Military Review

The X-2023 supersonic aircraft is among the best inventions of 59 according to Time magazine.

51
The X-2023 supersonic aircraft is among the best inventions of 59 according to Time magazine.

In the vehicle category, the X-2023 supersonic aircraft, created jointly by Lockheed Martin and NASA, was among the best inventions of 59 according to Time magazine. The editors of the publication have been creating this list of ideas and products every year for more than two decades.


When selecting nominees, originality, efficiency, ambition and other factors are taken into account. They are the reason for the inclusion of the X-59 because it could change the future of commercial flights over land. Now, thanks to the solution to the problem of sonic boom suppression, it has become possible to use supersonic aircraft for these purposes.

The aircraft will be the centerpiece of NASA's QueSST experimental mission, which will fly over communities across the United States. At the same time, the reaction of residents to the acceptability of the volume of the sonic boom during the flight of the device will be monitored. As a result, NASA expects to achieve the lifting of the ban on flights of civil supersonic aircraft over land.

This will open up new markets for aircraft manufacturers, and allow passengers to halve the time spent on flights.

It is expected that the noise emitted by the X-59 will not exceed 70-75 decibels. This is a great achievement, because the engine noise of a regular passenger airliner reaches 140 dB, and on a highway the noise level can be about 100 dB.

Photos used:
Lockheed Martin
51 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Orange Bigg
    Orange Bigg 30 October 2023 17: 47
    +2


    Russian scientists have prepared a technical proposal for a demonstrator of the promising supersonic civil aircraft (SCA) "Strizh". Director General of the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) Kirill Sypalo spoke about this in an interview with RIA Novosti.
    I hope that all these movements have grown into a practical plane, and did not remain in words. Although, to be honest, it’s hard to believe. There is now enough work of the UEC besides this project.
    “The creation of a new generation of supersonic civil aircraft is one of the main challenges for modern aviation science around the world and one of the promising high-tech areas in which Russia has a real chance to become a world leader,” said Sypalo. Currently, TsAGI specialists have determined the parameters and appearance engine for a supersonic aircraft. According to Sypalo, in the new power plant, the required level of thrust will be provided with a relatively low specific fuel consumption. By 2024, Russian engineers plan to develop a gas generator for the SGS - the main element of a new aircraft engine capable of supersonic cruising flight. General designer of the United Engine Corporation (UEC) Yuri Shmotin spoke about such plans last September.

    https://russian.rt.com/russia/article/745842-sverhzvuk-samolyot-cagi-strizh

    And a year later, the General Director of TsAGI announced that a technical proposal had been formed in Russia for the project of a promising supersonic civil 6-seater aircraft (SGS) “Strizh”. The full-size length of the aircraft will be 38 meters, the ship will accommodate 8 people: 2 pilots and 6 passengers. The Swift should reach a speed of Mach 1,8, which approximately equals 1,9-2,2 thousand km. Today, the Swift is not the only type of GHS that Russian aviation enterprises are working on. For example, Tupolev PJSC, together with other leading domestic organizations, is developing a GHS for 30 passenger seats.
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 30 October 2023 17: 53
      +10
      I remember that someone was going to make a passenger one out of TU 160.
      1. Orange Bigg
        Orange Bigg 30 October 2023 18: 01
        +11
        Quote: Aerodrome
        I remember that someone was going to make a passenger one out of TU 160.


        Passengers using drums instead of cruise missiles? Prone flight. One might say that it is in comfort class.
        1. dimy44
          dimy44 30 October 2023 18: 43
          +3
          Why I like to read comments from site users, for humor and comments that are not straight-forward.
        2. Bolt cutter
          Bolt cutter 30 October 2023 19: 24
          +5
          Passengers using drums instead of cruise missiles? Prone flight
          You're welcome, but the British Mosquito was used to transport VIPs during the war. Sleeping bag - and in the bomb bay.
          1. Aviator_
            Aviator_ 30 October 2023 21: 55
            +2
            and the British Mosquito was used in approximately the same way to transport VIPs during the war.
            Well, Molotov flew the Pe-8 to negotiations in England in 1941, although not in the bomb bay.
        3. dmi.pris1
          dmi.pris1 30 October 2023 19: 37
          +9
          Yes, as if in another, more developed civilization, they made the Tu16 from the Tu104..
        4. Popandos
          Popandos 30 October 2023 22: 08
          +2
          Flight while lying down.

          And dismounting, straight home on an individual basis, this is not some kind of VIP for you, it’s cooler, and the suitcase from the baggage will immediately be fired from a revolver suspension.
      2. vovochkarzhevsky
        vovochkarzhevsky 30 October 2023 18: 24
        0
        This is a consequence of falling in love and not implementing another project. There was a proposal to make the Tu-144 a strategic cargo aircraft. Take away all the amenities from the cabin and leave only the folding seats. We have a large country and sometimes there is an emergency need to transfer some cargo and specialists from one end to the other. But alas, the collapse of the USSR put an end to this.
        1. Aviator_
          Aviator_ 30 October 2023 22: 00
          +5
          There was a proposal to make the Tu-144 a strategic cargo aircraft.
          This did not happen, there was no customer. The car itself was very expensive to maintain; Aeroflot happily abandoned it after a short period of use on the Moscow-Almaty highway. But I couldn’t fly to Khabarovsk with a full load - over Siberia at altitudes of 15000-18000 m, areas of 100-150 km with elevated temperatures relative to other areas were discovered, which led to a drop in engine thrust. These are the so-called "temperature lenses" that contributed to the termination of our project.
          1. vovochkarzhevsky
            vovochkarzhevsky 31 October 2023 11: 40
            +1
            This did not happen, there was no customer. The car itself was very expensive to maintain; Aeroflot happily abandoned it after a short period of use on the Moscow-Almaty highway. But I couldn’t fly to Khabarovsk with a full load - over Siberia at altitudes of 15000-18000 m, areas of 100-150 km with elevated temperatures relative to other areas were discovered, which led to a drop in engine thrust. These are the so-called "temperature lenses" that contributed to the termination of our project.


            That's why I say it's a proposal. After all, things didn’t go further than talk. Although there is such a need now, when the urgency is higher than the cost of transportation.
        2. bayard
          bayard 31 October 2023 08: 59
          +4
          Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
          There was a proposal to make the Tu-144 a strategic cargo aircraft.

          They did not create normal engines for the Tu-144 with acceptable efficiency and reliability. The entire fleet of built Tu-144s was put on hold to wait for the NK-32, on which great hopes were pinned. But all the NK-32s produced went to the Tu-160, and even for the next modification of the Tu-22M4 there were not enough of them. One side of the Tu-144 was still equipped with the NK-32, but they did not have time to conduct full tests - the Union collapsed. This Tu-144 with NK-32 was leased by the United States, tested for several years and used as a flying laboratory for NASA, then it seemed to be returned. It never became clear whether the NK-32 on the Tu-144 was justified.
          In fact, the Tu-144 was supposed to make flights to Khabarovsk and Vladivostok, but it had enough range (guaranteed) only to Alma-Ata. And it was actually used as a postal service for some time, both to Khabarovsk, and it seems that it even flew to Vladivostok, but with an underload. And even then it seemed like it was a modification with non-afterburning engines created specifically for it...
          In short, they didn’t finish it.
          Perhaps the secret of the failure was also that, competing with the Concorde, they tried to surpass it in everything - maximum speed, altitude and... number of passengers. For this purpose, they installed one more row of passenger seats - not two seats on each side, but two on one side, and three passenger seats on the other. Well, the fuselage had to be expanded for this. But the engines didn’t work. And the fuel supply turned out to be insufficient. In short, Tupolev’s son got carried away with competitions and lost his balance. And it was a beautiful plane.
          1. vovochkarzhevsky
            vovochkarzhevsky 31 October 2023 11: 44
            +1
            They did not create normal engines for the Tu-144 with acceptable efficiency and reliability. The entire fleet of built Tu-144s was put on hold to wait for the NK-32, on which great hopes were pinned. But all the NK-32s produced went to the Tu-160, and even for the next modification of the Tu-22M4 there were not enough of them. One side of the Tu-144 was still equipped with the NK-32, but they did not have time to conduct full tests - the Union collapsed. This Tu-144 with NK-32 was leased by the United States, tested for several years and used as a flying laboratory for NASA, then it seemed to be returned. It never became clear whether the NK-32 on the Tu-144 was justified.
            In fact, the Tu-144 was supposed to make flights to Khabarovsk and Vladivostok, but it had enough range (guaranteed) only to Alma-Ata.


            So I was talking not about the passenger version, but the cargo version. This made it possible to lighten the interior and increase fuel reserves. But such an aircraft was not needed in a maximum of five copies.
            The USSR could afford it, but not the Russian Federation.
      3. Oleg Apushkin
        Oleg Apushkin 31 October 2023 14: 07
        -1
        The Europeans really wanted this, thank the creator, this idea did not come to life.
    2. credo
      credo 30 October 2023 17: 59
      +2
      The concept is certainly nice, but I would like to see a passenger plane in real size, unless the creators designed it only for a couple of passengers sitting behind the pilot. wink
    3. mmaxx
      mmaxx 30 October 2023 18: 13
      -6
      The question is that the Americans have quite a lot of money invested in this. And we have ideas.
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 30 October 2023 18: 22
        +8
        The question is - why is it needed? They stopped making the previous ones not because of the sonic boom. Either our carcass or a concord. They are expensive and unprofitable. Why create more versions? sad
        1. ALCA056000
          ALCA056000 30 October 2023 19: 16
          +2
          What for? And to make a bunch of money, to brag to the whole world (the patriots cannot be overcome, there is no protection from javelins, the arams cannot be knocked out, we are the most .... well, etc.). What kind of objectivity can there be “according to Time magazine”?
        2. Rome
          Rome 30 October 2023 19: 40
          +3
          Their unprofitability, in particular that of the Concorde, arose due to the speed limit; they could only accelerate over the ocean, so the gain in time was not so large compared to a subsonic liner, in contrast to ticket prices tongue and they could only fly over the Atlantic, since on other routes they generally lost all advantages in speed, since they could only fly over continents at subsonic speeds stop
          if it is possible to fly from London to the Emirates 2 times faster, then they will pay extra (business class costs several times more than regular tickets and people pay!), and at distances of 8000 km +, then ordinary people will pay extra, flying for half a day is tough. And supersonic business jets also have good prospects; most likely, supersonic passenger aircraft will even begin with them. bully
        3. bayard
          bayard 1 November 2023 00: 14
          0
          Quote: igorbrsv
          The question is - why is it needed? They stopped making the previous ones not because of the sonic boom. Either our carcass or a concord. They are expensive and unprofitable. Why create more versions?

          Actually, now we are talking about business jets, and not about full-fledged passenger airliners. A business jet values ​​comfort, reliability, aesthetics and speed. Because for wealthy people, time is worth much more than kerosene. Engines appeared with much greater specific power, capable of supporting supersonic flight in non-afterburning mode. The desire to get such a business jet has long been expressed by oil sheikhs and simply rich people. They turned to Putin when they still believed in the capabilities of our aviation industry. Now certain studies and experiments have begun again. The non-afterburning modification R-579V-300 is now offered as an engine. But now there is no talk of full-fledged passenger supersonics - only business jets for 6 - 24 passengers.
    4. Rumata
      Rumata 30 October 2023 18: 16
      +1
      Quote from Orange Bigg
      I hope that all these movements have grown into a practical plane, and did not remain in words.

      At the current level of technological development, it is realistic to rivet only a small business jet. Flying it will cost a lot of money. Mass passenger transportation does not look like this in the foreseeable future.
      1. bayard
        bayard 1 November 2023 00: 31
        0
        Quote: Rumata
        At the current level of technological development, it is realistic to rivet only a small business jet.

        At the current level of technology, it is quite possible to make a quite decent passenger supersonic - more high-torque and economical engines allow this. The question is expediency. When airlines, when choosing their airliners, consider every gram of specific fuel consumption, what kind of supersonics can we talk about? The experience of Concorde and Tu-144 is memorable and descriptive. But business jets are not just in demand - potential customers have been looking for a developer and supplier of such aircraft for 10+ years. And in the end, work on such business jets began. But no one is chasing record speeds anymore; they’ve already played enough with thermal deformations. Most often the speeds stated are 1700 - 1900 km/h.
  2. Amateur
    Amateur 30 October 2023 17: 49
    0
    For now there is only advertising. And the plane itself has never taken off, let alone reached supersonic speed and at the same time avoided a sonic boom when crossing the sound barrier.
    1. Aviator_
      Aviator_ 30 October 2023 18: 00
      +11
      and at the same time avoid a sonic boom when crossing the sound barrier.
      Victor, you have the wrong idea about a sonic boom. At supersonic speed, a shock wave in the form of a cone always forms around the product, which it drags along with it everywhere until it reduces the speed to subsonic. And everything would be fine, but with certain temperature gradients in the atmosphere it is possible to focus this shock wave on the surface, this leads to broken windows, etc. Therefore, interest arose in a new generation supersonic aircraft, in which shock waves going down will be minimized.
      1. igorbrsv
        igorbrsv 30 October 2023 18: 24
        0
        But they abandoned civilian supersonic technology not because of the shock wave
        1. Aviator_
          Aviator_ 30 October 2023 18: 48
          +1
          But they abandoned civilian supersonic technology not because of the shock wave
          The first generation aircraft (Tu-144, Concorde) were terribly unprofitable both for us and for them. However, cases of focusing sometimes happened.
      2. Amateur
        Amateur 30 October 2023 18: 55
        +1
        Totally agree with you. Only the plane has never flown, and how it will do it is still known only from mathematical models. And he’s already in 1st place. That's why I wrote that for now there is only advertising. drinks
        1. Aviator_
          Aviator_ 30 October 2023 20: 14
          +1
          Of course, this is PR, nothing more. It’s even somewhat surprising to me why this direction suddenly began to be developed. drinks
    2. alexoff
      alexoff 30 October 2023 18: 21
      +2
      Well, they've advertised in the Times, you can start making pre-orders
  3. Rumata
    Rumata 30 October 2023 17: 52
    0
    What kind of advances?))) Maybe it will fly, maybe not.
    Oct 17 2023 - The space agency NASA postponed the first flight of the experimental supersonic aircraft X-59 to 2024, from
    1. sedoj
      sedoj 30 October 2023 18: 01
      +4
      Quote: Rumata
      What kind of advances?

      First time, or what? Obama also grabbed the peace prize in advance.
      1. Orange Bigg
        Orange Bigg 30 October 2023 18: 12
        +3
        Americans now have everything in debt.
  4. Vladimir80
    Vladimir80 30 October 2023 17: 54
    -1
    Another advertisement for the “technical achievements of mankind.”
    the noise emitted by the X-59 will not exceed 70-75 decibels. This is a great achievement, because the engine noise of a typical passenger airliner reaches 140 dB

    140db is next to an airplane, but what is the noise level from it when the airplane is in the sky and a person is on the ground?
    P.S. It looks more like moneybags want to rewrite the rules so that they can fly around the world on their personal planes 2 times faster... But ordinary people can tolerate it...
    1. mmaxx
      mmaxx 30 October 2023 18: 15
      0
      This is true . If you like to ride, have 100 rubles (c). A ticket to Concorde also cost terrible money. Here they promise a smaller proportion.
    2. Frettaskyrandi
      Frettaskyrandi 30 October 2023 18: 53
      +3
      140db is next to an airplane, but what is the noise level from it when the airplane is in the sky and a person is on the ground?

      Local newsmakers, as usual when describing technical issues, wrote nonsense.
      This does not mean noise from engines, but impulse noise from the shock wave generated during supersonic flight. The sanitary standard is 125 dB. The Concorde reached 130 dB. The X-59 should be no more than 75 dB. It's like a strong slam of a car door.
      How it turns out in practice - flights will show. According to calculations, Concorde should have had no more than 110 dB, but it turned out to be 130.
  5. bone1
    bone1 30 October 2023 18: 16
    0
    Are originality and ambition taken into account?? - Why, simply put, would usefulness not be taken into account? laughing
  6. osp
    osp 30 October 2023 18: 23
    0
    Quote: Aerodrome
    I remember that someone was going to make a passenger one out of TU 160.

    For what purposes?
    Not even suitable as a business jet.
    The price will be prohibitively high.
    It will not be allowed into any civilian airport due to noise and emissions levels.
    It is not clear where they will be able to fill it with nitrided kerosene.
    Yes, even for military purposes in its current form no one can produce it in large quantities
    will be - they will collect a few pieces and that’s it.
    1. mmaxx
      mmaxx 31 October 2023 17: 48
      -1
      Yes, this is just nonsense from the factory management. They wanted to beg money from higher-ups. It’s amazing how much more impudence there was.
  7. osp
    osp 30 October 2023 18: 27
    +4
    Quote from Orange Bigg
    Quote: Aerodrome
    I remember that someone was going to make a passenger one out of TU 160.


    Passengers using drums instead of cruise missiles? Prone flight. One might say that it is in comfort class.

    Structurally, it would never have become a passenger vehicle.
    And it’s pointless - compared to the same Tu-144, its supersonic speed does not exceed 10-15% of the flight time.
    This is not an indicator for the ATP.

    True, since the 90s there has been a topic of using the Tu-160SK for launching satellites.
    But again, they didn’t make the Burlak rocket.
  8. Prisoner
    Prisoner 30 October 2023 18: 52
    -1
    Did they steal the drawings for mattresses from the Concorde or the Tu-144?
    1. Kuzmitsky
      30 October 2023 19: 14
      0
      Around the time of the Tu-144, they were also planning to build something similar, and, as now, with the participation of NASA. But then for some reason this project was put on hold.
      1. Frettaskyrandi
        Frettaskyrandi 30 October 2023 20: 16
        +1
        Around the time of the Tu-144, they were also planning to build something similar, and, as now, with the participation of NASA.

        Boeing 2707 (photo in comments below) and Lockheed L-2000.



        Both projects started in 1963. NASA had nothing to do with them.
    2. Frettaskyrandi
      Frettaskyrandi 30 October 2023 19: 25
      +3
      Did they steal the drawings for mattresses from the Concorde or the Tu-144?

      Americans don’t need to “steal” anything from anyone.



      Boeing 2707. The Concorde project started in 1962, the Boeing 2707 and Tu-144 projects - in 1963. But by 1971, the Americans, having built two prototypes, recognized the project as not economically justified and closed it.
    3. mmaxx
      mmaxx 31 October 2023 17: 49
      0
      It's not the other way around.
      The amers always had enough innovation for everyone.
  9. Soldatov V.
    Soldatov V. 30 October 2023 19: 18
    -2
    As far as I understand, we do not work on such topics. But in principle, it would be possible to make a supersonic passenger aircraft based on the TU-22M. You need to make a fuselage of a size for 30-40 people, and take the rest from the TU-22M, and leave the wings with variable geometry. Tickets will, of course, be expensive, but we have a lot of rich Pinocchios, there are people to fly with. soldier
    1. mmaxx
      mmaxx 31 October 2023 17: 50
      -2
      Yeah. And smash it on the runway when landing.
      Yes, can you even imagine this plane? Transporting people...
    2. mmaxx
      mmaxx 1 November 2023 08: 58
      -1
      Take an interest in the accident rate in military and civil aviation. There will be no questions. It would also be nice to imagine the price of the Tu-22M3, and its economic efficiency. But it’s better not to talk about just the Tu-22 at all. This is a killer plane. Shame on Tupolev.
  10. VladimirNET
    VladimirNET 30 October 2023 19: 20
    +2
    What's the point of an airplane (even a fast one),
    if he (on himself) - carries the minimum weight?
    Judging by the sharpness of their monster (they already had this).
  11. Dedok
    Dedok 31 October 2023 08: 02
    0
    This article misses the most important thing: how much money does NASA have in its budget for such research?
    How do they spend it? - i.e. what results does the average person see?
    what prospects open up when conducting research.... etc.
    and we see how some Roscosmos spends money...
  12. rotfuks
    rotfuks 31 October 2023 12: 36
    -2
    The X-59 supersonic aircraft strongly resembles the Soviet supersonic TU-144 in outline and shape. This is probably a coincidence.
  13. orionvitt
    orionvitt 31 October 2023 14: 09
    0
    You can’t praise yourself, as they say, you can’t get it from others. They themselves did something that is not yet entirely clear, and they have already hung medals for themselves. Who would doubt that Americans are the best, especially in PR. laughing