Military Review

The SBU is trying to “convince” the New York Times that the publication was “wrong” with the material about the Ukrainian missile strike on Konstantinovka

21
The SBU is trying to “convince” the New York Times that the publication was “wrong” with the material about the Ukrainian missile strike on Konstantinovka

On September 6, a rocket flew into a market in the city of Konstantinovka, in the Kramatorsk region of the DPR, killing sixteen people. The city is under the control of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Kiev immediately blamed Russia for this, and this misinformation was picked up by many Western media.


However, we must pay tribute, there are publications in the West that strive for some objectivity. Thus, the American newspaper New York Times conducted its own investigation into the incident in Konstantinovka and published its results the day before. It turned out that Russia had nothing to do with it, and this is another mistake of the Ukrainian air defense. According to the publication, the market was hit by a Ukrainian missile fired from a Buk launcher, which probably deviated from the target for some reason. American journalists write about this, citing their own sources.

Obviously, this kind of information was not liked in Kyiv. The Ukrainian Security Service considered the results of the investigation of the popular American publication to be erroneous and stated that the strike on Konstantinovka was caused by a Russian missile from the S-300 air defense system. It is said that evidence of this is allegedly the rocket fragments seized at the landing site. The SBU is trying to “convince” the New York Times that the publication was “wrong” with the material about the Ukrainian missile strike on Konstantinovka, despite the fact that American reporters have their own sources who familiarized themselves with the real wreckage and eyewitness accounts, and with data from American satellites.

Today, a staff propagandist from Zelensky's office, Podolyak, also spoke out about the NYT publication, saying that an investigation will be conducted. And a few days ago he stated that there was no need to conduct any investigation, since it was allegedly already clear that “Russia struck.”
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Elis_S
    Elis_S 19 September 2023 16: 39
    +4
    The American newspaper New York Times conducted its own investigation into the incident in Konstantinovka and published its results the day before. It turned out that Russia had nothing to do with it, and this is another mistake of the Ukrainian air defense. According to the publication, the market was hit by a Ukrainian missile fired from a Buk launcher, which probably deviated from its target for some reason. American journalists write about this, citing their own sources.

    The New York Times hung the ukrojunta “by the ear and in the sun”!
    Let everyone know what this Ukrainian government is doing, how it gets out of it and how brazenly it accuses Russia all the time!!!
    1. knn54
      knn54 19 September 2023 17: 00
      +1
      -An investigation will be carried out.
      As Andrei Vyshinsky (Prosecutor General of the USSR) said: “The MAIN MAIN thing is not to expose yourself during investigative actions.”
    2. Mikhail Ivanov
      Mikhail Ivanov 20 September 2023 03: 47
      +1
      The authorities have been discredited in Ukraine! There was Poroshenko, bad, but at least not completely - in the end they chose a buffoon! Only Chapiteau did not follow the path that the voters saw! All the inhabitants of Slegonets are cross-eyed! This is their way of life - to look for kind and generous owners... They chose the jester for one reason - to remove the thief Poroshenko! As a result, we got a thief in cube, if not to another degree...
  2. Skobaristan
    Skobaristan 19 September 2023 16: 42
    +7
    Intrigue. Why now, why did you decide to launch the article? Really curious.
    1. Elis_S
      Elis_S 19 September 2023 16: 55
      +3
      Quote: Skobaristan
      Intrigue. Why now, why did you decide to launch the article? Really curious.

      It’s clear why - the US Congress recently refused to accept the green stuff! Half of the congressmen there are already sick of this clown!!!
      So they started leaking the ukrojunta...to the media, at the summit...
      1. Skobaristan
        Skobaristan 19 September 2023 18: 07
        +2
        I do not think so. True, I proceed from the postulate that Zelensky has absolutely no will and freedom of action.
    2. carpenter
      carpenter 19 September 2023 17: 02
      +2
      Quote: Skobaristan
      Why now, why did you decide to launch the article? Really curious.

      The UN Assembly, so that Zelya would be less likely to “throw a barrel” at the owner and his friends. Zelya received an answer.
    3. dedusik
      dedusik 19 September 2023 17: 15
      +3
      Apparently, the command came from above, so they issued it “to the mountain” bully
    4. Huarabey
      Huarabey 19 September 2023 17: 19
      +2
      It’s surprising that they even decided to publish this and conduct their investigation. What is this? A game of democracy, like they have a free press there and can write things that will cast a bad shadow on the actions of their government? Or are they laying down little by little straws so that if the campaign fails, they can really put all the blame on Zelya and his gang, accusing them of fooling the good Americans and those, out of their gullibility, began to help them? Either they did not see the signs of genocide on the part of Russia, but now they have already seen the Ukrainian missile... Do they not rule out the option of surrendering it back?
      1. topol717
        topol717 19 September 2023 20: 44
        0
        Quote: Warabey
        A game of democracy, like they have a free press there and can write things

        This is partly true, but any article is still someone’s order. Although the sensations in the press have not been canceled! The blow came right during Blinken's visit! And apparently the Americans did not like this divorce. Well, Zelensky’s arrival in the United States and another moment, the election race begins.
    5. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 19 September 2023 20: 30
      +1
      Quote: Skobaristan
      Intrigue. Why now, why did you decide to launch the article? Really curious.

      However, we must pay tribute, there are publications in the West that strive for some objectivity.

      One cannot count on the objectivity of the American media, and the NYT is among the leaders of American “objectivity”.
      But the fact that the article appeared in principle and appeared EXACTLY when the Bloody Clown arrived in Nuyork is significant. In my opinion, this is a good wake-up call for Zee - “Don’t get bogged down with the courts, demands, claims, your own importance. Just like they put you in kings, we can just as easily put you in bunks.”
      They are tired of him, in my opinion. We need something quieter, more efficient and not so greedy.
  3. tank_killer156
    tank_killer156 19 September 2023 16: 44
    +1
    Well, yes, well, yes, Sherliks ​​think that everyone is fools, well, they tried and rubbed the videos, but nothing happened.
  4. Peter1First
    Peter1First 19 September 2023 16: 46
    0
    We have already looked into it, the conclusions were similar, but slightly different from what would suit the NYT. The missile did indeed fly from the west, but most likely it was an American HARM, launched from a MIG-29 of the Ukrainian military forces. Therefore, the NYT, covering up its own, wrote about the supposedly Ukrainian BUK, which is also shrapnel.
  5. bravo77
    bravo77 19 September 2023 16: 51
    -1
    In terms of destruction, this is not an anti-aircraft missile.
    more power
  6. Uprun
    Uprun 19 September 2023 16: 59
    +2
    There will be an investigation, but not as to who hit, but as to who leaked it.
  7. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 19 September 2023 17: 13
    +1
    Is the correspondent already on the Peacemaker's list? Or has he already been taken from NY to Ukraine and being beaten in the kidneys so that he can give a refutation?
  8. digger
    digger 19 September 2023 17: 28
    -2
    Why is it so scary? Are these pro-Kremlin agents weak as peacemakers? A threat to slaughter and punish everyone?
  9. evgen1221
    evgen1221 19 September 2023 17: 33
    +3
    Are people in the West also already tired of the stereotyped bloody shows for the arrival of the next politician?
  10. 2sila
    2sila 19 September 2023 20: 51
    0
    What other objectivity is there?! All the fuss is from the first versions that appeared about the arrival at the Kharma market. The incident was significant, many people died. In Donetsk, Harm flew into the house. So they sent a gang of 6 “pro-CIA officers” to “check.” They checked, Harm was not found. They found Buk and said that they weren’t even remotely to blame. There was much more information about the same episode with Tochka in Kramatorsk, but it’s a shame for everyone. And now let’s face it, the main thing is that they don’t care about them, but which of the subhumans.
  11. Earl
    Earl 20 September 2023 09: 45
    0
    But the publication really made a mistake with its conclusions. Blinken arrived and then, by pure chance, a missile arrived? However, the point is not that the Americans are naive: by admitting the premeditation of the terrorist attack, they thereby admit that they supported the cannibals all this time.
  12. Dedok
    Dedok 22 September 2023 16: 33
    0
    Quote from: Peter1First
    We have already looked into it, the conclusions were similar, but slightly different from what would suit the NYT. The missile did indeed fly from the west, but most likely it was an American HARM, launched from a MIG-29 of the Ukrainian military forces. Therefore, the NYT, covering up its own, wrote about the supposedly Ukrainian BUK, which is also shrapnel.


    they indicated that the destructive elements were from the Buk, as in the Malaysian Boeing...