The United States refused to provide Russia with information on the location of strategic weapons falling under the START

60
The United States refused to provide Russia with information on the location of strategic weapons falling under the START

The United States is ceasing to transmit to Russia data on the status and location of its strategic weapons subject to the START Treaty. This statement was made by the US State Department.

The United States is finally burying START by ceasing to fulfill the conditions stipulated by the treaty. As stated in the State Department, from June 1, 2023, the United States will stop transmitting information to Russia about the location and status of strategic weapons. In addition, the Americans are revoking all visas issued to Russian specialists for inspections under START and no longer intend to issue new ones. However, the United States has not allowed our specialists into its territory for a long time, so there is nothing new in this.

Also, from June 1, the United States will stop providing Russia with telemetric information about the launches of American intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles.



The fact that the Americans would no longer provide Russia with information about their strategic nuclear weapons became known back in March of this year. According to the assistant to the head of the Pentagon, John Plum, this is due, first of all, to the end of the six-month period during which the parties exchanged data under the New START. Prior to this, Washington accused Russia of allegedly refusing to provide such information and decided to take "countermeasures." By suspending the provision of information, the United States wants to "return" Russia to the treaty.

Russia officially suspended participation in the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) from March 1 this year, the decree was signed by Vladimir Putin. The decision was made in connection with the ongoing hostile policy of the United States and the West in general towards our country. Threats to achieve the "defeat" of Russia in any way, calls for the collapse of the Russian state could not remain without a corresponding reaction from the Kremlin.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    60 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +15
      1 June 2023 22: 52
      And what did the Americans achieve? Since June 1, 2023, the Higher World has more the chance of "the whole world in dust" because of the technical or intellectual error. Let’s still cut the phone so that the Black -Great Minister of Defense of the United States could not get through to Shoigu with the question: is this a military launch of the Sarmatian or a test? then without any START until the 80s they lived and nothing, though someone on duty was on a "platoon". Yes, the root of the plant on them, they will be more careful. No matter how it flew across the USA and not in one copy.
      1. +1
        1 June 2023 23: 17
        The United States will not arrive on one.

        Quote: tralflot1832
        Black Sea Minister of Defense of the United States

        Oh, are you also for denazification?
        1. +4
          1 June 2023 23: 52
          Yes, this agreement was generally unprofitable for us, because, unlike them, we will go to heaven.
          1. +1
            2 June 2023 06: 37
            Quote: Commissar Kitten
            Yes, this agreement was generally unprofitable for us, because, unlike them, we will go to heaven.

            laughing laughing laughing upvoted for sense of humor
            1. +4
              2 June 2023 18: 35
              Russian inspectors have not visited the United States since 2020.
              And to take the Anglo-Saxons at their word is not to respect yourself
        2. -4
          2 June 2023 00: 48
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Black Sea Minister of Defense of the United States


          Oh, are you also for denazification?


          Are you out of touch with reality? Isn't the US Secretary of Defense Black Sea? What are you, colorblind?
        3. -1
          2 June 2023 09: 05
          Are you also for denazification?

          no, Yaroslav, this smacks of racism, but the idea is good.)
      2. -10
        1 June 2023 23: 32
        Russia's nuclear potential has long prevented the whole world from turning into dust. If in 1990 there were more than 10500 warheads and all were deployed, then by 2016 there were 1700 of them left (plus 700 warheads of strategic aviation in warehouses)

        Moreover, American analysts modeling a nuclear war voiced the opinion that it would not be enough to destroy the United States. Significantly, Russia's reaction was (before the NWO) the following: the statement that the death of tens of millions of Americans as a result of a nuclear war is an acceptable damage (for the destruction of 80-90% of the population of Russia) is irresponsible. With the beginning of the NWO, Russia's position was adjusted to "the whole world is in ruins."

        So START has done its job. No more the whole world in dust.
        1. +9
          1 June 2023 23: 49
          Quote from: blackGRAIL
          Russia's nuclear potential has long prevented the whole world from turning into dust.

          Did someone tell you this, or do you know it yourself? wink
          START prohibits placing more than 10 BGs on the Sarmatians.
          Now we can bet up to 15. This is just one example. hi
          1. 0
            2 June 2023 00: 18
            Quote: Alex777
            START prohibits placing more than 10 BGs on the Sarmatians.
            Now we can put up to 15
            What about the meaning? The breeding radius is about 100 km. All the same, it turns out "one missile - one target", the difference is only in the coverage area.
            1. 0
              2 June 2023 00: 43
              Is it already possible to laugh, or are you from the kingdom of Solomon? ...
            2. +4
              2 June 2023 01: 14
              Quote: bk0010
              What about the meaning? The breeding radius is about 100 km.

              Do you know how many "buses" there are in Sarmat? wink
              Hint: as many as Vanguards.
              1. +5
                2 June 2023 02: 41
                Quote: Alex777
                Do you know how many "buses" there are in Sarmat?
                Hint: as many as Vanguards.

                I didn’t know such a detail ... this seriously expands the capabilities of one carrier. But the main question is how many such carriers do we have? And in what condition the Voevod remaining in service ... after all, they are already expired, and the Yuzhnoye design bureau has not been servicing since 2014. It is not known how much it was possible to organize the maintenance of technical suitability on our own, and at least I would like to hope for the best, but it would be better to quickly replace all the "Voivods" with "Sarmatians" ... and for this, how many more years of shock work are needed.
                On the other hand, new Borey-A SSBNs are coming into operation, and if the Dolphins are left in service, then it is the naval strategic nuclear forces that will grow in the most natural way.
                And the refusal of the United States to share data on strategic nuclear forces with us can only testify to one thing - START ordered to live long and now we are no longer connected with anything. It is possible to return to all carriers of warheads up to the full set, equip the TA of all submarines of the KR "Caliber" in nuclear equipment, return torpedoes with nuclear warheads on board all submarines, deploy additional ground systems "Yars" (for the benefit of them, apart from hangars and maintenance staff, there is nothing special necessary) . It would be nice to launch a series of secret-based container-type launchers and begin their deployment. Moreover, these launchers should be designed both for conventional "Caliber" with nuclear warheads, and for "Zircons" and "Caliber-M" (if these heavier and longer-range missiles are already at least in prototypes).
                MRBM is also a burning issue. The INF Treaty has long been denounced, and we still adhere to our obligations not to deploy the IRBM in Europe ... We are at war with Europe! Isn't it a strategic potential to spend on this? KR with numerous NATO aviation and the presence of AWACS aircraft make such a carrier not very reliable. They are good as a second strike when airfields and command centers have already been hit, and they will not be given critical countermeasures. And the "Dagger" on the MiG-31K has a vulnerability from the first sudden strike of the enemy. What is needed is the MRBM covering the range of the whole of Europe with adjacent islands, the Mediterranean ... and not only for the European theater of operations they are needed. They are also needed in the Far East. moreover, based both in Chukotka and in Transbaikalia and Primorye - to destroy all US bases in the region, their bases in Alaska, as well as the west coast of the USA and Canada. That is, the missile must have a Pioneer + IRBM range. That is, it is urgent to launch the Rubezh IRBM into the series.
                And it is also urgent to compose the first stage for the "Dagger" to turn this missile into a classic IRBM with a range of about 2000 km. It will be a relatively light rocket, and a modified Iskander-M engine can act as the first stage.
                I’m just afraid that we no longer have time for all these events and we will have to fight with what we have.
                But nevertheless, doing all of the above must begin yesterday.
                1. +2
                  2 June 2023 14: 50
                  Quote: bayard
                  I didn’t know such a detail ... this seriously expands the capabilities of one carrier. But the main question is how many such carriers do we have?

                  Yes. Sarmat he is. 3 "buses" on it can be.
                  This directly indicates that we were preparing in advance for
                  "tricks", our "partners". And well prepared.
                  Quantity: the question is of course an interesting, secret one. wink

                  Quote: bayard
                  START ordered to live long and now we are no longer bound by anything

                  In words, we observe it, but in reality we need it?

                  Quote: bayard
                  MRBM is also a burning issue.

                  Zircon is quite the topic. The bastion is not difficult to remake.

                  Quote: bayard
                  That is, it is urgent to launch the Rubezh IRBM into the series.

                  Something completely new - it will be a big variety. hi
                  1. +2
                    3 June 2023 03: 07
                    Quote: Alex777
                    Zircon is quite the topic. The bastion is not difficult to remake.

                    "Bastion" is not difficult to redo, and they are probably already redoing / redone, but ... range. 1000 km+ is not enough. In addition, there are already "Daggers", which, although air-based, but the range is already 2000 km. And we need to cover the entire European continent up to the Portuguese ports. moreover, it is desirable to deliver such strikes from the depths of the European part of the country. That is why we need a new "Pioneer" - multi-headed and with a range of 5000 - 6000 km. This will be just right in the Far East - according to American bases in the region and so that they can get most of the US west coast from Chukotka. There, for him ("Frontier") and bases with adits in the mountain from the late Union have been prepared - restore, use.
                    The USSR planned to keep 100 Pioneers in the Far East, and this was fully justified.
                    "Frontier" was developed and tested as an ICBM (range 6500 km.), But at the insistence of the United States, it was not launched into the series. But all the documentation and equipment is there, and the rocket itself is based on Topol / Yars, only shorter.
                    We do not have superiority in aviation, this superiority (and overwhelming) is with NATO. This means that our KR can be effectively intercepted under the control of AWACS aircraft. So all our KR are second-strike missiles. The Iskander-M has insufficient range for a European theater of operations. The "Dagger" is vulnerable to a preventive / preemptive strike on airfields. But mobile launchers of the MRBM will be just right. and preferably two types at once:
                    - IRBM with a range of up to 2000 km. - a light IRBM with one head with the "Dagger" as the second stage and the first stage based on the engine from the "Iskander-M",
                    - heavy IRBM with 3 - 6 - 10 BBs with a range of 5500 - 6500 km. based on "Yars", namely - "Frontier". Such a one from the Volga region will cover all of Europe like a bull to a sheep. It is desirable to increase the number of such missiles to 50 - 100 pieces. in the European part of the country, and the same number in the Far East (half in Transbaikalia, the second in Chukotka).
                    And we will be happy.
                    and if the allies ask, then it is possible to deploy several dozen of these in Venezuela. The cost of one such missile is equal to the cost of a modern fighter (ours) ... and there will be much more benefit.
                    Quote: Alex777
                    it will be a big variety.

                    If the total series will be two or three hundred only deployed missiles ... what kind of variety is there? This is the return of one of the main classes of strategic missiles.
                    And the Kinzhal-2G (two-stage, ground) is a light class of IRBM for more flexible use at a shorter distance than the Frontier.
                    In addition, both the MiG-31 and the Tu-22M3 will be written off in ten years ... and these missiles will be deployed by that time.
                    Har-mo-oniya. fellow
                    In addition, Healthy Militarism is very useful for the Economy, the morale of the Society, the positive perception of Russia in the world and the satisfaction of the own ego of the RF authorities. Yes Everything is one to one. bully
                    hi
          2. -1
            2 June 2023 00: 28
            We have 1700 warheads for ICBMs alone (more precisely, 1000 and 700 for SLBMs). And How officially declared GDP we have no plans to build them up, despite the fate of the New START Treaty (unless the US starts building up its own). And the Americans are happy with everything.
            1. +2
              2 June 2023 03: 12
              Quote from: blackGRAIL
              We have 1700 warheads for ICBMs alone

              According to START, there should be no more than 1550 pieces. , but this is based on ONE CR on a bomber. If we consider real possibilities with a full charge of bombers and the return of all APs to carriers (up to a complete set), then in a single salvo there may be more than 2000 APs. I think even up to 2500. But this is hypothetical, when all the necessary procedures are carried out.
              Quote from: blackGRAIL
              And as the GDP officially announced, we have no plans to increase them

              In a threatened period (and now it is just such), all promises lose their strength and meaning.
              Quote from: blackGRAIL
              unless the United States starts building up its

              It is extremely difficult for them to do this - there is no capacity for the production of nuclear warheads, they would be able to replace their old ones with an already released resource. And the Minutemen are in far from the best condition (and their heads are rotten). And the Ohio SSBN ... is in far from the best condition - they are already old, not everyone will be able to go to sea. And from the bases they may not shoot.
              Quote from: blackGRAIL
              . And the Americans are happy with everything.

              That is why they "are satisfied with everything" - it is important for them to force us, even with a carcass, even with a stuffed animal, but to keep us within the framework of the contract. For they themselves no longer have the number of BBs that they claim.
              But they simply have a critical situation, and they do not know how to lose, they do not like and do not want to. Therefore, together with France and England, they can decide on any follies.
              Therefore, you should hit first. And start immediately with a knockout. There are means for this. There would be Will.
      3. +10
        1 June 2023 23: 37
        Quote: tralflot1832
        And what did the Americans achieve?

        We are now burying the START Treaty.
        For once, the initiative is ours.
        The contract was signed until 05.02.2026.
        And there is no chance of its extension.
        Therefore, there is no need to regret / pull. hi
        1. +1
          1 June 2023 23: 56
          Alex777. All these STARTs limited us, for example, how to count Poseidon, Sarmat and Avangard. Poseidon as a new class is not included in START, Vanguard - you don’t understand at all, Sarmat - maybe he has a "bus" with two rows of seats? That's why the Americans and climbed on the foam with a one-sided inspection. But it didn’t work out. I believe that the Vanguard and Poseidon do not fit under the START Treaty in any way. Let them prove it. hi
          1. +2
            2 June 2023 01: 21
            Quote: tralflot1832
            I believe that Vanguard and Poseidon do not fit under START in any way

            That is why there is no chance of extension in the current conditions.
            When we change the conditions, then we can talk about START. hi
      4. +7
        2 June 2023 00: 15
        Biden shows willingness to cross Putin's red lines - The Washington Post

        As US officials explain, a key reason for ignoring Putin's threats is the fact that the Russian president is not sticking to his promises to punish the West for providing weapons to Ukraine.

        His bluff assured American and European leaders that they could continue to do so without serious repercussions."
        https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/01/ukraine-f-16s-biden-russia-escalation/
        Well, what can I say, they cross them for it, nothing is done!
      5. +1
        2 June 2023 22: 36
        Now, on every corner they will "trumpet" that the Russians were the first to withdraw from the treaty, and they "doves of peace" did everything in response. By the way, in this statement for the first time notes about the desire to "agree" were heard. And they can't be trusted.
    2. +16
      1 June 2023 22: 54
      I already wrote about this, in May, I will duplicate it again:

      In fact, this is a continuation of the April story.
      According to the START (Strategic Offensive Arms Treaty), at the end of each six months, the US and Russia exchange data on their nuclear forces. The next exchange was supposed to take place at the end of April, 2023. Shortly before that, on February 28, Putin signed a law suspending Russia's participation in the agreement. In the 20th of April, a Pentagon spokesman said that, "as a diplomatic countermeasure," they would also stop supplying Russia with their data on nuclear weapons, probably wanting to force us to change our decision

      So this is the continuation of the story.
      We, according to the suspension of participation signed by Putin, did not supply the data.
      The Americans answered, as we see, mirror

      I don't know for whom it came as a surprise, for me, it was all expected



      ps
      Someone did not like the document signed by the President?)
      minus))
      1. +2
        1 June 2023 23: 14
        We, according to the suspension of participation signed by Putin, did not supply the data.
        The Americans answered, as we see, mirror

        Don't you think that our actions have become a "mirror" response?

        As stated in the State Department, from June 1, 2023, the United States will stop transmitting information to Russia about the location and status of strategic weapons. Besides, Americans revoke all visas issued to Russian specialists for inspections under START and no longer intend to issue new ones. However, The United States has not allowed our specialists into its territory for a long time, so there is nothing new in this.

        We should have done this a long time ago, and not wait for the Americans to come to their senses. And they, as always, bend their line and at the same time blame Russia for everything.
      2. +6
        1 June 2023 23: 15
        Even if you write 2x2=4 across the party line, they will downvote.
        1. -1
          1 June 2023 23: 52
          So after all, in the party they appointed 2 * 2 = 4! Or is it because the link is to an American arithmetic textbook? laughing
          1. +3
            2 June 2023 01: 00
            - The Americans were the first to land on the moon, and the CPSU sends you first to the sun.
            - It's so hot in there.
            - There are no fools in the Party! Fly at night.
            1. +2
              2 June 2023 03: 17
              Quote: forty-eighth
              - The Americans were the first to land on the moon, and the CPSU sends you first to the sun.
              - It's so hot in there.
              - There are no fools in the Party! Fly at night.


              There is another anecdote:

              In the presidiums of the CPSU Party, only those who were elected by ordinary communists were seated. According to the Charter.

              And our people are terribly talented, only they
              The party got bad. The country got bad.
              Neighbors got bad.
              The world is bad.
              And therefore the Supreme calls us to Paradise. Hopes that at least we get a good Paradise. laughing
            2. -1
              2 June 2023 20: 52
              Well, if you look at the current president of the United States, SO our Leonid Ilyich is simply beautiful !!!
      3. 0
        1 June 2023 23: 19
        Vyacheslav, don't worry. We'll fix it for you. Try to ignore the negatives. hi
    3. 0
      1 June 2023 23: 16
      the logical ending of this document ..............................................
    4. +1
      1 June 2023 23: 22
      Well, happy new year...
      The arrogant Americans extended the contract, wanting us to fulfill it unilaterally, not allowing our inspectors.
      But what they got was the absence of an agreement, which, in the current state of air defense / missile defense and nuclear triads, they actually need more.
      You can revive the American economy by building bunkers, storing food and cartridges there, and even better - dollars (they are eternal, value, aren't they?)
      1. 0
        2 June 2023 00: 28
        Quote: faterdom
        You can revive the American economy by building bunkers, storing food and cartridges there, and even better - dollars (they are eternal, value, aren't they?)

        The main thing to remember is that virtual ones and zeros need to be marinated in separate barrels for better preservation! tongue laughing
    5. +2
      1 June 2023 23: 25
      Quote: alystan
      And they, as always, bend their line and at the same time blame Russia for everything

      Everyone is the same in this.
      Everyone sticks their own line
      Everyone is blaming others
      Let's do this - remember at least one case in history when the current government (of any country!) Would say - yes, we are completely wrong, we are unprofessional, from now on we will listen to our yesterday's enemies in everything!
      1. +5
        1 June 2023 23: 43
        Quote from sdivt
        []

        Let's do this - remember at least one case in history when the current government (of any country!) Would say - yes, we are completely wrong, we are unprofessional, from now on we will listen to our yesterday's enemies in everything!
        It seems that Gorbachev said so. Or Yeltsin..
      2. +1
        2 June 2023 00: 06
        Quote from sdivt
        Let's do this - remember at least one case in history when the current government (of any country!) Would say - yes, we are completely wrong, we are unprofessional, from now on we will listen to our yesterday's enemies in everything!

        In fact, this is a fairly common phenomenon, in which case officials (or the entire government) resign. Because yesterday's enemies in such a situation should not be listened to, but a chair in the office should be vacated for them.
      3. -2
        2 June 2023 03: 27
        Quote from sdivt
        Let's do this - remember at least one case in history when the current government (of any country!) Would say - yes, we are completely wrong, we are unprofessional, from now on we will listen to our yesterday's enemies in everything!

        Let's this way and that and remember yourself that there are such states whose activities do not require curtsy, but are only a response to the ambitions of those who have appointed themselves the rulers of the world. In this regard, the USSR (Russia) has a presentable appearance in comparison with those who unleashed 209 conflicts in their history and prescribed in their doctrine the possibility of delivering a preventive nuclear strike.
    6. +4
      1 June 2023 23: 35
      here the can again hit the ground
      1. +2
        2 June 2023 00: 02
        One American wrote: "Joe Biden is our Boris Yeltsin!"


        I would only add - "Only sober."
        1. 0
          2 June 2023 13: 28
          Quote: alystan
          One American wrote: "Joe Biden is our Boris Yeltsin!"

          Quote: alystan
          I would only add - "Only sober."

          Not quite yet - he hasn’t peed on the chassis of his plane yet. Maybe he's just in a diaper though.
      2. +2
        2 June 2023 00: 34
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        here the can again hit the ground

        How rude, not fabulous.
        Needed: ~ "Hit the ground and turn into a clear-falcon!" hi
        1. -1
          2 June 2023 07: 38
          Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
          "Hitted the ground and turned into a jasna-falcon!"

          the trend will be "and turned into a red maiden"
      3. -1
        2 June 2023 01: 40
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        here the can again hit the ground


        Don't you see, a meeting is just being held and the president himself is forced to teach his military to crawl on the bellies, as well as actions on command - "flash on the right."
      4. The comment was deleted.
    7. -2
      1 June 2023 23: 50
      The United States is finally burying START by ceasing to fulfill the conditions stipulated by the treaty.

      Well, that's great, to be honest. The Americans needed START more than we did, because they could crush any of their potential adversaries with conventional weapons. And the nuclear baton is like that - it made some fixed number of charges, and that’s it: no more is needed, it’s enough to erase the complex overland life from the face of our ball anyway. So now we can secure guaranteed security even without superiority in conventional weapons.
      It remains to understand what this treaty prevented the Americans from doing. Are they already working for the Chinese perspective?

      PS Sometimes, when reading historical materials about the Cold War era, I wondered what it was like to live under the constant threat of nuclear bombardment. Here we find out... winked
      1. +5
        2 June 2023 00: 02
        This threat has never gone away. They simply lived in the illusion of the world, they wanted to believe in the best and the same in a Western person.
      2. +3
        2 June 2023 00: 08

        PS Sometimes, when reading historical materials about the Cold War era, I wondered what it was like to live under the constant threat of nuclear bombardment. Let's find out... winked
        And you do not think, in the light of historical events. That it is necessary to withdraw not from START, but from the NPT. The Americans have not followed it for a long time. We are just going to Belarus. Although everyone in the world, and not just Eun, understands. The only chance to avoid bombing from the United States and their sixes is only nuclear weapons. It's not us who carry our crap with bombs all over the world. In addition to Khokhlrstan and the half-dead Balkats, no one wants to attack us directly. But the United States gouging with pleasure 4/5 of the whole world.
        1. 0
          2 June 2023 10: 01
          Quote from A2AD
          That it is necessary to withdraw not from START, but from the NPT.

          No, it doesn't. Unlike the START, the NPT does not impose any restrictions on us, just like on the Americans. The NPT is a means for the active nuclear powers to maintain their monopoly on ultimate weapons. And it is beneficial to everyone who possesses nuclear weapons and for whom this right is recognized, but not beneficial to everyone else. Both we and the US need the NPT, because neither we nor they will benefit from the spread of nuclear weapons around the world.
          Quote from A2AD
          The only chance to avoid bombing from the United States and their sixes is only nuclear weapons.

          This is true, but Russia already has nuclear weapons. Why would she withdraw from the NPT? Our country, on the contrary, must make efforts to prevent the emergence of new holders of nuclear weapons, which could shake the uniqueness of our nuclear status. The same can be said about the States.
          Quote from A2AD
          But the United States gouging with pleasure 4/5 of the whole world.

          Any normal power, if possible, will gouge by one means or another 4/5 of the whole world, imposing its will on it, if it has such an opportunity. I hope that if Russia has such opportunities, it will not be an exception.
    8. +1
      1 June 2023 23: 56
      Quote: Katya_Ivanova
      It seems that Gorbachev said so. Or Yeltsin..

      I will gladly believe you! I always believe in everyone
      But suddenly someone doubts? Would you bring proofs, or something ...
    9. +1
      2 June 2023 00: 05
      Quote from: blackGRAIL
      Russia's nuclear potential has long prevented the whole world from turning into dust. If in 1990 there were more than 10500 warheads and all were deployed, then by 2016 there were 1700 of them left

      I don't want to disappoint you, but even the total nuclear potential of ALL countries is not capable of turning the whole world into dust.
      Yes, the media still scare their readers with horror stories from the time of Sakharov, who proposed turning the US territory into a strait.
      Not a bad idea, in general, but - alas, all this is modeled and remodeled, the conclusion is unambiguous, humanity is not yet capable of it.
      Not today, not in the foreseeable future
      1. -1
        2 June 2023 00: 21
        Quote from sdivt
        I don't want to disappoint you, but even the total nuclear potential of ALL countries is not capable of turning the whole world into dust.
        Why peace? All the more so. Two warheads from different carriers for each target, plus a margin for technical failures and good luck with missile defense - and that's enough.
      2. +1
        2 June 2023 00: 51
        For some reason, many people think that nuclear dust is when we all instantly burn out or receive a lethal dose of radiation. In fact, during a nuclear apocalypse, no more than five percent of the population directly subjected to nuclear strikes will die at once. Then, within a few months, another ten percent will die due to acute radiation sickness, cardiovascular exacerbations and other pathologies aggravated by stress, mental trauma and other pathogenic factors. But the main reason for the mass extinction of people will be social problems caused by the economic collapse on a planetary scale. People will lose the ability to provide for their basic needs and begin to die of hunger. Plus, bloody conflicts flare up everywhere on the basis of the bandit redistribution of the remnants of resources. Thus, in a year or two, no more than half of the current population with a crippled psyche and self-organization at the level of a wolf pack will remain from the planet. Without mobile phones, without the Internet, without Coca-Cola and without any hope of returning all the delights of civilization in the foreseeable future.
    10. +1
      2 June 2023 00: 27
      So from now on, any test launch of a ballistic missile can be interpreted as the start of a nuclear attack. With all the ensuing consequences.
      1. +2
        2 June 2023 00: 41
        so from now on, any test launch of a ballistic missile

        do not scare the illiterate - no one canceled the launch notification. IT is interpreted and regulated in OTHER documents. As they announced, they will be so, looking for a lot of things they will do and not do, from what they agreed on in addition to START.
    11. 0
      2 June 2023 00: 38
      U.S. stops sending Russia information on the location and status of strategic weapons


      Frightened the jog with a naked booty
      ... laughing

      It was IM who needed START ... feel
      Point by point if -
      "do not transmit the location" - as if they gave us the coordinates of the nuclear submarine with the BR, and everything else is theirs stationary, their coordinates are known 100 years ahead. So let our PGRKs are now looking for in our vast expanses. Now they are unlimited...
      "do not transmit telemetry" - fuck their hundred years old well-known telemetry gave up. And we gave them telemetry of the newly developed ICBMs ...

      So, who won, who lost - let them look for a stupid one in their head. wassat
    12. +1
      2 June 2023 00: 46
      Die USA, aber auch die dummen Europäer werden sich noch blutend
      die Zeiten solcher internationaler Vereinbarungen zurück wünschen...!!!

      Die USA hatten schon unter dem "Kriegs-Nobelpreisträger" und Völkermörder Obama vor, sich an keine Verträge - ganz gleich welcher Art - zu halten!!
      Statt einer Reduzierung von US-amerikanischen Atomwaffen, hat man diese entgegen der vertraglichen Vereinbarungen überall in Europa verteilt und ernsthaft geglaubt, die Russen wären so dumm diesen miesen Trick nicht zu durchschauen..!?

      Es ist längst höchste Zeit, dass endlich LÄNDER wie die USA und
      England auf ihren eigenen Territorien HART dafür bestraft werden,
      wie sie seit Jahrhunderten weltweit Mord- und Totschlag verbreiten und selbst dabei fast nie etwas abbekommen haben!!
      Erst wenn auch US-Americaner und Briten knietief in ihrem eigenen
      Blut baden müssen, wird diese Welt einen Hauch von GERECHTIGKEIT erhalten...!!!!!!!!!

      Es darf keinen Frieden geben, bevor nicht auch der Letzte NAZI in der
      Ukraine mit dem Kopf auf den Hackblock gelegt und enthauptet wurde!!
      Außerdem muss das gesamte Territorium der "ehemaligen Ukraine" zu russischem Staatsgebiet erklärt und bis zu den Grenzen Polens in den jetzigen Grenzen absorbiert werden!
      Anderenfalls geht der kranke Irrsinn mit den Polaken als
      US-Kanonenfutter ganz sicher in die nächste Runde...!!
    13. 0
      2 June 2023 01: 27
      Generally speaking, this whole thing is bullshit. The Yanks (read: Zionists) will launch the first nukes anyway. So first, let's launch nukes to France, Great Britain, Israel and USA simultaneously and wait for further developments. There is no mercy for the Francs, Britons, Zionists and the Yanks, because they have proven in the history of what they can do. At least there won't be a COVID pandemic anymore, I hope. end of story.
    14. +1
      2 June 2023 03: 09
      it was a bad agreement to begin with ; it is only reasonable to return to a new treaty in which all NATO countries with nuclear countries on their soil accept to join the treaty , Russia allowed a bad deal because the US can still rely on other NATO allies like the UK & France to attack Russia with their nuclear arsenal.
    15. 0
      2 June 2023 11: 49
      Also, from June 1, the United States will stop providing Russia with telemetric information about the launches of American intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles.
      But this is already interesting ..., I'm talking about the triggering of early warning systems ...
    16. -4
      2 June 2023 11: 51
      We need to give up nuclear weapons altogether. Away from sin. Because "there can be no winners in a nuclear war, and it must never be unleashed." And in a conventional war, the winner is known - NATO. So maybe it's easier to just give up?
    17. +1
      2 June 2023 18: 20
      Americans are bound to disappear as a species, their heinous parasitic existence poisoning the ecosystem of the planet earth.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"