American Calvary of Russian Orphans

57
American Calvary of Russian OrphansThe response to the American “Magnitsky Act” in the form of “the law of Dima Yakovlev”, adopted by the State Duma of Russia, caused a flurry of madness in the West. We will understand the reason.

Today, the so-called "adoption" of Russian children in the West has been turned into a super profitable business with an annual turnover of more than 10 billion dollars. At the same time, the “adoption” is increasingly growing together with the criminal world, seeking to gain at any cost. Children are often sold (as such), not interested in their future fate ...

Western and Russian-speaking traffickers, “living goods,” who have joined the co-operation, everywhere violate not only the procedure and terms for registering children, but also the Basic Law of Russia. While the “internal” adoption is deliberately inhibited, the majority of court cases about the “external” adoption of Russian children by foreigners are decided with the wording of immediate execution. Even despite the fact that the law allows it only in exceptional cases. On the one hand, work with Russian families wishing to adopt children is going from bad to worse. Most often they create a lot of artificial obstacles. For example, they offer to travel for many hundreds or even thousands of kilometers. On the other hand, the procedure of “external” acquisition of children by foreigners is being accelerated in every possible way. This is facilitated by the fact that officials often send the questionnaires of babies immediately to the federal bank, not even trying to arrange them in their region. After that, children are urgently taken abroad and it is often impossible to challenge the execution of the decision.

At the same time, the transfer (expulsion) of minor citizens of Russia for adoption outside the Russian Federation is not only disgraceful in its essence, but also inconclusive. All Russian adoptive children remain citizens of Russia until they come of age, and paragraph 1 Art. 61 of the Constitution states: "A citizen of the Russian Federation may not be expelled from the Russian Federation or extradited to another state." Thus, as V.Tretyakov correctly points out, minors transferred for adoption and, consequently, permanent life in the families of foreigners, are actually EXHAUSTED OVER RUSSIA OR GIVEN TO ANOTHER STATE, automatically falling not only into its territory, but also under the jurisdiction of its laws. Minors and especially young children do not have the physical or legal ability to express their will. Consequently, they are sent outside of Russia (and not leaving on their own initiative) against their will. That is, all adoptions of minor citizens with their export to the West, by definition, contradict the Constitution of Russia, and the relevant decisions of any authorities and officials are unconstitutional.

According to the Russian Mothers public organization, about half a million Russian children are forcibly separated from their parents today around the world! You can give a "simple" answer to the question - why exactly they are so popular with foreigners - they say, because the "live product" from Russia is very cheap. In the United States, for example, aggressive PR campaigns for adopting Russian children even emphasize that “it is simply impossible to adopt white children cheaper”. Indeed, adopting a baby from Russia before the 1 year in the States is much cheaper than the American one, for which childless families have to pay about 100 thousand dollars, while the Russian baby will cost 10 times cheaper.

The boom of "adoption" of Russian children by foreigners came in the middle of 1990's. At that time, on average more than 11.000 babies were exported from Russia annually. Most are illegal. Only in the United States, according to far from complete data, over 59 thousands of Russian kids have been exported. Today, even if we proceed from the most optimistic statistics of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, on average 15.000 children per year disappear in the country, in other words, 41 is a child per day (unofficial statistics of foundations and public organizations dealing with this issue are higher in 1,5-2)! At the same time, Russia ranks 4-e place in the world in the number of children extradited abroad, second only to Afghanistan, Iraq and Poland.

Why do foreign children need Russian children? For different purposes. For the West, a child growing up with his parents gives nothing to the state. But, as soon as he is withdrawn from his parents, he turns into a commodity that brings substantial profit. Not without reason, the municipalities of Western countries are already holding entire tenders on the issue of where to distribute children seized from their parents. They are won, as a rule, by private firms and shelters. At stake is a lot of money, budget subsidies ...

For example, in Finland, each adoptive family receives a euro for a ward of a minor 1.800 per month, and a city for each child seized - a euro 2.200. It is not surprising that over the past year local social services in Finland took over more than 17 thousands of children from their parents, and in 2013, the Finnish parliament is going to pass a law according to which children can be taken from their parents without a trial and on a permanent basis, then adoption"! This is despite the fact that even today the decision on the removal of children from 3 months to 3 years can be made by the Finnish social worker alone. Even on the basis of anonymous denunciation.

That is, children are not just a product, but a profitable product. And if the child is injured, he as a product becomes even more expensive! Among other things, and because the foster "family" will then be allocated even more funds to care for him. To this circumstance, which is extremely important for understanding what is happening around the “Magnitsky Act” in the West, there are two approaches. Similar inhumanity, sometimes interrelated, but still different - “socio-medical” and “individually pathological”, to a certain extent shed light on the causes of bullying and mutilation of children in foster families.

I think many people remember the recent scandalous sentence of Nadezhda Fratty-Shcheglacheva, accused of exporting fraudulently to Italy, allegedly for the adoption of more than a thousand Russian children. According to investigators, thanks to bribed judges, regional officials and directors of orphanages who received bribes up to 150 thousand dollars, children under the age of 3-s were sent to Italy. Investigators from Moscow, who visited the Apennines in order to establish their further destinies, were able to find traces of only 5 babies from more than 1.200! And this, in the opinion of Italian journalists, was made with the aim of “putting the vigilance of the law enforcement agencies to sleep”.

While Russian investigators were searching for missing children in Rome, Naples and Genoa, Italian Interior Minister Roberto Maroni made a sensational statement that the "disappeared" 1260 kids from Russia were taken to private organ transplant clinics. “Juvenile immigrants turn out to be a gold bottom for traffickers who sell their organs,” Maroni said at the annual UNICEF assembly in Rome. - We have reason to talk about the sale of children's organs. And signs of trade have already been found in Italy. ” At the same time, the minister announced terrible figures: from 1974 to 2008, 9.802 minors disappeared without a trace in Italy, 8.080 of which are foreigners. According to him, today in Italy 8 children disappear weekly. “These“ invisible children ”come from faraway countries and disappear into nowhere, says the newspaper“ La Stampa ”, for example, from Lampedusa Island (Sicily), where reception centers for illegal immigrants are located, in 2009, more than 1320 disappeared from 400 children ".

The link between the disappearance of a huge number of children from Russia and the search for organs for transplantation is also confirmed by the deputy head of the GUUR of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Alexei Savin. Transplantology became the branch of medicine at the end of 1980-x - the beginning of 1990-x, giving rise to the donor supply industry and coinciding with the beginning of the large-scale export of Russian children to the West. The illegal component of this “business” brings huge profits to the organizers. For example, the heart in the "organ market" costs 160 thousand. Liver from 60 to 150 thousand. Pancreas - 45 thousand. Kidney - 10 thousand. The boy's foreskin - 20 thousand dollars ...

According to the available information, the supply of organs to the countries of the “golden billion” is controlled by a criminal gang from Western Europe. And hundreds of Russian kids annually completely “disappearing” in Italy alone - this is only a drop in a sea of ​​terrible blood business. Professor Gerhard Muller, one of the world's leading criminologists on the planet, who has proposed the special term “transnational organized crime”, meaning criminal actions that violate the laws of more than one country, has already introduced the UN classification that divides all 17 transnational crimes groups, 13, the term “trade in human organs”.

Today, although donor organs are a huge deficit (for example, in the USA, where organ donation is widespread, the usual waiting period for an organ for transplantation ranges from 2 to 7 years), the world is experiencing a rapid increase in the number of such operations. For example, more than 20 liver transplantation centers are already active in the US. Only officially and only in one 2002 year, 4.536 transplants from dead donors and 326 from live ones have been performed. In small Portugal, with a population of less than 10 million, more than 140 liver transplants are performed annually. For comparison - in the 145-million of Russia from 1990 to 2002 the year of such operations was carried out all 108 ...

This data is very outdated, in the 2003 year, when the "flywheel" was not yet widely promoted, and they are given specifically for people far from medicine. In order to understand that in the West every year not a few, but many thousands of transplant operations are performed, many tens and hundreds of thousands of patients need organs. And the demand in the “world of purity and profit” inevitably creates supply. Hundreds of annually disappearing foreign children and 1260 children exported from Russia for 8 years to Italy are phenomena of the same order.

Examples include the Italian press reports of hundreds of clandestine kidney transplants performed by the Roman surgeon Rafaelo Cortesini, and a press conference of congregation priests Maria Claudio Avallonei Benito Fusco's maidservants who reported missing in Nampula (with 2001) more than XNNX (with 100) children, the bodies of many of which were later found in a “gutted” form, and Albanian drug terrorists cutting organs of Kosovo Serbs, and Yusuf Sonmez, known as the Buzzard, is a “night transplant” from Stam along with Rome, the capital of the bloody business, has spent hundreds of operations on the natives of Russia, Ukraine and Moldova in the private clinics of Meiyan and Vatan, whose kidneys evaluate thousands of dollars in 3, and the scandal around one of the clinics of Colombia’s mass grave of children abducted for the cornea, and then killed, the following fact speaks of the scale: the 1.395 still couldn’t find the “patients” of this clinic ...

Transplantation, i.e. The transplantation of human organs and tissues is not only a crime, but also one of the areas of high-tech medical services. In the early stages of the development of transplant, leadership belonged to the USSR. However, the United States played a decisive role in setting up “flow” operations (the initial milestones consider kidney transplantation in 1954 as D. Murray, liver transplantation in 1963 by T. Starsl and heart transplant in 1967 by K. Barnard). The USA is still leading in this area. Many renowned politicians in the West turned to the services of American transplantologists. Among them, for example, former US President Bill Clinton and ex-Polish President Lech Walesa. In the American hospital, the hearts of ex-president of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev, ex-president of Portugal Jorge Sampaio changed hearts ...

In the United States itself, the issue of organ donation is resolved in a simple way - for an adult, it is sometimes enough to put a tick on the back of a driver's license. For a child, parental consent is sufficient. And if the child is not native? Asking this question, we are closely approaching the answer to another question: why the ban on adoption of Russian children has caused such a furious reaction in the USA. And even the overwhelming benefit from the denunciation of the agreement between Russia and the United States on cooperation in the field of adoption, which could deprive Russians of the legal opportunity to demand access to the already adopted children from the American side (from an interview with the Euronews TV channel of the Foreign Minister of Russia S. Lavrov: “If we stop adopting, this means only one thing - we must denounce this agreement. If we denounce it, there will be no legal possibility to demand access to our children. ")

The fact is that not only American families have an interest in Russian children, but also very serious structures that do not want publicity. Behind the Democratic Party, whose president is now in power in the United States, are the interests of powerful pharmacological companies, manufacturers of medical products interested in their trials. The interest in testing new drugs without large cash costs is enormous. In addition, there is often a need for data disclosure. For clarity, what is at stake: from 16 trillion. US dollars for medicine accounts for about 2 trillion, or over 12% of superpower GDP, a number of medical studies are completely closed programs commissioned by the Pentagon (for example, studying the genetic code of the Slavic population). Children from orphanages in Russia not only sometimes need to be cured of serious illnesses for which there are no medicines yet, but they do not have parents who do not allow pharmacological tests and other experiments on their children.

According to the US National Report on Child Abuse Status published in December 2012, the state of 51 has a real epidemic of violence. Allegations of bullying of children are reported every 10 seconds. American human rights activists say that today their country confidently occupies the top position in the ranking of developed countries on child abuse. Over the 2011 year, more than 3,4 million complaints of violence against more than 6 million children have been received by the US government ...

Every day in the US, 5 children die from violence. 78% of children killed by adults are parting with life according to “the scenario of Dima Yakovlev” (“neglect of the life and interests of the child”). Here are just a few examples from the number of officially registered since 1996, when in the United States they began to officially “adopt” children from Russia. It should be remembered that 50-60% of cases of this kind of child death as the facts of parental “neglect” are not documented, that is, they do not receive the corresponding registration in the death certificate ...

9 February 1996 was beaten to death by 2-year-old Kostya Shlepin (David Polreis Jr., Colorado, “adopted” 6 months before the murder). More than 90% of the baby’s body was covered with cuts which, according to the receptionist “mother” Renee Polreis, the child applied to itself with a wooden spoon.

25 November 1998, a 3-year-old girl from Smolensk died from head injuries (Logan Higginbotham, Vermont, “adopted” 7 months before the murder). The foster "mother" Lora Higginbotham first stated that the child fell and hit his head on the floor of the bedroom. After several years of forensic examination, she was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 1 year of imprisonment.

October 31 2000 of the year died of heart failure 6-year-old Vitya Tulimov (adoptive name of Viktor Matthey, New Jersey, was “adopted” for 10 months before the murder). The cause of death - adoptive "parents" Robert and Brenda Matthey after brutally beating by adoptive "father" locked the child for the night in an unheated room.

30 November 2001 of the head injuries, “baby shaking syndrome”, and nutritional deficiency died an 1,5-year-old kid from Inozemtsevo (adoptive name Luke Evans, Indiana, “adopted” 6 months before the murder). The foster mother, Natalie Fabian Evans, stated that she could not wake the child that morning and so she dipped it into a bath with water to “stimulate” where the baby “probably hit her head against the bath.” Evans was first prosecuted for the murder, but then (30.06.2006) was officially declared innocent.

14 December 2001 from head injuries, second-degree burns on the legs, hemorrhages in the eye, bruises and convulsions. 5-year-old boy from Pskov (adopted by Jacob Lindorff, New Jersey, “adopted” 6 weeks before the murder). The foster "mother" Heather Lindorfr, who claimed that the injuries were due to accidents, was found guilty of aggravated crime. Foster "father" James was sentenced to 4 years of probation and 400 public work hours for abusing children.

15 August 2002 of a severe head injury (bilateral skull fracture, stroke, brain edema) died 2-tion Nikita Horiakov (Zachary Higier, Massachusetts). Foster "mother" Natalie Higier said that the baby fell out of the crib and hit his head on the floor. Later, pleading guilty to manslaughter (they say, threw the baby into the air, and he hit his head on the coffee table), the murderer was sentenced to 2,5 years of imprisonment, shortly after which the execution of the sentence was suspended for 4 year.

October 20 The 2002 year olds Yana and Anatoly Kolenda (Yana and Anatoliy Kolenda, Mass., “Adopted” 11 year before the murder) and their adoptive mother are slaughtered. Foster "father" Richard Kolenda called the police, said that he had killed his family, and then shot himself in front of the city mayor’s office building.

October 23 2002 from the "baby shaking syndrome" died 2-year-old baby from Ussuriysk (adoptive name Maria Bennett, Ohio, "adopted" for 9 months before the murder). The foster mother Susan Jane Bennett first said that she had dropped the girl. The medical report did not confirm this. Bennett then declared her reluctance to dispute the charge of negligent homicide and was sentenced to 3 years in prison.

11 August 2003 died of suffocation 2-year-old baby from Moscow (adoptive name Jessica Albina Hagmann). The foster "mother" Patrice Lynn Hagmann claimed to have killed her "by chance, trying to calm the tantrum" of the baby. The murderer was sentenced to a suspended sentence and two more deferred sentences for 5 years.

October 16 2003 from burns 2 and 3 degree and failure to provide assistance died 3-year-old Dima Ishlankulov (Liam Dmitry Thompson, Ohio, “adopted” 5 months before the murder). Harry's adoptive “father” dipped him in a bath of water heated to 140 degrees (approximately 60 centigrade). The foster "mother" Emmy, who had not provided any assistance to the child for several days, after which she anointed her with petroleum jelly, was convicted of manslaughter, her husband - for the murder.

18 December 2003 was beaten to death by adoptive “mother” 6-year-old Alyosha Geiko (Alex Pavlis, Illinois, “adopted” 6 weeks before the murder). 32 bruises, scars and cuts were found on the body of the child. The foster mother was charged with manslaughter.

22 January 2005 died from heart failure caused by hunger, 8-year-old Denis Uritsky (Dennis Merryman, Md., “Adopted” 5 years before the murder). The corpse of a child weighed 37 pounds (about 17 kg). Foster "parents" Samuel and Donna Merryman are accused of first-degree murder and child abuse.

2 July 2005 of the year died from a blow to the stomach of 2-year-old Vika Bazhenova (Nina Hilt, North Carolina, “adopted” for 1,5 the year before the murder). The foster "mother" Peggi Hilt, who was an alcoholic who suffered from mental problems, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in March 2006 to avoid being charged with first-degree murder.

August 14 2005 month Ilya Kargyntsev (Isaac Jonathan Dykstra, Iowa, “adopted” for 21 one month before the murder) died from an incompatible with the life of a skull injury, severe intracranial bleeding, retinal tear in both eyes. Extensive bruises were found on the body of the deceased on the torso and legs. Foster "father" Brian Dykstra, originally accused of second-degree intentional murder, was released on bail for 3 dollars, and later (15.000) was found innocent. Reception "mother" from the very beginning was officially considered "uncomplicated."

7 March 2008 of the year from a fracture of the skull, legs and hips died 14-month-old Kohl Yemelyantsev (Nicoli Emelyantsev, Utah). The foster mother was charged with first-degree murder. The adoptive “father” was also charged with child abuse against another “adopted” 4-year-old child from Russia.

8 July 2008 died of heat stroke 21-month-old Dima Yakovlev died (Chase Harrison, Va., “Adopted” 3 one month before death). The adoptive “father” Myles Harrison “forgot” the child on the 9 watch in the back of the Suburban car in the sun. The Fairfax County Court (17.12.2008), on the pretext of “father has already suffered enough enough”, was found not guilty in manslaughter.

25 August 2009 died from traumatic brain injury 7-year-old Vanya Skorobogatov (Nathaniel Craver, Pa., “Adopted” 6 years before the murder, along with his twin sister). Nanette and Michael Craver are charged with first-degree murder for beating his adopted son to death. However, according to the judge, the prosecutor’s office was unable to “convincingly prove the guilt of the spouses in deliberately inflicting bodily harm on the boy” (more than 80 injuries were recorded on the body of the deceased child, 20 of which is on his head) The judge also did not recognize the public danger of the Craver couple and did not impose any restrictions on communication with the twin sister of the deceased Dasha, who currently lives with the parents of the adoptive “father” killer.

Another Russian child was killed in the US 10 June 2010, just at the time when the US began negotiations on the adoption of children from Russia. 8-year-old Kirill Kazakov (Jackson David Attuso, Louisiana, “adopted” 7 years before the murder) while walking with his adoptive “mother” and “brother” was first “lost sight of”, and then found with numerous stabbing wounds and slit throat. According to local media reports citing the sheriff’s statement, the killer - 16-year-old high school student at the local school Trevor Reese - does not deny the guilt and even boasts a crime ...

In July, 2012, just a week after the signing of an agreement between Russia and the United States on cooperation in the field of adoption, a couple of Matthew and Amy Sweeney were arrested. He is accused of ill-treatment of the “adopted” 6 years ago by the Russian child Danila Kruchina, she is of “neglecting the interests” of this child. 7 January 2013, the grand jury will decide on the question of bringing a sadist to a US court ...

I repeat: these are just a few examples of a far from complete obituary of children from Russia who were killed and tortured with pathological cruelty by American psychopaths. And at the same time the answer to the question of why people who prefer to get rid of their own parents, putting them into nursing homes, suddenly rushed to adopt children from Russia en masse. Especially since in the United States there is someone to adopt. According to official statistics from the US Department of Education for 2012, the number of homeless children in the United States is almost a million!

According to US officials, most of the officially registered homeless minors live in special shelters, cheap hotels, at railway stations, as well as in churches and hospitals. Some let under the roof of the familiar. Many of these children use drugs and become victims of sexual offenses. Some have sex for food, clothing or shelter. However, there is one "but" - for mockery of even such an American child, you can go to jail for many years, or even to an electric chair. But for the murder of a Russian child, you can sometimes get rid of only a slight fright.

* * *

December 28 2012 of the year V.V. Putin signed the Federal Law No. 272-ФЗ adopted by the State Duma "On Measures to Influence Persons involved in Violations of Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms, Rights and Freedoms of Citizens of the Russian Federation", known as the "Dima Yakovlev Law" in memory of the two-year-old dead in the US Russian boy, whose adoptive "father" -American locked in the sun at 45 degrees in the car, as well as in memory of all Russian children who died and suffered at the hands of foreign adoptive parents. On the same day, December 28, the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1688 was signed “On some measures to implement the state policy in the field of protection of orphans and children left without parental care”.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    6 January 2013 12: 32
    The response to the American “Magnitsky Act” in the form of the “Dima Yakovlev Law” adopted by the State Duma of Russia caused a flurry of rage in the West. Very correct law! How many children will this law save! I think a lot! This article once again convinces me that money is of paramount importance to the West, so to speak, slavery of our time.
    1. +4
      6 January 2013 14: 32
      Let them rave. The more shit splashing on the western bank the more correct the law or any other legislative act.
      Weaned to receive arrogant Saxons for cabbage soup ... tea since the beginning of the 80s, no one has sent them so frankly to X .. did not send.
      1. S_mirnov
        0
        6 January 2013 15: 04
        Yes, the Americans will be fucked for this mouse fuss, gathered in parliament, expressed their opinion about our deputies, and again went to rule the world. Our orphans give them a damn. This is our journalism presenting this news as something significant. The economic impact of the orphan law is zero point and one-tenth.
        1. gans
          -1
          6 January 2013 19: 02
          if it's fuss, then why are you so mad, freaks
          1. S_mirnov
            -2
            6 January 2013 20: 31
            freaks freak out? Are you talking about the State Duma?
            http://demotivation.me/bftch3qmh46mpic.html
    2. S_mirnov
      +10
      6 January 2013 14: 59
      "Response to the American" Magnitsky Act "" I just can't understand why the "flurry of madness" in our State Duma caused the "Mangitsky Law" ???
      This is the sacred right of Americans to decide who is allowed in and who is not allowed in their country! And if the Americans do not want to let a bunch of Russian thieves go home, then this is their personal affair and Russia, in principle, does not concern us, in this case they do not climb!
      Second question: Why, before the adoption of the "Magnitsky Act", did all the deputies and the president give a shit about the orphans adopted by the Americans? If this orphan law is presented as a retaliatory step to the Magnitskog Act, then the Kremlin's political strategists are simply not very smart people. It would seem that a ban on the import of American meat (with a bunch of properties harmful to humans) would be a much painful blow for America. Or a ban on the transportation of NATO cargoes through Ulyanovsk and Russian territory, or Russia's withdrawal from the WTO, but you never know how to influence America.
      The thing is, I think that the revenues of the Kremlin tycoons are involved in effective measures against America, and no one's monetary interests are infringed on in the orphan's law. America even wins, because spending from the US budget on the treatment of Russian children with disabilities is reduced. Russia also does not financially care for the number of orphans adopted by the Americans is a drop in the bucket. From all sides beauty, no one loses money, but a lot of noise was raised. In short, everyone is satisfied if you don’t remember about orphans, but no one listens to the opinion of orphans. As the orphanages were in poverty in Russia, they will be in poverty.
      Yes, I forgot, the media won, this is a topic for meditation, no worse than Depardieu’s law!
      http://demotivation.me/3pj4m0qamt7gpic.html
      it would be better to think about why the Bolshevik factory was destroyed
      http://www.afisha.ru/article/bolshevik-stanet-muzeem-sovremennogo-iskusstva/?utm
      _source = afisha_city_news
      1. Juga
        +3
        6 January 2013 15: 36
        You yourself read the text of the law then?
        Below in my post its basic principles, you can find ...
        1. S_mirnov
          -4
          6 January 2013 16: 38
          "Article 3

          1. In accordance with this Federal Law, the activities of non-profit organizations that participate in political activities carried out on the territory of the Russian Federation and receive free funds and other property from citizens (organizations) of the United States of America or implement projects, programs on the territory of the Russian Federation, or carry out other activities that pose a threat to the interests of the Russian Federation, are suspended by the federal executive body in charge of developing and implementing state policy and legal regulation in the field of registration of non-profit organizations. The federal executive body responsible for the development and implementation of state policy and legal regulation in the field of registration of non-profit organizations shall send information about non-profit organizations whose activities have been suspended to the federal executive body responsible for the development and implementation of state policy and normatively - legal regulation in the field of international relations of the Russian Federation. "

          Oh my! Once again, the Russian Orthodox Church came in! Again Gundyaeva to run to the GDP to bow, so that from the action of the law deduced, as is the case with Foreign agents!
          1. Juga
            +3
            6 January 2013 17: 11
            That is, you admit that the law is not just "childish"?
            Judging by the started distortions - yes.
            1. S_mirnov
              +1
              6 January 2013 18: 20
              Not "childish" but "orphan"!
              And I do not distort. I was just glad about the dullness of our management link (the dumber they are, the faster they will be dropped). I read the whole law — it was an almost mirror-like answer to American law, I did not see any originality beyond the orphan note.
              What are you getting at? I don’t understand, tell me directly, I will answer directly. what
              1. Juga
                +3
                6 January 2013 19: 05
                I’m not driving anything ...
                I just can’t stand it (you’ll excuse me, I’m so ...) when discussing a topic without knowing its primary sources, in this case, not reading this law.
                Judging by your answer and this phrase:
                If this orphan law is presented as a retaliatory step to the Magnitskog Act, then the Kremlin's political strategists are simply not very smart people. It would seem that a ban on the import of American meat (with a bunch of properties harmful to humans) would be a much painful blow to America. Or a ban on the transportation of NATO cargoes through Ulyanovsk and Russian territory, or Russia's withdrawal from the WTO, but you never know how to influence America.

                I was not mistaken.
                Therefore, I am trying my best to contribute to the consideration of the law as a whole, and not its separate article, the interpretation of which many use as a screen.
                And if:
                This is the sacred right of Americans to decide who is allowed in and who is not allowed in their country!

                That Russia, I think, should not deny itself this ... So we influence symmetrically.
                1. S_mirnov
                  -2
                  6 January 2013 20: 35
                  “Even Russia, I think, should not deny this to itself” Duc, but who argues? just why be modest, why are the Americans limited?

                  "So we influence symmetrically." - and what, the amers tortured in prison some lawyer who defended the interests of the Russian Federation. So we must boldly write about it in the newspapers and show it on TV!
                  1. Juga
                    +3
                    6 January 2013 21: 04
                    Read the sixth article of this law - "who with a sword to us ..."
                    Excuse me, but you steamed with him in the same cell and personally observed his torment? Or "we turn it as we want"?

                    PS Merry Christmas, unbeliever ...
                    1. S_mirnov
                      0
                      6 January 2013 23: 51
                      Yes, Article 6 normally extends the law. But I think that the law was adopted to protect officials, and the children here are so, for the beautiful facade are stuck.
                      "Excuse me, but you were in the same cell with him" - thank God, he did not sit.
                      Do you seriously think that Magnitsky died in the chamber from the throes of conscience?

                      And Merry Christmas to you, be healthy!
                      1. Mikado
                        0
                        7 January 2013 02: 08
                        Quote: S_mirnov
                        Do you seriously think that Magnitsky died in the chamber from the throes of conscience?


                        He suffered from diabetes. According to the testimony of the doctors of the pre-trial detention center, I noticed an exacerbation - hypoglycemia, this is when the head becomes ill, the person does not control himself, the mind becomes cloudy, inappropriate behavior, aggression begins. The duty doctor (domestic medicine, human) was not aware of diabetes, as a result, he decided that Magnitsky would be violent, called a press team, he was abducted, he later died, either from a head injury, or from a pancreatic failure (from due to exacerbation of diabetes), or from all at once. In short, if health is not okay, it’s better not to break the law; medicine is obviously no better in prison than on the loose.
    3. +3
      6 January 2013 19: 07
      I would like to ask, what had to wait for the "Magnitsky Act", knowing about these unrighteous deeds, in order to pass the "Dima Yakovlev" law? Why couldn't this have been done before? It seems that about five years ago, about four years ago there was a report on TV on Shit TV, excuse NTV, about how our adopted kids live over the hill. I remember on the Internet there was a flurry of indignation about this, and it was then necessary to pass a law prohibiting the adoption of children by foreigners, and not wait for our officials to be banned from entering America.
      1. Juga
        +1
        6 January 2013 19: 49
        Well, why, there have been separate attempts, take the Agreement between Russia and the USA on cooperation in the field of adoption of children, which was signed on July 13, 2011.
        The points on the protection of children's rights inscribed there were maliciously not respected by the American side, and the corresponding notes were mentioned.
        So the "act" was just a pretext, not a pretext, apparently they did not know where to write such an explicit prohibition. I think so...
  2. +17
    6 January 2013 12: 56
    Homeland should be responsible for its orphans. If the orphans are doomed to violence, illness, and hopelessness in the receivers - this is the diagnosis of society. Taking children out of the cordon is a way out of the problem, sabotage and sabotage in relation to specific children (and therefore a crime) and the nation in general ... But Dima Yakovlev’s Law forbade the export of children to Omerika, but why not to the West at all? The article gives examples from clinics in Italy, where foreign orphans are spare parts for operations. The same situevina in other capitalist scales. Isn't that why Shaw Silvio and Gerhard are friends, but didn’t get too special with Obamych? In addition, Schroeder was also given the opportunity to adopt a Russian baby ... By and large, it is necessary to revive the post-war practice, and send the boys to Suvorov schools (create the right number), and torturing teachers from the orphanages and socialist camps should be sent to raise the national economy
    1. Alexander 1958
      +4
      6 January 2013 13: 41
      Good afternoon! In my opinion, the adoption of this law is indeed a positive development. but this is only part of the problem. Unfortunately, I did not find statistics, but in a free paraphrase from several articles, the statistics sound like this. In the USA, more Russian children die than in other countries combined. Many American families die in their families. Conclusion - it is impossible to give for adoption in the USA in any case. but to other countries - the question needs to be studied. The reason for this is the problem of attitude to foster children and their children in Russia itself (as well as in Ukraine, too) It's no secret that street children have now appeared, children die in their own families. Therefore, it is worth looking at the problem from such an angle - where a child is better at home or in a foster family abroad, he should be given back there, but he must do everything possible to create conditions that would make the lives of children happy and safe at home. So far, there is no need to give children for adoption only to those countries that undertake obligations to ensure the safety and prosperity of children with the obligatory consent to control by the state-homeland of these children. It is impossible to reduce everything to money (paying large sums for raising other people's children), for this it is necessary to change the attitude of society towards children. In Dneprodzerzhinsk, we recently condemned a family, mother and stepfather, who, upon reaching the child’s 3rd birthday and, accordingly, the payment of money for the maintenance of his child, placed an advertisement on the Internet for the sale of a child for 7,5 thousand euros. Thank God the police reacted on time and correctly, both received a term. And what about the child?
      All these problems exist in any society, but in the USSR they were many times smaller. The conclusion suggests itself ...
      Alexander 1958
      .
      1. +4
        6 January 2013 17: 50
        Quote: Alexander 1958
        Therefore, it is worth looking at the problem from such an angle - where a child is better at home or in a foster family abroad, you need to give there, but work hard to create conditions that would make the lives of children happy and safe at home

        To give children out of the country is a crime, to mock children in their country is a crime, to deprive parents of the ability to restrain children in their country is a crime. Only here who will initiate criminal proceedings, probably Pavel Astakhov, oh how he is a speechwriter.
    2. +3
      6 January 2013 13: 51
      Quote: Aeneas

      Homeland must be responsible for its orphans
      That's right, in America, the laws do not really affect our children - if 100500 services follow their own, God forbid you raise your voice, then you can calmly beat ours and forget them in cars - they’ll just scold us.
      1. lotus04
        0
        6 January 2013 14: 29
        30 November 2001 of the head injuries, “baby shaking syndrome”, and nutritional deficiency died an 1,5-year-old kid from Inozemtsevo (adoptive name Luke Evans, Indiana, “adopted” 6 months before the murder). The foster mother, Natalie Fabian Evans, stated that she could not wake the child that morning and so she dipped it into a bath with water to “stimulate” where the baby “probably hit her head against the bath.” Evans was first prosecuted for the murder, but then (30.06.2006) was officially declared innocent.


        I would "stimulate" this bitch with my head on an anvil. So that there are as few “loving mothers” as possible left in the world.
      2. +3
        6 January 2013 14: 33
        lelikas,
        Quote: lelikas
        That's right, in America, the laws do not really affect our children - if 100500 services follow their own, God forbid you raise your voice, then you can calmly beat ours and forget them in cars - only

        but what's the difference "act" or "do not act". Vapshchet most likely does not deliberately spread rot on Russian children. It's just that Russians or Ukrainians should grow on their land, "they don't need the Turkish coast and they don't need Africa! angry "
        1. +1
          6 January 2013 23: 45
          Quote: Aeneas
          but what's the difference "act" or "do not act".

          The difference is huge - their children are fully protected by the law - ours are there, as it were, on lease - they are given benefits, but the social authorities do not follow them as "original" (that is, they do not follow them at all). It's like (rough but true)
          if you kiss an American, then there’s a lawsuit about sexual harassment, but you are raped there, again the Russians are having fun.
          Naturally, children should grow up with us - but at least with parents or in families or in family orphanages. Keeping them out of America is much easier than ensuring control over their living there and observance of their rights, not everyone gets adoptive monsters — parents and normal families.
    3. S_mirnov
      +2
      6 January 2013 15: 06
      "The law of Dima Yakovlev prohibited the export of children to Omerika, but why not to the West" - because the West is happy to welcome our millionaires (for example, BAB) and the West did not offend our state officials!
  3. Juga
    +6
    6 January 2013 13: 14
    I myself am against the adoption of children abroad, including (especially) in the United States, so this law, in my opinion, is timely and necessary. At the same time, when the assistance promised by the government promised by the adoptive parents from Russia will be even better, more foster children will remain in families in the homeland.
    At the same time, I have a strong feeling that few have read this law in full (Federal Law of December 28, 2012 No. 272-FZ).
    There, the ban on adoption (part 4) is only part of the measures of pressure on the "partners" and, in my opinion, not the most severe. What is the ban on the entry of American citizens and ARREST of their financial and other assets if you violate a bunch of items listed in Section 1 of the law, under which you can bring any US citizen.
    And what about the almost complete ban on non-profit organizations financed from American sources, and the ban on the entry into the power structures of citizens of the aforementioned country?
    Article 6, in general, a song - gives the right to extend the effect of this law to those countries that can accept analogues of the American restrictive "Magnitsky law".
    I think this is the real reason for the howling of "liberoid"-minded citizens, and the part about adoption is used by them as a screen.

    Law:
    http://www.rg.ru/2012/12/29/zakon-dok.html
    1. +1
      7 January 2013 01: 14
      There, the ban on adoption (part 4) is only part of the measures of pressure on "partners" and, in my opinion, not the most severe

      And that’s the whole truth in this, they pressed THEIR pricks in another place, and they’re screaming. Although the Law of Dima Yakovlev is absolutely correct and timely.
  4. +7
    6 January 2013 13: 21
    In no way, I'm not a fan of our sometimes thoughtless thoughts, but for this law I will say a big, human thanks to them !!!
    And even here someone minusanul article.
    1. S_mirnov
      -2
      6 January 2013 15: 11
      Yes, this orphan’s law was adopted only for PR, orphans still don’t care about our power (because it’s difficult to make money for them), and thank you for saying that!
      "On December 28, 2012, V.V. Putin signed the Federal Law No. 272-FZ, adopted by the State Duma," On measures to influence persons involved in violations of fundamental human rights and freedoms, the rights and freedoms of citizens of the Russian Federation. "
      What about freedom of assembly? And on the account that the power belongs to the People?
  5. +5
    6 January 2013 13: 26
    Thank God! Finally decided. It seemed that Russia was paying their terrible tribute to their children.
    1. S_mirnov
      -5
      6 January 2013 15: 20
      No, we pay a terrible tribute to them with our specialists who were raised in this country (sorry in the USSR), trained, educated, and then they left here to live and work in America! And with children, one hassle, lay down, feed, teach.
      Bullshit is everything, it’s easier to carry children from Mexico to the organs, and from South America. Transport costs less.
  6. botur2013
    +4
    6 January 2013 14: 10
    Horror. Like in the bazaar, the boys are five, the girls are three?
    1. S_mirnov
      -4
      6 January 2013 15: 15
      Yes, nichrome, they pay extra for our orphans!
      http://voprosik.net/russkix-detej-otpravyat-na-kavkaz/
      http://rusplt.ru/articles/social/social_1884.html
      1. 11Goor11
        +1
        6 January 2013 18: 49
        You seem to have been quite happy with the removal of the children "they will be better there, dead but free from Putin's Russia", do you think so Smirnov? Although most likely you did not think about them together with all the other liberals, and suddenly, as instructed, you raised a friendly cry, "Bad deputies do not give Russian children to good American murderers !!!!"
        You look so much like our nationalists, for them the same authorities are always bad no matter what decision they make.
        1. S_mirnov
          0
          6 January 2013 20: 49
          Ek, you want to write me down in pendolubi.
          "You seem to have been quite happy with the removal of children" is from what my words do you draw such a thoughtful conclusion? Or are you just adjusting me to a given TV template of the enemy?
          "You did not think about them in any way along with all the other liberals" - liberals are those who pursue a liberal policy, i.e. privatization of state property, private ownership of land, accession to the WTO, i.e. this is the GDP and United Russia and there are librarians. If you think I am from their camp, you are wrong.
          "You didn't think about them in any way" in general, sometimes I go to the boarding school with financial assistance, rarely of course, I hope you also help orphans?
          "You are so similar to our nationalists" - what about your head? You have already registered me as Pindo-lovers, Liberals and Nationalists, what is this for you? everything is the same? You say the words, but what do they mean you do not understand?
          Here's an avatar chosen good.
          1. +2
            7 January 2013 01: 44
            Ek, you want to write me down in pendolub

            And who are you, if not PENDOLUB? Yes, and boast of material help. It’s familiar. Non-profit organizations have always provided financial assistance, you are clearly from these structures. Poor, they blocked his breathing room, soon he will not provide financial assistance with anything. You are an enemy, if suddenly a Russian, then an internal enemy. Thank God, not very smart. Well-read, yes, but not smart. Remember Socrates: Mnogoznanie is not a sign of the mind.

            PS Pindolyub and liberal for me the same thing.

            PS This is not a polemic, this is a statement, and therefore you can not answer.
          2. 11Goor11
            0
            7 January 2013 20: 40
            You are right Smirnov, our nationalists and Russian liberals (of those who want Stalin and go to the white-tape parades), for me it looks the same. Let them have different rhetoric, but the horns stick out the same. They have different methods, but they feed from the same feeder, the goal is the same - to harm the Russian nation. Although most likely to all residents of this region. We understand that the amers supporting the Georgians 8.8.8, in fact, wished them the same as the Russians - as much blood as possible.
      2. Morli
        0
        6 January 2013 21: 56
        that's why they need our orphans, http: //www.youtube.com/watch? feature = player_embedded & v = cQ07o7rpmpI
  7. +2
    6 January 2013 14: 44
    The right law! Our children must live in Russia! I have a family in my neighbors who wanted to adopt a child, because for medical reasons a woman can’t give birth and how many times they haven’t contacted the guardianship authorities, they put barbs everywhere. And here, on you, for a bribe, our poor children are sent to their organs or to soulless amers, to experiments, or to parents in moron. In general, we need to check all the orphanages that did not allow children to be adopted by our Russian citizens and check the directors of the orphanages for bribes from foreigners, how many children they sent for the cordon and judge them according to the severity of the law.
    1. +1
      6 January 2013 15: 57
      Nefig squander our gene pool. You just need to simplify the adoption process in our country by the Russians themselves. Ameri # bloodsucker braids cannot be trusted at all.
    2. Kapitanyuk
      0
      6 January 2013 16: 43
      And first you ask the children whether they want to stay here or not - this is their right to choose. The part of the law regarding adoption is truly flawed.
  8. Anthrax
    -4
    6 January 2013 15: 17
    We do not notice a log in our eye
    According to the materials of the criminal case, Ivanova explained the act by the fact that the girl grew up as a naughty child: she skipped school, stole money and often ran away from home, for which the mother subjected her to corporal punishment. On November 16, 2005, the woman beat the girl for another misconduct, has passed away. Olga Ivanova hid the body of the murdered woman in a sack, threw it into a well and filled it with construction waste. Then she wrote a statement to the police about the missing girl ................
    According to Sergei Dudarev, deputy head of the Tobolsk Investigation Department, during the court hearings, 35-year-old Olga Ivanova admitted her deed and asked not to deprive her of her freedom. The Tobolsk city court found the woman guilty and sentenced him to one year in prison.

    http://www.detkityumen.ru/forum/1497302/
    Sidorova G.Yu. gave birth to a full-term, mature, live-born, viable child. Immediately after giving birth, in the closet of her apartment, she deliberately hit the newborn on the head with an unidentified blunt hard object with the intent to murder, thereby causing her daughter to have a brain injury. Later Sidorova G.Yu. in order to check the signs of life of the newborn girl, she inflicted at least 10 blows on the body with a knife, hoping that the child would react to the painful stimulus with a cry or movement. By her actions, she inflicted 10 stab and cut wounds on the chest, abdominal wall, pelvic girdle, right thigh ... Continuing her criminal intent, Sidorova G.Yu., wrapping up a still living child who lived about 15-30 minutes after giving birth, in a rag, put it in a trash can and took it out into the street, where at that moment the air temperature was plus 2,3 degrees Celsius, and then threw it into the trash can, knowing and expecting that at the above air temperature, the child's death would occur from hypothermia ... Sidorova G.Yu. realized the social danger of her actions, foresaw the possible death of the victim and wished for it. "
    ...................................
    On July 7, the court sentenced Galina Sidorova ... to 2 years probation with a probationary period of 1 year. Under the word "sentence" in this sentence it is written: "In the name of the Russian Federation"

    http://forum.pravmir.ru/showthread.php?t=5966
    1. +1
      6 January 2013 15: 48
      Anthrax,
      In our country, as in any other country, of course, unfortunately, crimes against children also occur.
      But unlike the United States, our justice does not divide children racially or nationally! And the monsters in our country receive real and, in all severity of the Criminal Code, considerable terms, unlike the United States!
      So your vyser does not roll here.
      (Pay well?) winked
      1. Mikado
        0
        7 January 2013 01: 21
        we share justice with the dough, this, of course, is much better. Monsters, you say, get real terms? Surozh Tsepovyaz say this, let him laugh.
        1. lechatormosis
          0
          7 January 2013 04: 03
          SO YOU THIS SAY TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UNDER THE PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA, it was created just for such cases.
          1. Mikado
            0
            7 January 2013 14: 23
            What to say to the council? What does the justice of the dough divide, or that Surozh Tsepovyaz for the massacre a fine of 150 thousand was assigned and released?
      2. Anthrax
        0
        7 January 2013 10: 04
        In the search engine, type-child conditional term murder. conditional terms
        A million articles will come out.
        Unlike the United States, Russia is often given for INTENTIONAL killing of children often.
        And in the USA, our children are immediately given American citizenship and the law protects them as well as all American citizens. The concept of nationality in the USA does not exist.
        1. lechatormosis
          0
          7 January 2013 16: 55
          Well, do not wish out for REAL, we have already passed.
    2. lechatormosis
      +1
      6 January 2013 15: 56
      ANTHRAXA what similar crimes do not happen in the USA?
      In this case, the JUDGE must bear the blame for the soft sentence to the infanticide.
      Your example has nothing to do with foster children.
      In addition, I believe that numerous supervisory authorities and human rights organizations should show themselves here. WHY THERE is so close attention to MAGNITSKY’s death and TO THE DEATH of an unknown child ZERO ATTENTION SHOULD NOT BE.
      1. Mikado
        +1
        7 January 2013 01: 59
        Yeah, not connected. We forbade vile Americans to adopt our children, saved them from a cruel death, now they will go to good kind Russian parents (such as Akalbek Khabirov), perhaps even from here from the forum someone will adopt them, but they will not adopt them, so it's okay, let they live in orphanages and orphanages, the main thing is that the Americans have washed away (the entire State Department, personally). And in fact, what? How many children have Americans adopted from Russia over the past decades? about one hundred thousand, says Mitrokhin. How many of them died? 19. How many of them died due to the direct fault of their adoptive parents? 3-4? During the same period of time, how many adopted children died in our country? 1220. Twelve of them were killed by their adoptive parents. Indeed, with this law, we literally saved (!!!) our children from the horror of life in the United States and left them to live in our paradise, where a bright, cloudless future awaits them. Enough to talk nonsense, nothing terrible awaits our children there, the fact that out of the hundreds of thousands of families to whom their children were given, several stupid idiots were caught, this is the direct fault of our responsible persons, who had to look at whom children are allowed to adopt. And you are still trying to pass the blame on the American judges, it seems that if you were killing the Americans a thousand of our children a year, but at the same time bearing the well-deserved punishment, you would not even blink an eye, because the well-deserved punishment is that, right? Why don't you look at our judicial system? Khabirov, won, adopted a 13-year-old girl and made her his second wife, they didn't even start a criminal case, can we introduce the law "Dima" against our citizens then? Our orphans have a much higher chance of dying from foster parents (in particular from their hands, negligence, poor quality medicine, poisoning) here in Russia than there.
        1. lechatormosis
          -3
          7 January 2013 04: 11
          am Mikado ...... as you can see LOBBY THE INTERESTS OF AMERICANS IN THE USA.
          Following your logic, let us send all of our children to the USA - THERE AS THERE WILL BE A SUCCESSFUL CHILDHOOD ONE, ALL PURPOSE.
          REMEMBER - Russian children are not US PROPERTY and
          RUSSIA is not obliged to deliver its children to the country of legalized PEDERASTS AND GAYS.
          I deeply spit on MAGNITSKY and its masters in the United States as well as on our officials and deputies, and I am DEEPLY SURE WE DO NOT SHOULD DELIVER RUSSIAN CHILDREN for the fun of both AMERICAN and other PERFORMERS.
          1. Mikado
            0
            7 January 2013 14: 24
            clinic...
            1. lechatormosis
              0
              7 January 2013 16: 52
              as you can see it hurt if you without arguments moved to the CLINIC
              Now I understand who I'm dealing with
      2. Anthrax
        0
        7 January 2013 10: 09
        Of course it shouldn't.
        But Magnitsky’s death is not being investigated, the perpetrators have evaded justice, no one has been convicted.
        1. lechatormosis
          0
          7 January 2013 16: 53
          Yeah, and DIMA YAKOVLEV'S DEATH also went UNPUNISHED - the killer of the CHILD IS NOT CONDEMNED.
  9. +2
    6 January 2013 16: 13
    It’s high time to stop entertaining the children of America (they didn’t allow us to print a more correct name for this region), and at the same time a ban would be put on a Europopia. It would be nice to set up our corrupt trash who participated in this ... (there are no normal words) and send them for life-long maintenance (although the gallows would be a more competent decision), but at the same time to establish foreign scum and allow special forces to train suspects in Russian court. It will also be a worthy answer, they are not shy in the detention of our citizens in third countries.
  10. +1
    6 January 2013 16: 45
    Let's remember who is behind the deaths of our Russian children, who is behind the sale of children to organs, which party and with whose filing the law was adopted on the adoption of children by foreigners, who brought a country in which almost a million orphans, who deserve to die, for the death of our children ?
  11. mox
    mox
    +2
    6 January 2013 17: 35
    My request to the US Congress to include in the list of persons involved in the so-called Magnitsky Act:
    1. President of Ukraine Yanukovych V.F. and his immediate family.
    2. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine in full force, both current and previous.
    3. Deputies of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of all convocations, regardless of color — white, orange, red or blue.
    4. Prosecutors and judges in full force.
    5. Oligarchs and businessmen seen in raiding and dishonest business.

    I wish to see how this bastard will spend stolen money on the development of Ukraine and relax on the Sea of ​​Azov!
  12. Fox
    +3
    6 January 2013 18: 35
    mox,
    Quote: mox
    My request to the US Congress to include in the list of persons involved in the so-called Magnitsky Act: 1. The President of Ukraine

    .... here is the same with Russia ..
  13. +1
    6 January 2013 18: 59
    But in the 90s, deputies were surnamed who corrected the law on the adoption of children abroad and on their removal, so I would have to look at this list
  14. +1
    6 January 2013 20: 42
    The right law, enough of the slave trade.
    The law requires an addition to punish traffickers of children, including deputies who have passed a law authorizing the export of children abroad.
    Healthy Russian children, of whom more than 90% of the "adopted" children, were taken out by foreigners on false certificates as sick.
    And Russian adoptive parents were either refused adoption or offered to adopt terminally ill children with genetic diseases.
  15. +2
    6 January 2013 21: 07
    In the USA they are well aware that they are degenerating! Who will give birth to them? Gays? Lesbians? But people are needed! So they got used to buying up children "easy"! Correct law! But having said A, you need to say B too! It is necessary to facilitate the adoption procedure by our citizens, and it is necessary to pay extra for those who adopt, as well as to control the life of children in foster families. During the war, people adopted 10 children and raised them themselves! And nobody died! And orphanages need to be equipped and better controlled! Someone plows, not sparing their time and nerves, and someone steals from children!
    1. Mikado
      -3
      7 January 2013 01: 16
      They have a steady population growth with "gays and lesbians", unlike us "without gays and lesbians"
      1. 0
        7 January 2013 10: 23
        They have a steady population growth with "gays and lesbians", unlike us "without gays and lesbians"

        If Russia allows the free resettlement of the Chinese, Blacks, Arabs, Central Asians, Caucasians and other people, such an increase in population will go that the Yusovites will have nothing to catch.
        But only the standard of living will fall lower than during the war years.
        USAA is already experiencing serious demographic problems of 32 million illiterate, 3.5 million homeless people, including 1 million children.
        Every year, in USA, the population increases by 3 million people, including by 1 million due to migrants, who in USA already have 40 million people 1 / 8 part of the population.
        1. Mikado
          0
          7 January 2013 14: 20
          In "YSA", in general, the entire population is migrants, except for the Indians, and even they came through the Bereng Strait, so it is worth reading about 1/8 of the population. And what nonsense do you think you can freely enter the country and live? That's where they have a wall on the border with Mexico.
  16. Morli
    +1
    6 January 2013 22: 07
    Carthage must be destroyed, watch and remember, when the time comes we ask and for that too http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cQ07o7rpmpI http://www.squidoo.com/drugging-foster-children
  17. 0
    6 January 2013 23: 17
    Quote: S_mirnov
    This is the sacred right of Americans to decide who is allowed in and who is not allowed in their country! And if the Americans do not want to let a bunch of Russian thieves go home, then this is their personal affair and Russia, in principle, does not concern us, in this case they do not climb!


    whom they should not be allowed to do, and so can do without this law .. the question is, they began to indicate to another state how to live

    if your neighbor starts to tell you, you’re not eating the right thing, shit like that, and cook the fried eggs like that. right there

    another state should not tell another how to live
    1. Mikado
      0
      7 January 2013 01: 14
      That is, if a neighbor stops letting you shit at home, then he will indicate how you (not even you, but your whole family) live? Yes, you are a great original, my friend)
  18. 0
    7 January 2013 02: 27
    The law is wonderful ... Only ruined innocent children's lives can no longer be returned. For these merchants of the Russian gene pool to burn in hell, it is desirable even during life.
  19. emelyan
    -1
    7 January 2013 02: 45
    Well, the newspaper True, again and again. I myself work in a county jail in Florida, a policeman brother. Therefore, I know a little what is happening and how. There is nothing special about American children and some kind of non-special relation to Russians. What are the Americans? Russian Americans? Italian Americans? Irish Americans? There are all some kind of emigrants. And the children are all here - the children. All. I don’t want to hear any bullshit about their children, our children. Yes, since 1991, about 100000 Russian children have been adopted by Americans. Yes, almost all of them live a normal life. Yes, there have been cases of murders, there have been inconsequential cases, everything has been and is happening. In Russia, thousands of orphans died during the same time. And of the graduates of orphanages, only one in ten becomes a full-fledged member of society. Tired of hearing that the American government is not doing this, is not doing it. Yes, it can not do anything. Under the US Constitution, the federal government is responsible for defense and tax collection. Everything else is the responsibility of the state government. Including questions of children. And our Foreign Ministry knows this perfectly. Therefore, if you wanted to, everyone would have decided for a long time and agreed on everything. So they do not need nafig. After all, they know how everything is really here. Our representatives are constantly from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, from Interpol come here. Brother translates them, carries yes shows. Cry, gasp. Then you begin to read what they write in Russia, damn it, it takes the hell. They lie, taking advantage of the fact that most of our population has never been anywhere and they only know about America what they are told on TV about America. And they say those who live here themselves or keep their little family or hide grandmas. And howling here was not raised by the Americans. They do not care about Russia. And those Russians who live here and know how things really are. After all, we know what happened. When they realized that those who had already completely gone too far were going to close their road to America, here they remembered about the children. Eagles. And who suffered, 56 American families to whom the children will not be given. Yes 56 children whose families will not. That’s the whole result. And about the children for parts. Yes idiot, the one who wrote it. To the whole world, our Duma has demonstrated cretinism. A disgrace. They hid behind the children. What the hell are they here in this terrible America, bundles of twigs? These thinkers, and bureaucratic miscellaneous. They stole their loot for their loot. Our Foreign Ministry is telling how hard it is for them to track our orphans adopted in America, and when these very children brought a petition to the embassy in Washington, to convey to our Duma, the embassy was happy that the kids had announced and the police had called these very kids they drove to the neck from there. Did you also show this on TV? Damn nothing changes. Thief screaming hold thief. And we have people, damn it sitting, clapping his ears. So far they have been amusing you with this law of Dima Yakovlev, they have passed the law on education. From which the teachers were shocked. And you are at war with America. But the Russian territory of China is given away, already with a whistle.
    1. Doom
      -1
      7 January 2013 05: 59
      Don’t believe him, it’s an agent of the State Department! In the USA, there’s a famine in the besieged Leningrad, so hungry Americans fry Russian children in barbecue shops, and liquid reptilians generally just drink the blood of Russian babies and add to matzo .. (. Italians pizza and Mexicans tortilla .). Well, as the author correctly noted on the organs, and for the experiments, they also let the kids ... Until laughing !
      1. emelyan
        -2
        7 January 2013 06: 41
        Well done doom!
    2. Morli
      +1
      7 January 2013 06: 37
      look at it and then say: Homosexuals spoil adopted children from Russia http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cQ07o7rpmpI
      1. Doom
        0
        7 January 2013 07: 40
        Exactly exactly the experiments are set ... But if you can seriously ruin or maybe not, who are you, a doctor, a geneticist, an endocrinologist, a psychiatrist and saw a diagnosis? They also ruin here http://www.newsru.com/russia/29nov2011/boygirl.html?
        1. Morli
          0
          7 January 2013 08: 20
          look, I have to understand everything if really from the mattress http://www.squidoo.com/drugging-foster-children
          1. Doom
            +1
            7 January 2013 10: 06
            Went what should I understand? you don’t understand anything, yes Pharmaceutical and medical companies like to pump money out of insurance and to abuse drugs, these are features of insurance medicine, but in the United States, unlike Honduras, there are lawyers and doctors who beat billions out of the farm and such stories and inflate such stories and scales and the horror stories that you discovered .. what should I understand?
            And in Honduras, no one will do this, I have a classmate who has both father and mother in 3rd grade !! They put him in a psychiatric hospital for stealing at school, made a vegetable out of him .... and in the United States a lot of lawyers would have run into such a case to investigate lawsuits and scary articles.
            They eat, they eat children, and they will test them with medicines for all tons of tons, g and all fat gays and lesbians on antidepressants, yes it is))
            1. Morli
              0
              7 January 2013 15: 48
              But you don't need to talk about lawyers, it's only in films, anyone in America just runs to lawyers, your whole system is made so that only ooooooooooo rich people can sue, and there is no chance of competing with a corporation at all - they will ruin counter claims, and about freedom words are not necessary la-la-even on the internet, we can inform people through LJ and get through to the UK if anything, but they will quickly defame you, apply a patriotic act, and at least drag them through the courts, let's write that the United States chose a monkey for a second term or "Monsanto" is poisoning people on the American resource and soon you will learn a lot about lawyers, you sit in your Honduras, and so sit
              1. Doom
                0
                7 January 2013 20: 00
                And who do you think these videos and articles, and why spread? Are naive suckers or the victims themselves?))) The same lawyers create a common opinion, they are suing corporations for their percentage, you at least bum they do not care about them they need the money of corporations and not clients in such cases, more precisely, before the trial, as a rule, they don’t It’s more profitable for corporations to settle payments before the court. and you knock on LJ and SK, but rather knock your head on the wall and knock out your shoveling cockerel brains laughing
              2. Doom
                0
                7 January 2013 20: 39
                http://www.youhavealawyer.com/faq/yaz-yasmin-settlement/ вот этой юридической компании например раскажи как им свой бизнес вести специализируются на медицине вышибли по одному только делу 750 лямов из корпорации или вот 350 лямов с пфайзера http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20110209/FREE/110209860 ,ты им покукарекай что надо богатых клиентов и собирать с них деньги а не вышибать из коропраций и прокукарекай про патриотический акт про разорят шельмование своё кокококпок ...ты кого за лоха держишь и впаривашь тут своё кокококо ? а если сам дебил так лучше не кукарекай не позорься .
              3. Morli
                0
                8 January 2013 16: 51
                come on, don't piss with boiling water, I understand perfectly well that a newly-made citizen of the beacon of democracy in the whole world-omeriki must be holier than the Pope in protecting his new homeland, otherwise they will deprive him of the happiness of being an ubermen, and if only you are going, then even more so, that's just those who calls my Motherland-Russia "this country, Raska, Honduras, etc." causes disgust and rejection of any ideas of such an individual, good luck in the new homeland (although any normal person always has one)
  20. Anthrax
    0
    7 January 2013 10: 28
    You can dance in the temple and get two years in a colony.
    You can cover the killing of 12 people, including children, and get off with a fine of 150 thousand rubles.
    You can "drop" a four-month-old child from the fifth floor, so that he will fly as much as 9 meters from the house (try, for the sake of experiment, to throw at least a bag of garbage out of the window!) And receive a conditional.

    All this is our court - selectively humane and controllably unpredictable.
    Alexander Spiridonov, who was arrested on charges of killing a baby - according to the investigation, he threw the child out of the window in a drunken stupor, tired of his crying - achieved a mitigation of the already lenient sentence. In Yakutia, the court gave him a year and a half of imprisonment in a penal colony. The Supreme Court of Russia examined the case and decided that this punishment was excessive and replaced it with a conditional one.
    Yesterday, Alexander Spiridonov was released from custody

    http://www.vecherniy.com/post=9740
    Tyumen received a suspended sentence for the murder of a newborn son

    Today, the Central District Court of Tyumen sentenced 28-year-old Alena Knyazheva. She is found guilty of killing a newborn baby.

    As established by the investigation and the court, in the fall of 2011 Knyazheva in the yard of her house gave birth to a son and threw him alive into the cesspool. The body of a baby was discovered on May 8, 2012 by a woman’s brother when he was cleaning a cesspool.

    http://72.ru/text/newsline/595379.html
    "
    In September, a young woman was found guilty by the verdict of the Koryazhemsky city court that in December last year, being in her apartment, having given birth to a full-term and viable child, she decided to hide this fact from relatives and acquaintances. Wanting to get rid of her daughter, immediately after giving birth, she placed the baby without clothes and diapers in a plastic bag and hid in the room of her apartment on a curbstone behind the TV. As a result, the baby died from hypothermia - a general hypothermia of the body. The court sentenced the young woman: two years in prison probation with a trial period of one year

    http://tk-online.ru/story/za-smert-rebenka-uslovnyi-srok
    The killing by a mother of her newborn child in the Tula region, unfortunately, is not uncommon. Over the past five years, dozens of women have been held accountable under article 106 of the Criminal Code. And although the law provides for punishment of up to 5 years in prison for mother killing a newborn child, in the Tula region the perpetrators of infanticide were never taken into custody - they were always given a suspended sentence by the court.
    So, in 2004, a 27-year-old resident of Severo-Zadonsk was sentenced to three years probation for a baby drowned in a bucket.
    In 2005, the mother of three children from Efremov escaped with a year of conditional imprisonment for the murder of a newborn son: she left the baby in the winter on the balcony, and he died of hypothermia.
    In 2006, a 19-year-old resident of Zarechye avoided punishment for killing a child: the examination recognized that she was in a state of postpartum shock and did not give an account of the actions taken.
    Last year, the Tula Proletarsky District Court sentenced a 20-year-old woman to strangle a newborn daughter to three years in prison.

    http://www.mkarchive.ru/4567.html
  21. Anthrax
    0
    7 January 2013 14: 41
    Type in a search engine -conditional term for killing a child court.
    A million cases will come out in Russia when a Russian court gave a suspended sentence for the intentional killing of a Russian child.
    Both in Russia and the United States for NOT intentional killing give small and conditional sentences.
    For INTENTIONAL murder of a child in Russia, the punishment is often in the form of a suspended sentence.
    But for the INTENTIONAL killing of adopted Russian orphans in the United States, they always give large 10-20-30 years.
    Fortunately, adopted children are rarely killed in the United States.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"