Military Review

State tests of the 152-mm self-propelled artillery mount "Coalition-SV" have been completed

70
State tests of the 152-mm self-propelled artillery mount "Coalition-SV" have been completed

The newest Russian self-propelled artillery unit "Coalition-SV" of 152 mm caliber has completed state tests, confirming all the characteristics laid down by the developers. This was reported by the press service of the Rostec state corporation.


State tests of the Coalition-SV self-propelled gun have been successfully completed; in the near future, the artillery mount will begin to be delivered to the troops, since mass production of the complex began in advance, the state corporation decided not to wait for the end of the tests. Also, together with the self-propelled guns, the transport-loading vehicle also went into mass production.

The Rostec State Corporation has completed state tests of the 152-mm self-propelled artillery gun (SAO) "Coalition-SV", confirming the unique technical characteristics of the installation. The newest howitzer surpasses the best world and domestic models in terms of firing range and accuracy, as well as in the time it takes to solve combat missions

- the message says Rostec.

The 2C35 Coalition-SV self-propelled howitzer is designed to destroy command posts, communications centers, artillery and mortar batteries, and armored vehicles, including tanks, anti-tank weapons, air defense and missile defense systems, as well as manpower of a potential enemy. The shooting of the newest self-propelled gun is more automated and computerized; the howitzer can operate in the “Squall of Fire” mode, in which several shells fired from the gun at different angles simultaneously reach the target. The maximum firing range of a high-precision projectile is 80 km. The crew is in an isolated armored capsule.

The basis of firepower is a 2 mm 88A152 gun with a firing speed of more than 10 rounds per minute, which is higher than the firing speed of other artillery systems.
70 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aakvit
    aakvit 20 October 2023 09: 04
    +20
    It's time, it's time to use such a system against the Nazis and their hangers-on! The range of fire is decent, I hope the accuracy is also as it should be!
    1. Orange Bigg
      Orange Bigg 20 October 2023 09: 07
      +25
      The news is good. If only the ground-based Hermes would enter the troops faster. The destruction range of 100 km is just right for high-precision counter-battery warfare. That’s what is so lacking now.
    2. Peter1First
      Peter1First 20 October 2023 09: 37
      -18
      So, what do we have in the bottom line? 1. They started making self-propelled guns.... When else will they make at least 10 of them? “Soon” is a loose concept! 2. Do you already have ammunition for this self-propelled gun, or are they still going to make them? 3. Will they also make TZM “soon”? 4. Will training of artillery crews take time? In total, this “soon” will stretch for another six months...
      1. Orange Bigg
        Orange Bigg 20 October 2023 09: 48
        +9
        Well, how would the Coalition-SV self-propelled guns pass the tests without ammunition?

        An excellent help in eliminating this backlog will be the start of large-scale production and delivery of promising self-propelled artillery systems 2S35 “Coalition-SV” to combat units of the missile forces and artillery of the Russian Federation. These self-propelled guns boast the presence of more advanced 152-mm 2A88 guns (52 calibers long) with a significantly higher maximum crushing pressure in the barrel. Considering the fact that During full-scale testing, the 2A88 gun provided a firing range of the latest active-rocket projectiles of about 60-70 km, the estimated range of the Krasnopol-D UAS can be 55-60 km, which will temporarily make it possible to achieve sustainable parity in artillery duels with 155 mm NATO guns adapted for the use of Excaliburs.


        https://topwar.ru/167399-dalnobojnyj-krasnopol-d-v-artillerijskih-dujeljah-s-zapadnymi-sau-stoit-li-ozhidat-triumfa.html
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 20 October 2023 11: 49
          +5
          Quote from Orange Bigg
          Well, how would the Coalition-SV self-propelled guns pass the tests without ammunition?

          Spawn this did not happen, and again the same. ©
          Remember the SU-100 - tests have passed, production has begun... but the self-propelled guns are not entering the active army - there is no mass production of shells.
          1. Captain Pushkin
            Captain Pushkin 20 October 2023 12: 36
            +3
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Remember the SU-100 - tests have passed, production has begun... but the self-propelled guns are not entering the active army - there is no mass production of shells.

            The SU-100 is a self-propelled gun based on the ballistics of the naval 100-mm B-34 gun of the 1940 model.
            The shells in 1944, at the time of the start of production of the SU-100, should have been...
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 20 October 2023 13: 15
              +4
              Quote: Captain Pushkin
              The SU-100 is a self-propelled gun based on the ballistics of the naval 100-mm B-34 gun of the 1940 model.
              The shells in 1944, at the time of the start of production of the SU-100, should have been...

              Yeah, there were... OFS. For tank destroyers - just right. laughing
              The naval B-24 and B-34 did not need BBS. On large pots, the B-34 was an anti-aircraft gun, and the BBS-ami there were already someone to leave. And small ships with B-24s simply would not survive next to opponents at whom the BBS needs to fire.
              The SU-100 was put into service in early July 1944. Serial self-propelled guns began to be produced in September. And serial BBS - only in November.
          2. max702
            max702 20 October 2023 21: 58
            -1
            So this is the saint of the USSR! Why are you saying that? Stalin would be wow for such things! But the reality is like this... There are always jambs everywhere.
      2. musorg
        musorg 20 October 2023 11: 56
        +3
        Don’t moan Petrukha, everything will be as good as ever!
      3. Berkut752
        Berkut752 20 October 2023 12: 44
        +5
        Peter1First (Peter), read more carefully, since mass production of the complex began IN ADVANCE.
      4. 1976AG
        1976AG 20 October 2023 13: 02
        +6
        Quote from: Peter1First
        So, what do we have in the bottom line? 1. They started making self-propelled guns.... When else will they make at least 10 of them? “Soon” is a loose concept! 2. Do you already have ammunition for this self-propelled gun, or are they still going to make them? 3. Will they also make TZM “soon”? 4. Will training of artillery crews take time? In total, this “soon” will stretch for another six months...


        The bottom line is... self-propelled guns were not “started to be made”, but adopted into service, this is a big difference! High-precision ammunition of 152 mm caliber. have been around for a long time and they have already been modernized taking into account the SVO. As for production, believe me, it is much easier to produce self-propelled guns than combat aircraft.
        1. bk0010
          bk0010 20 October 2023 18: 54
          +2
          Quote: 1976AG
          High-precision ammunition of 152 mm caliber. have been around for a long time and they have already been modernized taking into account the SVO.
          She has her own shells, the old ones don't fit.
          1. alexoff
            alexoff 21 October 2023 10: 33
            +2
            Her shells are ordinary, she has her own charges in the form of tablets. So separately loaded shells are suitable
      5. Glagol1
        Glagol1 21 October 2023 11: 11
        0
        Six months is not that long. It's really soon. Such weapons do not come at the snap of a finger. If there is decent target designation, armored trousers will not help the Nazis.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. teron
      teron 20 October 2023 09: 07
      +15
      The article is written about the end of state tests. And the fact that production began before the end of the tests was also mentioned.
      1. Alexey Lantukh
        Alexey Lantukh 20 October 2023 13: 53
        -3
        However, Russian realities. Less than ten years have passed since the start of production of the first samples!!! I suspect that they simply did not give money for this topic, especially since the self-propelled guns are complex with many related equipment. Well, now the roasted rooster has pecked in one place.
    2. Popandos
      Popandos 20 October 2023 09: 11
      +8
      So in the article it’s written in Russian in white
      Serial production of the complex began in advance; the state corporation decided not to wait for the end of testing
  3. Popandos
    Popandos 20 October 2023 09: 09
    -12
    "Coalition-SV" 152 mm caliber has completed state tests

    Completed it exactly, or as always?
    1. Saburov_Alexander53
      Saburov_Alexander53 20 October 2023 09: 25
      +5
      Without certification and trial operation? fellow . Maybe first sell the batch to foreign customers, let them try it at home... I looked on the Internet: Development began in 2002 in response to the existing art systems in NATO. Yes, no one imagined that they would have to fight NATO without nuclear weapons, hence the rush for a seemingly not very necessary weapon. There are missiles and “Tornado” with “Pinocchio”... but after Syria it was worth thinking about it and speeding up.
      All that remains is to return General Popov to the front, who openly spoke about the need for such weapons here and now, even without completing the entire bureaucratic procedure with admission to the troops.
  4. I dare to_notice_
    I dare to_notice_ 20 October 2023 09: 13
    +11
    Good news.
    Now it is necessary for another almost “state” to experience them.
    I hope these tests will also be successful.
  5. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 20 October 2023 09: 20
    +8
    Finally, we can be happy for our artillerymen who have the opportunity to conduct counter-battery combat with NATO howitzers. good
    1. Nexcom
      Nexcom 20 October 2023 09: 23
      +6
      The main thing is that now our artillery will have more of these Coalitions in the Northern Military District.
      So that our poops can be given a chance to poop......

      PS I wonder if the barbecues will be used for cooking on the tower? And in the photo there is a tower without a barbecue.
    2. stankow
      stankow 20 October 2023 10: 27
      +3
      Yeah, we were just waiting to fight... laughing Without the Coalition there is no way wink
  6. Woroshilow
    Woroshilow 20 October 2023 09: 22
    +2
    Am I the only one who thinks that the T-72 chassis (although the T-80 rollers) is not enough for this turret?
    1. Nexcom
      Nexcom 20 October 2023 09: 24
      +8
      I am amazed how you could see the skating rinks in the photo for the article from this angle.....
      1. SovAr238A
        SovAr238A 20 October 2023 21: 49
        0
        Quote: Nexcom
        I am amazed how you could see the skating rinks in the photo for the article from this angle.....

        Have you ever seen other photos of the Coalition?
        Where does such amazement come from?
      2. Podvodnik
        Podvodnik 20 October 2023 23: 08
        +3
        . How did you see the rollers in the photo for the article from this angle?


        Strabismus? wassat
    2. Yuri_I
      Yuri_I 20 October 2023 09: 38
      0
      And on the T72 the crew is in an isolated capsule?
    3. alexmach
      alexmach 20 October 2023 11: 55
      +1
      Am I the only one who thinks that the T-72 chassis (although the T-80 rollers) is not enough for this turret?

      no, similar opinions have already been expressed, including here... It was originally planned for the Armatov chassis, but not everything is going smoothly with the chassis.

      Where are the rollers from the T-80 from? It should seem to be unified with the T-90 at the Uralvagon base.
      1. Woroshilow
        Woroshilow 20 October 2023 16: 44
        +1
        I apologize, I mixed it up myself, I looked at another photo, there are just skating rinks from the eighty, but then it turned out that in the photo it’s Msta-S and not the Coalition.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 20 October 2023 09: 31
    +2
    Kyiv is a worthy target for 2 C35 "Coalition-SV".
    1. Nexcom
      Nexcom 20 October 2023 09: 36
      +5
      It’s better to hit the enemy’s warehouses, railway junctions, accumulations of equipment and manpower. Kyiv will surrender anyway if the Kaklo-Wehrmacht is completely crushed. And the MT base too.
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 20 October 2023 10: 27
        +1
        She needs a GLONASS-guided projectile. For such purposes.
  10. Stan017
    Stan017 20 October 2023 09: 36
    +2
    It’s a pity that artillery systems are no longer called by flower names.
    It was a very beautiful tradition.
  11. Galleon
    Galleon 20 October 2023 09: 43
    +4
    Such a weapon system requires its own target designation system: a conventional UAV will not work here; its action is 70-80 km beyond the limits of the radio horizon in the VHF range and, therefore, the limits of its range. For the most part, our UAVs operate up to 30-40 km. Of course, we won’t know much, but in this vivid example I would like to see the level of our military thought among those whose weapons are plans and maps.
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 20 October 2023 10: 27
      +3
      For this, the bourgeoisie use RC and BMLA aircraft such as Bayraktar and RIper.
    2. Garris199
      Garris199 21 October 2023 02: 57
      -1
      I would like to see the level of our military thought among those whose weapons are plans and maps.

      Haven't you seen enough in 1.5 years yet? For me, it is quite weak, at least without any zest.
    3. alexoff
      alexoff 21 October 2023 10: 37
      0
      Target designation at such ranges using Google maps, here is the train station, here is the warehouse. What to catch in Zaporozhye? And for counter-battery warfare it has a radar
  12. Archivist Vasya
    Archivist Vasya 20 October 2023 09: 48
    -7
    I wonder why the 2 air conditioners in front are having fun, because the thought that the frontal armor is stronger is that it won’t be scary?
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 20 October 2023 10: 26
      +4
      This is a radar... the projectile flies out and it’s immediately clear where it will land. Can be adjusted before the projectile falls.
  13. Sandor Clegane
    Sandor Clegane 20 October 2023 09: 52
    +1
    This couldn’t have come at a better time, I’ve been waiting for this for a long time! Now will make a good contribution in the combat zone!
    I wonder what the range is? Well, how quickly can the barrel be changed in the field?
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 20 October 2023 10: 25
      +3
      If the chassis is a tank, then I see no differences from MSTA S....and in the armies of the USSR and the Russian Federation there are certain standards such as 500 km.
  14. Hey
    Hey 20 October 2023 10: 13
    -7
    I believe that a projectile at maximum range will fly for about 1 minute. This means the enemy will have from 3 to 5 minutes. between shots so that s...sya. And again the question of reconnaissance and target designation for this system arises. And judging by some videos, the adjustment takes place according to the principle of bast left, bast, right.
    1. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 20 October 2023 13: 15
      +2

      And judging by some videos, the adjustment takes place according to the principle of paw left paw right


      Judging by some videos, our UAVs find targets and hit them with Tornado-S MLRS and loitering ammunition to the depth of enemy defenses at 50-60 km.

      We are seriously lacking a high-precision artillery shell, an analogue of Excalibur, flying 70 km. Coalition-SV will solve this problem.
  15. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 20 October 2023 10: 24
    -3
    I have one more question, why not additionally make such a self-propelled gun with an open wheelhouse on a tracked chassis (Hyacinth type) and an 8x8 wheeled one with an armored cab? AZ is not needed there, an OMS is needed. This will dramatically saturate the front with long-range howitzers. There is an example - the self-propelled gun Caesar.
    1. Hey
      Hey 20 October 2023 10: 31
      +2
      Closed cabin, no matter what, but protection from small and low-speed fragments. And in rain and snow, and in the wind, everything is better.
      1. alexoff
        alexoff 21 October 2023 10: 40
        0
        Ukry posted a video where it seemed like a Hemars was flying in from the coalition. The coalition stood for a while and left, a living confirmation that the protection is what is needed
    2. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 20 October 2023 13: 11
      +2
      I have one more question, why not additionally make such a self-propelled gun with an open wheelhouse on a tracked chassis (Hyacinth type) and an 8x8 wheeled one with an armored cab?


      Additionally, Rostec has not yet deployed a single Coalition-SV to the front, what additional developments could there be?!

      And so, of course, we need both a wheeled howitzer (for mobility) and a towed one (for mass production) with range characteristics similar to those of the Coalition-SV.
  16. egsp
    egsp 20 October 2023 10: 38
    +1
    The news is good, the main thing is to increase production. Happy Signalman's Day!
  17. TermNachTer
    TermNachTer 20 October 2023 10: 56
    +2
    This was discussed back in 2019. When will she be near Avdeevka?
  18. CROPPA
    CROPPA 20 October 2023 12: 08
    +4
    Is war still the engine of progress?
  19. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 20 October 2023 13: 07
    +4
    Well, come on, dear ones, quickly, she is really needed here at the front.
  20. Petr_Koldunov
    Petr_Koldunov 20 October 2023 13: 17
    +2
    Well, finally we will see it not only on Victory Day... We really hope for this weapon!
  21. Dva parovoza
    Dva parovoza 20 October 2023 13: 41
    +1
    "The crew is in an isolated armored capsule." The armored insulated capsule is based on the T-14 platform, which has not yet been put into production. Now it is based on the T-90. What kind of “insulated armored capsule” are we talking about?
    1. Alex
      Alex 20 October 2023 21: 22
      +1
      Only that the tower is uninhabited, and the crew is located in the front of the hull.
  22. bone1
    bone1 20 October 2023 20: 20
    +1
    Well, thank God, during the trials it hasn’t become obsolete yet?
  23. Artyom Savin
    Artyom Savin 21 October 2023 00: 14
    +1
    Judging by the fact that “serial production of the complex began in advance, the state corporation decided not to wait for the end of the tests,” the tests were purely a formality, the decision was made in advance
  24. Garris199
    Garris199 21 October 2023 02: 49
    +1
    Better late than never, of course, but in war conditions, late can have extremely unpleasant consequences.
  25. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 21 October 2023 08: 17
    +1
    How long it took to deal with her! Lots of problems, I guess. And the barrel, and the rifling, and the gunpowder... even high-precision shells. The SVO probably stimulated the acceleration of the process, and for a long, long time...
    Now the war will show everything.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. Eug
    Eug 21 October 2023 09: 20
    0
    It would also include means of detecting enemy artillery batteries, “working” for 70 kilometers... so that several “roaming” batteries could carry out enemy fire weapons systematically and “in one gate”...
  28. lukash66
    lukash66 21 October 2023 11: 20
    +1
    I think there are at least a dozen of them already in stock. Of course it’s zilch, but it’s okay, they’ll catch up. And then, they are not needed in thousands; two hundred will be enough for the near future. For regimental and divisional artillery there are simpler self-propelled guns.
  29. certero
    certero 21 October 2023 11: 44
    0
    What kind of precision projectile?
    Krasnopol does not fly such a distance.
  30. Vadim Topal Pasha
    Vadim Topal Pasha 21 October 2023 13: 18
    +2
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Quote from Orange Bigg
    Well, how would the Coalition-SV self-propelled guns pass the tests without ammunition?

    Spawn this did not happen, and again the same. ©
    Remember the SU-100 - tests have passed, production has begun... but the self-propelled guns are not entering the active army - there is no mass production of shells.

    Before the war, we bought the Tashkent leader from Italy. There were 100mm anti-aircraft guns on it. And we launched production for them.

    That is, 100mm shells began to be produced BEFORE the war! Even if initially ONLY anti-aircraft shrapnel was produced (which is not a fact), then having mass production of these anti-aircraft shrapnel, starting to produce steel blanks (armor-piercing) using the same equipment is never a problem.

    I would like to think that you were a little hasty in voicing your opinion. Don’t try to purposefully push us into knowingly false information.
  31. Vadim Topal Pasha
    Vadim Topal Pasha 21 October 2023 13: 21
    0
    Quote: Galleon
    Such a weapon system requires its own target designation system: a conventional UAV will not work here; its action is 70-80 km beyond the limits of the radio horizon in the VHF range and, therefore, the limits of its range. For the most part, our UAVs operate up to 30-40 km. Of course, we won’t know much, but in this vivid example I would like to see the level of our military thought among those whose weapons are plans and maps.

    In reality, there are cases of using UAVs using another one as a repeater.
  32. Codett
    Codett 21 October 2023 13: 23
    +1
    Very good, now we expect from the industry the mass production of self-propelled guns and shells for them, and from the army the rapid development of new self-propelled guns by the crews, our guys are waiting for it at the front.
  33. Windsurfer
    Windsurfer 21 October 2023 13: 27
    +2
    The basis of firepower is a 2 mm 88A152 gun with a firing speed of more than 10 rounds per minute, which is higher than the firing speed of other artillery systems.

    I wonder which ones? The same 2s19 also has a stated rate of fire of 10 rounds per minute, but here there are some “more than 10”. How much more? 10.1 rounds per minute is also “more than 10”. In short, we can conclude that a full-fledged automatic loader was never made for the coalition, do I understand correctly?
    1. Above_name
      Above_name 21 October 2023 15: 53
      +1

      . WindSurfer and here are some “more than 10”. How much more?


      I think it's from the journalist, they like the thoughtless and catchy "more".
      1. Windsurfer
        Windsurfer 22 October 2023 08: 57
        0
        Quote: Above_name
        . WindSurfer and here are some “more than 10”. How much more?


        I think it's from the journalist, they like the thoughtless and catchy "more".

        The problem is that these “more than 10” are found in all sources, I specifically looked for it yesterday because I remembered that for a two-barreled coalition they promised a rate of fire of 16 rounds, then they abandoned it on the grounds that technology has stepped forward and two barrels are no longer needed to achieve such a rate of fire. As a result, we have a modest “more than 10”, which immediately suggests that the level of loading automation remained at the 2s19 level.
  34. acetophenone
    acetophenone 21 October 2023 14: 41
    +1
    Years of development since 2002
    Years of production since 2013
    Years of operation since 2015
    Number issued, pcs. Xnumx
    feel
  35. Al manah
    Al manah 21 October 2023 19: 00
    -1
    20 years of development and testing. In 10 years they will join the troops.