The Belarusian military pulled Tochka missile systems to the Polish border

46
The Belarusian military pulled Tochka missile systems to the Polish border

Polonaise rocket systems were deployed to the western regions of Belarus, bordering Poland. Also, the Belarusian military pulled Tochka missile systems to the Polish border.

This is reported by the state news agency of the Republic of Belarus BELTA, referring to the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus.



They noted that the transfer of such a formidable weapons to the western borders gives a signal to the NATO countries that it will be involved without hesitation in the event of any manifestation of armed aggression against Belarus.

Separate units participating in the exercises and representing mechanized formations, special forces and missile troops and artillery, carry out combat training tasks in various parts of the country. It is noted that most often military personnel operate in unfamiliar terrain.

All this is happening as part of the combat readiness check in the Armed Forces of Belarus.

The commander of one of the missile battalions told BelTA journalists about the actions of his unit.

In the course of the events, the ejection and occupation of starting positions, the organization of their protection and defense, as well as the intercession of the division on combat duty at designated facilities were worked out

- He said.

It is noteworthy that militia fighters are also involved in the exercises. Among other things, they provide security on the routes of movement of military equipment. The command of the Armed Forces of Belarus is closely monitoring their actions in order to determine the possibilities and prospects for the development of this newly created component.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    15 May 2023 19: 19
    On this issue, one thing can be said: No comment!
    1. +8
      15 May 2023 19: 27
      Well done! The right way! Just don't repeat other people's mistakes...
    2. +6
      15 May 2023 19: 41
      Yes, and ours would not hurt. In the Leningrad region, Karelia. I don’t think that this complex was cut with us. They should be in storage
      1. +8
        15 May 2023 20: 42
        "Yes, and ours would not hurt"
        If it is true that there are a lot of missiles for the point in storage (10000 units), then what prevents the formation of two or three brigades and launching 20-30 missiles per day at unloading stations, warehouses, control points of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Here you have a solid addition to the efforts of Iskander and aviation to isolate the combat area, at least in the Donbass. But 100 km from the front line does not leave a single whole logistics hub. And if we also upgrade the missile guidance system (GLONASS) and use tactics correctly, in combination with the launch of Smerch and Kh-31 for air defense, then the price of the old Tochka-U will not be.
        1. +3
          15 May 2023 21: 52
          The points were in service with artillery units. These units have been retrained for the Iskander, rearmed and operational. Under the point, you need to form parts anew, and from whom - xs, with modernization too - start and finish. Plus, it’s dangerous to use the moment of the point - the Ukrainians will break their rocket into a peacekeeper or a nuclear power plant or a warehouse with some thread of rubbish, and the arrows will be transferred to us.
          1. 0
            16 May 2023 06: 46
            Yes, it is necessary. But these complexes are not so ancient that there are no more specialists left. The question is the decision of the leadership.
    3. +4
      15 May 2023 19: 43
      Quote: tralflot1832
      On this issue, one thing can be said: No comment!

      ... and without endless red lines
      1. -2
        15 May 2023 21: 54
        ... - "drawn with lipstick on the" cycle "" ... - ... - The Gospel of Matthew 7 verse 6 - synodal text: - ... "Do not give HOLY things to dogs and do not throw your PEARLS in front of pigs so that they do not trampled it down with their feet, and turning back, did not tear you to pieces."
  2. +7
    15 May 2023 19: 24
    All the news of recent years is either military hysteria, or war, or preparation for it ...
    I'm afraid to open news channels in the morning (
    1. 0
      15 May 2023 19: 30
      Preobrazhensky: If you care about your digestion - my good advice: do not talk about Bolshevism and medicine at dinner. And, God save you, do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner
      1. -5
        15 May 2023 20: 16
        Quote from Enceladus
        Preobrazhensky: If you care about your digestion - my good advice: do not talk about Bolshevism and medicine at dinner. And, God save you, do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner

        And why do I need quotes from a swindler and a flayer?
        1. -1
          15 May 2023 22: 02
          Okay, he was a cool guy.
    2. +3
      15 May 2023 19: 43
      Come on. Get used to it .. "I love the smell of napalm in the morning" (c). I'm joking, of course. Although I'm aged, I don't want to go to heaven or hell yet .. Especially children and grandchildren ..
    3. +3
      15 May 2023 19: 45
      Quote from sdivt
      All the news of recent years is either military hysteria, or war, or preparation for it ...
      I'm afraid to open news channels in the morning (

      By the way, comedies can be found on the internet.
      1. 0
        16 May 2023 01: 55
        Quote: Terenin
        By the way, comedies can be found on the internet.

        Also reports on fireworks. laughing / am
    4. +4
      15 May 2023 19: 47
      This is a logical development of events. Poland will try to increase its armament and manpower by the age of 24-25. If by that time Belarus does not build up the same thing and Russia does not finish the NWO, it will be even more fun.
    5. 0
      15 May 2023 19: 53
      In my youth, there was a ditty in Vladimirshchen:
      If they hit for the first time,
      Of course you scream
      Hit once, hit twice
      - and, you see, get used to it!
      1. +5
        15 May 2023 20: 11
        We (MSK, Sverdlovsk district) read differently:

        If the first time they hit
        You answer with a punch in the eye
        If that doesn't help
        Hands to feet and afterburner!
  3. +1
    15 May 2023 19: 28
    So that the rolls do not relax with the Poles ... and so that they do not relax even more, he gave Batka TNW charges to them good
    1. -5
      15 May 2023 20: 04
      Give yourself over the head with this charge. That's right, in response to the Republic of Belarus, after all, it will fly, and not to you.
      1. +2
        16 May 2023 05: 13
        I was in Belarus on 06-09.05.2023 with my grandchildren - they are delighted!
        In response, our strategic nuclear forces will fly. And your polonizers with zmagars will simply clean up the Russian-speaking population if you cave in.
  4. +1
    15 May 2023 19: 33
    Well, in the end, my "Point" wherever I want, I drag it there. That is, the dad stopped playing on all the boards and "voiced" his decision. And what will come of it, only time will tell.
    1. +2
      15 May 2023 19: 56
      That will come out, as in September 1939.
      Since they decided to start a war because of a puddle, they will. And there is only one way out - to work ahead of the curve and prevent a limited nuclear one in Europe.
      1. +2
        15 May 2023 20: 44
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        work ahead of the curve and prevent a limited nuclear attack in Europe.

        If I understand you correctly, are you proposing to apply a preemptive RIA across the States? Well, as an alternative to a "limited nuclear war on the ETVD"? And nothing bothers you? No? Or you no longer take England and France with their nuclear weapons into account ... But in vain. They are just in EUROPE and are located ... So - it does not count!
        If it comes to the Hamburg account, then no one will find it. Therefore, fight for peace, strengthen the power of Russia!
        AHA.
        1. 0
          16 May 2023 05: 03
          If I understand you correctly, are you proposing to apply a preemptive RIA across the States?

          Got it wrong.
          A limited nuclear nuclear war in Europe (with the possible maximum use of the potential of Great Britain and France) - the development of the 80s of the last century, with a constant upgrade.
          The goal is the maximum (over 90%) of our strategic nuclear forces. At the same time, the US strategic nuclear forces remain practically untouched. However, in a full-fledged nuclear conflict, their SSBNs and strategic bombers with tankers will also mostly survive.
          Therefore, in Ukraine (bridges, dams, turbine halls) it is necessary to hit from the ocean (preferably from two), having previously deployed the maximum possible composition of strategic nuclear forces. Without any warnings, contrary to all treaties. Then the States - they won’t twitch - they will want to live, and a limited nuclear war will lose its meaning.
      2. -1
        15 May 2023 21: 15
        work ahead of the curve and prevent a limited nuclear attack in Europe.

        How so?
        1. +2
          16 May 2023 05: 06
          Before tactical nuclear weapons are deployed in Poland, Finland and the Baltic states.
      3. +2
        15 May 2023 22: 05
        Quote: Victor Leningradets
        And there is only one way out - to work ahead of the curve and prevent a limited nuclear one in Europe.

        There is another way out - not to send troops first, so as not to start local non-nuclear conflicts, but to bristle with nuclear missiles and let everyone know that any entry into Russian territory will lead to their launch. There are no suicides.
        Help the allies with aviation, special squads and supplies, but not direct intervention.
        1. +1
          16 May 2023 02: 05
          Quote: Plate
          There is another way out - not to send troops first, so as not to start local non-nuclear conflicts, but to bristle with nuclear missiles and let everyone know that any entry into Russian territory will lead to their launch.

          Late.
          Today there is no "do not enter" task,
          there is no task to "prevent entry" either,
          today the task is "to expel from its territory."

          PS About the voiced goals of the NWO, those who have voiced have been silent for a long time.
          1. 0
            16 May 2023 21: 43
            Alas, it's really too late. But in general, to roll out somehow from Ukraine, since we can’t win, after ourselves to leave one continuous devastation throughout the country, the restoration of which will take 20 years, and sit at your nuclear arsenal and not blow your mustache.
            Do the states need a war in Europe? I agree it's needed. But this means that we must prevent war. And so far, it's not working out well for us.
        2. +2
          16 May 2023 05: 24
          How
          do not send troops first
          can stop the aggressor? Their goal is the capture of Belarus, the actual repetition of June 1941. And then - Smolensk - Moscow!
          but to bristle with nuclear missiles themselves and let everyone know that any entry into the territory of Russia will lead to their launch
          are those burgundy red lines? Until it is indicatively used for real purposes, they will not believe it.
          There are no suicides

          This is in the USA. And the Europeans and you and I are collateral losses for the Americans.
          1. 0
            16 May 2023 21: 40
            Quote: Victor Leningradets
            can stop the aggressor?

            Easily. If there is a clear understanding that this will lead to a thermonuclear apocalypse, the aggressor will not attack us. Look, how many States did not cock on the DPRK with its miniature arsenal of several warheads, but did not go for it. And with Russian capabilities and with the START actually canceled ...
            And why do they need Belarus, Smolensk, Moscow?
            Quote: Victor Leningradets
            Until it is indicatively used for real purposes, they will not believe it.

            Throughout the Cold War and all the time until the beginning of the NWO, the whole world was shaking at the very idea of ​​a NATO-Russia conflict, because there are large nuclear arsenals on both sides. And no one twitched at us until we ourselves twitched. And no one is twitching at the States either, including because of the nuclear arsenal. And at the same time, nuclear weapons have not been used since WWII.
            Quote: Victor Leningradets
            This is in the USA. And the Europeans and you and I are collateral losses for the Americans.

            Fortunately, a war with a NATO country is an automatic war with the United States, and therefore you can send warheads right there.
  5. +3
    15 May 2023 19: 46
    stinks of war for the last 10 years

    ps zadolbali with the size
  6. -4
    15 May 2023 19: 49
    Given the accuracy of this thing, only a nuclear warhead would do the trick, chemical weapons are prohibited.
    In short, unusable, except perhaps for suicide.
    1. -1
      15 May 2023 20: 01
      chemical weapons are prohibited

      Stop, what prohibitions before the "Final comment"!
      Everything will go to work, as long as it is at hand. The main thing is a clear choice of purpose. After a strike from the ocean - to finish off an immobilized, but with the potential to resist the enemy. And remember that the main goal is not yet touched!
    2. +6
      15 May 2023 20: 23
      Quote from: zorglub bulgroz
      In short, unusable, except perhaps for suicide.

      On firing somewhere in Saudi Arabia, in the first half of the 90s, Point U hit a barrel 60 km away.
      1. 0
        15 May 2023 20: 37
        The Ukrainian enemy has the same ... not convinced of their effectiveness from the West, except to make holes in the sidewalks
    3. +3
      15 May 2023 21: 55
      Quote from: zorglub bulgroz
      Given the accuracy of this thing, only a nuclear warhead would do the trick, chemical weapons are prohibited.
      In short, unusable, except perhaps for suicide.

      Chemical weapons are prohibited only to those who comply with the prohibitions and who have their own sound internal prohibitions on actions.
  7. 0
    15 May 2023 19: 49
    The Belarusian military pulled Tochka missile systems to the Polish border
    . It's not very calm...
  8. +3
    15 May 2023 19: 58
    It's time for us to move the Iskanders closer to the Finns.
  9. -1
    15 May 2023 20: 22
    The point is good about equipping special warheads.
  10. 0
    15 May 2023 20: 40
    I hope that everything is tightened up with a special warhead?))
  11. -1
    15 May 2023 21: 40

    Bots guards and instigated the use of nuclear weapons, don't burn yourself so openly.
  12. 0
    16 May 2023 00: 57
    Quote: Gnefredov
    We (MSK, Sverdlovsk district) read differently:

    If the first time they hit
    You answer with a punch in the eye
    If that doesn't help
    Hands to feet and afterburner!



    where are you broadcasting from?
  13. -1
    16 May 2023 01: 58
    Meanwhile, Poland received the first HIMARS (from the American contract for almost 500 launchers). They will be handed over to the 1st artillery brigade of the 16th mechanized division stationed in the north-east of the country. "Its mission will be to contain the aggressor on NATO's eastern flank," the Polish minister said.
  14. 0
    16 May 2023 13: 17
    I think the leadership of Belarus is much smarter and less delusional, overall, than the Russian leaders have shown themselves to be during the last 15-20 years.