Footage of an airstrike on temporary accommodation points of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Kherson region appeared

Footage has been published online showing an airstrike carried out on temporary accommodation points for militants of the Kyiv regime on the right bank of the Kherson region, occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Apparently, the strike was carried out using a FAB with a UMPC dropped from a Su-34 aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces. The explosion was so powerful that the militants in the building had virtually no chance of survival.

Earlier it was reported that fighters from the Dnepr group of the Russian Armed Forces destroyed a Ukrainian boat with four saboteurs trying to cross to the left bank, as well as a 120-mm mortar crew.

In the Kakhovka direction, the Russian army also carried out artillery strikes on the temporary deployment point of one of the units of the Ukrainian army, as a result of which 13 militants of the Kiev regime were eliminated, another 7 were injured, and three enemy vehicles were completely disabled.

In the area of ​​the islands located near Kherson at the mouth of the Dnieper, Russian artillery destroyed the position of one of the units of the Ukrainian army, as a result of which six militants of the Kyiv regime were eliminated.

Military pilots of the Russian Aerospace Forces previously reported the use of a new Kh-BD cruise missile with a range of 6500 kilometers at facilities in the city of Kupyansk, Kharkov region and the bridge over the Dnieper River in Dnepropetrovsk. It is also reported that the Ukrainian Armed Forces' crossing across the Oskol River in the Kupyansk direction has been destroyed.

Comments

[Siberian 66]

Military pilots of the Russian Aerospace Forces previously reported the use of a new Kh-BD cruise missile with a range of 6500 kilometers at facilities in the city of Kupyansk, Kharkov region and the bridge over the Dnieper River in Dnepropetrovsk.
Destroying enemy bridges is always good... But I hope that this missile was used as a test. (Yes, and that’s what they used - that’s the question). Still, the ranges are not the same in this theater of operations. I would suggest the opposite, the range is 500 kilometers, but the explosive charge is the maximum possible. In the absence of air defense capable of operating at such ranges, that’s it.

[NDR-791]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

Still, the ranges are not the same in this theater of operations. I would suggest on the contrary, the range is 500 kilometers

The wise man looks into the distance... Exactly at 6500 km. And what? A normal Euro nightmare like this, without leaving your air defense

[Shurik70]

Naturally, 6500 km is for a war with NATO; such a range is not needed anywhere else.
So yes, challenges. A new missile requires testing, and what could be better than full-scale testing on real objects with real air defense

[novel66]

So, did you hit the bridge? That's the main question

[rotmistr60]

The explosion is truly impressive and the defeat (destruction) of those in the building is 100%. This is the only way to deal with Bandera - to destroy it.

[Thumbs]

More is needed so that the ground under the Ukrobandera’s feet burns with a blue flame.