President of Belarus: Americans are pushing Russia to use the most terrible weapons

51
President of Belarus: Americans are pushing Russia to use the most terrible weapons

President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko emphasized that by equipping the militants of the Kyiv regime with long-range missiles, the Americans are pushing Russia to use the worst weapons.

During his trip to the border Brest region, Lukashenko told reporters that if the United States supplies the Ukrainian army with missiles capable of hitting targets at a distance of 300 kilometers or more, Russian leader Vladimir Putin and the military leadership of the Russian Federation will not look at it calmly.



Lukashenko also noted that the ongoing actions of the West aimed at escalating and escalating the armed conflict in Ukraine could lead to the Russians taking out and putting the “red button” on the table. If the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue their attacks deep into Russian territory, Russia’s response will be colossal. The Belarusian leader added that it is stupid for the US leadership to believe that they will be able to sit out the conflict overseas - the whole world will inevitably be drawn into the conflict.

It is also reported that the President of Belarus congratulated his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on his birthday by phone, after which the heads of state discussed the most pressing issues and the schedule of upcoming contacts.

It is planned that the next meeting of the leaders of Russia and Belarus will take place on October 13 in Bishkek, where a meeting of the Council of Heads of State of the CIS will be held. According to preliminary agreements, the heads of state will discuss in detail the issues of relations between their countries that are on the agenda.
  • kremlin.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    7 October 2023 14: 21
    Americans are pushing Russia to use the most terrible weapons.

    Before nuclear weapons, at least until tactical nuclear weapons, it’s still like the sky. Even the so-called AVBPM was never used.(((
    The Dnieper dams were never hit, at least slightly as a warning.
    1. +4
      7 October 2023 14: 28
      But he didn’t say a word about nuclear weapons and tactical weapons. These hints with the “red button” are non-binding bullshit))) And the “colossal” answer could be the use of other weapons, simply on a huge scale.
      1. -1
        7 October 2023 14: 50
        Other weapons, and on a huge scale, can only be used by DAM. And even then from the podium, into the microphone
        1. +2
          7 October 2023 14: 58
          Dadada... Now "spineless" (in your understanding) Russia will not respond to anything, will lose this war and hide under a bunk? Is this how you imagine it? Are you already sitting on your suitcases?
          Russia can do anything when there is a serious reason. Don't even doubt it.
          1. +1
            7 October 2023 17: 47
            Rather, an intermediate option is being drawn - achieving the next "Minsk" while sitting on the defensive, i.e. without greatly irritating former partners and without injuring “benevolent observers.” What else could the wagging of the guarantor’s butt mean in response to the question of Karaganov, who, by the way, was never a “militarist”, but even he was bothered by the indistinct movements of the Kremlin mustache.
    2. -2
      7 October 2023 14: 39
      If you use nuclear weapons in Ukraine, then you need to start with its western regions (Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ternopil, Volyn and Rivne).
      1. +1
        7 October 2023 16: 38
        Quote: Nikolay Ivanov_5
        If you use nuclear weapons in Ukraine

        For long-term peace to come throughout the world, one Sarmatian strike on London is enough. Specifically in London, not in the USA. All conflicts throughout the world will immediately cease. But for now this is unrealistic, because of the children and families of our so-called “elite” who are there and their stolen dough.
        1. 0
          7 October 2023 17: 50
          Let's start with at least an attempt to destroy infrastructure/logistics in the west and center with something heavy, at least non-nuclear. Isolating the battlefield in bed will solve all the issues with the fascist pigsty.
    3. -5
      7 October 2023 14: 57
      Before nuclear weapons, at least until tactical nuclear weapons, it’s still like the sky. Even the so-called AVBPM was never used.(((
      The Dnieper dams were never hit, at least slightly as a warning.


      I was always surprised by the cowardly belligerence of the jingoistic patriots. We are ready to destroy the legacy of the USSR into dust, but we are afraid to even mentally consider the option of destroying at least weapons transshipment bases in adjacent territories.
      1. -2
        7 October 2023 15: 03
        After the use of nuclear weapons from the western regions of Ukraine, it will be necessary to switch to the territories of Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.
        1. -5
          7 October 2023 15: 07
          Are you promoting genocide on a global scale? If you want blood so badly, then why the hell aren’t you on the front line of the killer?
          1. +1
            7 October 2023 15: 13
            Why do you turn a blind eye to the genocide of the Russian population, perpetrated by the Ukrainian fascists, on the territory of Eastern Ukraine???
            1. -3
              7 October 2023 15: 27
              A response to genocide with genocide. Bravo. Why are we better than them then? I take it this is different?
              1. -1
                7 October 2023 15: 32
                The Western world taught us for 30 years, forced us to be soft, plush and white, killing us slowly. Why don’t we continue to resist???
            2. -5
              7 October 2023 15: 32
              And I’ll repeat my question again: if you so want blood and revenge, then why aren’t you on the front line?
              1. +2
                7 October 2023 15: 37
                Why do liberals and non-liberals have the same question??? What are people like you doing here???
                1. -4
                  7 October 2023 15: 44
                  Why do murderers and avengers like you always answer askance to the front line and always go somewhere else? So why not on the front line? Is it so difficult to answer?
                  1. +1
                    7 October 2023 15: 46
                    Why should I disclose information about myself to the enemy???
                    1. -3
                      7 October 2023 15: 50
                      Ahh, are all those who are against the use of nuclear weapons enemies? Clearly understood. The bots are boring these days, but they can’t jump off properly.
                      1. +1
                        7 October 2023 15: 55
                        If you live in Russia, then go abroad to where people like you live. Why do you come to our sites and correspond???
                      2. -3
                        7 October 2023 15: 59
                        Wait a minute!!!! Are you saying that everyone who lives in Russia is for using nuclear weapons? Did you decide this yourself or are there just 2-3 people around you with the same views as you and that’s why you decided for everyone? And secondly, there is no point in sending me out of the country just because I am against the use of nuclear weapons.
                      3. 0
                        7 October 2023 16: 06
                        I wrote an answer that if you use nuclear weapons, you need to start from Western Ukraine and through the countries through which Western weapons are supplied to Ukraine. Where did you now see the demand for a nuclear strike on these territories???
                      4. -2
                        7 October 2023 16: 13
                        Oh, that's it. And when the USSR supplied weapons during the war in Korea and Vietnam, it turns out that we also had the right to use nuclear weapons? Or is it something else?
                      5. 0
                        7 October 2023 16: 26
                        What do these events have to do with it??? What are you even thinking??? Do not waste my time.
                      6. -4
                        7 October 2023 16: 48
                        I gave you the same example, when our country also supplied weapons to countries in which there was a war and this did not and does not bother you. But when suddenly we ourselves find ourselves in a situation where our enemy is being supplied with weapons, that’s something else. Who's talking about double standards?
      2. 0
        7 October 2023 17: 55
        I was always surprised by the cowardly belligerence of the jingoistic patriots. Ready to destroy the legacy of the USSR into dust

        In this matter, we need consistency, growing inevitably from simple to complex. The easiest way to isolate is to destroy bridges/western entry points. It won’t help - regarding the nearest Western logistics, etc.. The main thing is the inevitability of “warned, done”, with an increase in degree. This can be sobering. Otherwise, at best, we will face an endless war with numerous Bandera frostbitten meat
  2. 0
    7 October 2023 14: 25
    Doesn’t your father have any blood living there behind the tubercle? They are tired of pushing.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    7 October 2023 14: 28
    Quote: Rumata
    Americans are pushing Russia to use the most terrible weapons.

    Before nuclear weapons, at least until tactical nuclear weapons, it’s still like the sky. Even the so-called AVBPM was never used.(((
    The Dnieper dams were never hit, at least slightly as a warning.

    The destruction of the Dnieper dams will lead to the death of a million people, something like this.
    1. -2
      7 October 2023 14: 42
      It is necessary to start using nuclear weapons from Western Ukraine.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    7 October 2023 14: 29
    that the Russians will take out and put a “red button” on the table.

    In Soviet times, the most terrible weapon was the construction battalion. wassat
    What does dad mean now is a big question! recourse
    1. 0
      7 October 2023 14: 45
      Sapper shovel!
      A terrible weapon of mass destruction...... A sea of ​​blood.
  6. -2
    7 October 2023 14: 29
    In reality, we have already crossed the line a hundred times when we must use nuclear weapons, taking into account the disarmament of conventional weapons of our army. soldier
    1. +3
      7 October 2023 14: 38
      Maybe stop being stupid enough to write about nuclear weapons? Against whom should nuclear weapons be used, against Ukraine? to scare Britain? With such success, you can detonate nuclear weapons over the Kremlin - then Britain will definitely be “scared.” Vaughn Semonyan suggested rushing over Siberia.
      1. +1
        7 October 2023 14: 47
        Everyone who drowns for Yao is, for the most part, bots, provocateurs on a salary. Well, they're just sick in the head.
    2. -1
      7 October 2023 15: 02
      Old Man is a man who understands his responsibility for his family, for the collective farm, for the region, for the country. He knows the history of the USSR, the history of Belarus and how many people died in the Great Patriotic War.
      It will be necessary to use nuclear weapons to prevent this from happening, and we need to be prepared for this. soldier
      1. 0
        7 October 2023 15: 07
        So that’s the question - against whom and for what purposes and what kind of nuclear weapons to use. There are no targets in Ukraine for either tactical nuclear weapons or strategic nuclear weapons.
        1. -3
          7 October 2023 15: 19
          And Lvov, this viper Bandera? There, from kindergarten on, they teach you to kill Russians. soldier
          1. 0
            7 October 2023 15: 21
            And what? The Lvov viper can be destroyed with conventional weapons. Why use nuclear weapons and what kind to use?
            1. -2
              7 October 2023 16: 50
              They won’t even have time to get scared from nuclear weapons, they will die instantly, in a sense this is a humanitarian weapon, but from ordinary weapons they will suffer, remember Dresden, Tokyo. soldier
  7. -1
    7 October 2023 14: 33
    There will be another red line...
    It will not come to the point of using something completely serious.
    1. 0
      7 October 2023 17: 09
      Apparently, long-range missiles are already in Ukraine and we should hurry. How was it not too late with the use of serious.
  8. -1
    7 October 2023 14: 45
    Country U also has the “most terrible weapon” (nuclear power plant). And with the greatest probability it WILL BE USED in the southern Ukrainian version to cut off the advance of the Russian army on Odessa.
  9. -1
    7 October 2023 14: 51
    Why are the heads of state of Belarus and Russia meeting more often?!
    Which one of them is the initiator of drinking on Wednesdays? laughing
  10. +3
    7 October 2023 15: 07
    If the Americans are “pushing Russia”, it means that this is what they need. I don’t remember a time when they pushed anything to their detriment.
    Old Man has already admitted that he and Putin were simply pushed into the Minsk Agreements...

    As for Russian bosses, even at VO many authors claim that they are pushing it into the abyss.
  11. -3
    7 October 2023 15: 18
    First, an ICBM without a nuclear warhead, for example, in the center of Lviv. For reasons of humanity, we warned the townspeople a week in advance so that they had time to flee. If neither the Ukrainians nor the West understand the hint, then in the same place there will be the same ICBM but with nuclear weapons. Then they will definitely think about whether Ukraine is worth the increased radiation in Europe and even a little in the USA?
    1. -1
      7 October 2023 16: 54
      What a haste, though. For now we are talking about withdrawing from the test cancellation agreement. That is, for starters, conduct atmospheric or stratospheric tests and see the impact of the explosion on the satellite constellation and communications in general.
  12. -1
    7 October 2023 15: 20
    Quote: Vladimir M
    So that’s the question - against whom and for what purposes and what kind of nuclear weapons to use. There are no targets in Ukraine for either tactical nuclear weapons or strategic nuclear weapons.

    Westernism. Russia doesn’t really need it, there are few Russians there.
  13. +2
    7 October 2023 15: 29
    The most terrible weapon is a new item on the battlefield, which horrifies with its ability to defeat a living target.
    During his trip to the border Brest region, Lukashenko told reporters that if the United States supplies the Ukrainian army with missiles capable of hitting targets at a distance of 300 kilometers or more, Russian leader Vladimir Putin and the military leadership of the Russian Federation will not look at it calmly.

    It will look like this - every day they shell Russia, and Lend Lease goes to Ukraine.
    And in general
    Putin: Russia will strike new targets if long-range missiles are supplied to Ukraine

    This is already dementia.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    8 October 2023 13: 37
    The Americans don’t care - Russia in the foreseeable future most likely will not strike the United States, and they will continue to plant their puppets in other countries, including Russia, or fight with the wrong hands, as is now the case in Ukraine. The Russian leadership was, is, and will remain so (most likely) too weak.
  16. +1
    8 October 2023 13: 40
    Quote: Warabey
    Dadada... Now "spineless" (in your understanding) Russia will not respond to anything, will lose this war and hide under a bunk? Is this how you imagine it? Are you already sitting on your suitcases?
    Russia can do anything when there is a serious reason. Don't even doubt it.

    When is it serious? When are NATO tanks on Sadovoe? Well, that won't happen. Russia is just a cash cow and the attitude towards it is the same.
  17. -1
    9 October 2023 11: 55
    Russia has knowledge and weapons from ancient civilizations, our ancestors.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"