135 years ago, the Russian army won the Battle of Shipka

40
Away from the Russian mother earth
Here you fell for the honor of the homeland dear,
You have brought an oath of allegiance to Russia
And remained faithful to the grave.
You have not kept the menacing ramparts,
Without fear went to battle the holy and right.
Sleep well, Russian eagles,
The descendants honor and remember your glory ...


poems on one of the plaques


135 years ago, Russian-Bulgarian troops won a victory over Shipka over the Turkish army of Vesil Pasha. At the beginning of 1878, the defense of Shipka was completed - one of the key and most famous episodes in the Russian-Turkish war of 1877 — 1878. The defense of Shipka bound the considerable forces of the Turkish army and provided the Russian troops with the shortest way to attack Constantinople. Shipka became the shrine of the Bulgarian patriots, since the Russian-Turkish war ended with the liberation of a significant part of Bulgaria from the Turkish yoke.

After crossing the Danube River and seizing bridgeheads, the Russian army could proceed to the next stage of the offensive — the transfer of Russian troops to the Balkan Mountains and a strike in the direction of Istanbul. The troops were divided into three detachments: Front, East (Ruschuksky) and West. The foremost - 10,5 thousand people, 32 guns under the command of Lieutenant General Iosif Vladimirovich Gurko, Bulgarian militiamen included in it, had to advance to Tarnovo, take the Shipka Pass, transfer part of the troops behind the Balkan Range, to South Bulgaria. 45-thousandth East and 35-thousandth Western units were to provide the flanks.

Gurko's troops acted quickly: June 25 (7 July) The advance detachment occupied the ancient Bulgarian capital, Tarnovo, and 2 (14) July crossed the Balkan Range through the hard-to-reach, but unguarded Khinkoi pass (located in 30 km east of Shipka). The Russians went to the rear of the Turks, who were guarding Shipka. Gurko's troops defeated Turkish troops near the village of Uflany and the city of Kazanlak and 5 (17) in July approached from the south to the Shipka Pass. Shipka defended 5-thousand. Turkish garrison under the command of Hulussi Pasha. On the same day, the pass attacked from the north a detachment of General Nikolay Svyatopolk-Mirsky, but failed. On July 6, the Gurko squad launched an offensive from the south, but also without success. However, Hulussi Pasha decided that the position of his troops was hopeless, and on the night from 6 to 7, July, he withdrew his troops along side roads to the city of Kalofer, leaving behind cannons. Shipka was immediately occupied by a detachment of Svyatopolk-Mirsky. Thus, the task of the vanguard was completed. The path to South Bulgaria was open, it was possible to attack Constantinople. However, there were no sufficient forces for an offensive in Zabalkanie, the main forces were connected with the siege of Pleven, and there were no reserves. Affected by the initial insufficient number of the Russian army.

The forward detachment Gurko was advanced to Nova Zagora and Stara Zagora. He had to take positions at this turn and close the approaches to the Shipka and Hainokoye passes. 11 (23) in July, Russian troops liberated Stara Zagora, and 18 (30) in July Nova Zagora. However, soon the 20-ths transferred from Albania came here. Corps of Suleiman Pasha, who was appointed commander of the Balkan army. Turkish troops immediately attacked, and 19 (31) July, a fierce battle took place near Stara Zagora. Russian soldiers and Bulgarian militia under the command of Nikolai Stoletov inflicted heavy damage on the enemy. But the forces were unequal, and the forward detachment was forced to retreat to the passes, where he became part of the troops of Lieutenant General Fyodor Radetsky (commander of the 8 corps).

135 years ago, the Russian army won the Battle of Shipka

Fedor Fedorovich Radetsky.

Shipka Defense

Shipka at that moment was part of the southern front of the Russian army, which was entrusted to guard the troops of General Radetsky (8, part of the 2, Corps, Bulgarian squads, only about 40 thousand people). They were stretched for 130 versts, and the reserve was located at Turnova. In addition to protecting the passes, the Radetzky troops had the task of providing the left flank against Pleven from the side of Lovchi and the right flank of the Ruschuksky detachment from Osman Bazar and Slivno. Forces were scattered by separate detachments, at Shipka initially there were only about 4 thousand soldiers of the Southern detachment under the command of Major General Stoletov (half left the Bulgarians) against the 60 camps (about 40 thousand) Turks Suleiman Pasha. The Shipka Pass went along the narrow spur of the main Balkan Range, gradually rising to the mountain of Sv. Nicholas (Shipka key position), from where the road steeply descended into the valley of Tundzhi. Parallel to this spur, separated from it by deep and partly wooded canyons, mountain ranges stretched from the east and west, which dominated the pass, but connected to it only in 2-3 places by more or less trails. The position occupied by the Russian troops was inaccessible, stretching a few miles to the depth, along an extremely narrow (25-30 fathoms) ridge, but could be subjected to a crossfire from neighboring dominant heights. However, due to its strategic importance, the pass needed to be held. Shipkina reinforcements included trenches in the 2 tier and 5 battery positions, rubble and wolf pit were built in the most important areas, mines were put. The process of equipment positions was far from complete.


Shipka Pass.

The Turkish command, given the important strategic importance of the pass, set the task before the troops of Suleiman Pasha to capture Shipka. Then Suleiman Pasha was to develop an offensive in the northern direction, to unite with the main forces of the Turkish army, which attacked Ruschuk, Shumlu and Silistra, defeat the Russian troops and throw them over the Danube. 7 August Suleiman Pasha's troops approached the village of Shipka. At this time, Radetzky, fearing that Turkish troops would pass into northern Bulgaria through one of the eastern aisles and strike Tyrnov, receiving alarming reports about the strengthening of Turkish troops against our troops near the cities of Helen and Zlataritsa (later it was revealed that the danger was exaggerated), 8 August sent there a general reserve. 8 August Sulemiman Pasha concentrated against the Russian troops on Shipka 28 thousand soldiers and 36 guns. At this time, Stoletov had only about 4 thousand people: the Orlov Infantry Regiment and the 5 Bulgarian squads with the 27 guns.

On the morning of August 9, the Turks opened artillery fire, taking up the Small Bedek mountain, east of Shipka. Then came the attacks of the Turkish infantry from the south and east, a fierce battle went on all day, but the Russians were able to repel the enemy onslaught. 10 August attacks were not, was guns and artillery firefight. The Turks, not taking Russian positions on the move, were preparing for a new decisive attack, while the Russians were strengthening. Radetsky, having received news of the enemy offensive, moved a reserve to the Shipka - the 4 Infantry Brigade, he headed it. In addition, another brigade was stationed at Shipka from Selvi (she arrived at 12). At dawn 11 August came a critical moment, the Turks again went on the attack. By this time, our troops had already suffered great damage, and by noon the ammunition began to come to an end. The attacks of the Turks followed one after the other; by 10 hours, Russian positions were swept from three sides, in 2 hours the Circassians even went to the rear, but were rejected. In 17 hours, Turkish troops attacking from the west side captured the so-called Side Hill, and the threat of a breakthrough in the central part of the position appeared. The situation was almost hopeless when the 7 th infantry battalion, which Radetsky had planted on Cossack horses, appeared on the 16-2 man on a horse, appeared on the 3 watch. The appearance of fresh forces and Radetzky inspired the defenders, and they were able to reject the Turks. The side slide was repulsed. Then came the rest of the 4-th infantry brigade and the onslaught of the enemy was repelled in all directions. Russian troops were able to keep Shipka. But the Turkish troops still had superiority and their combat positions were located only a few hundred steps from the Russians.


Protection of the “Eagle's Nest” by orlovtsy and Bryants 12 of August 1877 of the year (Popov A.N., 1893).

On the night of August 12, reinforcements led by Major General Mikhail Dragomirov arrived at the pass (2 Brigade of the 14 Infantry Division). Ammunition, food and water were brought. Under the command of Radetsky, up to 14,2, thousands of people with 39 guns, he decided to go on the offensive the next day. He planned to knock down the Turkish forces from two heights of the western ridge - the so-called Forest Hill and Bald Mountain, from where the enemy had the most convenient approaches to the Russian position and even threatened its rear. However, at dawn, Turkish troops again went on the offensive, striking the center of the Russian positions, and at lunchtime and on Mount St. Nicholas. Turkish attacks were repulsed in all directions, but the Russian counterattack on Lesnaya Kurgan was not a success. The 13 (25) of August, the Russians resumed the attacks on the Forest Mound and Lysa Mountain, Radetsky by this time received more reinforcements - the Volynsky Regiment with a battery. Suleiman Pasha by this time significantly strengthened his left flank, so the stubborn battle for these positions went on all day. Russian troops were able to knock down the enemy from the Forest mound, but could not capture Bald Mountain. The Russian troops retreated to the Forest mound and here during the night and morning of 14 th fought off enemy attacks. All Turkish attacks were repelled, but the Stoletov detachment suffered so significant losses that, without receiving reinforcements, it was forced to leave the Forest Mound, retreating to the Side Hill.


The vanguard of the 4 Infantry Brigade of Major General A.I. Tsvetsinsky hurries to Shipka.

In six days of fighting at Shipka, the Russians lost up to 3350 people (including 500 Bulgarians), i.e. virtually all of the original garrison, including generals Dragomirov (was seriously wounded in the leg), Derozhinsky (killed), 108 officers. Turkish losses were higher - about 8 thousand people (according to other data - 12 thousand). As a result, the Russian troops were able to win a strategic victory - a breakthrough of the Turkish troops through the pass and their decisive offensive against one of the flanks of the stretched disposition of the Russian army would not only force the rest to retreat, but could lead to cutting them off from the Danube. Particularly dangerous was the position of the detachment of Radetsky, the most distant from the Danube. Even the question was raised about the withdrawal of the Radetsky forces and the cleansing of the Shipka Pass, but then it was decided to strengthen the pass garrison. In tactical terms, the position of our troops on the pass was still difficult, they were captured by the enemy from three sides, and autumn and in winter even more deteriorated.



National Park Museum at the Shipka Pass. "Steel" battery.

"Shipka seat"

From 15 (27) August, the Shipka Pass was defended by the 14 Infantry Division and the 4 Infantry Brigade, under the command of Major General Mikhail Petrushevsky. Orlovsky and Bryansk regiments, as those who suffered the greatest losses, were taken to the reserve, and the Bulgarian militia were transferred to the village of Green Tree to take a path through the Imitli pass, bypassing Shipka from the west. The defenders of the Shipka Pass, doomed to passive defense, from this point on were most concerned about strengthening their positions and their settlement. Built closed passages posts with rear.

The Turks also carried out fortification work, strengthening their battle formations, and carried out constant gun-and-gun shelling of Russian positions. From time to time they made fruitless attacks on the village of Green-Tree and Mount St. Nicholas. 5 (17) September, at 3 hours of the night, Turkish troops launched a strong attack from the southern and western sides. Initially, they were successful, they were able to capture the so-called. The Eagle's Nest is a rocky and precipitous cape, outstanding in front of the mountain of Sts. Nicholas. But then the Russians counterattacked and, after a desperate hand-to-hand fight, they rejected the enemy. An enemy strike from the west, from the side of the Forest mound, was also repelled. After this, there were no serious attacks. The fighting was limited to shootouts. 9 November Wessel Pasha attacked the mountain of St. Nicholas, but very unfortunate, because the blow was repulsed with heavy losses for the Turkish troops.


Snow trenches (Russian positions on the Shipka Pass). V.V. Vereshchagin.

Soon the Russian soldiers had to pass a serious exam, which was held by nature. The position of the troops on Shipka became extremely difficult with the onset of winter, the frosts and blizzards on the mountain tops were particularly sensitive. From mid-November, fierce frosts and frequent snow storms began, the number of people getting sick and frosting on some days reached 400 people, the sentinels simply were blown away. Thus, the three regiments of the arrived 24 division were literally mowed down with disease and frostbite. During the period from September 5 to December 24, 1877 of the Shipnikin detachment, combat losses amounted to about 700 people killed and wounded, and sick people - up to 9,5 thousands.



Battle of Shane's 26 - 28 December 1877 of the Year (7 - 9 January 1878 g.)

The last act of battle for Shipka attack the positions of the Turkish troops on the road from the mountains of St.. Nicholas to the village Shipka (the battle of Sheinovo). After the fall of Plevna in November 28 (December 10), the number of Radetzky troops was brought to 45 thousand people. However, even in these conditions, the attack of heavily fortified positions of Wessel Pasha (he had about 30 thousand people) was risky.

It was decided to attack the vast Turkish camp in the valley against the Shipka Pass in two columns, which were supposed to make a detour: 19-thousand. Eastern column under the leadership of Svyatopolk-Mirsky, through the Trevnensky Pass and 16-thousand. Western column under the command of Mikhail Skobelev, through the Imitli pass. Under the leadership of Radetsky, about 10-11 thousand people remained, they remained on Shipkinsk positions. The columns of Skobelev and Svyatopolk-Mirsky were made on December 24, both columns encountered great difficulties, overcoming the snowy debris, had to leave almost all the artillery. On December 26, the column of Svyatopolk-Mirsky descended to the southern side of the mountains, the main forces took up positions near the village of Gusovo. Skobelev's column, in addition to natural obstacles, faced the Turkish troops, occupying the heights dominating the southern descent, which had to be occupied with a battle. Avant-garde Skobelev only by the evening of December 26 was able to reach the village of Imitliya, and the main forces were still on the pass.

On the morning of December 27, Svyatopolk-Mirsky launched an attack on the eastern front of the Turkish camp. The camp was about 7 versts in a circle and consisted of 14 redoubts that had trenches in front and in between. By 1 one o'clock in the afternoon Russian troops seized the first line of Turkish fortifications in this direction. Part of the forces of Svyatopolk-Mirsky occupied Kazanlak, blocking the route of the retreat of the Turkish troops to Adrianople. The troops of the western column 27-go continued to shoot down the Turks from the dominant heights and because of the insignificance of forces that crossed the mountains, Skobelev did not dare to launch an offensive. In the morning of the 28, the Turks launched a counteroffensive against the eastern column, but were driven back, the Russians captured Shipka and several fortifications. A further attack on the column of Svyatopolk-Mirsky was impossible, because the attack had not yet begun on Skobelev’s side, and the troops suffered heavy losses and spent most of the ammunition.



Radetzky, having received a report from Svyatopolk-Mirsky, decided to hit the front of the Turkish positions and pull some of the Turkish forces back on him. At 12 hours of the day, the 7 battalions descended from the mountain of Sts. Nicholas, but further progress, along a narrow and icy road, under heavy enemy rifle and artillery fire, led to such high losses that the Russian troops, having reached the front line of enemy trenches, were forced to retreat. However, this attack diverted considerable forces of the Turkish army and artillery, which could not be used for a counterattack against the troops of Svyatopolk-Mirsky and Skobelev.


Battle at Shipka-Sheinovo 28 December 1877 of the year (Kivshenko A.D., 1894).

Radetsky did not know that in the 11 watch, Skobelev launched his attack, directing the main attack against the south-western part of the enemy positions. Soon his forces broke into the middle of the fortified camp. At the same time, the column of Svyatopolk-Mirsky resumed. Around 3 hours Wessel Pasha, convinced of the impossibility of further resistance and retreat, decided to capitulate. Troops that held positions in the mountains also received orders to surrender. Only part of the Turkish cavalry was able to escape.

As a result of the battle at Shainovo, the Russian troops lost about 5,7 thousand people. The Army of Wessel Pasha ceased to exist, only prisoners were about 23 thousand people, also captured 93 guns. This victory had important consequences - in fact, the shortest way to Adrianople and Constantinople was opened. So ended the battle for Shipka.

The defense of Shipka is still one of the symbols of the strength and courage of the Russian soldiers. For Bulgaria, the name Shipka is a shrine, since this was one of the main battles that brought freedom to the Bulgarian people after the almost five-century Ottoman yoke.


"Big" Russian monument on Shipka.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    10 January 2013 09: 02
    GLORY TO SPRINGES!
  2. +10
    10 January 2013 09: 26
    A wonderful story of the glorious Russian army!
    It is a pity that the Bulgarians themselves forgot about this.
    1. mnn_12
      +17
      10 January 2013 12: 11
      Bulgarians have not forgotten. All these monuments would not be sitting if the Bulgarians had forgotten - on Shipka the complex of such monuments is intact. The main monument on Shipka was not shown here. Despite more than 20 years of anti-Russian propaganda and the complete absence of Russian opposition to this front, Bulgarian children in schools teach and know about Shipka, about Stoletov (today the mountains have an ego name).
      There is a wonderful Russian church in Shipka.
      Another thing is that the political situation is such that a lot of people in the West in Bulgaria and in Russia itself really want very much that Shipka would be forgotten ... but here it’s not about that
      1. +2
        10 January 2013 23: 02
        If Bulgarian children are still taught this, then this, of course, is wonderful. And try to ask our students whether many of them even know what Shipka is and where it is, not that some details.
        1. mnn_12
          +3
          11 January 2013 00: 30
          This is not the worst. Let’s take it that the history of Russia is so rich that it’s impossible at school everyone will say. This is quite understandable. But I am very concerned when, for example, I meet a lot of people (under 30 probably) who confidently and competently talk about how Bulgaria fought against the USSR in the Second World War. In my opinion, a systematic and systematic company is trying to alienate and litter the two nations, making it so that we forgot all the good things that were not only in the period after the Second World War, but also in distant periods of history.
  3. borisst64
    +13
    10 January 2013 09: 59
    Shipka is a sacred word for Bulgarians. And they call Russians - bros. We don’t pay attention to the goats, in every nation they come across.
    1. +1
      10 January 2013 13: 59
      "Brothers" almost unanimously voted for joining NATO !!! What? All ! Maybe it was not worth putting so many of our soldiers for the freedom of the ungrateful?
      1. mnn_12
        +9
        10 January 2013 14: 43
        According to this crazy logic, one can say that they unanimously voted for Mikhail Sergeyevich, Boris Nikolaevich, Yushchensko, Tymoshenko, that the weight of the Soviet people wanted the collapse of the USSR, and so on ...
        Think and read more before writing ...
      2. +2
        1 December 2016 20: 42
        Why did you lie? According to opinion polls 79-82% of the Bulgarians против joining NATO! Knowing this result, politicians refused to hold the referendum promised! There was no referendum!
  4. fenix57
    +8
    10 January 2013 11: 39
    This is a battle: "... As a result of the battle at Sheinovo, Russian troops lost about 5,7 thousand people. Wessel Pasha's army ceased to exist, only there were about 23 thousand prisoners, 93 guns were also captured ..." these are MILITARY LEADERS AND WARS.! GLORY to the Russian and Bulgarian people.
  5. mnn_12
    +9
    10 January 2013 12: 15
    And this is the Russian church in Shipka ...
    1. 0
      10 January 2013 18: 55
      In Soviet times, was there. Beauty. I was not in the church itself, only I was photographed nearby.
      1. mnn_12
        +1
        11 January 2013 00: 35
        There is now beauty. It is in very good condition, it is a tourist attraction and its golden domes can be looked far away. Before it was under the control of the Russian Orthodox Church. Now she is given to the Bulgarian Orthodox Church. When there were many visitors.
  6. +7
    10 January 2013 12: 16
    Glory to the Russian soldiers! Throughout history, they have saved entire nations! God grant that they should be remembered further!
  7. Kubanets
    +2
    10 January 2013 12: 24
    How did it happen that after shed so much blood for the liberation of the Slavic brothers, Russia lost its influence on Bulgaria (the exception is the Soviet period)? The incompetence of foreign policy or the short memory of the liberated? And today's Bulgaria in NATO (certainly not against Russia) the gratitude of descendants?
    1. mnn_12
      +10
      10 January 2013 12: 34
      Politicians Kubanets, politicians! Do you know, for example, where Mikhail Sergeyevich lives now and who pays him money? Do not forget the other conceptual figure - Boris Nikolaevich.
      Politicians are capable of destroying the results of the most remarkable victories on the battlefield.
      1. mamba
        +6
        10 January 2013 14: 39
        Quote: mnn_12
        Politicians are capable of destroying the results of the most remarkable victories on the battlefield.

        And they did it. At the Berlin Congress, the so-called The Berlin treatise, which radically changed the San Stefan treaty, mainly in favor of Austria-Hungary, to the detriment of the interests of the Balkan Slavs.
        Despite a complete victory in this war, Russia remained a political loser, although it returned the southern part of Bessarabia, lost after the Crimean War, and annexed the Kars region. The positions of Russia in the Balkans, won in the battles of 1877-1878. At the cost of the lives of more than 100 thousand Russian soldiers, they were undermined by the liturgies of the Berlin Congress. Russia did not manage to reach the straits, and its influence in the Balkans did not become stronger, as the Berlin Congress divided Bulgaria, Montenegro seized, transferred Bosnia and Herzegovina to Austria-Hungary, and even quarreled Serbia with Bulgaria.
        The performance of Austria-Hungary against the San Stefano treaty and the Bismarck brokering unfriendly towards Russia worsened the traditionally friendly Russian-Austrian and Russian-German relations.
        Foreign historiography portrays this war as a clash of two barbarities - Turkish and Russian, and Western powers - as civilized peacekeepers who have always helped the Balkan peoples fight against the Turks with intelligent means; and when the war broke out, they stopped the beating of Turkey by Russia and saved the Balkans from Russian rule.
        As for Turkish historiography, it is saturated with chauvinism: the yoke of Turkey in the Balkans gives out for progressive guardianship, the national liberation movement of the Balkan peoples - for the inspiration of European powers, and all the wars that the Brilliant Porta waged in the XVIII-XIX centuries, including the war of 1877-1878 gg., - for self-defense against aggression of Russia and the West.
        1. mnn_12
          +4
          10 January 2013 15: 40
          Est and another mamba,
          Unfortunately, many of the Russian politicians of the Tago time were also on top. Here, they often asked the question how did it get so that Bulgaria fought against Russia in the First World War. But such problems. When the Bulgarian state was created, the Bulgarians wanted a monarch from Russia, from the Russian aristocracy. But there they offered a completely unacceptable person - crazy. As a result, the monarchs in Bulgaria became people from Austria-Hungary, pursuing of course interests that have nothing to do with Russian enteres.
          1. mamba
            +1
            10 January 2013 15: 57
            Quote: mnn_12
            When the Bulgarian state was created, the Bulgarians wanted a monarch from Russia, from the Russian aristocracy.

            I have not heard about this. If possible, in more detail, please.
            If this is indeed so, then it turns out that among the Bulgarian aristocracy there was no candidate for the kingdom, even a compromise?
            1. mnn_12
              +4
              10 January 2013 17: 11
              The Bulgarians did not have aristocracy after 500 years of Ottoman rule, and in those years the vast majority of the states were monarchies. And the main task of the new state was to find the monarch. He was not interested in the details of the story, but Batenberg (the first Bulgarian prince after the liberation of Bulgaria) was chosen after an extremely unacceptable candidacy from Russia. As a result, a lot was lost. In Bulgaria began long battles between Russophiles and pro-Western forces. What was won on the battlefield was easily lost at the diplomatic and political level.
              Mashchaba disparate eras are different but the analogies with the Second World War and perestroika are striking.
              1. Marek Rozny
                +2
                10 January 2013 22: 07
                And there are no descendants of Asparuh? Where did this branch go?
                1. mnn_12
                  0
                  11 January 2013 00: 44
                  This branch was simply lost and disappeared for several centuries in the sea of ​​Slavic peoples, and the most unsuccessful proof is that we are now speaking the Slavic language. All that remains is separate words in the Bulgarian language. This is a simple truth. Everything else is political speculation and insinuations.
              2. mamba
                0
                10 January 2013 22: 42
                Quote: mnn_12
                Batenberg was chosen after an extremely unacceptable candidate from Russia.

                So who did Russia offer to the kingdom in Bulgaria? Feel free to call this person.
                1. mnn_12
                  +1
                  11 January 2013 00: 49
                  Dear Mamba,
                  I’m not shy, I just forgot this item when I read it. No, now I have the opportunity to throw efforts on this, since I am not a professional historian. If this interests you, check and tell me, it would be interesting to remember too.
                  1. mamba
                    +1
                    11 January 2013 11: 28
                    On the creation of the 3rd Bulgarian kingdom, I found something. Details can be found at http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/History/Mon_Evr/25.php
                    In 1879, the Great National Assembly (Parliament) adopted the Tarnovo Constitution, which proclaimed Bulgaria a constitutional monarchy. On the recommendation of Emperor Alexander II, the Bulgarian throne was occupied by the German prince Alexander Batenberg, son of the Hessian prince Alexander, general of the Austrian service, nephew of Maria Alexandrovna, wife of Alexander III. Little prepared for government activities, possessing only the horizons of an officer of the Prussian army, the young monarch was not able to establish himself in Bulgarian society.
                    In the summer of 1886, Prince Batenberg was overthrown as a result of a conspiracy of officers - supporters of Russia. But Prime Minister Stambolov organized a counter-coup and urged Batenberg to return. Despite the enthusiasm of his opponents of Russian influence in the country, under the threat of a clash with Russia, on September 7, 1886, Prince Alexander was forced to capitulate.

                    Perhaps it was him that you had in mind.
                    The political crisis was resolved in July 1887, when Parliament elected Ferdinand of Coburgotte, the candidate of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, as Prince. He was the son of Prince Augustus of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Major General of the Austrian Army, and Princess Mary Clementine of Orleans, daughter of King Philip of Lunes. Ferdinand's paternal uncles were King Fernando II of Portugal and Prince Albert, the husband of Queen Victoria of England, and he was a great-nephew of King Leopold I of Belgium. The European capitals did not object to Ferdinand's accession to the Bulgarian throne, if it was approved by Alexander III. The latter, however, had the impression of the German prince as a frivolous rake: "His nomination as a candidate for the throne is as comical as the nomination itself is comical."
                    After the first communication with Ferdinand, Prime Minister Stambolov told his entourage: "Bulgaria is just a decoy duck for him." The prince considered the received throne, first of all, as an opportunity for personal elevation to the level of monarchs of the leading European powers.
                    Russian diplomat Prince G. N. Trubetskoy testified: "Ferdinand does not like his people. He did not hesitate to speak contemptuously about him, and I personally had to hear such comments from him ... Bulgarians were afraid of him, no one loved him."
                    Until 1894, the country was led by the Prime Minister of Istanbul. His government pursued an anti-Russian authoritarian policy, which was not to the liking of Ferdinand himself, who was looking for ways to draw closer to the Russian emperor. Using the discontent of Russian supporters, the Bulgarian prince dismissed Stambolov. The prince needed the elimination of Russophobe Stambolov in order to enter into negotiations with Russia and achieve there, and thereafter, in the capitals of other great powers his official recognition. This Ferdinand succeeded only after hard-won consent to the demand of St. Petersburg that the successor to the throne Boris, Prince Tarnovsky, should convert to Orthodoxy (Ferdinand and his wife Maria Louise were zealous Catholics). Thus, he established his authority and on 6 October 1908 proclaimed himself king of Bulgaria Ferdinand I.
                    Significant are the words of Stambolov, uttered by him on his deathbed: "The Bulgarian people will forgive all my sins. But they will never forgive me that I have elevated Coburg to the Bulgarian throne."
                    1. mnn_12
                      0
                      11 January 2013 21: 08
                      Perhaps it was him that you had in mind.

                      No mamba, didn’t have this mind. This was before Batenberg’s choice, or more likely, if he had in mind what you found after Batenberg. The name sounded to me somehow Georgian, but I can’t remember. Well, if you want to take Batenberg as an example. The fact that you found the fullness is confirmed by my thesis - Russian politicians were frivolous and short-sighted in their choice of a new monarch. And the result was not late. So much has been lost for Russia. For Bulgaria, of course not, we were the main winners from this victory.
            2. 0
              11 January 2013 18: 32
              When the war was preparing, Russia had one problem — it would not allow a repeat of 1856 — a war with all of Europe. Agreed with Auto-Hungary and England:
              1. As the war ended, the final decision belongs to all the Great States in Europe. (This is why the agreement in San Staffano is acceptable)
              2. A large Slavic state will not be created in the Balkans.
              The Berlin Congress in the summer of 1878 revised the contract to the detriment of Bulgaria and Russia. He split the Bulgarian people. Often he gave land to Serbia and Rumania, others returned to the Ottoman Empire. Bulgaria became the "Principality of Bulgaria" headed by the prince, he does not need to belong to any of the big dynasties ruling in Europe-Romnovi, Gbsburgi, Gonzollern and so on. Obviously, Russia had its own candidate and he got the go-ahead to Berlin-Alexander Battenberg. He was born in the Grand Duke of Hesse-Darmschat. His father is a general serving Russia and Austria. He had a kinship relationship with both Alexander II and Queen Victoria of England. This compromise suited all countries that signed the Berlin Treaty. PP Sorry, I can't write hoposho in Russian !!
          2. +2
            11 January 2013 23: 47
            After the overthrow of Aleksadar Batemberg, the so-called coup d'état officer - Russophiles on 8/9 .08.1886, Bulgaria urgently needed to find the prince. Wishing to maintain its relationship with the Liberators, the Bulgarian National Assembly took Voldemar the Danish-relative Emperor Alexander II. The tsar all-Russian advised Valdemar to refuse ... Then Russia offered the Georgians Nikolai Mingreli, he sold the principality of Russia to his own and lived off the Russian money ... There were no people in Bulgaria, even Russia's closest friends took on the likeness of a monarch .. Then in 1887 Ferdinand appeared ... and Russia itself has the blame for it too! Too much she thought that the Bulgarians would agree on everything that she wanted from them ...
            1. mnn_12
              0
              12 January 2013 01: 44
              Thanks for the information, I did not know these details. This shows well how this paradox turned out that in World War I Russia and Bulgaria were in opposition.
            2. mamba
              +1
              12 January 2013 13: 05
              Quote: bagatura
              Then Russia proposed the Georgians Nikolai Mingreli

              Finally, the same person appeared, about whom the respected mnn_12. Here is what we managed to find on it. After the overthrow of Batemberg, the nomination by Alexander III of a new candidate for the Bulgarian throne - the Georgian Prince Nikolai Mingreli, perplexed even the most convinced Russophiles, and the deputies of the Great National Assembly refused to elect Mingreli as the Bulgarian prince. Nikolai Mingreli, although a prince, but only in Georgia there are more princes than shoemakers. In addition, the memory of battles with the Turkish army, in which there were many Caucasians, was still fresh.
              Soon, the Danish prince Voldemar, the youngest son of King of Denmark Christian IX and his wife Louise of Hesse-Kassel, was proclaimed ruler of the country. Among his brothers and sisters were King of Denmark Frederick VIII, King of Greece George I, Queen of Great Britain Alexandra, Russian Empress Maria Fedorovna and Princess Tira. But Voldemar, at the insistence of Alexander III and of his own free will, refused to take such an unstable place.
              Alexander III believed that it was necessary to appoint to the Bulgarian throne a person sufficiently well-known in the country and energetic. One who will artificially seek both an increase in land, in the spirit of San Stefano, and secretly, but actively, prepare the liberation of Constantinople.
              Part of the Bulgarian elite considered that St. Petersburg was excessively interfering in the internal affairs of the country. They feared the threat of independence emanating from recent liberators. In November 1886, eight and a half years after San Stefano - Bulgaria broke off relations with Russia.
              Then the 26-year-old Austrian hussar lieutenant Ferdinand Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was elected prince. Owing to this political leapfrog, the inevitable drift of the Bulgarian government in the person of Ferdinand towards a policy less oriented towards Russia began. The position of the Germanophile party in the country significantly increased. Russia for a long time lost one of its faithful allies in the Balkans.
              More details can be read here: http://genrogge.ru/bulgaria/bulg1-2.htm
              1. mnn_12
                0
                13 January 2013 03: 28
                Dear Mamba,
                Thanks for the valuable information. I admit all these details I did not know. They confirm that Russian politicians and diplomats made at least 2 fatal mistakes (Batenberg and Mingrelli) after the liberation of the country from which, of course, the rivals of Russia crawled.
                1. +1
                  13 January 2013 12: 25
                  And why did Batetenberg become a mistake? I do not quite agree ... he suited the Bulgarians well, he liked him ... True, what aristocrat wanted to have more power, but it is impossible to call him a bad ruler. He came as a prince at the age of 22 .. he didn't understand much from a big politician .... Rossi's wine here is very great, she wanted to keep the prince and the state on a cart ... irrevocable obedience !!! When Alexander I Batenberg showed that he had his own understanding from the Bulgarian interest he became an "enemy of Russia" ... The conflict had several stages ... I will try to explain to you.
                  He considered the so-called Tarnovsk constitution, was imposed from Russia too democratic (half-republican as he said) and it is so ... Russia correctly believed that the support of its influence is the people, and wanted to limit the power of the monarch. The prince asked Alexander II dates to change, the emperor is redeemed, but only if it becomes according to the laws. In Bulgaria, the majority stood for the constitution and the prince temporarily reconciled ... But, nevertheless, he wanted to change the basic law. He made it the so-called "regime of power" 1881-1883. The constitution was suspended, the prince received the right to rule with a decree (having given force to the laws). Then, more than 60 laws were passed, which became the basis of the state. Honestly, the prince of soritsa did not want to be with Russia, but his opponent was pecking and saying that he was the enemy of the empire. Unfortunately, Russia pecked on this ... and beginning to think about the overthrow of Alexander I and his replacement ... Each action, having strengthened the prince’s position, was already seen as a threat to Russian interest in the Balkans. September 6, 1885 there was a reunion of the Principality of Bulgaria and the so-called East Rumelia (autonomous region in recent Southern Bulgaria created by Berlin peacekeepers in 1878) ... For the amazement of the Bulgarians, Russia opposed and recalled its officer from the Bulgarian army ... Eto in my opinion forcibly undermined her position ... England immediately crawled and supported the violation of the Berlin Treaty by the Bulgarians. I was pushed from Austria-Hungary with the tacit approval of Russia 2.XI.1885 Serbia attacked Bulgaria, she wanted "compensation" - a part of the western Bulgarian lands, the capital should stat Plovdiv ... This is the worst, two Slavic, Orthodox people became mortal enemies for the joy of the Germans ... Serbs believed that the war would be a walk, the king of Milan said that there would be a "white coffee" pit near the Sofia charshia (shopping street). For what the Bulgarians lacked for everything, the officers were 20-26 years old guys, the rank was no longer the captain. The war was called “war to the captains”. Worse, I’m mainly Bulgarian, I’ve stood at the border with Turkey that the Serbs attacked, no one thought. But ... it became the other way around, while they walked slowly to Sofia, reinforcements came from the south at a frantic pace, took 80-90 km a day ... On November 5,6-7 and 14, the Serbs were beaten headlong at Slivnitsa (western Sofia), XNUMX- Thirteen Pirot fell, and then the Austrians went that they would save the vassals ... The success of the connection strengthened the position of the prince .... But in the old days, a confrontation began - "Russophiles" - they said (without the prince and from Russia) and "Russophobia (without Russia and with the prince) and then there was a coup about which he already wrote ... Opponents of Russian intervention went on the counter-coup wanted to return the prince, but he made a mistake, asked Alexander III for approval .... And he replied that "I cannot approve of our stay in such a badly affected country ... !!!" This is a fatal mistake - the prince was overthrown, without having an idea even with whom to change ... Then the prince’s adherence was rejected from him, just as from the prayer of anybody, what was knzam bjl ??? After the refusal of the Bulgarians, Mingreli was accepted, as he wrote, RUSSIA WITHDRAWN ITS DIPLOMTI FROM BULGARIA !!! Mr. Bolgar, tore off the relationship with the Liberator, and did not strike my head ... so it turned out that the Bulgarians - "without a prince and without Russia" ... And then the question of the new monarch of a hundred life and death .... the princes directly threatened the independence of the country ... And in 1887 who had interest brought the Bulgarians to Ferdinanad ...
                  1. mnn_12
                    +1
                    13 January 2013 18: 14
                    And why did Battenberg become a mistake? I do not quite agree ...

                    And you have to agree:
                    He arrived as a prince at the age of 22

                    What life, political and diplomatic experience in your opinion can a person have about 22 years old? And such a person was put on such a responsible position. There is no room for argument! The stupidity and frivolity with which the brilliant victories in 1877-78 were lost by the Russian politician and diplomat are simply stunning. I still did not know these details.
                    About the connection - Batenberg was told - reinforce or leave!
                    1. 0
                      13 January 2013 18: 25
                      He didn’t have a choice ... nothing to lose from him .. Nobody put an ultimatum on him, put before the fact-case already been used ... It remains only to accept hopes for good luck .. that Russia will be against that Serbia attacked. ..no one thought ...
      2. +1
        11 January 2013 23: 11
        Quote: mnn_12
        Politicians are capable of destroying the results of the most remarkable victories on the battlefield.

        What is true is true ...
  8. nnkfrschk
    +1
    10 January 2013 12: 25
    Wonderful article!
  9. AK-47
    +5
    10 January 2013 14: 04
    ... 16 thousand Western column under the command of Mikhail Skobelev, through the Imitli Pass ...

    A small square in front of the current Moscow City Hall (Tverskaya, 13) in 1912 was renamed Skobelevskaya in connection with the erection of a monument to the general, the hero of Shipka and Plevna Mikhail Skobelev. The monument was demolished in 1918 in order to erect the obelisk of the Constitution. In general, the general predecessor of Yuri Dolgoruky in this place was General Skobelev.
    1. atomic
      +1
      10 January 2013 14: 55
      AK-47, you always make interesting photos. Thank you.
  10. Blackwing
    +3
    10 January 2013 14: 21
    Thanks to the author for the article. All brothers Slavs Merry Christmas! Do not forget the exploits of our ancestors!
  11. dmb
    +2
    10 January 2013 17: 26
    Speaking about the feat of ancestors, one should not forget that in addition to heroism, there is also competent conduct of military operations. Can someone explain the ratio of combat losses to the number of cases. Or brave generals, waving sabers, forgot that in the mountains there is snow in winter. So it seems that they came not from Zulussia, but from Russia. And do not blame everything on the lack of military medicine. It was precisely in the Russian army at that time that it was the most advanced. Moreover, to prevent frostbite, not only a doctor is needed, but a sheepskin coat and felt boots. I haven’t read anything about frozen generals anywhere.
    1. Marek Rozny
      +1
      10 January 2013 22: 05
      Besides the fact that there was a good medical service in the Russian army, then a new chip appeared - telegraph operators. The operational command and control of the troops has improved significantly. Below I gave the info on the head of the army telegraph.
      As for the "sudden" winter, I can assume that it really turned out to be sudden, in the sense that it is much colder than the usual winter in that region. Sometimes it happens. Itself this winter already froze in the steppe at -45 degrees.
  12. AK-47
    +3
    10 January 2013 17: 59
    Uniforms of various units and ranks of the Russian army during the Balkan War


    Russian medal for the lower ranks for the war of 1877-8.
  13. asf32wesdg
    -1
    10 January 2013 18: 35
    It just can't be !!! The FSB has created this http://sho.rtlink.de/FS62Am database about any resident of Russia, Ukraine and other CIS countries. Really was really scared
    there are a lot of interesting things about me (addresses, phone numbers, even my photos of a different nature) - I wonder where they dug up this. In general, there are good sides - this
    Information can be deleted from the site.
    I advise you to hurry, you never know how to fumble there ...
  14. Marek Rozny
    +3
    10 January 2013 21: 58
    Recently, the question of the participation of Kazakhs in Russian wars was discussed. Few people know that it was during the Russian-Turkish war of 1877-1878 that almost modern communications troops appeared in the Russian army - the first telegraphists commanded by the Kazakh cavalry general, Gubaidulla Zhangirov (also known by the name of Genghis Khan). Genghisides, a descendant of the Khan of the Bukeev Horde (another Kazakh horde, abolished in imperial time)
    In 1877, all telegraphs were subordinate to him - both in the theaters of war and those operating in the rear of the army. In 1878, for the distinction in service, he was promoted to major general. For bravery and personal courage during the hostilities near Plevna and for the good news reported personally to the emperor about the capture of the Grivitsky redoubt by the Russians, he was bestowed by the sovereign with a golden saber with the inscription “For courage”.
    In addition to the golden checker, Genghis Khan was awarded all Russian orders - up to Anna I degree inclusive and many foreign.
    Later he was the head of the telegraph department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
    In the Moscow Kremlin, his last name is carved on the white marble wall in the St. George Hall.
  15. +1
    11 January 2013 18: 58
    Here it is - Bulgaria under the Treaty of San Stefano! What is left, everyone knows ... Russia did not have a field of diplomatic maneuvers, either agree on the terms on which it is possible to fight with Turkey on the consent of the Great Powers uchitavat their interests, or a new Antrosian coalition of the model 1853-1856 will receive. !!! Russia had a pre-war treaty with Austria-Hungary and England ... that there would be no big Slavic power in the Balkans and the terms of peace would be agreed upon by all the great powers after the end of the war with Turkey. That was the summer of 1878 in Berlin. The Berlin Treaty categorically forbade the prince of Bulgaria to become a representative of a large dynasty from Europe. But the candidate of Russia, Alexander Batenberg, received the "Good". The dismemberment of Bulgaria was practically inevitable ... Roissia took Dobrudzha (the colobel of the Bulgarian state in 681) and gave it to Rumania in exchange for Bessarabia. That is why now the Balkan Slavs do not have a border with their brothers from Ukraine and Russia. PPV Sorry, I can't write in Russian)))

    And UTB split Bulgaria .... The struggle for national unity did not have time, and the blame for UTB have the mediocrity of the losers lost in the Balkan war ... This is another topic!

    I made a mistake, I involuntarily changed the photo ... The difference is visible, I think it will be clear to everyone!