The real truth about gender
Cheat sheet for the general public in Russia and abroad
In the State Duma there is a draft federal law No. 284965-3 “On state guarantees of equal rights and freedoms of men and women and equal opportunities for their realization (On state guarantees of equal rights of women and men)”, which was submitted to the State Duma by deputy E. Lakhova, adopted in the first reading of 16 on April 2003 and was in the archive until 2008. The Committee Chairman, Deputy E. Mizulina made her corrections to the draft law and tries to submit it to the deputies of the new 6-th convocation for adoption in the second and third readings. nii.
The law has caused the broadest public outcry and has already given rise to various attempts to direct the activities of the parent community to a safe course for gender lobbyists, making them last and presenting them to the innocent victims of illiterate social activists. Due to the fact that the scheme of the law is multi-level, the actions of lobbyists and their associates from among the “public” are calculated and sensibly motivated, the reader is very difficult to understand the intrigue, and therefore it is necessary to identify key points.
The draft law defines two open and two hidden parallel conceptual lines that carry their separate semantic loads: legislation and family.
OPEN CONCEPT LINE "LEGISLATION": EQUALITY OF WOMEN AND MEN
The Russian legislation has an established system of legal norms that secure equal rights for men and women in all spheres of public life, and also establishes sanctions for the violation of these rights up to criminal responsibility. Equality of rights of women and men as the main thesis in the title of the law is already presented in Russian legislation: equality of rights of women and men is contained in the Constitution of the Russian Federation (Articles 19, 29, 34, 35, 36, 37 of the Constitution, etc.).
The equality declared by the draft law regardless of gender in receiving education (clause 1st. 10 of the draft law) is already regulated by the Law of the Russian Federation “On Education” (Article 5 of the draft law); equal opportunities for persons of both sexes in entering and passing state and municipal services (Art. 17, 18 of the draft law) repeat the norms of the federal laws "On the Fundamentals of the Civil Service of the Russian Federation" (Section 5, Art. 5) and "On the Principles of Municipal Service in Russian Federation "(paragraph 6, article 5); equal access of men and women to vacant jobs (paragraph 1,2, article XXUMX) is already enshrined in the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, etc.
All this and other information has already been submitted to the conclusion of the Legal Department of the State Duma on the bill from 2003, and they also caused the negative conclusion of the Government of the Russian Federation on the bill from 2008.
The question of the equality of the positions of men and women has never been a national idea of Russia, for the cultural and religious traditions of the people to restore men and women against each other has always been unusual, and an attempt to present the social and legal situation in the country as stalled without adopting the said law seems too far from reality state of affairs.
Consequently, the draft law on gender equality of the Federal Law No. 284965-3 does not aim at duplicating the equal rights and freedoms of the legislator for men and women, but has as its task the transformation of Russian legislation by introducing into the legal field a new concept of “gender” or “social gender ".
Feast of feminism
For those who believe that the law is only that “everything is equal”, it would be nice to understand some things.
To think that “gender equality” - “is good, because then men will come to school”, means to deceive ourselves. Where do men go to school if all the other conditions - education, health care, social services, family policy - are not guided by this? If boys are less educated by men, but by infantile "half-women" who no longer have an idea of generosity, chivalry and responsibility. And such “men” at school are even worse than none.
But it’s not at all that it takes the inflamed minds of proud feminists, but the dreams of the desired places in power. Here, they will take the law, and we will be ruled for “kingdom” under the white. True, this will have to drive hundreds of thousands of men out onto the street, but this is already “behind the scenes”. The main thing - to us "in fairness."
It is hardly reasonable to be deceived by the prospects of a “social elevator” (as it is fashionable now to denote the mythical magical leap into a higher social stratum - without difficulty and effort), which the “gender ideology” will open. After all, when it comes to gender equality, grant feminists want to think that this is only about the equality of their chances of passing to the State Duma, but then there is another side. Equality, so equality - and then be kind enough to share the "sweetness of labor" in the mines and in laying asphalt, in the logging and in the unloading and loading operations. Jobs are open, and all - equally!
And the equality of gender rights for men when recruiting nannies to kindergarten or dressmakers in a studio? Or the “gender quota” for admission to the maternity hospital? Also a real prospect. In the framework of “gender quota allocation”, all places should be occupied strictly in equal shares, and even if there are not enough men for these places, women should not get these places under the new law.
And they also need to ask the men themselves if they want to fight with women for so-called “equality” - for example, for the right to visit the women's toilet on an equal basis with women, for the right to be indoors in a headdress, for the right to go forward a fellow traveler, for the right to sit in public transport and other rights of the weaker sex.
By and large, such a struggle is also not interesting for normal women. This is a fight for the bridegroom - yes, but they did not write the laws for this, as well as in the men's struggle for brides.
HIDDEN CONCEPT LINE "LEGISLATION": DISASSEMBLY OF THE CONSTITUTION AND DESTRUCTION OF EXISTING LAWS
Law of the Federal Law No. 284965-3 introduces positions that are in fundamental contradiction with the existing legislation.
The abolition of the presumption of innocence, when the employer is obliged to prove his innocence (Section 1st.13 of the draft law) violates Article 49 of the Constitution on the presumption of innocence, Penal Code and Administrative Code.
P. 4 Art. 24 of the draft law, according to which state bodies, local governments, public organizations, legal entities and citizens are obliged to provide materials and documents upon request of the gender equality commissioner, is contrary to Art. 23 and 24 Constitution on privacy, the safety of personal and family secrets.
Art. 6 of the draft law on gender balance, according to which the composition of appointed civil servants must comply with the approved gender proportions, as well as pp. 1 and 3 of p. 3 art. 12 of the draft law, according to which the employer is obliged to contribute equally to hiring women and men, violates Art. 15 Labor Code and Art. 37 Constitution (the right to work), since the appointment to the position will not be made depending on the qualifications and professional training of the citizen, but depending on the gender balance established by the state.
Article 11 of the draft law on the dependence of the number of dismissed persons of a particular sex on the proportionally established number of staff contradicts the constitutional principle of equality of men and women and article 179 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, according to which employees with higher labor productivity and qualifications have a preferential right to work.
Art. 14 of the law, according to which measures on gender equality are automatically included in any collective agreement, contradicts the Labor Code, namely 41, the article “Collective agreement”, since collective agreement is concluded only by agreement of the parties.
Clause 3 of part 8 of Article 21 of the draft law on compensation for non-pecuniary damage (from 100 to 500 thousand rubles), which the Commission on Gender Equality may appoint, violates Article 151 of the Civil Code on such decisions only in court.
The conclusion of the Legal Department of the State Duma from 2011, supplements this list with a number of violations, which the draft law abounds with.
DISCRIMINATION FALSE AND TRUE
Speaking about the prohibition of gender discrimination, the law introduces the concept of the possibility of “positive discrimination” (“temporary special measures aimed at accelerating the achievement of de facto equality between women and men in order to eliminate and prevent discrimination on the basis of sex” (Art. 7 of the draft).
In order to equalize the ratio of gender groups, it is necessary to subject a more numerous group of temporary discrimination until the moment when the proportions become equal, which violates Section 2, Article XXUMX of the Constitution (on equality of rights regardless of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, etc. .).
The state takes upon itself the functions of preventing gender discrimination and protecting society from information that justifies gender discrimination (items 2 and 6, paragraph 1, article 5), which entails the creation of a situation of discrimination based on religion and violates Article 28 Constitutions on freedom of conscience and religion, because Christian teaching is based on a hierarchy of relationships and puts husband and father at the head of the family.
The right of the Gender Equality Commission to consider complaints of gender discrimination to seek the assistance of the police (Section 5st.22 of the draft law) implies discrimination of all other citizens on the basis of priority of gender preferences.
LAWYER'S VIEW
The definition by the legislator in the draft Law of the Federal Law No. 284965-3 on the concept of “gender” as a “social aspect of relations between men and women”, due to its absence in the legislative field and in the Russian language, requires additional semantic analysis, as well as an analysis of global practice of applying gender theories.
According to the "explanatory Russian language dictionaries" D.N. Ushakova, S.I. Ozhegova, it is seen that the word "aspect" in Russian means "point of view", "look at something", "a definite understanding of something", the word "social" means "relating to people's life and their relations in society. "
Consequently, “gender” is a person’s social (social) point of view, perspective, or understanding of the relationship between men and women.
Based on the above, the male and female sex in the draft law of the Federal Law No. 284965-3 is not based on the biological field of a person, who everyone has from birth, but on the person’s perception of himself as a carrier of a certain sex, that is, on the basis of "social sex", which in a particular person may not coincide with the biological. As used in the Federal Law No. 284965-3, in the context of the concept “gender” or “social gender” disclosed above, such concepts as “men”, “women” include persons as traditional sexual orientation, which coincides with their biological gender, as well as persons who, being, for example, by biological sex, men, perceive (identify) themselves by “social sex” by women, and vice versa.
Consequently, the law does not speak at all about the equality of men and women as such, but about “gender equality” between men and women in the light of their “social sex”, which may not coincide with their biological sex.
The ambiguity of the “gender” wording in the proposed draft law creates a legislative gap, which implies a further explanation of the concept in the form of the adoption of regulations and bylaws and an expansive interpretation, as is the case with the juvenile term “abuse”.
OPEN CONCEPTUAL LINE "FAMILY": GENDER
The main word of the draft law is “gender”. It is key to the designation of the “new state policy”. The draft law concisely explains that “gender is a social aspect of relations between women and men,” considering, perhaps, unnecessary to explain in detail the “well-known”. But this word does not speak to the ordinary citizen about anything except flashing distant associations with the madness of feminism. And since there has been no “gender” in the legislative field of Russia before, it will have to turn to world experience.
In the life of mankind, the concept of "gender" appeared due to the entrepreneurial spirit of the American psychologist John Mani, who was involved in the correction of hermaphroditic children, making only girls for convenience, and came to the conclusion that the psychosexual neutrality of the newborn and that changing its installation. In 1955, he invented for his research a new word “gender” and summed up a scientific base for it, and in the process opened up a very profitable “Gender Identity Clinic”.
In 1965, the heartbroken parents of Bruce Reimer, a healthy boy from twins who had suffered a circumcision, turned to him and he persuaded them to surgically turn his son into a girl, Brenda. Already at the age of two, the “girl” tore off her dress, by the age of eleven, “she” began to be heard at the shoulders and flatly “refused” to participate in Mani's monthly therapy sessions, by the fifteen, in a state of depression, “was inclined” to suicide, and after learning I regained my true gender; at thirty years old "he", already David, committed suicide.
Second part of this stories Mani described the “successful treatment history” of a child only up to eight years of age, was not interested in his fate, but is still considered an authority on “the process of forming a person’s male or female identity or acquiring qualities typical of both sexes”.
On the basis of Mani’s research, a feminist theory of “social construction of gender” emerged, which, according to ideologists, is “oriented towards a political result” and “towards a change in social order”, and sets the goal of creating a future in which the “genderless” will exist as the highest manifestation of universal equality sex, a genderless family, a genderless professional organization and a genderless policy. ”
The concept of “persons with family responsibilities” is used for the first time and introduces positions that contradict existing legislation. They imply the legalization of the cohabitation of persons who currently cannot be a family in the eyes of the state and society. This creates the threat of legitimizing same-sex cohabitations and equating them to the family.
WINNING THE WORLD
The fight against “discrimination of women's rights” declared by feminists was first included in UN documents, in the 90s. it changed into “gender equality in a broad sense”, and then the “principle of equality regardless of sexual orientation” appeared.
In 1995 in Beijing at the World Conference on Women, organized by feminist and lesbian non-governmental organizations, an event occurred that was not noticed by the broad masses, but “fractured” reality into “before” and “after”: in the final document of the conference called “Beijing Platform for Action” “Gender” has been replaced by “gender”. Replacing the dictionary produced a social change, reformatting the world.
Subsequently, the Beijing Platform for Action was transformed into law, and in Western Europe and the United States, the Gender Mainstreaming movement emerged, which set itself the task of subordinating all the controls of society to the primacy of redistributing gender roles.
In 1997, the European Union secured the Amsterdam Gender Mainstreaming as its official strategy, and the UN defined it as the “main global strategy for promoting gender equality” that is binding on all UN member states: the peoples of individual states should reconsider their “outdated” views (on family, the birth and upbringing of children, education) and values in accordance with this theory, recognize the "alternative" sexual orientation as normal as the traditional heterosexual.
Following the signing of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights at the 2000, the mainstreaming of gender dimensions has become a mandatory requirement, supported by enormous financial resources. Abortion is automatically on the global agenda for gender mainstreaming. 16 April 2008, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe decided that in the 47 countries - members of the community there must be a de jure and de facto right to abortion.
GENDER MAINSTREAMING
The theory of “gender” is based on the distinction between the notions of Sex (biological sex) and Gender (social sex): “gender” refers to the socially and culturally determined sex roles of women and men, which, unlike biological sex, according to supporters of gender theory, are only “ learned ”, which means they can be CHANGED. According to theorists of gender, babies should be initially brought up asexual, while schoolchildren should be offered to choose one of the sexes.
The basis of Gender Mainstreaming is the theory of gender identity (self-identification), according to which the priorities in determining the social status (role) of a person are not biological signs, but who he is aware of himself regardless of biological signs.
According to foreign researchers, “a gender perspective aims to abolish the right of the state to designate gender, sexual identity and sexual orientation. To show how arbitrary the “male-female” dichotomy (double separation) is, two strategies are used: “sex entanglement” and consideration of sex factors. Gender trouble entanglement implies negation of the natural conditionality of sex roles, supposedly just constructed and purely random products of the development of society. All sorts of particular cases serve to increase the number of different sexes (gender from five to nine). The entanglement of the sexes is based on the hypothesis of the philosopher and ideologist of the “68 revolution of the year” Marcuse, that “in order to overthrow a corrupt society, any sexual deviations should be encouraged”.
According to this theory, for most people, gender identity and biological signs are the same, but there are situations when gender identity (gender identity) has a weak connection with biological (sex) signs or contradicts them.
Under such circumstances, the individual may feel like a woman, having the biological attributes of the man, and vice versa; either he may not consider himself to either of the sexes, or - to two sexes at once. In accordance with the options of gender identity, sexual orientation, in addition to the traditional heterosexual, can be bisexual, transgender, gay-sexual, lesbian (the LGBT community is the term of the Western world, an abbreviation of these types of sexual orientation).
German sociologist Gabriela Kubi talks about Gender Mainstreaming and its development in Germany: “This is about social engineering, about creating a new sex-variable person. In order to achieve this, the state must take possession of children and sexualize them as early as possible. ”
The annual report of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) “Cultural, Gender Equality and Human Rights Issues: Achieving a Common Understanding” from 2008 addressed the need to take into account the cultural characteristics of each country in order to “identify the most effective ways to combat the harmful cultural traditions and strengthening useful traditions. " The values advocated by UNFPA are gender equality, sexuality education and contraception. Gender policy in the countries of Gender Mainstreaming involves the legalization of homosexual marriage, the adoption of children by homosexuals and lesbians, the adoption of laws on homophobia, the promotion of homosexuality to children.
Perverts seek total domination: already in a number of world capitals, open homosexuals have become mayors, marching in the front ranks of the “gay parades” they have resolved, and in a number of European countries, active lesbians head the state church.
HIDDEN CONCEPTUAL LINE "FAMILY": DESTROYING THE FAMILY AND THE CHURCH
The attitude to gender as to the manifestations of feminism masks the main goal of the law - the secretive and therefore violent destruction of national principles, which are the traditional family, upbringing, culture, morality, faith; fundamental change over the centuries of the emerging value system.
In the law, instead of the concept of “family”, a fundamentally new concept of “persons with family responsibilities” appears (paragraph 4, paragraph 1, article XXUMX of the draft law), the support of which is now declared as one of the goals of “public policy on gender equality”. This concept, like the concept of “gender,” does not clarify what refers us again to the notorious “Western experience”, where, for example, the personal life of the elderly singer Elton John and his “friend” who adopted the little boy are widely advertised. This draft law does not say that this will be different here.
Innovation is not consistent with society and is key to understanding the true goals and objectives of the bill, namely, in the destruction of the family. The consequences of this change will affect everyone, regardless of their status and official position.
Established by law, gender education and education of citizens, the use of gender training programs and textbooks, the imposition of a "culture of gender equality", the fight against "information justifying gender discrimination", social protection of "victims of gender discrimination", prepare the country for other priorities and other state structure .
At the same time, lobbyists of the adoption in Russia of the law on “gender equality between men and women” are silent about the negative international experience of adopting and implementing similar laws in Germany, Italy, Sweden, the United States and other countries, in particular: legalizing same-sex marriage, replacing the words “mother” and “ dad ”on the words“ parent No. 1 ”and“ parent No. 2 ”, a course for asexual education in kindergartens and forcing schoolchildren to“ free choice ”of sex.
The system of upbringing and education should, from an early age, educate children in the spirit of the so-called gender freedom, that is, awareness of the “secondary” biological features for self-awareness of their social status (role), the inadmissibility of such upbringing of a child when from childhood he is grafted with the traditional qualities of a woman or man (in the "gender" language - the inadmissibility of the stimulation in a child of gender identification by gender).
This leads to the impossibility of the formation of a child's gender identity, the spreading of homosexual relationships and other deviations (deviations) among children, the growth of suicides and venereal diseases among children.
VIENNA, AUSTRIA
Renata Brauner, a member of the Vienna City Council, and project manager Daniela Orner opened the first “geschlechtssensibel” kindergarten “Fun & Care” (“Fun and Care”) in 1999.
Translating gender theories into reality, the organizers strive to “open up as many new and versatile roads for boys and girls as possible to achieve real equality of chances”: girls are taught to play football, to tinker with tools, to take cars away from boys, to achieve his cry and strength; boys are shown how to play with dolls, acquaint them with massage and body care, give each bag with cosmetics, explain what it means to be beautiful, dress up in a princess dress, paint their nails, help them to get used to the passive role: endure, ask for help, give way
MUNICH, GERMANY
Teachers from the organization “Disens” hold the so-called “Prejudice Contest” with adolescents, which should show that men and women differ to a much smaller extent than is commonly believed. There is a heated debate about whether girls can go to the toilet while standing, and whether young men should show their feelings. The official goal of “Disens” is “the destruction of the adolescent's identity”, “nurturing from him a critique of one’s own sex” and forming from it not just “another young man”, but generally “not young men”.
STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN
In the Egalia kindergarten, they actively work with gender equality: the words “boy” and “girl” are not used, personal pronouns such as “hon” or “han” are not prohibited, but they are blocked by the polo-neutral word “hen”.
The Swedish publishing house “Fairy Publishing” publishes books that replace “gender-incorrect” in kindergartens “Snow White” and “Thumbelina” - about male giraffes dreaming of a child, or of a princess who rejected the suitors until the forest edge of the girl and did not love her.
DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCH
The right of public organizations and citizens to apply for observance of “gender equality” in structures authorized to protect gender equality creates the risk of destroying the original hierarchy and paternalism in the Church and the threat of introducing a female priesthood into the church life. It is thanks to these laws in Europe that women are not only allowed to become priests (or priests?), But also not to be shy about choosing their own gender - therefore, a number of state churches are headed by open lesbians there.
It is gratifying that the clergy of Russia understands all the mischief of the Gender Mainstreaming approaching the country and raise their voices in defense of tradition, morality and faith (video blog of Father Dmitry Smirnov, interviews of a number of priests of the Russian Orthodox Church).
PROMOTION OF THE LAW
The law was introduced to the State Duma of the third convocation by the deputy E. Lakhova, adopted in the first reading of 16 on April 2003, and was in the archives of the Duma until 2011. It was assumed that in order to implement the provisions of the law, it would be necessary to “suspend, amend or cancel”, the Civil Procedure Code, the Federal Law on Education, the Federal Law on Public Associations, the Federal Law on Trade Unions ..., the Principles of Public Service in the Russian Federation, "On the general principles of the organization of legislative and executive state power in the subjects of the Russian Federation"
In 2008, interest in the bill suddenly flared up again, and E. Mizulina, Chairperson of the Committee for Family, Women and Children, took the law out of the Committee for Public Associations and Religious Organizations and included it in the work plans of the structure she heads.
EXPERT COUNCIL
In 2008, to work on the law in the Committee on Family, Women and Children of the State Duma, an Expert Council was established to work on a law on the equal rights of men and women, which in addition to Committee Chairman Ye.B. Mizulina among others included the director of the Moscow Center for Gender Studies O.A. Voronina, Gender Issues Advisor, United Nations Development Program; G.V. Kalinaeva, Head of the Center for Social and Political Studies, Institute for US and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences N.А. Shvedova, Co-coordinator of the Gender Studies Program and Co-Director of the Nordik Research School in Interdisciplinary Gender Studies A.A. Temkina.
WORKING GROUP
17 February 2009 was decided to establish a working group to prepare a draft law for consideration by the State Duma, which was organized and chaired by the Chairman of the Committee on Family, Women and Children EB. Mizulina. As a result of the work of the working group in the process of preparing for the second reading, the volume of the law has increased from 19 pages to 30.
There were a number of changes in it: the name of the law “On state guarantees of equal rights for women and men” became the name “On state guarantees of equal rights and freedoms of men and women and equal opportunities for their realization”.
New articles and concepts have appeared in the law: discrimination on the basis of sex and (or) the presence of children; gender quota; gender expertise; gender balance; prohibition of gender discrimination; positive discrimination; sexual harassment at work; support for individuals with family responsibilities; information justifying gender discrimination; gender statistics; state report on gender equality issues; development and implementation of a National Action Plan for the implementation of gender equality; organization of gender education and awareness; a person who considers himself discriminated; victims of gender discrimination; Gender Equality Commission and many others
All changes made by the working group under the guidance of E. Mizulina are easy to detect in the draft version of the law for the second reading posted on the official website of the State Duma: they are specifically highlighted in bold.
By comparing the 2011 bill with the 2003 variant, one can come to a simple and obvious conclusion that the main thrust of the amendments consists in maximally saturating the text of the law with the word “gender” and their derivatives.
ROUND TABLE IN THE STATE DUMA
17 March 2011 EB Mizulina in the State Duma held a round table "On increasing the representation of women in the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation." Among the decisions of the resolution is: “Prepare the draft Federal Law No. 284965-3“ On state guarantees of equal rights and freedoms of men and women and equal opportunities for their realization ”for consideration by the State Duma in the second reading”; “Public chambers to hold public hearings of draft law No. 284965-3”; “To ensure the development of the draft law“ On Amendments to the Hotel Laws of the Russian Federation in connection with the adoption of the Federal Law No. 284965-3 “On State Guarantees of Equal Rights and Freedoms of Men and Women and Equal Opportunities for Their Implementation”.
The resolution was sent to the Public Chambers of the Regions, from where the words of approval traditionally came, meaning "nationwide support" of the Committee's initiative.
PUBLIC PROTESTS
From December 2011 to February 2012 in Russia, a wave of pickets and rallies against the adoption of the Federal Law No. 284965-3 “On State Guarantees of Equal Rights and Freedoms of Men and Women and Equal Opportunities for Their Implementation.” A number of round tables were held, the decisions of which on the inadmissibility of adopting a law were sent to regional and federal authorities.
26 January 2012 participants of the XX Christmas Readings, public figures, experts and leaders of the largest public organizations in Russia and the near abroad gathered for an emergency meeting at which the question was raised about the anti-family and provocative activities of the Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Family, Women and Children Deputy Mizulina EB According to the results of the discussion, the “Protest Note” was accepted by the public and then sent to the authorities and placed in the media.
27 January 2012. The second reading of the draft was postponed and signed by the Chairman of the State Duma S.E. Naryshkin the bill was sent to federal and regional authorities, “having found that the amendments to this bill are sent to the State Duma Committee on Family, Women and children up to 23 February 2012. ”
It is noteworthy that the draft law as amended by 2003 was sent to the regions, and the draft law as amended by 2011, with numerous “gender” amendments introduced by the State Duma Committee on Family, Women and Children, is currently posted on the State Duma’s official website. adoption
ROTATION TO THE COMMITTEE
Targeted appeals of the public to the State Duma regarding the draft law have found a response from the conscience of the deputies: 10.02.2012 (on Friday), according to the information of the State Duma website (http://www.duma.gov.ru/structure/committees/131050/), this Committee consisted of 11 people: Mizulina, Semenova, Borzov, Epifanova, Sokolov, Alimov, Bychkov, Kuzmichev, Kuliev, Rodnina, Chirkov.
And 13.02.2012 (Monday), there were no names in the list: Epifanova, Bychkova, Rodnina, but the following last names were present: Zerenkov, Manuylova, Senatorova.
14.02.2012 (Tuesday) returned the following names to the list: Epifanova, Bychkova. Today, the Committee consists of 13 people - each of them has the opportunity to build his own honest position regarding the consequences of adopting a law and to fulfill his civic duty.
ROUND TABLE IN CJ
19 February 2012 on the initiative of the Moscow Center for Gender Studies and the Gender Council of the International Federation in the Marble Hall of the Central House of Journalists held a round table on the topic “Why does Russia need to adopt the Federal Law No. XXUMX-284965“ On state guarantees of equal rights and freedoms for men and women and equal opportunities for their realization. ”
Its participants expressed an extreme degree of indignation "by these public men and churchmen," who do not protect women’s rights. In the heated debates, the intention was to “urgently send a letter to Putin” and by all available means (and among the participants were journalists) to launch a media campaign to promote the law, which was done the next day with the help of the Metro newspaper.
RESULTS
The 284965-3 Law “On State Guarantees of Equal Rights and Freedoms of Men and Women and Equal Opportunities for Their Implementation (On State Guarantees of Equal Rights of Women and Men)” legalizes the notion of “gender” in the legal space of the country, and leads Russia to the need to follow Gender Mainstreaming and “revise outdated views and values”.
Western Europe and the United States have already found their goal and are floating on the waves of Gender Mainstreaming to the “beautiful far”, hiding behind a rosy mist the grin of a dead man.
The concept of "gender" is a means of unifying gender and eliminating differences. If sex is no longer a permanent integral part of a person, but a set of characteristics with the temporary dominance of one of them, then it as such does not exist at all, and everything depends on what the individual has been taught to.
The abolition of sex is much more serious than it seems: it is the abolition of men and women and the creation of a “sex-variable” person. Fighting for the “gender law” public activists, “found understanding in the Committee”, and feminists with “ten years of experience”, working out plans for a victorious battle with the “clerical circles” are a sad symptom of universal degradation and loss of meaning.
The principle of economic expediency, which took possession of the minds of the majority - a poisonous pill in a golden package: for grants, privileges, honor and places in the presidiums, you can, without hesitation, betray your children.
The essence of the struggle on the field of gender is spiritual abuse. The main result of the adoption of the law is “the abolition of God” in our souls. It is poison ready to eat. It remains only to open the mouth and swallow a deadly mixture. Those who will propose to do this will explain everything very correctly and beautifully - that it is necessary to protect women, for the good of the girls, for Europe, for the world, etc. That "there is nothing in the law about the five sexes" and, therefore, there is nothing to fear.
Everything will be very worthy and convincing - as in Europe. Enough to stand out - it's time to be like everyone else! Down with the Asiatic - it's time for the "enlightened West"! In enlightened Sodom!
The murder will happen unnoticed, and it will not hurt.
Information