The Russian military ensured the rotation of IAEA observers at the Zaporozhye NPP

The Russian military ensured the rotation of IAEA observers at the Zaporozhye NPP

Another rotation of observers from the IAEA took place at the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant; it was provided by Russian military personnel who met representatives of the organization at the designated crossing point. This was reported by the press service of the Ministry of Defense.

The change of observers from the IAEA took place at the destroyed bridge in the Vasilyevsky district of the Zaporozhye region, this territory is considered conditionally neutral and is located between Vasilyevka, which is controlled by Russian troops, and Kamensky, which is under the Ukrainian Armed Forces. A ceasefire was declared in the area at 6:00 am.

To do this, a ceasefire was declared on the route from the designated crossing point of the observers - a destroyed bridge near the village of Kamenskoye - from 6.00 to 19.00, which was strictly observed by Russian military personnel

- said in a statement.

Before the rotation of IAEA representatives, Russian sappers checked the road, as well as the crossing point. Unexploded ordnance of foreign origin used by the Ukrainian army was discovered. The rotation took place without incident, the parties observed the ceasefire. As part of the new shift, four inspectors arrived at the station to monitor safety at the Zaporizhia NPP.

Representatives of the IAEA have been at the plant since September last year, thanks to them they managed to debunk several Kyiv fakes about the supposed preparation of the nuclear plant for explosion.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      3 October 2023 18: 22
      It is expected that the Ukrainian Armed Forces will begin the next stage of the ground offensive in order to occupy Tokmak, Bakhmut and Kremennaya no later than November. The Ukrainian Armed Forces will use their last chance from October 5 to October 15. The main breakthrough is planned from Velikaya Novoselovka, Zolotaya Niva and Staromayorskoye through Krasnaya Polyana towards Volnovakha.

      Kyiv is actively transferring personnel and equipment partially to the Zaporozhye direction and the main part to the Yuzhnodonetsk direction. Judging by reports from the field, the equipment that the enemy is transferring to the Zaporozhye direction from Dnepropetrovsk is camouflaged - transported in trucks with the inscription “Nova Poshta”. One truck can accommodate up to two M113 Bradley armored personnel carriers. American Abrams tanks, which recently appeared in Ukraine, were also spotted among the columns.

      The first sign of the start of an offensive could be massive attacks on our nearby rear areas and Crimea. Military airfields and ammunition depots, as well as civilian facilities, may come under attack first.

      Military analysts do not rule out that the Ukrainian Armed Forces may try to cross the Dnieper in the Kherson region - a fleet of boats continues to accumulate on the right bank of the Dnieper. One of the thematic Telegram channels predicts that the operation to land troops on the left bank of the Dnieper could take place within a week, while the enemy is not yet ready. The main forces of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Marines are located in the rear areas, as well as engineering equipment. The signal for the start of the operation will be the redeployment of units in the direction of the Dnieper.

      According to military expert, director of the Air Defense Museum Yuri Knutov, such a ground operation, judging by the latest actions of the Kyiv regime and its Western allies, will most likely be carried out in the near future.

      “NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and the military leadership of Great Britain and France recently visited Ukraine,” he says. - We were talking about continuing the “counter-offensive”. An offensive is being prepared in the Orekhovsky, Yuzhnodonetsk and Artemovsky directions. The likelihood that the counteroffensive will continue is very high.
      1. 0
        3 October 2023 19: 52
        Quote from Orange Bigg
        transferred to the Zaporozhye direction from Dnepropetrovsk, disguised - transported in trucks with the inscription “Nova Poshta”. One truck can accommodate up to two M113 Bradley armored personnel carriers.

        You can't hide this carcass in a truck. Width from 2690 mm to ~3060 mm, weight from 11 tons.
        Where are the traffic cops looking?
    2. +1
      3 October 2023 18: 30
      But the principles do not allow these inspectors to enter/exit across Russian territory? It’s definitely necessary through LBS.
      1. +2
        3 October 2023 18: 37
        Yes, because these observers are NATO intelligence officers and it is not at all clear why we are letting them in. It’s the same as letting the Armed Forces of Ukraine in there.
        1. +1
          3 October 2023 20: 06
          Quote from Orange Bigg
          Yes, because these observers are NATO intelligence officers and

          The IAEA did not recognize the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation over the Zaporizhia NPP.
          For them and the “world community” it is Ukrainian. You can see where they enter/exit.
          If the Russian Federation is in the IAEA, whether you want it or not, you will have to let it in.
          Here's an example: M. and Grosse personally considered the visit of the Russians and Chinese to Fukushima inappropriate.
          “Everything is safe there, there is no need,” and the water that accumulated after cooling the emergency units is not dangerous belay and you can simply pour it into octane.
          To the question: if the water is not dangerous, why not pour it over the territory of the country over which “the sun rises”, or pour it into mines (there are many of them in rocky Japan), there was no answer.
          1. +2
            3 October 2023 23: 54
            If the Russian Federation is in the IAEA, whether you want it or not, you will have to let it in.
            To the station, yes please. But across the front line it’s almost like we’re on our own. And if they spank you, then that’s their problem. They don’t want to go through Russia, let them crawl on their hands and knees through the LBS with the slim chance of not crawling at all. And so yes, if they crawl, then we are not against it at all.
    3. +1
      3 October 2023 18: 42
      Why the hell are we letting these spies in there at all? This has already happened - they spied for the Ukrainians in Donbass. Have we danced on the rake enough?
    4. +1
      3 October 2023 18: 52
      What a formidable officer, looking through binoculars! The Eagles are our guys!
    5. -1
      3 October 2023 19: 01
      This is not the IAEA, Churchill came up with it all in 18. The Kremlin has few deals with NATO representatives.
    6. 0
      3 October 2023 20: 00
      Quote: author
      thanks to them, they managed to debunk several Kyiv fakes about allegedly preparing a nuclear power plant for explosion

      I doubt . Just the opposite.
      Completely parasitic and controlled company

      The IAEA team continues to request access to all six turbine sites, one by one, to be able to confirm the absence of any materials and equipment that may contravene the five specific ZNPP protection principles. So far this request has not been approved and the team can only confirm the status of one turbine hall at a time.

      IAEA experts also continue to request access to the roofs of reactor buildings 1, 2, 5 and 6, which they expected to be granted last month. The IAEA is currently awaiting approval for such access next week.

      -They need to be reminded of Fukushima and the draining of radioactive water.
      Ukraine became a member of the IAEA Board of Governors for 2023-2025. during the 67th session of the agency's General Conference, held from 25 to 29 September 2023 in Vienna.
    7. +1
      3 October 2023 23: 24
      The rotation of IAEA representatives is another headache for Russia... Moreover, these so-called “IAEA representatives” are career specialists. NATO services or working for them under a contract, with all the consequences... And in the current conditions of the development of the situation in the theater of operations - very undesirable “persons” in the location of our troops, and even more so at such a sensitive facility....
    8. -1
      3 October 2023 23: 35
      Wow, friends and not friends!
      In general, you are all right, but there are nuances:
      1. The Russian Federation complies with international treaties, including those on interaction with the IAEA through diplomatic channels, otherwise the dogs of the False West will bark, etc. gentlemen - not gentlemen at all, would be even stronger and would be used against the Russian Federation, incriminating non-compliance with international law and other agreements.
      2. Even without False West’s confirmation of the legitimacy of the presence of the Russian Armed Forces at the facility, we can control the actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, diverting some of the forces from the Zaporozhye direction.
      3. There is also classified information that is not subject to disclosure, and therefore these rotations take place with the consent of the Russian Federation.
      I have the honor.
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. 0
      10 October 2023 15: 41
      Quote: Reindeer herder_2
      The IAEA did not recognize the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation over Zaporizhia NPP..

      Now the local (Russian) administration is deciding by law to declare the area a restricted, closed zone and remove civilians from there, which seems to make it easier to defend and control the zone for entry and exit, eliminating concerns about the so-called. "gunners" and other separatists, saboteurs and saboteurs. On the other hand, this step will remove from the Ukrainian side any restrictions on air, missile and artillery strikes on this territory, because in fact, only military personnel will be there.
      So the so-called “IAEA observers” will soon need to move away from there so as not to fall under attack, but they will - don’t go to a fortune teller.
      Well, residents of Energodar, in the context of measures to ensure the safety of the restricted zone of the Zaporizhzhya NPP, need to be evacuated as soon as possible outside the dangerous region, further away, because Three unsuccessful attempts by the Ukrainian Armed Forces to land and storm the coast do not mean that they are the last, and the one who talks about the reactor being impenetrable by bombs is a fool or worse, an enemy.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"