The President made it clear that Russia may withdraw ratification of the nuclear test ban document

99
The President made it clear that Russia may withdraw ratification of the nuclear test ban document

Today, the attention of many major news agencies and media, including Western and especially Ukrainian, is focused on the President of Russia and his speech at the Valdai Forum. Among other things, Vladimir Putin touched upon the current moratorium on nuclear tests.

Speaking at the plenary session of the forum, the President of Russia stated that if our country has an agreement banning nuclear testing weapons signed and ratified, the United States, having put its signature, has not ratified the document to this day.



Vladimir Putin:

We should behave in a mirror manner. Including when it comes to security issues.

Accordingly, the Russian President made it clear that our country could also withdraw ratification of the treaty banning nuclear weapons tests.

Let us recall that earlier the United States announced that the DPRK was allegedly preparing to conduct nuclear tests. The Russian President earlier this year noted the presence of intelligence that the United States has plans to conduct a full-scale test of nuclear weapons.

At the Valdai Forum, the Russian President also touched upon the issue of global security. According to him, at the beginning of the 21st century it was believed that countries and peoples had learned lessons from the wars of the past, but the selfishness and inflated self-esteem of individual world players again led to an attempt to build a world order based on the right of exclusivity and hegemony of one over all others.

The president:

I have already spoken about this publicly. There was a moment when your humble servant simply suggested: maybe we should join NATO? But no, such a country is not needed in NATO. The question is, what else? We thought that we were already our own, as our people say, bourgeois. What else? There is no longer any ideological confrontation. What's the problem then? Apparently the problem is an arrogant attitude towards others. That's the problem, overconfidence.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    99 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +27
      5 October 2023 19: 35
      Or maybe it wouldn’t hurt to conduct a test and show the results in open sources. The world has forgotten about global destruction. At the same time, everyone will understand what modern nuclear weapons are capable of. what
      1. +13
        5 October 2023 20: 01
        As Mikhail Zadornov said - It’s all about the “grandmas”... There isn’t enough of them for everyone, and the “golden billion” is not going to reduce its appetite... And if several more centers of power appear in the coma of the United States, the rest of the world will begin to rob and bend much more difficult... Well, and then, if no one except us has ratified it, then it’s somehow absurd that we comply with this document... It’s stupid to accept obligations unilaterally, so it’s high time to withdraw it...
      2. +2
        5 October 2023 20: 38
        The time has come to live spectacularly on the New Earth! So that people understand more clearly where the United States is dragging the whole world.
        And it is high time to withdraw our signatures from the Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty, which is holding us back with many now inappropriate unilateral obligations. For example, obligations not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries. This is fundamentally inconsistent with the officially recognized in the Russian Federation concept of the use of nuclear weapons, which can be used to prevent the escalation of a non-nuclear armed conflict.
        1. -8
          5 October 2023 22: 33
          Quote: Pavel_Sveshnikov
          And it is high time to withdraw our signatures from the Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty, which is holding us back with many now inappropriate unilateral obligations. For example, obligations not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries.

          China will be happy and will say thank you!
          1. 0
            6 October 2023 15: 13
            China itself is preparing for the resumption of nuclear testing - it is experiencing a serious revival at the old nuclear test site in Xinjiang. Just like here on Novaya Zemlya.
      3. -9
        5 October 2023 21: 49
        Quote: Mint Gingerbread
        The world has forgotten about global destruction.

        There are archival materials with the results of nuclear tests in the public domain. At sea, on land, in the air... For every taste. There is a list of nuclear tests, there are simulators of nuclear explosions. Anyone who is interested in the question can become an entry-level amateur in it in an hour of searching, reading text and viewing pictures.
        And whoever is not interested will, I think, ignore the tests.
        Quote: Mint Gingerbread
        At the same time, everyone will understand what modern nuclear weapons are capable of.

        Unexpectedly - the same thing as nuclear weapons of the past. Nothing fundamentally new was discovered there, it seems.
        I personally think nuclear testing is useless. Seriously, why are they needed? The Americans and Europeans will not be afraid of this - they are fully aware, I believe, that these weapons will not be used against them - they are not fools (they say they have the best education in the world). They'll just conduct their own test. And what? We will not be afraid either - we realize that it will not be used against us. So - my opinion - conducting nuclear tests is - I'm sorry - farting into the air. They will discuss it with the whole world for a week and forget about it.
        In principle, I am not against it. Just why do something if you can avoid doing it with the same result? Russia has other ways to demonstrate its vulnerability to the United States: a Tu-160 flyby of the east coast with a landing in Cuba or Venezuela, training attacks with hypersonic missiles on AUG, breakthroughs of the Faroe-Icelandic border, demonstration of the effectiveness of anti-satellite systems...
        1. +5
          5 October 2023 22: 56
          Quote: Plate
          I personally think nuclear testing is useless. Seriously, why are they needed?

          You should have studied physics at school, and not smoked in the toilet.
          1. 0
            8 October 2023 17: 51
            In physics they talked about how a nuclear bomb works, and not why it must be tested. On the contrary, there was information about this that with the development of computers, full-scale tests were no longer considered mandatory.
        2. +1
          6 October 2023 03: 06
          Agree. It can be done differently. For example. Putin said yesterday that tests of all systems whose development he had previously announced had been completed. This means this also applies to “Burevestnik”. And if so. Launch it through the South Pole. That is, bypassing the missile defense system. Then they will shit themselves heavily and wetly.
      4. +6
        5 October 2023 23: 55
        Another Rita Simonyan. Where do you propose to do this? Over Siberia? I live here and I don’t need such a “gift”.
        1. +1
          6 October 2023 15: 22
          Quote from DrMad
          Where do you propose to do this? Over Siberia? I live here and I don’t need such a “gift”.

          Rita is just a woman, albeit a journalist. In addition, she is Armenian, therefore she is excited by the latest events in her historical homeland and is emotional - her tongue flies ahead of her thoughts.
          We have a nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya, and such tests are carried out underground. So sleep peacefully, no one will disturb you with nuclear tests.
          But the proposed step to revoke ratification under that treaty is interesting and correct - and does not seem to oblige us to anything, and puts us on an equal footing with the United States in this matter, and at the same time gives us a free hand to resume such tests at any time convenient for us.
          Moreover, the United States planned to resume such tests next year. They need to test new ammunition from the new radiochemical plant. So the move to revoke ratification is very timely and successful.
      5. -3
        6 October 2023 00: 11
        Tests can be carried out immediately in Lvov and Vinnitsa. But what’s the matter, the United States has monuments to the testing sites - Hiroshima and Nagosaki, but we don’t have them yet. And a lot of Bandera bio-waste is immediately disposed of - double the benefits of the tests.
    2. -16
      5 October 2023 19: 39
      In 2014, if Putin had the desire, he could have solved the problem once and for all, but “these are their internal problems”! Why show off now? We hit selectively with conventional weapons, we hardly touch bridges and railway stations or junctions! From what we supposedly start Nuclear tests won't give up and won't capitulate. They will simply receive centrifuges and competent specialists in the field of nuclear weapons from the United States.
      1. +12
        5 October 2023 19: 41
        They'll just get centrifuges from the US

        Alas, the United States still does not know how to make centrifuges. Although they honestly tried three times...
        1. -2
          5 October 2023 22: 35
          Now the most productive centrifuges in the world (supercritical with a rotor length of more than 3.5 m) are made by the European company URENCO. Probably the US will buy from her?
        2. 0
          6 October 2023 08: 29
          They probably know another way :) By the way. Can you tell me where I can find information about THREE attempts to create centrifuges at the adversary?
          1. 0
            6 October 2023 10: 58
            Martsinkevich has a great selection of articles on this topic https://geoenergetics.ru/tag/igla/ And in general the site is very interesting.
            Ну - если лучше слушать то вот https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0+%D0%B2+%D1%81%D1%88%D0%B0
      2. +7
        5 October 2023 20: 06
        Lean, oddly enough, the USA has problems with centrifuges and specialists too. Even Brazil has them.
      3. +4
        5 October 2023 22: 59
        Quote: Thrifty
        In 2014, Putin, if he had the desire, could solve the problem once and for all, but

        And I always ask, “Was Russia ready to fight in 2014?”
        1. -1
          6 October 2023 00: 32
          Bravo!
          You're asking the right question right away.
        2. 0
          6 October 2023 03: 14
          The question is complex. it's too late to bay because! Ukraine’s voluntary surrender of the fleet in Crimea and Ilovaisk indicate that Ukraine in 2014 was also ready to fight seriously.
        3. +2
          6 October 2023 08: 33
          And was it ready in 2022?... Yesterday I heard from the “tag” that only now the factories began to accurately line up in Avdeevka, which sharply reduced the shelling of Donetsk and Gorlovka... The remedy appeared only after you know how long.. .
        4. +1
          6 October 2023 09: 00
          Quote: tihonmarine
          And I always ask, “Was Russia ready to fight in 2014?”


          Of course I wasn't ready. That’s why they began liberating Crimea in 2014 without preparation. Without any plan in case everything goes wrong.
      4. +1
        5 October 2023 23: 59
        They gave you a marshal for 3,14 zdezh. And what? Write posts or comments and a new label. Think, then write.
    3. -4
      5 October 2023 19: 40
      There are few extra X-rays in the atmosphere of planet Earth, and also not enough gene mutations in the population. Just look at the LGBT community and the President of Ukraine, not to mention US democracy in the person of D. Biden...
      1. +2
        6 October 2023 00: 02
        Hm. Your, correct, sarcasm was not understood here (not a pony understood
    4. +11
      5 October 2023 19: 43
      Words from the State Department: We support the ban on nuclear weapons tests, which we perceive as the childish babble of a naughty child, and rightly so. Maybe we’ll rush, but not over Siberia, of course. Margarita’s geography is bad. Only we had insults addressed to Simonyan. But in the west her words were analyzed with respect for our country, not a single word of insult or humiliation was said to Russia. This means the information got through. When they are touched, they begin to think. Even in the media. But in the comments they have a blast, just like ours .First, our rockets are all on lamps from the USSR, the CEP is 100 km and they fly every other time and our bonnets are emergency ones, they don’t explode - because their deadline has expired. Maybe we’ll check? The Norgs won’t like it the most. And we should be purple .I remember how in 1986 the chandelier in the apartment was swinging. But it was a scientific explosion 40 km away. That’s why our President said this, there’s a commotion in the White House, where can I find the right punch card to insert Biden, otherwise God forbid he’ll freeze from such news and won't restart.
      1. +5
        5 October 2023 20: 00
        Quote: tralflot1832
        But in the West, her words were interpreted with respect for our country, not a single word of insult or humiliation was said to Russia. This means the information got through. When it touches them, they begin to think. Even in the media.

        How to say...

        “This is true. Ordinary household electrical appliances, car starters, mobile phones, computers will indeed be damaged within a certain radius.”

        Yet an explosion over Siberia “will not disable electronics in America, Europe and anywhere else in the world.”

        It might, however, harm Russians living in Siberia.
        1. +5
          5 October 2023 20: 11
          Military Commissar Kitten. These are comments or excerpts from an article. Many in the West, like in Russia, are not aware that we have a nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya that is being mothballed. It is very interesting to look at it on Google satellite maps, if you know where to look.
          1. +9
            5 October 2023 20: 43
            Quote: tralflot1832
            Many in the West are not aware, as in Russia, that we have a nuclear test site on Novaya Zemlya that is being mothballed. It is very interesting to look at it on Google satellite maps, if you know where to look.

            Canned food can always be recanned. The process of conservation itself implies re-preservation.
            And if we adhere to academic science, then the Novaya Zemlya archipelago belongs to the continental plate on which the West Siberian Plain is located, that is, the West Siberian tectonic plate. Accordingly, Novaya Zemlya is Siberia.
            1. -2
              5 October 2023 21: 26
              Quote: Michael
              Canned food can always be recanned

              What does this even matter? Isn’t it possible to fuck without conservation? But in Washington there is no test site at all. So what now? Will a nuclear missile not hit there?
              1. +1
                6 October 2023 11: 24
                What an enchanting work of the mind, write more
            2. +1
              6 October 2023 07: 40
              Learn the materiel, New Land is the Urals!!!!
              1. 0
                7 October 2023 01: 12
                Quote from Atlas100
                Learn the materiel, New Land is the Urals!!!!

                What is the Ural Ridge? The place of collision of two tectonic plates, as a result, is the Ural Range itself, the Central Russian Upland and the West Siberian Plain.
                And Novaya Zemlya is precisely on the West Siberian tectonic plate.
        2. 0
          6 October 2023 00: 04
          Kitty, well, not everyone is as “smart” as you. Tolmach would. I can cram quotes myself.
      2. +14
        5 October 2023 20: 17
        But in the comments they have a blast, just like us

        After the first use of Caliber missiles against ISIS in Syria from the Caspian Sea, I accidentally came across the website and read the comments on this case. One of the comments was “brilliant”: “The Caliber has too long a flight range, this missile is simply will fly over through Ukraine." lol Now they don’t think so, I hope, having received numerous arrivals.
        1. +11
          5 October 2023 20: 37
          Leshak. Caliber first flies in a circle over Ukraine, exhausting its maximum mileage, and then goes to the target. wassat
      3. +3
        5 October 2023 23: 05
        Quote: tralflot1832
        where to find the necessary punch card to insert Biden, otherwise God forbid from such news it will freeze and not restart.

        No card will help Biden, his RAM is dead and his fan is acting up.
        1. +2
          6 October 2023 00: 07
          That's right with the cooler. Damn, if it dies and doesn’t blow, it’s overheating.
    5. +4
      5 October 2023 19: 52
      For the Japs, duplicate a couple of trial kids, they are used to it and are no longer offended.
      1. -1
        5 October 2023 19: 56
        It's useful for them. Our Hokkaido bothers them and interferes with them. And so you see, he will respond and return to Russia.
      2. man
        +1
        5 October 2023 20: 07
        For the Japs, duplicate a couple of trial kids, they are used to it and are no longer offended.
        Yeah, and Ursula will immediately blame the states for this
        1. +2
          5 October 2023 21: 28
          Yeah, and Ursula will immediately blame the states for this
          Of course, because Ursula is always on the side of the strong.
      3. +7
        5 October 2023 20: 50
        They even say thank you now. “Thank you for stopping the war with your nuclear strikes, otherwise even more of us would have died.” It's amazing how easy it is to brainwash people!
        1. +2
          5 October 2023 21: 33
          So the Germans in interviews say something like: “Thank you for demolishing our cities and bombing us: you stopped the war, we ourselves forced you to do this to us.” Totally screwed. To what extent should we hate ourselves? And it was some old man who spoke, not a young German. I hope that at least the young people have their brains in place.
      4. +2
        6 October 2023 00: 08
        Yeah, but they want to fish in our waters
    6. +4
      5 October 2023 19: 55
      Will there be a test over Lvov?
      Fire.
      1. 0
        6 October 2023 00: 11
        Poseidon is better. Mmmmy sssmessage is sad.
    7. -4
      5 October 2023 19: 57
      Very red and very thick line!
      At the same time, the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council emphasized, Russia does not refuse negotiations, but only on its own terms,
      1. man
        +4
        5 October 2023 20: 10
        Very red and very thick line!
        We’re already used to all kinds, including super-red-fat ones, so you’re trying in vain
      2. +2
        5 October 2023 21: 24
        What exactly do you not like? Do you know what conditions are in Russia?
    8. +12
      5 October 2023 20: 02
      The President made it clearthat Russia may withdraw ratification of the nuclear test ban document

      Thus, instead of recalling, withdrawing, stopping, stopping, canceling, etc., he continues to interpret the concepts... How scared everyone was and rushed to back down...
      And all this is demonstrated to us in the form of a manifestation of iron will?
      Oh, you know what...
      There is, for example, a way to put the same US on its ears by canceling the shameful Gorbachev-Shevardnadze agreement...
      Or, due to Norway’s unfriendly policy, cancel Medvedev’s gift of 175 sq. km of sea space...
      It is possible, in the end, in connection with the arrest of the ZRV, to stop paying debts or to break trade agreements with Europe, which has gone to the edge, and to deal with the property of thieves living there, but considered Russian businessmen, who have appropriated the rights to own Russia and its riches...
      So that the world can see that Putin does not distinguish between international bandits and thieves and home-grown unscrupulous speculators...
      How else?
      1. +4
        5 October 2023 20: 22
        Ross42What’s shameful about the Medvedev Norway agreement? This dispute dates back to Soviet times and is territorially resolved in our favor, shish norgam and not gas. The Shtokman field is in our economic zone. We didn’t manage to develop it with norgs, so we’ll leave it to our grandchildren. But fish is a water thing, we can’t only enter the Norwegian waterways. The Norges even allowed servicing of Russian trawlers under the Russian flag on Spitsbergen in Barentsburg and the transshipment of fish too. Marine traffic shows that our fishermen simply “shave” the Norwegian waterways with trawls 1 kilometer away. And in this area, which Medvedev “donated” simply the pandemonium of our fishermen working on these fish sales. As I found out, under the USSR there was a subsidy for fishermen of 37% of all costs. Therefore, the fish was relatively cheap.
      2. -1
        5 October 2023 21: 38
        Quote: ROSS 42
        It is possible, in the end, in connection with the arrest of the ZRV, to stop paying debts or to break trade agreements with Europe, which has gone to the edge, and to deal with the property of thieves living there, but considered Russian businessmen, who have appropriated the rights to own Russia and its riches...

        Are you quite right? But it’s okay that Russia continues active foreign trade, isn’t it? Including with the same Western countries. Let me remind you that in our country there are problems with microelectronics, problems with computer components, problems with circuitry in general, at a military enterprise they use Microsoft Office, we import Chinese consumer goods in the absence of our own, we buy raw materials for nuclear fuel in Kazakhstan... I’m not saying that this bad (and I don’t think so) - it is. If we stop paying our obligations, and even break off trade relations with suppliers of important goods, do you think it will become easier to fight?
        Iron will is not “rushing forward with your saber drawn.”
      3. 0
        6 October 2023 00: 14
        Oh, how much you wrote. Let’s go ahead and cancel the pension reform (I’m not a supporter of it, I’m still waiting for it)
    9. +6
      5 October 2023 20: 08
      If you conduct nuclear tests, then it must be done suddenly and extremely effectively.
      Who needs to know everything about the effectiveness of nuclear weapons. But it would be nice to amaze the “shinarmass” with all sorts of cosmic effects. Therefore, the launch of some “Progress” with the appropriate device and an “unforeseen accident” in orbit with the extinction of satellites, and possibly the ISS, accompanied by auroras and atmospheric phenomena, can give a SHORT-TERM effect, mixing the cards for the enemy.
      But! I’m tired of writing, the use of nuclear weapons is not an end in itself, but a means of achieving victory. And even such a demonstration must be supported by our large-scale offensive with the complete elimination of the enemy’s armed forces in Ukraine. And for this you need to have 300 - 400 thousand strike and airborne troops + 700 - 800 thousand occupation troops. Not to mention the fact that the enemy must be immobilized by demolishing bridges, dams, warehouses and power plant turbine rooms.
      And all this is not yet visible. While we can see Poland's full-scale preparations for the annexation of Belarus, this development of events will again force us to play second on defense.
      We should behave in a mirror manner. Including when it comes to security issues.

      - Well, it’s just a disaster, the ineradicable record of our leadership! Where are you Ligovka with the slogan: “If a fight is inevitable, strike first!”
      1. -1
        5 October 2023 21: 18
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        Where are you Ligovka with the slogan: “If a fight is inevitable, strike first!”

        Was there a boy?
        request
    10. +7
      5 October 2023 20: 15
      I think about ten years ago, it was necessary to review all agreements and treaties with unfriendly countries. Simplicity is worse than theft. No one in the world works with white gloves anymore. We have natural resources for the West, they are tanks against us. so they have.
      1. +1
        6 October 2023 11: 19
        Why do you think the “tops” are so stupid, simple and constantly deceived, wearing “white gloves”? I don’t believe that a stupid person can get into “really deciding something”, there are no stupid people there... but based on this, we need to look at the situation..
    11. -1
      5 October 2023 20: 18
      This is not enough: it’s time to use it against the Ukronazis...
      1. -2
        5 October 2023 20: 53
        Along the western border 404 would be just right - the logistics of Western weapons supplies would simply collapse.
      2. +5
        5 October 2023 21: 41
        Those calling for the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine, are you trying to imagine possible political consequences at all? Or are you on the side?
        1. +2
          6 October 2023 02: 01
          All political consequences, up to a hypothetical unconditional surrender, will be associated exclusively with our indecisiveness in defending our right to exist, and not at all with some mythical “world public opinion.” What does the average person in Latin America or Africa care about all these “passions about Russia” out of the box?
          The world is ruled by an extremely calculating caste of politicians devoid of a “chimera of conscience”, focused on providing preferences to the employer and stopping threats to him. And the employers are certain global forces that allow the plebs to choose clowns for decorative positions for the theater of democracy.
          So if you are weak, then they will do everything they promise to you, and if you are dangerous, then they will try to persuade you for a reasonable fee not to start the third world war. They see it completely differently: to destroy all the opponents of the Anglo-Saxon world one by one, one by one, but this is such a bummer!
      3. The comment was deleted.
    12. +2
      5 October 2023 20: 40
      The President made it clear that Russia may withdraw ratification of the nuclear test ban document

      When he calls it back, we can talk.
    13. +5
      5 October 2023 20: 54
      The United States has plans to conduct a full-scale test of nuclear weapons.
      So let them be the first to tear. And then you can look at the reaction and act accordingly. The first to knock with a nuclear club will be interpreted as a gesture of despair and will cause the opposite reaction (like Prigozhin’s march) - that Russia is about to collapse and we need to put a little more pressure on it.
      The resumption of nuclear testing will lead in the long run to the fact that everyone will do it and in 30 years it will be necessary to negotiate with nuclear powers like Tokelau and Benin.
    14. 0
      5 October 2023 20: 55
      Quote: Pavel_Sveshnikov
      The time has come to live spectacularly on the New Earth! So that people understand more clearly where the United States is dragging the whole world.
      And it is high time to withdraw our signatures from the Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty, which is holding us back with many now inappropriate unilateral obligations. For example, obligations not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear countries. This is fundamentally inconsistent with the officially recognized in the Russian Federation concept of the use of nuclear weapons, which can be used to prevent the escalation of a non-nuclear armed conflict.


      You are a populist!!!
      It is significant that this was officially unplanned, but on neutral territory or in neutral waters. And without human casualties and physical consequences for other countries.
      With a warning that an emergency situation is occurring and every effort is being made to prevent it.
      Why infect your territory?
      1. 0
        6 October 2023 02: 10
        It is significant that this was officially unplanned, but on neutral territory or in neutral waters. And without human casualties and physical consequences for other countries.

        In many respects it is true, but in the main it is not very true...
        If it was about nothing, no one will notice. Now, if your connection and Internet are lost, and outside the window there are shimmers from indigo to crimson, and then a tornado of the “finger of God” category - then you have a chance to understand where the globalists are driving you, and what it will look like when it starts in earnest.
    15. +1
      5 October 2023 20: 55
      Karaganov is right, the doctrine needs to be changed and unclear definitions should be removed from it. Already now we have all seen drones over Moscow and other cities, one almost flew towards Putin, who knows what charge they are carrying? For this reason alone, the doctrine could be applied. It would be possible, but not necessarily because everything is decided by Putin, not doctrine, all locators, all sensors mean nothing, the main sensor and locator is Putin, our respected president, and he has already missed an attack on the capital and other cities with impunity more than once and only thanks to someone they were not equipped with nuclear charges. The second point is an existential threat, it is also missed because all NATO countries are fighting against us and their allies, the rest are involved in supplies, even China and India, and Putin as the president also defines the threat, and there are no clear definitions. It is necessary to change the doctrine and get rid of all restrictions, increase the number and power, use nuclear weapons on an equal basis with conventional ones against real enemies, and not their servants, and not make the existence of the country dependent on one person, even if it is Putin.
    16. +4
      5 October 2023 21: 19
      Apparently the ghoul has run out of arguments to talk to his friends from overseas. Just as he once threw Nicholas 2 over one place, so did our guarantor. He, like a dog, huddled at his feet all these 8 years, waiting for the owners to suddenly change their mood. Although maybe he is fulfilling the will of his masters and is simply yapping while Russians and other peoples in the post-Soviet space are reduced to 20 million to service the pipe?
    17. -4
      5 October 2023 21: 37
      What will Margarita Simonyan’s detractors say now? Will they change their shoes while jumping or stick their tongues deep down... their throats? However, I know for sure that now, out of impotent anger, they will denounce me with all their hearts for the shame I experienced. laughing

      Here we read the comments of those who did not realize that she was just foreshadowing Putin’s statement:
      https://topwar.ru/227305-v-rossii-dejstvuet-moratorij-peskov-prokommentiroval-slova-simonjan-o-vozmozhnom-jadernom-ispytanii-nad-sibirju.html
      1. +3
        5 October 2023 21: 42
        They give you minuses because nothing comes out of you except diarrhea, something like this, my narrow-minded dissatisfied “Russian”
        1. -3
          5 October 2023 21: 49
          Yes, you don’t like the truth, you stupid tribe of narrow-minded idiots. It has long been known that your fool is worse than your enemy.
          1. 0
            5 October 2023 21: 55
            Quote: Al Manah
            Yeah, you don't like the truth

            If your “truth” in this case is that the statements of Simonyan (“explode a thermonuclear bomb over Siberia”) and Putin (“Russia may terminate the ratification of the nuclear test ban treaty”) are somehow correlated, then I have to disappoint you : they are similar only in the mention of nuclear weapons, everything else in them is strikingly different.

            Learn the materiel, you are our sarcastic one Yes
            1. -4
              6 October 2023 05: 56
              If you do not see the relationship between the abolition of the ratification of the nuclear test ban and the actual conduct of nuclear tests, then studying the materiel will not help you; it will be too complicated for you, alas. request
              1. +1
                6 October 2023 07: 04
                Quote: Al Manah
                If you do not see the relationship between the repeal of the ratification of the nuclear test ban and the actual conduct of nuclear tests

                So far I see the owl that you are trying in vain to pull.

                - to blow up a bomb over Siberia is a specific proposal. Idiot
                - threatening to “terminate the ratification of the nuclear test ban treaty” does not directly imply jerking something right now. Over Siberia, yes.

                Once again: learn the materiel. And the Russian language at the same time - it will obviously be useful for you Yes
      2. +4
        5 October 2023 22: 47
        she was just pre-vocalizing Putin’s statement:


        So what?
        Or, as I understand it, GDP is infallible for you, like the Pope is for Catholics? Everything he comes up with is always brilliant and the ultimate truth?

      3. -7
        5 October 2023 22: 56
        Are you a Simonyan fan? Some woman who sits on government contracts and doesn’t give a damn? And I forgot, they are always carrying some kind of blizzard. I'm completely sick of the nonsense that someone is broadcasting. Find yourself better heroes
    18. +2
      5 October 2023 22: 24
      Honestly, Putin is certainly great for thinking in terms of nuclear weapons, but please think about the people. Is it 100 dollars forever now? Why the hell are you sitting up there and doing nothing to somehow even out the situation?
      1. +3
        5 October 2023 23: 29
        Is it 100 dollars forever now?


        Don't worry so much, not forever, of course.
        By spring there will be 150.
    19. 0
      5 October 2023 22: 44
      and I never doubted that you were theirs, bourgeois
      1. -2
        5 October 2023 22: 54
        What ? Listen, if you criticize, then at least give reasons, and not just to create an additional empty message
    20. -5
      5 October 2023 22: 52
      It’s high time to show Kuzka’s mother to everyone: Ukraine is the best place for this.
    21. 0
      5 October 2023 22: 55
      Retire yourself already, you chatterbox. How sick of everyone you have already been, you are our people’s singer.
    22. -1
      5 October 2023 23: 50
      All sorts of suspicious people have already begun to call this “blackmail with nuclear weapons”
      Simonyan, "experts", Kadyrov, Medvedev, now the President....

      Moreover, the numerous waves of PR in the media about the Ukrainian civilian bomb and nuclear weapons have subsided, leaving nothing (apparently, except for nice pieces of silver in the pockets of propagandists)

      Alas, apparently they decided to raise the rates....
    23. -2
      5 October 2023 23: 56
      It's time: Banderstan must be destroyed.
    24. +2
      6 October 2023 01: 21
      The president:

      I have already spoken about this publicly. There was a moment when your humble servant simply suggested: maybe we should join NATO? But no, such a country is not needed in NATO. The question is, what else? We thought that we were already our own, as our people say, bourgeois. What else? There is no longer any ideological confrontation. What is the problem then? Apparently the problem is an arrogant attitude towards others. That's the problem, overconfidence.

      Now the revelations are gone.
      But what is the fact that the whole country, most of it, has been accustomed to bourgeoisie?
      And the government and its elite are still “turned” to the West.
      1. -2
        6 October 2023 08: 24
        Deceived. The country was taken over according to the behests of Brian Britt. But they didn’t accept me into NATO. Again the President of the Russian Federation complains that he and the elite of bourgeois thieves and swindlers were abandoned.
    25. 0
      6 October 2023 01: 29
      It's time, oh so time. And we need to blow up something on Novaya Zemlya. Megatons by 50. So that Kuzka’s mother is immediately remembered..
    26. +1
      6 October 2023 02: 07
      I hope that we are talking about underground tests.
      They are necessary.
    27. 0
      6 October 2023 06: 45
      The main thing is that there would be something to test and someone to develop (brain drain, you know.... I myself fled from science to the oil industry.. Already in the time of the moon-faced one)... Otherwise we’ll leave the agreement... And that’s it no need....
    28. -4
      6 October 2023 06: 48
      I hope that all reasonable people have realized in 10 years that P.’s speechwriters are not bad (Cheer up and unwind!), but they judge by their deeds. Therefore, let’s take the next populist statements calmly.
    29. 0
      6 October 2023 07: 18
      Of course, everyone still understands that they won’t use 404.
    30. -1
      6 October 2023 08: 19
      Now everything is possible. Some are hell and some are heaven. The process has begun.

      State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin said that the State Duma Council at its next meeting will consider the issue of revoking ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).
    31. -2
      6 October 2023 08: 21
      Quote: Mint Gingerbread
      Or maybe it wouldn’t hurt to conduct a test and show the results in open sources. The world has forgotten about global destruction. At the same time, everyone will understand what modern nuclear weapons are capable of. what


      It makes sense to conduct tests only if there is some kind of innovation, which after testing can be confirmed and surprise observers. Otherwise, this is an expensive empty bunch. As the overlord said, “Everyone is well aware of who has what and who is capable of what.” Breaking a brick over your head to intimidate an upcoming fight only works in the movies...
    32. +1
      6 October 2023 10: 19
      We thought that we were already our own, as our people say, bourgeois. What else? There is no longer any ideological confrontation. What's the problem then?

      In 1952, Stalin answered this question very well. There he explained why the Second World War did not beat all the bourgeoisie against the USSR, but the bourgeoisie fought among themselves. If he had read Stalin, he might have realized that bourgeois Russia would face the fate of France and Britain at the beginning of World War II. .
      But young Vladimir Vladimirovich, not to mention his entourage, did not read Stalin, by the way, like the vast majority of Soviet people then, and this is not his fault but his misfortune.
    33. -1
      6 October 2023 10: 33
      Uh, friends and foes, on TsIPsio!
      In my deepest understanding, the issue is overripe, it is high time to confirm the determination of our actions, despite the clique of the timid False West, by withdrawing ratification!
      But, while another disarming move was made with the queen to kings!!! And to reverse the move with the cancellation of ratification is a matter of hours or days with simultaneous adoption by the Duma, the Federal Council, and the President!
      And the first queen is a king.... "Petrel", who is not in the subject, can rest..
      The second queen is also a queen for breakfast on the weekend... and maybe a little later...
      Ordered, we are waiting....
      Meanwhile, S. Kazhugetovich is holding meetings somewhere nearby at 404..
      Hour X has not come yet??? So who knows, like W. Churchill with his “Unthinkable”...
      I have the honor.
    34. amr
      +2
      6 October 2023 10: 55
      It’s strange, why is there no conclusion that in order to confront the West with their “Golden Calf” ideology, it is necessary to oppose them with your own ideology? We went through some things ourselves, like recent communism, and some things we threw away ourselves... but the fact remains that we stupidly have no ideology, we stupidly don’t understand what we are fighting for? for the Motherland, so in the homeland there is still current and talk about what kind of money, so this is not a question of invented patriotism and love of the motherland..... we have no Ideology!!! we have no meaning to fight, I’m not sure that the meaning of our fight is to destroy Nazism!
    35. -3
      6 October 2023 10: 56
      The ideas of turbo-patriots that the West will freeze in winter or that one nuclear test or one missile on Warsaw is enough for NATO to capitulate are all naive ideas. And by publicly destroying such hopes, turbo-patriots only demonstrate to the West their weakness and unpreparedness for a real fight, even at the cost of their own sacrifices.

      If Russia wants to win, then the only chance is the willingness to sacrifice tens of millions of Russians. This is something that the humanistic-fascist West, for its part, is not capable of. This is the strength of Russia.

      The West has had military procedures in place in case of a nuclear war for 70 years, and it is prepared for it. But how is he prepared for a situation where half the population of Western countries (and half the population of Russia) will die? If NATO capitulates at this point, Russia will gain control of the remnants of its economic potential, while Russia will still have enough nuclear missiles to prevent an attack from China.
    36. 0
      7 October 2023 05: 05
      We need to conduct a test on Snake Island.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"