Western edition: Some countries are afraid to enter into agreements on military production with Ukraine because of the risks for their citizens

15
Western edition: Some countries are afraid to enter into agreements on military production with Ukraine because of the risks for their citizens

Western countries are not very willing to agree to sign agreements with the Ukrainian authorities on the opening of joint military production on its territory. This was reported by The Financial Times, citing its own sources.

First of all, concerns are related to the risks for citizens of Western countries who will work at such enterprises. It is clear that it will not be possible to do without specialists coming to Ukraine. Western countries will have to send their engineers, managers, and technicians to the warring country.



Their lives will be at risk, since with one hundred percent probability Russia will try to strike such objects with missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles. Some countries are afraid to enter into military production agreements with Ukraine due to the risks to their citizens. Previously, the leadership of the Russian Federation stated that such enterprises would become a legitimate military target for the Armed Forces if they were opened on Ukrainian territory.

The Ukrainian regime is experiencing a huge shortage of weapons and ammunition. The country's authorities expect to cover it, among other things, by opening joint ventures. But it is not very clear how to ensure the safety of such enterprises in conditions when the territory of Ukraine is “razed” to the Polish and Romanian borders.

It is likely that the majority of Kyiv’s potential partners in the field of defense and security will still not open branches of their defense enterprises on the territory of Ukraine, at least until the end of the armed conflict. Otherwise, specialists coming to Ukraine will begin to die, which will cause the risk of a larger escalation of the conflict and public discontent in the Western countries themselves.
  • U.S. Department of Defense
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    24 October 2023 11: 18
    It was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines (c) and how many big words there were about the opening of military production, but here it is reality
    1. +2
      24 October 2023 11: 34
      Western gunsmiths have no reason to worry. Every single one of them can come to Ukraine. And he will go to Bandera. am
      laughing lol wassat good
    2. +2
      24 October 2023 11: 48
      It’s not at all a matter of fear of companies from Western and other countries; as you know, those who are afraid are not in business.
      Western business understands perfectly well that opening such production in Ukraine makes no sense, so it was decided long ago that such production would be opened in NATO countries, even if formally they would be listed as Ukrainian companies.

      The question, as you know, is something else, no matter how trivial it may sound, namely money.
      The question of who will finance this “pleasure” has not yet been resolved if Ukraine itself is completely bankrupt and is 100% military supported and 30-50% supported by NATO countries, the IMF and other Anglo-Saxon layers.

      Of course, the business itself, without the guarantees of Ukrainian sponsors, does not intend to invest its capital in such a dubious pleasure as the production and supply of weapons to beggars and bankrupts, no matter how the governments of the sponsoring countries ask and insist. The decision remains with the politicians of the NATO countries and primarily the United States. hi
    3. 0
      25 October 2023 14: 45
      FIRST of all, they are afraid of leakage (or rather, sale to the outside) of secret information from Ukrainian partners.
  2. -1
    24 October 2023 11: 22
    It’s in vain, don’t let them believe the rumors - Russia is not at war, but is conducting a military military operation,
    you can familiarize yourself with the goals and objectives, and in conclusion
    The Russian Federation never fights with civilians and does not destroy civilians
    objects: hospitals, schools, residential buildings.
    It should be remembered that a bakery plant that produces peaceful missiles and shells from UAVs, as well as a Hotel and Bathhouse with foreign mercenaries will be considered military targets!
    And for the rest - we kindly ask - welcome to us.
    1. 0
      24 October 2023 11: 51
      Quote: ZovSailor
      It’s in vain, don’t let them believe the rumors - Russia is not at war, but is conducting a military defense

      The SVO will destroy the fascists and if there are citizens of other states with them, they will be destroyed. It was like this always and everywhere.
  3. +3
    24 October 2023 11: 22
    It would be better if they remembered how many people died from these friendly countries. How did the media report about the deaths of 5000 Poles? Then it was erased, I think the figures for other countries are also in the thousands
    1. +2
      24 October 2023 11: 35
      Quote: APASUS
      It would be better if they remembered how many people died from these friendly countries. How did the media report about the deaths of 5000 Poles? Then it was erased, I think the figures for other countries are also in the thousands

      For the Poles the figure was 10000. am
      1. +1
        24 October 2023 15: 32
        Quote: Bearded
        For the Poles the figure was 10000.

        There were 5000 dead and something like 10000 injured. But then all this was wiped out and the following phrase appeared: 5000 injured (something like that)
  4. +2
    24 October 2023 11: 42
    Western countries are not very willing to agree to sign agreements with the Ukrainian authorities on the opening of joint military production on its territory
    And who wants to throw extra money down the drain (they only have time to throw it in) and at the same time have the risk of losses among their specialists. So far, the statements of the Turkish Bayraktar and the German Rheinmetall AG remain merely agreements of intent and nothing more.
  5. +1
    24 October 2023 12: 09
    It is likely that the majority of Kyiv’s potential partners in the field of defense and security will still not open branches of their defense enterprises on the territory of Ukraine, at least until
    . With foreigners everything is clear... the question is simple, until when, to what milestones, the achievement of what goals will be acceptable for graduating from the SVO???
  6. +1
    24 October 2023 12: 50
    What does the “joint venture” form of production mean in this case?
    Ukraine is completely bankrupt. She has no money. There are no resources. There are no energy resources to meet the needs of powerful industrial production. All that it can provide for its part is territory for construction.
    It turns out that the joint form of ownership in the Ukrainian version looks like this: you build factories, provide logistics, supply components, supply technologies, supply specialists, maintain production, maintain personnel, and give the manufactured products to us free of charge. And we... and we lease land for you to build factories. For which you also pay us.
    It’s clear that no one is in a hurry to turn around there. And considering that for involving themselves in this dubious gamble, sooner or later a hypersonic congratulation on opening a business will certainly arrive from Russia, then European businessmen want to enter Ukraine even less.
    1. 0
      24 October 2023 15: 48
      Foreign, cunning guys... they know how to breed useful idiots! In their opinion, the costs are acceptable for them, but they threw/blinded a fair amount of crap for us.
      And to stimulate the skakuas, they will write a bunch of “protocols of intent”, trumpet them there and... the foolish skakuas will still jump in ecstasy!
      The top greengrocers themselves... so they are fed a little, but the most relish is what they themselves collect/gather, their own!
  7. 0
    25 October 2023 08: 03
    Wow! Therefore, it is necessary to kill these same citizens with all available means, so that there is no desire to meddle in someone else’s business!
  8. 0
    26 October 2023 01: 55
    The photo is simply a miracle, wonderful. It would be more correct for the Americans to erect a monument as a symbol of their victory in wars, not the Marines hoisting the US flag, but the American soldiers loading a whole container of weapons for you! Kill each other as much as possible! We will help!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"