Why Catherine II annexed Crimea

88
Why Catherine II annexed Crimea
Prince Potemkin accepts the abdication of the last Crimean Khan. painting by Boris Chorikov


Why did Russia need Crimea?


Firstly, the robbery, who lived by selling people into slavery, the Crimean Khanate, even in the XNUMXth century, during its decline and during the rise of the Russian Empire, retained its essence. Crimeans constantly raided Russian lands, took people away for sale into slavery.



In 1740–1768 the Crimean horde continued its raids on Russia. The slave trade was the basis of life, income of the Crimean Khanate. The scale of the raids was associated with the ability of the Russian army to guard the southern borders. So, during the Russian-Prussian war, taking advantage of the fact that the Russian troops were tied up on the western borders, the Crimeans made several major raids. Many thousands of people were taken to the Crimea.

Turkey, on the one hand, dissociated itself from the Crimean raids and even reported that the Russians could beat the Crimeans. On the other hand, the Porte began to threaten Russia when she tried to strengthen her southern borders and began to build fortresses on her own territory.

Also in St. Petersburg, they gradually realized that it was pointless to rely on the “Russian” party among the Crimean feudal lords. No matter how much you feed the wolf, he keeps looking into the forest. The only way to pacify Crimea is to make it Russian, with a Russian administration, cities, army and population. Part of the empire, and not a vassal territory, which at any moment can rebel or spill over to the side of the enemy.

Secondly, it is the military-strategic importance of the Crimean peninsula. It was a strategic foothold of the Ottoman Empire, aimed at Russia. In order to solve the main tasks of protecting the southern borders, to firmly gain a foothold in the Northern Black Sea region, on the shores of the Black (once Russian) Sea, it was necessary to occupy the Crimea. Also, it was here that it was possible to create a full-fledged base of the Russian fleet, the ports of the Sea of ​​Azov were not suitable for this.

Thirdly, this is the sacred meaning of the Crimea for Russian civilization. Crimea was part of the ancient Great Scythia, the direct successor of which is Rus'. Part of the peninsula was under the influence of the Russian state with its capital in Kyiv. The Russian Prince Vladimir was baptized in Korsun-Chersonese. This was followed by the baptism of Rus'. That is, the return of Russians to Crimea is natural, this historical part of Rus'-Russia.

Dolgorukov's campaign


During the Russian-Turkish war, the Russian army under the command of Prince Vasily Dolgorukov, with the support of the Azov flotilla, defeated the Crimean-Turkish forces in 1771 and overcame the Perekop line, took the Arabat fortress. The Crimean Khan Selim Giray fled to Turkey. The remaining Crimean troops settled in the Cafe, hoping for reinforcements from Porta. Kafa capitulated after a short resistance. The Turkish troops remaining on the peninsula were evacuated. The Russians occupied Kerch and Yenikale without a fight. Soon the Russians occupied the eastern and southern coasts of the peninsula.

The success of the Russian army was largely due to the quarrel in the ranks of the enemy. So, even before the start of Dolgorukov's campaign, the hordes that roamed in the Northern Black Sea region went over to the side of the Russians or remained neutral. Not without gold, transferred to the feudal lords, who joined the pro-Russian party. In the Crimea itself, after the flight of the khan, disorder began. Among the Crimean nobility and even the royal relatives, many began to consider themselves supporters of Russia. Therefore, the Crimean feudal lords signed a truce with Russia and left the vassal dependence on the Porte, deciding to independently elect a khan. Khan was elected Sahib Giray.

Dolgorukov demanded the release of Russians and Christian slaves in general. Many slaves themselves fled under the protection of the Russian army. In Cafe and other cities and villages, Greek churches began to be restored. It was planned to leave Russian garrisons in the Crimean cities. Naturally, these innovations were not to the liking of the Crimeans, who could not immediately abandon the age-old traditions of slavery and the “raid economy”. The pro-Turkish party has gained new supporters.

Türkiye was defeated in the war. On July 10 (21), 1774, peace was signed "in the camp near the village of Kyuchuk-Kainardzhi". The Crimean Khanate was recognized as independent. The most important fortresses - Kerch and Yenikale - retreated to Russia. The Russians received the right to keep the navy on the Black Sea.

Accession of Crimea


In general, it is clear that this was an interim treaty. The two great powers did not resolve the dispute over dominance in the Northern Black Sea region and the Black Sea. Russia did not secure Crimea, Constantinople dreamed of revenge. Russia received the right to keep a fleet at sea, but there was no main base. Azov and Taganrog were not suitable for the base of a large fleet.

The Crimean Khanate found itself in an intermediate, unstable position. Formally, the khanate was independent. But the Turkish Sultan was the head of all Muslims and claimed the Crimean Khan. The profile of the Sultan was minted on the Crimean money. Crimean nobility used to focus on Turkey. The Crimean economy was based on the slave trade and robbery. It pulled into the past. On the other hand, Russian garrisons remained on the peninsula. From St. Petersburg to the Crimea there were financial flows, which were mastered by local murzas.

The confrontation between the Russian and Turkish parties began. Sahib Giray was overthrown. In 1774, a Turkish landing was landed on the peninsula near Alushta with the new Khan Devlet Giray. Russian troops defeated the Turkish landing. But Devlet Giray stayed on the throne. In order to strengthen their positions on the peninsula, additional Russian troops were gathered there: in 1776, the corps of General Prozorovsky, including the Moscow division of Suvorov. When Prozorovsky fell ill, in 1777 the corps was headed by Suvorov.

Rumyantsev summoned Shagin-Girey, Devlet-Girey's brother, from Abkhazia. With the help of Russia, he became the Khan of the Kuban Tatars, proclaimed the independence of the Kuban horde from the Crimea. With the help of Russians and Nogays, Shahin occupied the Crimea and became a khan. He tried to modernize the khanate along the lines of Russia. But he met resistance from the nobility and the Muslim clergy. Again swept a wave of conspiracies, rebellions and uprisings.

As a result, Petersburg got tired of it. On April 14, 1783, the last Crimean khan Shakhin signed the abdication of the khan's throne, the foremen were sworn into Russian citizenship. On April 8 (19), 1783, Catherine II issued a manifesto in which she announced the inclusion of the Crimean Khanate, Taman and Kuban into the Russian Empire. The last Crimean Khan received a large pension.

Thus, Catherine the Great completed a great deed. The Tatar raids on Russia were finished, as well as the shameful slave trade on the peninsula. All slaves were freed. Russia received an important outpost, and construction of a base for the Black Sea Fleet began almost immediately. Potemkin made a lot of efforts to create a manufacturing economy on the peninsula. Crimean Tatars were forbidden to turn into serfs. They received the same rights as other inhabitants of the empire, but they had benefits - they were exempted from recruitment duty and from a number of other hardships. No one encroached on their faith, land and livestock. But many did not accept the new life and left for Turkey.

Türkiye was presented with a fait accompli. In Istanbul, they were amazed that the Russians were able to take the Crimea and Kuban so easily and bloodlessly. Khan himself abdicated the throne, the population swore allegiance to Catherine II. In 1784, the incorporation of Crimea into Russia was officially recognized in Constantinople. The vast Wild Steppe, which could fit the whole of France with several neighboring countries, freed from raids and robbery, quickly began to turn into a comfortable land. For ten years now, it has been a prosperous Novorossiysk province.


Manifesto of Catherine II "On the acceptance of the Crimean peninsula, the island of Taman and the entire Kuban side under the Russian state"
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    April 21 2023 05: 47
    Wise, after all, was Baba Ekaterina ..... ........
    1. +2
      April 21 2023 07: 53
      I have her Portrait on my phone .. I also like her grandson Pavel: he introduced a lot of reasonable things in Russia. I advise you to read more about Paul
      1. +3
        April 21 2023 09: 08
        Read about Alexander 3, Monomakh, Ivan 3 .... We had many worthy rulers.
        1. +4
          April 21 2023 19: 02
          I agree about Alexander 3. The man was smart.
          If you remember the princes, then you need to remember: Alexander Nevsky, Yaroslav the Wise
          1. +2
            April 22 2023 14: 11
            Vasily III (father of Ivan the Terrible) did a lot in terms of "gathering Russian lands" into a single state.
            Under Ivan the Terrible, there were many reforms. In particular: free primary education, a uniform uniform for the troops. During his reign, the population of Russia increased significantly (30-50%), the country's territory doubled.
      2. BAI
        +1
        April 21 2023 09: 40
        I understand that you have a name in honor of her?
        1. +3
          April 21 2023 12: 54
          They didn’t guess: there was a famous figure skater: Katharina Wit, and my mother really liked figure skating. She wanted me to be a figure skater, but I never skated. Didn't live up to my mother's expectations
      3. -1
        April 21 2023 10: 54
        Quote from lisikat2
        I advise you to read more about Paul

        Yeah. Introduced a ban on the word "snub-nosed". And then engaged in idiocy. Type Prussian orders in the army introduced. Remember Suvorov's expression: "Powder is not gunpowder, a scythe is not a cleaver, I am not a German, but a natural hare!" After all, Paul introduced reforms into the troops.
        1. +15
          April 21 2023 12: 07
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          And then engaged in idiocy

          Yes, in general, an utter tyrant!
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          Type Prussian orders in the army introduced.

          And after all, what the scoundrel thought up, demanded that the officers (only think!) Not eat hari in the villages, but serve in their regiments!
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          After all, Paul introduced reforms into the troops.

          Not only in the troops.
          Legislatively limited the corvee (to what extent this was carried out is another question), reduced the privileges of the nobility, prohibited the oppression of religious minorities ...
          crazy in one word... request
          1. +3
            April 21 2023 12: 58
            There would be more such fanatics .. Then Russia would be a prosperous country
      4. +3
        April 21 2023 12: 34
        I got a deuce for the lack of attention: Pavel. Pavel is the son of Catherine and stuck: "grandson"
        Hp I have extenuating circumstances: I'm at work, and here it is IMPOSSIBLE to be especially distracted
      5. 0
        April 21 2023 16: 55
        And what kind of "grandson Paul"? If Paul I, then he is a son, but grandchildren - Alexander Pavlovich and Nikolai Pavlovich (both numbered I) ruled the Empire for more than 50 years ..
  2. -7
    April 21 2023 05: 51
    Why Catherine II annexed Crimea

    And then!
    And then, that Catherine strengthened her power. Unlike Lenin, Gorbachev and Yeltsin. Therefore, she is "Great", and not "spotted creature" or "Alkash".
    1. +9
      April 21 2023 07: 45
      Quote: Amateur
      That's why she's "Great"

      fool Crap. She is Great, as she allowed the nobles not to serve. For this she was exalted. request Ivan the Terrible not only strengthened, but CREATED this state, so he was deleted from history. request So where is the truth?
      Our history was written by the German intruders for Catherine, the corrupt bastard of the professors with Karamzin, they rewrote it and added the exaltation of Catherine, and for infringing on the freedoms of the nobility they trampled Paul into the mud. request
      1. +9
        April 21 2023 09: 18
        allowed the nobles not to serve

        Exactly. Thus - putting the notorious mine under the Russian state. For since then, the people have ceased to understand why they are obliged to feed their type of elite, if it does not bring any benefit from now on ... And in 1917, everything exploded, because too many debts to the ruling class accumulated.
      2. +3
        April 21 2023 19: 14
        In fact, the story about Pavel is banal, he, a bully and a tyrant, challenged the Britons. Their intelligence, excellent intelligence, quickly found dissatisfied: Benegssen, Zubov, Palen and others.
        EVERY ruler will have dissatisfied
      3. 0
        April 25 2023 17: 53
        Mauritius. April 21, 2023. 07:45 - "... Our history was written by German intruders for Catherine, the corrupt bastard of the professors with Karamzin, they rewrote it and added the exaltation of Catherine ..."

        You're right and CORRECTLY indicated in the text. What "... this is the sacred meaning of Crimea for Russian civilization. Crimea was part of the ancient Great Scythia, the direct successor of which is Rus'. hi Part of the peninsula was under the influence of the Russian state with its capital in Kyiv. The Russian Prince Vladimir was baptized in Korsun-Chersonese. This was followed by the baptism of Rus'. That is, the return of Russians to Crimea is natural, this is a historical part of Rus'-Russia .... ".
        And then listening to that. What "... April 19, 2023 marks the 240th anniversary of the official acceptance of the Crimean Peninsula into the Russian Empire..." And he is only 240 years old in Russia(the right of the successor of Rus'. RI. USSR and RF). It's like in 1993 they celebrated the 2nd anniversary as a state and its army and navy. belay No. bully
        hi
      4. 0
        April 28 2023 17: 29
        History is not mathematics. History is a complex science and often a hundred years later we understand the ruler. Ask yourself a simple question. What would have happened if the Crimea had not been annexed by Katerina. There would still be Russia:: am
    2. +10
      April 21 2023 09: 14
      Unlike Lenin

      If it weren’t for Ilyich and the Bolsheviks, there would have been no Russia 100 years ago. And while this Union was - it was one of the two superpowers on the planet, so, for a second. And he wasn’t going to fall apart .. The Soviet Union is the peak of Russia’s power, it has never reached such heights in its entire history ..

      And you - put Lenin on a par with outright traitors and .... I would say more precisely - but the site does not give, replacing the necessary epithets ...
      1. +3
        April 21 2023 10: 07
        Quote: paul3390
        Yes - on the terms of the Union, but what - were there any other options? on that moment??

        You are absolutely right. It’s just that the idiots don’t know the history of the Motherland, thanks to the exam. What options could there possibly be? All the outskirts under the Provisional Government declared independence to varying degrees, the Baltic states, Ukraine, the Caucasus, Central Asia, request those. were states with varying degrees of recognition in the world. I recall the brilliant words: "To listen to you, this is how a gang of losers operated in the history of Russia." (Let's live until Monday) request Yes, a union of equal states.
        1. +10
          April 21 2023 11: 37
          Certainly. At that time, pro-Soviet forces won in almost all the outskirts. But - they had a condition. They-wanted at least some independence. For example - in the form of republics in the Union. And what was Ilyich supposed to do? Say no - and force a unitary state with bayonets? Were there enough bayonets? And was it worth it, with the civil war still not actually over, to start like the First Socialist War? How would the fighters and the people look at this? Yes, and - would such a broken-down country pull?

          Umnikov divorced - nowhere to spit. All the Bolsheviks are blamed .. But the question is for the one who discovered the type of mine - you have been wiping the throne with trousers for 23 years - why didn’t you exhaust the federal division? Why do we still not have a unitary state? Aaaah, can't you? Why do you think that Lenin-could? After all, he was not Khattabych ..
        2. -1
          April 22 2023 12: 20
          All outskirts under the Provisional Government declared independence
          Quite right, and Lenin gathered the outskirts, except for the most Russophobic - Poles and Chukhons. As he could, he organized it into the Union, other options were not rolled then. Of course, now we can talk. that the Stalinist plan for building the USSR is seen as preferable to Lenin's, but Joseph the Terrible himself managed to rally the country in that Leninist version. only after the weeding of the ranks of the Party had ceased did what we have now come out.
    3. +10
      April 21 2023 09: 55
      Yes, there is mainly the merit of Potemkin, then, as usual in our history of the slandered, some Potemkin villages are worth something
      1. +3
        April 21 2023 12: 58
        Quote: Ryaruav
        Yes, there is mainly the merit of Potemkin, then, as usual in our history of the slandered, some Potemkin villages are worth something

        Yes, the Romanovs are everything, but statesmen are nothing. request The generals are still held in high esteem, and the rest ..... recourse
    4. +1
      April 21 2023 22: 39
      And then, that Catherine strengthened her power. Unlike Lenin, Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
      And here you are easier! What did Lenin do? Saved as far as possible the Russian Empire! And what did Misha and Borey do? It's been ruined to the max!
    5. +1
      April 26 2023 18: 22
      Quote: Amateur
      That's why she's "Great"

      Because it canceled unnecessary laws and taxes. In Russian tradition, the "Great" is the ruler who cancels unnecessary laws. She also exempted the peasants who moved to Siberia from taxes. Otherwise, that region would be Chinese.
  3. +2
    April 21 2023 05: 57
    and not a single comment, unlike the meaningless slogans of cuckoos and nightingales, praising each other under the same uninformative news .. oh, how the public has changed from the once professional with interesting disputes ((
    1. +2
      April 21 2023 07: 58
      Go to another "Branch" and there will be interesting additions.
      It all depends on the author, his ability to select and submit material
    2. +1
      April 21 2023 08: 05
      Quote: dik-nsk
      and not a single comment, unlike the meaningless slogans of cuckoos and nightingales, praising each other under the same uninformative news .. oh, how the public has changed from the once professional with interesting disputes ((

      The community has changed a long time ago. It's been seven years now...
  4. +13
    April 21 2023 09: 09
    When we are told about the terrible type of guilt of the Russian people before the Crimean Tatars, for some reason no one wants to remember history .. How many millions of Russians were driven into slavery by them, what colossal material losses they caused us .. Yes, after this - let them bow at their feet, that they were not cut out at the root at all, as soon as such an opportunity arose! They didn’t spare a damn thing for us .. But the Russians - kind, as always - forgave everyone everything, even the blood of their ancestors .. And now we, before them, are also guilty ..

    As for the type of indigenous peoples, so sorry - the Russian Tmutarakan principality in those parts was tangible before the arrival of the Tatars there! And in general - if in good conscience, then of the living peoples, the Greeks have the most rights to the Crimea. Their colonies were there more than 2500 years ago .. When the Tatars were not heard of even in their native places .. So - who is the indigenous population there is another question ..
    1. +2
      April 21 2023 22: 49
      When we are told about the terrible type of guilt of the Russian people before the Crimean Tatars, for some reason no one wants to remember history.
      Yeah! We have guilt in the development and liberation of territories! Does the West have Merit or Mission?
      1. +3
        April 21 2023 23: 22
        Well, what are you! If you believe Kipling, then this is a burden, you see, beyond the strength of a white man in the West.
    2. 0
      April 22 2023 11: 04
      The first who are mentioned in Crimea are:
      Babin culture
      Rolled pottery culture
      18th century BC wassat
  5. +4
    April 21 2023 09: 12
    God, what idealism...
    They plowed Scythia, sacred meaning ....

    In fact, IMHO, everything is simple.
    The empire should expand, and Crimean rudeness is a small, weak state, simply inconveniently located for Russia at that time (like all emirates, principalities, etc.), Crimea is an unsinkable Battleship (an unsinkable aircraft carrier in modern terms), it also controls all trade and military in one way or another ports in the district, the times of feudalism with vassal bays and principalities ended, only whole large empires and kingdoms in Europe.

    The fate of the khanate and all the little things was a foregone conclusion.
    1. +8
      April 21 2023 10: 27
      Quote: Max1995
      The fate of the khanate and all the little things was a foregone conclusion.

      Look on the map of Europe and you will find a bunch of "every little thing" that shouldn't even be born into the white world. request But in history there is a cyclical process of consolidation and fragmentation of states. request Dozens of states were formed from the Roman Empire, from the empire of Charlemagne too, and even from the British one .... Well, we put our foot down after 1917 and after 1991 ....
      But thank God we are growing again, only clumsily, probably the vitamin of ideology is not enough in the body. request
      The Crimean Khanate, for a long time, sat near the Porte, but did not sit evenly, for which we trampled it. request
      So the fate of the khanate was not only decided long ago, but also realized, and we simply remade it for ourselves. Yes, and Taurida is not only Crimea, but also the Nogai horde, at the same time they cleaned it up ...
      1. -1
        April 21 2023 11: 05
        That yes
        But Port - lagged behind in development + butted with the environment + the Khanate from it across the sea, it is not convenient to "attach".
        And so - drive into the search "a list of lands attached to the Republic of Ingushetia under Catherine" and there are quite a lot of relatively small lands along the border that cannot compete in power with Russia, but before that they were relatively independent, or from Poland
        1. +7
          April 21 2023 11: 38
          The port was lagging behind ... The Crimean Khanate is small ... Poland is so-so ... And the Russian Empire, then, had to expand !!! But for some reason you just forget that it was from the "unfinished and underdeveloped" state formations that you listed and according to you that Russia was constantly threatened for centuries (!!!) and not small. And how are you about the "small, weak" Livonian Order forgot to say, I can't even put my mind to it ?! And the whole color of the British aristocracy in the Crimean War, "innocently" killed by our ancestors, was silent for some reason ...
          1. -4
            April 21 2023 12: 31
            Something you have incoherent and off topic came out
            1. +1
              April 21 2023 12: 37
              Read what you wrote yourself? You have this fact - "on topic"! )
        2. +4
          April 21 2023 13: 12
          Quote: Max1995
          But Porta - lagged behind in development + fought with the environment + Khanate from her across the sea, not convenient to "attach".

          Did you pass the logic on the exam with 5+? feel
          The empire should expand, and the Crimean boorishness is a small, weak state, simply inconveniently located for Russia at that time
          Russia was expanding and that's right, Porta was expanding and that's not right?
          Crimea is an unsinkable battleship, it also controls in one way or another all the commercial and military ports in the area,
          And we need Crimea, and the Porte vassal Crimea is a burden? recourse Where is the logic? Is it different? .. I would like to clarify feel
          But Porta - lagged behind in development
          How was the development of the Porte measured?
          1. 0
            April 21 2023 15: 38
            1) "do you see a gopher? no? but he is!" Here is similar.
            2) Porta has already passed its maximum. It hasn't expanded yet.
            And everyone has already begun to bite off a piece of it. First, from vassals and partners along the edges, and then from her, later.
            How many wars have there already been to Catherine 2? 6-7 like? and mostly bitten off.
            3) Vassal Crimea is still not your own Crimea. Yes, and they trade with Europe, the Turks are building a fleet in completely different places. And Russia is in the Crimea and nearby. The difference is obvious.
            4) For example, in the development of Science, Artillery and firearms in collisions. This manifested itself more strongly a little later, but even then, it seemed, it was noticeably manifested.
    2. +2
      April 21 2023 13: 04
      Quote: Max1995
      and Crimean rudeness is a small, weak state, simply inconveniently located for Russia at that time

      belay What did you drink? Weak, 300 years of robbery and the slave trade, and we could not do anything.
      1. -1
        April 21 2023 15: 23
        So, have you seen Crimea on the map? how is it sized?
      2. +1
        April 21 2023 22: 24
        Weak, 300 years of robbery and the slave trade, and we could not do anything.

        Yes, they couldn't. There were more priorities. The window to Europe was cut. Siberia was mastered. Then the hands reached the Crimea.
        1. -1
          April 22 2023 12: 18
          Exactly.
          Hands reached, and hello bear.
          And since it’s more medieval, the militia couldn’t do anything ....
    3. 0
      April 21 2023 22: 56
      How many US military bases are there in the world? Should the US empire expand? And what about England? Canada and Australia independent states?
      1. -2
        April 22 2023 12: 19
        You still cite a star empire as an example.
        Everything is written in the beginning
        "The empire must expand,..."
  6. BAI
    +2
    April 21 2023 09: 38
    1.
    Also in St. Petersburg, they gradually realized that it was pointless to rely on the “Russian” party among the Crimean feudal lords. No matter how much you feed the wolf, he keeps looking into the forest. The only way to pacify Crimea is to make it Russian, with a Russian administration, cities, army and population. Part of the empire, and not a vassal territory, which at any moment can rebel or spill over to the side of the enemy.

    The same can be said about Ukraine.
    2.
    Crimea was part of the ancient Great Scythia, the direct successor of which is Rus'. Part of the peninsula was under the influence of the Russian state with its capital in Kyiv. The Russian Prince Vladimir was baptized in Korsun-Chersonese. This was followed by the baptism of Rus'. That is, the return of Russians to Crimea is natural, this is a historical part of Rus'-Russia.

    It remains to argue with the proto-Ukrainians about the superiority in digging the Black Sea.
    1. 0
      April 21 2023 22: 59
      Crimea was part of the ancient Great Scythia, the direct successor of which is Rus'. Part of the peninsula was under the influence of the Russian state with its capital in Kyiv. The Russian Prince Vladimir was baptized in Korsun-Chersonese. This was followed by the baptism of Rus'. That is, the return of Russians to Crimea is natural, this is a historical part of Rus'-Russia
      And this is the main point! As Gorbachev said!
  7. +3
    April 21 2023 10: 43
    In Istanbul, they were amazed that the Russians were able to take the Crimea so easily and bloodlessly.
    Yes, what is there in Istanbul, in 2014 in Washington and London, after repeating this for a while, they even lost the power of speech. bully
  8. +4
    April 21 2023 11: 08
    What's the weird question in the title? What does why mean? Tell me at least one people on Earth who would not want to cut their own land from a neighbor. You yourself would not mind grabbing a couple of acres from a neighbor in a dacha. Better yet, self-capturing a fishing line or a clearing behind a fence. Which is like a draw.)))
    1. 0
      April 21 2023 23: 04
      What's the weird question in the title? What does why mean? Tell me at least one people on Earth who would not want to cut their own land from a neighbor.
      I suggest. England, USA! There was even a tiny Holland! Did Spain and Portugal smoke quietly? Did Germany and France spit on everything?
  9. -1
    April 21 2023 14: 46
    We live in an amazing time: under Catherine the Great, in the XNUMXth century, Crimea, the essence of the Wild Field, became Russian, and now we are forced to the lands watered with the blood of our soldiers into the bosom of Russia ...
    1. +3
      April 21 2023 23: 07
      We live in an amazing time: under Catherine the Great, in the XNUMXth century, Crimea, the essence of the Wild Field, became Russian, and now we are forced to the lands watered with the blood of our soldiers into the bosom of Russia ...
      Say thanks to Gorbachev and those who promoted him! Friendship with the West!? Get it and sign up!
  10. -4
    April 21 2023 17: 27
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    What options could there possibly be?
    Such options that the February revolution could not have happened at all. We must not forget that the February coup is the fruit of the reforms caused by the so-called "First Russian Revolution" of 1905. Which muddied, alas, the Bolsheviks. If not this PRR, then we would have emerged victorious from the war with Japan. And WWI probably would not exist at all. Well, or it would be, but on completely different conditions for us. And with a different result.
    1. +3
      April 21 2023 23: 01
      We must not forget that the February coup is the fruit of the reforms caused by the so-called "First Russian Revolution" of 1905. Which muddied, alas, the Bolsheviks.
      And what is the connection between the Bolsheviks and all kinds of "cadets" plus British intelligence in the February Revolution.?
    2. 0
      April 21 2023 23: 09
      905 years. Which muddied, alas, the Bolsheviks
      But you don't have to talk about the dog!
  11. -1
    April 21 2023 17: 36
    Fully agree with this
    Quote: paul3390
    When we are told about the terrible type of guilt of the Russian people before the Crimean Tatars, for some reason no one wants to remember history

    However, I would like to ask you this:
    Quote: paul3390
    .. How many millions of Russians were driven into slavery by them, what colossal material losses they caused us ..

    And really how much? Maybe with millions you still somehow exaggerated? And with material losses?
    And another moment. If we take the "period of deportation into slavery" so to speak, then which number will be greater: the number of deported into slavery or the number of deaths from epidemics and various non-epidemic diseases?
    Oh yes, during the same period there is a period of persecution of the Old Believers. How many Old Believers burned themselves or were exterminated in other ways?
    In addition, during this period there were the Great Troubles and peasant uprisings. I wonder if there were more or less victims of the Troubles and uprisings than the number of "driven into slavery"?
    1. +2
      April 21 2023 23: 04
      As if the Crimean Khanate was a very restless neighbor. And in fact, the Wild Field became massively populated after its liquidation.
  12. +1
    April 21 2023 23: 39
    Quote: Seal
    Maybe with millions you still somehow exaggerated

    Look on the Internet, I came across this information, a study by some scientist, and, it seems, not of Russian citizenship, he, based on statistical data on sales of slaves on the "trading floors" of Crimea for one or two centuries, made a general conclusion about millions of slaves , so this is not for all the time and without taking into account those who did not survive during the haul of living goods, so the Crimean Tatars, or rather their ancestors, drank gloriously Slavic blood and the effort to whitewash, to be politically correct in this matter is bewildering.
  13. 0
    April 22 2023 00: 40
    The author, which "Constantinople" dreamed of revenge? Where did you find it in the Ottoman Empire? Constantinople fell in April 1453. And ceased to exist. There is Istanbul or, as the Turks call it, Istanbul. Everything else is our phantom pains and reflections. The same is ridiculous to hear about the Patriarchate of Constantinople and the so-called "Ecumenical" Patriarch. He has been gone for a long time. There are Phanariots and a Phanariot patriarch - naked, barefoot, practically without a flock. On the content of the Turkish authorities, being a retired military man.
  14. Eug
    0
    April 22 2023 06: 44
    Lots of similarities to today...
  15. +3
    April 22 2023 07: 04
    Chufut-Kale is emptying year by year
    in kenas they glorify the Russian tsar
    Slaves leave, the king gave them freedom
    but he, of course, did it in vain

    Noisy stream, and jets of cool winds
    but take a closer look - there are traces of war everywhere
    The palace is deteriorating, there is no money to fix it
    the pipe is leaking, there is no water in the fountain

    There is little space for herds on the coast
    dacha doctors and professors
    roads are built through passes
    there are nests of swallows, gazebos of winds

    Palaces there are built in the Moorish style,
    they are building a fortress city, building a fleet
    Jagged crest of the Genoese towers
    over the years, like yesterday's dream, will go away

    The barefoot dervish will not come down, as before,
    at the pier of merchant ports
    Camels don't go the way they used to
    there is no production from Russian cities

    A harem eunuch sleeps peacefully in Istanbul
    in the night you can not hear the cries of Russian maidens
    Theodosian trade collapsed
    slaves do not hear the mournful melody

    Russian soldiers are marching with a song,
    and the echo from the mountains comes in response
    Civilization has perished forever
    It's all over - there is no production from Rus'.
  16. 0
    April 22 2023 11: 03
    Quote from lisikat2
    I have her Portrait on my phone .. I also like her grandson Pavel: he introduced a lot of reasonable things in Russia. I advise you to read more about Paul

    Exactly, and start reading reviews from Suvorov's letters)) , there it was specifically written about Pavel's merits.
  17. 0
    April 22 2023 11: 08
    There, then everything was easier. Peter laid the foundation for the military industry, he himself did not live, and his descendants took full advantage of it. I'm more interested in why Russia was called the gendarme of Europe and why they got into the Seven Years' War. Yes, it was under Elizabeth, but even then they climbed into all European strife and southerners and Asians interfered, in general, everything they could reach.
  18. -1
    April 22 2023 11: 13
    Quote: Buhach
    Quote: Seal
    Maybe with millions you still somehow exaggerated

    Look on the Internet, I came across this information, a study by some scientist, and, it seems, not of Russian citizenship, he, based on statistical data on sales of slaves on the "trading floors" of Crimea for one or two centuries, made a general conclusion about millions of slaves , so this is not for all the time and without taking into account those who did not survive during the haul of living goods, so the Crimean Tatars, or rather their ancestors, drank gloriously Slavic blood and the effort to whitewash, to be politically correct in this matter is bewildering.

    It is fashionable for the Cossacks to marry "Turkish women", as they called all Muslims, did they take them for love or paid them with money? Or maybe they were just taken into slavery? Then everyone did it, the common practice. Moreover, the Zaporizhzhya Cossacks, including, supplied "European" slaves to the Crimea, and what does this prove to whom?
    1. man
      +1
      April 22 2023 17: 16
      It is fashionable for the Cossacks to marry "Turkish women", as they called all Muslims, did they take them for love or paid them with money? Or maybe they were just taken into slavery? Then everyone did it, the common practice. Moreover, the Zaporizhzhya Cossacks, including, supplied "European" slaves to the Crimea, and what does this prove to whom?
      It depends on what kind of Cossacks. The Don and Kuban were taken solely out of love, the Urals paid kalym and only the nasty Zaporizhzhya Khokhlok Cossacks were enslaved, for which they are getting now. Here!
  19. 0
    April 22 2023 11: 18
    Quote: Seal
    Fully agree with this
    Quote: paul3390
    When we are told about the terrible type of guilt of the Russian people before the Crimean Tatars, for some reason no one wants to remember history

    However, I would like to ask you this:
    Quote: paul3390
    .. How many millions of Russians were driven into slavery by them, what colossal material losses they caused us ..

    And really how much? Maybe with millions you still somehow exaggerated? And with material losses?
    And another moment. If we take the "period of deportation into slavery" so to speak, then which number will be greater: the number of deported into slavery or the number of deaths from epidemics and various non-epidemic diseases?
    Oh yes, during the same period there is a period of persecution of the Old Believers. How many Old Believers burned themselves or were exterminated in other ways?
    In addition, during this period there were the Great Troubles and peasant uprisings. I wonder if there were more or less victims of the Troubles and uprisings than the number of "driven into slavery"?

    No matter how blasphemous it sounds, but the Russian warriors, often, upon discovering the Old Believers, drove them into prayer huts and burned them. Which is better, slavery, with the possibility of surviving or escaping or being burned alive, one might say? An alternative, albeit a dubious one. Why is the question always raised considered on the one hand, a purely fascist approach. Truth, meanwhile, is always in the middle.
  20. 0
    April 22 2023 11: 21
    Quote: Max1995
    God, what idealism...
    They plowed Scythia, sacred meaning ....

    In fact, IMHO, everything is simple.
    The empire should expand, and Crimean rudeness is a small, weak state, simply inconveniently located for Russia at that time (like all emirates, principalities, etc.), Crimea is an unsinkable Battleship (an unsinkable aircraft carrier in modern terms), it also controls all trade and military in one way or another ports in the district, the times of feudalism with vassal bays and principalities ended, only whole large empires and kingdoms in Europe.

    The fate of the khanate and all the little things was a foregone conclusion.

    There is simply nothing to add, of course, if there is an army, then it must be used, and then there was enough money, it was a sin not to use it.
  21. 0
    April 22 2023 11: 43
    Quote: Senior Sailor
    And after all, what the scoundrel thought up, demanded that the officers (only think!) Not eat hari in the villages, but serve in their regiments!

    Here is a dilemma, the decree of Peter III, you know, was canceled, and under the wise Catherine, the nobles could not serve the state. And the wise Paul spoiled the wise mother. And here everyone writes that Catherine 2 was especially gifted, well, yes, Dashkova just didn’t stand nearby))
  22. 0
    April 22 2023 12: 29
    Better ask yourself why Peter -1 bought the Baltic lands from the Swedes for a lot of money with local slaves inhabiting it, if then Russia had to disconnect it for free and make enemies in their face!?
    1. man
      0
      April 22 2023 17: 21
      Better ask yourself why Peter -1 bought the Baltic lands from the Swedes for a lot of money with local slaves inhabiting it, if then Russia had to disconnect it for free and make enemies in their face!?
      Expanded the window to Europe...
      1. +1
        April 22 2023 23: 00
        I could buy one land, and send the Balts themselves ON! to the Swedes!
  23. -3
    April 23 2023 09: 36
    It is obvious that Catherine did something stupid. Fortunately, Khrushchev corrected her mistake.
  24. 0
    April 24 2023 10: 06
    Quote: Buhach
    Look on the Internet, I came across this information, the study of some scientist,
    I know perfectly well what floats on the Internet. All research on this issue did not even come close to statistics. Which, in fact, did not exist in those days at all. All "assessments" were made solely on subjective perception.
    Also, it should be taken into account.
    1. In the Crimea, so to speak, the "period of slavery" was limited to 7 years. I fully admit that there were abuses all the time. But nevertheless, nevertheless, some part of those stolen in full after 7 years returned from the Crimea to their homeland.
    2. In the Muslim Crimea and on the territory of the Ottoman Empire, it was rather dumb to keep Polonians in slavery. Since if a slave declares that he has decided to convert to Islam, then a fair amount of hemorrhoids falls on the owner of such a slave. The owner is obliged not only to give the slave freedom, but also to provide his former slave with housing and money (for the first time).
    3. Many prisoners were ransomed in a short time. In Russia, we officially had an item of expenses for ransom from captivity.
  25. 0
    April 24 2023 10: 22
    Quote: mann
    It depends on what kind of Cossacks. The Don and Kuban were taken solely out of love, the Urals paid kalym and only the nasty Zaporizhzhya Khokhlok Cossacks were enslaved, for which they are getting now. Here!
    Yes. It depends on what Cossacks. After all, the Cossacks were also of the Muslim faith.
    According to the book “Statistical description of the land of the Don Cossacks, compiled in 1822-1833”, “... in the Don army there are also Tatars living near the city of Novocherkassk in a special village and on the Manych River, in the village of Darinka. For about 200 years they have been living on the Don, serving on a par with the Cossacks and enjoying all their privileges...
    The Tatars belong to the Mohammedan confession, have their own mosque and are subordinate to the Orenburg Mufti” [39].
    In 1819, the Kazan Tatars were assigned to the Cossacks of the village of Borozdinskaya, and in 1837, the Tavlins (from Dagestan). The Don Cossack chieftain Sary-Osman is known, but it is not known whether this is a name or a nickname (“red-haired Turk”).
    The Decembrist historian V. Sukhorukov, speaking about the beauty of the Don Cossacks, wrote: “Imagine the beauties of luxurious Asia, the features of Circassians, Turkish women, Tatars, Russians mixed together, and then you will get a general idea of ​​the beauty of the inhabitants of the Don” [40].
    Sources of the nineteenth century. give many examples of the voluntary transition to the Cossack class of Kumyks, Circassians. Thus, the number of Cossacks in the village of Lukovskaya from 1856 to 1866 almost doubled. Statistics from 1875 report that the main ethnic groups in the village, in addition to Russian Cossacks, were 772 Circassians and 182 Ossetians.
    The authorities took into account the spiritual needs of the Gentile Cossacks. So, for example, mosques were built for Muslim Cossacks, elections of clerics were organized. It was not easy for the authorities to control the organization of various aspects of the life of Muslim warriors. The task became even more complicated during the years of the Crimean War of 1853-1856, when one of the opponents of Russia was the largest Muslim power - Turkey.
    One of the legislative decisions prepared in the last days of the reign of Nicholas I was specifically devoted to the regulation of the religious life of the Muslim Cossacks (12.02.1855/XNUMX/XNUMX). The Military Council of the Russian Empire adopted the "Rules for organizing the spiritual life of the Mohammedans of the Cossack class."
    According to the document, 18 Muslims were in the staff of the Don, Black Sea, Caucasian linear, Ural, Orenburg, Siberian linear Cossack troops and the Tobolsk Cossack regiment. Their spiritual needs were served by 599 mosques and 114 Muslim clerics.
    According to Russian legislation, the creation of a parish required the presence of at least 200 male Muslims, the staff of the servants of the cathedral mosque could include 3 persons (imam, khatib, muezzin), while an ordinary mosque consisted only of an imam and a muezzin. These ministers were first elected locally, in the presence of village chiefs, "by at least two-thirds of the Mohammedan Cossacks belonging to the parish of the mosque."
    Then the ministers underwent "spiritual tests" in the Orenburg or Taurida muftiats. Naturally, the “political reliability” of each candidate for the post of spiritual minister among Muslims was assumed, who could take his position only after being approved by the local military administration [41].
    Muslim Cossacks have been living in the Orenburg village of Varna since ancient times. “It is significant that at the same time it was not necessary for the Cossacks to change the paternal faith to Orthodoxy. Muslim Cossacks from the Bashkirs and Tatars remained faithful to Muhammad. Mosques stood in the villages, mullahs served in the regiments.
  26. 0
    April 24 2023 10: 23
    Quote: Hagakure
    Wise, after all, was Baba Catherine ..... ....

    A.S. Pushkin, who in his youth in a number of works still admired the time of Catherine, wrote in bitterness in the thirties:
    But over time, History will appreciate the influence of her reign on morals, reveal the cruel activities of her despotism under the guise of meekness and tolerance, the people oppressed by the governors, the treasury plundered by lovers, will show her important mistakes in political economy, insignificance in legislation, disgusting buffoonery in relations with philosophers of her century - and then the voice of seduced Voltaire will not save her glorious memory from the curse of Russia".
  27. 0
    April 24 2023 10: 38
    Quote from Natalie Y.
    He has been gone for a long time. There are Phanariots and a Phanariot patriarch - naked, barefoot, practically without a flock. On the content of the Turkish authorities, being a retired military man.
    In fact, half of Greece recognizes the supremacy of the Patriarch of Constantinople.

    In addition, the Patriarchate of Constantinople includes two local autonomous churches operating in Finland and Estonia.
    And in general, there are plenty of parishes of the Patriarchate of Constantinople all over the world. That's just Europe.
  28. +2
    April 24 2023 10: 44
    Quote: paul3390
    And in general - if in good conscience, then of the living peoples, the Greeks have the most rights to the Crimea. Their colonies were there more than 2500 years ago .. When the Tatars were not heard of even in their native places .. So - who is the indigenous population there is another question ..
    That is, the Greeks, about whom you yourself write, that they arrived in Crimea as colonists, such as indigenous people, right? Well, then how are the Greeks fundamentally different from the Tatars? Only by the fact that the Greeks seized the Crimea and were engaged in the slave trade BEFORE the Tatars ??
    Commercials can be called the Spaniards and the Portuguese "indigenous" inhabitants of the American continent. After all, they also arrived on the American continent as colonists. Exactly the same as when the Greeks arrived in the Crimea.
  29. 0
    April 24 2023 10: 56
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    Quote: Max1995
    and Crimean rudeness is a small, weak state, simply inconveniently located for Russia at that time

    belay What did you drink? Weak, 300 years of robbery and the slave trade, and we could not do anything.
    Come on. In addition to the slave trade, there was much more.
    The Crimean khans were interested in the development of trade, which gave significant profit to the treasury. Among the goods exported from the Crimea are raw leather, sheep's wool, morocco, sheep's coats, gray and black sheepskin coats.
    Kaffa was a major trade and economic center, and the seaport of the city played an important role in this. Thanks to this, the city had extensive trade relations. Merchants were attracted here, first of all, by slaves, then by bread and fish. The export of food from Kaffa was very significant in those days. Metals (lead, copper, tin, iron in bars, steel and metal products), oriental fabrics, faience dishes, tobacco, coffee, etc. were brought to Crimea. 500-600, sometimes up to 900 and even 1000 loaded carts arrived in the city daily. , and by the evening none of them had any goods left.
    Handicraft production in the Crimean Khanate developed quite successfully, the products of artisans were of high quality and artistic skill. Some of the products are unique and of high artistic value.
    Bakhchisaray was famous for its leather production - numerous leather dressing workshops stretched along the Churuk-Su. A whole quarter was occupied by felt workers, several quarters were occupied by metalworkers: gunsmiths, locksmiths, coppersmiths, tinkers.
    The high degree of craft development achieved in the 32th century led to the creation of craft workshops. Artisans were united in XNUMX guild corporations headed by a senior master (usta-bashi) and two assistants: they regulated production and prices, supervised the admission of students and the initiation of students into masters (it was a big city festival with religious rites).
    Handicraft products were in great demand and were very diverse. Manufactured: copper utensils, shoes, clothes, jewelry, embroideries, carpets, felt, etc.
    In the Crimea, there has long been a workshop of weavers. Fabrics were produced from cotton, linen, silk, wool on ancient machines, production traditions were observed. Woven towels with patterned ends were made.
    Embroidery, which was practiced by women, became widespread in the Crimea. Both from the artistic and technical side, it had deep traditions: each seam, each ornamental motif had its unpretentious, but figurative names. Jewelry and filigree craft was also developed, beautiful jewelry and dishes were made.
    Since ancient times, there were excellent woodworking artisans among the Crimean Tatars. Subsequently, workshops of turners and chest makers were formed. Some masters of such workshops were both carvers and incrusters, performed artistic and technical work on the decoration of dwellings.
    In addition to decorating houses, these craftsmen made a number of household items: “beshik” - baby rocking cradles, “samdyk” - walnut chests inlaid with bone, mother-of-pearl and light-colored wood; multifaceted tables, also decorated with inlay, and other various small household items.
    The special pride of the Crimean Tatar craftsmen was "kilims" - woolen lint-free double-sided carpets. The predominant range of colors: intense dark blue velvet, the same yellow, brown. Undertones: turquoise, pink, green, cream with a light tone of the whitest wool. Coloring was carried out with vegetable, mineral and animal paints.
    The Crimean Tatars, like their ancestors, greatly appreciated animal husbandry, which was a way of earning money and getting food. Among domestic animals, horses were in the first place. Some sources claim that the Tatars preserved two different breeds that have long lived in the Northern Black Sea region, preventing them from mixing. Others say that it was in the Crimean Khanate that a new type of horse was formed, which was distinguished by endurance unprecedented at that time. Horses, as a rule, grazed in the steppe, but the herdsman, who is also a veterinarian and breeder, always looked after them. A professional approach was also observed in sheep breeding. In addition to horses and sheep, the Crimean Tatars raised cattle, goats and camels.
    1. 0
      5 May 2023 16: 26
      Why didn’t crafts flourish after joining the huge market of all of Russia. The answer is simple. Everything was done by either slaves or Christian Armenians, Russian Greeks, who paid a special tax as "infidels" .. how can you even compare whole centuries of devastation of oppression (theft of millions) from the steppe to Rus' or short vengeful raids of the Cossacks? Which were sporadically in some separate decades.
      The Russians didn’t sell them into slavery en masse .. well, they took Turkish girls, Circassian women as wives .. So it’s better for them to convert to Orthodoxy and give birth to strong beautiful children .. otherwise, somewhere, their relatives themselves could be sold into slavery or exchanged for a horse Or a good gun
  30. 0
    April 24 2023 11: 04
    Quote: Ua3qhp
    As if the Crimean Khanate was a very restless neighbor. And in fact, the Wild Field became massively populated after its liquidation.
    It was restless. But for some reason, this did not at all prevent the Don Cossack army from living in the very immediate vicinity of the Crimean Khanate.
  31. +3
    April 27 2023 14: 06
    Quote: Mordvin 3
    And then engaged in idiocy. Type Prussian orders in the army introduced. Remember Suvorov's expression: "Powder is not gunpowder, a scythe is not a cleaver, I am not a German, but a natural hare!" After all, Paul introduced reforms into the troops.


    It was thanks to Paul that a clear mechanism of succession to the throne was formed, the leapfrog ended when the new ruler (female, as a rule) was determined by the capital's guardsmen after another drinking bout.
    Pavel did not like Suvorov, but he recognized his talent, which is typical. He put the interests of the case above personal antipathies, which is not given to everyone.
    The Prussian order is not optimal, but still better than a mess, there was enough mess before Paul.
    Pavel carried out many useful reforms, from finance to military affairs.
    He created such a field charter for artillery that he outlived Paul for a long time. The fact that the Russian artillery on the Borodino field was not much inferior to the French (the best in the world) is also a merit of Paul.
    But he remained in the mass consciousness as some kind of weirdo ... nevertheless, anti-PR is a very effective tool.
    1. -1
      2 May 2023 10: 40
      Yes. For the first time in the Russian army, Pavel introduced the concept of a winter uniform. He delivered a true benefit to the soldier - the obligatory state overcoat. Since that time, a warm overcoat has become popular in Russia. It is used not only by the military, but also by civilians as the most comfortable winter clothing.
      Pavel established for the soldiers on guard to wear especially warm winter clothes - sheepskin coats and felt boots.
      About the braid. As I understand it, in those days there were two types of wigs - either with long curled curls (which is unimaginable for soldiers), or with a small pigtail. Otherwise, wigs from wig manufacturers did not work out. Why are there wigs in the army? For hygienic purposes. Lice fight!!! The soldiers under Pavel began to cut their hair bald. But so that the head would not freeze, and to make the soldiers look more presentable, Pavel introduced wigs for the soldiers.
      1. -1
        2 May 2023 11: 19
        Quote: Seal
        The soldiers under Pavel began to cut their hair bald. But so that the head would not freeze, and to make the soldiers look more presentable, Pavel introduced wigs for the soldiers.

        Correct! Instead of a hat - a wig, which must be curled, sprinkled with flour and sprinkled with kvass. And he was called - lice.
  32. 0
    April 28 2023 08: 23
    Quote: Seal
    It was restless. But for some reason, this did not at all prevent the Don Cossack army from living in the very immediate vicinity of the Crimean Khanate.


    So it is an army that does not mind waving a saber. Having a sparring partner by your side to keep yourself in good shape definitely didn't hurt.
    If there had been no Crimean Khanate, those lands would have been populated not by daring Don people, but by peaceful plowmen.
  33. 0
    1 May 2023 15: 15
    As always excellent from the author.
    As for Taurida, well, it was necessary to put an end to this predatory enclave that traded in the slave trade and robbery, so they slammed it.
    So it goes...
  34. 0
    4 May 2023 12: 34
    Quote: mordvin xnumx
    Quote: Seal
    The soldiers under Pavel began to cut their hair bald. But so that the head would not freeze, and to make the soldiers look more presentable, Pavel introduced wigs for the soldiers.

    Correct! Instead of a hat - a wig, which must be curled, sprinkled with flour and sprinkled with kvass. And he was called - lice.
    You see, if you don't know something, then you would ask first before you start hitting the keys. The wig was not called the term "lice". Vshiven is something else.
    «
    There is no crazier Prussians. Lauser, or lice, was called their cloak"
    A.V. Suvorov. The Science of Victory (1759)
    The wig was so good that, unlike the hat, clothes (linen) louse did not start in it.
    And the head louse does not live in the dress. She needs hair and contact with the human head.
    Sprinkle flour and sprinkle kvass - these are either excesses on the ground, or from jokes about Pavel.
    By the way, a steel bar was hidden in the braid of the wig, protecting the neck from a saber blow from behind.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"