Military Review

Putin has an ideology. This is the ideology of sovereignty

54
Is the glass half empty or the glass half full? When it comes to a public statement by a political leader, it is absolutely natural to expect that he will adhere to the last interpretation. While that does not contradict reality. The question is different: why is this glass half empty, what is this empty half and what kind of emptiness is it filled with? Actually, this is the brilliant article by Timofei Sergeytsev in our main topic (p. 8). We are talking about state power and ideology, that where there is ideology, only there is state power. And where there is none, the space of utopia acts - the empty half of a glass. That is the space of the hidden power opposing the state. Our political system, as Sergeytsev accurately determined, is a compromise between the state - the institution of presidential power - and oligarchic rule.

Hence, from this semi-emptyness, all the symptoms noted by our authors. This is the insecurity of sustainable reproduction of power. And from here all these, still under-treated games with “tandem”. This is the continuing conspiratorial nature of all Russian politics and concrete political decisions, when actions that are quite logical within the framework of the state ideology are hidden behind politically correct screens. For example, a complete ban on the activities of political NGOs acting on American grants is a logical response to the preamble of the “Magnitsky Act”, which, in fact, declares the intention of the United States to finance the overthrow of the current government in Russia. However, this ideologically absolutely flawless answer is forced to hide behind morally vulnerable fuss around the ban on American adoption.

Our post-catastrophic elite, the “semi-oligarchy,” certainly also has its own ideology. As it should be, concealed by utopia - “universal representative democracy”. This totalitarian ideology can be called comprador oligarchic liberalism (political correct name: liberal fundamentalism). And this ideology, personified by the financial authorities and personally by the “constructive oppositionist Kudrin”, fully defines the economic policy and economic structure of modern Russia.

Putin has an ideology, of course (or proideideology, since there is no "half-full" ideology). This is the ideology of sovereignty. And accordingly, whether he wants to or not, the ideology of the Empire, the imperial identity. Since there is no other real sovereignty other than imperial in the modern world. But the ideology of sovereignty is rigidly buried in the space of economic policy, which is strategically absolutely comprador and rigidly opposed to any attempts at independent development. “This is not your piece of glass! And there is nothing to go there! ”That is why Putin has not and cannot have, while maintaining the current power compromise, no independent economic ideology, and accordingly, no developmental ideology and leadership ideology.

The second half of the way is that such an ideology must emerge and be realized in action. Otherwise, the first half will be meaningless and ineffectual. In the last Message, there is already a soft touch over the second half of the glass, one might say, a hint. The responsibility of the financial authorities, and the Central Bank in the first place, for economic development and jobs. This is an allusion to the state program of mass construction of rental housing ... In fact, the road to hell is paved with "hints". The invasion of the ideology of sovereignty in the field of economic policy beyond the borders of the current power compromise means, in essence, a revolution. And without it, without breaking this compromise, no development is possible. Yes, and the reproduction of power and the country itself is impossible. And all the demands and hopes for salutary changes in economic policy are futile and pointless.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.odnako.org/
54 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. understudy
    understudy 24 December 2012 11: 31
    0
    Yeah ... "however." Who will be the first to peck if they say that the rubric "political humor" has not yet been included in the "Military Review"?

    What I agree with is "... a complete ban on the activities of political NGOs acting on US grants is a logical response to the preamble of the Magnitsky Act, which essentially states the intention of the United States to finance the overthrow of the current government in Russia. However, this ideologically absolutely flawless answer is forced to hide behind morally vulnerable fuss over the ban on American adoption..."
    As for impeccability, this is a controversial issue, but, unlike the "dumbest deputy", it is quite clear to me, as an ordinary citizen, that the topics of adoptable children and NGOs should be divided into two bills.
    1. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB 24 December 2012 11: 41
      +20
      Russia cannot have any other than "imperial" ideology ...
      1. Vadivak
        Vadivak 24 December 2012 11: 48
        +9
        ShturmKGB
        Russia cannot have any other than "imperial" ideology ...


        So Leontyev is ruined about this, only what kind of imperial ideology is it when it is economically unprofitable for the Empire to maintain foreign military bases? However, there is enough money for other events
        1. Botanologist
          Botanologist 24 December 2012 14: 47
          +18
          What is imperial ideology when it is economically unprofitable for an empire to maintain foreign military bases?

          You do not confuse island empires with continental empires. Small Britain, the USA are island. Russia is continental. Therefore, for us, bases abroad are not an inseparable attribute of an empire, but for the USA they are.
          However, this is only a matter of evolutionary development. Now we would bring everything to our minds within our borders. And here Leontyev is right - it is necessary to decide decisively with the liberals, because the theory of the liberal economy is killing the country. Yes, and ideology does not interfere more clearly, half-hints are no longer interesting to anyone. It's time to explain directly to people.
          1. old rocket man
            old rocket man 24 December 2012 17: 09
            +10
            Botanologist,
            So I want about the same thing. Dear (quite sincerely) Botanik. Smart people have not been seduced by official terminology for a long time and we all perfectly understand what is really happening. But, started by Leontyev, the conversation has long been expected and is, to some extent, a landmark, kind of signal to society (everyone knows that the Leontief is a kind of mouthpiece of the Kremlin) changes are coming (so far in the political field) but, inevitably entailing changes in the economic field, for economics and politics are interconnected like love and bed, one thing without the other, it’s simply not viable (in, bent over, almost according to Marx) So, if Leontyev had already talked about this. -we will see, I would like to wait drinks
            1. 24 December 2012 22: 27
              +3
              Quote: Old Rocketman
              But, started by Leontyev, the conversation has long been expected and is, to some extent, a landmark, kind of signal to society (everyone knows that Leontyev is a kind of mouthpiece of the Kremlin) changes are coming (so far in the political field) but, inevitably entailing changes in economic field, because economics and politics are interconnected like love and bed, one without the other is simply not viable (in, bent, almost according to Marx) So, if Leontiev talked about it. -we will see, I would like to wait

              Well, not only Leontyev speaks about this. Deputy Evgeny Fedorov has long and in detail disclosed the same topic in his interviews. And in this sense, the president’s message was really significant. The liberation movement is gaining momentum more and more, which is not surprising: the metropolis is weakening and the colonies have a great chance to regain full sovereignty.
        2. Nick
          Nick 24 December 2012 17: 25
          +2
          Quote: Vadivak
          What is imperial ideology when it is economically unprofitable for an empire to maintain foreign military bases?

          Empire, the concept is primarily political, economic preferences The Empire, first of all, receives from its geopolitical status.
          Quote: Vadivak
          However, there is enough money for other events

          This is yes, I agree. smile
      2. megatherion
        megatherion 24 December 2012 11: 59
        -5
        That's just all empires have one thing in common - they all inevitably collapsed. Now, apparently, the turn of the latter comes.
        1. old rocket man
          old rocket man 24 December 2012 17: 13
          +6
          Dynasties are necessarily collapsing. Empires are not necessary at all (an example is China and, to some extent, Japan) and Russia, in spite of the enemies, has staggered, but still it has not collapsed!
        2. Nick
          Nick 24 December 2012 18: 08
          +3
          Quote: megatherion
          That's just all empires have one thing in common - they all inevitably collapsed.

          Everything ever happens ... The Assyrian empire lasted 1500 years, Russia as an empire has existed since the time of Peter the Great, about three hundred years, we still have ahead ...
          1. megatherion
            megatherion 24 December 2012 21: 16
            +5
            Let's hope. By the latter, of course, he meant amers.
        3. Smsergei
          Smsergei 24 December 2012 18: 33
          +1
          And a united Europe is not, in your opinion, an attempt to create another empire, huh?
      3. Kaa
        Kaa 24 December 2012 12: 40
        +10
        ShturmKGB
        Russia, except as an "imperial" ideology, cannot have any

        You would explain this to the West, otherwise, along the way, "the comrade does not understand"
        “Speaking about the results of the last Russia-EU summit, Alexander Rahr, the research director of the German-Russian Forum, pointed out that Russia“ traditionally sees itself as a European country, but another - Byzantine, not Roman. ”Hence comes the“ problem of inconsistency in common values. ” which is a very strong irritant in relations between Germany, the West and Russia. Rahr believes: “The West must understand that the real, or genuine, Russia, if we speak in a historical context, is the one we see today, and not Russia 90 -s. "But here the problem is, in his opinion, not only the value and civilizational differences between the two worlds, but also the fact that" in the West, most observers and politicians believe that Russia, in fact, did not rise from its knees, that she is still in the dust, as she was.
        http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1607787.html#ixzz2FxKnskZJ
        Given the double debt crisis in Europe and the United States, Moscow no longer views the West as a model. Former Russian foreign minister Igor Ivanov, who is by no means anti-European in his views, says he is concerned that many in his inner circle now see "Europe as an industrial museum losing the war of innovation." Izvestia, a newspaper suspected of sympathizing with the Kremlin, claims it is the "twilight of Europe." Putin himself asked his diplomats to develop a plan for a turn towards Asia http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1607624.html#ixzz2FxMQttlX
        The US crusade against the ghost of the USSR, upon closer examination, did not begin so unexpectedly, continues Jurnal de Chisinau. He was preceded by the new policy of Berlin, which for some time was no longer disposed to forgive Putin the anti-democratic drifts, the energy blackmail of Europe and the persecution of the former Soviet republics.
        The war declared by the USA on the restoration of the USSR completely changes the paradigm of relations between the West and the East, writes Jurnal de Chisinau. The so-called integration projects in the CIS space initiated by Putin are, in fact, declared the embodiment of annexationism and revanchism. Or, if you like, the personification of evil, which the United States must confront. It's time to separate the grain from the chaff. Now no one can say that you can strive to both Eurasia and the EU without betraying yourself headlong as a servant of the Russians. Not only in the East, but also in the West, there are enough votes of Putin's minions who are trying to justify the expansion of the Kremlin in the post-Soviet space.
        http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1607789.html#ixzz2FxNDL3du
        What !!!! negative
        1. Botanologist
          Botanologist 24 December 2012 14: 54
          +6
          Not only in the East, but also in the West, there are enough votes of Putin's minions who are trying to justify the expansion of the Kremlin in the post-Soviet space.

          If they want to eat, let them serve. The time has passed when we paid them only for the fact that they came to Russia to teach us how to live "how to live" and poke our noses.
          Let them get used to living in the new economic realities, so to speak.
  2. alexng
    alexng 24 December 2012 11: 34
    +13
    Yes, only then will Russia gain sovereignty when the Central Bank of Russia nationalizes. And before that, sticks will be inserted into the wheels in huge quantities. And, IN GENERAL, is it not time to go to the track on the tracks, and then these stick-sticks in the rollers will never mind. The rollers will simply grind everything. There would be enough political strength in the fight against conscious and unconscious liberalists and all sorts of henchmen ..
    1. InkGrey
      InkGrey 24 December 2012 11: 52
      +2
      Speaking of "running on tracks", you conjure up associations of some extremes. the policy should be progressive and not too harsh. Correct me if not.
      1. Botanologist
        Botanologist 24 December 2012 14: 58
        +3
        That InkGrey minus? Logically argues - nefig in politics twitch. We jumped already. You need to stupidly and smoothly go to the goal. And then everyone admires China with its development and everyone forgets that Chinese politics is a policy of very soft and smooth changes. And it’s not a sin for us to stop shy.
        1. alexng
          alexng 24 December 2012 15: 37
          0
          I didn’t minus it and in general I don’t put any minuses to anyone. hi
          All removed the minus. Thanks for the comments!
          1. InkGrey
            InkGrey 24 December 2012 16: 00
            +2
            Yes, we are so - thinking on the topic, good evening! drinks
        2. baltika-18
          baltika-18 24 December 2012 15: 37
          +1
          Quote: Botanologist
          You need to stupidly and smoothly go to the goal.

          They go to a certain goal, but for some reason the goal is not visible to the people. But you correctly noticed that they are stupid.
        3. InkGrey
          InkGrey 24 December 2012 15: 39
          +2
          Cons here are commonplace. Wave a saber baldly shouting "about ... or polymers!" and "yes, bombard these generals / presidents / Americans with warheads (underline as appropriate)" is more popular.
          But for that matter in politics, for the most part, people are very prudent and cautious. However, it is difficult to justify excessive caution.
          1. Wertynskiy
            Wertynskiy 24 December 2012 16: 14
            +2
            Quote: InkGrey
            Wave a saber baldly shouting "about ... or polymers!" and "yes, bombard these generals / presidents / Americans with warheads (underline as appropriate)" is more popular.

            Yes, this is precisely what our government is doing very often and willingly, always and everywhere, especially on television. And then you can’t see specific cases at all! Where is the stab fund? Whose Central Bank of the Russian Federation? Where is gold foreign exchange reserves?
            Quote: InkGrey
            But in politics, for the most part, people are very prudent and cautious.

            Do not you think that under the guise of forethought and caution, there is simply a blunt cut of a bean?
            And about the article:
            Putin has an ideology. This is the ideology of sovereignty

            ideology without concrete deeds, only a shaking of the air.
            1. InkGrey
              InkGrey 24 December 2012 16: 47
              +2
              Drank will always be on a large scale - here we have no illusions. It will be with any government and with any management style. And in any country, by the way. The question is how much orders can these large scales be cut off.
              I agree about ideology without work, but let me remind you where we were 15 years ago. I understand that I want to see the best (superlative) life as quickly as possible, but it doesn’t. And there are mistakes as well. Of course I do not want to see the mistakes of state leaders, however.
  3. afire
    afire 24 December 2012 11: 38
    +2
    the article is written in such a style that such a super-veiled mainstream demolishes completely .... minus
    1. InkGrey
      InkGrey 24 December 2012 11: 47
      +1
      You know, often such veiledness allows you to more fully understand the essence, since in simple words and simple phrases "head on" (which many of course understand better and like) it turns out to be said too inaccurately and clumsily. So, to say, the mood is not conveyed if you just talk.
      1. afire
        afire 24 December 2012 12: 50
        0
        and here we are not uplifting ....
        The title of the article has nothing to do with mood.
        This is a very serious topic!
        1. InkGrey
          InkGrey 24 December 2012 15: 40
          +2
          You did not understand me. I mean that complicated turns were invented to express complex thoughts.
  4. Z.A.M.
    Z.A.M. 24 December 2012 12: 15
    +1
    "That is why Putin does not and cannot have, while maintaining the existing power compromise, no independent economic ideology, and, accordingly, no ideology of development and ideology of leadership."
    I would add - and NO national ideology ...

    What is the "ideology of sovereignty"? What sovereignty? Or WHAT?
    Sovereignty is the independence of the state in making internal and external decisions. He, "S", is multifaceted.
    Economic, we already, at the suggestion of Putin, have missed the WTO.
    Financial - the status of the CBR and, again, the withdrawal of money in crazy amounts, etc.
    Political. Well, if we only, after some "Magnitsky list", can worry about the fate of Russian children as a "symmetrical answer", then ...
    Military - "NEBaza" in Ulyanovsk, and the entire long-standing flight over our territory of NATO aircraft.
    Cultural - watch TV and other media.
    Humanitarian - on the next branch we are discussing (CONDEMN) educational reform. By the way - BASIS TOTAL.
    National - “... So, in mid-December,“ liberal intellectuals ”and“ champions of stability ”gathered a certain“ Gaidar Forum ”, where they discussed“ strategic issues of state building. ”In general, by the very name one can safely judge what kind of audience there is. In general, this forum is very noteworthy, since it was there that both “loyal Putinites” and “supporters of the swamp,” as it were, peacefully “worked out a strategy”, which proves once again that there is no difference between them. (and actually on the fourth) that the swamp kikimors (striving, as it turned out, to extend the powers of the gnome-nanist Medvedev) are one and the same Russophobic riffraff and share their maximum issues of tactics. On the questions of which they seem to have no disagreements.

    And what kind of strategy is this?
    "Putin wants to create a Eurasian super-ethnos"

    The idea of ​​"gathering a new Eurasian super-ethnos" should become a new national idea for the Russian Federation. This was announced on December 19 at the Gaidar Forum "Russia and the World: 2012-2020" during a round table on migration issues, said Tatyana Valovaya, director of the government's international cooperation department. The event was attended by the correspondent of "National Accent".

    "Why can't we find a Russian national idea? I don't see it, but I see a Eurasian national idea. This idea is to bring together a Eurasian super-ethnos," Valovaya said.
    ... Nevertheless, Valovaya believes that "in the issue of integration in the Eurasian space, the main thing is not the economy." "The main thing is the gathering of the Eurasian super-ethnos," said the director of the government department.

    Recall that in an article in the Izvestia newspaper dated October 3, 2011, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin unveiled the idea of ​​creating the Eurasian Union as "one of the poles of the modern world."
    This is part of an article from 5 APRIL (!!!) 2012, site - Rusichi ROOIVS © inform

    It is possible to further disassemble the "sovereignty" ... Only whether it remained ... not ostentatious and not "URYA!" ...
    1. Trofimov174
      Trofimov174 24 December 2012 19: 08
      +3
      "Economic, we have already, at the suggestion of Putin, pissed away, the WTO"
      Oh my God, it's scary then to imagine your reaction to the Customs Union! What will you write then? "The great act of self-identification, the dawn of one's own independence!", No less. Indeed, what scared you with these three letters? Have all 158 member countries of this organization lost their economic sovereignty long ago? This is really a world conspiracy.
      "Financial - the status of the Central Bank of Russia and again, the withdrawal of money in huge amounts, etc."
      Excellent status, allowing you to take a directional course without narrowing your horizons with the political situation in the country. As for the withdrawal of money: Sberbank acquired the Austrian Volksbanken AG, what is it? Withdrawal of capital! After having Denizbank, what is it? Also the withdrawal of capital! Gas flow construction? Withdrawal of capital! Those same expansion into foreign markets, this is also the withdrawal of capital, is at the same time nothing more than a sign of independence, otherwise all these strings would have been cut long ago (most likely they would not have been allowed to get hold of). As for the problems with foster children, they were worried about this for a long time, otherwise these topics would simply not have surfaced in the media or elsewhere, because on the continent of democracy and concentration camps, all the bad news about our children was hidden without the attention of our authorities , these events would never have gone beyond regional news. As for the bases ... First, about the flights: do not ours fly? Whose plane fell in the Czech Republic, Mongolian? Ah, these vile Mongols, it was not for nothing that they built walls from them. And (under) the base of our North Atlantic friends, would it be if there were no offense to Palestine? Just think about it, the life of today's soldier of hydrocarbons in Afghanistan is completely dependent on the mood of Moscow, Uncle Nixon turned over from such a coffin. Is the base in Ulyanovsk harmful to our security (under)? No, but how else, because in order for a cartridge to fire not only a rifle is needed, but also a soldier, preferably a North Atlantic, and there is a problem with North Atlantic soldiers in Ulyanovsk - they are not.
  5. baltika-18
    baltika-18 24 December 2012 12: 48
    +5
    I've been reading articles and always thinking how good it is to be a columnist, political scientist, expert. What am I for? Yes, about the ideology of sovereignty, what kind of thing is this. Ideology is the basis of the state, it’s goals and objectives, why does it exist state. Sovereignty is the independence of the state in all areas without exception. Without sovereignty of the state does not exist, without sovereignty is a colonial formation, if sovereignty is limited, it is a semi-colony. Russia is a state without a clear, clearly formulated ideology, with limited sovereignty, that is, we have semi-colonial education. Achieving sovereignty cannot be an ideology, Achieving sovereignty is the path to proclaiming your own ideology, and for this you must first formulate an ideology and strive for it through achieving full sovereignty.
    1. Ascetic
      Ascetic 24 December 2012 22: 00
      +5
      Quote: baltika-18
      I've been reading articles and always thinking how good it is to be a columnist, political scientist, expert. What am I for? Yes, about the ideology of sovereignty, what kind of thing is this. Ideology is the basis of the state, it’s goals and objectives, why does it exist the state


      as they say, sovereignty or whether it exists or does not exist, and everything else depends on the length of the leash on which the so-called sovereign countries hold it. And the ideology of sovereignty is the struggle to get rid of this leash or stranglehold — financial, economic, political, ideological, legal, etc. d. In some areas, Putin has reached sovereignty and in some areas not yet. Let's say things like dollarization or the primacy of international law, for example. Somewhere the glass is half full as in the economy, there are still oligarchs - compradors. but there are state monopolies that are really prone to corruption and theft in a comprador liberal economy. Therefore, the promise of the Kremlin, we see the guys and gradually working, cut the pieces in pieces. Here is such a leontief message ..
  6. homosum20
    homosum20 24 December 2012 13: 32
    +3
    The article absolutely accurately describes our situation and the problem facing GDP. Whether he can solve it or not, our future depends on it. Thanks to the author for a sober look and courage to state it, brevity and accuracy.
  7. Sasha 19871987
    Sasha 19871987 24 December 2012 13: 32
    +4
    the person by the character of Stalin’s grandfather is not enough, we need an iron hand, because we are used to doing everything from under a stick, and then we will have a great country ...
    1. Botanologist
      Botanologist 24 December 2012 15: 06
      +6
      man by the character of grandfather Stalin is not enough

      Firstly, Stalin also did not start to knit from the threshold of the rope, and more than 10 years strengthened the political situation.
      Secondly, Stalin could afford collectivization and the surplus-appraisal. And today, only old women can collectivize from the village, the rest are either in business or have long left. Either drunk, but you can’t arrange industrial growth with them.
      Thirdly, our economy today is very sensitive to world events. Let's start bending off topic - we’ll stay with our bare ass very quickly. And I would not want to become North Korea. I do not want to be participants in the competition for the best mourning of the dear leader of the great teacher Kim Jong Il or anyone there, already confused.
      1. InkGrey
        InkGrey 24 December 2012 15: 44
        +1

        Let's start bending off topic - we’ll stay with our bare ass very quickly.

        Exactly. Not those times. it is impossible now to just take everything into a fist and start building a "great future". A great revolt is more likely to build a civil war. And if it is softer - the leakage of frames of different levels abroad.
        1. aksakal
          aksakal 24 December 2012 23: 35
          0
          Quote: InkGrey
          Exactly. Not those times. it is impossible now to just take everything into a fist and start building a "great future". A great revolt is more likely to build a civil war. And if it is softer - the leakage of frames of different levels abroad.
          - do you hint at voting by feet? I agree, an unpleasant thing. With all due respect to Stalin and his generalists - his methods did not channel in the 21st century in any way. There will be a massive vote by feet, and that’s all we will achieve. Plus international isolation - grab those jokes from us.
  8. military
    military 24 December 2012 13: 36
    +5
    "... In the last Address there is already a soft hit on the second half of the glass, one might say - a hint. On the responsibility of the financial authorities, and the Central Bank, first of all, for economic development and jobs ... The invasion of the ideology of sovereignty on the field of economic policy abroad the current power compromise means, in essence, a revolution. And without it, without breaking this compromise, no development is possible ... "
    So that's where the dog rummaged"... belay the leader, it turns out, is a deeply conspiratorial "revolutionary" ... no more, no less ... feel
  9. Normal
    Normal 24 December 2012 13: 47
    +2
    Putin has an ideology.
    Well. thank God! We survived .... At 13 where the government of the GDP appeared ideology.
    - And what is it?
    - How is it in what? In sovereignty, naturally ....
    - What does Putin's sovereignty mean?
    “How do you not understand?” Putin's sovereignty is the independence of the president from the population. Independence of the president from the law. Independence of the president from the state of affairs in the country. Provided that the president is of course Putin. And how could it have crossed your mind that someone other than Putin could be the president? Medvedev? And who is it? Ah, the second part of the tandem ... Well, it will not be needed soon. About eleven years later ...
    So. There is one single person who fights for the independence of the country and national happiness. The truth is forced to do this secretly and secretly, since the rest of the population, led by the comprador oligarchy, is in every way interfering with it. Therefore, no one knows where the country leads. This is so that the enemies on the planned path did not make an ambush.
  10. taseka
    taseka 24 December 2012 13: 52
    +3
    She will split the oligarchs who appeared in 2, imprison thieves who laid down laws, fire bribe takers and bureaucratic thieves who steal from the people and make the ideology of patriotism - we will live in sovereignty!
    1. military
      military 24 December 2012 14: 04
      +6
      Quote: taseka
      Will sheaf the oligarchs who appeared in 2 years, imprison thieves who laid down laws, fire bribes and bureaucratic thieves who steal from the people and make the ideology of patriotism

      correctly... laughing tomorrow will start ... or the day after tomorrow ... or after-after ... yes
      1. taseka
        taseka 24 December 2012 20: 41
        0
        We'll see - military - we'll see! He sees us watching!
        1. military
          military 24 December 2012 21: 24
          -1
          Quote: taseka
          He sees us watching!

          I agree ... the "all-seeing eye of Sauron" does not sleep ... tremble, hobbits! ... wink
          1. aksakal
            aksakal 24 December 2012 23: 38
            +1
            Quote: military
            I agree ... the "all-seeing eye of Sauron" does not sleep ... tremble, hobbits!
            - you can't guess, Military. "Bandar-logs, come to me!" - it's closer. He himself admitted that he loves Kipling since childhood.
            1. military
              military 25 December 2012 09: 22
              0
              Quote: aksakal
              He admitted that he loves Kipling since childhood.

              it is noticeable, Aksakal ... drinks all our homegrown "Brothers Grimm" grew up on Kipling's tales ... winked
  11. Igor
    Igor 24 December 2012 15: 40
    +5
    Sovereignty should not be ideology, sovereignty should be an integral part of the state, like a person’s arms and legs.
  12. vezunchik
    vezunchik 24 December 2012 16: 41
    +3
    In 2013, our beloved government presented us with a great gift! Now those with IP will pay 36 thousand rubles to the Pension Fund. And if you take into account how many small entrepreneurs working on the market have small incomes, they simply go bankrupt and have already begun to close. Today I was in the tax office - the corridor of people closing the IP is full. And to the place of the expected increase in contributions to the PF there will be .... Yes, open unemployment will increase ...
    Here’s your grandmother and St. George’s Day!
    1. military
      military 24 December 2012 21: 58
      +1
      Quote: vezunchik
      ... the government gave us a great gift! ... in place of the expected increase in contributions to the PF will be ....

      "nerds" rule ... request as always give odds to any "cook" ... recourse
  13. ziqzaq
    ziqzaq 24 December 2012 16: 47
    0
    +10000 !! That's for sure!!!!
  14. understudy
    understudy 24 December 2012 18: 03
    +1
    Quote: Botanologist
    USA is an island... Therefore, for us, bases abroad are not an inseparable attribute of an empire, but for the USA they are. However, this is only a matter of evolutionary development. Now we would bring everything to our minds within our borders. And here Leontyev is right - it is necessary to decide decisively with the liberals, for the theory of liberal economics is killing a country.


    Oyoyoyo, what a delight! USA - Island ... laughing This knowledge can only be obtained at the Fursenkov school or directly in the state ??? smile
    Not theory kills a country, but concrete people. Moreover, their party affiliation is known to all. feel
  15. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr 24 December 2012 18: 05
    +1
    We all began to reasonably argue whether Putin has an ideology or not. But is there really? And what is ideology? What is its essence? We are used to looking into dictionaries:
    The meaning of the word Ideology according to Ephraim:
    Ideology - A system of ideas, perceptions, views that characterizes the views on the socio-political and other life of a social group, class, political party, society.

    Meaning of the word Ideology according to Ozhegov:
    Ideology - A system of views, ideas that characterize a social group, class, political party, society

    Ideology in the Encyclopedic Dictionary:
    Ideology - (from idea and ... logic) is a system of political, legal, moral, religious, aesthetic and philosophical views and ideas, in which people's attitudes to reality are realized and evaluated. The term "Ideology" is often used to denote the false, illusory consciousness divorced from reality.

    The credo of each ideology:
    - conservative - upholding and protecting the interests of the family, property and traditions;
    - Democratic - upholding and defending the interests of the majority formed at the elections;
    - liberal - upholding and protecting the interests of minorities;
    - socialist - upholding and protecting the interests of the working classes.

    So what is our ideology? Where are they leading us and what are they aiming at? And is there a real, unifying all ideology in our country?

    Probably not! The result of all actions over the past 20 years has been the collapse of people's trust in human thought as such.

    So what is ideology? For tubs, these are hoops. For an individual - his mentality, spirituality, ideology as components of his general and particular, relating to these types of cultural activities.

    Who are we? So far, unfortunately, have not decided !!!!!!!
    Therefore, the biblical Moses led his people through the wilderness 40 years before heading to the Promised Land: during this time, those born of slaves passed away and the generations of those born free who grew up were generations of people who could create a free strong state.
  16. understudy
    understudy 24 December 2012 18: 37
    +2
    Quote: AleksUkr
    Moses and drove his people through the desert for 40 years


    Duc, this ... ours for another 40 years will not pull. request
    1. military
      military 24 December 2012 21: 39
      0
      Quote: Understudy
      Duc, this ... ours for another 40 years will not pull.

      our "Moses", for some reason, is steadily associated with the Cretan labyrinth ... recourse
  17. igor12
    igor12 24 December 2012 19: 20
    +1
    Here the United States says that Russia shows its "Imperial manners" but I do not understand why the empire is bad, apparently in the English-speaking world the word empire is a synonym for the word "bad" but what is bad? Here the British Empire is not bad. Well, the Russian one is worse.
    1. Misantrop
      Misantrop 24 December 2012 19: 38
      +5
      Quote: igor12
      Here the United States says that Russia shows its "Imperial manners" but I do not understand why the empire is bad

      Empire, in their understanding, means that strategic resources will not be given away "for this", they will not even be exchanged for beads with mirrors. Again, when the emperors receive an order from the White House, they do not answer: "Yes, it will be done!", But approximately with the following phrase: "Wouldn't you go so clever on ... (target designation follows)" laughing Not only that, the empire usually has something to support this verbal construction in case of need ... Which "director of the planet" would like this? wink
  18. WW3
    WW3 24 December 2012 21: 07
    0
    Putin has an ideology, of course (or proto-ideology, since there is no “half-full" ideology). This is the ideology of sovereignty. And accordingly, whether he wants it or not, the ideology of the Empire, imperial identity. Since there can be no other real sovereignty other than imperial in the modern world. But the ideology of sovereignty is tightly stuck in the space of economic policy, strategically absolutely comprador and rigidly opposed to any attempts of independent development. “This is not your part of the glass! And there’s nothing to go in there! ”

    Usually I like Leontiev's articles, but here he is too clever in this article ... I agree about the imperial principle - this is a priori, but sovereignty in the state. context - independence ... further in the text - we rest on the economic aspect?
    It is necessary to build a customs union on the basis of this and the imperial vector will develop despite the sovereignty ....
  19. FATEMOGAN
    FATEMOGAN 25 December 2012 00: 07
    0
    there is such a great book by Nikolai Starikov - Nationalization of the ruble. The path to the freedom of Russia. There is also an audio option - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylgUKeR4TEM&feature=endscreen. for those who want to really understand where we are moving, what is really happening around the world, and how, little by little, we are rightly following the ideology of liberating the country - which Putin has been implementing for a long time.
    article +
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 25 December 2012 00: 42
      +2
      Quote: FATEMOGAN
      but we are truly following the ideology of liberating the country — which Putin has long been implementing.

      so he pretended that the country was indecently dependent on other people's technologies, finished high-tech products, sits firmly on the trade in raw materials, capital scatters offshore, thieves are sitting in multi-room apartments instead of prison. The old people and Leontyevs write everything correctly, appeal to Putin, only he does everything exactly the opposite.
      1. FATEMOGAN
        FATEMOGAN 25 December 2012 15: 13
        0
        I’ll see that the names of Starikov and Leontev are well known to you and it’s already pleasing, maybe you can even find time to read and listen to them, because obviously you didn’t do this from your comments and the hillside clichés slept in, just because the same Starikov was detailed and repeatedly I looked at and explained many of Russia's problems, and not at all the way you are trying to present them.
        1. Karabin
          Karabin 25 December 2012 20: 37
          0
          Quote: FATEMOGAN
          the names of Starikov and Leontev are well known to you

          It’s not surprising to you, yes. Moreover, I am familiar with many of the works of the above authors. Moreover, on ideological issues I agree with them. I also carefully read and listen to Mr. Putin, which I advise you. The commonality between the three gentlemen is patriotic rhetoric, and with Putin, it is not so bright. Further, the paths of the authors diverge even in the spoken-written, and even more so in the done. Supported by Starikov and Leontiev, the myth that neoliberal Putin is an inveterate imperial statesman leaves them in the court patriots. Otherwise, these authors would write on blogs, rather than flickering on TV screens.
          1. FATEMOGAN
            FATEMOGAN 26 December 2012 01: 11
            0
            however, you are a harsh person, since with one click of the mouse you forbade the patriotic statesmen to appear on television and drove them to their apartments for computers - to write in blogs, why should they sit there like naughty mice? just please do not tell me about the lack of "free" media, from your words only bloggers-patriots, Navalny, Chirikova or Medvedev, who loves tweeter, so what? and I don’t understand about Starikov, at the beginning you call him a patriot, but as soon as he talks about Putin not the way you want, you call him a “backyard patriot”, and translated into Russian - pocketing Putin's dog ... and you yourself, sorry, whose will you be?
  20. bart74
    bart74 25 December 2012 00: 46
    0
    Russia cannot have any ideology other than imperial. We are an empire of light in the total darkness of money-grubbing, usury and humiliation of human dignity. Let there be light!
  21. Karabin
    Karabin 25 December 2012 00: 53
    +1
    Putin has an ideology.

    There is. Fit Russia into globalization.

    This is the ideology of sovereignty

    The power of those who seized is from the people.
    1. military
      military 25 December 2012 09: 26
      0
      Quote: Karabin
      To President Mr. Putin V.V. Chairman of the Government Mr. Medvedev D.A., Chairman of the State Duma Naryshkin S.E.V “Faction of the All-Russian Political Party“ United Russia ”Gryzlov B.V. To the "Faction" Liberal Democratic Party of Russia "to V. Zhirinovsky" To the "Faction" JUST RUSSIA "Mironova S. M." To the "Faction of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation" G. Zyuganov »To the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation

      it's too late to drink Borjomi, if the liver has "fallen off" ... request
  22. vezunchik
    vezunchik 25 December 2012 03: 42
    +5
    To President Mr. Putin V.V.
    To the Chairman of the Government Mr. Medvedev D.A.
    To the Chairman of the State Duma Naryshkin S.E.
    In the "Faction of the All-Russian Political Party" UNITED RUSSIA "Gryzlova B.V.
    In the "Faction" Liberal Democratic Party of Russia "to V. Zhirinovsky"
    In the "JUST RUSSIA Faction" S. Mironova "
    In the "Faction of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation" G. Zyuganov "
    To the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation

    More than 2-fold increase in contributions to the PF for individual entrepreneurs in 2013 was imputed.
    In accordance with Federal Law No. 212-FZ (Federal Law of 03.12.2012 No. 243-FZ "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation on Mandatory Pension Insurance"), payments to the Pension Fund for self-employed individual entrepreneurs who do not have hired workers more than 2013 times.
    In 2012, the total amount of insurance premiums is 17 rubles.
    In Law No. 212-FZ (as amended on 03.12.2012 No. 243-FZ "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation on Mandatory Pension Insurance"), the total amount of insurance contributions for individual entrepreneurs to the Pension Fund and FFOMS in 2013 will amount to 35664 rub.
    This amount is unbearable for self-employed individual entrepreneurs who do not have employees, the adoption of this law will lead to the mass closure of individual entrepreneurs.
    At the same time, the state will lose the outlined tendencies for small business growth, which will push the country sharply back in economic development, lead to higher unemployment, worsening the situation (already difficult!) Of the bulk of the population, and increased popular discontent. This law will have the opposite effect expected. The budget will not receive even the money that it has now. Just because there will be no one to pay! Of course, except for entrepreneurs with chain supermarkets, and other large enterprises, (and this law did not affect them). the payers of these double contributions are just small entrepreneurs who, according to us, trade in the markets both in the heat and cold and in the rain or in small shops where the businessman trades alone, he is himself an accountant and seller and director or individual entrepreneur another labor activity is still he alone without hired workers, which means he is not so rich in small towns, and earning himself and his family a piece of bread, these fixed payments will hit hardest, because with an annual income of 70 - 80 thousand rubles, we are the most unprotected among other private entrepreneurs, since almost all earned will need to be given to the state and landlords.

    There is a lot of talk in the media about helping small businesses; that was also said in your speeches.
    And in fact, Russian business is purposefully destroyed from year to year. We barely survive, we balance on the verge between poverty and poverty. We are not even talking about business development, we barely have enough for our own food, and payments are steadily increasing in all directions - communal electricity, gas, water, property taxes, land taxes, gasoline, and transport taxes.
    But at the same time, we do not ask the state for anything and honestly pay taxes.
    You force us to close - we will close and go to the employment center for benefits. This is an anti-people’s law, discrediting you as a guarantor of improving the well-being of Russian people and it will have irreversible consequences.
    We do not ask us to help, just do not bother!
    1. military
      military 25 December 2012 09: 28
      +1
      Quote: vezunchik
      To President Mr. Putin V.V.
      To the Chairman of the Government Mr. Medvedev D.A.
      ...
      ...

      it's too late to drink Borjomi, if the liver has "fallen off" ... what
      They chose stability themselves ...
      1. vezunchik
        vezunchik 25 December 2012 10: 32
        +1
        Not when I didn’t vote for these ... but we have a magician who can do anything.
        1. military
          military 26 December 2012 10: 55
          +1
          Quote: vezunchik
          Not when I didn’t vote for these ... but we have a magician who can do anything.

          I did not vote either ... drinks but, as they say, "and h ... is it good?" ... request "favorite of the gods" did his job ... recourse
  23. Magadan
    Magadan 25 December 2012 04: 40
    +4
    Quote: alexneg
    AND GENERALLY SPEAKING, Is it time to go to the track on the track, and then these stick-in sticks will be in the skating rinks. The rollers will simply grind everything. There would be enough political strength in the fight against conscious and unconscious liberalists and all sorts of henchmen ..

    Powerfully said! One hundred pluses! It really would be our answer to any backstage western bigwigs and Russian mongrels sold to them.
    But this requires a powerful ideology. Like when liberals talk to us about "universal values", for example, homosexuals can arrange their own parades, and we calmly answer them that we live according to our own sovereign traditions, and homosexuals will eat with holey spoons in the zones.
    1. Z.A.M.
      Z.A.M. 25 December 2012 08: 43
      +1
      Quote: Magadan
      and we calmly answer them that we live according to our own sovereign traditions, and homosexuals will eat full of holes in the zones.

      good The most important thing is QUIET. And it is possible and in general - to "score" on their whine.
      1. FATEMOGAN
        FATEMOGAN 25 December 2012 15: 26
        +1
        the most interesting thing is that the stronger Russia becomes, the more they whine with anguish and despair, the enemy feels it - its mortal hour is near !!! bully
  24. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr 25 December 2012 17: 06
    +1
    Once again we are being pushed somewhere. All kinds of "Narodnaya Volya" members were recruited into the public chamber. They are trying to justify their place. By the way, they have been waiting for the promised for three years. Although I’m lying. The GDP has made a lot of promises in 12 years. And we will probably not wait for their fulfillment in our lifetime.

    Russian civilization is built on the ideas of protection and service. The oath of allegiance was given by our soldiers in any social system. Cadets, cadets, pioneers, doctors (the oath of Hippocrates), soldiers of the imperial army, Red Army soldiers - at the time of their civil formation, took the oath of allegiance to the motherland, idea, profession. An oath is a commitment to irrevocable obligations, and a promise can be waived if circumstances change. Russian people, under oath, went to death on the battlefield, went into plague barracks, fighting for the lives of the sick.

    The oath did the affidavit above the cost of the life of the one who swore. This is the basis of the foundations of our Russian civilization. People from the Public Chamber who came out with such an initiative are not ours. They are strangers. They do not understand that service and sacrifice are a fundamental part of our mental code.

    WE SHOULD UNDERSTAND - The oath of allegiance to the country and people is more important than the Public Chamber!

    Russia, as you know, has two allies: the Army and the Navy.
    And any digging under the Army is a digging under Russia.
    There will be no army - there will be no Russia.
    This idea, which is being planted by believers who do not swear to anyone, is another step towards the destruction of Russia ...