“Washington and Moscow are on the verge of conflict”: US analysts comment on the cancellation of Russia’s ratification of the nuclear testing treaty

12
“Washington and Moscow are on the verge of conflict”: US analysts comment on the cancellation of Russia’s ratification of the nuclear testing treaty

The situation with nuclear security agreements between the United States and Russia is rapidly deteriorating. The website of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Government contains an article by one of the American analysts about the increasing risk of nuclear confrontation.

The article indicates that Russia withdrew its ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, explaining its actions by the fact that the United States never ratified this treaty, and in the current situation Moscow needs to establish parity with America.



Washington and Moscow are one step away from direct conflict

- emphasized in the material.

The very cancellation of ratification of the treaty indicates the need to pay attention to solving the problem of the nuclear threat. The United States, the American analyst argues, must set an example for other countries and ratify the treaty. Otherwise, it looks very strange - the United States expects compliance with the treaty from Russia or other countries, but does not ratify it itself.

The conflict situation in Ukraine only increases the risks associated with the potential use of nuclear weapons. Western propagandists often claim that talk of the possibility of using nuclear weapons is just a “bluff,” but American analysts believe that this is not entirely true. The risks are increasing and US authorities should make efforts to minimize them. The author of the material suggests turning to the experience of de-escalation during the Caribbean crisis. Otherwise, a situation may arise when any country possessing nuclear weapons decides to use them against certain targets, and then it will be too late to talk about de-escalation.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    24 October 2023 08: 18
    One step away from conflict? It is already underway, in its initial stage
    1. +5
      24 October 2023 08: 22
      So let's figure out who is pushing the world towards nuclear war and is he going to participate in it himself? The United States itself is not ready for a nuclear war, all its fighting fervor is raising the stakes, I am sure the US Jewish lobby and the shadow government are well aware that their wealth will simply burn out, but the United States has no other choice but to fight somewhere, this entity can only exist for account of the war, but the era of conventional wars is passing. The only way to defeat the United States is by removing the dollar as a world currency; it’s not easy, but you have to try. This is the only chance to peacefully reorganize the world.
  2. +2
    24 October 2023 08: 23
    Does anyone expect the hegemon to comply with treaties that the hegemon has not ratified?
  3. 0
    24 October 2023 08: 25
    Washington and Moscow are one step away from direct conflict
    . The gun, of course, hangs on the wall.
    It looks like the jackets are cocked too.
    Will anyone risk pulling the trigger???
  4. -6
    24 October 2023 08: 41
    I beg you, what conflict? If the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank are headed by natural agents of influence...
    Yes, everything is according to plan, and even for our money...
    1. -3
      24 October 2023 09: 54
      I beg you, what conflict? If the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank are headed by natural agents of influence...
      Yes, everything is according to plan, and even for our money...

      apparently they give you disadvantages of ale with antosha wink
  5. +3
    24 October 2023 08: 43
    Washington and Moscow are one step away from direct conflict
    If the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 was averted at the last moment, then it is not known whether a new one could be averted, and even in the last minutes? Today, the technologies are different and decisions are made faster, and the politicians in the United States are dumber and more aggressive.
  6. +1
    24 October 2023 08: 46
    Oh, excuse me, what kind of vegetable did the women have at the landfill in Nevada? To defuse tension?
  7. +1
    24 October 2023 09: 02
    By any means they try to gain an advantage over everyone else. And this agreement, and the elimination of chemistry, they, the poor, have no money. But biological laboratories have shoved biological laboratories into all the holes. They climb into all the cracks where they don’t ask. Is it really difficult to add a clause to such agreements that even if one of the parties has ratified the agreement, it has no legal force and is completely optional until all parties to the agreement also ratify it. Thus, by ratifying the treaty, you can show your extreme desire for peace and order, without denying yourself or others anything.
  8. 0
    24 October 2023 09: 43
    Yeah, do you think your ratification will change anything?
  9. 0
    24 October 2023 17: 59
    Well... the journalist looks at things correctly, calling on the States to be the first to set an example of peacefulness, and not brandish weapons and sanctions cudgels, assuring everyone around them of their exceptional peacefulness
  10. 0
    25 October 2023 11: 36
    In other words, if they lose, the states will use nuclear weapons.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"