The new speaker of the US House of Representatives named the conditions for a new aid package to Ukraine

12
The new speaker of the US House of Representatives named the conditions for a new aid package to Ukraine

In his “inaugural” speech, the new speaker of the American House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, also touched upon the Palestinian-Israeli and Ukrainian conflict.

According to the speaker, he fully supports the provision of financial and military assistance to Israel, but he has a number of questions regarding Ukraine.
Mike Johnson said that in order to approve the allocation of a new large package of military assistance to Ukraine, which the US President is calling for approval, at least two main conditions must be met.



Johnson:

Firstly, any assistance to Ukraine will be discussed only if it is fully accountable. Secondly, the White House must clearly voice the goals that it pursues with the allocation of this assistance to Ukraine. No uncontrolled allocation of funds to Ukraine will be supported.

It was previously reported that an audit of funds already allocated to the Kyiv regime will be carried out by the Pentagon Inspector General. At the same time, the United States itself cannot yet really answer the question of how to conduct an audit when the lion’s share of the funds has already been spent, and the number of companies through which they went is in the dozens, and in addition they are located in a number of countries around the world.

Let us remind you that Biden is going to link the allocation of financial assistance to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan into one package. The total amount is more than $100 billion, of which $64 billion is for the needs of Ukraine (in fact, the American military-industrial complex). Meanwhile, the US press writes that now the Biden administration, turning to congressmen, asks them to link “the need to allocate new funds to Ukraine with the benefit of the United States.” In particular, congressmen are asked to tell their electorate that such an allocation of funds will supposedly “benefit the American economy by allowing the creation of new jobs.” In other words, there is no talk at all about benefits for Ukraine itself.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    12 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      26 October 2023 08: 43
      Binding Ukraine with bureaucracy... to pay less, demand more
      1. -2
        26 October 2023 08: 59
        Below there was already an article about this. I repeat once again, there should be no illusions - they are not against supplies and finances for Ukraine. The issue of control, and this is all being resolved
        1. +1
          26 October 2023 09: 37
          There are no illusions, and he is of course an enemy, but you can probably deal with him and speak “the same language.”
          An opponent of sexual minorities, he considers it necessary to ban the discussion of gender identity and same-sex relationships in schools. Considered one of the key allies of former Republican President Donald Trump
      2. +1
        26 October 2023 09: 14
        -named the conditions for the allocation of a new aid package to Ukraine...
        And further:
        -The total amount is more than $100 billion, of which $64 billion is for the needs of Ukraine (in fact, the American military-industrial complex).
        They will hang ALL 100 billion on Ukraine - and don’t go to grandma.
        -
    2. +1
      26 October 2023 08: 49
      “The White House must clearly voice the goals that it pursues with the allocation of this assistance to Ukraine.” - This is interesting, well, Biden will conditionally state that the goals are for Ukraine to reach the borders of 1991, and then what?
    3. +3
      26 October 2023 08: 50
      addressing congressmen, asks them to link “the need to allocate new funds to Ukraine with the benefit of the United States”
      The fact that the United States is benefiting, not insignificantly, from the conflict in Ukraine has long been clear and beneficial, first of all, to the military-industrial complex and to those who lobby for this help by receiving additional “salaries” from one of the companies of this complex and kickbacks from Ukrainian friends. At the same time, Kyiv is burning American aid at the LBS along with its population and hopes for its infinity. Regarding the audit. Kyiv always has the necessary “reporting” at hand: how much, where and to whom, incl. and black cash. Therefore, audit is for those who believe in it and to simulate control.
    4. +1
      26 October 2023 08: 54
      They will allocate money to 404th. They will bargain, squeeze out some of the goodies for themselves and allocate them. There is a consensus in the desire to be the first and only in the world. The paths are just different, but not much. So, whether we are Republicans or Democrats, we are the same beef, only stamped in a different color. And we need to win and do it in such a way that there are no benefits for our sworn friends. There were only losses.
      1. 0
        26 October 2023 09: 26
        For now, we can only ensure a fall in shares through the demonstrative destruction of their military-industrial complex products. True, the decline is offset by an increase in the number of orders request
    5. +1
      26 October 2023 09: 33
      This speaker is all Republican, but Democrats also supported him, provided that he does not interfere with aid to Ukraine. He has already made a statement saying he favors maintaining aid as long as costs are controlled. The military-industrial lobby has the final say, and politicians merely implement the guidelines.
    6. 0
      26 October 2023 11: 14
      Meanwhile, the US press writes that now the Biden administration, turning to congressmen, asks them to link “the need to allocate new funds to Ukraine with the benefit of the United States.” In particular, congressmen are asked to tell their electorate that such an allocation of funds will supposedly “benefit the American economy by allowing the creation of new jobs.” In other words, there is no talk at all about benefits for Ukraine itself.

      It's all as simple as 5 kopecks! And the Ukrainians, Jews, and Chinese of Taiwan do not defend any freedom or rights. They help restore the owner's economy
    7. 0
      26 October 2023 13: 10
      Another benefactor? All the Yankees say one thing, do the opposite,
      and in their bosom they keep the Finnish against the Russian Federation, China, North Korea and other independent countries.
      Trust them not a penny, not a cent.
    8. 0
      27 October 2023 12: 56
      Johnson is a Republican and a comrade of Trump, and both of them understand perfectly well that the Democratic election campaign is feeding and plans to continue feeding with the help of Ukraine, so it is necessary to control the spending of funds

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"