“To protect the territory”: The Pentagon named the condition for the transfer of ATACMS missiles to Ukraine

11
“To protect the territory”: The Pentagon named the condition for the transfer of ATACMS missiles to Ukraine

Kyiv assured Washington that the ATACMS operational-tactical missiles transferred to Ukraine would be used only to protect “sovereign territory.” Under Zelensky’s promise, Biden allowed the missiles to be transferred to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This was stated by Pentagon spokesman Patrick Ryder.

The US Air Force brigadier general held another briefing, where he answered several questions about military assistance to Ukraine against the backdrop of what is happening in Israel, as well as about the ATACMS missiles supplied to Kyiv. According to Ryder, the transferred missiles are intended for use only within the territory of “sovereign Ukraine”; such a promise was made by Kiev. At the same time, he refused to talk about the amount of ammunition supplied to Ukraine, but confirmed that consultations on further supplies are ongoing.



I won't go into detail about the number of ATACMS we transmitted. But, as is the case with all other systems and equipment that we transferred to Ukraine, this was done with assurances that they would be used within sovereign Ukraine for the return and protection of sovereign Ukrainian territories

Ryder said.

The general also answered a question about the possible sending of 155-mm artillery shells intended for Ukraine to Israel, assuring that the United States has the ability to support two conflicts at once.

I have no information on this matter other than that we are confident that we can continue to support both Ukraine and Israel on the issue of defensive capabilities

- he added.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    11 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      20 October 2023 06: 51
      ATACMS operational-tactical missiles transferred to Ukraine will be used only for defense "sovereign territory"

      ***
      — We must wait until the “sovereign territory” becomes smaller, then it will be easier to defend...
      ***
      1. 0
        20 October 2023 06: 56
        I don't agree with you. The density of damage to a smaller area will be clearly higher!
      2. AAK
        +3
        20 October 2023 07: 01
        And who is stopping us, in order to reduce the “sovereign territory”, from mothballing the hundreds (according to some media reports) of the Tochka-U TRK launchers there with thousands of missiles, even if the range is not 300, but 120-140 km, but to work on the tactical rear That’s quite enough; Iskanders and missile launchers will remain for targets in the depths. Or such irresponsible chatter (about hundreds of launchers and thousands of missiles) is an ordinary fake and we have almost none of the relatively long-range weapons left in stock - they were dismantled, rotted, etc.
        1. +1
          20 October 2023 07: 46
          The Tochka-U fuel dispenser was decommissioned, some of the missiles were destroyed,
          1. +1
            20 October 2023 08: 43
            ATACMS are also not new, especially those that were given to Ukraine - but what is the effectiveness of their use - 3 missiles = "-" 9 helicopters in Berdyansk...
    2. 0
      20 October 2023 06: 57
      Well, there is no way to stop the supply of all sorts of rubbish, so it is necessary so that under the enemy his land burns. Man-made incidents in the states look interesting, however.
    3. 0
      20 October 2023 07: 09
      Kyiv assured Washington...
      It's already funny. When did Kyiv fulfill any obligations, especially in relation to Russia? And the Americans, knowing this very well, still “seriously” say that Zelensky assured them. Well, and then about the “sovereign territories” - blah, blah, poplars and noodles for the ears of the average person.
      1. -2
        20 October 2023 07: 51
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Kyiv assured Washington...
        It's already funny. When did Kyiv fulfill any obligations, especially in relation to Russia? And the Americans, knowing this very well, still “seriously” say that Zelensky assured them. Well, and then about the “sovereign territories” - blah, blah, poplars and noodles for the ears of the average person.

        As always. At least in relation to the use of Western weapons. Crimea and the “new regions” are regularly bombarded with the M-31, ATAKMS, Shadow Storm, etc., but commercial UAVs and Soviet junk are flying through the “old” regions. Personally, I have only heard about the only example of an attack by modern Western weapons on “old” regions - the KHARM attack on the airport in Belgorod.
        P.S. I do not in any way question the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation.
    4. 0
      20 October 2023 07: 17
      “To protect the territory”: The Pentagon named the condition for the transfer of ATACMS missiles to Ukraine
      To protect the world from all kinds of nonsense and inconsistency, it would be necessary to implement a plan to create a strait named after Comrade Stalin ... and do not forget to sink some of the islands from where they constantly shit!
      This is so, a free fantasy on the topic of how to make our world better, calmer!
    5. +2
      20 October 2023 08: 04
      Transfer Iskanders with nuclear weapons to Iran to protect the territory. How they will protect it and return it. And where are the contradictions?
      1. +1
        20 October 2023 08: 43
        Quote: evgen1221
        Transfer Iskanders with nuclear weapons to Iran to protect the territory. How they will protect it and return it. And where are the contradictions?

        At one time, we transferred thousands of tanks, hundreds of aircraft and air defense systems to the ATS countries. Remind me which side of the front all this equipment is on now? Want to repeat?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"