UK Parliamentary Defense Committee: UK will not be able to play a major role in the Pacific without a major increase in defense spending

19
UK Parliamentary Defense Committee: UK will not be able to play a major role in the Pacific without a major increase in defense spending

A new UK Defense Committee report criticizes Britain's military presence in the Indo-Pacific region, calling it "limited" and calling Britain's strategy "unclear" in the face of potential conflict with China over Taiwan.

According to the document, the UK will not be able to play an important role in the Pacific region without a serious increase in defense spending. As they say, who would doubt it.



In addition, it says:

With a very modest presence compared to allies, virtually no combat forces in the region and little regular activity, the UK Ministry of Defense's pivot to the Indo-Pacific is far from achieving its goals.

Royal maritime patrol ships fleet HMS Spey and HMS Tamar, which first deployed to the region in 2021, are tasked with continued deployment to the Indo-Pacific region. At the same time, the UK carrier strike group will return to the region only in 2025, and only if there are no problems with the aircraft carriers, but for now there are such problems.

The British government's actions, including participation in AUKUS and building stronger relationships with India and Japan, are supported by the committee, but they said close military cooperation with other countries in Southeast Asia and the Pacific also needs to be strengthened.

British lawmakers have suggested that in the near future China "looks likely" to want to "confront Taiwan" through conventional military means or "gray zone" attacks. In response, they are calling on the government to develop a “cross-government” strategy in the Indo-Pacific region, which should include plans drawn up by the Ministry of Defense for a “comprehensive defense and diplomatic response” to combat China's growing power.

According to the approved SSN-AUKUS decision, the British nuclear submarine design will be used to meet Australian and British requirements. However, the UK Defense Committee expressed concern about the “lack of clarity regarding how large numbers of submarines will ultimately be built, and the cost and availability of skilled manpower.

At the same time, the British want to expand the AUKUS Pillar 2 component, which currently covers advanced technologies such as hypersonic missile technologies and quantum computing, to “secure and diversify supply chains for ammunition and critical minerals.”
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    19 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      25 October 2023 20: 44
      Patam, why is it no longer Great Britain, but Small Britain... laughing
      1. 0
        25 October 2023 20: 50
        It seems that Western gunsmiths “to the death” owe their prosperity to Putin and Xi.
        1. +1
          25 October 2023 22: 17
          So it is, but the “mistress” of the seas can now barely crawl with a stick around her hut)))
        2. 0
          26 October 2023 22: 30
          Monica Zelinski - "driver" of Western gunsmiths. "Traces" - everywhere;
    2. +2
      25 October 2023 20: 45
      and UK strategy 'unclear' in the face of potential conflict with China over Taiwan

      Well, where are these bugs going against China? fool There, only one name remains of the Royal Navy.
      1. +2
        25 October 2023 22: 15
        Let them climb, let the fleet become deep-sea
      2. +1
        25 October 2023 23: 28
        Quote: kventinasd
        Well, where are these bugs going against China?

        They, perhaps, would be glad to leave to the side, but they can’t: like slaves are chained to Washington’s war chariot... Uncle Sam steers, and John Bull, puffing and sweating, keeps up with her as best he can... Stumbles, falls , but continues to crawl after the cowboy to the abyss of BIG BUD BOOM.
        AHA.
    3. +3
      25 October 2023 20: 46
      [b][/b]grandfleet is gone, but the phantom pain remains. Like a eunuch - everything has been gutted, but I have indecent dreams
    4. +1
      25 October 2023 20: 53
      There are a lot of words, the terminology is beautiful, but... There is nothing behind it.
    5. 0
      25 October 2023 20: 53
      There are a lot of words, the terminology is beautiful, but... There is nothing behind it.
    6. +1
      25 October 2023 21: 00
      What the hell is the Pacific Ocean, the Britons have no direct access to the quiet one, they sit in the Atlantic and live there as long as they give
    7. fiv
      +1
      25 October 2023 21: 42
      Great Britain creates a vacuum in the oral cavity, affecting foreign parts of the body. Her amputation itches, itches!
    8. +3
      25 October 2023 21: 50
      The upcoming “Long March” of the Britons in the Asia-Pacific region in 2025 raises strong doubts. Next year, "Queen Elizabeth" becomes a capital stock. The departure of the only aircraft carrier with a ridiculous escort group, most likely even without MAPL, seems shamelessly adventurous.
    9. +1
      25 October 2023 23: 13
      Stop, Tommy! Watch the strait and cry for the past.
    10. +1
      26 October 2023 00: 31
      Phantom pains based on "Mistress of the Seas".
    11. 0
      26 October 2023 02: 27
      The phantom pains of the small-shaven people are progressing...they still can’t survive the decline of the empire. It turned out that without colonies they are just a small island with a rapidly degrading nation. A curtain
    12. 0
      26 October 2023 02: 51
      A new UK Defense Committee report criticizes the British military presence in the Indo-Pacific region.
      Where is Britain and the Indo-Pacific region...
    13. 0
      26 October 2023 09: 43
      The question here is very simple: WHAT has Great Britain forgotten in the Pacific region in order to play any role there at all?
    14. 0
      26 October 2023 12: 44
      Well, here’s a question for China =)) It has the greatest strength to squeeze markets from the Britons =))))) More they squeeze - less GDP. Less GDP - more problems))

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"