Repair will extend the operation of the SU-25UTG on 8 years

19

The ongoing repair of deck training aircraft Su-25UTG will extend their operation for 8 years, a source in the military-industrial complex told AviaPort.

According to him, the Su-25UTG aircraft is being repaired at the 121-m Aviation Repair Plant in Kubinka near Moscow, at the same enterprise that is upgrading the Su-25 attack aircraft to the Su-25CM variant.

Installed on the Su-25UTG engines Р95Ш are also subject to repair, the source said.

As reported, the only one in the composition aviation The Russian Navy 279th Separate Naval Fighter Aviation Regiment, based at the Severomorsk-3 airdrome (Murmansk region), received at the end of the year 2 overhauled and returned to service Su-25UTG aircraft. Of the 13 built in 1990-1993. At the Ulan-Ude Aviation Plant of Su-25UTG serial aircraft, currently there are 279 aircraft remaining in the 7th regiment.

The design of the airplane plan is similar to that of the Su-25UB planer. Compared with the Su-XNUMHUB on the Su-25UTG reinforced chassis, set the hook for landing on the deck and others. The Su-25UTG aircraft was produced at the Ulan-Ude aircraft plant in a small series.

The Su-25UTG aircraft is not designed to perform any combat functions, it removed all equipment designed to perform combat missions.

Su-25UTG has a maximum take-off weight of 16245 kg. Its maximum speed is 930-950 km / h. The length of the runaway when taking off from the cruiser's topline is 175 m; the length of the run when landing on the deck with the use of a refiner 90 m.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dmitry23RUS
    +1
    10 January 2013 12: 26
    The old woman, Sushka, is still in operation ... pleasantly surprised ... and in our city in Krasnodar only relatively new twenty-sevenths fly ..... although 30-40 pieces disassembled are simply lying around at the airport ...
    1. 0
      10 January 2013 21: 10
      It is necessary to call these new "Irons", firstly for the letters UTG, and secondly, for the fact that they are good at ironing the enemy laughing
  2. toguns
    0
    10 January 2013 13: 01
    Well this is not the case, it is necessary to create new essentially deck-based training aircraft, as an option to take the Mi-29cub as a basis and bring it to mind.
    1. Sergh
      +1
      10 January 2013 13: 44
      Quote: toguns
      as an option, take the Mi-29cube as a basis and bring it to mind.

      What is it to bring? For a long time, everything is ready and 26 cars have been purchased, just waiting for the arrival!

      1. PLO
        +1
        10 January 2013 14: 01
        What is it to bring? For a long time, everything is ready and 26 cars have been purchased, just waiting for the arrival!

        20 Mig-29K and 4 Mig-29KUB were ordered
    2. VAF
      VAF
      +1
      10 January 2013 15: 48
      Quote: toguns
      Well this is not the case, you need essentially new deck-based training aircraft


      Yaroslav, after all, any machine that has a 2-seater cabin and the ability to land on deck is inherently a combat training aircraft!
      But the training, because this is just the su-25UTG. which is intended for training and training !!!
      The only drawback of this machine. this is a large take-off distance (due to design features and layout) and on the Kuze take-off is carried out only from one place !!!

      Beautiful emblem on UTG's ... sparrow, proud bird !!! fellow



  3. toguns
    +1
    10 January 2013 14: 22
    Quote: Sergh
    What is it to bring? For a long time, everything is ready and 26 cars have been purchased, just waiting for the arrival!

    wassat 4 fleets and one flotilla of 26 cars ???
    it is not serious and very small ...
    minimum order should be 330 vehicles (2 regiments per fleet, Caspian also regiment, regiment training MiG-29cub and regiment per thread preparation of aircraft carriers)
    what's what and how to bring ....
    for training the mig-29cub, as I think, it is nevertheless necessary to redo all the same flights of naval aviation are not as simple as they seem.
    1. PLO
      +1
      10 January 2013 14: 32
      4 fleets and one flotilla of 26 cars ???

      what are 4 fleets?
      these are ship fighters, i.e. they are intended for landing on deck

      we have only one aircraft carrier, Kuznetsov, just for him all these machines are designed
      1. VAF
        VAF
        +1
        10 January 2013 15: 55
        Quote: olp
        all these machines are just for him


        Oleg, +! Only it would be more correct to put it ... "under it"! Because if we still had aircraft-carrying ships capable of receiving naval fighter and assault aircraft, then all the decks would be based on them as well "! drinks

      2. toguns
        +1
        10 January 2013 15: 56
        Quote: olp
        what are 4 fleets?
        these are ship fighters, i.e. they are intended for landing on deck
        we have only one aircraft carrier, Kuznetsov, just for him all these machines are designed

        and what do you suggest ???
        if we do not build a carrier fleet to refuse carrier aircraft as such ???
    2. VAF
      VAF
      +1
      10 January 2013 15: 51
      Quote: toguns
      4 fleets and one flotilla


      Eco took you apart after the holidays wink drinks wassat +! request

      The fact that the Fleet needs to be equipped with strike aircraft back is indisputable, but here we are talking about pure-deck aviation!?!

      1. toguns
        +1
        10 January 2013 16: 03
        Quote: vaf
        Eco took you apart after the holidays wink drinks wassat +! request
        The fact that the Fleet needs to be equipped with strike aircraft back is indisputable, but here we are talking about pure-deck aviation!?!

        Sergey, what can you do for the holidays :)
        about deck aviation
        Sergey, you probably know better than me that this very aircraft must be prepared first and secondly the sane aircraft carrier must be born at last, with all due respect to Kuznetsov, he is no longer the same, and thirdly, in fact, we save a moment from bankruptcy with all the consequences.
        and fourthly, yes, carrier-based aviation will actually be located at airfields, but it will exist, and not depend on the health of Kuznetsov.
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +2
          10 January 2013 16: 17
          Quote: toguns
          that this very aviation must first be prepared


          Not even discussed ++++++ !!!!!! soldier

          That's why they "keep" the Su-25UTG in 279 kiap! That would not only fly on the RP, but also "teach" young pilots, well, and for .. "maintaining pants" and eliminating interruptions!



          Quote: toguns
          secondly, we must finally give birth to a sane aircraft carrier


          I agree here too. instead of 4 barges Mistralek it was quite possible to own your own or finally Juan Carlos "rework" and then .. there would be more sense!



          Quote: toguns
          thirdly, with a serial order for cubes, we actually save a moment from bankruptcy with all the consequences.


          I agree here the same, because. at the expense of one "modernization" for "someone" ... not to swim, and even more so from the UAC!

          Quote: toguns
          and fourthly, yes, carrier-based aviation will actually be located at airfields, but it will exist, and not depend on the health of Kuznetsov.


          And here I agree, +!

          1. toguns
            0
            10 January 2013 18: 12
            Quote: vaf
            That's why they "keep" the Su-25UTG in 279 kiap! That would not only fly on the RP, but also "teach" young pilots, well, and for .. "maintaining pants" and eliminating interruptions!

            Su-25UTG essentially 24 years
            most likely no.
            It may even fall apart, the conclusion is that you need to make a new model a copy of the Mig-29cub, but designed for training.
            Quote: vaf
            I agree here too. instead of 4 barges Mistralek it was quite possible to own your own or finally Juan Carlos "rework" and then .. there would be more sense!

            Juan Carlos is essentially the same pre-navigator, and if you do it, you need to do science
            not less than 90-100 thousand tons, a catapult, an air wing of 90 aircraft + a numerical strength of 4500 people.
        2. PLO
          +1
          10 January 2013 16: 22
          if we do not build a carrier fleet to refuse carrier aircraft as such ???


          Sergey, you probably know better than me that this very aircraft must be prepared first and secondly the sane aircraft carrier must be born at last, with all due respect to Kuznetsov, he is no longer the same, and thirdly, in fact, we save a moment from bankruptcy with all the consequences.
          and fourthly, yes, carrier-based aviation will actually be located at airfields, but it will exist, and not depend on the health of Kuznetsov.


          sorry but this is some kind of nonsense
          why do we need decked versions of airplanes if there aren’t actually ships on which to land them?
          carrier-based aircraft are no different from conventional ones based on land airfields, and the pilots who will control them from this will not become sea
          1. VAF
            VAF
            +1
            10 January 2013 16: 36
            Quote: olp
            carrier-based aircraft are no different from conventional ones based on land airfields, and the pilots who will control them from this will not become sea


            Oleg, here you are wrong. because land and sea aircraft are structurally different. and training and skills in applying their knowledge, experience, tactics of using weapons, etc. land and sea pilots are very different! +! soldier

            1. PLO
              +1
              10 January 2013 16: 47
              I welcome, Sergey

              Oleg, here you are wrong. because land and sea aircraft are structurally different. and training and skills in applying their knowledge, experience, tactics of using weapons, etc. land and sea pilots are very different! +!


              well constructively by itself
              if I’m not mistaken about the chassis, a hook is naturally installed and some kind of improvements taking into account the operation in the sea (humidity, salt, etc. ..)

              but as I understand uv toguns offers to send in the regular units deck versions of fighter aircraft in the amount of 330 pieces and oblige all pilots to undergo training at NITKA belay
              it's some kind of oxymoron, carrier-based aviation in the absence of aircraft carriers in the required quantity
              Is the tactics of using the Su-33 from the land airport different from the tactics of using the Su-27 somewhere near Moscow?

              By the way, is it interesting to have brake parachutes on the decks?
              1. VAF
                VAF
                +2
                10 January 2013 18: 38
                Quote: olp
                By the way, is it interesting to have brake parachutes on the decks?






                Well, as you yourself understood and see that no!

                In addition to the chassis, the fuselage and wing are reinforced, the tail boom is shortened, new flaps and flaperons (of an increased area), tail keels are smaller, the sag and other deflected socks are reinforced, as well as the control system and PrNK is for the Su-33, but for the UTG all the same, only without weapons. there are stubs everywhere!

          2. +1
            10 January 2013 19: 10
            Quote: olp
            why do we need decked versions of airplanes if there aren’t actually ships on which to land them?

            Good day friends! As far as I understand this problem, we need deck-based aviation pilots, as well as airplanes ... It’s not a year or two to train good specialists ... And so it will turn out, we’ll build an aircraft carrier and find out that it’s just a barge, as it’s a fly nobody knows how to do it, and there’s nothing on it ?????
            1. PLO
              0
              10 January 2013 19: 18
              279 Separate Naval Aviation Regiment of the Naval Aviation of the Northern Fleet
              http://topwar.ru/21915-pervym-delom-samolety-279-otdelnyy-korabelnyy-istrebiteln

              yy-aviapolk-morskoy-aviacii-sevflota.html

              if you want to keep the school of deck-based aviation pilots re-equip it with whatever you want (I’m only for it), but so far we have only one aircraft carrier, creating more such nonsense
              1. +1
                10 January 2013 20: 35
                The ongoing repair of deck training aircraft Su-25UTG will extend their operation for 8 years, a source in the military-industrial complex told AviaPort.
                As far as I understand it, the repair is discussed in the article .... Another thing is that there can be no redundancy in the preparation of the flight crew and if the pilot can work with an aircraft carrier, then he will not have problems from the airfield, but vice versa. ....
                1. +1
                  11 January 2013 00: 30
                  Good night, Nikolai! And I understand the situation so that the time of designing, project approval, construction, commissioning, development to the level of combat use will significantly exceed the extended life of modern aircraft in 8 years. And most importantly, in our aviation industry, there is already a huge reserve for vertical and short take-off aircraft. My opinion is that when the Russian aircraft carrier acquires real features, then aviation should be raised and training pilots started. We succeed just, and maybe the first generation will have to see off to retirement. Let's look at the world with open eyes!
                  1. 0
                    11 January 2013 02: 41
                    Hello, Sasha! Here you are probably right, only when the time comes, then there will be no one to prepare pilots .... And that means planes and pilots are needed right now .... Maybe I'm wrong, of course ...
  4. zemlyak
    +1
    10 January 2013 15: 17
    Quote: olp
    we have only one aircraft carrier, Kuznetsov, just for him all these machines are designed
    Better late than not when. It took a long time to understand that on Kuznetsov Migi is preferable to Su.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"