Military Review

The US Air Force retested the ARRW hypersonic missile after a failed launch in the spring

20
The US Air Force retested the ARRW hypersonic missile after a failed launch in the spring

On August 19, the US Air Force conducted a test of the ARRW (Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon) hypersonic missile. This is reported by the American edition of Defense News. According to the publication, the tests took place in southern California.


For testing, the US Air Force used the Boeing B-52H Stratofortress strategic bomber, which fired the AGM-183A hypersonic missile developed by Lockheed Martin as part of the ARRW program.

Interestingly, the US military department did not report whether this test was successful or not. But in the United States, a lot of work is now underway to create its own hypersonic weapons. Washington really wants to catch up with Russia and China, which have gone ahead in this matter.

In March 2023, tests of a prototype hypersonic missile were unsuccessful, since then American designers have made certain adjustments and re-tested the ARRW in August.

The superiority of Russia and even China in the field of hypersonic weapons over the United States greatly worries the US administration and the Pentagon. The United States considers this one of the main challenges, given the difficult military-political situation and the ongoing deterioration of Washington's relations with both countries.

However, the United States is experiencing certain problems in creating its own hypersonic weapons, as evidenced by unsuccessful missile tests and the fact that the issue of producing its own hypersonic weapons has not yet been resolved.
Photos used:
Wikipedia / US Air Force / Christopher Okula
20 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 22 August 2023 07: 52
    +2
    Interestingly, the US military department did not report whether this test was successful or not.
    Very strange. Or they were classified, although earlier infa according to the results was almost immediately, or they will announce later.
    1. Nexcom
      Nexcom 22 August 2023 07: 54
      +2
      IMHO, it would have been a successful test, they would have voiced it anyway, such that everything that the amers got worked out would be tensed. Since they are secret, it means that not everything is as smooth as it was intended. IMHO.
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 22 August 2023 08: 05
        +2

        Nexcom (Dmitry, Russia)
        Today, 07: 54
        NEW

        +1
        IMHO, it would have been a successful test, they would have voiced it anyway, such that everything that the amers got worked out would be tensed. Since they are secret, it means that not everything is as smooth as it was intended. IMHO.
        hi ! So yes, it would be better if they failed "as always".
        1. Nexcom
          Nexcom 22 August 2023 08: 06
          +1
          aszzz888 hi mutually.
          ____________________________
      2. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 22 August 2023 08: 46
        0
        hi!
        Quote: Nexcom
        IMHO, it would have been a successful test, they would have voiced it anyway, such that everything that the amers got worked out would be tensed.

        Actually. they also voiced unsuccessful ones, comforting themselves with the fact that they were "conditionally successful".
        I agree - if everything went more or less as planned, then the ringing would go all over the world: "We have eliminated the backlog and even surpassed the Russians by 100 miles!" And complete silence - in my opinion, it's something like "flopped right after leaving the pylon." They will figure out how - they will recoil.
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 22 August 2023 19: 39
          +1
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          They will figure out how - they will recoil.

          Undoubtedly.
          However, I am more reminded of Mr. Trump's pearl with his "super-duper hypersonic missile", which flies 17 times faster than any currently existing missile.
          At the same time, the Dagger and Vanguard have already flown with us. Even if we assume that at 10M, then it turns out 170 Machs ... This is \u59d 344, 2 km / s, which is higher than the 5,3nd space. speeds 3,6 times (going beyond the GSO of the Earth) and 3 times than the XNUMXrd space one - to go beyond the solar system!
          I believe that the "BayDown administration" will not be able to soak anything like that. laughing
          1. Yngvar
            Yngvar 23 August 2023 12: 26
            0
            "Super duper ..." yes!
            Working on hypersonics in SA is reminiscent of a joke about tonsils:
            "And we cut out the tonsils! .. 5 years have passed - Autogenous! .. another 5 years have passed - Through the ass! .."
    2. Mikhail Ivanov
      Mikhail Ivanov 24 August 2023 02: 02
      0
      While they are testing there, the Indians have launched a lunar rover! The times of mattresses are over, now the main thing for them is to figure out among themselves who is cooler - lame Grandfather Bidon or playboy Trump ...
  2. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 22 August 2023 08: 17
    -2
    They have another ten years to sit at the PC at night, and then refine it with a file ...
  3. rocket757
    rocket757 22 August 2023 08: 18
    0
    The US Air Force retested the ARRW hypersonic missile after a failed launch in the spring
    N-yes, s ... they have hyper missiles flying every two times, but they want to learn how to shoot them down ??? However, the dough in this case will be cut a lot.
    However, the printing press works, the paper rustles!
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 22 August 2023 08: 23
    +1
    the US military department did not report whether this test was successful or not.
    So there is no reason to blow the fanfare yet. If at one time they were forced to report an unsuccessful test, then the world would certainly have been informed of a successful one. Each successful test goes to the treasury of the American military-industrial complex. Moreover, they understand how they lag behind Russia and China in this type of weapon.
  5. Mariupol
    Mariupol 22 August 2023 09: 44
    -4
    It will be funny if they have a hypersonic missile that will be launched from the ground or a ship! And in the Russian Federation, another instant-31k is needed for the rocket!)) So it’s too early to rejoice about hypersound, in fact we don’t have it ...
    1. NotPetya
      NotPetya 22 August 2023 10: 09
      -3
      How dare you disbelieve in Russian military science? Does the rocket fly some part of the way in hypersound? It means hypersonic, and it doesn’t matter that a stripped-down supersonic high-altitude all-weather long-range interceptor fighter is needed to disperse it. From which they sawed everything they could, added fuel tanks and made it a carrier of the Kinzhal missile, which is an aviation version of the Iskander complex. It's really hard to be sarcastic here. Take an ordinary Iskander rocket, attach it to an aircraft, accelerate it to supersonic speed - shoot it and proudly call it supersonic.
    2. Vyacheslav Ermolaev
      Vyacheslav Ermolaev 22 August 2023 10: 11
      +3
      It's funny that everyone is caught by hypersound. Remember that hypersonic speed is considered to be more than 5 M. Intercepting a missile flying at hypersonic speed along a ballistic trajectory is not a problem from the word "completely". The first such interception was carried out in the USSR in March 1961. Problems arise with missile defense systems if the missile flies at hypersonic speed along a pseudo-ballistic trajectory. And the missile manufacturer must come up with something that, on the one hand, will allow the missile to "wag" along the line of the ballistic trajectory, and on the other hand, not to lose speed due to this or not burn down. So what about hypersonic - we have a bunch of hypersonic missiles. But "wobble" or, to put it correctly, "flying along a pseudo (quasi) ballistic trajectory" was implemented on the Iskander-M (9M723 missile). They simply changed the carrier, called it "Dagger", and due to this, the flight range was increased from 500 km to 2000 km. The speed of the 9M723 rocket is 7M. So the missile hits hypersonic even without the help of the MiG-31.
    3. Vyacheslav I.
      Vyacheslav I. 22 August 2023 12: 38
      0
      Forgot about Zircon. From the ship. You probably forgot or did not want to tell about it. So there are already ships equipped with it. And you continue to believe in your TV.
    4. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 22 August 2023 20: 02
      +3
      Quote: Mariupol
      It will be funny if they have a hypersonic missile that will be launched from the ground or a ship!

      1. If you didn’t notice, they have 183A suspended under the B-52H plane.
      2. From the SM-6 ship, they have 6-7M at the target in terms of ballistics.
      3. The Chinese launch their GZ anti-ship missiles with the help of an IRBM, called DF-21D, and so far they only carry DF-17 in parades ... So far, they are modestly silent about combat use from a carrier.
      4. We have a GZ glider 15Yu71, as the combat equipment of the ICBM, which maneuvers in height and course on the way to the target. There is an aeroballistic X47M2 launched from an aircraft carrier.
      Finally, there is 3M22, which has naval carriers: APRK pr.885M and frigate pr. 22350 / 22350M ...
      Well, now you can laugh: the Yankees have nothing yet! laughing
  6. TermNachTer
    TermNachTer 22 August 2023 09: 47
    0
    Some kind of large gap between launches, or something was being finalized, or made anew. Somehow it is not clear.
    1. Vyacheslav Ermolaev
      Vyacheslav Ermolaev 22 August 2023 10: 44
      0
      Very understandable. They are trying to achieve hypersonic flight and at the same time fly not along a ballistic, but a quasi-ballistic trajectory. The problem is that when trying to perform a maneuver, the rocket can either slow down more strongly, or simply burn out if the flow regime is violated. Oddly enough, thanks to not quite literate journalists, the main thing for a hypersonic missile is not hypersound (there are no problems with it), but a system that provides hypersonic maneuvering. There are a lot of options here: solid-fuel engines, gas-dynamic rudders, systems for blowing gas into the flow zone. The problem is that they must operate during the entire time of passage of the missile defense zone
      and at the same time, do not slow down the rocket and do not disturb the flow regime so that it does not burn out.
  7. KosR
    KosR 22 August 2023 10: 36
    0
    Yeah, they have problems)))) Envy as usual, this time that in Ukraine they have already washed 140 yards without their department, they will drag out the process until the end of the war for the sake of dough)
  8. EXPrompt
    EXPrompt 24 August 2023 08: 32
    0
    What is this being done ... Previously, the fact that the Americans as a nation are stupid did not bother the Pentagon .. and then the epiphany came .... it probably came ..