Military Review

Make it with your kids

60
Make it with your kids
Hanseatic Cogg at sea. Drawing by a contemporary artist



Autumn has come
Dried flowers
And they look sadly
Bare bushes.

A. N. Plescheev

Creativity of parents and children. Autumn has already arrived, and our children have gone to school. They began to spend less time at home, the influence of school, friends and other external environment increased, and ours correspondingly decreased. Meanwhile, we all want our children to become our continuation, to adopt our skills and abilities, our way of thinking, our culture in the broad sense of the word.

And achieving this is both simple and difficult at the same time. For example, children need to read. The truth is banal, but it’s not always easy for adults to find time for this. Again, read books according to age, read what is interesting to children and in addition... read interesting.

You need to play with children, go to the forest, to a river, to a lake, to a museum, to an art gallery, to an exhibition of cats, dogs, cacti, theatrical costumes, tropical butterflies and beetles... Which, again, will require both time and money.

You need to take your child to a cafe and even to a restaurant! Let him learn to behave in public, eat and drink properly. For example, I first went to a restaurant back in 1961, and straight away to Intourist in Moscow, and this did not corrupt me at all.

And recently I was in one of our Penza restaurants and noted how many parents with children were there. Those who came there simply... to have dinner with their family, and not at all to demonstrate any old merchant habits.

And, by the way, it’s not that expensive either. Although... yes, it requires some effort of the mind and wallet.

And, of course, you need to let your child work with his fingers, because his mind is located at their tips! That is, let them cut, glue, maybe even solder, if you have it yourself, work on an engraving machine (although, of course, having one in our apartments is still a hemorrhoid). I had a “Skillful Hands” machine, and there was plenty of garbage from it. But I also made very beautiful things on it, and I spent my time working on it usefully.

But you can also not resort to any difficulties, but make paper ship models together with your son or grandson (girls can also be involved in this, it’s been checked!). And such that they can also swim. That is, so that later they could be launched in your bathtub or on the nearest pond. The technology for making such homemade products is extremely simple, but interesting and accessible to children even in the 1st grade.

Nevertheless, it allows you to make very attractive models. historical courts, in the process of working on which the child can learn a lot, and you, in turn, can talk to him about a lot and tell him a lot!

Well, let's say we decided to start with the simplest (or quite simple) model of the Hanseatic cogg. That is, the trading ship of the Hanseatic League - a union of trading cities in Europe. And it can be said that such ships sailed in the seas washing the north of Europe already in the XNUMXth century.

A novelty was the hinged rudder, which replaced the steering oar in the 30th century, and straight, strongly beveled stems towards the keel - the bow and stern ends of the vessel. The stem ended with an inclined mast - a bowsprit, which served to stretch the sail in front. The longest length of the coggs of the Hanseatic Trade Union was approximately 20 m, waterline length - 7,5 m, width - 3 m, draft - 500 m, carrying capacity up to XNUMX tons.


Seal of John Holland, Earl of Huntingdon, Admiral of England, Ireland and Aquitaine, 1435–1442, showing a cogg type vessel. Encyclopedia Britannica, 1911

It is interesting that many large ships of that time, as well as modern ferries and car carriers with horizontal unloading, were equipped with side ports that served for loading and unloading goods. This allowed them to take cargo on deck and at the same time unload the brought goods through the same port.

In the second half of the 300th century, two-masted and later three-masted cogs appeared. Their displacement was 500–28 tons. To protect against pirates and enemy ships, the Hansa merchant ships had on board crossbowmen and several bombards - powerful weapons for that time that fired stone cannonballs. The length of military coggs reached 8 m, width 2,8 m, draft 500 m, and displacement of XNUMX tons or more. At the stern and bow of the trading and military coggs there were still high superstructures.

In the Mediterranean Sea, two-masted coggs with slanting sails were sometimes found. At the same time, despite all the improvements, coggs remained coastal ships - suitable for sailing only near the coast. Meanwhile, Europe needed more and more spices, and their flow through the Mediterranean ports began to dry up due to the fact that even before the fall of Constantinople in 1453, the Turks captured all the coasts of Syria and Palestine, as well as North Africa.

So the history of this ship is very impressive, and the beautifully painted sail, superstructures and shields on their sides all give this model a very picturesque look.


Starting work on a paper model of a Hanseatic cogg

Well, we’ll start working on it by remembering: the basis of any floating model is the hull. And the most primitive body is a hewn log. So we will make such a “log” from a sheet of thick A4 paper (Fig. A).

From the inside, the ends of the “log” need to be coated with glue for about two centimeters, squeeze them and fasten them with clothespins (Fig. B).

Now you need to carefully knead the middle part of your body blank and pinch the edges, just as you pinch the edges of dough pies. The profile should be similar to the profile in Fig. B. The stems (ends) are cut with scissors along the dotted lines and, if necessary, glued.

You can glue a deck of yellow colored paper onto the hull, lining it to fit the boards. And then use a razor blade or a modeling knife to cut through the ends of the deck according to Fig. G. and bend them inside the body. Paired pins are cut out of 0,5 mm thick cardboard and glued to the body front and back.

Also, the steering wheel (1) and sides (2) are cut out of cardboard and thick paper and glued to the body with nitro glue. By the way, it is now that the outside of the hull should be painted black with nitro enamel, and the bulwark (the side protruding above the deck) should be painted red.

Parts (3) are inserted at the ends, and superstructures are installed on top of them - castles (5, 6) with decorative hatch covers on them (10, 15). It is very important to carefully cut a hole on the deck, place the model on the water and, holding it with your hands, pour ballast into the hull - lead shot or iron nuts. You can fix it by pouring molten paraffin inside! The hole is closed with a decorative cover (20), which is glued to the deck.

The mast and yard are barbecue sticks, and the mast is inserted into the deck while the paraffin has not yet hardened. “Crow’s nest” (7) for the mast, shroud fastenings (6), gate for raising the anchor (3) – all these “details” are cut out and glued together according to the design. How to make shrouds with embossed crossbars is shown in Fig. 5.

The flagpole of the stern flag (one or two at once) is a split straw (1). Well, flags and a sail in heraldic coloring can, firstly, be drawn, and secondly, made using the appliqué method, that is, cut out all the details of its design from colored paper and paste it in place. This work, however, will require skill from you, but no one is forcing you to carve exactly these six heraldic lions, and in addition to them, lilies, when you can carve one single lion in the entire sail. Or even just stick a big red cross on it.

However, today you can do things differently. Don't cut or color anything, but find all these images on the Internet, download, enlarge, and then print and cut out. The look will be very signature!


Completion of the Hanseatic Cogg model

The model is surprisingly well suited for making it with your child at home in a couple of autumn or winter evenings.

But it can also be used as a basis for circle work with children in grades 2–3, so that the best of the works can be presented to students and teachers of grades 5–6, where the history of the Ancient World and the Middle Ages is taught.

A whole collection of such ships can be assembled, because the cogg was of the so-called “round ship” type, and there were many of them in the history of shipbuilding. These are Greek merchant ships, and Roman ones - with a swan's head on a long neck at the stern, this is the same Viking knorr and Mediterranean nao - crusader ships with oblique sails on two masts, and even the same caravels from Columbus's squadron!

In a word, there is room for both your and your child’s imagination to run wild, and the result will be mutual benefit.

Children, after all, are like a bank: the more you invest in them when you are young, the more you get from them when you are old.
Author:
60 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Fat
    Fat 17 September 2023 09: 14
    +2
    hi Vyacheslav Olegovich.
    The model is surprisingly well suited for making it with your child at home in a couple of autumn or winter evenings.
    But it can also be used as a basis for circle work with children in grades 2–3, so that the best of the works can be presented to students and teachers of grades 5–6, where the history of the Ancient World and the Middle Ages is taught.

    In grades 2-3, a child is unlikely to master such a model. At the age of 10-12 years (5-6th grade), all this is quite possible. I judge from my own grandson. There are still problems with fine motor skills, but when handwriting is established, it is quite possible to “dare”.
    For this time I'm keeping a cut of the pirate brig "Jackdaw" on a scale of 1:200. Even I, having experience, have difficulty mastering the larger scale of interesting models, at least “a couple of evenings” for such classes is very optimistic smile
    1. kalibr
      17 September 2023 11: 51
      +2
      Dear Andrey Borisovich! Tested in practice at school, in the 3rd grade, if you first take care of some “semi-finished products”, such a model can be made in two 45-minute lessons.
      1. Alien From
        Alien From 18 September 2023 10: 48
        0
        Oh Vyacheslav Olegovich! And at the age of 10, my grandfather immediately set me up to build a chicken coop, for which I am still grateful to him to this day. hi )))
    2. TANKISTONE
      TANKISTONE 19 September 2023 21: 08
      0
      Tolstoy (Pestrikov Andrey Borisovich) I judge from my own grandson.
      I propose: From the EBN-Center, create an All-Russian Center for Children and Youth Creativity, following the example of Artek, so that Comrade Shpakovsky can “expand” there in the creative education of children and youth. I remember many of Vyacheslav’s notes from childhood from the magazines “TM”, “UT”, and various applications...
  2. 3x3zsave
    3x3zsave 17 September 2023 09: 39
    +3
    work on an engraving machine (although, of course, having one in our apartments is still a hemorrhoid).
    Vyacheslav Olegovich, don’t make people laugh. Modern electric engravers fit into a razor bag and cost about the same as these accessories.
    1. kalibr
      17 September 2023 11: 59
      +2
      Quote: kalibr
      Modern electric engravers

      I meant something else. Wrote it wrong.
  3. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
    Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 17 September 2023 10: 43
    +2
    Last century. Reprint from what year's book?
    Nowadays, children cannot even relate to such boring, static things. Do it crookedly (and it won’t work any other way) and then what? Admire? Boast?
    Also, the technology of manufacturing the case, distorted by the author, is the basis of the model. If anyone tries to start, which is already a rarity these days, then at this initial stage he will get the maximum disappointment and quit his job.
    1. kalibr
      17 September 2023 11: 57
      +2
      Quote: Ivan Ivanych Ivanov
      Nowadays, children cannot even relate to such boring, static things.

      You are wrong, Ivan, literally a few years ago I did this in a class with children. In Penza school No. 47. And everything went well. Just recently I worked in the Rostum center with the children of very wealthy parents, and again everything went well. By the way, there were even photos of me making knight’s helmets with them. And it went too. Although they don’t swim. Moreover, I liked it. And here the little boat is still floating. And so that it doesn’t go wrong, we need to properly organize work with children. It’s just that you are not a teacher by training and judge from the point of view of an adult.
      1. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 17 September 2023 19: 01
        +3
        It’s just that you are not a teacher by training and judge from the point of view of an adult.

        Engineer education. But I’ve been working with children in a technical circle since ’87 without a break, and before my eyes, the children’s perception of work in the circle has changed. In Soviet times, children worked for the sake of the process, but now they work only for the sake of the result and portfolio.
        Moreover, I lead free and paid groups - they do the same things. But the free ones have 3 people for 10 places, and the paid ones have 12 people for 10 places. Paradox? No, in the paid ones, children receive ready-made blanks from CNC machines, and in the free ones, the children THEMSELVES make the same parts 5 to 7 times slower.
        That is, quick results are important to children, even if it costs money.
        And in your classes, the children liked the originality, the technology. There are very few clubs now... Try it like I did. work with them professionally and CONSTANTLY, and not in master class mode, you will see something completely different.
        1. kalibr
          18 September 2023 05: 55
          +1
          Quote: Ivan Ivanych Ivanov
          That is, quick results are important to children, even if it costs money.
          And in your classes, the children liked the originality, the technology. There are very few clubs now... Try it like I did. work with them professionally and CONSTANTLY, and not in master class mode, you will see something completely different.

          You wrote me very interesting things. Thank you. Answers in order:
          1. I have been saying that FAST results are important to children since 1982. There was even an article in the magazine "Innovator-Inventor". All three of my technical books for children are aimed at this. creativity.
          2. Yes, I do not regularly work at school, periodically. And I adjust old technologies. But in principle, the children are still the same, although the difference between my childhood and today is huge. The main thing is the skill of the teacher.
          1. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
            Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 18 September 2023 10: 35
            0
            The main thing is the skill of the teacher.

            Undoubtedly. Children are forced to go to school. But children go to clubs specifically to the teacher. And in paid ones they also persuade parents to fork out money, which is not at all easy in our times.
    2. Fat
      Fat 17 September 2023 11: 57
      +3
      hi Greetings, Ivan.
      Quote: Ivan Ivanych Ivanov
      Nowadays, children cannot even relate to such boring, static things.

      For jam day, I bought my granddaughter a coloring book from the “Magic Garden” series, colored pencils, an eraser, a stick, and a set of gel pens. Both the youngest and eldest grandson rushed to paint the Mayan masks with squeaks and scandals... And very carefully, with feeling and proper arrangement!
      Yes, I was impressed myself... And the fact that the author showed “unsuitable methods”, then let the child figure it out himself, and if he comes up with something better, then that’s great!
      That's the whole point. We need to teach a child not to be afraid of mistakes.
      1. kalibr
        17 September 2023 12: 09
        +2
        Quote: Thick
        We need to teach a child not to be afraid of mistakes.

        Yes! I tested it on my daughter, then on my granddaughter. Now she is married. Everything has been confirmed. It’s up to the great-grandchildren, ha ha! I'll have something to do with them!
  4. Non-fighter
    Non-fighter 17 September 2023 11: 50
    +2
    Dear author! You wonderfully describe the process of making the model, but unfortunately you do not indicate the most important thing - how much time it took you.
    If you repeat what you do with your own hands, then you need to spend twice as much time as it takes you, because you have the skill, and the tools are at hand.
    And another small point. When to practice? That's right, on the weekend. That is, on Friday evening, start preparatory work; on Sunday evening, the model should be ready, at least without painting and small attached parts, this can be done later.
    1. kalibr
      17 September 2023 12: 07
      +2
      Quote: Not the fighter
      then you need to budget twice as much time as it takes you,

      Good question. I didn’t specifically write about time, because the expectation is for an adult to work individually with a child, and here the skills are different and the time is different for everyone. Here you are 100% right. From experience I can say that the technology was tested on 3rd grade children. And in two classes, that is, 2 lessons, they made these models. 80% for 3, 20% for 4 and 5, as it should be. It is clear that with my help. But at home you also need the help of your father/grandfather. I have a book "For those who love to make things." It should be in children's libraries. Look at it, it has all this and much more. There is a website: “26 best books by V. Shpakovsky.” There is this book and others on initial modeling too.
  5. Dekabrist
    Dekabrist 17 September 2023 12: 23
    +2
    Hanseatic Cogg at sea. Drawing by a contemporary artist

    The design of the anchor shown in the figure raises serious doubts. Anchors with such a rod date back to the second half of the XNUMXth century.
    Based on archaeological finds, the anchor could look like this.



    The anchor of King Henry VIII's flagship, the Mary Rose, which sank off Portsmouth in 1545.
    If you look at medieval images, then so.



    There is a rod here, but of a completely different design and size.
    1. Fat
      Fat 17 September 2023 14: 57
      +1
      hi Victor.
      In the general picture I still see a 4-arm anchor without a rod... Well, I have doubts, but to challenge... In general, the experienced know better.
      Maybe you could enlighten me for a moment so that I don’t accidentally knock anyone off...
      With respect.
      1. 3x3zsave
        3x3zsave 17 September 2023 15: 58
        +1
        A two-legged anchor with a rod hangs on board.
      2. Dekabrist
        Dekabrist 17 September 2023 16: 48
        +2
        In the general picture I still see a 4-claw anchor without a rod...

        The design of the four-legged auxiliary anchor (cat) does not raise any questions.
        I have doubts about the design of the deadlift anchor.
    2. 3x3zsave
      3x3zsave 17 September 2023 16: 49
      +2
      The miniature dates from 1405. No stock
      1. kalibr
        17 September 2023 17: 25
        +2
        Quote: 3x3zsave
        3x3zsave (Anton)

        Oh yes, Anton! I found this...My applause!
        1. 3x3zsave
          3x3zsave 17 September 2023 17: 28
          +1
          I backed away from your article, Vyacheslav Olegovich.
          1. kalibr
            18 September 2023 05: 57
            +1
            Quote: 3x3zsave
            I backed away from your article,

            So you need to remember where everything was - that’s what I mean!
      2. Dekabrist
        Dekabrist 17 September 2023 17: 32
        +3
        The miniature dates from 1405. No stock




        Queen Mary's Psalter - early XNUMXth century. An anchor with a rod is shown.
        There is one point in this matter - we can judge anchors from the beginning of the XNUMXth to the middle of the XNUMXth century only from drawings, since there are no archaeological finds of anchors from this period.
        Judging by the available images, anchors were used both with and without a rod. The latter are more common. Actually, what confused me was not the presence of the rod, but its design. What is in the picture is clearly not the Middle Ages.



        This is an anchor from Cook's ship Endeavor, which was lost in 1770 when the ship ran aground on a reef off the coast of Australia.
        1. 3x3zsave
          3x3zsave 17 September 2023 18: 18
          +2
          Queen Mary's Psalter
          Do I understand correctly that this is the proper name of the manuscript, and it most likely belonged to the “French She-Wolf”?
          1. Dekabrist
            Dekabrist 17 September 2023 18: 32
            +2
            Do I understand correctly that this is the proper name of the manuscript, and it most likely belonged to the “French She-Wolf”?

            Who owned the manuscript for two hundred years after writing, until in 1553 it fell into the hands of Queen Mary I of England, who is Bloody Mary, there is no reliable information. Isabella of France is considered as one of the possible options.
        2. Fat
          Fat 17 September 2023 18: 19
          +2
          Victor. From the explanation to the drawing of the ship: "The Hanseatic Cogg at sea. Drawing by a modern artist"
          Moreover, the merry sailing history of the Hansa ended by the middle of the 17th century... In any case, your version is reliable. I won't even go into details.
          Sincerely
      3. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 17 September 2023 19: 11
        +1
        The miniature dates from 1405. No stock

        There is a rod, it’s just an artist’s mistake. Anchors of this type, without swivel legs, without a rod, literally don’t work at all.
        1. Dekabrist
          Dekabrist 17 September 2023 19: 22
          +2
          Perhaps you are right, although in medieval miniatures “artist’s mistakes,” as you say, are quite common.

          1. 3x3zsave
            3x3zsave 17 September 2023 20: 33
            +1
            Regarding “artist mistakes,” any accuracy in the image can only be counted on starting with the works of the Limburg brothers and Jean Fouquet.
        2. 3x3zsave
          3x3zsave 17 September 2023 19: 35
          +1
          Anchors of this type, without swivel arms and without a rod, literally do not work at all.
          Please explain why?
          1. Dekabrist
            Dekabrist 17 September 2023 19: 56
            +2
            Why?

            It will not catch on the ground. It will lie flat. The effectiveness of such an anchor is low. It is necessary that one of the paws catches on the ground. This is why the stock was invented.



            As we can see from the diagram, after recoil, the anchor lies flat and the rod rests on the ground. When the slack in the anchor chain is removed and the part of the chain lying on the ground is tense, it will pull the anchor bracket downwards, the anchor will turn over on the rod, the rod will take a horizontal position, playing the role of a lever, and the paws will become vertical. In this case, the lower paw will enter the ground entirely.
            1. 3x3zsave
              3x3zsave 17 September 2023 20: 16
              +1
              And if we assume that the armature arms are not rotated 180°, but are at an angle to each other, will such a scheme without a rod work?
              1. Dekabrist
                Dekabrist 17 September 2023 20: 50
                +1
                They tried to remove the rod many times. But to no avail. To get rid of the rod, you need to make turning legs.
                1. 3x3zsave
                  3x3zsave 17 September 2023 21: 00
                  +1
                  you need to make turning paws.
                  Which is feasible for medieval technologies, but too labor-intensive. So, we take it on faith that the anchors of the Middle Ages were equipped with a rod, albeit more primitive than later...
                  1. Dekabrist
                    Dekabrist 17 September 2023 21: 06
                    +1
                    Which is feasible for medieval technologies, but too labor-intensive.

                    Even making a classic Admiralty anchor was an extremely difficult task for medieval blacksmiths.
                    1. 3x3zsave
                      3x3zsave 17 September 2023 21: 24
                      +1
                      They managed to make breech-loading guns...
                      1. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 17 September 2023 22: 02
                        +1
                        They managed to make breech-loading guns...

                        Making a cannon barrel using forge welding is much easier than making an anchor of the required strength with a spindle length of more than four meters and weighing more than a ton using the same method. These are the dimensions of a XNUMXth century anchor.
                      2. 3x3zsave
                        3x3zsave 17 September 2023 22: 13
                        +1
                        What is the required strength of the metal? In both cases? Maybe according to Rockwell, in this case I at least understand something
                      3. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 17 September 2023 22: 25
                        +1
                        Maybe according to Rockwell, in this case I at least understand something

                        Which Rockwell? For those materials, Brinell is too much. Nowadays any nail “shit steel” is of higher quality.
                      4. 3x3zsave
                        3x3zsave 17 September 2023 22: 35
                        +1
                        Maybe you should stop showing off, colleague? And explain what’s the matter, using “Dekabrist” as an example? Yes, I don’t know much about metalworking, yes, I’m a technician against my will, but is it possible to explain without trying?
                      5. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 17 September 2023 23: 01
                        0
                        Maybe you should stop showing off, colleague?

                        What show-offs? If a person writes Rockwell, does he seem to understand what it is for? And if he doesn’t understand, then why ask the question like that? You can ask
                        without surviving
                        ?
                      6. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 17 September 2023 22: 34
                        +1
                        According to Rockwell, this is not strength, it is hardness, that is, the ability of a material to resist the penetration of a harder body.
                        And strength is the ability of a material to resist destruction under the influence of external loads.
                        The necessary characteristics and sections can be calculated; there is strength material for this.
                        The mechanical properties of steel of that time can be found in the literature.
                        For example, a steel sample from 132th century armor has a yield strength of 0 MPa. Modern St 190 (this is the most useless structural steel with minimal carbon content) has a yield strength of XNUMX MPa.
                      7. 3x3zsave
                        3x3zsave 17 September 2023 22: 51
                        +1
                        I always said that I am a “reluctant technician.” To hell with it, I’ll have to sit down for “compromise materials” and “materials science”.
                      8. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 17 September 2023 23: 05
                        +2
                        To hell with it, I’ll have to sit down for “compromise materials” and “materials science”.

                        It’s a dubious pleasure, I’ll tell you. Once upon a time there was a saying among students of technical universities: “If you pass the proof of proof, you can get married.”
                        In my graduation project, among other things, there was a calculation of the crystallizer for the electron beam melting plant. There was no Internet in those early years. I had to dodge.
                      9. The comment was deleted.
                      10. 3x3zsave
                        3x3zsave 17 September 2023 23: 43
                        +1
                        Doubtful, not doubtful - one (or One) horseradish will have to.
                      11. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 17 September 2023 23: 57
                        +1
                        I can recommend it. Great tutorial. And to it, a collection of problems of approximately the same thickness for practical consolidation of the theory.

                      12. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 17 September 2023 23: 09
                        +2
                        For example, a steel sample from 132th century armor has a yield strength of XNUMX MPa.

                        It's not that simple. Still, the armor and the anchor were made for different purposes, and therefore the metal processing technologies were different. Nowadays, it’s also a sheet of armor steel and just a sheet of structural steel, although they look similar, they are made using different technologies.
                      13. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 17 September 2023 23: 38
                        +1
                        It's not that simple. Still, the armor and the anchor were made for different purposes, and therefore the metal processing technologies were different. Nowadays, it’s also a sheet of armor steel and just a sheet of structural steel, although they look similar, they are made using different technologies.

                        And how many medieval steel production technologies used in Europe can you cite?
                      14. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 18 September 2023 10: 31
                        0
                        And how many medieval steel production technologies used in Europe can you cite?

                        I talked about steel processing technology - unlike steel production, there were quite a lot of them in the Middle Ages. The armor has been studied quite well with microsections, metallography, hardness testing, etc. I have never come across such information about anchors.
                      15. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 18 September 2023 12: 29
                        0
                        I talked about steel processing technology - unlike steel production, there were quite a lot of them in the Middle Ages.

                        There weren't many of them. Forging, metalworking, thermal. That's all.
                        The armor has been studied quite well with microsections, metallography, hardness testing, etc. I have never come across such information about anchors.

                        https://hmsjournal.org/index.php/home/article/download/309/297
                      16. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 18 September 2023 12: 48
                        0
                        There weren't many of them. Forging, metalworking, thermal. That's all.

                        You are not right. The same armor can be made by diffing (drawing) and rising (upsetting) the metal. In case 1, the metal is thinned and cold-worked - i.e. becomes thinner and harder. In case 2, the metal becomes thicker at the edges without becoming harder. And since both methods are used in complex armor such as cuirass and helmet, the metal in them has different strength, hardness, etc. in different places of the armor. There were no muffle furnaces then and it was not possible to achieve the same heat treatment parameters for complex armor.
                      17. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 18 September 2023 13: 29
                        0
                        You are not right. The same armor can be made by diffing (drawing) and rising (upsetting) the metal.

                        In any case, it will be blacksmithing.
                      18. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 18 September 2023 13: 37
                        0
                        In any case, it will be blacksmithing.

                        Now this also applies to the locksmith. But in any case, these are different processing technologies, because blacksmithing is not a technology.
                      19. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 18 September 2023 12: 53
                        0
                        https://hmsjournal.org/index.php/home/article/download/309/297

                        This is just about armor, not about anchors.
                      20. Dekabrist
                        Dekabrist 18 September 2023 13: 28
                        +1
                        I'm sorry, I'm too lazy to put things in order in the archive.
                        https://www.academia.edu/71679073/Modern_or_medieval_Analysis_of_an_iron_anchor_from_Camuscross_Scotland_and_direct_dating_methods_for_metal_artefacts
                      21. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 18 September 2023 13: 40
                        0
                        https://www.academia.edu/71679073/Modern_or_medieval_Analysis_of_an_iron_anchor_from_Camuscross_Scotland_and_direct_dating_methods_for_metal_artefacts

                        Thanks for the link.
                      22. Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov
                        Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov 17 September 2023 22: 15
                        +2
                        Making a cannon barrel using forge welding is much easier than making an anchor of the required strength with a spindle length of more than four meters and weighing more than a ton using the same method. These are the dimensions of a XNUMXth century anchor.

                        Yes. For that time, just making metal for an anchor was already a considerable problem, but forging and welding was generally the high-tech of the Middle Ages.
  6. Fangaro
    Fangaro 17 September 2023 17: 31
    +2
    Vyacheslav Olegovich!
    Thank you!
    Maybe, and for sure, there are better descriptions and advice. But yours will be useful to me.
    It’s too early to start, due to age, but persistence and the desire to do something that you can be proud of, it’s also better not to put it off until 3-4 grades.
    Thanks again!
    1. kalibr
      18 September 2023 06: 03
      0
      Quote from Fangaro
      It's too early to start, due to age,

      Try it! My grandfather started tinkering with crafting tools when I was 5 years old...