The DPRK reacted to the visit of the American nuclear aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan to South Korea

7
The DPRK reacted to the visit of the American nuclear aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan to South Korea

The carrier strike group (ACG) of the US Navy arrived at the port of Busan (South Korea). The DPRK reacted negatively to the visit of the American nuclear aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan and its accompanying ships to South Korea.

Pyongyang's reaction was outlined in an article published by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), which belongs to the DPRK authorities.



North Korean media notes that the dispatch of strategic nuclear forces of the United States has recently become regular. Pyongyang claims that it indicates the Washington administration's desire to start a nuclear war against the DPRK. The agency says North Korea will not shy away from deciding on an appropriate response to the threat.

The media draws attention to the fact that the joint exercises of the American, Japanese and South Korean militaries, as well as the visit of the US Navy AUG to Busan, took place shortly after the United States, together with allied states, created an advisory body that would deal with nuclear issues. Pyongyang regarded these actions as an “intensification of a nuclear attack” on North Korea and an increasing risk of war on the Korean Peninsula using weapons of mass destruction.

On October 12, the port of Busan was visited by ships of the US Navy's 5th Aircraft Carrier Force, including the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan. Shortly before this, from October 9 to 10, joint naval exercises of the United States, Japan and South Korea took place near the South Korean island of Jeju.
  • The US Department of Defense
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    13 October 2023 09: 49
    The DPRK reacted to the visit of the American nuclear aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan to South Korea

    The reaction is correct. These are the kind of allies Russia needs...
    It's time to ask how it is in the DPRK with anti-ship missile systems...Can I help with anything or share old Soviet secrets and developments?
    1. +2
      13 October 2023 10: 00
      ..Can you help with anything or share old Soviet secrets and best practices?
      ...they themselves will supply them to whoever you want...though the performance characteristics are low...but this is offset by their quantity...AUGs are installed in 100 percent out of 100
    2. 0
      14 October 2023 12: 43
      -- 1898 The American battleship/cruiser Maine was blown up in the port of Havana, the reason for the war with Spain for the possession of Cuba.
      -- 1915 The United States is “substituting” the Lusitania cruise liner for torpedoes from German submarines.
      Reason for joining WWI.
      - 1941. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, provoked by the American "Hella" note,
      Essentially putting Japan in an almost hopeless situation. US entry into WWII.
      -- 1964 The USS Maddox is allegedly being attacked by torpedo boats in the Gulf of Tonkin, the blame, OF COURSE, falls on the shoulders of Vietnam...
      And how many ground provocations there were...
  2. 0
    13 October 2023 10: 07
    They diverted the aircraft carrier to themselves for at least a month or more.
    Good ally.
  3. +2
    13 October 2023 10: 51
    North Korea will not shy away from deciding on an appropriate response to the threat.
    And first of all, it will go to the US allies in this region - the Republic of Kazakhstan and Japan with American bases on their territory. Therefore, it is premature for the South Koreans and Japanese to rejoice that they are supported by the United States. In case of danger to the United States itself (bases, fleet), the Americans will think first of all about themselves.
  4. +1
    13 October 2023 11: 56
    Kim has written down in the constitution the grounds for launching a nuclear strike and that’s enough, everyone concerned should understand, and if the US and their allies don’t understand, that’s their problem.
    The aircraft carrier is a huge and immovable colossus, it is almost impossible to miss it with modern missile weapons and no air defense or missile defense systems provide a 100% guarantee of safety.
    US citizens do not fight alone, therefore it is important for anti-colonial-minded government entities to join forces in the fight against neo-colonialism, and not try to resist alone and thereby doom themselves to defeat.
  5. 0
    14 October 2023 19: 01
    Who knows what devices are in the foreground? Pictured in the header. Salute guns?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"