Black Sea Fleet naval aviation stopped an attempt to land a Ukrainian sabotage group in the area of ​​Cape Tarkhankut in Crimea

The Kyiv regime launched one of the most massive attacks drones into Russian territory, on the night from Tuesday to Wednesday, more than thirty Ukrainian drones. An attempt to land a sabotage group in Crimea was stopped. This was reported by the press service of the Ministry of Defense.

On the night of October 4, 2023, the enemy attacked three Russian regions; 31 Ukrainian drones were destroyed by air defense systems over the territories of the Belgorod, Bryansk and Kursk regions. Some of them were shot down by anti-aircraft systems, others were intercepted by electronic warfare systems.

Air defense systems on duty over the territory of the Belgorod, Bryansk and Kursk regions intercepted and destroyed 31 Ukrainian aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles

- said in a statement.

Crimea was also attacked; it all started the night before, when Russian air defense intercepted Ukrainian drones in the Sevastopol area and a Neptune anti-ship missile off the coast of the peninsula over the northwestern part of the Black Sea. However, the regime did not rest on this and tried to land a sabotage group in the area of ​​Cape Tarkhankut. A high-speed boat and jet skis moving towards the Crimean coast were discovered by a naval aircraft aviation Black Sea Fleet Judging by the military's report, it was not possible to sink the dry landers, but the landing attempt was stopped.

(...) in the northwestern part of the Black Sea, the actions of Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft stopped an attempt to penetrate into the territory of Crimea by a landing group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, traveling in the direction of Cape Tarkhankut on a high-speed military boat and three jet skis

- declared in the Ministry of Defense.

Comments

[South Ukrainian]

It was necessary to sink it so that they would know that any exit to the sea means death.

[Constantine N]

That’s why they choose small, fast boats that are cheap and mobile

[yuri bakster]

Quote from Constantin N.

That’s why they choose small, fast boats that are cheap and mobile

for each ... there is .... with a propeller, a black shark would tear them apart like a tuzik a hot water bottle

[abc_alex]

Quote from yuri bakster

for each ... there is .... with a propeller, a black shark would tear them apart like a tuzik a hot water bottle

The problem with such landings is that many small targets are difficult to detect. And that’s why the Ka-50 was sent to the museum because the pilot couldn’t find anything in it even at the training ground.
And what would he use to tear them? Rockets? So while he was shooting at one, the others would “spread” across the horizon in different directions. And the helicopters of this competition can only shoot at one target at a time. And how many missiles does he have? 12? And they are guided by the beam. That is, "by hand". Judging by the video of the Ka-52 being used, the target tracking machine works for Kamov and is not that good now. That is, the Ka-50 would have to literally catch each target one by one, turn in its direction, hover and guide the missile to it. I’m not talking now about the fact that the jet ski is much more maneuverable than the usual target for an attack helicopter, just think about how this novel would end if someone had a MANPADS on a jet ski. And don’t be fooled by the Vortex’s advertising range of 10 km. 5 km is the actual range of use of this missile from the Ka-52.

[fruc]

.........according to the military, it was not possible to sink the dry land

This is an obvious flaw, we must try.

[Alex777]

They even showed the prisoner. And the banner was abandoned.

[Stas157]

Quote: South Ukrainian

It was necessary to sink

Yes, this “flotilla” had to be taken prisoner. Or what, it wouldn't work?

[Ilya-spb]

Question for specialists: is it possible to install an anti-ship battery at Cape Tarkhankut?

For protection from enemy boats.

[Nastia makarova]

it will be destroyed very quickly...............

[Arkadich]

They wrote to you

It was not possible to sink the dry land, but the landing attempt was stopped.

[Smoked]

Exactly. Well, they’ll sail over, shoot somewhere or at someone, blow something up. Delov then. Well, a terrorist attack is more than a terrorist attack is less, this is the bread for journalists to show the next people with broken lives.

[Lech from Android.]

Black Sea Fleet naval aviation stopped an attempt to land a Ukrainian sabotage group in the area of ​​Cape Tarkhankut in Crimea

But this could have been done at the preparation stage in Nikolaev and Odessa.
Now Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet are under the constant threat of attacks from landing forces and naval drones from there, and they will not stop until these territories are liberated from the Nazis of Ukraine.

[Saffron]

The only option that will work here is the liberation of territories. Because the landing is carefully prepared by the Ukrainians (I won’t talk about how difficult it is to establish the fact of loading the DRG at night). You can’t send a reconnaissance group there (unless it’s for death), the agents there work weakly. You can also land a reconnaissance platoon on Zmeinoy and ask the Ukrainians not to touch them

[Smoked]

Mmm, now jet skis too. Interesting. It turns out that they have one refueling in the middle of the route, probably? Well, yes, now they only chase after such people scurrying in different directions at speed from a helicopter, only these ones may have man-portable air defense systems not for heat, but for the beam, those British ones with three crowbars in the warhead from which the “president” will not save .

[coinsam]

“Attack on jet skis” is about nothing at all.
Only when you're really stoned can you carry out such a combat order.

[Smoked]

They also said the same about the PG-7 grenade on the drone.

[Dirty Liar]

Is it possible to hang at least a couple of Lancets on those same “Black Sea Fleet planes” that detect these same DRGs? To notice - Lancet launched and be there at least three times a jet ski.

[SovAr238A]

Quote from: DirtyLiar

Is it possible to hang at least a couple of Lancets on those same “Black Sea Fleet planes” that detect these same DRGs? To notice - Lancet launched and be there at least three times a jet ski.

Do you even know what the Lancet is?
How is it controlled, how does it start?
Well, at least take an interest.
You’ve already learned the word “Lancet,” but you don’t understand the meaning.

[Dirty Liar]

Launched from a launcher on the ground. To give speed and height. When launching from an airplane, both speed and altitude are already there, or do you think that only a launcher can accelerate it? Controlled via monitor. Guidance is replaceable and may be different. Aircraft crew - 2 people? Can the second one control the drone for a while?
If it's the Lancet that confuses you, let there be another FPV drone that can catch up with the jet ski.

[Nastia makarova]

getting into a jet ski at speed is a kind of fantasy, no need to write crazy ideas

[Dirty Liar]

Well, I saw how a jeep was hit at speed. The main thing is to get behind. But computer game specialists can’t even do such things. So there is no need to talk about “impossibility”. Difficult? Yes. Impossible? No.
If the manufacturers of the “Ghoul” drone believed that “this is impossible, that is impossible,” then there would be neither a drone nor any devices with which they attach charges from self-made to charges from an RPG-7.
But it’s easier to think “this is unrealistic” and not do anything - yes.

[abc_alex]

Quote from: DirtyLiar

Well, I saw how a jeep was hit at speed.

The video won't show you anything like that :)

Let's do it like a movie. Scenario. An airplane with a pack of Lancets approaches such a group. The operator opens the monitor and prepares the shot. The pilot reduces speed to a minimum. The Su-30 (we don’t seem to have any other new two-seaters) has a landing speed of 250. Slower is possible, but there is a risk of stalling. The operator presses “start” and the first lancet comes off the launcher and falls apart. Why? But because its cruising speed is 80-110, and it runs at 250+. I don’t think the developers included a threefold safety margin in it.
But let’s say it didn’t fall apart. The lancet is flying, it cannot steer at such a speed, again it is not designed for such overloads and will lose maneuverability. So I have to slow down. Let's say the simplest thing - a parachute. Aircraft speed 75 m/s Lancet speed 27 m/s. If we assume that the plane and the UAV follow exactly the same course every second, a distance of approximately 50 meters will form between them. Let me note that the plane must fly at the same altitude all this time at an extremely low speed. I think the pilots will NOT thank you for such an idea :) Well, oh well. The Lancet has a range of 40 km, I assume that upon reaching this distance from the operator it loses control. In general, for most such systems, the limiting factor is not the fuel supply, but the range of reliable communication with the operator. 40 km at a speed of 250 km/h is 10 minutes of flight. That is, if the Lancet circles in the launch area, after 10 minutes the operator will lose the ability to control it. You say, let the plane circle too. But circling at speed close to landing? It's an accident. That is, the operator must find and hit the target in 10 minutes. I don’t think that jet skis are visible against the background of water on the Su-30 radar. 10 minutes at Lancet speed is a radius of 8-10 km from the launch site. This is approximately the area in which the Lancet must “find” and hit the target?
Now remember that the speed of powerful jet skis can reach 200 km/h and in the same 10 minutes it can fly the same 10 km with incredible ease. That is, while you are looking for a target, it will simply leave the range of the ammunition.

There is an option to use the Lancet as a guided missile flying strictly along the course of the aircraft. But then you will have to visually look for all these ATVs from the Su-30 cockpit at an extremely low altitude and speed. Or a guided bomb. But what will you find with your eyes from the cockpit of an airplane?

The airplane is poorly suited as a carrier for the Lancet. A helicopter is better. Comparable speeds, the ability to hover in one place. But again the problem arises that the operator needs a LOT of time to find one single target and hit it.

Let me summarize. You can attach the Lancet to the Su-30. But for this you need to change it quite a bit. And precisely for the purposes described, its use will not be effective.

[SovAr238A]

Quote from: DirtyLiar

Launched from a launcher on the ground. To give speed and height. When launching from an airplane, both speed and altitude are already there, or do you think that only a launcher can accelerate it? Controlled via monitor. Guidance is replaceable and may be different. Aircraft crew - 2 people? Can the second one control the drone for a while?
If it's the Lancet that confuses you, let there be another FPV drone that can catch up with the jet ski.

Your thoughts are thoughts of degradation.
Downgrade thoughts.
A plane that costs nearly $100 million can be equipped with a weapon that is incompatible with it.
Simply because the same Su-30, in general, from the word “in no way” is not anti-sabotage.
To combat such opponents, light attack aircraft such as Tucano or Wolverine are used, light helicopters with attack capabilities, from Cobra to Kiowa, medium UAVs, like Bayraktar, which have optics with a range of up to 50 km, and have a suspension of up to 4 small-sized missiles and can hang in the air for a long time and have a laser target illumination channel for guiding projectiles or missiles with a semi-active laser seeker launched from the shore.
We simply do not have all of the above.
Our industrialists and military could never even think about such a development of events, although the whole world has been working on all these types of weapons for 70 years.

small patrol boats of the Grachonok type. They seem to exist, but after the start they seem to have ended somewhere.

But not the Su-30.
Using the Su-30 is simply hopeless. Hit a fly from a cannon.

You should still be on the Tu-160, load 5000 lancets, and then enjoy the huge ammunition...

[abc_alex]

Quote: SovAr238A

small patrol boats of the Grachonok type. They seem to exist, but after the start they seem to have ended somewhere.

Or a “veil” of larger ships with deck helicopters. The same Ka-52K. Yes, even ordinary Ka-52s, if there are no Katrans. But our fleet is somewhere in the wrong place...

[_simply]

Well, as a last resort, it is possible to use stormtroopers. What do you think?

[Ezekiel 25-17]

Quote: Saffron

The only option that will work here is the liberation of territories. Because the landing is carefully prepared by the Ukrainians (I won’t talk about how difficult it is to establish the fact of loading the DRG at night). You can’t send a reconnaissance group there (unless it’s for death), the agents there work weakly. You can also land a reconnaissance platoon on Zmeinoy and ask the Ukrainians not to touch them

Zmeiny could become a testing ground for nuclear weapons.

[unhappy]

It already looks like a comedy - “landing on jet skis” against the backdrop of heroic music. Hollywood scripts brought to life

[Argon]

I knew many Ukrainians. They are all obsessed with movies.

[abc_alex]

Quote: unhappy

It already looks like a comedy - “landing on jet skis” against the backdrop of heroic music. The embodiment of Hollywood fool scenarios

So they already tried it differently. They tested the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant on barges. Ours sank any large-sized water transport from helicopters and artillery when approaching the shore. And so there is hope that small high-speed vehicles will not be hit by ALL.

[Vladimir80]

Quote from: DirtyLiar

it is possible to hang at least a couple of Lancets on those same “Black Sea Fleet planes” that detect these same DRGs

It’s possible, like any other “Wunder Waffe” with a similar zero result

[Dirty Liar]

What does “wunder waffe” have to do with it? I'm not saying that the Lancet is a mythical "miracle weapon". What is the justification for the zero result?

[Vladimir80]

Quote: South Ukrainian

It was necessary to sink it

Of course we should have, but we couldn’t (!), do you know why?

[Dirty Liar]

Nothing like that, they just said on Channel 5 news that it was sunk.
The media are such media, balabols, damn it.

[Vladimir80]

Nothing like that, they just said on Channel 5 news that they sank

you know, such after-the-fact additions to the news are reminiscent of the “puncture” of the pseudo-patriot deputy Semykin (?), who, instead of apologizing, began to “invent” about hacking his account...

[Dirty Liar]

So what do you mean by this? That Channel 5 will make excuses and say that their account was hacked? They will make it easier - they will say that the presenter made a mistake. I should have said “the saboteurs were forced to retreat by a Black Sea Fleet plane,” but said “the saboteurs were sunk by a Black Sea Fleet plane.”

[Vladimir80]

That Channel 5 will make excuses and say

Of course not, everyone is used to lies....

[KolVisin]

Closer to midnight, four landing groups on three jet skis and one boat set out from the Ovidiopol area south of Odessa in the direction of Cape Tarkhankut.

Only this time, enemy units intended to land northeast of the cape. It was in the area where their reconnaissance group monitored the coast on September 22-23.

❗️Russian border guards discovered four surface objects near Cape Priboyny around 01.22. As a result of the ensuing shooting battle, at least one saboteur was eliminated.

To strike a group of boats and jet skis, a Su-30SM aircraft of the Black Sea Fleet naval aviation was scrambled into the air and attacked the retreating enemy units.

There is currently no exact data on the targets hit. However, out of four craft, at least two reached the Tendrovskaya Spit and the gas production facility and requested evacuation. Through the joint efforts of units of the 31st Air Force and Air Defense Division, the Black Sea Fleet and border guards, the attack of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was successfully repelled.

[Nastia makarova]

Why? enlighten us............

[fuel oil]

At night, by sea, with ammunition and weapons, on a jet ski... So-so pleasure. And on a high-speed PVC boat is no better. This is creating a picture for a report to curators than a combat operation. What do these people eat from prohibited substances if they die , drowning, but continue essentially useless actions?

[Vladimir80]

Quote: Fluoride11

I cannot explain such suicidal operations any other way.

Why suicidal? Was any of the Ukrainians injured or killed? Perhaps they are already walking around Crimea, just as they are walking around the Bryansk region. And you continue to believe the lies in the reports of Mr. K. and other liars.

[Smoked]

You suffocate and make it difficult to look at the sushushniks from above. It says suicidal, it means suicidal. What's not clear. Watch their videos with raids, which they then post, how they gorge themselves on substances, attack, drown, and all that stuff from the maniacal world of fools in the comments.

[Tagan]

Quote: Vladimir80

Why suicidal? Was any of the Ukrainians injured or killed? Perhaps they are already walking around Crimea, just as they are walking around the Bryansk region. And you continue to believe the lies in the reports of Mr. K. and other liars.

The most amusing thing is to read comments like this from pathological liars.
As always, you have no losses. Only Tymchuk-loser ended badly.
Do you have more truthful information?))

[Arkady007]

It's strange how planes couldn't sink inflatable boats. Something here smells more like hype and unprofessionalism.

[Shkworen]

here the following post appeared in the telegram channel of blogger Yuri Podolyak:

so was it a boy?

[astra wild2]

Colleagues, good afternoon. "An attempt to enter the territory of Crimea was foiled" in other words: they scared away the thieves

[I dare to_notice_]

"The enemy attacked three Russian regions on the night of October 4, 2023..."
No need to panic!
This is “Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Russian Federation: All-Russian large-scale inspections of public warning systems will be held on October 4”!..
Every year we check and nothing...
It was sarcasm. If sho...

[Boris Manzhela]

Quote from monetam

“Attack on jet skis” is about nothing at all. .

Is it possible to sail from Nikolaev or Odessa to Tarkhankut on a jet ski? Is there enough power reserve? I think this is some kind of nonsense about jet skis...

[abc_alex]

Quote: Boris Manzhela

Is it possible to sail from Nikolaev or Odessa to Tarkhankut on a jet ski? Is there enough power reserve? I think this is some kind of nonsense about jet skis...

Everything has already been invented a long time ago. And worked out by Somali pirates. The mother ship goes to sea, which can be anything, even an oligarch’s yacht, or an old cargo ship. The main thing is that it has navigation devices and mechanisms for launching the same jet skis. They start from its side.

[Nikolay Dyaglev]

For this reason, dry cargo ships with grain from the Ukrainians move freely along the Black Sea, and at the same time sabotage is being carried out from them

[Escariot]

Quote: Boris Manzhela

Quote from monetam

“Attack on jet skis” is about nothing at all. .

Is it possible to sail from Nikolaev or Odessa to Tarkhankut on a jet ski? Is there enough power reserve? I think this is some kind of nonsense about jet skis...

This is why gas production platforms were seized. Transshipment hub for such raids

[Fitter65]

Judging by the military's report, it was not possible to sink the dry landers, but the landing attempt was stopped.

It's strange though. And here https://topcor.ru/39927-ukrainskaja-drg-iz-13-chelovek-unichtozhena-pri-popytke-vysaditsja-na-zapade-kryma.html?utm_source=topwar.ru They write that

Ukrainian saboteurs were destroyed while trying to land in the west of Crimea. DRG of 13 people...

So who is more ignorant?

[KolVisin]

Here is the latest from Avtershok: “One saboteur was captured. During his interview, it was established that the group’s goal was to take photos and videos of the DRG participants against the background of the Ukrainian flag on the territory of the Republic of Crimea,” the Public Relations Center (PSC) of the FSB of the Russian Federation reported.

The FSB added that the attempted penetration of saboteurs was prevented by employees of the Crimean border department of the FSB together with units of the Black Sea Fleet of the Navy and the Republican Directorate of the Russian Guard.

[Boris Manzhela]

“Special forces of Stugna and Brotherhood, as part of Timur’s special unit of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, landed on the territory of the Crimean Peninsula and inflicted fire on the Moscow occupiers. Crimea will be Ukrainian! Glory to Ukraine,” says the GUR message.
Later, a representative of the department spoke in more detail about what happened during the operation. According to Andrei Yusov, a group of Ukrainian special forces inflicted heavy losses on the invaders in killed and wounded and, after completing the assigned task, withdrew. Unfortunately, also with losses.
As reported by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, a new military operation took place on the territory of occupied Crimea. Ukrainian special forces parachuted onto the peninsula and attacked the Russian military. The department did not say when exactly this event occurred, but published a video in which boats can be seen approaching the shore. The actual combat encounter was not included in this video.
Link to YouTube video:

[Repellent]

Quote: Boris Manzhela

landed on the territory of the Crimean Peninsula and inflicted fire defeat on the Moscow occupiers

Stop strumming, saucepan

[petrol cutter]

What's going on, what's being done! My God...
You live like on a powder keg, however.
I would like to understand, when are massed tank wedges expected to march with the use of mobile pontoon crossings (since they fell in love with it from the very beginning) and other bells and whistles towards the Hero Cities?..
Unfortunately, this is a rhetorical question.

[petrol cutter]

What's going on, what's being done! My God...
You live like on a powder keg, however.
I would like to understand, when are massive tank wedges expected to march with the use of mobile pontoon crossings (since they fell in love with it from the very beginning) and other bells and whistles towards the Hero Cities?..
Unfortunately, this is a rhetorical question.

[Cannon]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Question for specialists: is it possible to install an anti-ship battery at Cape Tarkhankut?

It’s better in Lvov, or in Odessa.

[Cannon]

Quote: Boris Manzhela

The actual combat encounter was not included in this video.

IT (military clash) came out in the form of farting gas from the asses of the Ukrainian heralds.

[Pivasik]

It may be necessary to create “sanitary zones” in places of possible approaches and landings, with mining and technical control