“Burning with a blue flame”: the permanent representative of the Russian Federation called on the UK to tell the truth about the fate of the Challenger tanks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

33
“Burning with a blue flame”: the permanent representative of the Russian Federation called on the UK to tell the truth about the fate of the Challenger tanks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

The UK Ministry of Defense needs to publish new information on its website about the fate of tanks Challenger 2, which were previously supplied by London to the Kyiv regime. This was stated by the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN and the UN Security Council Vasily Nebenzya.

There is old information on the British Defense Department website that not a single Challenger tank was damaged in Ukraine. However, in reality at least two British-made tanks were destroyed. The Russian diplomat drew attention to this discrepancy.



The equipment supplied to the Kyiv regime is burning with a blue flame, including the vaunted American Bradley armored personnel carriers, German Leopard tanks, and British Challengers

- said the permanent representative of the Russian Federation to the UN at a meeting of the Security Council of the international organization.

Nebenzya emphasized that there are currently 12 more British tanks “rolling around somewhere” in Ukraine. But the same fate awaits them. In addition, the permanent representative of the Russian Federation predicted a similar fate for American-made Abrams tanks, which the United States promised to begin supplying to Ukraine in September of this year, and for F-16 aircraft, which Western countries promise to transfer to Kiev after training Ukrainian pilots.

Previously, many Western military experts noted that the military equipment transferred by NATO countries did not become a “miracle”weapons"for the Kyiv regime and did not greatly help it in carrying out the counter-offensive of the Ukrainian formations.
  • Wikipedia/CplRigg/MOD
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    12 September 2023
    Yes, any equipment burns, theirs or ours. They haven't come up with an invulnerable one yet.
    1. +8
      12 September 2023
      Quote: Normann
      They haven't come up with an invulnerable one yet.

      But how much ambition! What does the USA have, what does the EU countries have,
      1. +1
        12 September 2023
        Western governments now have another reason to explain to the citizens of England, the USA and Germany that their taxes must absolutely be spent on the purchase of Challenger 3, Abrams X and Panthers.
        1. +1
          12 September 2023
          “Burning with a blue flame”: the permanent representative of the Russian Federation called on the UK to tell the truth about the fate of the Challenger tanks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces
          But for the USA and the countries of the “Washington Regional Committee” the MAIN thing is not that their tanks and other equipment are burning on the battlefield!
          Willard Mitt Romney, an American politician, governor of Massachusetts (2003-2007), senator from Utah (since 2019), spoke about this frankly and cynically. Namely.

          There is such a thing.
          Mitt Romney, US Senator from Utah since 2019, was interviewed and made the following statement:
          - That “5% of the defense budget that the United States spends on Ukraine is an AMAZING investment of money!”
          - That the United States, through these means, is weakening Russia, China’s main ally, and China, in turn, begins to feel worse if Russia is doing poorly.
          - And the USA, at the expense of 5%, which is generally 5% of the US DEFENSE budget, is fighting VERY WELL with Russia - and AMERICAN soldiers DO NOT DIE there, in Ukraine. And UKRAINIAN soldiers do a good job of THIS FUNCTION, FIGHTING for the USA!

          See in detail - Here's the thing. Video dated August 28,08.2023, 41, duration 64 seconds. Zen. - https://dzen.ru/video/watch/2ea84f61fb01cc18f99fdbXNUMX

          TOTAL Ukrainian men and now women, and then their children They don’t understand that THEY FIGHT, ultimately, not for themselves, but for the well-being and hegemony of the US globalists and their pro-American satellites in the West - in Europe, too! That Ukrainians for them are just a CONSUMABLE MATERIAL to pull chestnuts out of the fire WITH ALIENS (Ukrainian) HANDS..
          This is where the “dog is buried”!
          1. +4
            12 September 2023
            Quote: Tatiana
            “Burning with a blue flame”: the permanent representative of the Russian Federation called on the UK to tell the truth about the fate of the Challenger tanks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces
            By the way, ethyl alcohol burns with a blue flame, but if it burns with an orange flame, then this is already a sign of methyl alcohol, and this is poison.
            1. 0
              12 September 2023
              Apparently you are a specialist in moonshine. :)
              Ttttttttttttt
              1. +1
                13 September 2023
                Quote: CastroRuiz
                Apparently you are a specialist in moonshine. :)
                There is little. But what is the difference between methyl alcohol and ethyl alcohol should be known to those who do not drink moonshine, but purchase liquids of dubious origin. These alcohols do not differ in taste.
            2. +2
              13 September 2023
              Burns with a blue flame, this is a figurative expression, indicating that it burns very well and with high quality bully
          2. +1
            13 September 2023
            Quote: Tatiana
            That Ukrainians are just CONSUMABLES for them

            Well, that’s what they said from the very beginning of the SVO.
            1. +2
              13 September 2023
              Quote: dedusik
              Quote: Tatiana
              That Ukrainians are just CONSUMABLES for them
              Well, that’s what they said from the very beginning of the SVO.

              Of course they did! However, the awareness of this truth has not yet reached the Maydanuto-saucepan-headed Ukrainians! They completely minus this truth even here on the VO website!
              They do not want to believe that 1) that the Jew Zelensky is a drug-addicted president, a dollar billionaire, a thief, a racist and a sadistic Nazi, and 2) that the US globalists and their satellites in the West have cynically deceived the Ukrainians and are simply biologically eliminating them, clearing them of them their Ukrainian and primordially Russian lands.

              See video - "Kompromat on Zelensky: 7 dirty secrets - Classified lists." Published May 27, 2023.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. -4
      12 September 2023
      Quote: Normann
      Yes, any equipment burns, theirs or ours. They haven't come up with an invulnerable one yet.

      Absolutely right. Any tank can be knocked out or blown up. The only question is how much this slows down the completion of the combat mission.
      1. +6
        12 September 2023
        Aaron Zaavi!
        Good health to you, but keep an eye on the letter. You express your opinion well in Russian, but there are so many typos.
        It’s as if it’s not you who is writing this, but someone else who will hire you.
        1. 0
          12 September 2023
          Quote from Fangaro
          As if you weren’t writing this, and someone will hire.

          Hackers from Ruin! request
        2. +2
          12 September 2023
          Quote from Fangaro
          Aaron Zaavi!
          Good health to you, but keep an eye on the letter. You express your opinion well in Russian, but there are so many typos.
          It’s as if it’s not you who is writing this, but someone else who will hire you.

          Phone request
    3. +1
      12 September 2023
      Quote: Normann
      Yes, any equipment burns, theirs or ours.
      recourse I don't agree. Theirs burns brighter, there is miraculous uranium. request
    4. 0
      13 September 2023
      Quote: Normann
      Yes, any equipment burns, theirs or ours. They haven't come up with an invulnerable one yet.

      More precisely. It hasn't been like that for about XNUMX years now. Everyone has. At least think about it.
  2. +3
    12 September 2023
    I hope Fergus Ecorsley was from England at the UN Security Council meeting
    .He was ranting here about something, he’s not a Russophobe, he doesn’t want Russia’s defeat, he wants Russia to have peace and prosperity on English terms. He studied Russian culture for 7 years. I’d like to see his face when Nenbenzya told him about the Challengers.
    1. -1
      13 September 2023
      Quote: tralflot1832
      I would like to see his face when Nenbenzya told him about the Challengers.

      Do you think he revealed the secret to him? or is it a “damn mistake and disgrace” of British diplomacy that the information on the website was not updated... there is no need to make an “elephant” out of this particular news laughing
  3. -3
    12 September 2023
    The equipment supplied to the Kyiv regime is burning with a blue flame, including the vaunted American Bradley armored personnel carriers, German Leopard tanks, and British Challengers

    Did he just say that? "Blue flame"?

    It would not hurt to send the author of the text for retraining in the Russian language.
    Such errors in the news on VO reduce the credibility of the News itself.
    Whether this was done intentionally or due to a misunderstanding, the editors themselves will figure it out.
  4. 0
    12 September 2023
    Lord, two tanks were knocked out, let alone talk
    1. +8
      12 September 2023
      Quote: Bone1
      Lord, two tanks were knocked out, let alone talk

      That is, 2 times more than during the entire previous military career of the Challengers
  5. +1
    12 September 2023
    Quote: Normann
    Yes, any equipment burns, theirs or ours. They haven't come up with an invulnerable one yet.

    Everything is logical: the tank has fuel (if it is not an electric tank), there is ammunition (except for firing cast iron cannonballs), which means it can burn and explode. Whether it's an English supertank or a German one - the final result is the same. laughing
  6. -4
    12 September 2023
    “Burning with a blue flame”: the permanent representative of the Russian Federation called on the UK to tell the truth about the fate of the Challenger tanks of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

    The equipment supplied to the Kyiv regime is burning with a blue flame, including the vaunted American Bradley armored personnel carriers, German Leopard tanks, and British Challengers

    The title is correct, but the quote remains as it was.
  7. +6
    12 September 2023
    Quote: Bone1
    Lord, two tanks were knocked out, let alone talk

    2 out of 14 is already almost fifteen percent. And this is already good.
  8. -1
    12 September 2023
    IMHO, all this is empty. And the hype, and 2 tanks.
    The first one, as they wrote, was covered from above with a large caliber. No tank can resist this.

    But in real life they have been writing for a year now - they knocked out Toto, they knocked out Shoto... At Krasheninikov’s, according to calculations, a lot has already been destroyed one and a half to two times...

    But in fact, the technology of writing about isolated casualties, about the “exploits of one corporal” (a quote from a Soviet book about the war) instead of effective mass successes/offensives has been known for a long time.
    So I would like not information noise - but specifics.
  9. 0
    13 September 2023
    Western military equipment, both tanks and trucks, are not suitable for repair in the field, they are very
    expensive to manufacture, capricious to maintain
    1. +1
      13 September 2023
      Chevrolet Camaro (Nikolai Lukashev), you did not provide enough photos to confirm your idea. After 6 identical photos, I still didn’t understand what you wanted to say about foreign tanks when demonstrating our tank. If you don’t know yet, I’ll tell you. Each forum participant has the opportunity to edit (correct) their comments within a few minutes after sending. And when you insert photos, you initially see a text link in your comment, and not the photo itself. Obviously, this is what confused you and caused you to repeat the same insertion six times. wink
  10. 0
    13 September 2023
    "Miracle weapons", these are fighters. The weapons simply must be up to par so as not to end up with a situation like in Africa, when no valor of African spearmen could withstand British machine guns. Both sides should have machine guns, and then the outcome of the war will be decided by a real miracle weapon - the valor and skill of the fighters and the work of industry in the rear.
    So far our weapons are in perfect order. The Ukrainians abandoned the Russian heritage, which means they also abandoned the Russian soldiers. We are a little better at this, so our fighters are better....
  11. -1
    13 September 2023
    Nebenzya, an interesting guy, works only on paper without looking up. Churkin is no match. I don’t want to repeat his nonsense.
  12. +1
    13 September 2023
    Are the submarine and landing ship not on fire?
    What a shame
  13. +1
    13 September 2023
    Well, the Brits can ask about how the 2 ships are at the shipyard in Crimea and whether the recipient liked the British missiles)) You need to be careful with show-offs, especially if your ass is half naked.
  14. -1
    13 September 2023
    if you put yourself in the place of the Britons and Hansev
    then they shrug their shoulders and see people who were afraid of their tanks
    and now those who feared have felt better and have gained courage from 2 destroyed tanks

    they give away their own complexes
  15. 0
    13 September 2023
    And about the fate of our two ships, hit in the dock by British missiles, he did not call

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"