Military Review

The impact rate of production of the Mi-26

44
16 December 2012 of the year in Rostov-on-Don made the first flight of a new heavy transport helicopter Mi-26 (serial number 34001212635, serial number 32-05) completed by the construction of Rostvertol OJSC for the Ministry of Defense of Russia. December 21 This helicopter made a flight after receiving a complete new standard dark-gray coloring of the Russian Air Force and the tail number "04 yellow". This helicopter became the seventh built on the Rostvertol for the Russian Air Force in 2012 and the eleventh built under the 2010 contract of the year with the Ministry of Defense for the supply of X-NUMX Mi-18 helicopters (the first four vehicles of this Rostvertol contract were produced for the military department in 26 year).


The impact rate of production of the Mi-26

Mi-26 transport helicopter (34001212635 serial number, 32-05 serial number, 04 yellow serial number), built for the Russian Air Force at Rostvertol. Rostov-on-Don, 21.12.2012



In May-June, the Rostvertol plant under this contract handed over to the Russian Air Force two Mi-2012 helicopters (the last 26-series vehicles) - helicopters with the 31-31 serial number (the 09 blue side number, 88 serial number) and with serial number 34001212629-31 (tail number "10 blue", serial number 87).

Then the company built five helicopters of the new 2012 series for the Russian Air Force in 32. Of the 32-series helicopters built on Rostvertol, the 32-01 serial number (07 blue tail number, 34001212631 serial number) made the first flight of 6 September 2012, the 32-02 serial number (tail number 08 blue, 34001212632 serial number) - November 6, 32-03 serial number machine (34001212633 serial number, 10 blue side number) - November 29, and 32-04 serial number (34001212634 serial number, side the number "03 yellow") - December 4.

Helicopters with tail numbers "07 blue" (32-01) and "08 blue" (32-02) have already been handed over to the Russian Air Force and arrived on December 13th at the 573rd Army Air Base aviation to Khabarovsk. It is expected that by the end of the year the remaining three 32-series vehicles will also be delivered, including the last helicopters with tail numbers "03 yellow" (32-04) and "04 yellow" (32-05) will be delivered to the 48th Army airbases in Kamensk-Uralsky (Uprun, Sverdlovsk region).

Thus, in 2012, Rostvertol, having built seven new Mi-26s, set a record for the production of helicopters of this type from 1994 of the year (when ten Mi-26s were commissioned).

According to the information available, a total of X-NUMX helicopters of the Mi-2012, Mi-52H and Mi-26 types will be built for all customers at Rostvertol in 28.


The Mi-26 transport helicopter (34001212633 serial number, 32-03 serial number, 10 blue crew number), built for the Russian Air Force at Rostvertol. Rostov-on-Don, 04.12.2012



Mi-26 transport helicopter (34001212634 serial number, 32-04 serial number, 03 yellow serial number), built for the Russian Air Force at Rostvertol. Rostov-on-Don, 17.12.2012
Originator:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 23 December 2012 12: 13
    18
    Shock pace is good. If only this shock quality and, as a result, reliability were not affected ...
    1. studentmati
      studentmati 23 December 2012 12: 35
      13
      The pace is perhaps not so percussion already. And the quality suffers not from "shock", but from the low culture of production, both in the manufacture of components and in the final assembly. And the culture of production must be brought up constantly.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 23 December 2012 13: 11
        +3
        For this type of helicopter - this can be said, small-scale production.
        1. 77bor1973
          77bor1973 23 December 2012 13: 32
          16
          here for this type of helicopters the pace is really shocking, since the beginning of the 80s, only about 300 have been built.
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 23 December 2012 14: 05
            +2
            Well, why did they slap me a minus? What, you are not satisfied with the term "small-scale production"?
            1. 77bor1973
              77bor1973 23 December 2012 18: 53
              +1
              I do not put cons, with respect.
              1. Wedmak
                Wedmak 23 December 2012 19: 47
                +1
                In this case, I apologize. hi
            2. Mitek
              Mitek 23 December 2012 21: 21
              +4
              I set the minus, or rather, the child who sneaked to the computer)). Compensated by a plus in the profile). In general, you do not care for these pros and cons?) The main thing is that everyone is healthy)))).
              1. Wedmak
                Wedmak 23 December 2012 21: 47
                +1
                In general, do not care, but it seemed to me that my comment about small-scale production was not correctly interpreted.
            3. crazyrom
              crazyrom 23 December 2012 21: 44
              +3
              52 helicopter - 52 weeks in a year - that is, 1 helicopter per week! And these are not double dragonflies, but huge cars! (Mi-26, Mi-28Н and Mi-35) Here is the production!
      2. TekhnarMAF
        TekhnarMAF 23 December 2012 13: 14
        +1
        studentmati Are there facts? Culture, and production, and communication, and ...- is brought up constantly.
      3. Igor
        Igor 24 December 2012 08: 28
        0
        Quote: studentmati
        And the quality suffers not from "shock", but from the low culture of production, both in the manufacture of components and in the final assembly. And the culture of production must be brought up constantly.


        Some pretend that they pay a good salary, while others pretend that they work well. laughing
    2. Volozhanin
      Volozhanin 23 December 2012 17: 09
      +1
      yes, yes, I saw this when they drove the plan to the detriment of quality, it turned out well, very x ....... in.
  2. Lapaev mihail
    Lapaev mihail 23 December 2012 12: 13
    0
    the name of the organization is smiling; "Rostvertol")) and so good, but still not enough, the country is big ...
  3. Narkom
    Narkom 23 December 2012 12: 22
    +8
    Clear sky, "cow" smile
  4. jagdpanzer
    jagdpanzer 23 December 2012 12: 31
    +2
    I admire this bird!)))
  5. Mikelanjelo
    Mikelanjelo 23 December 2012 12: 34
    +3
    What a cow, this is a whale
    1. GSH-18
      GSH-18 23 December 2012 14: 58
      0
      This is DRAGON guys! Admires the power of this car in flight.
  6. AK-47
    AK-47 23 December 2012 12: 47
    +3
    the company built five helicopters for the Russian Air Force in 2012

    The most lifting Mi-26 helicopter in the world is unparalleled in technical and economic terms. The Mi-26 helicopter set 14 world records.
    Helicopters of this type are actively used to perform a variety of tasks - transport, evacuation, fire, etc. Mi-26T is capable of transporting up to 20 tons of cargo inside the fuselage or on the external sling.
    The only thing that confuses the development date of the Mi-26 is the beginning of the 70 of the last century.
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 23 December 2012 13: 13
      +7
      The only thing that confuses the development date of the Mi-26 is the beginning of the 70 of the last century.

      And do not be embarrassed. Mi-26 of the beginning of 70's and modern Mi-26 machines are almost different. Of the similar - only appearance.
      1. stranik72
        stranik72 23 December 2012 13: 51
        +3
        The filling, the D-136 engine is the same, the main gearbox is the same, the transmission is the same, the blades are the same. etc. I will say even more "terrible" facts, most of the main units on the military "new MI-26" are of the 2nd category. I will not upset you about the resources and service life, I will say that part of the 26 purchased that year is worth the depletion of the resource of some units. Undoubtedly, it is good that they were installed, but let's not deceive each other with the same 26 as 25 years ago, for a slight change in onboard equipment, mainly radio-electronic, which is not worth the price that the Ministry of Defense paid for the helicopters. If you bought a modernized version (which, by the way, does not exist), then there were no questions. And so why buy old cars. Better spend this money on deep modernization, and then take it.
        1. Wedmak
          Wedmak 23 December 2012 14: 11
          +3
          Where did you get this information? Where is it written that the old version is being purchased?
        2. toguns
          toguns 23 December 2012 14: 40
          0
          Quote: stranik72
          The filling, the D-136 engine is the same, the main gearbox is the same, the transmission is the same, the blades are the same. etc. I will say even more "terrible" facts, most of the main units on the military "new MI-26" are of the 2nd category. I will not upset you about the resources and service life, I will say that part of the 26 purchased that year is worth the depletion of the resource of some units. Undoubtedly, it is good that they were installed, but let's not deceive each other with the same 26 as 25 years ago, for a slight change in onboard equipment, mainly radio-electronic, which is not worth the price that the Ministry of Defense paid for the helicopters. If you bought a modernized version (which, by the way, does not exist), then there were no questions. And so why buy old cars. Better spend this money on deep modernization, and then take it.

          do you understand something in helicopter engineering and know the m-26 materiel ???
          do you work at the mi-26 assembly plant ???
          and most importantly, where are the proofs (proofs) of your words ???
          throw links share with the public :)
          I will venture to suggest that there will be no answers to all the questions :)
          1. stranik72
            stranik72 23 December 2012 19: 34
            +2
            In fact, I do not communicate with the "monkeys from Klava", but only out of a special attitude towards your avatar I will say:
            on issue 1 YES;
            on question 2 NO, but in the subject;
            I’m too lazy to prove something on the 3rd question, for D-136 is a Ukrainian engine, it was discontinued 20 years ago, until today their production has not been restored, and production of BP-26 (main gearbox) in Perm has not been restored, but there they’re even trying to do it. For other details, yes there is small-scale production, the basis and technologies are the same as 30 years ago.
            At the risk of assuming that you are "urya patriot" and honestly it upsets me.
            I really want the public i.e. the Russian people learned to think, if we do not learn, our government will gobble up Russia with us.
            1. toguns
              toguns 23 December 2012 23: 41
              +1
              Well, let's start the esteemed stranik72 :)
              Quote: stranik72
              on question 2 NO, but in the subject;

              how to say, you can be either in the subject or not in the subject, there is no third state, although a different state is characteristic of your campaign: "a little pregnant or a sturgeon of the second freshness."
              dig further ....
              I quote your words, you never in your life collected Mi-26 and do not know their kitchen from the inside, but at the same time claim that you know how it works.
              The question is why be monkey from Claudia ???
              Quote: stranik72
              on the 3rd question, you are too lazy to prove something

              Well Destky snot you expert or hto ???
              Quote: stranik72
              So, for the aiming, the D-136 is a Ukrainian engine, it was discontinued 20 years ago, until today their production has not been restored, production in BP-26 (the main gearbox) has not been restored in Perm, but at least they try to do it. For other details, yes there is small-scale production, the basis and technologies are the same as 30 years ago.
              I would venture to suggest that you are a "urya patriot" and honestly it upsets me.

              I repeat to you, Mi-2 and An-2, 41 and 65 years old, have been operating junk and flies asking why ??? it’s old and much better :)
              so 20 years is not a special indicator :)
              question if nothing is restored and collapsed where did 7 mi-26 come from ???
              Yes, I’m wondering who gave them to us or they gathered themselves ??? :)
              Quote: stranik72
              At the risk of assuming that you are "urya patriot" and honestly it upsets me.

              if only a little and this is not my worst trait, but I do not lie and do not try to be an expert without any reason for this :)
              Quote: stranik72
              I really want the public i.e. the Russian people learned to think, if we do not learn, our government will gobble up Russia with us.

              for the Russian people do not worry somehow let us break through :)
              ps
              so with the engines from mi-26 those that you put at least a serial and a series then you will sound them :)
            2. saturn.mmm
              saturn.mmm 25 December 2012 00: 39
              +1
              Quote: stranik72
              Actually, I don't communicate with "monkeys from Klava"

              Something you somehow immediately about the fauna.

              MOTOR SICH JSC CREATED A NEW MI-26 ENGINE
              10 September 2012
              RIA


              The Mi-26 multipurpose transport helicopter with new engines will have the best characteristics, as required by Russian and foreign customers, Vyacheslav Boguslaev, General Director of Motor Sich JSC, told reporters on Friday.

              “We have already made a new engine for the Mi-26 helicopter. It has already been tested and by the end of the year we must transfer it to the plant in Rostov,” Boguslaev said at the Gidroaviasalon-2012 exhibition.

              According to him, the Mi-26 will be a different helicopter with different characteristics. “What is important, not only domestic but also foreign customers demand this from us,” he said.

              Somewhere like that
        3. smel
          smel 23 December 2012 15: 18
          +8
          more "scary" facts
          Finally said the person who owns the material on the subject under discussion.A PLUS.It should be added that the current production at this enterprise is a penny on the scale of the USSR. That it has everything - from furniture production and warehouses to a vast territory, built up with exhibition and shopping centers. That all customers are Venezuela and Co., and not only MO and MES. That the veterans work. That the salaries of the workers are cheap. Yes, and much more, I just do not want to bore readers, but anger URA-patriots
        4. Mitek
          Mitek 23 December 2012 22: 23
          +3
          And you are right. But think about it, we DO NOT do engine helicopters yet ... But transport helicopters are needed in the Army. And you need to prepare personnel. And to maintain and modernize production. Previously, a huge country with an economy subordinated to military production worked on these machines. Then the country fell apart, or rather a bunch of traitors fell apart. And after that, the best factories were deliberately destroyed, technological chains were torn. Entire factories producing components turned out to be abroad and hastily transferred to the production of pans and night pots (for American money, by the way). To support and revive what remains of us is not an easy task. But what we see shows, in spite of everything that has ruined our aircraft industry, shipbuilding and everything else, feasible. There will be completely new cars. They will be sure.
    2. Captain Vrungel
      Captain Vrungel 23 December 2012 13: 13
      +2
      For the first time, these helicopters took part in hostilities in Afghanistan as part of 23 OAP Border Guards. Great transport car.
  7. toguns
    toguns 23 December 2012 13: 13
    +4
    recourse
    what we have as a result of mi-26
    contract 18 made 4 + 7 = 11 in 2013 I think they will hand over the contract
    I think we need another batch, or even two, total 36
    out of 52-7 = 45
    45 mi-28 and mi-35
    last year mi-28 delivered 14 helicopters for our air forces
    Well, let's say that this is a little more or the same
    45-15 30 =
    we know that mi-35s are mainly imported, but I don’t believe that 30 of them are made.
    I believe that the application that 52 Mi-26, Mi-35, Mi-28n helicopters were built is not correct and forgot to add the Ka-52.
    approximate table taking into account ka-52 on the release of the following
    mi-28 -15
    ka-52 - 15
    mi-35 -15
    mi-26 -7
    if I'm wrong, then correct :)
    with respect .....
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 23 December 2012 14: 38
      +4
      The restoration of small-scale construction of the Mi-26 for the Russian Armed Forces may spur interest in them from commercial customers. Of course, the production of these machines in Rostov will never reach the late Soviet levels (three dozen a year), but reaching the planned six units every year seems quite real.
      True, the Russian Ministry of Defense has not yet shown interest in the upgraded version of the machine - the Mi-26T2 with a reduced crew, modern avionics and better operational performance, preferring a well-developed and cheaper modification. Nevertheless, a stable state order for it can contribute to the more rapid development of the Mi-26T2.
      Production of Mi-26 helicopters in 2001-2012:

      2001 - 0 2003 - 1 2005 - 0 2007 - 2 2009 - 1 2011 - 4

      2002 - 0 2004 - 1 2006 - 1 2008 - 2 2010 - 1 2012 - 7
      1. stranik72
        stranik72 23 December 2012 19: 44
        +2
        The restoration of small-scale production for the Moscow Region will not make it possible to show interest in it for one reason that I mentioned above (nothing new has been implemented in it), and the profitability of its production for the plant is very low, the reasons for the state order, i.e. the purchase price is not very . Plus, an intermediary represented by Obronoprom and Helicopters of Russia, spitting the price of a bank loan for the production of helicopters, etc., etc., therefore, the salaries of the factory workers are not at all very good, the cash-talkers do not count for the development of production and R&D on MI-26 the order is not enough, God forbid, the plant at least get a penny profit.
        1. Mitek
          Mitek 23 December 2012 22: 32
          +1
          And above you wrote that this helicopter is not worth the money that the MO pays for it ..



          stranik72 Today, 13:51
          . Undoubtedly, it’s good that they were delivered, but let's not deceive each other the same 26 as 25 years ago, for a small change in the on-board equipment, mainly radio-electronic, which is not worth the price that the Moscow Defense Ministry paid for helicopters.
    2. smel
      smel 23 December 2012 15: 27
      +1
      They don’t build here. In the East there is the city of Arsenyev in Primorye. There unfinished cars from the times of the USSR rotted on the stockpiles as far back as 5 years ago. Something is quietly gathered. I don’t know the situation today. There were more than 50 pieces in the metal line.
  8. 11 black
    11 black 23 December 2012 13: 19
    24
    Russia needs such helicopters, transport aviation needs to be restored !!! By the way, in the Indian tender they lost not because something is worse than a Chinook, but because the Indian Army does not need such heavy helicopters, and ours broke the price ... by the way, here is an interesting REAL photo from the history of this helicopter, when an American Chinook was shot down in Afghanistan they asked ours for help, and ours helped with a "Russian scale" bully ...No comments laughing

    1. sergo0000
      sergo0000 23 December 2012 14: 15
      +7
      11 black,
      5 plus! We have in the north of Russia an indispensable machine for oil workers and power line builders! Wherever the all-terrain vehicle and heavy tracked vehicles go, MI-26 will always come to the rescue! drinks hi
      Well, sometimes even MI-10! Although these machines in recent years I have almost never seen.
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 23 December 2012 15: 03
      +3
      Quote: 11 black
      What kind of helicopters Russia needs, transport aviation must be restored !!! By the way, in the Indian tender they lost not because something is worse than a chinook, but because the Indian army does not need such heavy helicopters, and ours broke the price ... by the way, here is an interesting REAL photo from the history of this helicopter, when an Amersian Chinook was shot down in Afghanistan they asked ours for help, and ours helped with the "Russian scale" bully ... no comment laughing

      And you say, out of date, out of date .. good
    3. Professor
      Professor 23 December 2012 15: 42
      +9
      Transport helicopters are in demand all over the world:
      Civil helicopters in service in Afghanistan



      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 23 December 2012 16: 05
        11
        And here is another interesting fact
        1. Committee
          Committee 23 December 2012 16: 19
          0
          Oh well, it can't be! And what is the carrying capacity?
          1. Narkom
            Narkom 23 December 2012 19: 45
            +2
            18500 on the suspension
  9. SmacXnumx
    SmacXnumx 23 December 2012 13: 47
    +3
    Awesome photo !!
  10. Committee
    Committee 23 December 2012 15: 49
    +7
    Guys, not in the subject, but still important! The ban on "adopting" Russian children by amers infringed on the interests of organizations selling human organs, from there such screams.
  11. Geokingxnumx
    Geokingxnumx 23 December 2012 17: 09
    +1
    I did not know where to write it and vibrated in this thread
    look)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hIlByDjAQag
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Fs74LBsAQDo
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=djDB4CpAozs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OplWrXDPAyY
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ovS0MKE_OJU
    held all the blows) if I'm not mistaken this is t-72M
    1. sashka
      sashka 24 December 2012 07: 01
      +2
      Geokingxnumx,
      Still in Russian to write correctly and it would be really cool.
  12. Olegovi4
    Olegovi4 23 December 2012 17: 14
    +1
    Who knows how 31 episodes differ from 32? And about 52 pieces for everyone ... we need so much ourselves.
  13. es.d
    es.d 23 December 2012 17: 51
    +1
    a complete new standard dark gray-colored Russian Air Force ...

    In catching up the question Olegovi4
    Specialists, please tell me.
  14. Santa Fe
    Santa Fe 23 December 2012 23: 38
    +2
    new standard dark gray-colored Russian Air Force


    "Standard Dark Gray" has always been the US Air Force paint.
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 24 December 2012 01: 09
      -2
      +100500 and there is nothing beautiful in it.
  15. understudy
    understudy 24 December 2012 00: 35
    +2
    Quote: Mikelanjelo
    What a cow, this is a whale


    "Cow" is a historical name. There will be another turntable - there will be a different name. And this one is "Cow"! request
  16. lelikas
    lelikas 24 December 2012 01: 17
    0

    Everyone’s favorite channel - :)
  17. sashka
    sashka 24 December 2012 07: 09
    0
    For "such" figures it is necessary to execute. But we LOVE .. Before we did it in a month, now in a year .. In principle, the END OF THE YEAR. SHOULD REPORT ..
  18. Sober
    Sober 24 December 2012 10: 10
    +1
    7? for post-perestroika time is dofig! Well done .. but the main quality! fast is not always good! and 52 cars in a year, what else will be (a week left) is normal .. not super of course, but not bad!
    1. sashka
      sashka 24 December 2012 10: 53
      0
      Sober,
      Unfortunately, not a fact ..
    2. sashka
      sashka 24 December 2012 11: 21
      0
      Sober,
      Twenty years old "bullshit." push a lot or a little .. Tandem EbioMat. Who do we work for? The State Department.?
  19. sashka
    sashka 24 December 2012 10: 56
    +1
    Not bad THIS HOW .. ??? Stumble?