The Ukrainian Armed Forces fired at a settlement in the Bryansk region from a tank this night

16
The Ukrainian Armed Forces fired at a settlement in the Bryansk region from a tank this night

Another Russian settlement has come under Ukrainian shelling. This time the Ukrainian Armed Forces opened fire from tank in the village of Sluchevsk in the Bryansk region of Russia.

The village of Sluchevsk is located a kilometer from the Russian-Ukrainian border, which makes it a very vulnerable place to shelling from the Ukrainian side. Tonight, a Ukrainian formation opened fire from a tank on the territory of a populated area. Local authorities report at least two shots fired with 125mm shells.



Fortunately, this time there were no casualties or destruction. However, it should be noted that the territory of the border regions of the Russian Federation is regularly subjected to shelling from the Ukrainian side. Most often, Ukrainian formations shell the Belgorod and Bryansk regions, less often the Kursk region.

Typically, fire is carried out from mortars and artillery pieces, sometimes multiple launch rocket systems are used for shelling, attack unmanned aerial vehicles are also launched, and sabotage and reconnaissance groups are sent to Russian territory.

In addition, yesterday another Russian village, Novaya Tavolzhanka in the Belgorod region, was shelled from an Ukrainian Armed Forces tank. This settlement was also shelled from a Ukrainian tank. By luck, there were no casualties in Novaya Tavolzhanka. In addition, yesterday, according to Belgorod Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov, in the Grayvoronsky urban district, two explosive devices were dropped from a UAV on the outskirts of the village of Novostroevka-Vtoraya, but there were no consequences.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    16 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      31 October 2023 08: 49
      The firing range from a tank is 5...7 km - can’t the border guards detect it, send a lancet or K-52 there?
      1. +2
        31 October 2023 11: 09
        Quote from: Peter1First
        The firing range from a tank is 5...7 km - can’t the border guards detect it, send a lancet or K-52 there?

        The border guards do not have lancets, much less Ka-52s.
        1. +2
          31 October 2023 12: 43
          The border guards do not have lancets, much less Ka-52s.

          But they have their own special forces. 5-7 km is not a hindrance for special forces, put the tank on RPG rollers and catch the crew and hang them on poles.
          1. 0
            31 October 2023 19: 35
            Quote: private person
            But they have their own special forces. 5-7 km is not a hindrance for special forces, put the tank on RPG rollers and catch the crew and hang them on poles.

            It was before that Soviet border guards were trained for such feats. Today, such messages are simply statistics.
      2. 0
        31 October 2023 15: 10
        Quote from: Peter1First
        The firing range from a tank is 5...7 km - can’t the border guards detect it, send a lancet or K-52 there?

        The distance from the eyes, reading information from the monitor, to the brain is generally insignificant, so is it really possible that your brain cannot comprehend simple things. That border guards do not stand every 10-15 meters on the border, that each border guard does not have a reconnaissance drone from which they could detect what is happening in the border zone of a neighboring state. And even more so send the Lancet there; I’m generally silent about the K-52. There are no such means in the RF Armed Forces, much less among the border guards. and the border guards are somehow not very good with the Ka-52.
    2. +1
      31 October 2023 08: 55
      Why wasn't the tank destroyed? They sent a dozen UAVs for a nit
    3. -1
      31 October 2023 08: 55
      Why wasn't the tank destroyed? They sent a dozen UAVs for a nit
    4. +1
      31 October 2023 09: 05
      Apparently not enough arrived yesterday in the Sumy region, it is necessary to add doubly so.
    5. 0
      31 October 2023 09: 27
      how is that possible?.. is it really impossible for the border guards to coordinate a couple of copters with helicopters for reconnaissance and several fpv or with drops at least?.. for starters, at least in dangerous/frequently shelled areas
    6. +2
      31 October 2023 09: 31
      What was it? Unfriendly act? A vile provocation? And this was one of the episodes of the real war that Ukraine is waging against us, showing that they can fire at our territory almost without hindrance.
      1. 0
        31 October 2023 09: 48
        this is all happening and will continue to happen as long as the government “chews snot”
      2. -1
        31 October 2023 11: 08
        Quote: Dimy4
        What was it? Unfriendly act? A vile provocation? And this was one of the episodes of the real war that Ukraine is waging against us, showing that they can fire at our territory almost without hindrance.

        The territory of Ukraine is now being shelled much more often.
    7. +1
      31 October 2023 10: 14
      again twenty-five...well...well, I'm tired of this.....when will our wise command get smart....well, it was invented a long time ago...tethered balloon and tracking equipment 50 miles in full view for days and months. for years.....there is simply not enough evil
      1. 0
        31 October 2023 11: 07
        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
        again twenty-five...well...well, I'm tired of this.....when will our wise command get smart....well, it was invented a long time ago...tethered balloon and tracking equipment 50 miles in full view for days and months. for years.....there is simply not enough evil

        This tethered balloon, along with all its equipment, will be shot down in half an hour after it is raised. And some equipment can be seen at 50 km, oh, how expensive.
    8. +4
      31 October 2023 11: 43
      Well, what kind of border with the enemy can there be during a war with him?
      This is some kind of schizophrenia, in the spirit of reduced taxation when hiring migrants.
      Who is our “leadership” playing for?
      1. -1
        31 October 2023 22: 01
        Quote: kakvastam
        Well, what kind of border with the enemy can there be during a war with him?
        This is some kind of schizophrenia, in the spirit of reduced taxation when hiring migrants.
        Who is our “leadership” playing for?

        So there is no war. SVO. This time.
        2) A very interesting situation has developed at the border, when neither we nor the enemy want to cross it. Ukraine does not seem to have a goal to chop off territories outside the limits of the 2002 agreement, and the West (for now) does not allow the use of its heavy weapons in the “old” regions of the Russian Federation, which greatly reduces the combat effectiveness of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in this area. On the other hand, the Russian command is also in no hurry to attack Kharkov and Sumy, very reasonably assuming that in wooded areas its tank columns will be very vulnerable, and there is simply no extra force to open a new front. This is where the sluggish skirmishes between the parties and raids by the DRG come from.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"