Military Review

Three American companies received contracts to design nuclear-powered spacecraft

17
Three American companies received contracts to design nuclear-powered spacecraft

The United States began developing nuclear-powered spacecraft, and three American companies received contracts. SpaceNews reports this.


The Air Force Research Laboratory has awarded contracts to Intuitive Machines, Lockheed Martin and Westinghouse Government Services to develop technologies for nuclear-powered spacecraft. The project is part of AFRL's Spacecraft Directorate program, Joint Emergent Technology Supply On Orbital Nuclear Power (JETSON), to build small nuclear reactors that can be used in a variety of satellites and other spacecraft. In addition, they are planned to be used as part of the lunar program.

All three companies were selected back in June 2022, each with their own focus. Thus, the startup Intuitive Machines must develop the concept of a spacecraft with a radioisotope power system, electric or hybrid engine. Westinghouse Government Services will develop technology, analysis, research and study strategies to reduce the risks of implementing a "powerful nuclear fission system" from a "subsystem, spacecraft and architecture" perspective.

Lockheed Martin Space was awarded a contract to bring the technical design of the JETSON spacecraft systems and subsystems to pre-design verification and full overall program development. All three projects should be ready by December 2025

At the end of July this year, NASA and the Pentagon's Advanced Research Projects Agency selected Lockheed Martin's DRACO nuclear engine for the spacecraft being developed.
Photos used:
NASA
17 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Nexcom
    Nexcom 4 October 2023 10: 30
    0
    What device is in the photo? Is this really the same space trampoline made in America? laughing
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 4 October 2023 10: 49
      -1
      Well, nuclear-powered rockets may be an interesting attempt, but the idea of ​​nuclear-powered satellites is something to kill for. angry
      1. Kotofeich
        Kotofeich 4 October 2023 12: 44
        0
        Aaron, what kind of idea is this? And why does a satellite need a nuclear engine?
      2. shikin
        shikin 4 October 2023 21: 09
        0
        Today, a nuclear engine can theoretically be used only in space - low thrust, high specific impulse, long operating time, large mass. Use in launch vehicles, if possible, would be with an open flow core, which would lead to extensive contamination of the atmosphere, if that’s what you meant.
    2. zxc15682
      zxc15682 4 October 2023 12: 08
      0
      The photo shows a Sterling engine.......
    3. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 4 October 2023 13: 27
      +1
      Quote: Nexcom
      What device is in the photo? Is this really the same space trampoline made in America? laughing

      Kilopower (also KRUSTY - Kilopower Reactor Using Stirling Technology[1]) is a NASA project to create a nuclear reactor for placement on spacecraft[2] and intended for operation on the surface of the Moon and Mars, where the use of solar energy is difficult or not possible[3 ][4]. Kilopower reactors must have different powers - from 1 to 10 kW and produce electricity for 10 years or more[5]. A special feature of the device is its ability to increase or decrease its power and thus generate large amounts of energy, unlike RTGs[6].
  2. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 4 October 2023 10: 33
    0
    The British from Pulsar Fusion went further, unlike the Americans
    They are developing a thermonuclear rocket engine and it will also be used as a reactor

    anyone interested, here was an article on VO
    https://topwar.ru/221315-pulsar-fusion-i-princeton-satellite-systems-razrabotajut-termojadernyj-raketnyj-dvigatel.html
    1. vargo
      vargo 4 October 2023 11: 06
      0
      With the same success, you can go even further and develop a light engine. But the fact so far is that the British do not have a ready-made technology for a payable thermonuclear reactor, and without it their work is just trying to come up with something without a key link.
      1. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo 4 October 2023 12: 13
        +1
        in general, everyone has all the military equipment and technologies that do not pay for themselves
        Civil projects are growing from these technologies - which are already paying off
        or shelved until better times
  3. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 4 October 2023 10: 35
    +1
    The United States has begun developing nuclear-powered spacecraft, contracts three American companies received it at once.
    Well, there is a printing press, but Nabiullina doesn’t, so you can work... request
    1. Romario_Argo
      Romario_Argo 4 October 2023 10: 37
      +1
      Nabiullina’s is cooler - digital ruble - you don’t even need to print anything hi
  4. opuonmed
    opuonmed 4 October 2023 10: 36
    0
    it envisages the creation of small nuclear reactors that can be used in various satellites and other spacecraft. In addition, they are planned to be used as part of the lunar program.
    and a hyper with nuclear missiles can carry a strike from space, then no one is waiting! and well done if they succeed with a nuclear engine to conquer the moon to build space bases, etc., etc. !
  5. Rumata
    Rumata 4 October 2023 10: 38
    +2
    A Brief History of Nuclear Propulses.
    I once worked on this topic.
    https://www.forbes.ru/mneniya/493679-draco-v-kosmose-zacem-v-nasa-sozdaut-adernyj-dvigatel
  6. Sergey39
    Sergey39 4 October 2023 10: 54
    +2
    We were criticized and “put a spoke in the wheels” for the development of the Nucleon-Zeus nuclear transport energy module, but they themselves followed in our footsteps and as many as three companies were entrusted with the development of an analogue.
    1. vargo
      vargo 4 October 2023 11: 09
      +1
      It's a classic. If the United States doesn’t like something that any country is doing technically/scientifically, it means they are simply lagging behind in this and want to somehow slow down someone else’s success until they catch up themselves
  7. Ulan.1812
    Ulan.1812 4 October 2023 11: 21
    0
    I don’t understand anything, why do I keep getting messages that I need to log in?
    This is something new? And I can’t give ratings.
  8. opuonmed
    opuonmed 4 October 2023 16: 39
    0
    By the way, where is the Boeing X-37 flying??? and other US devices