in a robe is considered a manifestation of disrespect for the crew. At least, during my service on ships, this tradition was still respected ...
        Well, let's assume that the parquet admirals in Moscow are simply “not in the know” of naval traditions and did not tell the minister about the “dress code” ...
        ... And he had to go out just like the crew - in the front coat.
        1. +3
          14 January 2013 16: 42
          Quote: vadimN
          At least, during my service on ships, this tradition was still respected ...

          I agree and it is a pity that these traditions are relegated to the category of "used to be". And it is a pity that the leaders consider it not obligatory for themselves to be the bearers of military traditions.
        2. 0
          14 January 2013 20: 57
          Marching would still learn. Traditions.
        3. -1
          16 January 2013 04: 13
          Quote: vadimN
          To put it mildly, in the fleet to go to the parade in a robe is considered a manifestation of disrespect for the crew.

          For your information:
          Full dress uniform of military personnel of the Ground Forces and Air Force High officers


          Army and Air Force Military Uniforms Top Officers


          With all this, we do not forget that this is not just raising the flag. This is the birthday of the ship as a combat unit.
          From the Ship Charter of the Navy:
          686. When the ship enters service, a solemn raising of the Navy flag is made.
          Navy flag is handed to the ship by the fleet commander or his admiral
          (an officer). A person arriving to present the Navy flag reads the entry order
          ship in the system and gives the commander of the ship a flag and an order.

          692. The annual holiday of the ship (compound) is held in order to educate military personnel in
          the spirit of devotion to the Fatherland, fidelity to military duty, military traditions and strengthening the military
          partnerships. Its date is set by the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy in
          commemoration of one of the memorable days in the history of the ship (compound):
          day of formation of the compound;
          the day the ship enters service (the first hoist of the Navy flag of the Russian Federation);
          day of awarding the order;
          day of assignment of the honorary name or the name "guard";
          days of a significant victory won by the ship (formation) in the battle for the defense of the Fatherland.
          Annual holidays are set for ships of 1, 2 and 3 rank and for compounds of ships of 4 rank.
    2. 0
      18 January 2013 15: 07
      The Minister of Defense is civilian. Those. he can wear a military uniform, like any citizen whom the state allowed to wear (the so-called resignation with the right to wear), if he had previously served. He has no naval uniform. Either in a jacket, or like that - in the Ministry of Emergency Situations everyday. Of course, this is savagery and disrespect for officers and sailors. But this is the order. I am for a return to how it was, the MO should be a military man and wear uniform. But this contradicts democratic principles (formally, a woman who does not know anything about the army at all can now hold the position of Moscow Region). Such a squiggle. (C) EBN
  7. +1
    14 January 2013 09: 37
    Not very good names .. "Rurik" and "Andrew the First-Called" are more suitable for the "princely" series .. There were such a cruiser and battleship in tsarist Russia, participated in wars .. Especially "Kutuzov" is in Novorossiysk, and "Suvorov" has not much to do with the fleet, although, of course, the names are worthy! In the Russian fleet there has never been a ship with the name "Ivan the Terrible" and most likely there will not be a ship in the Russian fleet either ... There is also Oleg, Askold ... also worthy names ..these names were carried by Russian warships, succession must be observed ..
    1. +1
      14 January 2013 11: 58
      But what was Rurik related to the fleet?)))
      Incidentally, the battleship Suvorov was in the Russian fleet, if we recall the ships with such names
      1. +2
        14 January 2013 12: 58
        Quote: Delta
        But what was Rurik related to the fleet?)))


        Rurik, before ascending to the Russian princely throne, led naval boats with a falcon on sails along the seas.
      2. 0
        15 January 2013 03: 40
        Quote: Delta
        But what was Rurik related to the fleet?)))

        Just two days ago, there was an article on the site about the incident in Fiume, so the armored cruiser of the Russian imperial fleet "Rurik" took part there, which in the fall of 1915 in the Baltic allowed the German cruiser "Roon" to take off in full. So the name "Rurik" in the names ships of the Russian fleet has a glorious history.
      3. +1
        15 January 2013 12: 48
        Quote: Delta
        Incidentally, the battleship Suvorov was in the Russian fleet, if we recall the ships with such names

        By the way, the trident on the Ukrainian ensign, this is the attacking falcon of Rurik.
      4. Dikremnij
        +1
        15 January 2013 21: 54
        Before coming to Kievan Rus, he operated in most of the Baltic Sea.
    2. +2
      14 January 2013 12: 57
      Quote: altman
      and "Suvorov" has little to do with the fleet, although, of course, the names are worthy

      Suvorov personally developed the entire fortification of the Sevastopol Bay in the interests of both the city itself and the Ushakov squadron.
      1. +1
        14 January 2013 13: 42
        Victor, good day, look at Rurik, take time, you will learn a lot of new things.
        1. Pessimist
          0
          14 January 2013 23: 31
          Good film.
      2. 0
        22 January 2013 16: 29
        I agree, but then .. "Prince Suvorov - Rymniksky" ... It seems he wrote correctly ..))) laughing
  8. +4
    14 January 2013 09: 40
    Missile carrier "Alexander Suvorov" will be laid down on Navy Day - a source

    Moscow, January 12 - AiF-Moscow. Construction of the strategic nuclear-powered submarine project 955A "Alexander Suvorov" will begin at Sevmash in Severodvinsk on July 28, Interfax reports, citing a source in the military-industrial complex. The start of work on the missile carrier is timed to coincide with the Day of the Russian Navy. It is assumed that the submarine with serial number 205 will bear the name of the great Russian commander, Prince Alexander Suvorov. However, an employee of the military-industrial complex noted that this is still a working title. The next missile carrier according to the plan will be laid down in November 2013 and will bear the name of the commander Mikhail Kutuzov. Two days ago, the lead strategic missile submarine Yuri Dolgoruky was officially admitted to the Russian Navy during a ceremony. Russian Defense Minister General Sergei Shoigu took part in the event. The ceremony took place at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk. The Ministry of Defense noted that the ship's acceptance certificate was signed on December 29, 2012. The nuclear submarine is 170 meters long, 13,5 meters wide, and has a total displacement of 24 tons. The cruiser carries on board 16 Bulava-30 missiles developed by the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering.

    http://www.newsfiber.com/p/s/h?v=E2pwQT9zVhjo%3D+YfYOjEV6Qak%3D
  9. CCA
    CCA
    +1
    14 January 2013 09: 57
    That's great ... good I would also like to note the symbolism of the names of the new cruisers - the famous commanders patriots and princes reformers ...
  10. +2
    14 January 2013 10: 29
    What does it mean that the rocket is in trial operation? That means she is "partially" adopted, what a pun? Does the fleet have a Bulava that can be put on alert?
    1. +1
      14 January 2013 11: 47
      Quote: unclevad

      What does it mean that the rocket is in trial operation? That means she is "partially" adopted, what a pun? Does the fleet have a Bulava that can be put on alert?

      There are papers! But in fact there are not enough successful launches.
    2. 0
      14 January 2013 13: 16
      There is a problem with the quantity. Production is just getting better and until it picks up the right pace, a certain amount of time will pass. According to rumors, by next year Dolgoruky will be fully armed and supplies for Nevsky will begin.
  11. Drappier
    0
    14 January 2013 10: 57
    Thank you for the article. This is fine, but unfortunately it’s somehow slow, this is understandable, it’s such a thing, it doesn’t tolerate fuss, but the "sworn friends" do not sleep, they build intrigues ...
  12. 0
    14 January 2013 11: 42
    Directly imagine how some overseas "friends" began to twitch the eyes. But the Sharks must be returned !!!! There are 3 pieces. Making a revolver loading with a mace !!!! And yet !!! ... And also !!! ... and also !!! ... Well, this is from the category of fantasy. We put a super computer and send it to the world's oceans for two years and let it lie on the ground, sometimes floating up to get data from the center !!! (well, this is from the category of fantasy))))) soldier
    1. +1
      14 January 2013 12: 55
      Quote: PROXOR
      We put a super computer and send it for two years to the oceans and let it lie on the ground sometimes floating up to receive data from the center!


      This is not such a fantasy ... In the old days (USSR), the question of building deep-sea autonomous (including fully automated) stations with missile weapons was considered. However, the topic was dropped. The main argument "against" is that such a station cannot remain undetected for a long time. In your version, this is the same podslya for a communication session - it immediately unmasks the location of the device.
      In my opinion, if we are to make such a "drone", then it is small, maneuverable and with a variable mode of movement - from a quiet low-noise "secret" move to a jerk at full speed. Armament - two or three cruise missiles in a cassette. Cheap and cheerful - a dozen of these all over the place, and the Yankees will be crazy to look for them ... This will definitely be inevitable retribution!
      1. 0
        14 January 2013 13: 51
        To our regret, in terms of a strategic enemy, China is approaching us, so in addition to the Navy, we urgently need to rearm the armed forces.
      2. Misantrop
        0
        14 January 2013 23: 34
        Quote: vadimN
        and the Yankees go crazy to look for them ...

        At first, theirs will go crazy to control them. There is no SUCH reliability to send a full automatic machine for long periods of time without fear of failures
  13. +1
    14 January 2013 12: 09
    The article mentioned that "the tests of the Severodvinsk multipurpose nuclear submarine belonging to the project 885 Ash" are currently being completed. " The information is somewhat unreliable. Doesn't finish.
  14. PistonizaToR
    -1
    14 January 2013 14: 57
    The main thing is that in practice it is the same as in words.
  15. Russian sniper
    +2
    14 January 2013 17: 32
    The main thing has already taken the first model of a submarine of this class. good That already says a lot. The first model is the most complex, you need to work on it all new systems and a young crew. hi I think that in the future our Navy will be replenished with ships of this class and as soon as possible.
    1. 0
      14 January 2013 23: 23
      + 1!
      Only not the first one, but the head one and not the ships, but the ships ...
  16. +1
    14 January 2013 19: 42
    Where all the trolls hid, the borea with a mace got scared.
  17. biglow
    +2
    14 January 2013 20: 13
    finally, the Minister of Defense began to walk in uniform, he hopes that there will be no more office workers as Minister
    1. 0
      14 January 2013 21: 07
      In the United States, by law, only civilian
      And nothing, somehow they live, the strongest army in the world
      1. biglow
        +5
        14 January 2013 22: 24
        SWEET_SIXTEEN,
        fortunately, we are not in the United States, and we do not care about them, they have been allowed in the army and fagots
      2. Misantrop
        +5
        14 January 2013 23: 36
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN

        In the United States, by law, only civilian
        Under the same law, their Minister of War is no more than a bureaucrat. And not at all a FULL LEADER, as we have
      3. +2
        15 January 2013 03: 44
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        In the United States, by law, only civilian

        Yes, even if a Negro 3.14door on one leg. I mean that from the one who has their minister. The main thing is who we have!
  18. +1
    14 January 2013 20: 43
    This is really very good news!
  19. DAEDALUS
    0
    14 January 2013 21: 50
    Quote: Sakhalininets
    7 ft. Keel

    I join in the congratulations! wink
  20. xopek b kacke
    0
    15 January 2013 01: 16
    Well, aliluya!
    Let's hope that the boat is not morally obsolete (after all, it was laid down in 1996), and the remaining ships of the 955A series will have more differences than just 20 missiles versus 16.
    In any case, seven feet under the keel!
  21. 0
    15 January 2013 03: 45
    After reading the article, I just want to shout - ANYTHING, BROTHERS, ANYTHING !!!!
  22. Stalinets
    0
    15 January 2013 04: 20
    Seven feet under the keel, as they say !!!
  23. 13017
    0
    15 January 2013 13: 56
    why do not they say anything for the repair of Atlantes, they are waiting
  24. SA23WSGFG
    -1
    15 January 2013 19: 22
    Have you heard the news? The Russian authorities are already insolent in the end. They made this database
    http://guardlink.org/4wQyl1
    where you can find information about any resident of the Baltic countries.
    really was very surprised
    there are a lot of interesting things about me (addresses, phone numbers, even my photos are different
    character) - I wonder where they dug up this. In general, there are good sides - this
    Information can be deleted from the site.
    I advise you to hurry, you never know how to fumble there ...

    Have you heard the news? The Russian authorities are already insolent in the end. They made this database
    http://guardlink.org/4wQyl1
    where you can find information about any resident of the Baltic countries.
    really was very surprised
    there are a lot of interesting things about me (addresses, phone numbers, even my photos are different
    character) - I wonder where they dug up this. In general, there are good sides - this
    Information can be deleted from the site.
    I advise you to hurry, you never know how to fumble there ...