Military Review

The UN adopted a resolution condemning the burning of the Koran and other sacred books

15
The UN adopted a resolution condemning the burning of the Koran and other sacred books

The recent case of the burning of the Koran by an Iraqi immigrant in Stockholm, exactly during the celebration of Eid al-Adha, caused a wide resonance in the world community.


A number of Muslim countries strongly condemned what happened in Sweden. In particular, in Iraq, large protests were held near the Swedish embassy, ​​and the country's authorities demanded to extradite the offender to the sacred scripture.

What happened was condemned in our country. The Russian Foreign Ministry warned that such actions could lead to unpredictable and extremely negative consequences.

In turn, the UN Human Rights Council voted for a resolution condemning the burning of the Koran and other sacred books. The document emphasizes the need for mandatory implementation of international human rights. Consequently, states in which such incidents occur must hold their organizers and perpetrators accountable.

In this regard, the HRC recommends that the authorities of various states eliminate gaps in national laws and the legal framework of the country that prevent the prosecution of incitement to hatred on religious grounds.

The above resolution was supported by representatives of 28 states, 12 voted against and 7 abstained. Russia is in favor of the document, but did not participate in the voting, as it is no longer a member of the UNHRC.
15 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rocket757
    rocket757 12 July 2023 14: 40
    0
    The UN adopted a resolution condemning the burning of the Koran and other sacred books
    . Why are they suddenly? Have the minke whales decided to suck up to the Muslim leaders? The UN, this is practically their office ... alas, alas, now it is like that.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 12 July 2023 16: 39
      +2
      So this resolution was not prepared by the West.
      They lost this battle. Purely. bully

      1. Poplar
        Poplar 12 July 2023 20: 55
        +2
        Interesting plate. Of the Gay Europeans, no one voted "for", we will not count the outskirts, although they shout that "we are Europe." Most likely, the Sumerians decided to wave the rejepa. And of the non-Europeans "against" only Costa Rica. We don’t count mattresses either, because someone has to lead Europe.
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 12 July 2023 14: 42
    +1
    A number of Muslim countries strongly condemned what happened in Sweden.
    And Erdogan approved the entry of Sweden into NATO!
  3. Appraiser
    Appraiser 12 July 2023 14: 45
    +1
    The UN was created after the Second World War by the countries participating in the anti-Hitler coalition, which replaced the "League of Nations", as it was supposed to prevent future wars, but this does not happen at the present stage of the world order.
    I think that in the near future it is worth closing the UN altogether, since it is a non-working organization dancing to the tune of "chosen" states.
    1. Moonlight
      Moonlight 12 July 2023 18: 56
      0
      The very principle of intervention is dangerous: groups are found within countries that see the escalation of internal conflict into an international war as a way to achieve their political goals, and international relations are overwhelmed with offers too tempting for hawks. By rejecting the Westphalian principles, humanity has placed itself in a great danger that no one can break into any house, say that he does not like the lifestyle of the owners, and start throwing bombs around the rooms.
  4. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 12 July 2023 14: 47
    0
    Guess from three times who was against this resolution? Sweden - time ...
  5. AdAstra
    AdAstra 12 July 2023 14: 48
    +2
    Does a burned biology textbook fall under this?
    1. Million
      Million 12 July 2023 14: 58
      +2
      Eco you turned down! The people will not understand) .......
      1. AdAstra
        AdAstra 12 July 2023 15: 03
        +2
        Okay, then, and the burnt Giordano Bruno...?
  6. Igor Borisov_2
    Igor Borisov_2 12 July 2023 14: 49
    0
    And Sweden will say - we voted against and will continue to organize such actions. Nobody cares about the UN - a dead cow ...
  7. alexoff
    alexoff 12 July 2023 14: 56
    0
    The whole Evraykh voted against, but Ukraine voted for, they are still closer to the Turks
  8. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 12 July 2023 15: 01
    0
    Okay, I’ll take off the intrigue, the red ones are who are for burning religious books. And what will happen if their Declaration of Independence is burned in front of the US Embassy.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 12 July 2023 16: 47
      +3
      Quote: tralflot1832
      And what will happen if their Declaration of Independence is burned in front of the US Embassy

      But nothing. Satanists in power in the States themselves have already burned it many times with their deeds.
      From today's:
      In the United States began to conduct research on the creation of human-animal hybrids. This is reported by the Fox News channel. It is specified that scientists intend to start with pigs.

      The researchers argue that this would benefit medicine. For example, donor organs can be used from such creatures, and various drugs and treatments can be tested on them.

      They started with pigs..!
      Or another:
      The US Department of Justice has removed child sex trafficking from its list of "problem areas".

      Now it's not a problem for them.
      Unfortunately, Mikhalkov was not mistaken.
    2. dump22
      dump22 14 July 2023 11: 51
      0
      And what will happen if their Declaration of Independence is burned in front of the US Embassy.


      It's nothing.
      There was a decision of their Supreme Court that this is not a crime.