The Russian military correspondent denied information about a large-scale offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Verbovoy-Rabotino-Tokmak area

15
The Russian military correspondent denied information about a large-scale offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Verbovoy-Rabotino-Tokmak area

The information that in the area of ​​the Orekhovsky section of the Zaporozhye direction, that is, at Verbovoy - Rabotino and further in the direction of Tokmak, a powerful offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is being carried out, does not correspond to reality. Russian war correspondent Alexander Sladkov writes about this.

In the morning, the military correspondent wrote, Russian soldiers from the 42nd motorized rifle division destroyed another Bradley infantry fighting vehicle of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Now the Ukrainian formations are “silent”. Sladkov notes that he does not know what the reason for the calm is, but it is so.



Earlier, Ukrainian sources reported that a very serious offensive was taking place in the Zaporozhye direction. But, apparently, the offensive was carried out exclusively on the information front. Military correspondents' data from the battlefields refute the assertions of the Ukrainian media.

Let us note that for almost four months now Ukrainian formations have been trying to advance in the Zaporozhye and South Donetsk directions. They are suffering very serious losses in personnel and military equipment, but this does not stop the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which probably counts on the success of the offensive actions taken.

True, in four months there has not been much success in the actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Russian military personnel are repelling attacks by Ukrainian formations, preventing them from breaking through to the main lines of defense in the Zaporozhye direction.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    15 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      27 September 2023 07: 55
      The powerful offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine after three months of portraying something sounds just like “powerful old man Biden.” Any offensive cannot last forever; there is an attempt to advance somewhere before winter and gain a foothold; Ukraine cannot dream of any large-scale offensive.
      1. -1
        27 September 2023 09: 03
        Maybe Sladkov is telling the truth, since RIA also provides the usual interactive map for September 26 along the front

    2. +2
      27 September 2023 07: 59
      ...at Verbovoy – Rabotino and further in the direction of Tokmak a powerful offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is carried out, this is not true
      Rogov announced the start of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ offensive in this area with four companies supported by armored vehicles. Was he really in a hurry, which is possible given his ability to often alarm? One reports one thing, the other the opposite, the Russian Defense Ministry is silent, and how to navigate this chaos of “news”?
      1. +4
        27 September 2023 08: 05
        4 companies... that's power...
        the site administration does not carry useful information
        1. +2
          27 September 2023 08: 27
          4 companies... that's power...
          This is not for me, this is for Rogov, who called it powerful.
      2. +1
        27 September 2023 08: 07
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Rogov announced the start of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ offensive in this area with four companies supported by armored vehicles. Was he in a hurry? One reports one thing, the other the opposite, the Russian Defense Ministry is silent, and how to navigate this chaos of “news”?

        There is a lot of news and they are all contradictory, but on the other hand, an attack by four companies can hardly be called a “powerful offensive.” Let's wait for official news.
    3. +1
      27 September 2023 08: 38
      Why should this be refuted by the military correspondent, and not by someone official, who is in the subject, please explain?
      1. +3
        27 September 2023 08: 49
        Because the official authorities are in half that another Carpathian imbecile scrawled on the fence. If you're not too lazy, let him work on refuting rock art. Information from the Ministry of Defense is in the reports of the Ministry of Defense, and it is about the situation at the front, and not about the next counter-grunt of a cheek-biter
    4. +4
      27 September 2023 08: 44
      But, apparently, the offensive was carried out exclusively on the information front
      ...well, with regards to the counter-offensive, there is nothing to attack with, because there is nothing of our own and nothing is foreseen, and Western dosages only aggravate the mood of hostility ... that’s why surrender is becoming more and more frequent ... a recent case when a group, together with weapons and she surrendered with ammunition... and you don’t even have to worry about Banderland’s information field... this field has been based on lies since 14
    5. +3
      27 September 2023 08: 48
      “Sladkov notes that he does not know what the reason for the calm is, but it is so.”

      Maybe the strikes on ammunition depots and weapons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are finally bearing fruit? This must have an effect somehow.
    6. 0
      27 September 2023 08: 50
      The question is not what forces are attacking, but that they are silent about this for now, and when they start talking, it may be too late...
      It is necessary to raise problems in a timely manner, after all, the Ministry of Defense began to make decisions with an eye on the reaction on the Internet, so different interpretations of the same situation is an issue that should be closely examined
    7. -4
      27 September 2023 08: 56
      Be that as it may, sitting on the defensive waiting for “peace proposals” is a dead end. Self-restraint in the use of weapons is a dead end caused by a lack of will and common sense. Eternally looking back at partners (who don’t even seriously think about helping in the LBS) with the fear of becoming an outcast is a military and ideological dead end. This bullshit won't end unless the battlefield is isolated. Now we are fighting according to their training manual.
      1. +2
        27 September 2023 09: 12
        Be that as it may, sitting on the defensive waiting for “peace proposals” is a dead end.
        ..come on, you’re a scavenger...everything is going according to plan...maybe I’ll remind you of the goals and objectives of the SVO
        A..demilitarization of VNAU
        B.denazification of Vnau
        At the moment, we have dealt with point A... the VNA has neither its own equipment nor the military-industrial complex left... and donation may end at any moment
        and at the moment point B is moving forward and very successfully, judging by the rapidly growing cemeteries in Banderland... so you’d better keep quiet
        1. -4
          27 September 2023 09: 56
          Since the spring of 2022, half of the occupied territories have been lost in one way or another, any progress is slow and creaking, the military-industrial complex of the West, as well as the human resource, is not comparable to ours, the saloreikh remains to supply meat, which they have in bulk, i.e. all dreamers, like you, on the topic “Bandera’s followers will end”, “weapons will run out” need to start thinking with their heads and take off their eyes. The worst thing is that such dreamers seem to be sitting in the Kremlin. Where did you read "everything is lost"? It's about taking off the rose-colored glasses and changing methods.
    8. 0
      27 September 2023 22: 44
      I could not find any statements about any "large-scale" offensive, even from the Ukrainians. So, is the article about reassuring that nothing is going on, or is it refuting a claim that doesn't exist?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"