The topic that we have covered today has been discussed by us for a long time. Already after the writing of the article, the “long-awaited” unexpectedly happened - the Kremlin’s attack with the help of drones. Life itself forced us to respond to this event.
Much is now being written and talked about whether this terrorist attack should be regarded as an assassination attempt on President Putin. This is the main question that is now facing the leadership of our country. The fact is that an attempt on the president's life, according to all international laws, is regarded as an attack on the country and, accordingly, as a declaration of war.
Theoretically, even with a successful hit on the roof of the Senate Palace, where the president’s office is really located, low-yield ammunition simply could not “finish off” the presidential office. But does it matter now? The very fact of the attack on the presidential residence is already the basis for retaliatory actions.
Whether the president was in place or was in some other place, as it was this time, is completely unimportant. I agree with the statement of Dmitry Medvedev, which he published yesterday (spelling preserved):
“After today’s terrorist attack, there were no options left except for the physical elimination of Zelensky and his cabal.
It is not even needed to sign the act of unconditional surrender.
Hitler, as you know, did not sign it either. There will always be some kind of changer like the Zitz President
Admiral Dönitz ... "
It is not even needed to sign the act of unconditional surrender.
Hitler, as you know, did not sign it either. There will always be some kind of changer like the Zitz President
Admiral Dönitz ... "
So, to consider the attack as a military operation is not worth it. This is precisely a terrorist attack or sabotage, the purpose of which lies more in the political, ideological, diplomatic and, to some extent, in the media plane. Such a terrorist attack cannot influence the course of the NWO.
Who carried out the attack?
One of the most important questions that needs to be answered is the question of who performed the operation? The Russian media are actively developing the topic of the Ukrainian UAV. To me, this version seems unlikely. Unlikely because the option of attacking the Kremlin has always, even in peacetime, been considered as probable. Consequently, the specialists were preparing for such an attack and were always on the alert.
The actions of the Zelensky team are very indicative in this regard. The head of the presidential office Andriy Yermak was especially distinguished by his desire to show his importance and awareness. A few hours before the attack, he suddenly published an image of a rocket on his Telegram channel. And immediately after the operation, he added three more stickers with the image of fire ... True, soon, probably, after the corresponding sticking from the SBU, these pictures were deleted. But the Internet remembers everything.
So who launched the drones anyway?
We will soon receive an answer to this question from the FSB. I will express my own opinion on this matter. More precisely, I will change the question itself. Did the SBU and the intelligence department really carry out this act of terrorism?
My answer will be... no.
Thoughts that the terrorist attacks, which have become more frequent in recent years, are being carried out by the very “sleeping DRGs” that Ukrainian intelligence leaders often stated about, appeared quite a long time ago. I have written about this many times. Ukraine perfectly used the situation with the accession of new regions to the Russian Federation, but the first “swallows” appeared back in 2014…
I think the performers should be sought among the citizens of Russia. And not only from those who received citizenship in recent years, but also from those who belonged or belong to the active part of the so-called anti-war movements and those who support the Kiev regime. Alas, we have such people. including experts in drones, which can easily convert a civilian UAV into a shock one.
The other question is more important. Did the Ukrainian authorities and specialists know about the preparation of the terrorist act?
Here the answer is definitely yes. The same situation with Yermak proves this. Moreover, I think that the operation itself was developed by intelligence, and the performers were just “hands”. By the way, the numerous arrests carried out by the FSB almost every day, perfectly confirm this.
Why does Kyiv need fireworks over the Kremlin?
I wrote above that the operation has no military value. What can not be said about the political, diplomatic, ideological and media effect. Let's try to understand this issue more scrupulously. And let's start with the political and diplomatic sphere.
The Zelensky regime is now under enormous pressure from the West. The situation in the US and the EU is tense. The people are beginning to think about where the funds allocated as aid to Kyiv go. No, the attitude towards Ukraine as the unfortunate victims of Russian aggression has not changed. It's just that for Western culture, money is the measure of success.
And this yardstick shows Western taxpayers that Kyiv has had little success in the past months. Against this background, the requirements to show the results of their investments look quite logical. But Zelensky does not have them! Counteroffensive? No real results yet. Only loud statements. The question to Zelensky was posed point-blank - either military successes, or it's time to end this mess, move on to negotiations.
But this contradicts numerous statements by Zelensky himself that negotiations will only take place after the victory over Russia. It is on these statements that the rating of Zelensky himself is kept. And then there are the statements of Russian politicians about the existing opportunity to start negotiations.
The terrorist attack practically stops talk of negotiations. It was not in vain that I cited Dmitry Medvedev's post at the beginning of the material. There are statements by other politicians about the same. Some of them take quite a radical position. It is doubtful that the same Medvedev, Duma Speaker Volodin and others will agree to such negotiations. But the president will decide.
In terms of media, the attack worked perfectly. The terrorist attack carried out on May 3, immediately after May Day and before the main Victory Day, has a very depressing effect on a certain part of the Russian population. Which, coupled with the ban on parades, the Immortal Regiment, and the public celebration of Victory Day in general, does not create a festive mood among people at all.
In turn, in Ukraine, on the contrary, another win. Well, they annoyed the Muscovites, nailed the vaunted FSB, scared the Russians. Forced Muscovites not to celebrate the victory of their ancestors! I think the topic will be accelerated until May 9 quite actively. Already, the Western media are cautiously publishing their forecasts about the presence of foreigners at the parade. They get scared and won't come!
Instead of conclusions
Should Russia hit control centers in Kyiv and other cities?
Today, politicians, the military, ordinary people are arguing about this. Opinions are radically different from each other. From "let's abide by the laws of war" to "destroy Bankovaya completely." It all depends on the emotionality of the person and the knowledge of the issue.
In my opinion, there is no need to destroy the Bank. What's the point of doing it? Destruction of Zelensky? I will quote Medvedev in a different vein - "There will always be some kind of changer like the Zitz-President Admiral Dönitz." Why do we need another Ukrainian martyr-fighter against the Russian invaders? What will we get from this positive?
It is quite another thing to strike at military command and control centers. For the same General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, for the SBU, for the GUR and other facilities. It is clear that there are no top officials there, but the very fact of the destruction of these facilities will show our capabilities and cool the heads of many Ukrainian radicals.
Well, the last.
Everything must be done to find the perpetrators of this terrorist attack. Not later, after some time, but now. Find and apply the law to the fullest. We have adopted changes to the laws that increase punishment for certain crimes. These laws must be enforced. And most importantly, the trials of such crimes should be widely covered in the press. Fear of punishment has a sobering effect on some...