Military Review

British expert: Russia’s use of attack helicopters showed the vulnerability of Western military equipment of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

21
British expert: Russia’s use of attack helicopters showed the vulnerability of Western military equipment of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

One of the main obstacles to a successful counter-offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was the active use of attack helicopters by the Russian Armed Forces on the battlefield. This position is shared by British military expert Philip Ingram in an interview with Sky News.


The analyst listed the reasons for the failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive as a lack of military air defense equipment, engineering mine clearance vehicles, and the superiority of the Russian Armed Forces in the air, including the presence of attack helicopters.

Russia's use of attack helicopters and well-planned fortifications exposed the vulnerability of Western armored vehicles and prevented the Ukrainian Armed Forces from making significant progress.

- says a British military expert.

According to Ingram, due to the listed factors, the Ukrainian Armed Forces were unable to break through the Russian defense line. As a result, the counter-offensive of Ukrainian troops was ineffective. Over the course of five months, the Ukrainian Armed Forces failed to achieve any impressive successes in any of the areas of its counteroffensive. But the Ukrainian army lost tens of thousands of trained military personnel and a significant part of the military equipment transferred by NATO countries.

Naturally, the West is now trying to look for the reasons for the failure of the counteroffensive. Among them were the fortress of the Russian defense line, a large number of mines, and even tall grass and dense bushes. The most adequate experts believe that the West and Ukraine simply overestimated the capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and Western military equipment and underestimated the strength of the Russian army.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ZovSailor
    ZovSailor 1 November 2023 16: 29
    0
    Opinions of pseudo-Western and other experts about tactics and
    NATO's strategy, as the only real force in the world, has already
    has been around since the 1950s, and after failures and escape
    Yankees and all the nata from Vietnam, Afghanistan, when
    fighters in slippers on bare feet drive away herds
    deeply echeloned and armed
    modern weapons so-called. warriors, showed the whole world the real
    the value of the statements of such experts.
    1. BorzRio
      BorzRio 1 November 2023 21: 10
      -1
      To be fair, the USSR also did not leave Afghanistan with a victory, and the losses were much higher than the American ones and the entire West. And the United States left Afghanistan for one reason - they had already squeezed out everything that could be squeezed out of the resources of this territory. Further there was no prospect and it was not profitable to be located there. The departure really turned out to be ill-considered and shameful.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 1 November 2023 16: 39
    +4
    Russia's use of attack helicopters and well-planned fortifications exposed the vulnerability of Western armored vehicles and prevented the Ukrainian Armed Forces from making significant progress.


    This was proven by the United States itself at the time of the appearance of CobraTou........but there was additional support for Shilka tanks. There's even a calculation of the loss ratio. And for the Whirlwind or Kornet (heavy) ATGMs, it doesn’t matter what kind of armored object... even a battleship turret.
  4. Stas1973
    Stas1973 1 November 2023 16: 48
    +4
    Funny. Such experts. Just great.
    Without air supremacy on the battlefield, any offensive action is doomed to failure. What is there to invent here?
    1. Aag
      Aag 1 November 2023 17: 58
      +3
      Quote: Stas1973
      Funny. Such experts. Just great.
      Without air supremacy on the battlefield, any offensive action is doomed to failure. What is there to invent here?

      Sorry, and - to whom do you “give” air supremacy? And - on what basis?
      I can’t know for sure, but based on all the ensuing events, I assume that we (the Russian Armed Forces) have not yet been able to achieve overwhelming air supremacy!
      Try to refute.... (((
      Yes! I am specifically against fascism! I will not forget the May “House of Trade Unions” in Odessa... I will not forgive you! But! I also remember the exchange of “Azov”, Tyra, Medvedchuk!! Maybe we should realize this first?!
      Those who want to minus, please first indicate your position. Preferably, with reasoning...
      Thank you. hi
      1. Sergei Lyakhovsky
        Sergei Lyakhovsky 2 November 2023 00: 46
        +1
        I agree, Tyra is still a nit.
      2. Sergei N 58912062
        Sergei N 58912062 2 November 2023 04: 45
        +1
        Of course, we do not have 100% air supremacy. But it is impossible to achieve it 100%. But the fact that we have air superiority is a fact.
    2. NAF-NAF
      NAF-NAF 1 November 2023 18: 46
      0
      Please comment then on the offensive actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces last September? Maybe they had air supremacy there?? Or, as it is now fashionable to say, “this is something else”?
      1. Aag
        Aag 1 November 2023 19: 55
        0
        Quote: NAF-NAF
        Please comment then on the offensive actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces last September? Maybe they had air supremacy there?? Or, as it is now fashionable to say, “this is something else”?

        Well, - it was still not enough, - after the cheerful messages, - Reports (of the official speaker of the RF Ministry of Defense, with a promotion in military rank, - so, - for a minute...
        I understand, - “He is just a cog in the system...” / all quotes, spaces, dots, - according to the Russian language, - to become infected... Yes, and many will not understand... /. hi
        On the merits of the question:
        - The Ukrainian Armed Forces (I don’t know for sure) created a bridgehead on the left bank of the Don in the Kherson direction?...
        - In Sevastopol, did they really sound the air raid alert twice today?...
        - Was the Crimean Bridge really blocked today?...
        - Have you flown into Donetsk more than 80 times today? (more than a year and a half after the “desire” of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, including, to protect the citizens of the Russian Federation?)... / IMHO: citizens of Kursk, Belgorod, Bryansk, and a number of other regions, became hostages of the situation ... /
        What am I wrong?
        A commensurate fee? - for what?!
        For the "Azavians", Medvedchuk's yacht, for another project of another oligarch...from the Russian Federation?!!! /...
        ...Kick... Those who no longer value their children, those who have already had them taken away (mentally, or physically...)...
        Sorry colleagues, I don’t see a single ray of light at the “end of the tunnel”...
        I understand, it's not popular...
        I will be sincerely glad to any reasoned, life-affirming answer...
        Thank you. hi
  5. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 1 November 2023 16: 52
    +2
    even tall grass and dense bushes
    Soon there will be another cold winter.
  6. faterdom
    faterdom 1 November 2023 16: 54
    0
    What will this expert say when he sees Sarmat’s work with the Avaguards?
    Feeling a little vulnerable?
    1. Yura
      Yura 1 November 2023 20: 04
      0
      Quote: faterdom
      What will this expert say when he sees Sarmat’s work with the Avaguards?
      Feeling a little vulnerable?
      He won’t say or feel anything, because he won’t have time since these missiles are specifically for them, that is, the USA, Britain and some others who are far from Russia, but who have the audacity to open their mouths against it.
      1. Aag
        Aag 1 November 2023 23: 08
        +1
        Quote: Jura
        Quote: faterdom
        What will this expert say when he sees Sarmat’s work with the Avaguards?
        Feeling a little vulnerable?
        He won’t say or feel anything, because he won’t have time since these missiles are specifically for them, that is, the USA, Britain and some others who are far from Russia, but who have the audacity to open their mouths against it.

        Sorry, of course... But your “grammaticality” or “penmanship” (as far as this is applicable to the Internet) does not allow us to understand the meaning of your message.
        I make mistakes, typos (my vision is no longer the same, the fonts are small...).
        But! Comrade Yura (Mr.)!
        Let's try to respect other "interlocutors" with similar problems? drinks
        Essentially the comment:
        Where does such confidence in the Strategic Missile Forces come from? (You’re writing about them, right?)... I’m thinking:
        A) You served in the Strategic Missile Forces for a very long time;
        Q) You didn’t serve at all, but watched TVK “Zvezda”...
        Didn't mean to offend... Really!
        It’s just very bitter and insulting: I thought, well, really (they were young, bad), well, they are withdrawing troops from the GSVG (so they are also dragging “Hotels”, “Audi”, “Volkswagens” with “Giyundiks”), - after all True, there was such a thing! Not accessible to everyone...). And we, in Siberia, fight with homeless people for the right to unload wagons after a shift from the database, or for cabbage, carrots with riot police in the “Chinese” fields...
        If there are comrades here of the 29th RD Strategic Missile Forces (Irkutsk) of the 90s, they won’t let you lie!
        And some will also reproach (justifiably), “Yes, you were actually in a fairy tale”!!). /Uzhur, Yasnaya, ... etc.... Hello! Brothers!! /...
        Sorry, I got distracted, emotions, I was wrong...
        "The army is the blood of the flesh of our people..."
        We look at the people... Who hasn't seen the current army. Are we surprised? Why suddenly?! The officers are already those for whom Sponge-Bob in childhood replaced Yuri Senkevich, Harry Potter - Nikolai Drozdov! Buzov, - Vysotsky!
        ...Maybe I’m exaggerating somewhere, but I’ve met brighter characters...
        And, yes... I live in... not far from...
        In short... There is something to compare: the Soviet, early Russian Strategic Missile Forces with the current ones.
        In terms of equipment and achievements, there are definitely! In the level of preparation - I don’t know... It seems that they are drilling them hard... I just doubt the success of these events - from school, family, it would be necessary...
        Yes, bl.. In, they can’t (or don’t want to) park their cars properly...)))
        1. Yura
          Yura 2 November 2023 01: 08
          +2
          There was a specific question, there was a specific answer to it, everything was transparent and clear without any subtext. You have a long post, a lot of painful things, but these are not only your thoughts, but many of mine too. Only we ourselves can look for answers and find them, no one can convince you or me of anything, we ourselves must find answers to our questions. A correctly posed question is the path to finding the answer. Almost everything you wrote about is also very close to my heart, but this is a long conversation and not for this or any other platform. The time is different now, this is the time of our children and grandchildren, hence the thought - everything that we see now and will see again is done by them, whether we like it or not.
          1. Aag
            Aag 3 November 2023 14: 52
            +1
            Thanks for the reply.
            I noticed it too late - the bell doesn't work.
            hi
  7. KCA
    KCA 1 November 2023 17: 00
    +3
    If helicopters were designed to destroy military equipment, is it surprising that they are vulnerable?
  8. Roma 1977
    Roma 1977 1 November 2023 18: 16
    -2
    What a news. The potential of helicopters in the fight against armored vehicles was appreciated back in the days of Khrushchev. And since then, helicopters have become even more deadly and invulnerable to return fire.
  9. Yaroslav Tekkel
    Yaroslav Tekkel 1 November 2023 21: 12
    0
    Yes, this is simply a brilliant discovery by British scientists. It turns out that enemy combat helicopters are hindering the advance. Now Sir only has to make a very small intellectual effort to understand why the airfields with these helicopters were so colorfully ATTACKED after the counterattack, and not before.
  10. Yaroslav Tekkel
    Yaroslav Tekkel 1 November 2023 21: 44
    -1
    Yes, this is simply a brilliant discovery by British scientists. It turns out that enemy combat helicopters are hindering the advance. Now Sir only has to make a very small intellectual effort to understand why the airfields with these helicopters were so colorfully ATTACKED after the counterattack, and not before.
  11. Carlos Hall
    Carlos Hall 1 November 2023 23: 29
    -2
    Ka 52 Alligator and to a lesser extent Mi 25 and Mi 35 destroyed Ukrainian armored vehicles
    1. Sergei N 58912062
      Sergei N 58912062 2 November 2023 04: 51
      0
      What about minefields? And the ATGM? What about artillery? What about the Lancets?