Because we were “not up to Ukraine” for a long time...
What is happening today in Ukraine, of course, is a topic for all kinds of research - from military and political to philosophical. Since gaining the so-called independence (it is difficult to say from whom and from what) Ukraine has followed only one path. The essence of this movement is the same - to retreat as far as possible, move away, run away from Russia, even if there - where you wander off, move away, run away or crawl away - a quagmire that can drag you up to your ears, up to the top of your head.
And here you can talk as much as you like about the destructive essence of the Ukrainian regime, about the fact that one government is worse than another. But does this remove responsibility from our foreign policy system, which worked according to a program (if there was one at all) concerning our immediate neighbors after the collapse of the USSR? The question is rhetorical.
You can object by saying that in the 1990s Russia had enough of its own problems, and there was “no time for Ukraine”. So that's the point. Believing that in the West we are entirely friends and comrades, our state concentrated, as it is now fashionable to say, on the inner contour so much that we did not want to look at anything further than our own nose. Marching under the banner of Waffen-SS divisions? OK. This is an isolated case… The police will intervene, the perpetrators will be punished. But the perpetrators were not punished, and after that these perpetrators ended up at the helm of the state, which was already openly spraying poison on Russia.
This hostile state appeared at our side. We believed that brothers lived there, who were just like us, and therefore they would always support us in everything. “Well, they won’t support the Banderaites, in fact ...” They did. And how. "America is with us" and stuff like that.
Nikita Mikhalkov discusses the topic in his author's program Besogon TV.
Information