Russia has developed a radio-electronic complex "Triton" to protect armored vehicles from FPV-drones

31
Russia has developed a radio-electronic complex "Triton" to protect armored vehicles from FPV-drones

Russia has developed a complex of electronic protection against FPV-drones, the system has already passed preliminary tests in the special operation zone and showed excellent results. Denis Oslomenko, General Director of the Industrial Espionage Countermeasures Laboratory, spoke about this.

The complex developed by the company, called "Triton", is a set of suppression modules and an antenna mounted on armored vehicles. The complex suppresses FPV drone control frequencies; in the basic version, it operates in four bands: 868, 915, 1200 and 2400 MHz. To date, "Triton" has already been tested in combat conditions, in the NVO zone, it has shown its effectiveness. In the future, the company plans to conduct joint tests with manufacturers of armored vehicles.



This is a proven solution, but one more test is coming in late August - early September on armored vehicles together with manufacturers. Design recommendations will be issued. The first tests in the NWO zone were successful, now it is necessary to obtain information from customers about what frequencies and design they need

- leads TASS words of the head of the company.


The modules of the complex are placed on armored vehicles, and their configuration can be changed, as well as adding new ones. It is powered by the on-board network of armored vehicles, a variant with battery operation is possible. Controlled from a remote control. It can also be used on pickup trucks and ATVs; in this version, the complex is installed in a plastic case.

"Triton" is a set of suppression modules and an antenna installed on armored vehicles, and the configuration of the complex can be quickly changed by adding modules to suppress new frequencies that the enemy begins to use to control FPV drones

- added to the company.
  • PPSh laboratory
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    August 28 2023
    "Laboratory for combating industrial espionage"

    It is important that this laboratory work like a PPSh Yes
    1. +10
      August 28 2023
      Yasnaya, these guys have been working since the 90s, and that's when I met them. Smart talented engineers, do quality things. Due to the nature of their non-public work, they did not shine much earlier, except in the circle of specialists. Now they are being written about. Their anti-drone guns are already working in the war. Mobile 4complex for equipment is now gone. Good luck guys!
      1. +2
        August 28 2023
        As you can see, there are four antennas and power amplifier modules in the kit - this is necessary to maximize the output power of the EM radiation. Power amplifier cooling radiators are visible.

        There are no broadband effective antennas and power amplifiers - output devices covering the frequency range.

        Therefore, there are 4 systems in the set. Antennas, emitters, amplifiers are optimized. This achieves the required specification parameters for range and directivity (in which sector of the upper hemisphere the device operates),

        The choice of the frequency at which the drone operates is limited by the requirement for EM compatibility with IWT radio systems - the frequencies of which are standardized - for example, the operation of NATO and Russian GPS systems, etc.

        Good luck in the field and new success to the developers.!!
  2. -3
    August 28 2023
    And when the drone visually determines the target itself, which they are now actively trying to teach, will it be suppressed? Like his camera?
    1. 0
      August 28 2023
      And when the drone visually determines the target itself, which they are now actively trying to teach, will it be suppressed? Like his camera?

      unless using plywood type decoys
    2. +3
      August 28 2023
      Quote: Smoked
      And when the drone visually determines the target itself, which they are now actively trying to teach, will it be suppressed? Like his camera?


      but about the simplest smoke screen, which is still actively used, you still have not heard anything?

      in general, against any kamikaze drones, KAZ will be very effective.
      1. -3
        August 28 2023
        I heard of course, but it seems that all such installations put the veil ahead of themselves. I have not yet seen the one who arranged a "hedgehog in the fog" above himself.
        Can a thermal imager see through smoke?
        1. 0
          August 28 2023
          no, there is a special aerosol in the mixture, because of which the thermal imager is not an assistant here
      2. 0
        August 28 2023
        In order to put a smoke screen, you must first understand what it is needed for, when a target is irradiated with a laser, it’s clear that the sensors work, but for a drone, what should I do, put visuals with AI?
    3. 0
      August 28 2023
      The complex suppresses control signals, but it doesn’t matter what and how the drone “determines the target” ....
    4. 0
      August 28 2023
      the sound, as well as the general control of the drone, is carried out via radio channels, which this device presses in a radius from the tank, if the radio channel is muffled, then there will be no kin, or do you think the picture appears on the operator’s monitor with the help of magic shol?
    5. 0
      August 29 2023
      The visual channel is easy to suppress with a Lazarus beam!
  3. 0
    August 28 2023
    Any system can be counteracted. It's nice to read that our bright minds are actively working and their ideas are being used.
  4. 0
    August 28 2023
    The principle of operation is interesting, i.e. it is not narrowly focused like that of drone strikers, but works on the entire celestial sphere, but then its power should decrease exponentially with distance. If so, then does it have a range of literally several tens of meters? Judging by the video, kamikaze drones are already flying by inertia at this distance.
  5. -2
    August 28 2023
    The complex suppresses the frequencies of controlling FPV drones, in the basic version it operates on four bands: 868, 915, 1200 and 2400 MHz.
    And whether it was necessary to specify the operating frequencies? And won’t the enemy correct)) (reprogram) the frequency of his drones? They must have already read this article.
    1. 0
      August 28 2023
      these are the same frequency standards as the frequencies of GSM, WiFi and other electronic equipment
  6. +2
    August 28 2023
    Such a complex is necessary and vital. Naturally, there are questions. If this complex is powered from a network of military equipment. How to disable this technique. Or does she have to work all the time? How does it affect its own systems, communication? Equipment then needs to be equipped with generators. Which would work during parking. In general, it is clear that it is necessary to revise the konpanovka itself and the equipment of our ground forces. Yes, this was expected.
  7. -2
    August 28 2023
    If this complex really works so well, then it must be installed on all our equipment.
    1. 0
      4 September 2023
      Those who gave me minuses probably think that FPV kamikaze drones fly only into tanks. Do you need to protect the rest of the equipment from these kamikaze drones? fool
  8. +2
    August 28 2023
    Yes, this electronic warfare will glow in the radio range like a Christmas tree on a quiet January night. Accordingly, we can expect the use of anti-radar missiles and drones with a similar guidance system. It will be enough to fly up to the zone of a reliable signal from this station and turn on the homing system. The drone will fly like a night moth to a bright lamp.
    1. +1
      August 28 2023
      As a variant of protection in a stationary position - the placement of the complex at a certain distance from the equipment.
      The cost of such a rocket might be many times more than such an emitter. In general, yes - the future belongs to inexpensive and massive ammunition flying into the "light" of EMP, of little power, but sufficient to damage radio equipment.
      1. 0
        August 28 2023
        It will be more expensive than a jammer to be destroyed, especially since the antenna is taken out from the main unit so that nothing like this will happen.
    2. 0
      August 28 2023
      well, show me how you screw a similar seeker to a drone, I'll take a look
    3. +1
      August 28 2023
      The anti-radar tank will not destroy, the maximum will cut with fragments
    4. 0
      August 28 2023
      if the jammer turns on only when it detects a control signal from a nearby drone, then the problem will not be so big
    5. 0
      August 29 2023
      For starters, such drones have not yet been created. When they begin to be mass-produced, then, perhaps, the NWO will end. And secondly, existing anti-radar missiles are quite expensive. And the cost of a drone equipped with this (and in fact it needs several detection and target designation systems for universality) system will not be so small compared to the price of the destroyed equipment. This means that no one will produce them in large quantities in the near future.
  9. 0
    August 28 2023
    We have solid talents working on Vasilyevsky Island))
  10. 0
    August 28 2023
    It is powered from the on-board network of armored vehicles


    So it looks like a low-power option?
    I hope that at least at a distance of 50 meters from the tank it will be able to suppress.

    a set of suppression modules and an antenna mounted on armored vehicles


    There is a serious problem with such an electronic warfare system (installed directly on the tank).
    When the system is turned on, the tank in the radio range will immediately "glow" like a bright spotlight, even disguised in planting under trees.

    Will there soon be special drones that aim directly at the radio emission of the tank's electronic warfare system? Maybe it was better to make it mobile, without installation on armored vehicles?
    1. 0
      August 28 2023

      Will there soon be special drones that aim directly at the radio emission of the tank's electronic warfare system? Maybe it was better to make it mobile, without installation on armored vehicles?

      such a drone is unlikely to take into account the terrain and will hit poles, trees and other obstacles, especially if the equipment is moving. At least until AI can be crammed into such drones to recognize all these obstacles and control the drone.
  11. 0
    August 28 2023
    The complex will come in handy ... now the Ukrainians are preparing to establish mass production of loitering ammunition "Perun" (copies of the "Lancet" ...) ... we need to prepare!
  12. 0
    August 29 2023
    If the coverage area of ​​this electronic warfare is less than 50 meters, then I don’t see the point in it. From a shorter distance, with a complete loss of the radio signal, the drone will fly by inertia +/- exactly at the target, taking into account the radius of destruction. You can sew instructions into the brains of the drone in case of a complete loss of external control. For example, keep the last course.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"