The command of the Ukrainian Armed Forces states that Ukrainian air defense allegedly shot down three of the four Iskander missiles fired by the Russian Armed Forces that night.

On the night of October 28, the Russian Armed Forces launched missile attacks on military targets in the Dnepropetrovsk region of Ukraine. According to the Ukrainian side, the strikes were carried out by Iskander missiles.

At the same time, the command of the Air Force of the Ukrainian Armed Forces claims that three of the four Iskander missiles fired by the Russian Armed Forces against targets on Ukrainian territory were shot down by Ukrainian air defense forces. The fourth missile, according to the Ukrainian military, allegedly did not reach its target in the Dnepropetrovsk region.

Thus, the Ukrainian regime continues to spread obvious lies about the “superior” performance of its air defense systems. As always, the overwhelming majority of missiles allegedly “go down,” and those that don’t “do not reach their targets.”

But such statements raise the question of why the head of the Kyiv regime, Vladimir Zelensky, and other senior Ukrainian officials regularly beg the West for additional air and missile defense systems? After all, the Ukrainian air defense, judging by the statements of representatives of the Air Force of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, already works wonderfully, the vast majority of missiles are “shot down,” and the rest of the missiles “do not hit their targets.”

In fact, the Ukrainian media are prohibited from disseminating information about the true consequences of missile strikes by the Russian Armed Forces, especially since they are carried out exclusively against military targets or on the infrastructure involved in supporting the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Accordingly, official representatives of the Ukrainian command provide the press with dosed and distorted information.

Comments

[ZovSailor]

So, what suckers are these Bandernitsiks, who will supply
new air defense weapons and others, if they cope well,
shooting down all 15 missiles out of 10? And the UAV even when overloaded
mode, all swarms land safely without
single losses?
How then do numerous photos and videos appear online?
although this is strictly prohibited by the fascists of the clown gang,
about the destruction of non-milk objects by geraniums and mopeds
and other flowers?

[Anarchist]

Previously, the command of the Ukrainian Armed Forces claimed that they did not have the means to combat ballistic missiles. And then look, three were shot down. Probably someone was throwing pickles again...

[carpenter]

Quote: Anarchist

And then look, three were shot down. Probably someone was throwing pickles again...

The Russian command stated:
At night, attacks were carried out on Ukrainian Armed Forces facilities in Dnepropetrovsk, Krivoy Rog and a separate Onyx missile attack (but not Iskander) on the port of Izmail and the south of the Odessa region.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

Previously, they knocked down five out of four... are there really no more dominoes on the abacus?

[Alexander 3]

They knocked down Eskanders using the sound of a moped with cans of tomatoes.

[alexoff]

New cucumbers have grown, a new harvest has been rolled into jars

[zloybond]

If you try to grasp the author’s logic, the enemy must provide an accurate report of what was destroyed and how. Well, we don’t have the practice of reporting to the media where they tipped us off. It is common to prevent the dissemination of information on critical objects. Not to be confused with civilians - on the contrary, everything is always loud there. And both sides do this whether someone likes it or not.

[Alemax]

There is objective control data. The rest is lyrics and bullshit.

[MaximR]

Where can I see them, this objective control data?
The Russian Ministry of Defense declares that all the missiles hit the target, and they shot down 90%.
And vice versa, when the Ukrainians launch, their missiles hit the target, but ours are shot down.

[azkolt]

Quote: MaximR

Where can I see them, this objective control data?
The Russian Ministry of Defense declares that all the missiles hit the target, and they shot down 90%.
And vice versa, when the Ukrainians launch, their missiles hit the target, but ours are shot down.

Both our sides are lying, that’s understandable. True, that side doesn’t bother me much, I don’t like it when ours lies, deceives and misleads us. Here's an example of the man from the ribbon
and somehow it doesn’t quite fit in with the cheerful reports from TV every day!
“The weather is quite good, as for the current time of year (from the point of view of me and most of my fighters - that’s for sure), but these changes are also quite enough to strain your health. No rain, no snow, no wind - none of the above mentioned health does not add value to a fighter in a trench.
Accordingly, commanders’ skills in logistics and local supply will now begin to come to the fore. And if anyone thinks that this is not difficult, what is difficult is assaults, shooting and forced marches - come and visit us, we will conduct a master class. They joke here that even Hamas has rotations, but we don’t have much luck with this (there really aren’t enough people), and the people squeezed out since the first (and so far only) wave of mobilization have not become any younger or healthier.
I will do what I myself urged not to do - I will give a bad example to others, and with almost specifics. “Wild Division of Donbass” - they already have a percentage of sick people like during the first good frost. The reaction of the command is zero (“we don’t care about anything!”, “they’ll fix their health at the training ground!”, “this is a new Covid, it’s safe”), adequate work in this direction is not being carried out at all. Well, at least they change the tires, and that’s good. But when the cold really hits and the weather gets lousy unlike today, how are they going to fight? They will drive such “neighbors” onto your flank, who already have half of them lying in the trenches even without shelling, and then they will throw up their hands: “Well, where else do you need armored vehicles? Say thank you for giving you someone to cover your flanks.” Yes, thank you, everyone at once.
So, neither with entrusted property, nor with l/s as its special subtype - this is not necessary.
Special greetings to the Siberians who will go to the front for the first time. I’ve heard about you guys since 2014, and since 2022 I’ve become convinced: everyone is very, very happy that it’s not frosty in Siberia at -40 C, but keep in mind that the frost here is different and the climate is different, here the humidity is higher and with a slight minus, it will knock down the unprepared very hard. I’ll quote one of your smart fellow countrymen: a Siberian is not the one who doesn’t freeze, but the one who dresses warmly. Well, just for yourself: ask your fellow countrymen what percentage of pneumonia they had in their units after the first frost in the Donbass.
Supply issues will now come to the fore. It didn’t get much better with the bald tires, but at least some action has begun. Additional routes for delivery and unloading, spare (dry) things, elimination of unauthorized heating points and other unmasking factors - in fact, the set of issues is such that it is better to be completely afraid now. February-March 22 gave many people a choice: frostbite or flight. It was completely widespread back then; I don’t want to remember those events for a long time, sorry. But now we must do everything to ensure that such a choice does not loom large before the fighters.
Well, the officers, for whom all medical care now boils down to “blow your nose and run,” are the ones who will very soon be asked the question, “Where are the people?” But at the same time, each fighter is responsible for his own life and health too. It’s not the mother and the officer who should prepare the supply of dry panties, socks and nosepieces, but he himself should think about it.
As Alexander Sergeevich said, it’s a rather boring time; It was already November in the yard."
Well, come on security, minus!)))

[carpenter]

Quote: zloybond

If you try to grasp the author’s logic, the enemy must provide an accurate report of what was destroyed and how.

The enemy presents the owner with an answer that the owner needs, but not the one that was in reality.

[MaximR]

Is the owner so stupid or have you decided that the people placed by the owner in Srata (Ukraine) are subordinate to Zelensky and not to the owner’s curators?
The owner is fully aware of everything that is happening and, alas, Western air defense also knows how to shoot down missiles.

[123_123]

I wonder what was "intercepted" with. Something unlikely

[krops777]

I wonder what was "intercepted" with.

Like what, jars of cucumbers, you don’t know, every grandmother there has air defense. Imagine what a rich, multi-level, deeply echeloned air defense there is, a fly will not slip through, not just some kind of Iskander.

[engineer74]

Quote: 123_123

I wonder what was "intercepted" with. Something unlikely

In fact, Iskander also fires cruise missiles; if the routes are poorly planned, then you can drive the entire salvo under the air defense system...
But it’s hard to believe in this
If our Ministry of Defense at least sometimes shared its pictures of objective control, then many questions and doubts would fall away!
IMHO

[rotmistr60]

“Three out of four were shot down...” Can I ask what or is it a big secret? Why then does Zelensky run around Europe and various get-togethers with the participation of the Anglo-Saxons, begging for air defense systems and missiles for them, moaning that they have defeated Russian missiles and UAVs. But it turns out that Ukrainian air defense shoots down everything at once and even, according to the statement, strives for 100% destruction of air targets.

[Ghost1]

What should he do, just run around and ask for more and more, so that they don’t forget about him. This does not mean that the army has run out of weapons.

[RVAPatriot]

So he got used to running around to concerts and shows... Only now his well-being, life, etc. depend on it. IMHO

[mikh-korsakov]

I read the article. I have questions. I think I understood the meaning correctly: the author is ironic, saying, why is Kyiv begging for air defense systems if everything is in order with it? This is no reason for irony. Kyiv can beg for air defense systems so that its air defense becomes even better, because there is no limit to perfection. But the main thing is not clear from the article whether it was Iskanders that were actually launched across Ukraine at night, and, if so, Iskanders, then whether they were actually shot down. Instead of wasting irony, I would like to receive information, not irony.

[Irek]

Again, is the granny holding a jar of cucumbers from the balcony? You shouldn't believe anything, you sick people.

[Horon]

The command of the Ukrainian Armed Forces states that Ukrainian air defense allegedly shot down three of the four Iskander missiles fired by the Russian Armed Forces that night.

Not an article, but a clown on the topic “what did the ASU say?”
The author was unable to provide facts refuting the statement of the bitch and only ranted on the principle of “you’ll get it out of the way.” The author could not have bothered at all then, why did he steal the article if he could not at least somehow refute the statement of dill.

[Nickelium]

Did the girls provide the facts? Or do we trust them, but not ours?

[Horon]

Did the girls provide the facts?

Apparently they provided the author with something if he decided to write this article at all and refer to their statement.

Or do we trust them, but not ours?

Who should they use? I have not seen any facts of Iskanders being shot down by dill, just as I have not seen our official statement about their launch in the territories indicated by the APU. And the author is in no hurry to share these facts.
I just wrote the statement in a completely out of place way, immediately giving out the propaganda cliché: “you can’t shoot them down” and “the entire Russian Armed Forces destroy only military targets.” The author didn’t even bother to find out whether they even struck that territory today? Is there such information from our officials? Were Iskanders used there or not? And then try to find confirmation that the Iskanders were there and this is not a figment of someone’s imagination. Then analyze the information about how these Iskanders got there. In the end, dill have the ability to shoot down missiles and geraniums with the help of the same industrial and military objects. And so, trying to dismiss one unfounded statement with the help of another unfounded statement, the author only drew attention to the statement of the bitches.

[alexoff]

It is impossible to refute an empty sketch of a woman, since there is nothing to refute. Now, if they showed specifics, like a downed Iskander fell in such an area, and here is a photo of him lying in a field, then there would be something to refute.

[Horon]

It is impossible to refute the empty sketch of a bitch

Well, why?
1. Was there a boy? I mean blow.
2. Were Iskanders used for this purpose or were they even trying to shoot down a reconnaissance UAV?
3.

Now, if only they showed specifics, like a downed Iskander fell in such an area, and here is a photo of him lying in a field

- and this is also an argument when presenting this kind of information.
The author, instead of providing at least any argument (since he took up this topic), simply smeared the dill statement on the wall, apparently to give it more publicity. If you cannot refute or confirm information from your opponent with serious arguments, then why mention it at all? Indeed, the author of the article has now acted as a “drain tank for the dill media” on the pages of Vo - nothing more. I took the information from there, slapped on a couple of boring propaganda clichés and threw it onto the pages. The level of such an article is high school, but there is a feeling that it was made for an ordinary “attack on the fan.”

[alexoff]

The Russian command does not give the population details of what and where they were hit, since they do not know how to participate in the information war, do not want and do not intend to. This news is from the category of six daggers being shot down, which disintegrated into atoms and Klitschko did not pose with them, and then in the Western media, Ukrainian gunners said that the dagger generally flies three times. Such news does not need to be refuted with facts and waste of time on it, they should simply be ridiculed. Facts are needed when a Bulgarian S300 rocket flies into yet another high-rise building and burns down several apartments and their residents.

[Horon]

The Russian command does not give the population details about what and where they hit

Sorry, but is your common sense okay? Here is an article about the statement of the Ukrainians, but you state that there is no information on this matter from our official representatives, then why should I know what the dill are saying there? I can find out this if I wish and on their resources. Then this article, based on your logic, is simply a “drain tank” to attract attention to the statements of the bitches! And it only disguises itself as adequacy by using clichés as a “counter-argument”.

This news is from the category of six daggers shot down

This is not news - this is the spread of nonsense and enemy propaganda by media that position themselves as Russian. The article was written for the sake of hype, and not for the sake of real information.

Such news does not need to be refuted with facts and waste of time on it, they should simply be ridiculed.

On social networks - yes, for fans of s@cha, but on an information resource, “ridiculing” should look reasoned in the form of evidence and facts. Otherwise, why then repeat someone else's nonsense? This is not a satirical resource and does not seem to be a yellow press. Or was I wrong?

Facts are needed when a Bulgarian S300 rocket flies into yet another high-rise building and burns down several apartments and their residents.

Facts are always needed if you are trying to prove or disprove something. If you are not going to prove or refute, considering it meaningless nonsense, then why even pay attention to someone’s nonsense?

[Prisoner]

Somehow the Munchausens have slowed down. Previously, 5 out of 4 were shot down.

[Constantine N]

Are Athams an analogue of Iskanders? If we shoot them down, then we should be able to do it with the help of Westerners. the only question is the availability of these pros in the right place

[alexoff]

Only we are showing downed missiles, but it’s unlikely that the ground-borne missiles could have hit the field next to the village?

[air wolf]

Why not everything at once and where are the detailed reports?

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

The command of the Ukrainian Armed Forces states that Ukrainian air defense allegedly shot down three of the four Iskander missiles fired by the Russian Armed Forces that night.

good thing not four out of three launched

[faterdom]

Yes, we have weakened...
Previously they shot down 100-150%, but now it’s only 75! Double reduction!

[voyaka uh]

These were Iskander -K - winged ground-based missiles.
And cruise missiles, both Ukrainian and Russian, are shot down by air defense
not the first time. Unlike ballistic ones.
The article is a reprint from Ukrainian media.
Only the letter "K" was delicately removed.

[alexoff]

Only cruise missiles haven’t flown for almost a month, they’re being hoarded. And only geraniums fly so that the PPO can work on them

[Iris]

There is a balance in the information struggle. Either they claim that they shot down more missiles than were launched, or here they claim that UAVs hit the same high-rise building in the center of Moscow twice by accident. And these are not even UAVs, but their fragments, since the devices themselves were shot down at distant approaches. On both sides, the struggle in the infosphere is being conducted in a primitive, if not dull, manner. And therefore it evokes caustic comments and even laughter. Although it's not funny, it's very sad...

[Petr_Koldunov]

I think that they even shot down seven of the four of these missiles...

[lutckroma]

Since the beginning of the SVO, we have released about 3 thousand. rockets and they were never left without light and water!

[Gory]

Of course they shot down - with warehouses with ammunition and equipment

[_Ugene_]

It depends on what kind of Iskanders there were, if they were winged Iskander-Ks then it’s quite possible, if they were quasi-ballistic Iskander-Ms then they’re a lie

[storm]

The lack of operational information from Russian sources confirming the defeat of targets on the territory of Ukraine makes it possible for the Ukrainian media to spread their own nonsense......

[garik77]

It's not like that! Of the four Iskanders, five were shot down! And ten more Daggers along the way.