Military Review

A Russian fighter shot down a Ukrainian Su-25 attack aircraft in the Toretsk DPR region - Ministry of Defense

21
A Russian fighter shot down a Ukrainian Su-25 attack aircraft in the Toretsk DPR region - Ministry of Defense

The Ministry of Defense confirmed a strike on the 62nd ammunition arsenal of the Ukrainian ground forces, which led to a large number of fires on its territory. The defeat of the arsenal was also recorded by NASA satellites. This is stated in a new report from the military department.


Another Ukrainian Su-25 attack aircraft, which tried to strike Russian positions in the Donetsk direction, failed to return to the airfield. The attack aircraft reportedly encountered a missile launched by a Russian fighter in the air. All this happened in the area of ​​the settlement. Toretskoye, located on the territory of the DPR still controlled by Kyiv. An asterisk has appeared on the fuselage of a Russian fighter, most likely not the first.

There are no major changes on the line of combat contact, the fighting continues, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are making attempts to break through the defenses in the Zaporozhye direction, regardless of losses. According to the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, since the beginning of the counteroffensive, it was on the Rabotino-Verbovoe line that the Ukrainian army achieved maximum success. At the moment, Kyiv is forming a new strike force, pulling existing reserves into this area. Ours work with artillery and aviation in places of concentration of Ukrainian Armed Forces units. Over the past 45 hours, more than 30 military vehicles, one Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, two armored combat vehicles, and three vehicles have been destroyed. The following were hit during the counter-battery fight: the D-119 gun, the Gvozdika self-propelled gun and the MXNUMX howitzer.

In the Donetsk direction, the enemy launched two attacks by assault groups of the 53rd and 110th mechanized brigades in the Pervomaiskoe area and southwest of Veseloye. He did not achieve success and withdrew, losing up to 190 people killed and wounded, as well as 11 vehicles. For artillery: MLRS "Grad", one M777, two D-20, one "Msta-B".

In Yuzhno-Donetsk, our troops were able to move forward, improving the position along the front line in the Priyutnoye area. It was the Ministry of Defense that reflected in the report yesterday’s counterattack, as a result of which ours took several strong points, knocking out Ukrainian Armed Forces units from them. The enemy lost up to 105 people killed and wounded, two armored combat vehicles and five cars. A Ukrainian DRG from the 10th TRO brigade was destroyed north of Priyutnoye.

On Krasno-Limansky, the enemy launched one attack with the forces of the assault group of the 63rd mechanized brigade in the Chervonaya Dibrova area. Over the course of a day, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 60 military vehicles, two armored combat vehicles, and two D-30 howitzers.

In the Kupyansk direction, aviation strikes and artillery fire hit the personnel and equipment of the 14th and 32nd mechanized, as well as the 25th airborne brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Zagoruykovka, Timkovka and Stelmakhovka areas. Up to 50 Ukrainian military personnel and two vehicles were destroyed. For artillery: one M777, M109 Paladin self-propelled gun, Msta-B, Gvozdika self-propelled gun. In the Ogurtsovo area of ​​the Kharkov region, a warehouse with ammunition of the 1st Special Forces Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was destroyed.

In the Kherson direction, as a result of fire damage, up to 20 Ukrainian military personnel, two vehicles, and a D-30 howitzer were destroyed within XNUMX hours.
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. your vsr 66-67
    your vsr 66-67 28 September 2023 15: 34
    -4
    The Ukronazis have a goal. And this goal is not joining NATO, this goal is to defeat the Muscovites! At least for this period of time. And everyone has a goal, the military, politicians, and the people in general.
    What is the goal of our politicians, military, etc.
    I don’t want to talk about the people, but for the most part, the people don’t care what’s on the outskirts. He talked to young people and casually asked a provocative question about his life. And young people don’t care about this, most live one day at a time! Today they ate, drank, and what will happen to them tomorrow, as they say. Or did I get the wrong youth? Or do we live very far from the theater of military operations? Or is this the policy of the state?
    No answers! It's all sad!
    1. Huarabey
      Huarabey 28 September 2023 15: 54
      +7
      And Russia has a goal to defeat the goals of the Ukrovermacht and NATO to take Crimea, DPR and LPR and prevent NATO domination in the Black Sea. This is what they do.
      p.s. It feels like they are learning a new manual about the “goals” of the SVO. As if on cue, in each topic there are questions about goals)))
    2. fruc
      fruc 28 September 2023 21: 31
      +4
      yours 66-67......Or did I get the wrong youth?

      These are the youth who sip beer and grow bellies. I know other young people and not only young people.
    3. Fitter65
      Fitter65 28 September 2023 23: 48
      +1
      Quote: your vsr 66-67
      No answers! It's all sad!

      Why are there no answers? You set an example!!! Yes, yes, exactly you. After all, you never answered the question of where you “intercepted” American aircraft carriers on the An-12, as a SENIOR air gunner, and where you flew over the Amur at an extremely low altitude. As soon as you answer, immediately become indignant that they are not giving you an answer.
      1. your vsr 66-67
        your vsr 66-67 29 September 2023 07: 20
        0
        If you're so interested, I'll tell you. While the Enterprise was in international waters, we had an aircraft equipped with photography (including ours) raised to photograph the aircraft carrier! Our regiment was the only one in the Far East at that time! The second regiment of our division was based in the Chita region, in Ukurei! All! There was no more VTA in the Far East! You yourself must understand that from Zavitinsk it is much closer to the Pacific Ocean than from Ukurei! But this did not last long; they began to lift TU 16, also from our airfield.
        To your second question.
        At that time, the concept of using aviation at low altitudes was already being worked out.
        We conducted exercises for a mock landing at the Garovka airfield in Khabarovsk. The first and third squadrons of our regiment were distracters. They entered the Khabarovsk air defense zone in the Birobidzhan area at a decent altitude so that they could be detected by the Khabarovsk air defense, and immediately turned back, i.e., left the air defense zone.
        Our second squadron is at a minimum altitude (30-50 m) over the Amur at a speed of 550 km/h (you probably know why such a speed at low altitudes on AN 12, lol ), entered Garovka with an interval of 30 seconds. with landing, opening the cargo hatch, and subsequent immediate takeoff, because the next plane was already on the way!
        The runway was long enough for landing and subsequent takeoff!
        Did you explain everything?
        1. Fitter65
          Fitter65 29 September 2023 13: 09
          -1
          Quote: your vsr 66-67
          Our regiment at that time was the only one in the Far East that flew an aircraft equipped with photography (including ours) to photograph an aircraft carrier!

          The only regiment from the VTA flying An-12s that could photograph the Enterprise good Such an exclusive, the headlines of Western newspapers are full of “An-12 intercepts an American aircraft carrier.” I haven’t found a single photo confirming your nonsense, let alone how the An-12 flies around an aircraft carrier - it would be a sensation in the West, and even here, in the 1st Air Force Army in the KDVO, they would remember ..
          Quote: your vsr 66-67
          You yourself must understand that from Zavitinsk it is much closer to the Pacific Ocean than from Ukurei!

          And from Spassk, Khurba or Mongokhta it’s even closer..
          Quote: your vsr 66-67
          They entered the Khabarovsk air defense zone in the Birobidzhan area at a decent altitude so that they could be detected by the Khabarovsk air defense, and immediately turned back, i.e., left the air defense zone.
          Our second squadron at minimum altitude (30-50 m) above the Amur

          Birobidzhan is not located on the Amur River. This is the first. Secondly, between Birobidzhan and Amur there was at one time the Birofeld airfield. This is the second, and the third main thing, I won’t go far, I’ll start from Blagoveshchensk. So, from Blagoveshchensk to Khabarovsk itself, the Amur River is divided by a border, and flights over it are prohibited in general, and at extremely low altitudes in particular. Well, the little things.
          Quote: your vsr 66-67
          But this did not last long; they began to lift TU 16, also from our airfield.
          Are you confusing white with warm? Let's start with the fact that Tu-16s appeared on the concrete road in Zavitinsk, somewhere in the year 1960, as part of the 303rd BAP, earlier than the An-8 and An-12 of the 930th (separate) transport regiment of military unit 15478, these from 1963. ..
          Quote: your vsr 66-67
          We conducted exercises for a mock landing at the Garovka airfield in Khabarovsk.
          What about Garovka-1 or 2? Okay, don’t worry, the airfield was in the second one. laughing laughing
          Or maybe in Prince Volkonsky? Or the 10th section (Kalinka)? But, okay, when I arrived to serve in the KDVO, Garovka was a purely helicopter airfield, although with a runway of 2300, if memory serves, the Ministry of Emergency Situations was stationed there recently.
          Quote: your vsr 66-67
          at a speed of 550 km/h (you probably know why such a speed at low altitudes on AN 12)
          So why? Probably because the cruising speed was 535-550 km/h (depending on the load). Landing - for the An-12 it turns out to be -200 km/h. The required runway length is 2200 meters. Garovka for the An-12 was scarce even in the 80-90s. So what were you imitating there earlier? In order not to be unfounded, I’ll ask a friend, although he also began serving there in the late 80s, as a flight engineer on the Mi-8. Now civilians are there, though in the Ministry of Emergency Situations. I called... In all my service I don’t remember even one An-12 trying to land with them. Even in an emergency. No permission for the An-12 to land on their runway. No, of course, if you have documentary evidence, and not fairy tales like I remember, then the conversation will be different....Have you explained everything? hi
  2. Thrifty
    Thrifty 28 September 2023 15: 35
    -4
    This is of course good, but when will those Su24s that were converted to carry cruise missiles be destroyed?
    1. osp
      osp 28 September 2023 15: 47
      -2
      This can only be done on the ground, so where are they based if they are discovered in time.
      And with our level of space reconnaissance it is almost impossible to do this - there are few devices in orbit.

      You can't take them in the air.
      If we consider the latest attacks on Crimea, these same carriers were at a distance of more than 200 km and at a low altitude.
      Our radars did not see them at all in this case.
  3. osp
    osp 28 September 2023 15: 44
    -9
    Where is the photo of the wreckage of the downed Ukrainian attack aircraft?
    Or a captured pilot/obituary of a deceased pilot, which is sometimes served in the Ukrainian Cart?

    Of course, this is a subsonic aircraft and its chances of evading a missile are not as great as those of supersonic ones, but anything can happen.

    Ukraine had enough Su-24s, but not so many Su-25s.
    And that number (more than a hundred) of supposedly destroyed Su-25s could not have happened either in Ukraine or in Europe.
    No more than 20-25 of them could come from there.
    That's all. No others.
    And every now and then they fly to the front line.

    If the destruction of an enemy aircraft occurred in close combat with R-73 missiles or a cannon, then there is usually a recording of SAVR equipment - HUD video recording.
    There you can see that the target was shot down and exploded.

    If the R-77 missile was launched at a target tens of kilometers away, then the probability of its destruction is not so high.
    Even at the aiming stage, the Ukrainian flyer’s SPO equipment is triggered from the direction in which he was detected.
    It can either turn on the afterburner if it is a supersonic aircraft, or go beyond the folds of the terrain if it is an attack aircraft.
    1. Uprun
      Uprun 28 September 2023 16: 00
      +2
      From the category of pfuroyeds, give me a photo, a selfie.... To satisfy this citizen’s request, you need to fly to LBS, take a photo and post it. It’s okay that air-to-air missiles destroy a target 200 km away, while on the radar it disappears after being hit, and not after going into folds in the terrain. You need to fly up to a cannon shot to prove the pfuroyed. And where did he get the idea that it was the R-77 missile? Did you hang it yourself?
      1. osp
        osp 28 September 2023 19: 01
        +2
        Quote from uprun
        From the category of pfuroyeds, give me a photo, a selfie.... To satisfy this citizen’s request, you need to fly to LBS, take a photo and post it. It’s okay that air-to-air missiles destroy a target 200 km away, while on the radar it disappears after being hit, and not after going into folds in the terrain. You need to fly up to a cannon shot to prove the pfuroyed. And where did he get the idea that it was the R-77 missile? Did you hang it yourself?

        You are far from the reality of how air battles generally go there at the LBS.

        Our planes try not to stay there for a long time so as not to come under fire from Ukrainian air defense.
        Therefore, there is very little time to capture the target and launch the missile.
        After which the fighter immediately goes back.
        That is, the principle is set and forgotten.
        The fighter's powerful radar can no longer illuminate the target, giving the missile semi-active guidance.
        It flies to the calculated point where its active head turns on and searches for the target.
        It all depends on the distance. If 20-30 km, then the probability of hitting the target is significant.
        If it’s more, it’s insignificant.
        Unless, of course, it is a cruise missile, a helicopter or a transport aircraft.

        It doesn’t matter what kind of missile, it is important that when launching further than 30-40 km, the target must be illuminated by the fighter’s radar.
        Dear Bongo described everything here.
      2. Barmaglot_07
        Barmaglot_07 29 September 2023 18: 08
        0
        Quote from uprun
        To satisfy this citizen’s request, you need to fly to the LBS, take a photo and post it.

        I’ll tell you a big secret - there is such a demonic contraption, it’s called a satellite, a satellite in bourgeois style. Flies over the firmament and draws images. For a couple of hundred American Efimki he will draw any place to order!
    2. faridg7
      faridg7 28 September 2023 16: 03
      +3
      Quote from osp
      Even at the aiming stage, the Ukrainian flyer’s SPO equipment is triggered from the direction in which he was detected.

      It would be very nice if all our opponents thought this way, I give a standing ovation.
    3. faridg7
      faridg7 28 September 2023 19: 54
      +3
      Quote from osp
      Ukraine had enough Su-24s, but not so many Su-25s.
      And that number (more than a hundred) of supposedly destroyed Su-25s could not have happened either in Ukraine or in Europe.
      No more than 20-25 of them could come from there.
      That's all. No others.
      And every now and then they fly to the front line.

      I asked a person how it was that there really weren’t that many of them in Ukraine after the division. The answer was generally this: the Su 25 is an outstanding machine in many respects. Very tenacious, very reliable, a real fighter. A report on the defeat of an air target occurs if the target is hit and the damaged aircraft leaves the battle, it is not particularly important whether it fell immediately or hobbled home. But Grach, after being hit by a rocket or shell, can go home and land quite normally. The machine can be repaired quite well, the designers worked very carefully on the repair issues, so a damaged machine most often quickly becomes operational. So the number of killed rooks may well exceed their numbers. Well, the fact that journalists are buzzing about the destroyed Rooks - jackets, they don’t understand the difference between being shot down and being destroyed. Here you can only understand and forgive
      1. BorzRio
        BorzRio 30 September 2023 15: 12
        -1
        You are slightly confusing - shot down and destroyed are the same thing. To shoot down means to stop its forced flight and drop it to the ground. But a damaged or damaged aircraft is one that was damaged in flight, including as a result of an attack, but was able to land independently on an airfield or other surface.
  4. faridg7
    faridg7 28 September 2023 16: 05
    +2
    I always recognize this face, despite a dim flashlight and an oxygen mask; at the next communication session I will certainly congratulate you
    1. faridg7
      faridg7 28 September 2023 18: 14
      0
      And the photo is old, it was taken in winter. Well, oh well, it’s not often that photos that were not taken at your home airfield end up in an album
  5. Barmaglot_07
    Barmaglot_07 29 September 2023 10: 47
    0
    If I'm not mistaken, the 174th Su-25 destroyed out of seventeen pre-war and four delivered during the conflict?
    1. osp
      osp 29 September 2023 13: 15
      +1
      Yes, that is right.
      Well, it’s true that another 25-30 “Rooks” could have been in storage and could have been restored.
      Hypothetically they could send 15-20 from Europe, no more.
      It turns out that there could not have been more than 60-70 attack aircraft in total there.
      And this takes into account the fact that they still appear above the front line.
  6. Cypa
    Cypa 29 September 2023 22: 41
    0
    Good job! And another one bites the dust (Queen)
  7. BorzRio
    BorzRio 30 September 2023 15: 05
    -1
    This is very good. And for some reason they don’t write that such a SU-35S was shot down on September 29 near Tokmak by friendly fire. They shot down their own! But what about the “friend or foe” system? Even if they were shot down by a MANPADS at low altitude, how can a super modern plane be landed so easily by an ordinary soldier with an Igla?