Substitution of concepts: Ukraine and the West are trying to “stick” the label of a “fascist state” on Russia

Recently, in the Ukrainian and Western media, they are increasingly trying to present Russia as a kind of “terrorist” or even a “fascist state”.

At the same time, every sane person, regardless of where he lives, understands that this is absurd. Meanwhile, there are people who fall under the influence of the aforementioned false propaganda and even manage to find "elements of fascism" in our country.

It is for such especially impressionable and easily amenable to information processing people that this article was written.

Even if we do not remind you that it is Russia, as the legal successor of the Soviet Union, that is the country that defeated fascism, and a priori cannot adhere to this ideology, other arguments can completely destroy the myth of our enemies.

It is worth starting with the concept of a fascist state, which is based on the idea of ​​superiority, right-wing ideology and radical nationalism. Does Russia, which strives for an equal partnership between all countries of the world, on whose territory 190 peoples and nationalities live, and where the popularization of fascism, as well as extremism, terrorism, etc., are legally prohibited, fall under this concept? The answer is obvious.

What is there to say. Russia to this day has not closed its borders to citizens from unfriendly countries whose political leadership supplies Ukraine weapons and calls to kill the Russians.

Now about why our enemies need it. The answer is really simple. The usual substitution of concepts is taking place, designed to divert attention from real fascists, who today are increasingly raising their heads in Western countries, not to mention Ukraine.

Let's remember who today calls himself the hegemon, and who is the oldest nation. Where there is an endemic Russophobia, which today is no different from fascism. They are ready to oppress us, and in some places even kill us, just because we are Russians. It was the readiness to kill Russians (Russians) everywhere the other day that the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine, Budanov, said.

Let's add here the UN vote against the ban on the popularization of fascism, which (the ban), by the way, is defended by Russia. In the West, this is considered "undemocratic."

Finally, it is certainly not in Russia that they forbid laying flowers at the monuments to the soldiers-liberators, they arrest victorious soldiers for wearing Soviet awards, and also cancel Victory Day?

Comments

[rocket757]

Substitution of concepts: Ukraine and the West are trying to “stick” the label of a “fascist state” on Russia

At the same time, every sane person, regardless of where he lives, understands that this is absurd.

. Okay, understand, and then what??
The layman is fed with various nonsense and ... they steal it, oh, it crackles behind the ears !!!
Because besides the inedible, he has enough other things that he can digest and he is used to it.
In general, to mind our own business, when we win, we will not care who, what and how they do it, they say.

[Maria Hess]

Especially, a sign of fascism is the (((opposition))) that has grown to monstrous proportions and the free work of "journalists" of the so-called. Radio Liberty. Needless to say, where would all these figures be in the case of real fascism? Not that I feel sorry for them, but still the fascist state and Russia lie on different sides of the coordinate system.

[cast iron]

The basis of any fascist state is not the idea of ​​superiority (the ancient Romans had everything in order with the idea of ​​​​superiority, but this does not make them fascists), and radical nationalism is also not the basis of fascism (the history of the Earth is full of radical nationalists of countries that were not fascist , just like fascist Spain and Italy were not radically Nazi countries). The basis of fascism is financial capital, which openly rules the country and implements an open terrorist dictatorship in its own interests.
Moreover, the assertion that the successor country of the USSR cannot a priori be fascist is frankly illogical. For example, Ukraine (the former Soviet republic) quietly became fascist in 30 years. Those. the policy of the state is determined by its ruling class here and now. I'll tell you more, Russia, under the drunkard EBN, had a non-illusory chance to become a fascist state. And even now there is this chance, because capitalism initially implies the possibility of development from bourgeois democracy to fascism.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: cast iron

For example, Ukraine (the former Soviet republic) quietly became fascist in 30 years.

let's be careful with the terms, after all, not a fascist, but a Nazi state

[Jcvai]

Not a question, you can sort out the signs of fascism point by point:
- a dictatorial regime with tight control over society and the economy - yes
- radical racism - yes
- anti-communism - available
What's the total?..

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: JcVai

What's the total?..

in sum - Nazism and fascism are not the same thing

[Jcvai]

Everything rests on the definition. I'm starting from the publicly published ones.
I argue accordingly.
If you have your own definition, it will be a meaningless argument without specifics until you give your definitions or, at least, specify the applied signs in which there are discrepancies.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: JcVai

Everything rests on the definition. I'm starting from the publicly published ones.
I argue accordingly.

sorry, but radical racism has never been a sign of fascism, as well as anti-communism, these are already notions
so for reference, the Duce was a fan of Lenin

[Jcvai]

Is it?!
Here's to you from the Russian Academy of Sciences about fascism:
- this is an ideology and practice that affirms the superiority and exclusivity of a certain nation or race and is aimed at inciting national intolerance, justifying discrimination against representatives of other peoples!..

You, of course, judging by the last comment, can refer to the separately singled out "Italian fascism", but you forget the official Italian doctrine of the 30s of white supremacy against blacks.
And if we consider German fascism, then anti-communism is one of the key features there.

[Foul skeptic]

so for reference, the Duce was a fan of Lenin

1) And?
2) Did you glue posters with Ilyich on the walls?

[cast iron]

No, it's not true. These items are optional. Not all dictatorial countries are fascist. For example Libya Gaddafi or Hussein's Iraq were not fascist. Racism is also optional. Lots of examples. Anti-communism? Well then, all capitalist countries are fascist, because the bourgeois do not like communists at all. Read Dimitrov's definition. Everything is clear there.

[cast iron]

Let's see what is Ukraine? 1) Does big financial capital rule Ukraine through its media puppets? How to lead! Another thing is that the financial capital of Ukraine is suppressed by the capital of the United States, which has been dictating orders to them lately. Such fascism is obtained for export. The US is not the first. They know how to do it.
2) Is the financial capital of Ukraine radicalized and chauvinistic? Definitely yes! They kill a thousand people - like two fingers!
3) Is the management of Ukrainian financial capital an open dictate? Definitely! No other point of view in the media. Anyone who has a different point of view is killed or imprisoned without any fuss. People are caught by the thousands and sent to war for slaughter. People in Odessa were exponentially burned - open terror in the government of the country.
These are the main and obligatory features of fascism.

[old]

In the concentration camps and death camps created by the German fascists, about 3,5 million people (mostly Soviet citizens).
Of them:
Buchenwald claimed the lives of 56 people.
"Belzec" - from 450 to 000 people (in 600 months !!!).
"Bergen-Belsen" - 70 people.
"Bogdanovka" - 160 people (for 000 months, of which 3 in one week !!!).
"Darnitsa" - 68 people.
Dachau - 41 people.
"Majdanek" - 78 people.
"Small Trostinets" - 200 people.
"Sobibor" - 250 people.
"Theresienstadt" - 33 people.
"Treblinka" - 800 people.
"Auschwitz" - 1 people.

They would have destroyed an entire race without blinking, together with the small peoples of the USSR, if not for the Soviet Army.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: old

In created by the German fascists

There were fascists in Italy, there were Nazis in Germany

[zenion]

And fascist-Nazis are too tough for you? You will remind New Year's greetings - In the glade sered makiv, the lad became a diva with cancer. Cancer sideways and pidskokom, congratulations on New Rock.

[cast iron]

Stop writing illiterate nonsense. Read Dimitrov's scientific definition of fascism. This is the most complete, reflecting the essence of the phenomenon, division.

[Foul skeptic]

Read Dimitrov's scientific definition of fascism.

Why "scientific"? By what criteria?
Why is this his definition? And not the XIII Plenum of the Executive Committee of the Communist International?

[cast iron]

Do you even know that the definition of fascism by Dimitrov and the 8th plenum of the Executive Committee of the Comintern are one and the same? Scientific, because this phenomenon was given a complete definition with MANDATORY characteristic features. And these features are necessarily present in all types of fascism: in Italian, Spanish, German.

[Foul skeptic]

Do you even know that the definition of fascism by Dimitrov and the 8th plenum of the Executive Committee of the Comintern are one and the same?

I'm aware of what to talk about

Quote: cast iron

scientific definition of fascism Dimitrov

it

Quote: cast iron

write illiterate nonsense

Since Dimitrov did not "give definitions", but repeated TWO YEARS LATER (1935) the theses adopted by the Presidium of the ECCI (1933). What he himself, in the so-called "definition" said:

Quote: Dimitrov

Fascism is in power, comrades, how correctly it was described by the XNUMXth plenum of the Executive Committee of the Communist International, an open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, most imperialist elements of finance capital.

And here is the definition from Dimitrov

Quote: Dimitrov

But no matter what masks fascism puts on, no matter what forms it takes, no matter what ways it comes to power,

fascism is the most ferocious attack of capital on the working masses;

fascism is unbridled chauvinism and war of conquest;

fascism is a frenzied reaction and counter-revolution;

Fascism is the worst enemy of the working class and all working people!

A very "scientific" definition. True - yes. Scientific - no.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: cast iron

in all types of fascism: in Italian, Spanish, German.

sure, but send me examples of racial theory in italy, spain, argentina or greece
Nazism was not only in Germany, as well as fascism not only in Italy, but to say that this is the same thing is the height of stupidity

[Foul skeptic]

sure, but send me examples of racial theory in italy, spain, argentina or greece

Considering that Lombroso, infamous for his theory, which the Germans adopted for the very practice of "measuring skulls", and also wrote the book "The White Man and the Colored Man", was Italian, then your requests look even comical. And in Italy there were such citizens as Alfredo Niceforo and Rudolph Livi. Each with their own racial theory. And in Italy, under Mussolini, the "scientific" journal "La Difesa della Razza" ("Protection of the Race") was published, laws were passed banning "madamato" (mixed marriages with Africans), since 1910 there was a political party ANI (Italian Nationalist organization), which became part of the PNF (National Fascist Party). Its founder, Enrico Corradini, used the term "National Socialism" to describe his ideology. In the 1920s, the Italian fascists accused the Croats and Slovenes of a "Masonic Jewish conspiracy". Mussolini spoke more than once about the need for the total destruction of the Slovenes (which was realized in Italian concentration camps during the war). Well, the icing on the cake is the racial manifesto "Manifesto della razza".
And so no, no racism and racial theories

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: cast iron

Stop writing stupid nonsense

you write nonsense, fascism and Nazism are two different things, just like Bolsheviks and anarchists
it’s just that under the Union, the ideology of the Third Reich was identified with the ITALIAN ideology of fascism for one simple reason - in the Reich there was an ideology of national SOCIALISM, which from the point of view of our ideologists was unacceptable

[Foul skeptic]

the ideology of the Third Reich was identified with the ITALIAN ideology of fascism for one simple reason

namely, because it had everything present in Italian fascism with its "national" characteristics. Like Croatia, Hungary, Bulgaria, etc. If something looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it is most likely a duck.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

do not write nonsense if beets are used in a herring under a fur coat, this does not mean that you eat borscht

[Foul skeptic]

if beets are used in a herring under a fur coat, this does not mean that you eat borscht

Of course it doesn't. After all, you have distorted the essence of the above metaphor, replacing the identity on a SERIES of signs ... not the identity on ONE sign. But if something looks like borscht, smells like borscht, tastes like borscht, then it is most likely borscht. Well, since you are closer to culinary rather than ornithological examples.
PS If you saw the "bias" of "our ideologists", then, for example, the British in their Britannica, describing fascist parties and countries with fascist regimes, also followed our lead, calling Germany fascist?

https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism

PPS Germany was not alone in its attempt to cover up fascism with "socialism", it's convenient for working with the "plebs". In the same France, the fascists were renamed Parti Social Français, and in South Africa - the National Democratic Party.
PPS If you want to stop being unfounded, I recommend for review the work of Davis and Lynch "The Routledge companion to fascism and the far right"

[cast iron]

You write nonsense, because trying to prove that Nazi Germany was not fascist.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: cast iron

that Hitler's Germany was not fascist.

apparently you are sure that the eSeRs and the Bolsheviks are one and the same

[cast iron]

Apparently, you are a big admirer of fascist Germany, since you don’t want to admit point-blank that it was fascist.

[napalm]

Quote: old

In the concentration camps and death camps created by the German fascists, about 3,5 million people (mostly Soviet citizens).
Of them:
Buchenwald claimed the lives of 56 people.
"Belzec" - from 450 to 000 people (in 600 months !!!).
"Bergen-Belsen" - 70 people.
"Bogdanovka" - 160 people (for 000 months, of which 3 in one week !!!).
"Darnitsa" - 68 people.
Dachau - 41 people.
"Majdanek" - 78 people.
"Small Trostinets" - 200 people.
"Sobibor" - 250 people.
"Theresienstadt" - 33 people.
"Treblinka" - 800 people.
"Auschwitz" - 1 people.

They would have destroyed an entire race without blinking, together with the small peoples of the USSR, if not for the Soviet Army.

Where are the Jews then? In concentration camps from all over Europe. Basically they should have been. Explain.

[Ezekiel 25-17]

An explosion of diplomatic relations is inevitable. Their Embassies must leave Russia, preferably via the North Pole.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Even if we do not remind you that it is Russia, as the legal successor of the Soviet Union, that is the country that defeated fascism, and a priori cannot adhere to this ideology, other arguments can completely destroy the myth of our enemies.

God forbid such a lawyer, the arguments are not just farfetched, they are fitted on kicks

[paul3390]

If we had any form of a tough, cohesive state sharpened to win, led by a real tough leader, we would have already fought on the approaches to the English Channel .. And everyone who has not yet fallen under the long-deserved distribution - quietly wrote under the shkonka from horror .

But we have an extremely liberal state headed by no type of leader. Because everything happens the way it happens. And labeling fascism, totalitarianism and other isms on THIS is simply ridiculous. We have one ideology - a wallet, and everything is subordinate to it. In addition, as always, due to illiteracy, fascism and Nazism are confused. But these are, whatever one may say, quite different constructions .. Nazism in a country with a hundred nationalities is impossible in principle, but fascism ... Well - if everything goes on like nothing, I personally won’t be surprised at anything .. For human patience still has borders, and where they will wind when the patience finally bursts - who knows ..

[Stas157]

Russia, like successor of the Soviet Union

Lately, this thought has come up a lot. And it concerns more and more spiritual things. What can not but rejoice!
But is it possible to adopt even more from the USSR? Socio-economic formation, for example. And the type of industrial relations?

In order for the successor, so to speak, to take full advantage of the rich inheritance!

[paul3390]

But is it possible to adopt even more from the USSR?

Can't you just return it?

[cast iron]

Putin said that those who want to return the USSR are without brains.

[Santa Fe]

There can be no comparisons here.

If fascist Germany was like Russia, then the blitzkrieg would end in Poland at 39m. The plundered and demoralized Wehrmacht stood still and stormed some Krakow for a whole year

[zenion]

So the German Nazi-fascist country was not created for them to fall asleep in Poland. They even united countries with high technology and gave these countries to help the Germans to ruin the USSR. In addition, with the help of the Nazis, these countries were supposed to be cleansed of Jews. But the United States pretended that this was not the case. After all, in this way it was possible to reach them. But, when the united Europe failed to complete the task, the United States immediately went over to the side of the USSR in order to return the money spent. While Stalin was in the leadership, they only scratched all the places, but when the leader was gone, the USSR was gone. How can this country, that is, the traitors of the USSR, suddenly, for no reason, become winners in World War II, if it turned out that they killed the winners and the people who won?

[Bingo]

Well, the quote that is mistakenly attributed to Churchill, actually said by a pastor from Cincinnati in 1936 - "fascism will come to the USA, but under a new name" ... Well, the new fascists will call themselves anti-fascists ... So they call them. only that pastor was deeply mistaken that he would "come" to the USA - he never left there

[Santa Fe]

in the USA - he never left there

And how is fascism and the United States. What are the signs

This is the story of a discharge - I don't like someone, so I'll call him a fascist, a bad word

With regards to the given topic of fascism, the author, proving his case, decided not to mention the "14 signs of fascism" by Umberto Eco. Stay as far away from that canonical list as possible. Because when applied to the current situation, everything will become somehow too ambiguous.

[Foul skeptic]

Keep off that canon list

"Canonical"? Why would suddenly?

And how is fascism and the United States. What are the signs

Populism, elitism (American-style democracy is the highest form of social development, other forms are lower), missionary work (bearer and defender of democracy throughout the world), corporatism, state intervention in the sphere of "family, sex, gender." The list can be long.
In general, it is not clear how, in relation to the capitalist country, in the conditions of tougher competition between the capitalist countries, there can be surprise about its fascism. Everyone will drink from this cup.

[Jcvai]

Why so?
1. The cult of traditions: any dissent is considered a betrayal - everything connected with the Russian Federation is considered hostile - there is.
2. Rejection of modernism: the "correct" origin is more important than scientific and technogenic development, freedom of speech, freedom of personal choice - you can not mention the chosenness of the nation, it is promoted all over the world.
3. The cult of action, for the sake of action: why think, if you can jump - in the general mass there is.
4. Complete rejection of critical thinking: any attempts to comprehend what is happening outside the framework of "eternal values", disputes, etc. destroy the system, and therefore are prohibited and declared a betrayal - this is unmeasured.
5. Disagreement - a dividing sign: disagreement with the collective opinion and desires, dissent, heterogeneity, a different language - betrayal, those who disagree are subject to destruction - not clearly expressed, because there are no mass public physical eliminations, but by "soft" power / state skating rink and imperceptibly - quite to yourself .
6. The basic core of the ideology - disappointment, resentment, "unfair" defeats, economic and political crisis - oh yes, from Iraqi and Syrian "why is our oil lying under their sand" and ending with the current banking crisis, in which the Russians and Chinese
7. Pledge of privileges - the right birth in the right country (blood and soil theory / nationalism) - available
8. The general feeling of insult and vulnerability that the enemies live better, richer, more stable, have more resources, there are no objective criteria for evaluating a hostile rival - again, in terms of resources, it was higher
9. The fight against the enemy is not for life, but for the sake of struggle, pacifism is tantamount to betrayal and must be destroyed, the enemy cannot be spared even in thoughts, he is, by definition, a stranger, and strangers do not have the right to life - obviously
10. The dominance of populist elitism (appeals to the broad masses with promises of a quick and easy solution to acute social problems with the concept of the naturalness and positivity of education in society of elite strata/classes): the nation is declared chosen, the best, but to achieve happiness, you need to be in a party/public education / group / being tied by a common cause and common blood, a stranger is best suited, for example, the blood of an enemy is also obvious
11. The cult of heroism dominates, closely connected with the cult of death: anyone born in the "correct" nation is a hero. Those. an extraordinary and special creature, with a special fate - repeatedly present in other ways
12. The desire for power is tightly tied to the sexual sphere: the cult of masculinity flourishes, women fade into the background, the attitude towards them is dismissive and exploitative - this is debatable, because at the time of the creation of the "14 Signs" about the dominance of LGBT+tp+bp+etp even could not imagine, but even so you can "pull up"
13. The management of society is based on the principles of high-quality populism: the government is elected by majority (quantity) voting, the leader represents the interests of the people, the personal rights and freedoms of an individual are leveled, the people are a monolithic unity that is called to action, but has no power over it - wow this is a classic for sure
14. Newspeak: simplifying the language to limit the set of intellectual tools needed for critical thinking or replacing a more developed language with an underdeveloped one - this is a moot point, although if we take that the communication of the modern generation is switching to emoticons instead of text ...

So, if you wish, you can pull up the Yusovites on this list. Although they will not have everything as pronounced as that of the "protoukres"

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: JcVai

So, if you wish, you can pull up the Yusovites on this list. Although they will not have everything as pronounced as that of the "protoukres"

the problem is that almost ANY country can be pulled up to these signs

[Bingo]

Quote: Santa Fe

What are the signs

1) Nationalism. US citizens have rights, everyone else has only duties. For example, the complete exclusion of international treaties, the same on human rights - they haven’t even signed half, therefore they don’t plan to comply in principle, all rights are only in the United States.
2) Rigid dictatorship. And the "world gendarme" is the official US foreign policy, "peace through strength"
3) The power of corporations that elect the president and parliament - the so-called lobby
______________

Fascism (Italian fascismo from fascio - bundle, bunch, association) is a political ideology of a dictatorial type, representing the state as the highest value, and the people (nation) as a united corporation of people, the idea of ​​the so-called. corporate state.

[cast iron]

He has a list of features that are inherent in a huge number of states. However, they were never fascist. Dimitrov or at the 8th plenum of the Comintern has a complete and sufficient definition. Without any water

[Santa Fe]

Dimitrov or at the 8th plenum of the Comintern has a complete and sufficient definition. Without any water

I agree with you

There are a number of clear features and signs of fascism, from different authors. Umberto Eco gained fame, he has a lot of water, but you can highlight the grains of meaning

On the right, in my personal opinion, the clearest definitions. And one more circumstance, without which fascism, in principle, could not be fascism - this is the presence of Mussolini or a mustachioed, etc., to choose from

Everyone who bashfully tries not to talk about these signs, instead embarking on lengthy arguments and searches for fascism in modern Western countries, they are all cowardly afraid to face the truth

[Foul skeptic]

On the right, in my personal opinion, the clearest definitions.

The funny thing is that "on the right" is a remake of our "oppositionists", who are an apple from an apple tree, to the nuances of Russia, as can be seen from points 1 and 9, which sound differently in the original. Some other points have also been reformulated to look "tougher" than they were in the original. For example, 14.

instead, embarking on lengthy discussions and searches for fascism in modern Western countries, they are all cowardly afraid to face the truth

And even more funny, Lawrence Britt, wrote his 14 points, alluding to the United States

Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not.

After this article of his with 14 points, by the way, he published a fiction book "June, 2004" about the United States that has fallen into fascism.
PS I didn’t even begin to analyze the “scientific” nature of the “comparative analysis” (absent in the publication) of an article from a person who does not publish in scientific publications, does not have a specialized education, the author of articles titled “Forward, (evangelical) soldiers of Christ!”, “ Islamofascism – it’s wrong to say so”, “Space, time and God”, etc.

[Illanatol]

The lists are incomplete, some items are simply wrong. Especially delivers "neglect to the sciences and arts." Alas, the fascists/Nazis paid close attention to science and art (as they understood it).
And Mussolini did not even spend the night in any patriotism either in the Reich or in Italy. The then leaders pursued an anti-patriotic policy, considering their nations only as instruments for achieving personal and narrow group goals.
Fascism (Nazism) is the most open and harsh form of the dictatorship of the ruling elite (big capital, if you like). But big capital, like the proletariat according to Marx, does not have a fatherland. There is only a controlled territory (two-legged cattle is attached) as an object of resource exploitation.

[napalm]

Quote: Santa Fe

in the USA - he never left there

And how is fascism and the United States. What are the signs

This is the story of a discharge - I don't like someone, so I'll call him a fascist, a bad word

With regards to the given topic of fascism, the author, proving his case, decided not to mention the "14 signs of fascism" by Umberto Eco. Stay as far away from that canonical list as possible. Because when applied to the current situation, everything will become somehow too ambiguous.

One such group is the Aryan Brotherhood. It is the largest white racist criminal organization in the United States, with at least 15 members. Most of them are in prisons. Members of the Aryan Brotherhood (aka AB, 000, SS) commit at least 666 percent of homicides in federal prisons, according to the FBI. This is a huge number considering that the "Aryans" account for less than 20 percent of the total prison population in the United States.

[zenion]

Ukraine and Zapadnyuks want to say that they and Russia consider the same as they are. But there is a slightly bigger difference in the scores. In Vkrajina, 2,5 million Jews were killed without thinking. In order to achieve such indicators in occupied Russia, it would be necessary to kill Jews for a hundred years to compare. And if you add the number of Jews killed in Zapadnyuk together with Hitler, then this thousand years. For the reason that in the unoccupied part of the USSR there was Soviet power. It is not surprising that before the war against Hitler and after the war against Hitler, Stalin said that in these difficult times he could trust only the Jews.

[Roust]

Come on, let them choke on the saliva of rabies, they still don't have much time left.

[Illanatol]

Quote: Santa Fe

And how is fascism and the United States. What are the signs

Yes, yes ... "It's impossible for us"
The first and most obvious sign of fascism: people are beginning to be divided into grades. There are full-fledged people who have rights, and there are people who are inferior, flawed (undersized), and the division is inherent at the innate, genetic level.
Here are 100% Americans - certainly full-fledged people, and all sorts of Slavs, Arabs, other Asians there - definitely not, and their life costs much less than the life of an Anglo-Saxon and even a European. So with these subhumans you can not stand on ceremony, you can starve or burn with napalm.
Such an attitude of the Yankees is regularly practically proved by their foreign policy, such views are quite clearly stated in the American mass cult: from cinematography to computer games and comics.
I must say that even in American films, sometimes they clearly show the proximity of the "Empire of Good" with the Third Reich. Like, for example, in the sci-fi movie "Iron Skies", in which the modern American elite strikes up a "chewing gum friendship" with the German Nazis who have found shelter on the moon. Both sides quickly came to a complete understanding due to the commonality of views ...

[napalm]

So with these subhumans you can not stand on ceremony, you can starve or burn with napalm.
Such an attitude of the Yankees is regularly practically proved by their foreign policy, such views are quite clearly stated in the American mass cult: from cinematography to computer games and comics. The movie Avatar shows.