Whip the Great. viking king

67 157 109
Whip the Great. viking king
Whip the Great


Among the many interesting and sometimes mysterious characters of the very difficult Viking Age (VIII-XI centuries), one can definitely distinguish two personalities with undeniable superiority - this is Rollon* (Robert I, 860-932), the founder of Normandy, and Knut the Great (990-1035) - the king of England, Denmark and Norway, sometimes called the "Emperor of the North". Both of them were maritime leaders, and each of them represents the high point of that great northern migration movement, except that Rollon can be attributed to the early period of the Viking migration, and Cnut to the later and final phase of it.



Let's start from afar...


By the end of the 8th century, strange dragon fleets of pagan northerners or Vikings, as they called themselves, appeared in the waters of Europe. And from that time on, for more than two hundred years, the shores of Europe were in constant fear of the blond and red-haired beasts who held the entire sea coast of Europe in constant fear. It was during this period that the Vikings settled on the Faroe Islands, Iceland, the British Isles, Greenland, Russia, and even reached the American continent - the Newfoundland Peninsula.


Viking ship (Drakkar)

The predominant field of activity for Viking campaigns has always been the British Isles, located from their habitat just three days across the North Sea, and due to climatic conditions, which could become a second home for the Scandinavians.


Reconstruction of a Viking dwelling in Greenland

But the constant attacks on England were only one of many pages of Viking raids - while some Scandinavians established their barbarian states in Ireland and England, others paved routes south to the Mediterranean Sea, and there they were already engaged in raiding the southern coast of France and plundered Italian cities.


viking shoes

The Viking hordes sacked Paris and made military expeditions along the entire coast of the German and French rivers, they moved along the Neva River through Lake Ladoga to the Volkhov River and Lake Ilmen and through the Dnieper went to the Black Sea and further - to Byzantium, to the very walls of Constantinople ...


Settlement of the Vikings in the North Atlantic

And one of the best representatives of the Viking Age is Knut the Great, the king of England, Denmark and Norway, who began his "career" as a sea robber, but eventually turned into a statesman - a unifier of Northern Europe.

Youth affairs


One of my main problems when writing an article was where to start this story? In the usual way, with which any biography often starts - from childhood, upbringing and education received, it is almost impossible, because Knut, and then he was not yet "Great", lived in an era when there was almost no writing in Northern Europe, when there was a place and Hero's year of birth unknown...

We know little about Knut's life before 1013, when his biography is gradually beginning to clear up - by this time he was less than 20 years old, and when he accompanied his father - Sven Forkbeard* in his successful invasion of England in the month of August 1013. After this invasion, the English king Ethelred II the Indecisive* fled with his family to the mainland - to neighboring Normandy, and Sven Forkbeard proclaimed himself the new king of England. However, everything that concerns the biography of Knut, we know from the Scandinavian sagas that have come down to us, and not from more reliable sources.


Emma flees from the advancing Sven Forkbeard in 1013, along with her two sons from Ethelred the Indecisive - Edward and Alfred. She sought protection from her brother, the Duke of Normandy. From handwritten miniatures of Cambridge - "The Life of King Edward the Confessor" for 1250-1260.

But in February of the following year, after the sudden death of Sven Forkbeard - Cnut's father, the Danish army proclaimed Cnut as their king, but the assembly of the English nobility (Witenahemot) refused to recognize him as king and instead voted to invite the defeated king Æthelred the Indecisive from Norman exile to the English throne.

The exiled Ethelred did not delay with the invitation - with the help of Witenagemot, he quickly gathered an army and forced Cnut to immediately leave England and sail with the remnants of his army back to Jutland. Sailing past the coast of Kent, Cnut mutilated all the hostages given to his father as a pledge from the local English nobility, hinting that all violators of the oath would certainly be punished.

English affairs. Invasion


After the death of his father, Sven Forkbeard, Knut's younger brother Harold II (Harald) became the king of Denmark, and Knut, returning from England, offered him to jointly rule the kingdom, which his brother did not like at all. Harold nevertheless promised him his help and support in a future invasion of England, but on the condition that Knut completely renounce his rights to the Danish throne.

And so in the summer of 1015, assembled by Knut fleet, consisting of more than two hundred ships and having on board ten thousand mercenaries recruited from all over Scandinavia (and even from Poland), set out on a journey to conquer England.

Encomium Emmae Reginae* ("Praise to Queen Emma"), the account that has come down to us, describes Knut's invasion fleet - a brilliant weapon warriors on board, brightly colored shields hanging along the sides, figures of warriors sparkling with silver and gold, figures of lions, fiery dragons and bulls with gilded horns.


“Praise to Queen Emma” is a panegyric composed by an anonymous author in Latin during the reign of King Hardaknut (1040–1042) commissioned by the widow of Cnut the Great, Emma of Normandy

And the chronicler wonders - who could look at such an army without trepidation and not be afraid of the leader, by whose order it came. Knut's warriors have also been carefully selected:

“In addition, in the entire detachment there were neither serfs, nor freedmen, nor of humble origin, nor weakened by old age. All of them were nobles, all strong, full of masculinity, suitable for all kinds of battles and so fast on foot that they despised the speed of the cavalry.

Whether this was an exaggeration of the chronicler or not, it is quite clear that Knut led a valiant and well-armed army.

So the Danish invasion force landed in Wessex, which was easily captured. Northumbria was next in line. Knut summoned Uhtred, the alderman (earl) of Northumbria, to a peaceful meeting and, for violating the oath given to his father Sven Forkbeard two years earlier, executed him and the forty people accompanying him.

Further, Cnut with his fleet returned south, entered the Thames and laid siege to London. King Æthelred II of England died suddenly during the siege, and his son Edmund Ironside was proclaimed the new king. But when Edmund left London to replenish his army, he was intercepted by Cnut on Ashingdon Hill (Essex), where King Edmund Ironside's camp was located. After that, a decisive battle followed - and Edmund was forced to ask for peace.


Cnut fighting Edmund Ironside at the Battle of Assandun, depicted with Edmund Ironside (left) and King Cnut (right). From a manuscript from the 1300s. Author: Matthew Paris, Chronica Majora, Cambridge

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle tells of the outcome of the battle as follows:All the nobility of England perished there.".


Edmund Ironside and Cnut make peace on the Isle of Olney, believed to have been an island in the River Severn in Gloucestershire, and agree that Cnut will rule north of the Thames and Edmund the south

Having met on one of the islands of the Severn River, Cnut and Edmund agreed to divide Edmund's possessions, but the death of Edmund (according to the widespread version, he was killed) in November of that year made Cnut the sole ruler of England, and in January 1017 the English Witenagemot (a collection of English nobility ) recognized him as the rightful king of England.


Medieval illustration of the death of Edmund Ironside. According to one of the widespread versions, he was killed by an arrow in the toilet.

In order to somehow tie yourself to the English dynasty and protect your kingdom from an attack from neighboring Normandy, where the other sons of the deceased Ethelred II the Indecisive (Edward the Confessor) were* and Alfred Ætheling*), Knut decided to marry the widow of Ethelred II - Emma of Normandy, daughter of the Norman duke Richard the Fearless.

Note. The Church did not recognize this marriage.

English affairs. reforms


After the execution of the disloyal Anglo-Saxon nobles, Cnut's first action in the England he conquered was the administrative division of it into four large counties - Wessex, Mercia, East Anglia and Northumbria, which was to become the basis of the system of territorial possessions and underlie English sovereignty for several centuries.

Having taken the English throne, Cnut promised his subjects protection from Viking raids and restored all English laws adopted under the old kings, partially reforming them and creating new ones, the most important of which were the laws “On Heroes and Help” and “Inheritance in the absence of a will” , compiled in Old English and divided into two parts - on ecclesiastical and secular issues. And in his message to the people, Knut emphasizes the equality of all his subjects before God, the king and the law, regardless of their ethnicity.


Code of Laws of King Knut. London, British Library

Being a good administrator, Cnut consolidated the English and Danish departments into one whole and initiated the issuance of new coins that would have the same weight as those used in Denmark and other parts of Scandinavia, which greatly improved the trade of England, whose economy was stagnant after many years of military upheavals. Coins of English coinage dating back to the era of Knut have been found in many parts of Europe, including Rus', indicating a brisk trade exchange between England and continental Europe.


Silver penny minted by King Whip

Thus, Knut is usually considered a sensible and efficient ruler - pursuing a policy of national reconciliation, he brought England more than twenty years of peace and prosperity, where the Danes and Anglo-Saxons were on an equal footing. The bilateral merging of the Danish conquerors and the local Anglo-Saxons has been going on for more than a century, thus, the conquest of England by Knut was the logical conclusion of the entire Scandinavian expansion to the island, starting from the end of the XNUMXth century - from the very beginning of the Viking Age.

Having overthrown the legitimate royal dynasty of Wessex (the house of Cerdic), Cnut actually continued its work of uniting all of England, relying on the already existing traditions of lawmaking, introducing new laws and pursuing a balanced internal policy to integrate new annexed territories, the center of which was England.

Danish affairs


In 1018, the king of Denmark, Knut's brother Harold II, died, and the Danish kingdom passed to Knut.

Trying to confirm his succession as king of Denmark, he sailed home to Jutland, declaring his firm intention to prevent Danish Viking raids on England, where he had to spend two years pacifying the Danes, dissatisfied with the new king, forbidding them to plunder England.

Considering his power in Denmark strong, in the spring of 1020 he returned to England, appointing his son-in-law Ulf Jarl as governor of Denmark.

Norwegian affairs


Taking advantage of the absence of Knut in Denmark, King Olaf II Haraldson (Saint) of Norway, with the support of the Swedish king Anund Olafsson (Uglezhog), attacked the Danes in the Baltic Sea in 1026, completely devastated the territory of the island of Zeeland and removed the regent appointed by Knut (Ulf Jarl), who tried to plant to the Danish throne of the son of Knut - the minor Hardeknut.

Knut, the rightful king, had no choice but to urgently gather a fleet in England and personally sail to save his possessions. Knut's military campaign was successful - the allied forces of the Norwegians and Swedes were ousted from Denmark, and the newly appointed ruler was executed by the conquerors.

Wanting to put an end to the external threat emanating from Norway in the person of its king Olaf II Haraldson, in 1028 Cnut in England (according to other sources, in Denmark) gathers a fleet of fifty ships, lands in Trondheim and conquers Norway. The fact is that, in addition to the victories of the military, Knut secretly “fed” the Norwegian jarls with handouts, who, at a critical moment for the Norwegian king Olaf, sided with Knut, leaning towards offers of gold and promises for the future.

After such a defeat from Knut, Olaf II Haraldson, taking with him his four-year-old son Magnus (later King of Denmark and Norway), was forced to flee to neighboring Sweden and then to Rus', to the wife of the Kiev prince Yaroslav the Wise - Ingigerda.

At a meeting of the nobility in Trondheim Knut, he was officially recognized as king, and his new title was "King of all England, Denmark, Norway and parts of Sweden".


All possessions of Knut are highlighted in red

Putting on the Norwegian crown, Knut tried to rule by force, cunning and intrigue - he ruthlessly destroyed his enemies, bribed possible allies, flirted with free landowners and eliminated competitors, and in his attempts to legally establish himself in Norway, he even turned a blind eye to the paganism that still existed there .

On a note. Yielding to the call of his Norwegian supporters in 1030, the exiled Olaf returned back to Norway, where he tried to regain the throne with the help of the Swedes supporting him, but was killed in the battle of Stiklastadir, fighting with the army of the Norwegian tribal nobility and free landowners.

After the death of Olaf, his son Magnus was adopted by Yaroslav the Wise and brought up in his family, but lived in Novgorod. Already after the death of Knut, the Norwegian Jarls, with the assistance of the Kiev prince Yaroslav the Wise, crowned Olof's son Magnus to the Norwegian throne, and after the death of Knut's son, Hardeknut, he inherited the Danish throne according to the law.

Spiritual Affairs


After such impressive campaigns in the countries of Northern Europe and appeasing his opponents, the "Emperor of the North", dressed in a modest robe and taking a staff in his hands, as pilgrims always do, decided to personally go to continental Europe to meet with the Pope and the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire , for Knut's northern power had already become prominent enough to start contacting such political heavyweights.


Antique engraving of King Cnut listening to the monks of Ely (cathedral city in Cambridgeshire). Knut used to visit the monastery at the Presentation Day to celebrate the day of the Entry of Jesus into the temple.

Whether Knut's adherence to the Church was the result of his deep religious fanaticism or merely a means of consolidating his political power is impossible to say now. And even though Knut after the conquest was still recognized as a Christian ruler, his army, with which he took possession of England, was mostly pagan, so he had to sit on two chairs and turn a blind eye to pagan religion.

During his pilgrimage to Rome, Knut visited the West Frankish kingdom, Germany and Italy, where he proved himself a true Christian, observed all the rituals and generously donated to charity. It should be noted here that there are still discussions between historians - whether he actually went to the Eternal City to repent of his sins, or had a more mundane goal - to attend the coronation of the Holy Roman Emperor Conrad II.

While in Rome, Knut obtained the consent of Pope John XIX to exempt the English Church from a significant part of church taxes, and with Christian monarchs he resolved the issue of a preferential duty that English pilgrims should pay for ensuring their protection on the way to Rome.

Here is what Knut writes in 1027 in his letter already from Denmark on his way back to England:

“... spoke with the emperor himself, Mr. Pope and the princes there about the needs of all the people of my whole kingdom, both English and Danes, that they should be granted a fairer law and a more reliable peace on the way to Rome, and that they were not hampered by so many barriers to Rome and the road, and she is worried about unfair fees; and the Emperor agreed, and also King Robert, who governs the majority of these very toll gates. And all the magnates confirmed by edict that my people, both merchants and others who travel to offer their prayers, can go to Rome and return, without encountering barriers and toll collectors, in firm peace and safe under a just law.

Posthumous cases


Cnut died in 1035 in Shaftesbury (Dorset), but was buried in Winchester (Hampshire) in the Old Cathedral, founded by the barbarian "king" of Wessex, Kenwall.

The northern state, created by Knut with such persistence, immediately began to fall apart after his death. The English nobility refused to recognize his son Hartakanut, who sat on the throne as Knut III, as their king, because he spent too much time in Denmark, and the exiled son of King Olaf II, Magnus I, returned to Norway and regained his lands and throne Kind, nicknamed "Good", because, on the advice of the court skald, he refused to avenge the death of his father.

Summarizing the time that came after the death of Knut, then in England, complete confusion and vacillation began, associated with the struggle for power, which lasted until the year 1066, i.e. before the landing on the island of William the Conqueror (William Rufus), who brought complete order to the former English possessions of Knut.

During the English Revolution of the XNUMXth century, the Roundhead soldiers (supporters of Parliament) who robbed the cathedral scattered the bones of Knut on the floor of the tomb and they lay among other bones, in particular, the bones of William the Conqueror. After the restoration of the monarchy, the bones were collected and replaced in their burial chests, although somewhat out of order...


Knut and Emma's coffin at Winchester Cathedral. Knut's name comes last on the second line. During the English Civil War, the revolutionaries emptied all the coffins containing the royal bones. After the English monarchy was restored, the monks carefully dismantled the royal bones. However, there is no certainty that this sarcophagus contains the bones of Knut and Emma.

The merits and deeds of Knut were sung by skalds in Old Norse poetry - he was portrayed as a heroic Viking warrior. So, for example, in the "Knitling Saga" he was portrayed:

“tall and strong, he was recognized by men, all but his nose, which was thin, high set and rather hooked. Nevertheless, he had a fair complexion and beautiful thick hair. His eyes were better than those of other men, and more beautiful and sharper.

His large "Northern Empire" lasted a very significant time - from 1016 to 1035, and was a force that all monarchs of that era had to reckon with, and Knut was listed as the second most powerful European sovereign, after the Holy Roman Emperor. The creation of the state by Knut was long and difficult, but after only a few years after his death with such difficulty, the state he had created with such difficulty was destroyed and was no longer restored in its former form ...

A little legendary


The whip is perhaps best remembered by later generations for the legend of how he gave orders to the waves of the sea. According to the legend that has come down to us, he was tired of the endless flattery of his courtiers and, when one of these flatterers declared that the king could even command the sea, Knut sat on a throne near the coast (Beauchamps, West Sussex). But after the waves wet his feet, he recognized the impotence of earthly rulers and took off his crown, declaring that only the Lord has real power. Apparently, story this one is inspired by the Christian idea of ​​humility and humility, as well as submission to earthly power - spiritual power. And even centuries after his death, this legend of King Knut, who tried to command the waves of the sea, still remains in English folklore.


The whip orders the sea not to wet his feet. Victorian drawing. Author: Rafael Tak

Information


*Rollon (Robert I, nicknamed "The Pedestrian", circa 860-932). Viking, originally from the Orkney Islands, who made devastating raids on the West Frankish kingdom. Subsequently, he became the Duke of Normandy and became famous as a wise legislator and an active ruler. According to legend, not a single horse could bear him - he was tall and heavy. Hence the nickname - "Pedestrian".

*Sven Forkbeard (ca. 960–1014). King of Denmark, Norway and England. He got his nickname because of his long and split beard. He was the son of Harald Bluetooth, King of Denmark. Better known as the father of Knut the Great.

*Ethelred the Indecisive (968–1016). King of England (978–1016) of the Wessex dynasty of the House of Cerdic, who came to the throne as a child. After being defeated by the Danes, he left England with his family and moved to France.

*Encomium Emmae Reginae ("Praise to Queen Emma"). Along with the "Anglo-Saxon Chronicle", one of the few narratives that have come down to our time, describing the events of that time. In "Praise ..." tells about the conquest of England by Sven Forkbeard and his son Knut the Great, as well as the struggle for power after the death of Knut himself. There is an opinion that the chronicle contains a deliberate distortion of events, designed to justify the position of Queen Emma of Normandy (widow of Knut and mother of Edward the Confessor - one of the last kings of Anglo-Saxon England). Written by a priest from Flanders.

* Edward the Confessor (1003–1066). The eldest son of the English king Ethelred II the Indecisive and Emma of Normandy, the penultimate king of Anglo-Saxon England and the last of the Wessex dynasty on the English throne, King of England (ruled from 1042 to 1066). A century later, he was canonized by the Catholic Church.

*Alfred Ætheling (c. 1012–1036). One of the sons of the English king Ethelred II the Indecisive and Emma of Normandy. After marrying Emma, ​​Knut became his stepfather. In 1035, after the death of Cnut, he landed in England and tried to break into London, but was betrayed, captured by the earl of Wessex and blinded, after which he died.

References:
1. Glebov A. G. "England in the Early Middle Ages"
2. Gorelov M. M. "The Danish and Norman conquests of England in the XI century"
3. Lebedev G. S. "The Viking Age in Northern Europe"
4. Churchill W. "The Birth of Britain"
5. Bolton T. "The Empire of Knut the Great: Conquest and Consolidation of Power"
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    April 12 2023 04: 39
    Cool article "about the days of the past"! Sincere thanks to the author!
    Curious what "barbarian king" is the next story about?
    Good day to everyone, Kote!
    1. +10
      April 12 2023 04: 46
      Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
      Curious, what "barbarian king" is the next story about?

      I would like about Rollon, but there is almost nothing about him ...
      1. +9
        April 12 2023 05: 05
        Quote: Luminman
        Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
        Curious, what "barbarian king" is the next story about?

        I would like about Rollon, but there is almost nothing about him ...

        I agree, almost "semi-mythical" character. I don’t even know what is more “true or false” about him!
        But can Rollon the Walker be considered a king? Didn't he formally become an independent autocrat?
        1. +11
          April 12 2023 05: 13
          Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
          Didn't he formally become an independent autocrat?

          The founder of Normandy is already something...
          Besides, even though he was a duke and a vassal of the king, he did what he wanted...
          1. +4
            April 12 2023 10: 04
            "King's vassal" has a funny story associated with it.
            When Roland captured Normandy, he decided to stay there. .
            Roland, as a vassal of the king, had to take a "vassal oath". The king sat on the horse, and Roland had to kiss the king's boot. But Roland decided not to humiliate himself and instructed one of his warriors to do it. The Viking needed to take the king's leg and kiss it, and he grabbed the king by the leg and pulled with all his foolishness. The king slumped to the ground, under the feet of the Vikings.
            So Roland did not swear allegiance to the king and only formally called himself a subject of the king
      2. +7
        April 12 2023 09: 19
        I would like about Rollon, but there is almost nothing about him ...




        Pierre Bouet, Rollon: Le chef viking qui fonda la Normandie.
        320 pages, most recent biography of Rollo (2016). Collected everything that is known to date. Is on the network.
        1. +6
          April 12 2023 09: 24
          Quote: sergej_84
          Le chef viking qui fonda la Normandie

          French is not available to me.

          P.S.. It is curious what can be written in this book, if in one monograph it is proved that he existed and went down in history as the Duke of Normandy, in another monograph it is proved that he did not exist at all ... wink wink
          1. +1
            April 12 2023 10: 17
            It is curious what can be written in this book, if in one monograph it is proved that he existed and went down in history as the Duke of Normandy, while in another monograph it is proved that he did not exist at all ...

            And here in one book both versions are considered.
            1. +5
              April 12 2023 11: 25
              Quote: sergej_84
              And here in one book both versions are considered

              This author would not go into writers, but into business!
              A smart businessman would have come out of him ... wink
              1. +3
                April 12 2023 12: 30
                This author would not go into writers, but into business!

                This author has no business in business, he feels at home in history. Pierre Bouet is a renowned specialist in the study of Norman and Anglo-Norman historical sources of the 10th - 12th centuries. Professor at the Université de Caen Normandie and founder of the Office Universitaire d'Etudes Normandes. Why does he need all this fuss?
                A very interesting interlocutor.
    2. +12
      April 12 2023 05: 23
      Cool article "about the days of the past"! Sincere thanks to the author!
      Can Nikolai. If "N" - Nikolai? Thank you.
    3. +14
      April 12 2023 06: 25
      Cool article "about the days of the past"!

      I read it in one breath.
      Kuntsev, as always, is on top.
      Thank you! hi )))
  2. +7
    April 12 2023 06: 08
    So, everything is described correctly, but I would like to clarify who the Vikings are.
    The author writes:
    "And in the summer of 1015, the fleet assembled by Knut, consisting of more than two hundred ships and having on board ten thousand mercenaries recruited from all over Scandinavia (and even from Poland), set off on a journey to conquer England" (c)
    For example - are the Poles also Vikings?
    1. +10
      April 12 2023 07: 26
      Quote: ee2100
      For example - are the Poles also Vikings?

      I'm afraid that even Knut himself will not answer this question ...

      PS Along with the Scandinavians, not only the Scandinavians themselves participated in the raids. There were Finno-Ugric peoples, Celts, Slavic Slavs and Germans (from the continent). From my point of view - the Poles are also Vikings - in this case. On the other hand, it was the time of the decline of the Viking Age and the Poles could turn out to be ordinary mercenaries...
      1. +4
        April 12 2023 08: 21
        Please tell me, who are the Finno-Ugric people?
        1. +6
          April 12 2023 08: 28
          Quote: ee2100
          Please tell me, who are the Finno-Ugric people?

          You can see it on Wikipedia
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            April 12 2023 09: 54
            Udmurts and Mordovians? Or Hungarians and Mansi?
            1. +4
              April 12 2023 11: 27
              Quote: ee2100
              Udmurts and Mordovians? Or Hungarians and Mansi?

              Yes, everyone who lived in the Baltic - sum, eat, Estonians. It is possible that the Sami with the Kvens ...
              1. +3
                April 12 2023 11: 36
                Do not take everything to heart, even if you described yourself somewhere.
                As far as I know, the word "Viking" came into circulation in the XNUMXth century and now it refers mainly to Scandinavians. the leaders were indeed Scandinavian. And the raids were indeed attended by representatives of all neighboring and not only neighboring tribes.
                In Rus', they were called the Varangians (the Varangian Sea), and the PVL directly says that the Varangians are like us. Read we are Vikings.
                The British conducted a DNA test from the remains, almost 100% of these are teeth that were unearthed in the cemetery of Visby.
                It is believed that this is a Viking cemetery. From the material they received, they found that 40% were identified as Tatars.
                This information was in the BBC movie, somewhere around 2010.
                1. +6
                  April 12 2023 11: 44
                  Quote: ee2100
                  40% were identified as Tatars

                  I'll tell you more! Somewhere in the south of England, they conducted a DNA study at a found cemetery and it turned out that there is 100% of the Scythian subclade. Miracles...
    2. +9
      April 12 2023 11: 19
      Now in historiography, as far as I understand, the most common point of view on the concept of "Viking" is that this word denoted sea robbers, regardless of their ethnicity, despite the fact that the word itself is, of course, of Scandinavian origin. The Vikings could be both Slavs and Finno-Ugric peoples. If I'm not mistaken, G.S. Lebedev wrote about the "Estonian Vikings". He went to the sea to rob - it means a Viking. Moreover, this concept had a clear negative connotation for those who remained on the shore, such as lazy, gouging, adventurer, bandit, robber, instead of working, building a house, starting a family, running away for adventure, and to hell with it, let him drown there, otherwise he will return, he will demand his share in the inheritance ...
      As for the Poles in Knud's army, this can be explained by one of the versions of his origin, according to which Knud's mother was a Polish princess - the daughter of Boleslav the Brave, the very one who fought with Yaroslav the Wise.
      1. +6
        April 12 2023 11: 30
        Quote: Trilobite Master
        "Viking" the one that this word denoted sea robbers, regardless of their ethnicity

        They called themselves Vikings, as you rightly said, regardless of ethnicity, although the etymology of this word is unknown. In Rus' they were called Varangians, on the continent - Normans, and in England - Danes...
        1. +5
          April 12 2023 11: 53
          Quote: Luminman
          In Rus' they were called Varangians, on the continent - Normans, and in England - Danes...

          Varyag is still a rather late term, apparently from "var" - an oath, most likely in the meaning of "mercenary". And the Scandinavians, who had already "acclimatized" in Rus' much earlier, quite clearly separated themselves from the later Vikings.
          1. +4
            April 12 2023 12: 00
            Quote: Mihaylov
            And the Scandinavians, who had already "acclimatized" in Rus' much earlier, quite clearly separated themselves from the later Vikings

            And the "kings" of the English Denlo also spat on the Varangians from above. They were considered third-rate... wink
          2. -1
            April 14 2023 00: 06
            Acclimatized in Rus'? Radbard, Randver, Sigurd Ring, Ragnar Lodbrok, Bjorn, the founder of the Munse dynasty ... who acclimatized where ???. And I forgot about sinfjetli with turfing laughing
        2. +7
          April 12 2023 12: 12
          Normans - people of the north, that is, Scandinavians, their common name. True, in Rus' it was the Norwegians who called the Normans (Urmans), distinguishing them from the Svei, Danes, Angles, Dutch, etc.
          The Danes are a Scandinavian tribe, similar to the Jutes, Frisians, Angles, Saxons, etc. In other words, all Danes are Normans, but not all Normans are Danes.
          The Varangians are warriors who swore allegiance to any leader, also regardless of ethnicity. It was possible to be a Varangian, Slav or Korel and not be a Viking at the same time
          Viking, most likely, from the word "vik" - a sea voyage.
          1. +5
            April 12 2023 12: 25
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            all Danes are Normans, but not all Normans are Danes

            The inhabitants of Britain called all the Vikings by a collective word - Danes. For the inhabitants of continental Europe, they were Normans, from whom it was necessary to keep away, and they did not understand the types of northern sh...t... wink

            Quote: Trilobite Master
            True, in Rus' it was the Norwegians who were called Normans (Urmans), oh

            Never heard of such a word. All were either Germans or Varangians...
            1. +8
              April 12 2023 12: 41
              In the annals there are Svei, Urmans, Danes, Angles - for sure. Germans - a common name for Europeans with a different language - Sveian Germans, Fryazhsky Germans, Gotland Germans, etc.
              The Varangians, I repeat once again, are not an ethnic name, but denoting that its bearer belongs to the squad of a certain leader. The Varangian guard in Constantinople consisted of anyone - Scandinavians, Slavs, Celts - it doesn't matter.
            2. -1
              April 14 2023 00: 11
              In the tale of bygone years. Svei, Urman, English, Galicians, Volkhov ...
          2. +6
            April 12 2023 13: 09
            Viking, most likely, from the word "vik" - a sea voyage.

            I don't know what source you used, but all the "local" experts like Jan Terje Faarlund claim that Old Norse vík - bay, cove, fjord. + -ingr - "one who often visits". We get Old Norse víkingr (-r - nominative case) - "one who often visits coves".
            1. +7
              April 12 2023 13: 52
              Quote: sergej_84
              "one who is often in the bays."

              i.e., makes sea trips.
              Somewhere I came across such a construction as "he went to Vic". The same Lebedev calls "viks" fortified trading posts, such as Birka or Ladoga. It seems that the word "vik" itself had several meanings in the modern sense. It seems to me that one should not look for a XNUMX% identity of ancient concepts with modern ones.
              1. +3
                April 12 2023 19: 51
                The same Lebedev

                I respect Gleb Sergeevich Lebedev very much, but in this matter, let's be objective, he is not an authority at all. It is somehow not even correct to mention him in matters that he did not deal with.
          3. 0
            5 June 2023 20: 22
            Liutprandt. Normans we call people from the north. Archbishop of Cremona
        3. +6
          April 12 2023 13: 24
          although the etymology of the word is unknown
          One Norwegian history enthusiast once explained to me that a viking is someone who goes on a vik - sea robbery - and feeds from it.
          1. +7
            April 12 2023 13: 53
            Quote: Bolt Cutter
            "local" experts like Jan Terje Faarlund claim

            All local experts for a couple of centuries now, spears have been breaking their heads, finding out the etymology of this word. We, non-native speakers of the Scandinavian languages, can only listen to them ...
          2. 0
            5 June 2023 20: 29
            And one historian explained to me that faith in sowing. Germany were present. Even the truth is. Anglov and Verinov, nicknamed the Thuringians
  3. +11
    April 12 2023 06: 31
    Viking hordes sacked Paris
    I'm terribly sorry, but when did the payment of compensation begin to be considered robbery?
    And so, the article is not bad, thanks, the author?
    1. +7
      April 12 2023 07: 28
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      when the payment of compensation began to be considered plunder

      What do you think it is? Is Regnar's sack of the city a favor of the Vikings?
      1. +5
        April 12 2023 07: 49
        In my opinion, looting is a consequence of the capture of a settlement, as a result of hostilities. And in your opinion, Brenn also sacked Rome?
        1. +5
          April 12 2023 08: 02
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          In my opinion, plunder is a consequence of the capture of a settlement

          Well, they took Paris. Looted. And then he also had the audacity to demand indemnity. The same thing with Brenn... The only difference is that the confrontation between Rome and the Gauls was political, and the sacking of Paris by the Vikings was an ordinary robbery...
          1. 0
            April 12 2023 08: 07
            Well, they took Paris.
            The Normans did not take Paris.
            1. +7
              April 12 2023 08: 10
              Quote: 3x3zsave
              The Normans did not take Paris.

              They took it just in time for Easter...
            2. +5
              April 12 2023 08: 51
              The Normans did not take Paris.

              The Normans besieged Paris four times, the first in 845, the second in 856, the third in 861 and the fourth in 885. The duration of the sieges varied (the last one lasted almost two years), but the outcome, except for the last siege, was always the same - the Normans took the city and then, by threatening to completely plunder and destroy it, received a ransom for leaving the city.
              1. +5
                April 12 2023 09: 20
                It probably made sense for the author to point this out, I meant the last siege.
                1. +3
                  April 12 2023 20: 16
                  It probably made sense for the author to point this out, I meant the last siege.

                  Yes, it made sense for the author to indicate a lot of things, but he drowned in the enthusiastic cries of depressants.
  4. +3
    April 12 2023 08: 14
    During the English Revolution of the XNUMXth century, roundhead soldiers (supporters of Parliament) looting the cathedral
    In what, what century?
    the bones of Knut on the floor of the tomb and they were lying among other bones, in particular, the bones of William the Conqueror.
    Knut was also buried in Normandy, in Caen? And in 1563, the male abbey of St. Stephen was devastated by the Huguenot troops during the religious wars in France, and William's tomb was devastated, the marble mausoleum was destroyed, and only the tibia was preserved from the remains of the king, which was reburied in the church of St. Stephen.
    After the restoration of the monarchy, the bones were collected and replaced in their burial chests, although somewhat out of order...
    The monarchy was restored in 1660, and the cathedral was destroyed in the year 1648? And all this time the bones were lying around the cathedral?
    1. +6
      April 12 2023 08: 26
      Quote: parusnik
      (supporters of Parliament)
      In what, what century?

      Clearly this is a typo...

      Quote: parusnik
      Knut was also buried in Normandy, in Caen?

      This is a gross technical error of my text editor - overlaying one page of text on another ...
      Not William the Conqueror, but Alfred the Great...
      If the administration grants access to editing, then I will correct ...
      1. +1
        April 12 2023 09: 00
        It is clear that this is a typo.
        This is a gross technical error of my text editor.
        [Quote] [/ quote]
        They were mirrored in a similar article on your blog "Articles from boredom" a month ago. hi
        1. +4
          April 12 2023 09: 13
          Quote: parusnik
          They are mirrored, displayed in a similar article

          Everything was loaded from one base. And it hasn't been tested... wink
          1. +3
            April 12 2023 10: 12
            Everything was loaded from one base. And it hasn't been tested.
            laughing laughing laughing Yes, as in the song: "Of course I believe you" (c)
            1. +3
              April 12 2023 11: 22
              Quote: parusnik
              Yes, as in the song: "Of course, I believe you" (c)

              You may or may not believe. You can walk right past...
              1. +4
                April 12 2023 15: 29
                You can even pass by..
                .You can not appear? Are you the ultimate truth? smile Everything that you have written is not subject to criticism and comments? smile By the way, in such cases, Samsonov, one of the authors, VO, simply writes a complaint to the admins about the comments, and they issue warnings and ban. laughing You can do the same, no need to threaten. laughing If you really wrote the article, then when you copied it again, you would notice these errors. But as it is, I get the impression that you are simply copying Zen articles. hi
                1. +3
                  April 12 2023 16: 26
                  Quote: parusnik
                  Are you the ultimate truth?

                  In general, almost all of my statements have a global meaning ...

                  Quote: parusnik
                  Here, by the way, in such cases, Samsonov, one of the authors, VO, simply writes a complaint to the admins about the comments, and they issue warnings and bans.

                  Keep us updated...

                  Quote: parusnik
                  And so, it seems to me that you are simply copying Zen articles.

                  As long as you manage to make me laugh... wink
    2. +2
      April 12 2023 10: 37
      "in what century" Alexey, probably the roundheads had a time machine? I myself paid attention to the date, but I did not pay attention to "the bones were lying around the cathedral". I simply forgot these dates, and you will remember
      1. +3
        April 12 2023 16: 20
        The English Revolution is well depicted in Soviet school textbooks, it was given much attention, as was the French one. Well, that's okay. Many have read the trilogy about the musketeers? These events are also reflected there, as well as the execution of Charles I and the return of Charles II to the throne, there is a gap of time between these events. And you should remember the series of articles by Shpakovsky on VO, dedicated to the Bayeux tapestry, everything was examined in detail there. Where William the Bastard the Conqueror died, where he is buried. And then such a nuance, the decline of Winchester Cathedral, began under Henry VIII, when he declared himself the head of the Anglican Church, the reconstruction of the cathedral began then and continued later. Therefore, to say that it was the "round-headed" bones that were thrown out is somehow groundless.
        1. +7
          April 12 2023 17: 21
          Quote: parusnik
          Where William the Bastard the Conqueror died, where he is buried.

          Thank you, just now I noticed another unforgivable mistake of the author.
          During the English Revolution of the XNUMXth century, the Roundhead soldiers (supporters of Parliament) who robbed the cathedral scattered the bones of Knut on the floor of the tomb and they lay among other bones, in particular, the bones of William the Conqueror.

          It was not William the Conqueror who was buried in Winchester, but William the Red, his son. Wilhelm Sr. is buried in Canet, the then capital of the Duchy of Normandy.
          The Tomb of the Conqueror also got it, but not from the roundheads, but from the Huguenots.
  5. +5
    April 12 2023 08: 34
    Medieval illustration of the death of Edmund Ironside. According to one of the widespread versions, he was killed by an arrow in the toilet.

    I'm sorry, but why don't kings close the door to the toilet behind them? laughing I would have observed the rules of decency, like all normal people, and would not have received an arrow in the toilet. wassat
    1. +1
      28 May 2023 21: 27
      "Close the door to the toilet..."
      And how could he get an arrow in the back, sitting facing the door?
  6. +7
    April 12 2023 08: 37
    OK!..
    I'll wait until the experts corrosively trample on the Author, then you can enter into a normal conversation wassat )))
    What strange days have gone ...
    I went in early and did not even say hello, as if everyone was in good health - the sea plus the river flowing into it.
    Hello, forum of connoisseurs and curious ignoramuses! Let there be a feast of the mind or, at worst, of the spirit! )))
    1. +1
      April 12 2023 08: 48
      the sea plus the river flowing into it.
      The Seine, where the Vikings climbed and sacked Paris.
      1. +6
        April 12 2023 09: 10
        Anton, in 845, the Vikings actually occupied Paris, having received compensation they left it. In 858, they laid siege to it, again paid off, in 885 they already fought back.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +4
        April 12 2023 09: 19
        Quote: 3x3zsave
        Vikings sacked Paris.

        We are talking about different stories. The most famous sack of Paris was in 845 by the Viking Regnar Lothbrok, a significant figure at that time, before whom all of Europe trembled. If you mean Rollon, then he did not take Paris - he limited himself to indemnity ...
        1. +3
          April 12 2023 09: 28
          Well, we've figured it out!
          Personally, I consider the last siege more significant in consequences than the first.
          1. 0
            April 12 2023 10: 20
            Well, we've figured it out!
            I wonder what was in the deleted comments? smile
            1. +2
              April 12 2023 12: 51
              Well, like what? In the first of the deleted comments - shaking one of the volumes of the twenty-volume World History of the capture of Paris by the Vikings, clutched in his hand.
              And in the second - "You're shaking with the wrong volume, ignoramus!"
              I love reading this, too bad it got deleted
              1. +2
                April 12 2023 15: 14
                Sorry we passed smile Shpakovsky, Vashchenko, such comments are not deleted. Masters, because ..
            2. +2
              April 12 2023 12: 56
              "deleted comments", probably, ornetology was combined with geography?
              Lesh, welcome.
              1. +1
                April 12 2023 15: 12
                I didn't read the deleted comments.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        3. +6
          April 12 2023 09: 38
          Regnar Lodbrok - a significant figure at that time

          It is difficult to judge a semi-legendary personality. Regnar is a legendary person, professional historians everywhere emphasize this. Whether it was, or not. See, for example, comments on Regnar in "Circle of the Earth" M. 1980.
          Of course, his popularity is now huge, thanks to the Vikings series.
          But, like Rollo, so did Regnar either exist or not. The answer here is simple, in what reliable sources are there about his activities?
          hi
          1. +6
            April 12 2023 09: 45
            Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
            But, like Rollo, so Regnar was either there or not.

            In fact of the matter...
            For example, in one book dedicated to the Vikings, it was indicated that Regnar Lodbrok plundered the Lindisfarne monastery in 793, although he had not yet been born at that time ... wink
            1. +5
              April 12 2023 12: 59
              the monastery was sacked in 793 by Regnar Lodbrok, although he had not yet been born at that time ...

              Well, glory diverges in circles from the point of origin. One semicircle goes to the future, the other to the past, in which the hero has not yet been born. For in the future, all descendants are ready to record the legendary personality as their very distant ancestors.
              Origin matters.
          2. -1
            5 June 2023 21: 43
            In 845 Paris was captured by a certain Reginheri. Some annals. Fuldensis, Bertiniani... I don't remember... but I read it for sure. Translation from Latin)
          3. 0
            5 June 2023 22: 04
            There was for sure. But it has nothing to do with Lindisfarne. It seems there are reference points: the great pagan army. Bjorn, the founder of the Malmö dynasty. Ivar, the tyrant of Adam of Bremen. Sigurd the snake-eyed, died in 890... and at the same time, the Swedes have Bjorn about 100 years older than his father, and Aslaug is the daughter of Sigurd, the killer of Fafnir) You need to drink a lot of ale, before you understand at least something in mythological thinking
  7. +3
    April 12 2023 09: 24
    Good morning everyone.
    Author, thanks for sharing. I don’t know your creative plans, but I hope that Knut is not the last Scandinavian that was told about
    1. +5
      April 12 2023 09: 36
      Quote from lisikat2
      I don't know your creative plans

      Yes, there are no special plans. As the article is indexed on another site, I will immediately upload it here about Vinland ...
  8. +2
    April 12 2023 10: 31
    "Regardless of their ethnicity" for that time and circumstances - more than progressive. "equality before God, king and law"
    Later, Catherine II did the same. When she arrived in Crimea, some of the nobles began to "rub down" the Crimeans. The Empress "pulled them down." The Tartars are the same subjects and have equal rights with the Russians.
  9. +6
    April 12 2023 10: 43
    There is one more gross mistake the author made today.
    until the year 1066, i.e. before landing on the island of William the Conqueror (William Rufus),

    In 1066, the Duke of Normandy William (if you call him in Latin) or Guillaume, if you call him as his contemporaries called him, landed in England, and he himself called himself. William - the English version of the same name, this person could not bear in any way. At the same time, the nickname of Guillaume of Normandy was "ok", that is, the Bastard, therefore, in 1066, it was not William Rufus who entered the land of England, but Guillaume Betar. He received the nickname "Conqueror" not from his contemporaries, but from his descendants.
    William Rufus, or as contemporaries said, William Rufus (Red), was the second son of Guillaume of Normandy, and after the death of his father as the second son, he inherited his father's second most important title - the title of King of England, because the main title - Duke of Normandy was inherited by his elder brother Robert Kurtgoz (Robert Short Pants).
    1. +3
      April 12 2023 11: 18
      Quote: Trilobite Master
      He received the nickname "Conqueror" not from his contemporaries, but from his descendants.

      When you label it Conqueror, it is immediately clear what kind of Wilhelm we are talking about. It is clear that during his lifetime Red or Bass. The whip is also called Great already after his death.

      Quote: Trilobite Master
      or Guillaume

      The name sounds somehow in French, however, there was no such language at that time. More like North German Willem or Yelle. Yes, and the name William at that time, in my opinion, was not there either, probably all the same Willem or Yelle...
      1. +7
        April 12 2023 11: 40
        Red is the son of the Bastard.
        I have never heard of my father having such a nickname. You don't need to confuse them.
        Bastard himself was precisely Guillaume - the double "l" in the French tradition is read as "y", that is, Guillaume or Gllâome, this is strictly and unambiguously Guillaume.
        William the Red is referred to in the chronicles as Williame, that is, Vuillaume. I can't say why there is such a difference.
        Quote: Luminman
        The name sounds somehow in French, however, there was no such language at that time

        There was Old French and its Norman dialect.
        1. +3
          April 12 2023 11: 56
          Quote: Trilobite Master
          There was Old French and its Norman dialect.

          Old French is a huge layer of Germanic languages, on which the so-called. "Vulgar Latin". I mean, we don't know how it all sounded phonetically...
          1. +6
            April 12 2023 12: 16
            Quote: Luminman
            we don't know how it all sounded phonetically

            Historical linguistics allows you to reconstruct the sound of the language at one time or another. So, in general, we know.
          2. +3
            April 12 2023 20: 12
            Old French is a huge layer of Germanic languages, on which the so-called. "Vulgar Latin".

            Not Germanic, but Romanesque.
            1. 0
              April 13 2023 05: 32
              Quote: sergej_84
              Not Germanic, but Romanesque

              Romanesque they began to be called later ...
        2. +3
          April 12 2023 12: 49
          Mish, good health. Do you know French too?
          I am German, I used to learn it, but I have already forgotten it. I just remember that even before school I learned: guten morgen, guten tag, slap in the face - it will be so!
          1. +9
            April 12 2023 14: 07
            French I at school ... I wanted to write "studied", but my hand did not rise. Let's just say it was taught to me. Or rather, they tried to teach. But something grabbed and something in my head remained. At the university I already studied English - from scratch. But here it is already more useful. smile
            With German - at the same level as you. I also know "partisan stationed under the sofa." smile
            And this is also

            is also more or less clear. smile
            1. +6
              April 12 2023 14: 16
              Quote: Trilobite Master
              And this is also

              In the north, in the region of the Russian-Norwegian border, an amazing language has developed - russenorsk. It was spoken in the markets by the Norgs with the Russian population. Consisted of about 50% of Russian vocabulary and the same amount of Norwegian. After the Bolsheviks came to power and closed the borders, this language died ...

              Der dog runs along the strass - The dog is running down the street. It sounded like this... wink
              1. Fat
                +6
                April 12 2023 14: 41
                hi
                Their fange en. I sew.
                Es East for all Soviet places,
                For Russian people from edge to edge
                Baronial Uneer Manifesto.
                You all know my surname:
                Their bin von Wrangel, Herr Baron.
                I'm the best, the sixth
                There is a candidate for the royal throne.
                Listen, the Red Soldaten:
                Come on, you beat me?
                My government is all democratic,
                Not some junk.
                Clock with a broken spring -
                There is Soviet power.
                What a worker from a car
                Has a smart head?
                What a man, a man with a field,
                Will there be no fool?
                They have brains with such calluses
                How their calloused hand!
                Mit clay, stupid little mind
                All zo genanten coots
                Have power ?! Phew, this is too much!
                Ikh spreche: pfuy, give the plaintiff tsu fil!
                Without a noble estate
                Russian history is round zero.
                Schlecht! Not karosh orders new!
                Lenin deceived you!
                You must trust me, the baron,
                My word is solid is rock.
                Maine Kopf is waiting for the royal crown,
                The two-headed adler is my eagle.
                Holy Russland ... heilich erde
                Zi ligt im sterben, my land.
                I am from a white horse ... vom weissen pferde ...
                I’ll get off the tsum alten walls of the Kremlin.

                (c) Demyan Poor wassat
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              April 12 2023 19: 17
              I started learning German, but my dad moved to a new place, a new school, and there was English, then German again.
              Result: not edible porridge
      2. 0
        April 13 2023 16: 26
        The name sounds somehow in French, however, there was no such language at that time.

        French is derived from Latin. William of Normandy was French after he conquered England and French was spoken in Parliament for the next 300 years.
  10. +3
    April 12 2023 11: 24
    Thank you for the article! It has always been interesting what happened in the north (in Britain in particular) before 1066. And then there's this beauty... good
    1. +5
      April 12 2023 11: 36
      Quote: Obolensky
      Always wondered what happened in the north (in Britain in particular) before 1066

      After the Roman legions left in 410, and before the arrival of William the Conqueror, there was a complete mess on the island ... wink
      1. +1
        April 12 2023 21: 56
        Well, why ... the kings of the Picts, straight clyde, Wales are more famous than our princes from cue to saint vladimir
  11. +3
    April 12 2023 11: 30

    Despite the scale of the map, for the sake of justice, it should be noted that Iceland was discovered not by the Scandinavians, but by the Irish. However, it is possible that it was first visited in the era of the Roman Empire.
    1. +5
      April 12 2023 11: 34
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      Iceland was discovered not by the Scandinavians, but by the Irish

      It is believed that Iceland was discovered by some Greek merchant-adventurer in ancient times. Then the Irish monks moved there. And only then they were "pushed" by immigrants from Norway ...
      1. +1
        April 12 2023 21: 50
        The merchant's name was Pytheas... and yes, the Irish monks were in Iceland even before the Vikings. See the history of discovery and the saga of taking the land
  12. +1
    April 12 2023 12: 37
    "killed by an arrow in the toilet" wah, how embarrassing they are: a man went into the toilet, and his arrow. Sapsam got mad.
    And his successors were not afraid to go to the toilet. Or they didn't pee at all.
    1. +2
      April 12 2023 18: 30
      killed by an arrow in the toilet

      Honorable death on the toilet!
      A monument to her - in a folk tale ...
      Once remembered so, then so it was. The witnesses of history involuntarily tell the truth, to which disgruntled descendants try to give the meaning of frivolous rumors. But sometimes you can't hide the truth.
      Here's the very first thumbnail:
      Emma flees from the advancing Sven Forkbeard in 1013, along with her two sons from Ethelred the Indecisive - Edward and Alfred.

      The verdict of the era is brought to the fore.
      Emma has fled, and the lackeys of Sven Forkbeard are shaking out the wallets of characters who have turned up. Sven does not even look at what is happening near his horse, he knows what is there. As they say, he didn’t catch up, so at least he warmed up over the little things - everyday life, turning into a custom, and a custom into a law.
      1. +3
        April 12 2023 19: 10
        Quote: depressant
        Emma ran away, and the toadies of Sven Forkbeard shake out the wallets of characters who have turned up

        Then the son of Sven Forkbeard, Knut, marries Emma
        This is the Santa Barbara... wink
  13. +3
    April 12 2023 12: 53
    Interesting article. Based on these events, Harrison has a good trilogy (the cross and the king ...) although with a fantasy bias, but many events are recognizable
  14. +2
    April 12 2023 13: 27
    It was during this period that the Vikings settled in the Faroe Islands, Iceland, the British Isles, Greenland, Russia
    after such a statement, I still decided to continue reading, but after
    And in the summer of 1015, the fleet assembled by Knut, consisting of more than two hundred ships and having on board ten thousand mercenaries recruited from all over Scandinavia (and even from Poland)
    could not resist. Dear author, at that blessed time you describe, there was neither Russia nor Poland. From the word in general negative
    1. +4
      April 12 2023 13: 47
      Quote: Shkodnik65
      there was neither Russia nor Poland

      In this context, Poland and Russia are not political concepts, but geographical ones...
    2. -1
      April 12 2023 22: 00
      There were already Jomsvikings. Under Hjerungavag, the battle was 30 years earlier.
  15. +3
    April 12 2023 19: 21
    Luminman (luminman), dear, I have to correct you a little. The language of the Pomors was called "mine-your", the Norwegians - "like a sprek", today they still use the name "Rusnorg".
    The borders with Norway were closed by the defeat of the Red Army near Warsaw, the issues in the negotiations between the RSFSR and Finland on the ownership of the Petsamo region were decided at the negotiations in Berlin in 1918. Our NKID could not develop a unified position on the border issue at Petsamo. But after the "Miracle on the Vistula" Finland decided that Petsamo was its territory. On October 05, 1920, Finland signed a peace treaty with the RSFSR and the parties agreed to demarcate the border by autumn 1921. On June 01, 1922, the parties signed a number of documents: "Agreement between Russia and Finland on measures to ensure the inviolability of the border"; "Protocol attached to the agreement"; "Instructions for the Border Subcommission and Local Control Commissions of the Central Mixed Russian-Finnish Commission". Demarcation work continued throughout the 1920s and early 1930s (especially long on the islands of the Gulf of Finland). Formally, this process was completed only in 1938, when in April the "Final Protocol of the Mixed Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Republic of Finland of the Border Commission for Determining the State Border between the USSR and Finland" was signed. It was the Finns who closed the RSFSR border with Norway in 1922. The border between the RSFSR and Finland passed through the Sredny and Rybachy Peninsulas.
    True, in the very northeast of the Rybachy Peninsula there remained the settlement of Tsyp-Navolok (founded in the 70-80s of the 19th century), where Norwegians (in 1929: 114 people, and in the entire territory of the current Murmansk region - 167 people), and Finns, Karelians, and Russians lived. In 1930, the fishing collective farm "Polar Star" was created. And although Norwegians were the majority in Tsyp-Navolok until 1940, they were not recognized as a national minority, unlike the Finns and Sami who lived on the Kola Peninsula. At school, teaching was in Russian. And parents with children spoke Norwegian at home. The first meetings of the national Tsyp-Navoloktsky village council of the Aleksandrovsky district of the Murmansk district of the Leningrad region (formed in 1927) were held in Norwegian, and from 1935 - only in Russian. In 1931, the Aleksandrovsky district was renamed Polyarny, in connection with the renaming of the village of Aleksandrovskoye to Polyarnoye. At the same time, the Polyarny district received the status of a Finnish national one.
    From July 05, 1940, by the NKVD Order of June 23.06.1940, 00761 No. 1941 "On the resettlement of citizens of other nationalities from the city of Murmansk and the Murmansk region", the entire Norwegian population of Tsyp-Navolok was deported to Karelia in: Zaonezhsky, Pudozhsky, Medvezhegorsky, Sheltozersky districts. In June XNUMX, after Finland crossed the state border of the USSR, all Norwegians were deported to my native Arkhangelsk region as special settlers.
    1. +4
      April 12 2023 20: 06
      Quote: Tests
      all Norwegians were evicted to my native Arkhangelsk region

      And why the Norwegians? It seems that the people are loyal, and Norway itself became a victim of German aggression - on the contrary, this should unite ...
  16. 0
    April 12 2023 21: 45
    Hrolf Regnaldson. From Mer, Norway. See the Saga of Hrolf the Pedestrian. By the way, the Saga of the Inglings seems to be dedicated to his father, since Regnvald Mersky is the last in the list.
  17. +3
    April 12 2023 22: 06
    Luminman (luminman), dear, I don't know. After all, the Swedes, Finns, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians were evicted with the Norwegians. And in the same Order: "to resettle 675 families in the Altai Territory, consisting of 1743 people of Germans, Poles, Chinese, Greeks, Koreans and others, for resettlement in the following areas:
    There are 326 households in the Loktevsky district; Zmeinogorsky -150; Kuryinsky -199".
    On December 29, 1939, the Council of People's Commissars approved the "Regulations on the special settlement and employment of settlers evicted from the western regions of the Ukrainian SSR and the Byelorussian SSR." And on February 10.02.1940, 11, the "settlers and foresters" went to 85 republics, territories and regions of the USSR, including Arkhangelsk. According to estimates: 15% were Poles, 12% were Ukrainians and Belarusians. On August 1941, 1941, by the Decree of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, Polish citizens were amnestied. And in the fall of 1941, along the Northern Dvina, with their families, steamships from Arkhangelsk to Kotlas were gathering them into Anders' army. They were met by former citizens of Czechoslovakia - pilots and technicians who expressed their readiness to fight in the skies of Great Britain. So the QP convoys from Arkhangelsk to Britain in the autumn of XNUMX carried not only cargo, but also future RAF officers, non-commissioned officers, sergeants and soldiers...
    And the Ingrian Finns were deported for many years, including the exile of the siege survivors according to NKVD documents in 1941 to the Arkhangelsk region. And according to the Resolution of the Military Council of the Leningrad Front in 1942 to Siberia... The Finns, Izhora and Vod were deported not only by the bastard Bolsheviks, but also in November 1943 by the Germans, from the occupied territory of the Leningrad region to Finland (to Paldiski - by train, from Paldiski - by sea).
  18. +2
    April 13 2023 05: 31
    Quote: Tests
    all Norwegians were evicted

    And what is the fate of the evicted Norwegians? Did they return to their place or disappeared into the local population?
  19. +3
    April 13 2023 11: 26
    Luminman (luminman), respected, some of the Norwegians in 1942, the year was the hungriest in the Arkhangelsk region, from hunger and diseases remained with us forever. After the war, some of the former residents of Tsyp-Navolok left for Norway. Some returned to the Murmansk region. They were allowed to live in Port Vladimir (artillerymen were stationed in Tsyp-Navolok, later - air defense units and a construction battalion, the entire Rybachy Peninsula was a border zone). But in 1969, the entire civilian population was evicted from Port Vladimir, because of the Northern Fleet units, that the fishing village began to be developed in 1960.
    1. +2
      April 13 2023 16: 38
      Quote: Tests
      some Norwegians...
      ... hunger and disease forever remained with us

      Never even thought about it.
      Closed another cell of his memory! Thank you...